Reg.PO raising for services

HI
When I raise a PO against "Services" the error message "Please maintain services or limits : Message no SE029
You cann't enter data unitll the PO item has been maintained correctly.":
Inthis case what I should do. Please help me.
Thanks
Rajakumar

Dear Kumar,
When create A service PO, then you need to fill out the service number or if u dont user service master then just fill in the short text , UoM, and gross price, or maintain the limit.
Its in the PO item --Services tab and Limit Tab.
<i>Note:And please kindly mark the other question that you post before as answered if the old issue is already solved.</i>
Thanks and Regards,
w1n

Similar Messages

Reg:Delivery complete indicator for service PO

Dear all,
I have configured delivery completed incator for the specific field selection group for the particular plant for service PO's also i have activated in inventory management the same indicator for that plant but for service PO document type i dont get that indicator . Is there any specific settings to be done plz guide
regards
VKK

Hi,
Have you checked the field settings for the below field selction keys, because the field status follows the link rule and priority is assigned based on that.
Field selection keys:
- Transaction: E.g ME21N, ME32, ME33 etc.
- Activity Category: Create AKTH, Change AKTV, Display AKTA & Extend PO AKTE
- Document type: UBF for UB, NBF for NB
- Item category: is determined in combination with the document category.
First two characters consist of letters PT, third item category and fourth document category:
A for RFQs, B for PRs, F for POs, K for contracts, L for SAs. e.g PT3F for a SC item in a PO.

Delivery Completed Indicator for Services

Hi Guys
In PO's, in the delivery tab, the Delivery Completed Indicator appears only for Stock PO's. Is it possible to make the Delivery Completed Indicator appear for non stock PO's as well, I mean for services?
Thanks

Hi,
It is not possible to setup Delivery Completed Indicator For Services Purchase orders or Non stock Items.
Reg,
Ashok
Rewards welcome.

SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000 error

Hello all,
We have raised a Shopping cart for a service with reference to a contract with the account assignments item category "D" and account assignment category "P". the product type is 02 for the service. The shopping cart saves fine however when trying to transfer to create the PO in the backend we are getting the error "SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000"
we have checked all the notes below:
1064139 already implemented.
1222877 already implemented.
767284 failed to correct the error.
1140132 should be in our system but has been removed by note 1226132. I have checked all the other notes but they do not seem relevant in our scenario. Does anybody have any idea as to how we should solve this problem?
Thanks

Hi Andrew!
There are other notes related to this issue. Please verify if they can help you.
1244427    SE518 error in external requirement service shoppin
1236355    BAPI_PO_CREATE1:Purchase Order created with ref. to
1226132    SE518 Error message from back-end system for servic
1030206    BAPI: Multiple service type items cannot be created
1398742    Error message SE 518 PO transfer to backend
Best regards,
Christian Zeuch

Automatic GL account pick for service PO

When I raise PO with account assignment u2018 Ku2019 it ask cost center and pick the GL account automatically from OBYC table. But when I raise PO for service with item category u2018 D u2019 and account assignment u2018 k u2018 it picks different GL account. I think that GL account pick which is assigned for service material group. Any one can tell me how and where from that GL account pick. Anywhere else GL account is assigned for service material group?

Hi,
In the SPRO you have groups defined and for these service group you assign the valuation class.
Path - SPRO - MM - Purchasing - Material Master - Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master
Then in OBYC against these valuation class you assign the GL accounts.
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Service entry sheet:No provision for service entry for purchase order

Hi.I create a Purchase order with one item.The Item category was D(Service).Also lines of Service number was input in the Service tab of the item detail.After save the Purchase order,I goto t-code ML81N to Maintain the Service entry sheet.When I input the Purchase order number and item number and press enter,the SAP raise an error message box with following text:
No provision for service entry for purchase order 4500000149 00010
Message no. SE198
Diagnosis
The "GR =NO" (no goods receipts) indicator has been set in the PO item. It is thus not possible to enter services against this purchase order.
I don't know why and how to resolve this problem.So I need the experts to give me some advice.Thank you so much.
Regards
Yoda

pls check in ur PO at item details in delivery tab whether goods receipt checkbox is unticked.if yes then tick it and then process.
regards,
indranil

Intercompany billing for services

Hi,
I need a few details about intercompany billing, and how is thi set in SAP standard way...
Is it possible to set that company A create a purchase order for services and another company B creates on this PO sales invoice, and on the company A is then invoice verification done automaticaly.
Can you please provide me details about intercompany billing?
Thanks + BR
Saso

Hello,
For this refer intercompany for order related billing.Choose billing type IVA.Maintain copying control accordingly.For services delivery is not required.
In this when company B provides services to customer and raise intercompany bill to company A, and then company will raise Bill to End customer.
Follow the std settings of intercompany except copy control for billing type (OR---IVA)
Revert for further clarification.
Regards
Amit Gupta

How to get the version no. for service po?

Hi,
How to get the version no. for service po?For material po we are getting the version from EKKO-REVNO but for service po Ekko-revno is blank.
Regards,
Rachel.

Hiee,
It is not like service PO does not have revision.
REVNO will only exists for any document if amendment is made after releasing it. If in EKKO for all service PO revision number is blank then test if version management is active for document type
MM->Purchasing->Version management -> External documents
Here check for your doc type and purchase org version management is active.
Regs,
Appie

Record assigned entry different for service requests and incidents

Hi
I've noticed something recently when using/implementing service manager that the record assignment formats are different depending on if you are assigning an incident or service request.
For example when assigning an incident the record assignment shows the display names of the user being assigned (eg the incident is assigned to Joe Bloggs) however for a service request it shows as assigned to domain\jbloggs.
Is there any reason for the difference between the 2 and can it be standardised as we use the work item action log to send assignment notifications to the affected users and while it's great for incidents it doesn't look good for service requests

Unfortunately, this is just a text property and this different behaviour is hard-coded into SCSM and cannot be changed. Different people worked on the IR and SR forms and there are many inconsistencies. You could try raising a support case for it I suppose
but I would not think it likely to be changed.
Rob Ford scsmnz.net
Cireson www.cireson.com
For a free SCSM 2012 Notify Analyst app click
here

Double billing for service period july6th-

Does anyone else have this issue?...I am being DOUBLE BILLED for service period july6th- august 5th. I already paid my bill online well before the due date, and did get a confirmation number for the payment made. The payment was deducted from my bank. However, today, I logged in to my account to see that I have a huge outstanding balance for the service period july 6th- august5th. The amount of the bill is even different than the bill that I paid for that service period.

Yes I saw that on my account also. I did notice that the pmt due was past the due date (actually due the same time period as the last bill that was pd). How can that be when it shows my bill was pd in full at that time? Also in reviewing this so called "bill" I noticed that they raised the rate again even after I changed my services to a newer oneand less expensive one. Going to call them in the morning as I should be billed once a month around the same time each month not twice for something I have already pd. Also for the past several months internet, tv, phone and actual apps for this company have been very crappy too. Moving so I'm sure this will not be my service provider after my move. Its getting worse not better.

WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id

Hello
our central manager frequently reports for one WAE
WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 62.
WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61.
But the WAE seems to run nornal and we can't find eny problem and event on the WAE (7341 device). By screening the CCO documentaion we also couldn't find any explanation for this error log.
We have an installation with app. 30 WAEs/WAVEs in with software release 4.2.3.
Could you please provide us some hints for troubleshooting.
Many thanks in advance!

Hello
I have the same issue and I noticed when we install a new location with two waves and wccp, it has for some reason an impact on exicting waves running in wccp mode:
the alarm ''WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61 or 62'' riased on locations that were already in production.
new location : 192.168.X.21 is one of the new wave, 192.168.X.219 is the 2nd wave.A.B.C.D is the router loopback ip address
A.B.C.D
Existing waves (on different locations) already running in WCCP are : 192.168.Y.64.
Router (192.168.M.52) for another location where waves : 192.168.M.50 & 192.168.M.52 are already in service: Loopback ip is E.F.G.H
any idea why configuring wccp in one location has an impact on other locations
thnak you in advance
2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 12. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500012: New router notified. Rtr_Id A.B.C.D for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.219 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.219 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 12. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500012: New router notified. Rtr_Id A.B.C.D for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.219 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:41 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.219 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 13. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 13. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:55:54 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router A.B.C.E for service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:56:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 08:56:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 622011 Dec 14 08:58:55 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-3-500078: Raising WCCP missing assignment alarm: WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 61.2011 Dec 14 08:58:55 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-3-500078: Raising WCCP missing assignment alarm: WCCP missing assignment alarm for service id: 62.2011 Dec 14 08:59:03 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 14. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:59:03 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 14. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 08:59:19 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 08:59:19 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 622011 Dec 14 08:59:31 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500028: Removing web cache 192.168.X.21 due to timeout for service 61.2011 Dec 14 08:59:31 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500028: Removing web cache 192.168.X.21 due to timeout for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 15. Service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router E.F.G.H for service 61.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500008: A new view from the router 192.168.M.52 with the given change number: 15. Service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500014: New device notified 192.168.X.21 for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:01:53 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-5-500026: New entry being created for 192.168.X.21 is seen by router E.F.G.H for service 62.2011 Dec 14 09:02:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 612011 Dec 14 09:02:09 N064WAP1009 wccp: %WAAS-WCCP-4-500016: No assignment sent: 192.168.Y.64 is not seen by all routers for service 62

Automatic invoice generation for service contract

Hello,
I want to create the automatic invoicce generation for service contract based on the order.
whenever i raise service contract order system should create the invoice automatically.
could please let me know the settings?

Hi JP Reddy
You can schedule VF04/VF06 for your requirement, such that VF06 will run every 15/30 minutes and will generate billing document for your contracts automatically.
Else go for Z extension development which will assign as output type to your contract and once triggered it will create invoice.
try and revert

MRP for Service Order

Hi Friends,
My client want to run the MRP according to Material Group and according to service order.What are the possible ways to run the MRP? How my problem can be resolved?Please reply...
Regards,

Hi Edit,
The question is not to run MRP for Service materials, - to run MRP for the Materials in a Service Order.
I have one service order in which I have raised requirement for 10 materials (eg. Raw materials).
MRP can be run Plant wise or Material wise.If I run Plant wise MRP, system will gather all the requirement that are required in the plant (including Sales order, Service order, Prod order etc..).
If I run the MRP Material wise, system will gather the requirement of that material in all types of orders.
But the requirement is to run the MRP only for a particular Service order (only for the materials and quantities required in the given Service order) and generate PR and PO for procurement. The material may also be required for another service order, sales order or prod order. MRP should not gather the requirement for other orders.
Hope my explanation is clear. Prasanna, please post the correct scenario if there are any deviation in my understanding of your query.
I am also Looking for the solution. If any one have idea please help us to solve the issue.
Thanks,
Babu.K

Where to configure account for service entry?

Hi,
As we know that in material purchasing, we set GR/IR account in WRX of OBYC, then in material goods receipt, system will post to GR/IR account.
But we need to use another account for service entry of service purchasing. Where should we set the account in OBYC?
Thanks in advance.
Wesley

Hi,
for account determination system treats Services same as materials, end of the day it is the reciept posted using mvt 101 only,
If you need to dsitinguish your G/L accounts for materials and service then assign a seperate valuation class to your service master and setup diff G/L accounts for your valuation class
WRX assignment for service behaves bit differently ,Check Oss note 165692 and 64204 - it has detail explanation
Hope this helps
Reg
Dheeraj

Error in Workflow for Service Confirmation

Hello,
We are using SAP SRM 7.0 for our project with Extended classical scenario. We need to build a workflow for Service confirmation approval. We are supposed to use the Process controlled workflows.
I am using the standard workflow template WS40000014 (Process controlled). In SWETYPV, i have activated the event linkage for BO '/SAPSRM/CL_WF_PDO_SC' and event 'READY_FOR_WORKFLOW' for the template WS40000014. Rest everything is untouched.
Now when I am trying toe trigger the workflow by creating a confirmation in the SRM Portal, the confirmation is created successfully but when I see the workflow log, I can see the step 'Create Decision Set' in the task TS40007938 in the status 'ERROR'. Upon drilling, the error text says :
"Work item 000000005074: Object /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF method CREATE_DECISION_SETS cannot
Message no. WL821
"Error raised in business class ''"
Is there anything missing in the config which I need to check? Please help!
Thanks in advance.

Hi there,
This kind of error usually means:
[1] The triggering user does not have the correct authorization to
    execute the agent assignment of the first step
- Please trigger the workflow with a user with SAP_ALL in order
      to test if this is the case.
[2] The business object instance is not being passed to your workflow
    and so the initial step cannot be created or executed. Please
    check the binding to make sure the instance is passed at
    designtime and also runtime (Via technical log -> workflow
    container).
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Reg.PO raising for services

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for