RAID Setup on Mac Pro with OS X 10.5.2 Server Software

Hello All,
Have Mac Pro Tower 2.66 GHZ with Leopard Server OS X 10.5.2 installed, all software up to date, 2 GB RAM and 3 Hard Drives, 250 GB with System and Users, 2 by 500 GB I want to set-up in RAID 1 Configuration to mirror the 250 GB Start-up Drive.
Have set-up the RAID successfully using Disk Utility a number of times but it does not replicate.
Read that I cannot set-up the RAID when started from the 250 GB Start-up, so started from OS X Leopard Installer DVD and set-up the RAID using Disk Utility again, restart Server from 250 GB Drive, does not replicate, 500 GB RAID 1 Array still says 465 GB available.
What am I doing wrong?
Can someone post a step by step set-up for the RAID 1 Configuration I want to use please?

I you mirror the 250GB drive with one of the 500GB you will end up with a 250GB mirrored drive.
(You can't first mirror/RAID 1 the 2 500GB and expect the server to "understand" what to do?!)
You might better get another 250GB and mirror those two 250GB drives...
(And you can't partition a mirrored drive.)

Similar Messages

  • Pros and cons to JBOD/N-RAID setup on MacBook Pro with two internal SSDs

    First, to clarify, in this case, I mean the term "JBOD/N-RAID" to refer to a concatenated or spanning set of drives as supported by OS X and Disk Utility.
    I've got an original Apple-installed 120GB 3G (3Gb/s) SSD which I'll be moving into the optical bay using an OWC "Data Doubler" and swapping a new 240GB OWC Mercury Electra 6G (6Gb/s) SSD into the main drive bay.
    My goal is to avoid having two separate volumes.
    Understand that a RAID 0 array would essentially only perform as well as the slowest drive in the array (the 3G SSD in this case), if it would even work at all given the two drives are not identical in make and capacity.
    I've read that a JBOD/N-RAID array isn't subject to the "same make and capacity" constraints. But how does this setup perform?
    Would the speed of the 6G be hobbled, slowed down to the 3G's speed (or worse?), if I were to set up the two SSDs as a JBOD/N-RAID array?
    Is this even a recommended idea - that is, paying for the convenience of having one virtual volume by adding the complexity (and risks?) of a JBOD / N-RAID setup?

    I am following your advice and attempting to install Bonjour. I wasn't sure where to install it so I am following the VMWare Knowledge Base #1003814: Sharing a printer with a Windows virtual machine using Apple Bonjour.
    I have copied it below to refer to because I've run into a problem.
    I have completed steps 1 a-d.
    The Problem: Step 1 e. Click Printers. Printers is not shown under Removable Devices. When I try to Add Device (Printers) it says "New Devices cannot be added until the Virtual Machine is Shut Down and then Resumed." I have shut down the Virtual Machine alone, I've shut down AMware Fusion and I've shut down both Windows and Mac. Nothing has changed when I try and add Printers so I can do Step e.
    I sure hope someone can help.
    To configure a printer connected to your Mac for use with the Bonjour utility and a virtual machine in Fusion:
    Configure your virtual machine for Bridged Networking and disable ThinPrint:
    Click Virtual Machine > Settings.
    Click Network (Adapter).
    Enable Bridged Mode. In Fusion 5.x, select Autodetect under Bridge networking.
    Click Show All.
    Click Printers.
    Set printer sharing to Off.
    Click Close.
    Reboot the virtual machine.
    Install Bonjour for Windows. Download and install Bonjour for Windows in the virtual machine. Bonjour is available from Apple at http://support.apple.com/kb/DL999.
    Note: The preceding link was correct as of January 20, 2010. If you find the link is broken, provide feedback and a VMware employee will update the link.
    Share the printer in Mac OS:
    Open System Preferences.
    Click Print and Fax.
    Select the printer you want to share, and select Share this printer.
    To configure the printer in the guest operating system with the Bonjour Utility:
    Double-click the Bonjour Printer Wizard.
    Click Next.
    Under Shared printers select the printer you want to use.
    Click Next.
    Click Finish.

  • How best to setup a Mac Pro with two hard drives for 1st hard drive or OS failure?

    My first Apple, a Mac Pro,  is to arrive on Monday (1/7).  I will be putting Win7 on Bootcamp and installing Parrallels.  It will have two 1T hard drives.   I would appreciate
    any advice on how best to set it up for best recovery in case of a hard drive or OS crash.   You can tell I have experience with Windows.    It looks like my best choices are
    either disk cloning software or just installing OS X from the recovery disk  on the second drive.   Apple says it is legal to do another installation.   I know the disk cloning will not work on the bootcamp partition which I plan to use for the Parallels program.  Can OS X have an option to boot from two differnet disks and OS installs?
    What I am really wanting to do in the event of a crash,  is to just boot up on the other disk and keep working.     I try to keep data on a separate partition  with backups so
    that a disk or OS crash doesn't cause any data loss.

    I do not use windows.
    However on my Mac Pro for cloning/backups/bootable backups i use Carbon Copy Cloner.
    It has an ability to clone entire disk (unless specified differently) so I can boot from another disk or restore back if I want to.

  • Mac Pro with software raid and upgrading to Snow Leopard

    Not sure if anyone else has experienced this but here goes. I have a mac pro with 4 500G drives using the onboard software raid. When I insert the Snow Leopard disk and try to install, it fails to find the raid. Is there a trick to get this to work?

    Thank you SSSOOO much Greg818. I was pulling my hair out over this problem. I even went so far as to do a full Leopard install with Snow Leopard update on a USB drive and them cloned it over to my RAID 0 array using SuperDuper hoping that this would solve the problem. It seemed to in the sense that the clone went fine but then when I would try and boot from the array I would get the Apple Logo and spinning wheel but it just kept spinning and spinning until finally the Apple logo was replaced by the Do Not Enter symbol(you know the circle with the slash through it).
    So came here and found this thread. Your solution worked like charm!!! Once again thank you so much... you saved me from being bald.

  • Itunes library sharing on single Mac Pro with 2 users.

    Recently I have setup a Mac Pro with 2 users. Primarily the thought was to have this as the media server for a couple of AppleTV (2nd generation) and other users. The primary user on the Mac Pro (me), has the iTunes Library located in the Public Directory. Home sharing is enabled, on all systems. There is no problem when the Primary user is logged in and iTunes is running. When the second user, logs into the Mac Pro, nobody has access to the iTunes Library of the primary user.
    I was thinking of setting up the secondary user with the same itunes directory, but when new content is added by the primary user, the secondary user would not see it automatically, would they?
    Basically I am trying to set up a common iTunes library for all users and all devices. Is it possible

    michaelfromsherwood park wrote:
    The primary user on the Mac Pro (me), has the iTunes Library located in the Public Directory.
    while logged in to the other user account, launch iTunes while holding the option (⌥) key, click on choose library when prompted, and select the iTunes folder in the shared folder.
    if you're using fast user switching, user A must quit iTunes before user B can access the library.
    Home sharing is enabled, on all systems.
    home sharing is designed to work between two (or more) computers on the the same LAN.

  • 2010 Mac Pro with Apple RAID card - "Drive carrier 00:03 removed"

    I've got a 2010 Mac Pro with the Apple RAID card and 4 internal identical Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB drives inside.
    I've never had a problem with the RAID card (either battery or in operation) except for one thing:
    Almost every time I shut the machine down (which I try to do as rarely as possible), it keeps losing Drive 3, the spare.
    (See RAID Utility event log snippet below.)
    [I wish I could understand why this Apple RAID card keeps losing the spare across power-cycles/reboots, but I digress.]
    So I just adopted it as the spare and it spawns the rebuild and many hours later, everything's fine again.
    ... until the last time I rebooted (Jan. 2nd).
    After the usual "I lost the spare" message upon login, it began the rebuild.
    But this time, about 11 1/2 hours later the rebuild stopped and RAID Utility reported "Drive carrier 00:03 removed".
    Bay 3 is now missing in the Controller view.
    I powered off the system last night, and left it off overnight.  Today I took all the drives out, blew the dust off and reseated them.
    Same thing.  Drive 3 is still missing, and now the rebuild task aborted.
    The drive bay location shouldn't matter, right?  Can I swap the Bay 3 drive with the Bay 4 drive?
    I figure one of two things would happen:
    (1) It will report Bay 3 as being there but Bay 4 as being missing, same situation as is now.  Meaning the problem is in the Bay 3 spare drive.
    (2) It will report Bay 3 as being missing (despite a 'good' drive being present) and Bay 4 will be the (unattached) spare, and the RAID set will be unviable.  Meaning the problem is with the drive bay itself, not whatever drive is plugged into it.
    If "Drive carrier removed" is trying to tell me the disk is bad, why do I not see any log messages about it?  I suppose a spare that never gets used could go bad from lack of use, but ... no messages at all?
    Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete            
    % sudo raidutil list driveinfo
    Drives  Raidset       Size      Flags
    Bay #1  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #2  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #4  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Event log snippet:
    Saturday, January 11, 2014 8:15:19 AM PT
    Background task aborted: Task=Rebuild,Scope=DRVGRP,Group=RS1
    informational
    Friday, January 3, 2014 3:50:28 AM PT
    Drive carrier 00:03 removed
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:37 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:28 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:28:34 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:17 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:08 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:11 PM PT
    The "RedundancyScrub" command could not be executed. (Invalid request or invalid parameter in the request.)
    warning
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:03 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Friday, December 6, 2013 4:56:47 AM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:53:44 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 10:53:11 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 3:41:33 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 3:41:35 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 8:37:49 AM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:51 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:42 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:08:59 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:32:29 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1
    warning

    Power Pig wrote:
    "Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete     
    I was talking about this.
    This looks like a RAID 5 setup without the parity to me. I would said it basically a RAID 0.
    Also you metioned "I guess that previous spare must really have gone 'bad', despite having never been used! "
    I wiped everything out, I selected the 3 disks and clicked on "Create RAID Set" with RAID5 selected and the "Use unassigned drives as spares" option checked.  The 3rd disk has always been marked as the spare ever since then.  You do not have a choice to create a "RAID5 setup without the parity".  If I wanted a RAID0 I would have chosen a RAID0!  raidutil now says
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,3,4    5.23TB    0.00MB  No tasks running
    Every time the system would 'lose' Drive 3 on boot, I would just keep rebooting until it was 'found', and then manually re-assign the now-'floating' drive as the spare - and the RAID would rebuild.
    There was never a problem until the day that prompted this post - when it would not find Drive 3 no matter what I did.  I turned the Mac Pro off for several hours until the drives had all cooled down and it still did not find the drive.  I left the machine on but unmounted the degraded volume until I got the new replacement drive.
    I really don't understand what you are getting at. It's like you are trying to tell me I set it up as a 4-drive RAID5 with no parity(!) and that I was in grave danger because one of the disks was gone.  The actual RAID contents (spread across Drives 1, 2 and 4) were never in danger, unless a 2nd disk had failed while the spare was not seen by the Apple RAID card.  I wasn't too worried about that happening.

  • Mac Pro with Apple Raid Card - 1 drive OSX (JBOD) + 1 drive Vista?

    Can anyone walk me through what I'd need to do to set up an early 2008 model Mac Pro with the Apple Raid Card pre-installed and 2 500 gig drives, so that I can have OSX on the first drive and Vista on the second?
    I know it defeats the purpose of the raid card, but...
    What I've done so far is:
    1. Removed drive #2
    2. Install and using Raid Utility, add the first drive as a JBOD set/volume
    3. After install, shut down the machine
    4. Re-add drive #2
    5. Restart
    6. Use disk utility to add drive #2
    I tried to use bootcamp, but it only wants to put windows on the first drive - which won't work because it is RAID.

    Run Vista off an ATA interface in the 2nd optical drive. There is an SATA 2 ATA adapter.
    I think you can boot Vista off some RAID controllers, check out Highpoint RocketRAIDs. Should be able to configure the RR.
    Boot Vista off USB is a stretch.

  • Mac PRo with raid card shipped with drive not suitable for raid?

    Hi all,
    I ordered a Mac Pro with raid card and a 1TB hard drive. The drive which came in the computer was WDC WD1001FALS which is not a hard drive rated for raid usage. On Western Digital's site they suggest using WD1002FBYS.
    Is the model WD1001FALS the correct drive which Apple ships although one ordered the raid card?

    The WD 640GB Blue, and WD 1TB Black are the only drive options for the mac pro; that's what you choose.
    The RE3 (or FBYS) is not an option sold through apple. Buying the raid card, is not going to change the drive.
    On whether to use the RE3 over the Blacks, it depends on how you will be using it. From what I've heard, the Blacks are enterprise drives themselves; basically with just a less robust firmware (no TLER). If you will have the drives on 24/7 in a raid 5, then yes, RE3 will probably be better. If not, I think the black will suffice; note the blacks are GREAT drives by themselves anyway.
    The apple raid card can connect to both SATA and SAS drives internally, however most times people buying the raid card want to use it for SAS drives. There are a lot more cheaper and possibly a lot more stable options then apple's raid card if you are looking to use SATA drives.
    Check amug:
    http://www.amug.org/
    A common problem with the apple raid card is the battery:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA849Z/B?mco=NDc1ODczNw
    Lastly about enterprise drives, truthfully I don't see the difference really. I have enterprise drives in a 8-drive raid5 config running 24/7 as a server. 2 drives died on me after about 4 months. To top it off, they died within 10 min of each other, crushing the raid to pieces. Granted they were Seagate ES.2's, it's understandable
    The boot drive of the server is a stock desktop WD drive and running 24/7. It's been running for almost 4 years straight.

  • Is it possible to upgrade the Mac Pro with SCSI/SAS drives?

    Hi guys I am considering to move on to a Mac Pro from my old PC.
    The Mac Pro enclosure is quite unique in its hard drive holders as no cables are used and all drives are connected with a plugin mechanism.
    So I am curious if that will allow me to upgrade to a SCSI/SAS storage system which requires cable connections between drives and the SCSI/SAS card on the PCI-E slot. I dont know if this will be possible with the Mac Pro enclosure.
    Has anyone tried to do this？
    Btw is there any Ultra320 or SAS(preferably) interface card available for Mac OS X?

    The connectors for SATA drives can be used with SAS drives. However, the controller needs to be SAS compatible. I have never installed a SAS drive in the Mac Pro bay to see what happens. If some one has a SAS drive and wants to try this I would be interested in the results.
    My guess is that the Mac Pro would not see the drive.
    Areca sells the Mac Pro PCIe bootable ARC-1680 SAS controller in several configurations. This controller allows the user to utilize SAS or SATA hard drives connected to the card. The ARC-1680x comes with two external mini SAS connectors that can support eight direct connect hard drives or up to 128 devices (in theory) when used with SAS expanders.
    The ARC-1680LP has one internal mini SAS port and one external mini SAS port. I looked at the Mac Pro internal SATA connectors and they can unscrew from the frame but there is only about 1/2" of clearance in that area of the case. In addition, I would want the hot swap bays to still operate and I did not see an easy way to patch into the existing SATA connectors. It would be nice if the Mac Pro factory connectors used snap on SATA connector on the back of the backplane so that users could interface the 4 SATA bays with an internal PCie controller. However, its hard wired in the existing configuration. With the new Mac Pro PCIe RAID 5 card on the market there must be alternative connectors that allow this type of installation to work properly.
    Based on the ease at which the Areca SAS controller can be added as an external using the ARC-1680x I went with that option. I am using it with eight direct connect SATA hard drives now. I plan to expand the storage by adding a SAS expander in the form of a hub or an enclosure with SAS capabilities. I have been looking at a 16 bay SAS enclosure but I am not sure how loud it will be
    Details on the ARC-1680 can be found here:
    http://www.areca.com.tw/products/pcietosas1680series.htm
    Its very cool to have SAS or SATA capability along with a bootable card that can support tons of hard drives and RAID levels 0, 1,1E, 3, 5, 6, 10, 30, 50, 60 or JBOD . I booted the Mac Pro with a 2TB Mac OS X 10.4.10 RAID 6 volume and ran Xbench. It shows a 400MB/sec. hard drive setup and raises the overall Xbench score substantially.
    While I doubt I will boot the Mac Pro from the RAID 6 volume much, it is very cool that that function is available. This is the only PCIe host adapter I have found with boot capabilities besides Apples new $999 4 port SATA internal card. SAS has lots of expansion capabilities. Users that want pretty much unlimited hard drive connectivity will enjoy the new ARC-1680x.
    Have fun!

  • Adding RAID 5 to Mac Pro - Will Bootcamp sill work?

    Hi people,
    I currently have a Mac Pro with 500GB HDD, and have ordered an additional 2 x 500GB drives.
    I was wondering if I would still be able to run Boot Camp with a software based RAID 5 array that was set up in OS X - Would XP be able to address that RAID array, or would I need a partition on a non-RAID disk to make windows function.
    I'm worried that windows will not be able to access a volume that was created in OS X, but I rely on XP being available on my workstation for certain applications. Would I be better off with a RAID-1 mirror for OS X, and use the third HDD for XP?
    Thanks in advance for the advice.
    Adam
    Mac Pro 2.66, 2GB, 1.5TB -=- MacBook Pro 2.16, 1GB, 100GB   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    OK - Many thakns for your help.
    I've installed the drives, and setup a RAID-5 Configuration, as my system disk, and added a WD Raptor as a fourth disk, I was planning to use this as my windwos disk, but Bootcamp assistant tells me I can't
    Oh well, looks like the PC is staying in the studio for a bit longer!
    Thanks again,
    Adam

  • RAID harddrives for Mac Pro 2009

    Hello,
    I'm planning to build a software RAID for a MacPro4.1 that offers me a quiet solution with reasonable performance. I would like to create a RAID 10 with four 2 or 3 TB drives.
    I found the Western Digital Cavier Green 2 TB drives WD20EARS very tempting at first because of price and specs, but I read there are problems when using them in a Mac. It seems the problem is clicking, performance lags and final drive failures after a couple of hundret days. The specs page outline that these drives can be used for desktop RAID, but not for business critical RAID applications. So what does this mean?  WD makes the 2 TB WD2003FYYS Raid Edition 4 drives with different features, but they are also 3 times more expensive.
    If the WD20EARS drives are indeed a problem, how about the WD blue and black drives? Information from WD outlines that non of the desktop drives have the TLER features, which is necessary for RAID, among other things.
    How about drives from other manufacturers like Seagate Samsung and Hitachi?
    Thanks!

    You want quiet, otherwise I would have said go for hardware RAID controller and external drives, and look at RAID6.
    Software can't - though some have with very mixed results - used Disk Utility but the overhead of 10 isn't conducive.  And not worth the risks and limitations.
    If Apple implemented hardware motherboard RAID, yes, but when you get into 2TB size drives forget RAID3/5 and others.
    Just have redundant sets and good backup strategy.
    Keep the boot drive to OS-only (and apps of course)
    There are, have to be, one or two controllers with internal drive support, but harder to do on Mac Pro with its wiring of cables and such.
    WD RE are meant for hardware RAID. Black edition are fine for software based. And if you want a better RAID mousetrap, I'd invest in SoftRAID 4.0 even for stripe or mirror (and a much better feature set to help protect your drives and data).

  • I have a Mac Pro with four hard drives. I currently have Lion installed on one hard drive. I want to have the option to boot from either Lion or Snow Leopard. How can I do this?

    I have a Mac Pro with four hard drives. I currently have Lion installed on one hard drive. I want to have the option to boot from either Lion or Snow Leopard. How can I do this?

    It's best to install Snow Leopard on one of the three remain drives without an Operating System.
    You can then install the applications you need from the original media. Create a User Account using Setup Assistant.
    Do you want to migrate User Accounts from the OSX LIon boot drive, or are you keeping the User Accounts separate?
    Dual-booting just requires holding the option key during startup and selecting either Lion or Snow Leopard.

  • Dell PowerVault MD1000 with Mac OS X Server 10.5 (mac pro with fiber connec

    Hey Guys. Its time that i add a bulk amount of storage to our mac network.
    Currently Our network consists of one mac server which is a Mac Pro with Mac OSX Server 10.5 installed on it with 4 x 750GB Hard Drives with a couple of client machines. I now need to add atleast another 6TB to the network. This needs to be seen as the server as one drive so that 6TB needs to be raid prosume (raid 5)
    Now in the Mac Pro server we have a Fibre Card that we dont currently use with 2 slots. My Plan is to buy a Dell PowerVault™ MD1000 (http://configure.euro.dell.com/dells...ulmd1000sata) and put in the amount of hard drives i require into the Dell Storage.
    Would this work. If i bought the Dell PowerVault™ MD1000, would i beable to hook this upto the mac server and use it as a storage drive? Although i do no networking. Im still very new to this.
    Ideally im looking for something similar to an Xserve Raid, but with out the Apple price tag on the outside if you guys no what i mean.
    Best,
    Nathaniel

    You would at least need a SAS/SATA controller - preferably a hardware RAID one, much like the one bundled with this unit - but it also needs to be OS X compatible.
    I would look for something that is known to work, not something you "cobble" together.
    The FibreChannel card does you no good if you haven't got a device with FC ports.

  • New mac pro with fiber attached san storage

    We have a digital media department that uses After Effects to produce content for different types of media boards, digital signage, post production  etc. They start with Red 4K files which get edited in AE and rendered to different video formats. They want to move away from Windows PC based editors with multi drive RAID local storage to the new MAC Pro with 8GB fiber attached to a shared SAN storage solution. First question, is this a wise move to run After Effects? Second question is, do you need to create multiple logical volumes on the SAN storage to accommodate where AE render location, cache, source, database, and general media content files are stored or can this all be stored on different folders in one large 50TB volume? Third question is, should six different editors be sharing the location where these files are stored?

    Third question is, should six different editors be sharing the location where these files are stored?
    No. Each user should have his own home directory. Not for performance resons, but simply because they'll end up overwriting each other's files. The rest - logical volumes don't matter on your end, but SAN systems still use internal stripe groups, so it would make sense to define volumes on those stripe sets simply in the interest of performance. Beyond that AE doesn't really care. It uses the operating system's file I/O stuff and 'NIX based systems don't differentiate between local volumes or otehr resources as long as they are mounted correctly in teh file system.
    Mylenium

  • No Flash Video Playback on Mac Pro with Leopard

    I recently purchased a Mac Pro with Leopard, Final Cut Studio
    2, and Adobe Production Premium suite. I got everything setup
    yesterday, and I exported a Quicktime reference file from Final
    Cut, and brought it into Flash CS3 Media Encoder. The file seemed
    to encode fine, but when I try to open it, it shows that the Flash
    Player opens, but the video never actually opens. I also tired to
    import the FLV file into Flash Pro, and it acts as though it
    imports, but it does let me preview it. The ONLY thing that I think
    could have caused a problem is that I also have Sorenson Squeeze
    installed, which has its own On2 VP6 encoder. Again, this may have
    nothing to do with it since I copied the file to another Mac
    machine that did not have Sorenson on it, and downloaded the
    standalone Flash Player, and it acted the same. Any ideas on why
    FLV files would not play back would be greatly appreciated. I have
    ALL updates installed for OS X Leopard, as well as the CS3
    collection. Thanks in advance.

    I really appreciate your help with this. As simple as it
    sounds, I was really wrapped up in getting a second HD editing
    suite up and running, and had not done my homework. Prior to your
    post, I tried to play 5 different FLV files on 3 machines. None of
    them played until I downloaded a great FLV player. Once I installed
    the FLV player, all of the videos played flawlessly. Thanks
    again!

Maybe you are looking for