Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

Hi Experts
My client has two company codes.
CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi,
I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration. There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
Thanks
Naveen

Similar Messages

Results Analysis for Valuated Project stock

Hi,
To have transfer prices we have activated material ledger and multiple valuations.
As material ledger only works with valuated stock, we have moved the Project structure (ETO) from non valuated to valuated.
Our client requirement was to recognised revenue based on cost. With non valuated project stock, cost is upated as soon as we received the stock for the project and we were able to acheive the RA (revenue recognisition) as per the clients requirement.
However after changing to valuated, during goods receipt stock is upated and not cost. So we asked the client to consume the purchased material if they have to recognise the revenue.
Then the question came that if the SFG is received back from the assembly/production order, all of a sudden we will not have cost but revenue & stock. After looking some SAP notes on statistical cost elements, we have created the stock account as a statistical cost element (category 90) and implimented the following SAP notes which helped us to reverse the stock value and update it to P&L (by reading the balance in statistical cost element linked to the Project).
a) Note 78420 : To activate Function Module EXIT_SAPLKKAG_005 (contains include ZXKAGU05).This Function module takes into account the actual & plan costs of the assigned Production orders & Networks
b)Note 616869 : Provides source code to be copied to include ZXKAGU05
c)Note 616960 : Changes to include ZXKAGU05 to read statistical cost elements in RA
d)Note 26002 : To activate Function Module EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001 (contains include ZXKAGU01).In this include we can make the necessary modifications to RA calculations. Through this include, stock will be reversed during RA.
e)Note 785626 : Provides source code to be copied to include ZXKAGU01
Hower if we have purchased parts which are not consumed, still the RA (FM EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001) reads the value in statistical cost element and posts a debit to RA P&L and reverses the stock. Therefore now i have cost but no revenue (as no consumption).
As per last paragraph of sap note 785626, if we have purchased parts and we want to exclude them from stock reversal, we have to use a filter with customer enhancement 3 (SAP note 67423). It also says that the goods receipts and issues of purchased parts has to lead to a different valuation class and assigne a different stock accout. Now can any one give some guidance on how a project specific purchased parts (receipts and issues to prod order) can be linked to a seperated valuation class.
We have same material which is sometimes purchased and sometime produced.
Regards
Raghu.

Hi
I can say something from theory but not much from sap config. perspective. You have not mentioned actual revenue since POC is calculated from
R(a)/R(p).How you have considered 100% poc?
From your data,it looks to me that you have met the target revenue from actual cost which is less than planned one.Inventory indicates that you can generate revenue in next accounting period (unlike WIP).I feel that unlike plant stock,RA is not perfomed on project stock Murli, can ammend my view if it is wrong.
You can post this problem to Fi/Co.
Regards
Adwait

Results Analysis for Projects

Hi Guys,
We use Results analysis for projects and also we use RA in Product Costing.
Can anyone let me know what exactly does this Results Analysis mean ( not in SAP terms ).
I am trying to look for this over help.sap.com and google but could not find information on what exactly this term means.
Also how is this related to WIP?
Please clarify.
Thanks,
Srikanth.

Dear srikusap,
Calculation WIP through the SAP, RA key will play important role. Work in process calculation is diferent from industry to industry.
In SAP RA key will shows the WIP amount while u running KKAX Transaciton Code. After when ever u do the settlement then ti will be settled to Financial Account. At that time A Accounting Document was generaged. when ever the Order Status is Teco then the provious period WIP will be reversed.
Revert back if u any calrification.
Raj

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Posting Rules in Results Analysis for COSR must go to different GL

WE have "Non Valuated KMAT Sales Order Stock" scenario.
It posts COS at time of settlement of Sales Order. Everything works fine. We have a new scenario.
Currently both interco and external customer sales order posts to same COS GL at time of settlement.
Interco KMAT sales orders during settlement must post to Interco COS GL.
In OKG8 - RA Category "COSR" Key is used to post the the GL account.
I have CoArea/CoCd/RAVersion/RACategory for COSR.
Is it possible for system to differentiate and post to different GL, when settling IntercoSales Order vs Regular sales order

Hi Kala,
We had similar scenario and this what we have implemented.
created two Result Analysis keys.one for Regular one and one for Interco
created two usages one for interco business and one for regular one and which is populated each sales order line item.
based on usage,RA key populated.
If usage External : RA key "A" or If Interco "RA key "B".
1.Assign cost elements to respective line ids in OKG5 by RA key
2.Assign line id to RA cost element(31) in OKG4 by RA key(create seperate 31 cost elements for both RA keys)
3.Assign RA cost element(31) to Balance sheet and P&L accounts in OKG8 based.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Rau

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Results Analysis for Contracts

Dear Experts,
My Client requires to do Results Analysis for Contracts. Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Shareeq

Dear Ahemad,
In what would be the output of the result analysis ?I mean from sales point of view if u see then u will have to develop the report accordingly.
If you are talking abt the MM contract then there are some std reports available.
If ur talking abt the customer service point of view then we this std transaction IP51.
thanks and regards
raghav

How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

HI,
I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
Thanks
KB

Hi,
Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
"KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
Thanks,
Rau

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Settlement for month-end closing, individual production or sales order

Dear SAP Experts,
Our style is MTO.
In month-end closing, we follow to make a settlement for production orders:
1. CO43   -- Actual overhead calculation (collective processing)
2. KSU5   -- Actual allocations Assessment
3. KSII     -- Actual Price Calculation
4. CON2 -- Revaluation at actual prices (collective processing)
5. KKAO -- WIP calculation (collective processing)
6. CO88 -- Production order settlement (collective processing)
Question:
1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
    1. KKAX (Work in Process)
    2. KO88 (Settlement)
    Is those enough?
3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
Any tips will be welcome.
Zhou Zhen

Hi,
The value flow completely different for each of the MTO Scenario.
I need to know what kind of MTO scenario you have.
is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order without Sale Order Controlling
Is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling
is it MTO- Non-valuated Sale Order (Sale Order controlling is mandatory)
based on this the value flows and the transaction that need to be executed will differ.
The way you explained i presume that it could be any of the first two scenarios.
in such case, the value flows are as good as make to stock scenario. Only in the third scenario, the value flow completely changes
For 1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
all the accounts relevant for Make to Stock will get affected. But the the scenario is MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling, the the variances from production order is settled to Sale order instead of settling to COPA.
For 2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
All the steps from 1 to 6 are necessary for any of the above 3 scenarios
For 3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
This is for calculating the overheads on the sale order. in this case, the sale order is a controlling object. once this t.code is executed, you can see the oh being calculated on the sale order
Hope this will give some good isight in to various MTO scenarios
Best Regards
Surya

Settlement of Sale Order issue.

Dear friends
I am getting the following error while settling the Sale Order in VA88.
Please guide me in this issue, how to handle?
There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Message no. KD256
Diagnosis
The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
Note
Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
This applies to
Projects that cannot carry revenues
In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
Production orders
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
Production orders without settlement to material
Procedure
1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
2. Restart settlement

Now I am getting another error.
Complete PA transfer structure ZR
Message no. KD514
Diagnosis
There is no value field assignment for cost element 911400 / *_variance category COSR_* in PA transfer structure ZR, or
PA transfer structure ZR has no assignments, or
No "Origin" is maintained for the assignments in PA transfer structure ZR (cost element group and, if applicable, variance category)
When I see the Variance Category I didnt find any Variance Category COSR?
What could be the reason.
Thanks in advance
Kiran

MTO - Settlement of Sales Order to COPA

Hi,
We have a scenario wherein production order is created with reference to Sales order.
No standard / Sale order BOM is maintained. As such no cost estimate is available for either Header material or sales order. Header material does not have any value.
Goods are issued to production order with reference to such sales order, as special stock. So consumption posted to Sales order.
Revenue is captured on Sales order.
At this point of time, can I settle the sales order through VA88. What all will it settle.
Is RA excution a must for VA88 settlement?
Please suggest.

HI,
if you need to have WIP-value posting, result analysis is a must before settlement.
Best regards, Christian

Settlement to Sales Order

Dear All,
I am trying to do the Settlement to Sales Order.
In the Project I maintain the Settlement Rule for the Each and Every WBS as uppar WBS, and the Final Upper WBS/ 1st Level WBS i maintained to Settlement Rule to Sales Order Lilne Item. ( Before i created Sales Order and I assinged 1st Level WBS to that Sales Order)
When i am doing Settlement Rule for the 1st level WBS, system shows, the following mesage
The sales document is assigned to WBS element XXXXX
Message no. V1139
Diagnosis
The sales order item contains a project account assignment.
Procedure
Enter the number of a work breakdown structure element which is included in the same project definition as the work breakdown structure element from the sales order item or assign a sales order item without project assignment.
Regards

As your scenario is of Assembly processing. You have to consider how the requirement type & Requirment class get determined for the Material entered in your Sales Order. You might be aware but check below link how the requirement type & Class get determined in case of Assembly processing.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ab/5d487a733311d2b6600000e82d8bd1/content.htm
Either you might be using SD Item Category or Material Master Main Stretgy will be prevailing for determining requirement type. From that you find the Requirement class And in requirement class there will Acct. Assign Category ..
Also check you customization in below nod.
IMG>PS>Material>Control of Sales-Order-Related Production>Selection of Requirements Type Through MRP Group
IMG>PS>Material>Control of Sales-Order-Related Production>Selection of Requirements Type Through SD Item Category
With Regards
Nitin P.

Settlement of Sale Order to Sale Order

Dear experts
I need help in the following scenario:
At my client place we are doing job work for external material. All the material are supplied by the customer and our client will do the processing and send it back to customer's customer on customers request.
To create Excise Invoice against the Customers Customer we are handling through 2 sale orders.
First One Sale order will be created against the Customer Order and Sale price will be the selling price of Customers to Customer.
Second Sale Order will be created for Job Work Charges for the processing the materials.
On settling the process orders all the cost is settling to Sale Order One, Clients revenue is coming from Sale Order Two.
Here I need to settle the First Sale Order to Second Sale Order. I have given the second sale Order number in first sale order number in Settlement rule.
But when I settle the First sale Order all the amount it going to Price Differance Account.
How to settle the Cost of First Sale Order to Second Sale Order?
Regards
Kiran A

Dear Experts
any advises.
Can I go for Sale Order to Sale Order Settlement ?
Regards
Kiran

Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for