Regarding security update for Flash Player 9 (Flash Player 9,0,124,0)

We are facing issue in STOMP client because of newly
implemented restriction on flash player.(
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/flash_player9_security_update.html).
Because of this, Our STOMP client is not able to get messages
from activemq.
We have tried to add socket meta files as discussed in others
article but we were not able to get solutions.
We have done below stuffs.
1) Added LoadPolicy code in stompclient for getting
policyfile from server running on 80 port.
2) Also set xmlSocket as load policy to get connection from
stompclient to Activemq.
1) PolicyFile.xml(loading this also in STOMPClient.swf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM
"/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
<!-- Policy file for xmlsocket://socks.example.com -->
<cross-domain-policy>
<!-- This is a master-policy file -->
<site-control
permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
<!-- Instead of setting to-ports="*",
administrators can use ranges and commas -->
<!-- This will allow access to ports 123, 456, 457, and
458 -->
<allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="*" />
</cross-domain-policy>
2) Flash players logs(using debug version of Flash player)
Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613
by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
to authorize data loading from resource at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Policy file accepted:
http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 (at 3
seconds) while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
cause any problems, but see
http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
for an explanation.
Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613
by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://mail.google.com/a/sigmainfo.net/im/sound.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://mail.google.com/a/sigmainfo.net/im/sound.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
to authorize data loading from resource at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Policy file accepted:
http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
to authorize data loading from resource at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Policy file accepted:
http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/bill.swf
OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
to authorize data loading from resource at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.12:61613 by requestor from
http://127.0.0.1/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Policy file accepted:
http://192.168.1.12/crossdomain.xml
Warning: Ignoring <site-control> tag in policy file
from
http://192.168.1.12:843/policyfile.xml.
This tag is only allowed in master policy files.
Warning: Domain 192.168.1.12 does not specify a meta-policy.
Applying default meta-policy 'all'. This configuration is
deprecated. See
http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
to fix this problem.
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/ladyguinn.swf
OK: Searching for <allow-access-from> in policy files
to authorize data loading from resource at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613 by requestor from
http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
Warning: [strict] Ignoring policy file at
xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:843 due to incorrect syntax. See
http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
to fix this problem.
Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613 (at 3
seconds) while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
cause any problems, but see
http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
for an explanation.
Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.1.47:61613
by requestor from
http://192.168.1.12/blackwells/bid/stompclient.swf
is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
3) Setting below load policy files in stompclient.mxml
flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("
http://" + server + "/crossdomain.xml");
//flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("
http://" + server + "/policyfile.xml");
flash.system.Security.loadPolicyFile("xmlsocket://" + server
+ ":"+port);
4) we have also changed crossdomain.xml (this is using Schema
instead of DTD as <site-control > is not there in DTD)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<cross-domain-policy xmlns:xsi="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="
http://www.adobe.com/xml/schemas/PolicyFile.xsd">
<allow-access-from domain="*" />
<site-control
permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
</cross-domain-policy>

You're welcome!
Flash is still the same CPU hog... Good that there's [ClickToFlash|http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash>!

Similar Messages

  • Security updates for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux?

    When attempting to download an update for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux, I saw the note saying that there would be no new development, but security backfixes would continue to be released. I've seen the security warnings for months on my Linux install in Firefox (which is updated) but there does not seem to be a security patch that would stop these "Allow - Continue Blocking" warnings for Flash Player.
    When can we expect these to be completed? Linux users may not comprise a large portion of your user base, but the alternatives are extremely expensive hardware and/or software if you want to use an Apple or Microsoft product.

    I chose "Yum for Linux" and the file that was downloaded was:
    adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
    I see now that if I select the "rpm for Other Linux" it downloads the flash-player rpm complete with the version info, so perhaps the Yum version is a wrapper. I assumed that since Fedora (and Redhat/etc) uses yum, that I should download the YUM version... in order for it to take effect, I had to perform the following commands after downloading the above rpm:
    sudo yum remove adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch
    sudo yum localinstall adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
    sudo rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux
    sudo yum -y install flash-plugin
    That allowed me to get the newer version of Flash player to show (and no longer receive the security warnings) but it seems if I had used the Other for Linux download that I wouldn't have had to take those extra steps. I guess we'll find out when the next security update to flash player is released.
    Thanks,
    -Tim

  • Are there critical or security updates for Macromedia Dreamweaver since Adobe took over?

    Are there critical or security updates for Macromedia Dreamweaver Flash and Macromedia suite since Adobe took over? I can still use it but I am worried about security issues.

    corpow wrote:
    I have a new computer with Windows 7 and I thought of installing my old Macromedia Dreamweaver and using it to update my web site. However I don't know if I can still use it with Windows 7 and with no critical updates I am wondering what would happen.
    Or if I reformat my old Windows XP computer  and reinstall Macromedia Dreamweaver, would it be okay, or safe, security wise? Thanks.
    What sort of security are you worried about?  DW creates plain text files and they are as safe as any other text files you create with Notepad or Wordpad.
    How old is your DW?  I personally thing#k that it is time for you to get a new version so that you can create websites based on modern standards that are compatible with modern browsers.
    Amazon should be able to sell you the product at a very competitive price.
    Good luck.

  • Security update for flash player....did it install?

    Yesterday on dec 16, I had a window pop up on my comp telling me that there is some security update for flash player so I clicked install and it was connecting and everything...then I allowed Adobe systems incorportated permission and all that stuff which was normal....then the adobe helper stopped working and I got a message saying that it will have to close the program......now I don't know...did the updates install or not...what were the security updates so I can check...any advice?

    Hi, well DLM is Download Manager and sometimes it is used to D/L FP. It is supposed to disconnect after FP is downloaded. Go to Add/Remove, you should see Flash Player 10 ActiveX listed. If the Adobe Download Manager or DLM is listed Remove it from there and reboot. It is not supposed to be there after it serves it purpose.
    The version is 10.0.42.34, I hope you just made a typo:-)
    Also, if you are using IE, go to Tools>Manage add ons and look to see if you have listed Shockwave Flash Object......
    ActiveX......Flash10d.ocx and that it is Enabled.  Be sure to check in "currently loaded" and "have been used".
    In Firefox you would look in extenstions, add ons or plug-ins, look for SWF.
    In order for FP to operate properly, you need the ActiveX in IE and the SWF plug-in in FF.
    Thanks 

  • Security Update for Flash Video

    The Security Update for Dreamweaver CS3 from downloads
    APSB08-01.zip does not have the correct date. The Security Bulletin
    says to verify the creation date of the file Adobe Dreamweaver
    CS3\configuration\Templates\Video_Player. The date should be
    January 15, 2008 according to the Bulletin.
    I have gone through the procedure three times and still end
    up with the wrong date. Is the bulletin wrong? Would a January 9,
    2008 date be correct? If not, I desperately need help to resolve
    this problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Pat

    I've noticed this too. Just had to do a fresh install of
    Vista, after installing DW CS3 I downloaded the Flash player
    security update by following
    http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-01.html?trackingid=BUCMS&pss=dw_9.0 _win_en_full___20040226
    to
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb402925&sliceId=2
    When extracted, the files contained within APSB08-01.zip have
    a date of January 1, 2008; however the text indicates the date of
    extracted files should be January 15, 2008.
    Would it not make more sense for this update to simply be
    included as other updates within the Adobe Updater?
    As the poster above me, Secunia is also reporting these files
    as insecure even after downloaded from the above links and
    applied.

  • I need the download for the Security Update for Shockwave Player Active X 12.0.3.133

    To Whom It May Concern,
    I need the download for Adobe Shockwave Player Security Update for Shockwave Player Active X 12.0.3.133.  So far all I have got is the run around.  Please can someone help me get this update for my laptop?
    Sincerely,
    Lisa Newman

    Is there a reason you need this SPECIFIC build? Because I was unable to locate it in three different places I looked.
    There are FULL installers here: http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/alternates/#sp (version 11)
    12.0.4.144 is here: http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/otherversions/

  • I'm getting error messages when I download updates for lightroom and flash for the mac. can't figure out how to trouble shoot.

    I'm getting error messages when I download updates for lightroom and flash for the mac. can't figure out how to trouble shoot.

    It sounds as if your browser and some of your apps are not color-managed.  This is pretty typical.  Even IE9 is only partially color-managed.
    You can expect color-managed and non-color-managed applications to show you different things with the same images.  How different will depend upon how different your monitor color profile is from the image's color profile.
    For web publication and most general use, experts usually advise saving images with the sRGB profile.  If such images, saved through the Save for Web & Devices function, look different to you than you expect, it may be that your input images have previously been saved in another color space.
    You should really try to get your head around color-management by reading more on it.  It can seem baffling and it's difficult to understand without some background.  A quick web search turns up many overviews.  Beware, though, even people writing articles sometimes don't fully understand it.
    -Noel

  • Cumulative Security Update for Windows XP Service Pack 2 Warning!

    Not sure how many of you guys remember the problems associated with the Windows XP Service Pack 2 when it was first released, but the latest Cumulative Security patch completely disabled my Plextor 708A DVD drive and locked up Windows Explorer. 
    Here is the problem patch:
     o Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer for Windows XP Service Pack 2 (KB883939)
    It caused my Plextor 708A to give off two blinking Amber lights, which according to Plextor indicates the drive is defective.  Plextor actually tells you to get a RMA ticket and to return the drive.  Luckily I found it odd that my DVD drive became defective after I installed the latest windows update and tried uninstalling the 'fixes' before going that route.  Fortunately, removal of one of the 'fixes' solved my problem.
    If you find that your DVD or CD Player no longer works after doing a windows update, then do the following:
     o Go to Control Panel
     o Select Add Remove Programs
     o Scroll to the bottom and select Security Update for Windows XP (KB883939)
     o Click 'Remove'
     o Restart your computer
    I might not have the latest security fix right now, but at least my computer is running. 
    Stu:  Can you report this to MSI and have them get in touch with M$?

    i will, if this is a problem affecting a lot of users.
    has anyone else experienced this problem?

  • How do I keep my macbook secure since Apple is not longer providing security updates for Mac OS X 10.5?

    I just found out that Apple is no longer providing security updates on Mac OS X 10.5. What can I do to keep my comupter safe? I bought my laptop in Sept. '08 and I am not inclined to fork over a couple of thousand dollars when I have a perfectly functioning laptop. Any advise out there? Thnx

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    Here's a 100% effective (though not necessarily practical) solution:
    Never connect your computer to the internet, never insert a disc or flash drive from anyone else, never purchase any new software, and use the computer to write and print only actual letters, never connect to email.
    Your computer will continue to function as it does now until it wears out, without being vulnerable to any new security threats out there, and will continue to work just fine on OS X 10.5 without any future security measures.
    On a side note, I have a 16-year-old car I spent thousands of dollars to purchase new, but I've been driving it on the metal rims for a while now, because I'm not inclined to fork over money for tires, when I have an otherwise perfectly functioning car.
    Then there are alternatives that cost money:
    Purchase and install an antivirus program and keep it updated.
    Upgrade your computer memory and hard disk if necessary so you can install OS X 10.6 'Snow Leopard', or OS X 10.7 'Lion'  Snow Leopard is still supported by Apple for the moment, but support and security updates for 10.6 will likely be discontinued soon after OS X 10.8 'Mountain Lion' ships later this year.
    Even though we want computers to be assets that retain or increase in value over time, the economic reality is that computers are best thought of as commodities and/or consumables that depreciate, become obsolete, and wear out, like cars, tires, and batteries. A restored 1965 Mustang Convertible, and a 2012 Mustang Convertible probably cost about the same. Which one is much safer, much faster, rides much better, and gets much better fuel mileage?
    Your computer WILL be worth less five years after you purchase it than the day you bought it. The mechanical parts (hard disk) will eventually wear out. The microprocessor inside yours operates at perhaps 1/4th the maximum speed of the slowest current model. The latest video chipsets provide huge performance gains over 2008 technology. But if your current computer truly meets all your needs, then indeed there is no reason to update or upgrade.
    If you're using your computer in business, a 2008 model is fully depreciated in 5 years (this year) and it's time to consider a new purchase.  In the US, IRS Publication 946 will get you started: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p946.pdf

  • Security Update for exchange server 2013SP1 KB3011140 Stops all services and failes to install

    Hi All,
    Over the past 2 days this update has tried to run on the server in the evening but ends up failing. When it fails it is causing all of our exchange services to stop working and when we try to check e-mails the following day we find out the e-mail service
    has been offline since the update.
    Is there anything specific we need to do before running this update?
    Cheers,

    Hi,
    As what Hotaka says, this update is available from
    Windows Update. If it fails, we can also download and install the updates manually. The following stand-alone file is available for download from the Microsoft Download Center:
    Download the security update for Exchange 2013 Service Pack 1 package now.
    Download the security update for Exchange 2013 Cumulative Update 6 package now.
    Regards,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • KB2977326 - Security Update for SQL Server Service Pack 1 repeatedly fails to install

    This update fails to install every day when I shut down my computer. Here is the WindowsUpdate.Log:
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:469
    420 44c
    AU #########
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:469
    420 44c
    AU  # Initiating install at shutdown
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:469
    420 44c
    AU  # Approved updates = 1
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 44c
    AU <<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Install updates / installing updates [CallId = {685C12BB-7AA9-4A31-9620-8F306EEE31C3}]
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 44c
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown starts.
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 1528
    Agent *************
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 1528
    Agent ** START **  Agent: Installing updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 1528
    Agent *********
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:516
    420 1528
    Agent  * Updates to install = 1
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:531
    420 1528
    Agent  *   Title = Security Update for SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 1 (KB2977326)
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:531
    420 1528
    Agent  *   UpdateId = {E0D65CC4-3B13-4352-BD89-A28C5F4C5017}.200
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:531
    420 1528
    Agent  *     Bundles 1 updates:
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:531
    420 1528
    Agent  *       {C076E757-1A4F-44DB-823B-CFFC07CD7D38}.200
    2014-12-02 15:50:11:547
    420 16d8
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown got install progress.
    2014-12-02 15:50:12:327
    420 d4c
    Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
    2014-12-02 15:50:20:548
    420 44c
    AU WARNING: Pending directive, 'Install Approval', is not applicable
    2014-12-02 15:50:24:417
    420 16d8
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown got install progress.
    2014-12-02 15:50:24:432
    420 16d8
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown got install progress.
    2014-12-02 15:50:24:432
    420 1528
    DnldMgr Preparing update for install, updateId = {C076E757-1A4F-44DB-823B-CFFC07CD7D38}.200.
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Misc ===========  Logging initialized (build: 7.6.7600.320, tz: -0600)  ===========
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Misc  = Process: C:\Windows\system32\wuauclt.exe
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Misc  = Module: C:\Windows\system32\wuaueng.dll
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Handler :::::::::::::
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Handler :: START ::  Handler: Command Line Install
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Handler :::::::::
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    2052 608
    Handler  : Updates to install = 1
    2014-12-02 15:50:25:119
    420 16d8
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown got install progress.
    2014-12-02 15:52:23:991
    420 44c
    AU AU setting next sqm report timeout to 2014-12-03 21:52:23
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    2052 608
    Handler  : WARNING: Command line install completed. Return code = 0x84b20001, Result = Failed, Reboot required = false
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    2052 608
    Handler  : WARNING: Exit code = 0x8024200B
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    420 16d8
    AU >>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Installing update [UpdateId = {E0D65CC4-3B13-4352-BD89-A28C5F4C5017}]
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    2052 608
    Handler :::::::::
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    2052 608
    Handler ::  END  ::  Handler: Command Line Install
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    2052 608
    Handler :::::::::::::
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    420 16d8
    AU  # WARNING: Install failed, error = 0x80070643 / 0x84B20001
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587
    420 16d8
    Shutdwn InstallAtShutdown got install progress.
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:711
    420 1528
    Report REPORT EVENT: {DFA9CDC8-334A-4E57-9588-77B8E980833D}
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:587-0600 1
    198 101
    {E0D65CC4-3B13-4352-BD89-A28C5F4C5017}
    200 80070643
    AutomaticUpdates Failure
    Content Install Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x80070643: Security Update for SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 1 (KB2977326).
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:727
    420 1528
    Report CWERReporter::HandleEvents - WER report upload completed with status 0x8
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:727
    420 1528
    Report WER Report sent: 7.6.7600.320 0x80070643 E0D65CC4-3B13-4352-BD89-A28C5F4C5017 Install 101 Unmanaged
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:727
    420 1528
    Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 1528
    Agent *********
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 16d8
    AU Install call completed.
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 1528
    Agent **  END  **  Agent: Installing updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 16d8
    AU  # WARNING: Install call completed, reboot required = No, error = 0x00000000
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 1528
    Agent *************
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 16d8
    AU #########
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 16d8
    AU ##  END  ##  AU: Installing updates [CallId = {685C12BB-7AA9-4A31-9620-8F306EEE31C3}]
    2014-12-02 15:54:39:805
    420 16d8
    AU #############
    jim...

    Hello,
    Please examine the Summary.txt log file. The following article may help you locate the file on disk:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143702(v=sql.110).aspx
    If you find the sentence “A failure was detected for a previous installation” on the Summary.txt log file, please repair SQL Server using the following article:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Cc646006(v=sql.110).aspx
    If you find other errors, please share the content of the Summary.txt log file with us.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • How to uninstall/remove security update for SQL Server 2012

    My requirement is to uninstall/remove security update for SQL
    Server 2012 Service Pack 1 only. so are these below steps are correct or do I need to take any extra precaution for uninstallation?
    Go to Control panelàProgramsà
    Programs and FeaturesàInstalled Updrtes, right click on update and uninstall
    As per my knowledge in SQL Server 2005, we cannot uninstall a service pack. we have to uninstall SQL Server 2005 completely, and reinstall SQL Server 2005 with previous service
    packs and updates. but Starting SQL Server 2008, we can uninstall a service pack using Control Panel.
    Rahul

    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/askjay/archive/2011/02/07/uninstalling-a-sql-server-service-pack.aspx
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • 306MB security update for Skype for Business

    Hi Microsoft or Community,
    I went through a list of updates being shown by WIndows update (I'm on 8.1) and was stunned to see this
    Security update for Skype for Business(KB3039779) 64Bit: 306MB
    Security update for Skype for Business(KB3054946) 64Bit: 100.1MB
    What's going on? What happened to the small and light messaging clients? I mean the above update is about 400MB that too, just security. Are you intending to update just skype or is this going to write all over the Windows 8 binaries.  I believe the messaging client has to be/can be less that 50MB in total. Use the media, networking and security layers of the host OS, don't rewrite these in the messaging client. In fact the design philosphy from mobiles should carry over.
    The biggest advantage MS has here is that you write the OS too where the security and multi-media capabilities should logically be added. If the 400MB above is updating those capabilities then call it a windows update.
    For now I will uncheck the update box, so I don't install the above two patches. Please escalate this to MS product management and add to your product roadmap to design and release a compact skype.
    Thanks and regards,
    A Samel
    [Topic title updated by moderator to be more descriptive. Original topic title was: "306MB security update for Skype"]

    Skype for Business and Skype for Windows desktop are two totally different products. You may look for help on your issues with Skype for Business on Microsoft Office Support. https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA34552/i-m-having-issues-with-skype-for-business-where-can-i-get-help 

  • MS14-055 security update for Microsoft Lync Server 2010

    hello
    after applying this security update do I need to Apply it to the back end database? or is that just when regular patches are applied?

    Hi totalnet32,
    From http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2493736, we know that
    "After you install the update for the Core Components server role on a Lync Server 2010 Enterprise Edition front end server, the updated SQL database files are dropped to the computer that has the Core Components server role installed.This
    also applies to a Lync Server 2010 Standard Edition server. To apply the database changes, run the following cmdlets:
    Install-CsDatabase -Update -ConfiguredDatabases -SqlServerFqdn <EEBE.Fqdn> -UseDefaultSqlPaths
    2982388
    (https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2982388/            )    
    MS14-055: Description of the security update for Microsoft Lync Server 2010 (Response Group Service): September 9, 2014
    2982385
    (https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2982385/            )    
    MS14-055: Description of the security update for Microsoft Lync Server 2010 (Security update for Standard/Enterprise edition Server): September 23, 2014
    There's no Core Components server role update, as far as my experience, the DB update is not required.
    And I suggest that reboot the Lync Servers once after the updates have been installed.
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Security Update for SQL Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 2 (KB2977320)

    So i have been trying to install this update on one of our servers since it is showing up on our MBSA scans but it has been failing on one of our machines with the error code: 0x80070643
    I downloaded the update and tired to install it manually. The installer returned: There are no SQL Server instances or shared features that can be updated on this computer. If that was true then why is SCCM still pushing the update to the machine and why
    is the MBSA showing that it needs the update? Any advice would be helpful. Thanks!

    Hi David,
    Based on my understanding, the error code: 0x80070643 was thrown out when you install KB2977320 with MBSA. And installation also failed when you download and install update manually.
    Regarding the error code: 0x80070643, it can be caused if the MSI software update registration has become corrupted, or if the .NET Framework installation on the computer has become corrupted. To fix this issue, we can follow these methods:
    Fix MSI software update registration corruption issues
    Repair the .Net Framework
    Uninstall and reinstall the .Net Framework
    For more information, please refer to this link:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976982.
    Besides, the security update is released for SQL Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 2, please check the version of SQL Server you are using. About how to check the SQL Server version, please refer to this article: How to tell what SQL Server version you are running
    (http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1140/how-to-tell-what-sql-server-version-you-are-running/). Then please download the Security Update for SQL
    Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 2 from this link (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=43957), and retry install it manually.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu

Maybe you are looking for

  • Auto creation of notification for vendor problems

    Hi, pls advise how to generate notificatin for vendor problems during goods receipt. can it be possible to generate automatically when there is problem for the vendor for the goods which are subjected to GR. Pls advise.

  • How to run stored procedure in run-time not in design

    hello: I have download the ODT software and i installed VS 2003 environment amd i have oracle 9i on the server and oralce client on my computer and I know how to run the ODT inside the VS2003 and how to use it I built a package and inside it a proced

  • Can't export to DivX AVI

    I am using a product called EyeTV to encode television programs onto my MAC. Afterwards I am given the option of compression. One of those options is DivX AVI. When I choose this I get the following error: "The currently installed DivX AVI component

  • Split a String in Crystal Reports

    Hi All, I need help in creating a formula to extract the date for database field and refer to screenshot below For Example :10/28/2013 Thanks for your help in advance

  • FM for presentation server

    Hi Experts, I need a FM which return all the file names in a specified directory of presentation server. I also need FM which will provide F4 help on presentation server to search  directories. Regards, Jeetu