Reg the effect of result analysis kka2

Hi All,
I am doing some enhancement for transaction KKA2 where I am changing the cost elment value in my coding where can I see the new cost element that I have changed in the enhancement?I mean after doing result analysis where can I see the cost elment that it has posted(in this case the new cost element that I have changed)?
Regards
mahesh

In order to comply with accounting standards, the value of work completed on projects in progress need to be capitalized. RA is used for this purpose.
For cost based RA, first calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when RA is properly configured.
This is suitable for consturction projects.
Revenue based:
Here the starting point is revenue.
POC = actua revenue / plan revenue
calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sridhar

Similar Messages

Result analysis (KKA2)

What are the business prerequisites for the use of revenue-based, cost-based and quantity-based percentage of completion in the result analysis (KKA2)

In order to comply with accounting standards, the value of work completed on projects in progress need to be capitalized. RA is used for this purpose.
For cost based RA, first calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when RA is properly configured.
This is suitable for consturction projects.
Revenue based:
Here the starting point is revenue.
POC = actua revenue / plan revenue
calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sridhar

Transaction Currency in Result Analysis - KKA2

Hi,
We have a Z program to calculate WIP for projects at the end of the month. This program in turn calls transaction KKA2 - Result Analysis. We have EUR as controlling area currency and INR as object currency (CC currency). Our projects have INR as project currency but the transactions are booked in USD EUR SGD and INR. We want to calculate WIP in transaction currency.
We checked and found that COSB table is updated with values in controlling area currency EUR and object currency INR. but transaction value(COSB-WTGXX) is not updated when we do KKA2. COSB is always updated with object currency(INR) and CO area currency(EUR) while value in transaction currencies are blank.
We tried to set transaction currency as default for project with transaction RPXN- CO-OM Information System: Settings but that did not help. We checked and found that in controlling area configuration indicator 'All currencies' is selected.
Will you please let me know if there is a way to update COSB with transaction currency values with configuration changes in Result Analysis version used for KKA2 or any other means?
Thanks for your help.
With Regards

Hi,
the requirement is bit surprising to me.
transaction currency is normally related to FI related transactions. Because either the you might bill to the customers in a currently other than co.code currency if it is required by the contract with customer or you might get bills from the vendor in a currency other than your co.code currency
This should not have any bearing on the controlling stuff.
When you post the values to CO, the values will be converted in to object currency and controlling area currency.
Result Analysis calcution will necessarily be in co.code and controlling area currency. There is no transaction currency involved here.
Hope this clarifies your question
Best Regards
surya

Project Results Analysis KKA2 Enhancement

In SPRO - Project System - Revenue & Earnings- Automatic & Periodic
Allocation - Result Analysis - Edit result analysis key & version -
Maintain Result analysis version,
If, CO Area 1000 & RA Version 0 selected, system is not allowing cross-
company valuation check box activation due to "Transfer to Financial
accounting active" check box is selected.
However if "Transfer to Financial accounting active" check box is un-
selected, system is allowing to save with option "cross-company
valuation" check box. But during KKA2, system is showing error due
to "version relevant to settlement" is selected.
Now the problem is that, if "cross-company valuation check box" is not
selected the system is not skiping steps as mentioned in screen.
Hence, enhancement KKAG0001 cannot be activated.
Kindly provide the solution.

Do you have an OSS ID? There is a document to describe the setting of RA for IAS in service.sap.com/erp, access the sub-node of management accounting -> product cost accounting -> media library.
Or access the URL
[https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700006305122006E.PDF]
If you don not have any OSS ID, please reply my message.
Flex Yang

Results Analysis KKA2

Hi All,
Assuming all the RA settings done , what do we achieve by running t code KKA2?
Does it generate any FI , COPA documents or it just shows you costs and revenues associated with the WBS element.
Regards,
Reddy

Hi,
Any expenses booked against a cost object (Project, WBS, Work Order, etc) are posted to expense accounts and shown in P&L statement. After the project / work order is complete, the expenses need to be capitalised to a Balance Sheet accout (inventory, asset, etc.). The process is called settlement. However, if a project / work order is still in work-in-progress at the end of a fiscal period, the accumulated expenses need to be temporarily capitalized to a balance sheet account to obtain an accurate financial statement (BS and P&L) for that fiscal period. This temporary capitalization process is called result analysis.
Thanks,
Rau

Results Analysis Message KJ436

While setting up Results Analysis for the POC method (03) and executing transaction KKA2, we got the following message. Both the CO version and the RA version are set to the same valuation (Group valuation). Any help would be appriciated.
Basic RA version must have valuation category "0" (operational valuation)
Message no. KJ436
Diagnosis
If a version has actual data (see basic version setting), it must be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of version of results analysis).
If a version does not have actual data (see basic version setting), it cannot be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of the version of results analysis).
Procedure
1. Check the basic version setting in the maintenance of the general versions.
2. Modify the results analysis version to conform to the basic version setting.
3. Turn the indicator Version relevant to settlement on or off, whichever is appropriate.We are using CO plan version 0 (see below) and it is set for actual and plan. The RA version (0) (also below) is marked as being relevant to settlement. These settings seems to address the error message but I guess we are missing something.

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

Stastical Costs on WBS in result analysis

Dear Gurus,
At my client scenario, I am using valuated project stock. Normally in case of valuated project stock, actual cost does not get updated on WBS element at the time of good receipt from PO account assigned to WBS Element.
But I referred SAP note 533207 to achieve actual cost on WBS Element.
As per note, I have created cost element with category 90 for Balance sheet GL account (called at the time of good receipt).
Due to this, at the time of goods receipt, statistical cost gets posted on WBS Element and seen as actual cost on WBS Element reports (This is solving our reporting requirement).
But when I run result analysis (KKA2) on partiular WBS Element, system does not consider this actual cost (stastical cost posted on WBS Element).
It seems system is not considering statistical costs on WBS Element in result analysis (KKA2).
Is there any way to achieve this (consideration of stastical costs on WBS Element in result analysis)
Thanks and Regards,
Parimal

Hi All,
Thanks for your replies....I also appreciate that stastical cost can not be considered as actual cost in result analysis.
But in case of valuated project stock, if stock is available for WBS Element and not issued to production order or any other receiver, under which category the value of WBS stock is to be shown in result analysis.
Is there any other period end function to be carry out specifically for stock valuation or
how to represent it in results of project period end procedures

Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

Hi Experts
My client has two company codes.
CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi,
I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration. There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
Thanks
Naveen

Results analysis data is calculated through sales order

Hi All,
I m trying to calculate WIP of one process Order through KKAX. But I am getting the below error
Results analysis data is calculated through sales order 300002423 001000
Message no. KJ112
Diagnosis
The order you selected for WIP calculation or results analysis is assigned to a sales order. A results analysis key was entered for this sales order.
System Response
The system determines results analysis data for orders assigned to sales order items through the results analysis for the sales order.
Procedure
Carry out results analyis on sales order 300002423 001000.
This process Order is related to Sales Order and I have checked the Result Analysis key is attached to Sales Order.
Please help me out in this issue.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
I was getting the above error because a RA key was selected ar Sales Order, Now what I have done is I have removed the RA Key from Sales Order, there is already a RA key attached to Process Order. Now When i am calculating KKAX (WIP) I am getting below message
The order is not a WIP element
Message no. KJ148
I have done this because my client is not using KKA3(RA fro Sales Order)
Please help!!!!!!!!!
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Result Analysis Key

Hi Experts,
Can any one tell me the significance of Result Analysis Key for an Internal order master record. Why do we use a result analysis key?
Points Awaiting!!!
Yasmin

Hi
R.A key is just like capitalzation key, which capitalise The WIP .Cost carrier is RA type cost element, which sucks the open production order value(normally at the time of period end closing) and put them on balance sheet till it is closed . If u need more information look for PDF file"Product cost made easy" released by SAP, you can download this from Yahoo group (Sapficoworld) by clicking on "files" there
assign points if useful

Results Analysis cost elements

Hello,
The Results Analysis saves the Results Analysis data under secondary cost elements. These cost elements can be determined thru assignment to Line IDs in the transaction OKG4 (OKGA) u201CUpdate of WIP Calculation and Results Analysisu201D, or they can be determined in the definition of Result Analysis Version (transaction OKG2 or OKG9) in the section u201CCost Elements: Results Analysis Datau201D of the Extended Control.
Could you please tell me when the system saves the Results Analysis data under cost elements specified in OKG4/OKGA and when under cost elements specified in Results Analysis Version in OKG2/OKG9 ? How do you control this?
Best regards,
Robert

Hi Sarada,
thank you for your reply.
However in Results Analysis Version in OKG2 I see the Technical RA Cost Element only in simplified control (Costs Elements Off). In u201CCosts Elements Onu201D control I see the following Cost Elements for Results Analysis Data:
1. Valuated Actual Costs
2. Calculated Costs
3. Capitalized Profit
4. Calculated Revenue
5. Revenue in Excess of Billing
6. Revenue Surplus
When are these cost elements used?
In my KKBC_KUN report I can see some of these cost elements (1 u2013 4), but with 0 values, whereas WIP and COS/Revenue cost elements assigned to Line IDs have positive valuesu2026
Robert

RE: Role of FI/CO consultant in Result Analysis

hi gurus
can u explain the Importance of result analysis and what is role of FI/CO consultant. What is process of result analysis. How is will be useful .

Hi Anand,
I have q question regarding service order process.
1.I have created a service contract and service order and costs are allocated on this order. Status of this order is - REL .I did result analysis for this order through KKA1 after that i did settlement by T-code KKO88. The costs on this order have been posted to FI debited to WIP account ( B/S ) and credited to P&L account.
2.Now iI have changed the status of this order to TECO.
can you please let me know how to proceed further regarding result analysis and settlement to credit the WIP account ( B/s ) and debit the P&L account because the order status is TECO
Regards
Ravi Kumar

Result Analysis..... KAKK

hi All,
I am running the KAKK and i getting wrong calculations...
I have created the purcahse order with 2 line items in SD....
For the first line item is 1 stock and
Second line item also with 1 stock...
I have also done the Delivery and invoice for the First line item and it is ok ....
For the Second line item i have done the half of the deliivery I:e (.5EA) and also invoice for the half.....
So when i do the Reulst ANlysis in KAKK
For the first item, the result analysis is correct because 1EA was delivered & billed (so nothing remaining in WIP).
The second item result analysis is not as per expectation. Since a partial qty (0.5 EA) was billed to customer (vendor invoice also for 0.5EA), there should be nothing in WIP.
For the second item, the result analysis it should be:
RANI = $1250.00 (which is correct -> half of $2500 PR00 price)
COS = $1000.00 (which is wrong -> half of $2000 cost)
WIP = 0 (because whatever was billed by vendor was also billed to the customer; so nothing in WIP).
This error is happening only for the Second line itme...ZTS1 drop-ships.
Please let me know if any suggestions for the above .......
Thanks and Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
Edited by: Ranjit kumar on Aug 19, 2008 2:06 PM

not answered

Result Analysis for TECO status - all values are 0

Dear guru,
I've done the configuration for Result Analysis with POC method 03, for project.
There are 4 relevant status: PREL, REL, FNBL and TECO. TECO is mark as final RA.
PREL, REL, FNBL are ok, but I face problem with TECO.
In project I plan cost, plan revenue, and post actual cost through production order. There is no actual revenue.
However, when I set the status to TECO and run Result Analysis, all the value: plan cost, plan revenue, actual cost,... are 0.
I confuse why it is happen. Please help me.

And another point, actual cost can be see in report, but in RA the actual cost is 0, for also other status.
When I post actual cost through F-02, it is ok. But in this case actual cost is posted to project through confirming production order and receipt material.

Display document of the results analysis for Project

Hello expert,
I'd like to know if a transaction exists to display the document for which I can find the number in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and which is linked to the displayed line items.
Any idea?
Regards,
Céline O.

Hello,
I'm looking for a transaction to display the document which is created for the calculation of the results analysis.
We can find the number of the document when we run the KKA2 transaction : Menu/ Resutl Analysis/ Display Line Items of result Analysis.
That document number is also shown in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and I'd like to find a way to display it easily ((like FB03 for the accounting document, for example) by using the document number only.
Céline O.

Reg the effect of result analysis kka2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for