Reconciliation and Consolidation 3 company codes

Dear Expert,
I have 3 company code use same Chart Of Account, Controlling Area, Depreciation Area, Currency, Country and fiscal years.
But i still confuse about :
1. G/L Reconciliation Account customer and vendor, do i create for each company codes ?
2. How do I consolidate for tree company codes ? what should i do ?
Any expert can explain my doubt ?
Thanks,
Iwan Siahaan
Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

Hi
Here is the scenario of having 3 company codes assigned to 8 plants and have 19 depots + one distribution center (similar to depot with slight changes
its clear plant assign to 3 company code,what about depots and distribution channale it work independent or assign to company code?
If depots are located in differnt city,then It should be plant not storage location and assign to 3 company code
then if it is the case what about Distribution center(functions as like depot with slight changes of sampling being done & no safety stock)?
Is it feasible & how to map this in SAP?
for this take help of sd guys
It may be plant or sale organization if not sale organization ,then create it plant ,but no manufacturing activity and not under MRP
Distribution center acts as co-coordinator for getting the goods from FG stores and sending to individual depots as per the requisition
This can be achive with Stock transfer between plant
Regards
Kailas ugale

Similar Messages

F.01 - extract to consolidation on company code level

Hi everyone
We're trying to do an extract to consolidation on company code level (1). When popup dialog "Filename for extraction file" appears we can choose between presentation server or application server.
When choosing presentation server and logical filename ECCS_FILE we get error GC027 (Error opening file c:\temp\EXTRACT_CS_CO.txt).
Doing so choosing application server however works (whereas path isn't the same).
We already checked and double-checked settings of logical file name and logical path in transaction FILE.
Any suggestions what to do or isn't it supposed to work via presentation server?
Thanks in advance and best regards to all
Renaud

I have not seen anything that you have mentioned to enter file path?
Is this being customised for your Company?
How did you download this before?

How to set standalone model and create local company code

HI,
For SRM5.0 or 7.0 , how to set standalone model ?, when I check attribute , the system warn me I must fill company code for BUK. I have no backend system .
thanks a lot
Jesse

Jesse,
You should define a Backend System using IMG setting 'Define Backend Systems' as a non-sap backend system and use it with BUK attribute.
SG

"Bill to" Customer and sales order company code

Hi friends,
Can you please tell me that in sales order, what is the "Bill To" customer? Is it "Sold-to party" or "Ship-to party" or something else? In which table is it stored and what is the field name?
In which table I can find the company code related to a sales order?
Thanks and Regards,
Netrey

Hi Netrey,
Ship-to-party is nothing but to which party the material has to be shipped
Sold-to-party is nothing but to which party the material has be sold
Regarding Bill-to-Party, go through the below example
If a company has a headquarters in Banglore and it has branches in Chennai, Hyderabad and Pune.
If the people from chennai branch require some goods and they will look for a vendor and they will buy from him .
they will ask the vendor to send the bill to their headquarters in banglore and ship the goods to their chennai location.
for the above example
Ship-to-Party is chennai office
Sold-to-Party is chennai office
Bill-to-party is Banglore Head quarters.
Regarding the company code, it is stored in the table VBAK and the field name is
BUKRS_VF.
If i am wrong please correct me.
Regards,
Phani.

Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

" There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

Hi,
As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
Use the validation process to restrict these errors
This may help
Regards
Shantanu

Transporttaion Cross Docking between EWM and ECC across company codes

Seceanrio is as follows:
We have an EWM managed site in GB, and an IM managed site in IE.
We would like to use the transportation cross docking solution from within Service Parts Management to transfer goods from GB to IE, (ECC > EWM > ECC) across company codes.
Is this possible within the standard SAP solution?
Thanks in advance,
Craig Bramhald

Hi Hari
Inter Company Purchase scenario works when the same material exists in both the company codes... I dont know how SAP would manage this in the case of Assets, when the Same Asset No is not existent in the other Co Code...
However, Refer 1523976 PurchaseOrderERPRequest_In_V1:Asset account assignment fails
This applies to EhP4 / EhP5 - But I dont know if you are using the enterprise service PurchaseOrderERPRequest_In_V1 ....
If not, better create an OSS message to SAP and check with them mentioning the notes that you have mentioned in your message
BR,Ajay M

Transfer asset from one company code and to another company code

Hi Guru
we have one issue in transfering of asset from one company code to another company code by tocde ABT1N as we get the error transaction type cannot be used for activity retmet from interco.transfer w/o rev to affil.co message no aapo176
any appropriate method to do transfer and what is the settings we should take care for this
kind regards
sunitha
Edited by: sunitha reddy on Sep 1, 2010 2:22 PM

Hi Sunitha,
You should also check the following customizing settings in case of AAPO176 in ABT1N:
It could be that your transaction type that is mentioned in your error code AAPO176 cannot be used for 'Acquisition from intercompany transfer'.
In this case check the default transaction types your customizing in Asset Accounting - Transactions - Specify Default Transaction Types.
Check if the same default transaction type for 'Acquisition from INTERcompany transfer' is also used for 'Acquisition from INTRAcompany transfer'.
If not, then this is possibly the reason for the error AAPO176.
The transaction types for 'Acquisition from intercompany transfer' AND 'Acquisition from intracompany transfer' should be same as the standard transaction type 158 (please also review SAP note 196012). Both transaction types must be customized the same if you use your own customized transaction types...if one is different than the other, that would also be a reason for AAPO176 to be triggered.
I hope this information helps in addition.
Kind regards,
Brigitte

Reconciliation account invalid in company code

Dear All
I am creating a new company code for in which i have assigned chart of account from standard company code 1000 which i copied to co.cd 2511
also all assignment done in oba3 oba4 fs00 but still error comes"Account 100009 is an invalid reconciliation account for company code 2511"
Please help

Hi Shantanu,
There can be multiple reasons for this error.
Please help us with the long text of the error.
Tips:
1. Make sure that the account is created in your specific company code in FS00.
2. Make sure that the account is created as a Balance Sheet account in FS00.
3. Make sure that the account is marked either as D or K as per your requirement.
4. Make sure that the account is having a relevant Reconciliation related field status group (example: 0067).
BR,
Zubin

Company code consolidation

I have a question regarding Company consolidation.
I have five company codes each using the same Chart of account. Now I want to do the consolidation of company codes. How do I go about it ? Please advise the best method.
Can I use the group chart of account and create a financial statement version and select the group account numbers in it ?
If that is the case, I am doubtful about how we can adjust inter-unit business eliminations, etc.
When do we need to use EC-CS ? Should I use this in my scenario ? Do I need to create a group chart of account for EC-CS and assign the same to the operational chart of accounts ?
If my company codes use different chart of accounts, how the same company codes are consolidated ?
Please guide me briefly.
Regards

hi
pls go through this link
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/ECCS/ECCS.pdf
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/56/4bea2cd58b11d3b58d006094b9c996/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/56/4bea2fd58b11d3b58d006094b9c996/frameset.htm
thanks & Regards
phaneendra

Payroll Posting to multiple Company Codes in FI and CO possible?

Dear experts,
I need your help on the following challenging issue with respect to payroll posting to accounting.
Is it possible for a payroll that runs in one company code for all employees, to post to FI and CO for multiple CoCds?
Example:
WT 1234 exists in HR CoCd 1000 (assume an amount of u20AC 100 in the payroll results)
G/L ABC exists in FI CoCd 1000
G/L DEF exists in FI CoCd 2000
CCtr xyz exists in CO CoCd 1000 (which is the employee's master cost centre)
CCtr uvw exists in CO CoCd 2000
The wage type should be mapped as follows:
+ 100 to G/L ABC and CCtr xyz (this is no problem, is realized with standard mapping)
- 100 to G/L DEF and CCtr uvw
The challenge is in the fact that the credit amount should go to another company code than the debit amount.
How can I realize this?
Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Jeroen

This is from SAP documentation:
Cross-company code transactions are characterized by the fact that payables are assigned to a company code other than the one in which the corresponding expenses arose. This results in receivables and payables between company codes.
If you want to post these receivables and payables to company code clearing accounts, you must make the settings in several steps, as outlined in the following.
Note that in the case of separate HR/AC systems, posting to company code clearing accounts can only be implemented if the AC system is in Release 4.5A or higher.
For more information on cross-company code transactions and business considerations, refer to the SAP Library under Payroll -> country -> Subsequent Activities -> Posting to Accounting -> Special Business Requirements for Posting -> Cross-Company Code Transactions.
Settings for Posting to Company Code Clearing Accounts
1. In the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you must assign an account determination type to each symbolic account in Human Resources. For specific postings to balance sheet accounts, the account assign types FL and FO are used. From a technical viewpoint, these account assignments are defined as follows:
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FL are posted in accordance with the information from the last period in the WPBP table (Work Center Basic Pay) for the current original result.
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FO are only used for posting in the evaluation of a current original result.
2. In the step Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types, you must assign the symbolic accounts with the account assignment types FL and FO to the corresponding wage types:
You assign the symbolic accounts with account assignment type FL to wage types that, in the case of retroactive accounting, contain the difference between old and new payment amounts. In countries that use the principle of origin, this usually involves wage types /551 Recalculation difference and /552 Subsequent clearing from previous month.
You assign symbolic accounts with the account assignment type FO to wage types that contain payments to employees and whose amounts do not change in the case of retroactive accounting. This usually involves wage types /557 Cash payment, /558 Payment of balance, /559 Transfer and other, country-specific wage types.
3. In the step Create Posting Variants, you must set the Post to company-code clearing account indicator for the variants that you use. Otherwise, payables and receivables between company codes are not posted to company code clearing accounts, and remain as the balance on the document split account for the company codes affected.

Issue in Assignment of company codes to controlling area TKAO2 and OKKP

Hello Gurus,
I configured company code and controlling area in development client and transport to Testing client.But in QA client I can see in the Table TKA02 and respective assignment of company code to controlling area .But if I am checking in TCode OKKP and selecting Controlling area and checking the company codes assisgment there is no asssisgmnet. is this issue relating to transport as I am FICO consultant not geting solution.
This issue pertain to only one controlling area other controlling area with there company code assignment is correct.
Thanks a lot
Edited by: Manu Rathore on Apr 7, 2011 8:56 AM
Edited by: Manu Rathore on Apr 7, 2011 8:58 AM

Hello Balaji,
But I transport everything through one transport request and I haven't maintain any sequence.can this issue be due to mine non maintaining of sequence in transport request or something else?
if so How to solve it.
Many Many Thanks
Manu

OBYA : vendor and customer clearing in cross company code transaction

Hi Gurus,
Please can any one telll me how to clear the transactions of cross company code which is in vendor and customer.
I already done a configuration in OBYA for customer - vendor.
Expected a process of clearing the cross company code transaction.
Thanks in Advance
Manish.

Hi,
If you are doing for vendor invoice,
for example:
co code 1000 and co.code2000
Use F-02 and enter following transactions
posting key 31 -vendor- company code 1000
posting key 25- expenses and enter new company code 2000.
After the entry it will display 4 line items, 2line item for 1000&2000
Regards,
Sreekanth

"Posting only possible in 2003/08 and 2003/07 in company code 1000"

hi all,
i am working inside new IDES system.
i did not initialize the company code for the year 2008 and i have already created the mmr so system is not allowing me to initialize the company code for the year 2008. now i am trying to create GR for the material the system is showing the above message. i have also tried to close the period from MMPV transaction code i.e. started from 07/2003 until 01/2008 but when i am coming to close 01/2008 it is not executed anymore and taking me to one message box i.e. incorrect period entered in co. code.
desperately need help for this issue to post GR.
regards / faruque

First go to OB29 and check the Fiscal Year Variant is V3 or not. If not change it to V3 and assign to company code thru. OB37.
Now check in OB52 whether the entries are same as follows:
1000 + 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008 SPPE
1000 A ZZZZZZZZZZ 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008
1000 D ZZZZZZZZZZ 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008
1000 K ZZZZZZZZZZ 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008
1000 M ZZZZZZZZZZ 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008
1000 S ZZZZZZZZZZ 1 2002 12 2008 13 2008 16 2008
Now delete the Plant assignment to Company code and save. Then go to OMSY trxn code Select the Company code and give the Current Year & current period and save. Assign the plant to company code.
CAUTION : IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT THIS PROCESS SHOULD NOT BE DONE IN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Apart from the above, please go thru the previous threads.
Revert back in case doubts.
Reg,
Ashok

Cross Company code Settings

Dear Friends Goodmorning,
We have One company , and Two company codes, A and B
One company Code (A) Make a Purchases in F-43
Another Company Code (B) will make a payment: F-53
What is the Configuration Need? Please help me what is the configuration need this setttings
Thanks
Babu.

Specific business transactions with trading partners
Several business transactions that occur frequently in the various operative applications - as
relating to their trading partner assignments -- are described more closely:
FI/Financial Accounting
- Customer or vendor invoice: The trading partner is copied from the customer or vendor
master record and is duplicated in the offsetting entries. Only one trading partner may
occur in the document.
- Invoice receipt against clearing account and transfers with clearing: If you do not post an
incoming invoice directly to an expense account, but instead against a clearing account,
the selection of open items must be restricted to those of a certain trading partner when
posting the transfer later on; the same trading partner is automatically copied onto the
transfer line item.
- Customer or vendor payment: You can configure the document type for payments to
allow for more than one trading partner in a payment document. Then, the trading
partner is copied only into the customer or vendor line items.
- Down payments and down payment clearings are always customer- or vendor-related
and are, therefore, handled like the invoices described above.
AA/Asset Accounting
- Asset transfers between company codes: If a fixed asset is transferred to another
company code, two posting documents are required - one for each company code. The
trading partner of each document must be set with the company ID of the other company
code, respectively.
MM/Materials Management
- When receiving goods from an affiliated vendor, the trading partner is taken from the
vendor mentioned on the order for the inventory entry and the goods/invoice receipt. If
invoices are still open on the balance sheet key date, group-internal provisions are
created from the clearing account for goods/invoice receipts. These provisions can later
be eliminated in the Consolidation system using the trading partner assignment.
- Order-related invoice receipts also derive the trading partner from the vendor on the
order and duplicate it into the offsetting entries.
- Material transactions across company codes automatically derive the trading partner
from the company code assignments.
CO/Cost Accounting
- Cross-company code CO settlements are transferred periodically using adjusting entries
to Financial Accounting via the reconciliation ledger. The trading partner is derived from
the company code, which, in turn, comes from the respective CO posting object being
addressed. These are always dual settlements, whereby the trading partner can always
be uniquely identified.

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

Reconciliation and Consolidation 3 company codes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for