Reimbursement Amount Calculation
Hi,
We have below configuration set up in Travel Management.
In SPRO -- Define Flat Rates for Travel Costs.
For Certain combination of vehicle class, vehicle type, the reimbursement amount is 0.40.
The miles/km limit is 10,000
Period Start Date/End Date : 01.07.2009/31.12.9999
For the same above combination, we have reimbursement amount 0.25
Miles/Kms limit is 99999
Period Start Date/End Date : 01.07.2009/31.12.9999
Now the issue is, for some employees, if i raise travel claim for 10,000 miles, the reimbursement amount is coming as 4000(10,000*0.40), but for employees reimbursement amount is not updating as 4000. The reimbursement amount is coming as 3998 instead of 4000.
Up to 9980 miles, the calculation is taking as 9980* 0.40 = 3992
calculation for the rest 20 miles is taking as 20* 0.25 = 5
So the total reimbursement amount is calculating as 3992 + 5 = 3997.
Can any one tell me why this is happening..??
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Praisty
Hi Praisty,
Actually the settings work with the type of cummulation we have defined. Please check the below IMG path and table PTRV_KMSUM .
Travel Expenses-> Trip Reimbursement Amounts -> Miles/Km Cumulation
Please check the below link which will surely solve your issue.
Re: mileage cumulation error
Re: Miles/Kms cumulation: exceeding of cumulation limit
If the problem still persists do let us know.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
Similar Messages
-
IExpense Reimbursable Amount Calculation
Hi All,
I have a requirement in iExpense. below the navigation path
*" iExpense,Standard-->Expenses Home-->Create Expence Report-->Cash and Other Expenses(Step 4 of 5)--->Mileage Expenses "*
From here when i press calculate then as per seeded it is calculating the Reimbursement Amount by multiplying Daily Distance * Distance Rate and sum all the Reimbursable Amount
_(but i have moved the server files to my JDEV Environment i couldn't find the Calculate Button Functionality if any one knows please let me know)_.
But in my requirement when i click the Calculate button it has to calculate the Reimbursement Amount as per my Custom Package, Package should takes the following Parameters
In Parameters
1.No of Days
2.Sum of Daily Distance(This Column is rendered in our seeded page)
3.Grade of the Employee(Which is assigned for the login User)
Out Parameter
4.reimbursable Amount
inside the package i will perform some calculations to get the reimbursable Amount now i have to get this Reimbursable Amount when i press calculate button
Could any one help me to resolve this As soon as Possible..
Regards,
SaroSaro,
Can you click on the page's about this page link (you will get when you enable FND: Diagnostics) and give me the PG version.
Between, extend the toplevel controller and in your extended ProcessFormRequest
Print the value for
pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM);
And
import java.util.Enumeration;
Enumeration enums = pageContext.getParameterNames();
while(enums.hasMoreElements())
String paramName = enums.nextElement().toString();
System.out.println("Param names " paramName " -----> Param Values " + pageContext.getParameter(paramName));
And find any relevant parameters being passed.
Thanks.
With Regards,
Kali.
OSSI. -
PO with Total Price amount calculated is incorrect at the time of printing.
Hi Experts,
I have one PO with Total Price amount calculated is incorrect at the time of printing.
When my user took the first print out the PO shows the incorrect Total amount.
After 10 mins my user taken the printout again,that time it shows the Toatal Price value is correct amount.
How i can analysis this type of BUG..!!!
I am thinking it might be BUG...???
Please advice with you valuable inputs.
Best Regards,
RKHi,
Are you using the standard programm and print form or are you using your own?. Most of the printing issues happens because of own programms. Try with the standard and then you will be able to see why is this happening.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack -
Hi All,
Facing an issue wherein, when I enter the mileage details for an employee, for TPV: 07-Canada.. The trip reimbursement amount shows as zero.. In stead it shows the amount as an income related expense... I have checked the customising and it seems ok to me.. Anyone has any idea about this.. How do I get the travel flat rate to show as a reimbursement and not an income related expense?
Pls let me know..
Thanks.
Best regards,
Tanmay Dhingra
+91 8806666606Hi,
Found the issue.. The issue was that table V_T706B1_A for entry FAK.. where in the correct tax code first needs to be maintained (it was incorrect in my case).. Then in table: V_706B1, for expense type: FAKC, the expense category should be: 'Exprenses for Private car'.. Once this is done, it will resolve the issue.. -
Reimbursable Amount - Table/ Column
Hi,
I need to include the 'Reimbursable Amount' in an expense report.
Does anyone know the table/column that maps to this field on the self service form.
Thanks.Amount column in ap_expense_report_lines stores the value of the re-imbursable amount, and the receipt_currency_amount column stores the value of the entered amount
-
How is exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?
How is the exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?
For child support CHILD_SUPP_CALCULATION_FORMULA fast formula can be used for getting the exempt amount?
What about other involuntary deductions like alimony, creditor debt, bankruptcy?
Can anyone please guide me to any documents concerning this.
Regards,
Manish.When you define the deduction using the Deduction template, the formula are automatically get defined.
Ex in your case Creditor debt is an involuntary deduction and it should be paid using the third party payment, the priority of this deduction will be 1 and you also might need to define external organization to pay this amount.
You can refer the payroll user guide which might provide you few details of the involuntary deduction -
Depreciation - Planned amount calculation
Dear gurus,
I had a problem on SAP planned amount calculation as follow:
Asset acquisition value: 10.000.000
Use life: 3 years (36 months)
In AW01N, the planned amounts are:
Prd1: 277.778-
Prd2: 277.778-
Prd3: 277.777-
Prd4: 277.778-
I want the planned amount of Period 3 is just the same as the others (277.778-). Would you please help me solve this problem?
Thank you very muchHi
Goi to Tr. Code OAYO
Select check Box - Net Book Value at year end.
Select Arthimatic rounding
Thanks
Anil -
Can anyone tell me the behavior of Fixed Amount Calculation Type for Purchasing?
For example ZNB1 handling-fee value is $80, (scenario1) is $80 the total cost when the target quantity has been completed? (scenario2) Or will 80 be charged per GR?
Scenario1 for fixed amount calculation type:
total target quantity = 100 units
amount = $80
1st GR = 20 units, handling fee = $16
2nd GR = 80 units, handling fee = $64
Scenario2 for fixed amount calculation type:
total target quantity = 100 units
amount = $80
1st GR = 20 units, handling fee = $80
2nd GR = 80 units, handling fee = $80
Thanks everyone!Scenario 1 is correct .
-
Hi Gurus ,
Please have a look at the scenario below and kindly explain how the GR amount is calculated
Suppose PO price = 1 per unit
PO qty = 100
Now the following docs are posted in the sequence mentioned below :
1) Invoice is posted with qty 1 , price 10 (this invoice is wrongly posted)
2) One more invoice with qty 10 and price 10 (now the actual correct invoice is posted )
3) First invoice with qty 1 is reversed ( so that total invoiced qty becomes 10 and total invioce price = 10 )
4) Now a GR is posted with quanity 10 .
What would be the amount of the GR . I have checked and found that its 18.18 (for total 10 quantity ) . How is this amount getting calculated ? I have also found that the GR amount for the 11th qty is 1 which is understandable based on the invoice and the PO price.
Regards,
Sauravthanks Allen for your reply .. these are really helpful..
But the scenario of invoice reversal has not been explained there. In my case , in my 3rd step i am cancelling the invoice posted wrongly (the first invoice) but it seems that while posting GR , system does not consider the reversed invoice value and calculates the GR amount based on the first two invoices ...
that is after the first 2 invoices , my total qty invoiced = 11
total invoice price = 20
Price of one = 20/11 = 1.818
GR amount for 10 = 18.18
why the system is not considering invoice reversal while calculating GR amount ? -
Tax Base amount calculation in MIRO
Hi friends ,
Need your help on the following issue
1. PO item price is Rs 20/- & Tax is 7 % . But Tax 7 % should be calculated on Rs 100/- (20+80 =100) in MIRO . i.e. Assessable value for tax is Rs 100/-
2. We tried this scenario in the following way .
Enter the tax amount as Rs 7/- (7% on Rs 100/) ,
Do not ticket u201CCalculate taxu201D ,
Enter the u201CTotal Amountu201D as Rs 27/- ( Rs 20+7)can put
It is working fine. But when we take report to submit government officials, for this PO line item the assessable value is showing as Rs 20/- (PO value) and the tax 7% on this assessable value shows as Rs 1.4/- though the tax value is Rs 7/- .
Could some one help how to face this issue
Thx
DevaIf your tax procedure is TAXINN,
Define new condition type with Cond Class B & Cal Type C.
Define new condtion table and access sequence for this condition type.
Include this tax condition type in Tax procedure.
It is to be included next to BASB. This condition type to be maintained as statistical in TAXINN.
Maintain condition record on required combination.
In third step of TAXINN, give the summation of BASB & new condition type.
Use this third step as the assessable value for tax calculation.
In your case,
STEP Condition type Value
10 BASB = 20 (From PO Item Price)
20 New condition type = 80 (From condition Record)
30 Assesable Value = 100 (STEP 10 + STEP 20)
40 Tax condition type = 7 (7% FROM STEP 40)
Then go for PO-GR-MIRO as regular procedure.
Hope this works for you. -
EXC BASE AMOUNT CALCULATED ON WHAT BASIS? (J1IEX)
When I display excise document in J1IEX in TAB Duty value Exc. Base field is there.
Can some one tell me on what basis system calculates this base value.
Better if you can give example.
Thanks,
Dhananjaya
Edited by: Dhananjayappa E on Jan 12, 2009 4:39 PMhi
it is the net amount on which the excise to be calculated
this value is get picked up from the value we are giving in the po and on which GR is happening
like
condition value in PO 100 inr
this will be the base value
on this system will calculate excise as 10 inr and respectively 2 and 1 % cess
regards
kunal -
Wrong Base amount calculated for JEC1 & JSEP
Hello All,
I am using TAXINN procedure, while creating a PO, in invoice tab, BED (JMOP) is getting calculated correctly, but for JEC1 ( 2% Edu Cess) & JSEP (1% H&SEcess) , the base value is calculated wrongly, and because if this the duty amount is shown less.
For e.g. Base Value ----- 100000
JMOP (10%) - 10000
JEC1 (2%) - 20
JSEP(1%) - 10
When i check base value for JEC1 and JSEP it it taking as 1000 instead of 10000. I have maintained the condition records in FV11 .
Please help
Regards,
VikasHi Vikas,
Please check in OBQ3 what is the "From" field of JEC1 and JSEP. This should be the step denoting JMOP.
Regards
Binoy -
Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly
Dear Friends,
While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
Thanks,
Hari DharenThank you Mani Kumar,
But that's what we already have in customizing:
The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
51,000*3% = 1,530
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
F110 Proposal generated:
It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
(only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
Thanks -
Dear Experts,
I am using tax code (ZS) with 10%, 2% and 1%.
when i am posting FB60 by using this tax code its calculating tax amounts wrongly.
For example i am posting Rs.20000/-
when system has to calculate..
Vendor Cr 20,000/-
Expense Dr 17,940/-
Sevice tax On OH Dr 2,000/-
ECS on OH Dr 40/-
SEC on OH Dr 20/-
But Systm Calculating like below..
Vendor Cr 20,000.00
Expense Dr 18,132.37
Sevice tax On OH 1,813.24
ECS on OH 36.26
SEC on OH 18.13
Plese help on this issue...Dear Anil
Kindly note that Tax will always be created on Amount Exclusive of Tax. Let me explain with an example.
The form of invoice would be in the following form :
Expense of Service Recd 20000 (Excl of Tax)
Add : Serv Tax @10% 2000
Add : Ecess & SHCess 60
Total Invoice Amt. 22060 (Incl of Tax)
Thus if you enter Against Expense 20000 as net invoice amount in FB60
then following entry will be generated :
Exp ..... Dr. 20000
Serv Tax Dr. 2000
Ecess & SHcess Dr. 60
To Vendor 22060
But if you choose Expense 20000 as gross amount invoice in FB60
Exp ..... Dr. 18,132.37
Serv Tax Dr. 1,813.24
Ecess & SHcess Dr. 54.39
To Vendor 20,000.00
Hope it provide you better picture about Tax Calculation -
Any way to change the ESS Summary Screen and reimbursement amount?
Hi All,
We are on ECC 6.0, EHP4 and using ESS.
Employee's have a company paid corporate card but employees are allowed to enter 'out of pocket' transactions so that they may be reimbursed for cab fares, parking, tips, or other situations that require cash.
We have a problem with these 'out of pocket' entries on the summary screen in ESS (and in PR05 for that matter but we don't use PR05). This might also be known as the 'Review and Send' screen. The Summary section displays Total Paid reciepts, Mileage Reimbursement (if any), Total Travel Expenses, Paid by Company, Amount Reimbursed and Amount Paid Out.
When a user enters one of these 'out of pocket' expenses we exepect them to be reimbursed for this amount. The FI and Payroll postings do reflect this requirement but the summary screen does not show it. I have determined how to update the summary screen in the ABAP code but there is no user-exit or the like to actually make the alterations. Does anyone know what fields control how the system determines what is to be reimbursed? I have tried making updates to the reciept data using interface: IF_EX_TRIP_WEB_CHECK but haven't had any luck. I was hoping changing PTRV_UTIL_BELEG-CFIRMA (paid by company) would make a difference or some other value in PTRV_UTIL_BELEG. If there is some combination I have not been able to figure it out.
Any help or direction is appreciated.
Thanks,
ScottHi Raj,
Thanks for your reply. Let me explain a little more on what we are trying to do. Our requirement is that we have 1 and only 1 expense type for each type of expense. We have not created both a "paid by company" and "reimburse to employee" expense type for each. All of our expense types are set up as "paid by company". There are over 100 so you can imagine how awful this would be for the users if it was doubled.
We are controlling the reimbursement with the service provider field (PAYOT). Thus we have assigned each expense type to 2 wage types. An expense that comes from the credit card feed has a service provider "VI" for our VISA card. An expense that is entered manually has a "blank" service provider field which we then classify as being "out of pocket" and this amount should be reimbursed to the employee.
As I said, this all works fine other than the summary screen. Postings to FI and Payroll work well. I could of course, change the config as you mentioned but then we would have other problems.
Any other ideas? Maybe what we are trying to do just should not be done. Our last resort is to completely hide the summary screen if I can't figure anything out. This is not ideal but would be better than showing incorrect data.
-Scott
Maybe you are looking for
-
External Connection Pool - No Available Connections
I am using Toplink 9.0.4 in an application deployed on WebLogic 7. Toplink is configured to use an external connection pool. Under heavy load we sometimes exhaust the connection pool. When this occurs we start to get failures when trying to acquire c
-
Dear expert, Refer to my question about checking field batch and valuation type in purchasing document, i got problem when implement user exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012, bellow part of coding which implemented in this exit : CASE sy-ucomm. WHEN 'MESAVE'
-
Can't see pages in Iweb when no monitor connected to mac
...Sounds obvious I guess, but basicaly this is my problem. I have a mac mini and I connect to it using logmein via my laptop. It works a treat. However when I open I web i can see all my websites but the pages just display as blank. If i connect a m
-
ipod doesn't work on speakers but headphones are fine and speaker works with iPhone. Possible connector issue? Any thoughts on how I can get the fixed?
-
Whenever I go to buy a new app for my iPhone 4, at installation the store returns a message demanding the password attached to an account that has been obsolete for two years. Thus, the purchase never goes through. I cannot see a way to update to m