Rebate billing doc not reflected in COPA

I have mapped the rebate condition type BO01 to BO05 with a COPA value field called rebate value already. However, I found that no COPA doc is created after the rebate billing doc is created. Why? How can I check the configuration?
I have tried in the billing doc simulation transaction and got the following message.
Document "90000028" is not profit-related and thus could not be transferred
Message no. KF755
Diagnosis
Sales document "90000028" was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA. This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry
The sales document shows zero for the quantity
The sales document has been denied
The sales document is locked due to credit reasons
A rebate doc of course has no qty, and is a credit note, so how should I configure the COPA?
Thanks,
Vicki
Edited by: Po Yee Vicki CHAN on Jul 11, 2008 6:57 AM

Hi,
Check tcode KE4I (in IMG of CO-PA).
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Similar Messages

Billing doc not flown to A/C

Hi,
One billing doc.not flown to A/C,trying to release it manually but showing error -
"Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 JN7 A2."
Kindly help to resolve this issue.
Harsh

Hi
Kindly maintain the tax code in FTXP and relevant G/L account for the same
Go to FTXP enter the country & tax code after that select the tax accounts and maintain the same as below
KTOPL KTOSL MWSKZ KONTS KONTH
Chart of account Account key tax code G/l account
REgards
Damu
Edited by: Damodhar Reddy Chilukuri on Jan 18, 2010 5:42 AM

Billing doc error due t copa standard quantity

Hi I am facing an issue .this is regarding the error while releaseing a billing doc the errortranslating the quantity to the COPA standard quatity.
in material master i checked the unit of measure is SET and in copa KEA6 VVAUM( Alt Uom)
Error translating the quantity to the CO-PA standard quantity
Message no. K/832
Diagnosis
Customizing in Profitability Analysis CO-PA allows a standard quantity field to be updated.
An error has occurred in the present document while the standard quantity field "VVAUM" was being supplied.
The base unit of measure "SET" could not be translated into the standard unit of measure "M3" for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
System Response
It is not possible to process the document again.
Procedure
1. If required, maintain the unit of measure "M3" as an alternative unit of measure in the material master for the material "B/CAL/PROJECT5".
2. In certain cases, you should check whether derivation of the unit of measure for the CO-PA standard quantity field "VVAUM" needs to be changed in Customizing for CO-PA characteristic derivation
This is billing docments needs to be released . what is the problem some body can help me to resolve the issue
Arjun

Hi
I am assuming that you want to update qty in COPA with UoM M3
In MM02 - Maintain conversion of SET to M3
In KE4MS - Maintain M3 as the Standard Unit of Measure
In KE4M - Assign SD Qty field (FKIMG) to VVAUM
BR,Ajay M

Details from Billing doc line item in COPA

Hi,
We are posting billing docs with multiple ship-to parties on the different line items. In COPA I need to get hold of the ship-to party. There are no sales orders created in the process.
In neither the derivations (KEDR) nor in the user-exit am I able to get hold of the billing doc line item nr, as that is what I need to determine the ship-to party from the VBRP table.
Any ideas on how I can pick up the ship-to party from the billing doc?
Thanks in advance
Piet Strydom

HI,
Thanks for your response.
Yes, we have ship-to party at the line-item level. Technically it is stored on VBPA, but the access into VBPA is the billing doc and line item number.
I have not been able to find good (SAP) documentation for exit COPA0005, but what I did find warned against changing characteristics? That should be done in COPA0001. However, the RBELN and RPOSN fields are not populated yet.

Billing Doc not releasin for acccounting doc

Hi
After detail checking I have found that in customer master data>>Partner function tab, there is PY payer is required entry.
When I am going to release billing doc in VF02 system is giving error message
Customer 730 has no bank details of the bank type 0020
Message no. F5025
I do not want to maintain Bank Type in Payer Master data >> Payment transaction tab because these are optional fields.
Note: If I maintain this field in Payer Master data>>Payment transaction then its allowing me to release Billing Doc.
regards
imdad

Hi Imdad,
Please coordinate with your basis guy and check SAP Note 355859 is implemented in your system.
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap%28bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==%29/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=355859

Billing doc not generated

Hi,
There is a scenario like this:
Bring in stock, enter sales order, do delivery and billing.
A billing doc number is generated at the point of saving VF01.
But when going to VF02 to view the billing doc, an error message is recevied saying that the Billing document does not exist.
Message No of the received error msg is VF041
Diagnosis- The billing doc that you specified does not exist.
This doc was possibly archived.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
follow OSS-575906 & do the settings with ABAPER
Goto settings written below.
transaction SE91. If necessary, change the editor via 'Goto -> Change editor' to enter the paragraph formats more easily
VF041 "Billing document & does not exist"
U1 Diagnosis
AS The billing document you specified does not exist.
AS This document may have been archived.
Hope it may help you
Regards
JAGA

Billing doc not been generated

Hello,
i am trying to create a billing doc to delivery related SO.
i have the outbound delivery completed and now trying to create a billing doc but it says it has been fully invoiced even when we dont have any billing doc for it. the document flow as well doesnt show any invoice.
what might be the problem?
Thanks

Hello,
There could be number of reasons:
1. You do not have sufficient integration in VKOA
2. Accounting periods are being closed.
3. The Customer account has been blocked.
4. There may be a pricing error.
5. User do not have sufficient authorization to post an accounting document.
VFX3 should solve your problem. You release the documents to accounting, if there are errors check for log. Check the forum with search VFX3 for further help.
Regards,
Ravi

Changes in MM02 not reflecting in COPA lin item report

Hi,
In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
Regds

Hi,
in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

VF02 Billing doc Not appearing

Dear all,
I created almost 50 Billing documents ,If user wants to check any Billing Document in VF02/VF03 ,i can;t see any billing documents.
I checked in Table Level ,here all data is Stored...I mean data is there.
What could be the Problem.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
raj.

Hi Venky,
Go to the "VBRK" table and see If the billing document is there. If it is there , take that number and key in that number in VBFA and take the prevoius(DEL/ORDER) number and go to VL02N/VA02 and click on document flow, Check if the Billing document is shown ther or not. If it is not, check the status of the preceding document and It will tell you If it is billed or not. If it it check "V.01" and select Billing document check box and see if these documents are incomplete by any means(Even if it is incomplete system should show the document once it has allowed you to save it. I think you are getting the error message "BILLING DOC DOES NOT EXIST/ARCHIVED". You get this error some times when the database does not get updated. Check all of these and kindly let me know If you need any more help on this.
Regards
Ram Pedarla

Material regrouping in MM02 not reflecting in COPA report

Hi,
In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
Regds

Hi,
in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE Billing Doc not created

Hi All,
I am trying to create billing document using <b>BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE</b>. Please check code below for my BAPI preparation. Problem is billing document not getting created, in return table message type I Message ID VF Number 044 Message <b>The item is not relevant for billin</b>g and SUCCESS table is blank. If I use same sales order via VF01, billing document does get created.
I will commit once I get return S. But have you people come across such kind of message. Any ideas or sample code will be of much help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tim
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SALESORG   = gs_vbak-vkorg.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DISTR_CHAN = gs_vbak-vtweg.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DIVISION   = gs_vbak-spart.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DOC_TYPE   = GS_INIT_ITAB2-auart.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ORDBILLTYP = p_fkart.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SOLD_TO    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-kunnr.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITEM_CATEG = GS_INIT_ITAB2-pstyv.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-REQ_QTY    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-kwmeng.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SALES_UNIT = gs_vbap-vrkme.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-CURRENCY   = gs_vbak-waerk.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SHORT_TEXT = 'Test'.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-BILL_DATE = GS_INIT_ITAB2-afdat.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-REF_DOC    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DOC_NUMBER = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITM_NUMBER = GS_INIT_ITAB2-POSNR.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITEM       = GS_INIT_ITAB2-POSNR.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-NO_MATMAST = co_x.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-COUNTRY    = 'AUS'.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-MATERIAL   = gl_matnr.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-TAXCL_1MAT = '1'.
append GT_BILLINGDATAIN.
Prepare for BAPI call
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE'
    EXPORTING
      CREATORDATAIN         = GS_CREATORDATAIN
    TESTRUN               = co_x
    POSTING               = co_x
    TABLES
      BILLINGDATAIN         = GT_BILLINGDATAIN
    CONDITIONDATAIN       = GT_CONDITIONDATAIN
    CCARDDATAIN           =
    TEXTDATAIN            =
    ERRORS                =
      RETURN                = GT_RETURN
      SUCCESS               = GT_SUCCESS.

Dear,
It seems that you missed the reference document category field which is called "REF_DOC_CA" in that BAPI function.
And as you might know, the possible values are kept in the domain VBTYP (SD document category).
Regards,
Ki-Young
Edited by: Ki-Young Bae on Oct 24, 2011 4:52 AM

How to Transfer only VPRS to COPA, Billing Doc not relevant to accounting

Hi Gurus,
I have a scenario where Revenue and Taxes are posted in SD (And COPA) in a Billing document, but the COGS occurr in a later moment, in another Billing document. IT can occur days after the first billing document.
So we decided that we will send COGS to COPA through VPRS only in the second moment, so FI and COPA will be reconciliated.
The problem is that this second billing document only posts COGS via delivery document, and the Billing document is not relevant to accounting. But I need to send the COGS of VPRS from this billing document to COPA.
Do you know if there is a way to send This billing document to COPA even if it's not relevant to FI? With KE4S i'm not being sucessful.
Kind Regards
Mayumi

Thank you all for the replies. I was very helpful.
I coudn't use note 337488 to make COGS flow to COPA from PGI, because I had already mapped all the SD processes to flow COGS from VPRS and this pro-forma Billing Document was the only situation where I had a different scenario.
We decided to make a workaround, by changing the doc category in SD and the operation group, and we are releasing this billing dc to accouting by posting a debit/credit in FI (making it Zero), and this way we made it possible to generate COPA documento registering only the COGS through VPRS.
Kind Regards
Mayumi

My bill does not reflect the conversation I had with two representatives.

When I phoned to suspend service because I would be out of the country until the end of September, I asked two representatives on the two occasions I phoned to calculate what my charges would be for May. I was given a rough figure of $60 with the understanding that because Verizon bills are paid in advance, I would be only charged for a prorated amount for the days following my billing cycle renewal (the 29th) and the date suspension was to commence (5/1) plus $45 for the three lines being suspended. Instead, my bill reflects full charges adding up to $143+ as if I were using the service for the projected month (4/29-5/28). Can you explain? Please review those recorded phone conversations with your representatives for clarity.
Joanne
I cannot at this point phone as I've not yet sorted out phone service while in the UK. Thank you.
Private info removed as required by the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service
Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

As it seemed to take a long time for an email reply to my inquiry, I phoned
Verizon and worked out that it was case #2, that the bill had been generated
before the suspension. I've opted to pay it in full and leave a credit on
my account as of June when the adjustments are made.
BUT I have one more question: when I spoke with the representative to get
the above clarification, she mentioned that I would need to contact Verizon
on or before 29 July to generate another suspension until my return to the
USA on 29 September. But as I recall from my conversation with the agent to
set up the suspension, a note was made in my file that this suspension order
was to automatically renew saving me the need for a call or internet action
on my part. Can you look into that please as I will be traveling likely
without my computer or phone between 25 July and mid-first week of August to
Finland and it will be awkward to renew the suspension order that way. If
I've misunderstood and do, in fact, need to contact Verizon at the end of
July, might the order for renewal of the suspension be earlier than the
29th; say on the 24th or 25th?
Thank you,
Joanne (gunniejo)
please reply to my yahoo account (removed) as I almost never
use the google email account.
Private info removed as required by the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service
Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

Cancellation Billing doc not getting released to accounting

The original Billing document has been cancelled. But the accounting
document of the cancellation document has not been generated.
We are getting the error " Automatic clearing of billing document
90318566 and canc. doc. 7651735 not poss.Message no. VF208". We are in
ECC 6.0.
This error has come for the first time. what needs to be done ?.
thanks
amit

we are not maintaning this doc type , S1 in OBA7.
we have a z table , which is :
VKORG WERKS FKART NUMKI KTGRD
MSI         S1    66    10
MSI         ZAMC 53    10
MSI         ZBCM 53    10
MSI         ZBCO 53    10
MSI         ZBFB 53    10
MSI         ZBPR 53    10
MSI   DALS S1    66    10
MSI   DALS ZBCO 53    10
MSI   DALS ZBFB 53    10
It has been working since many years. Why this is not getting released, not able to get any clue ..

While adding KONA table in query(sq02), relevant billing doc not displayed

Hi experts,
When I am changing an existing query through sq02( I am joining table KONA with already existing tables VBRK & VBRP and adding fields , Agreement number & Validity date from & Valid till) , after execution , query displays 3 additional columns of Agreement number, Validity from & Validiy to, but it ceases to display records of those documents in which rebate is accrued. It only displays those documents where rebate basis is present in condition records of billing item data, but zero rebate is accrued.
Any suggestion are highly welcome.
Best Regards
Vimal

Hi Vimal,
Unfortunately, it is not possible to find out the list of invoices which have accrued to a rebate agreement. This is true not just for rebate for also for credit management as an example. If you want the list of sales orders which have resulted in the open order value in FD 32 for the credit customer, it is not possible.
This is true for every other functionality which uses the Infostructure update instead of normal table update. It is because infostructure update is always cumulative and table update is always record specific. When infostructure update gets a new value, the old value is erased. Hence it is not possible to find out the entire list of entries which contributed to the total value and we can only see the total value.
To sum it up, it is not possible to find out all the invoices which have resulted in the accrual value of a particular rebate agreement. Also it is not possible to find out all the sales orders, which resulted in the open order value of a credit customer in his credit master data in FD32. If this has to be done, it has to be done manually by using a complex logic.
If you want to find out the invoices relevant for rebate agreement, you need to find out all the invoices created within a timespan, find out all the partners, material etc. Then find out all agreements relevant for this period (or involving this period) involving the customer (payer/sold to party) and the material. Then match both the entries to get what you want. That is lot of work and even after that, accuracy of data is in question.

Rebate billing doc not reflected in COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for