Remove Personalization at User Level - Saved Searches

All,
There is a problem in the Saved Searches. We are on 11.5.10. The page immeditely throws error when a custom view is created using "Save Search" button.
It says,
## Detail 0 ##
java.lang.NullPointerException
at oracle.apps.fnd.framework.webui.OADataBoundValueCustomization.getValue (OADataBoundValueCustomization.java:191)
I am not able to revert this view created through save search. I tried by setting the Disable Self-Service Personal to Yes at that user level where i created the view and bounced apache. But the error still exists.
Is there any means like by "Functional Administrator" responsibility where these views can be removed?
Thanks,
Padmaja

Pl see if a similar issue reported in MOS Doc 859190.1 (Personal Worklist Returns NullPointerException When 'Disable Self - Service Personal' Is Set To Yes) can help
HTH
Srini

Similar Messages

How can we do personalization at User Level

Hi ,
I have extended a controller .
and I have to replace the seeded controller to extended controller using personalization at User Level.
Can any one suggest how can we do personalization at user level.
Regards,
Krishna.

Hi,
If you have extended controller then why don't you use profile option for restricting at user level.
In controller use as following :
processRequest(...)
super.processRequest(...);
String userProfile = pageContect.getProfile("Profile option name");
if(null!= userProfile && !"".equalsIgnoreCase(userProfile.trim()) && "userRestriction".equals(userProfile.trim()))
//do your changes
follow same in processFormRequest as well.
Once it is done...replace you controller at site level. It will only work for the users for whom the profile option is set.
Regards,
Mukesh Uchaniya

Can we do personalization at user level under iprocurement

Hi,
Using the personalization i have enabled the exchang rate and exchange date for Non-catalog request items in iProcurement since, we are facing exchang rate issue.
i have enabled the personalization at responsibility level so all users are viewing the personalize fields. Now i want to restrict the personalize fields at the user levle. Is there any way i can do the personalization at the user levles?
Note: we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
Please let me know..
Regards,
Kevin.

Hi,
There's another way apart from personalizations.
Hi Suppose you have two fields say A and B and two users David and Henry.
You want David should see both the fields and Henry shoudn't...
Then in that case in the controller of the page in process request you cvan capture the Username from profile option
String user = (String)pageContext.getUserName();
if("David".equals(user))
field A .setRendered(true);
field B .setRendered(true);
else if("Henry".equals(user))
field A .setRendered(false);
field B .setRendered(false);
You can proceed this way....
Thanks,
Gaurav

Remove personalization for users

Hi,
we are running a portal for many thousand users. We have restricted personalization on the portal so that the user cannot personalize anything.
However after an upgrade, personalization was allowed at some placed for a short while before we removed it. However a couple of users managed to personalize their site, and now we wan't remove their personalization and reset their portal to the default one.
Does anyone know how to do this.
Are there table in the DB where personalization is stored.
We are running EP 60 SP2 Patch 3 hotfix 7 on AIX
Thanks,
Mikkel

In EP5, personalization details was stored in PCD - Database.
If only couple of users, then you can delete these users when they are not using the portal and recreate the user ids with default portal personalization. This is just a work around, i am sure there will be better option in EP6.
If you are fine with the work around, give some points.
Thanks
Senthil

Form Personalization at user level

Hi,
I'm new to form prsonnalization and dont have much knoweldge on this.
Can any one help me in personalization of a form where a single field in a form needs be edited or changed by single user only and for the rest it should be in read only mode.
And i got to do this without using "custom.pll"
Thanks in advance.
B/R,
Venkat.

You also try with following setting with same condition .
Event : WHEN-VALIDATE-RECORD
Object : PO_LINES

Saved Search Mailer - remove "Modified Date" from the results

Does anyone know how to remove Modified Date in the saved search mailer results? Our current results are posted below and we'd like to remove the entire Line of "Modified: xxxxx ".
5/2 - Read the latest Maximizing Your Benefits newsletter (2)In this issue: What to expect for 2005 Open Enrollment for Staples benefits.Modified May 9, 2005 5:00:45 PM EDT4/27 - Are you ready for Mother's Day? Staples RealLifePerks can help. (2)Be sure to visit Staples RealLifePerks for gift ideas and great discounts.Modified May 9, 2005 5:00:45 PM EDT4/14 - Read the latest Maximizing Your Benefits newsletterIn this issue: Shaping Up the Pyramid Way - the latest US government guidelines on nutrition and exercise, and more!Modified May 9, 2005 5:00:45 PM EDT

Hi
I have similar problem. I get follwing message when i run the bat file in dos prompt "SavedSearchMailer got 0 results for this subscriber 0" eventhough sanp shot qury have resuilts. any idea whats causing this
F:\Program Files\plumtree\jre\bin>"F:\Program Files\plumtree\ptportal\5.0\scripts\SavedSearchMailer.bat" "2399|1121447028|vAqqK6+GDzlFE7xuOkkHSQd7+YI=" 246 "12/07/2005 3:34:47 PM" "Portal Administrator" xxxx.macgen.com.au MACQUARIE N/A N/A [email protected]/html charset=utf-8 "<search_name> savedsearch results for <name>" "<html><body >hhh</body></html>"Starting Saved Search Mailer...SavedSearchMailer invoked with 13 arguments: 0: 2399|1121447028|vAqqK6+GDzlFE7xuOkkHSQd7+YI= 1: 246 2: 12/07/2005 3:34:47 PM 3: Portal Administrator 4: xxxx.macgen.com.au 5: MACQUARIE 6: N/A 7: N/A 8: [email protected] 9: text/html 10: charset=utf-8 11: <search_name> saved search results for <name> 12: <html><body >hhh</body></html>SavedSearchMailer invoked with 13 arguments: 0:2399|1121447028|vAqqK6+GDzlFE7xuOkkHSQd7+YI= 1:246 2:12/07/2005 3:34:47 PM 3:Portal Administrator 4:mgmail.macgen.com.au 5:MACQUARIE 6:N/A 7:N/A 8:[email protected] 9:text/html 10:charset=utf-8 11:<search_name> saved search results for <name> 12:<html><body>hhh</body></html>.SavedSearchMailer accessed saved search 246 and found 1 subscribersSavedSearchMailer processes subscriber #0 - Ranaweera, MahendraSavedSearchMailer got 0 results for this subscriber

Converting user level personalizations to site level personalizations

Hi All,
My Requirement is as follows:
In one search page i have created one view to save my search by providing view name.
Now if i login from different user i am not able to see that view name in the drop down which i have created from different login.
i intend to see that view for all users even if create from single login.
i know that save search is user level personalization, but i want to get the same at site level.
but while creating there is option like site level or responsibility level.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Naren.

Hi Reetesh,
find the below steps.
let me know if you need any clarity.
Create, Duplicate, Update or Delete an "admin-seeded user-level" personalization :-
==================================================
Select the Personalize pen icon to launch a focused version of the Page Hierarchy Personalization page for a selected boxed region.
Use the Hierarchy Page HGrid to identify the query region for which you wish to create an "admin-seeded user-level" personalization. (You can create seeded user-level personalizations only for a table or a HGrid in a query region.)
Select the Seeded User Views icon to launch the Personalize Views page where you can create, update, duplicate or delete "Admin-seeded user level" personalizations.
When you create, duplicate or update a seeded view, you navigate to the respective Create/Duplicate/Update Views page. Select Apply to save your changes when you are done.
Regards,
Naren.

Saved search not navigating for only one user

Hi Everyone,
I have a saved search that navigates for all users except one. Furthermore, on that same search screen if I use a different object type, do a search and save it, the saved search works for that user. So it seems like it is related to the object type I'm searching for.
since it is working for some users, I don't think it is related to some IP or OP settings.
any idea what could cause this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Ralph

It seems someone has set the user policy at webapplication level for that user.Check the similar thread below
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/es-ES/18b4f019-093d-45f6-92b7-8350d13bd663/let-us-know-why-you-need-access-to-this-site-why-do-i-see-this-error-and-who-will-give-access?forum=sharepointgeneral
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

How to hide the columns at the end user level thru personalization

Hi all
how I can hide the columns that are displayed on the portal. Any personalize option for the end user? Any righ click or some thing?
I am looking at hiding columns not while developing the iViews / Pages, But in the browsers as the end user.
i can hide the columns what ever i want while creating the iViews for MDM data. but we cant provide the content administrator role to the end user for hiding the columns what ever they want. they want to hide the columns thru pesonalization option at the end user level.
Can you please let me know whether we can able to hide the columns at the end user level thru personalization ?? is it posible with standard iViews??
Regards
Sunil

Hi Sunil,
I understood your requirement properly and seems valid and I tried this at my end but i didnt get the solution. Field list is not visible in Personalize option. I dont think it is possible with MDM standard iViews.
I was thinking an alternative is if some how we manage to give the permissions to end user only on Result Set iView but if it would be possible it will not be a good design.
Lets wait for some inputs from others.
Regards,
Jitesh Talreja

Best way to store user-saved searches/forms

Hello,
in our project, we want to give to our users ability to save form fields values for later use. It will be named the fast OR saved searches.
We have a relatively huge number of search forms, each one with specific fields. So I don't want, if possible, to use a distinct table for each form.
The good and logic way to design the table for this purpose looks like :
SAVED_USERS_FORMS (
USER_ID NUMBER,
-- corresponding user
FORM_ID NUMBER,
-- system wide unique form identificator (maybe varchar2 code rather than number?)
SAVED_NAME VARCHAR2,
-- name of the shorcut/saved form, by user
FIELDS_VALUES ???????,
-- saved fields key/values for PK (user, form, name) combination
PRIMARY KEY (USER_ID, FORM_ID, SAVED_NAME)
The hesitation here is : how to store the fields & values pairs?
- XML field?
- our custom text structure and formating representing something key => value
- our custom serialized java object into a field
I think that the EAV modelling technique approach can be a flexible way to achieve our goal, but as I read on the net there's an important set of downsides with this approach. But, this way, my table is something like:
SAVED_USERS_FORMS (
USER_ID NUMBER,
FORM_ID NUMBER,
SAVED_NAME VARCHAR2,
FIELD_NAME VARCHAR2,
FIELD_VALUE ????,
-- saved field key/values for PK (user, form, name, field name) combination
PRIMARY KEY (USER_ID, FORM_ID, SAVED_NAME, FIELD_NAME)
So the new problem can be the field FIELD_VALUE type enforcement. Do we need to have a field for each data type, so validation complexity can increase dramatically...
Do we need or is suggested to have in a way or another metadata tables describing supported form fields, datatypes, etc?
Other things to take into account:
* simple and scalable solution, heh, ye, please.
* what happens if the form evolve over time? the final solution must not crash or cause some kind of inconsistencies.
* ..... others ..... ?
Other info: we're using Oracle Database 10g, JDEV, JSF, ADF, Business Components.
thanks for any help or comments
Bruno

Hello,
in our project, we want to give to our users ability to save form fields values for later use. It will be named the fast OR saved searches.
We have a relatively huge number of search forms, each one with specific fields. So I don't want, if possible, to use a distinct table for each form.
The good and logic way to design the table for this purpose looks like :
SAVED_USERS_FORMS (
USER_ID NUMBER,
-- corresponding user
FORM_ID NUMBER,
-- system wide unique form identificator (maybe varchar2 code rather than number?)
SAVED_NAME VARCHAR2,
-- name of the shorcut/saved form, by user
FIELDS_VALUES ???????,
-- saved fields key/values for PK (user, form, name) combination
PRIMARY KEY (USER_ID, FORM_ID, SAVED_NAME)
The hesitation here is : how to store the fields & values pairs?
- XML field?
- our custom text structure and formating representing something key => value
- our custom serialized java object into a field
I think that the EAV modelling technique approach can be a flexible way to achieve our goal, but as I read on the net there's an important set of downsides with this approach. But, this way, my table is something like:
SAVED_USERS_FORMS (
USER_ID NUMBER,
FORM_ID NUMBER,
SAVED_NAME VARCHAR2,
FIELD_NAME VARCHAR2,
FIELD_VALUE ????,
-- saved field key/values for PK (user, form, name, field name) combination
PRIMARY KEY (USER_ID, FORM_ID, SAVED_NAME, FIELD_NAME)
So the new problem can be the field FIELD_VALUE type enforcement. Do we need to have a field for each data type, so validation complexity can increase dramatically...
Do we need or is suggested to have in a way or another metadata tables describing supported form fields, datatypes, etc?
Other things to take into account:
* simple and scalable solution, heh, ye, please.
* what happens if the form evolve over time? the final solution must not crash or cause some kind of inconsistencies.
* ..... others ..... ?
Other info: we're using Oracle Database 10g, JDEV, JSF, ADF, Business Components.
thanks for any help or comments
Bruno

How to remove all the users personalization at once?

Hello,
I would like to remove all the personalization the users have made in their portal display (for example, theme).
How do I do it?
Roy

Found it under the support section.
Support->Portal Content Directory->Personalization cleanup

Remove Saved Search functionality from Web IC

Hi Experts,
I have a view where in there is a component related to Saved Searches functionality that is appearing on the Web IC. Now, for my client, they do not want those fields to be visible.
So, I wanted to know how can those fields related to Saved search be removed from the Web IC.
I checked the configuration of the components used in that view and also for component usages of the component. But I did not find any component usage for the Saved search component. This sounds weird but I am not able to find out from where this Saved search component is displayed on the Web IC screen.
We didn't have this earlier in our system. This is introduced after we upgraded our system from CRM 6.0 to CRM 7.0 EHP2.
I have attached the screen shot of my view where the Saved Search fields are available.
Please suggest me some method by which these fields can be removed. Also, if there is any configuration in SPRO where this can be checked.
Thanks,
Preeti

Hi Preeti,
Can you check if your view belongs to a viewset? If so, try to find there in correspoding html code for tag "thtmlb:searchSavingArea", something like this:
<thtmlb:searchSavingArea>
<bsp:call comp_id = "<%= controller->GET_VIEWAREA_CONTENT_ID( 'SavedSearchRegistration' ) %>"
url = "<%= controller->GET_VIEWAREA_CONTENT_URL( 'SavedSearchRegistration' ) %>" />
</thtmlb:searchSavingArea>
Try to comment it and check if it works (I've never tried it ).
Kind regards,
Garcia

User level personalization not available

Hi All,
I went to one of our OA pages and clicked Personalize page. I m trying to personalize an item at user level. I see only Site, Function, Organization and Responsibility and can't see user level .
Please let me know what needs to be done to enable the user level personalization for that page/item.

User Personalization specifies whether the user can personalize a item. This property is relevant only in the case of user-defined views. Items that have the User Personalization property set to true only can be personalized by the user in the Create/Update Views page.
Thanks
--Anil

Af:query saved search not getting deleted.

hi,
I have a af:query component in which I am setting saveQueryMode="default".
As per the docs, setting this value to default implies: "default: all saved searches are displayed. In addition any saved search can be created but only user saved searches can be deleted/updated."
I fire a search on the query component and then save it as "mysearch".
I then try to personalize it.
However, here I don't find the Delete button enabled for it.
I want the user saved searches to be deletable.
Am I missing anything here?
Thanks.

Simo,
I guess you have to look for MDS or Meta data service. MDS stores changes to the ui like table layout and query state for each user in a central store (db or file).
To use MDS you must use ADF security as this gives MDS the user ID.
I can't search for more info right now as I'm not in front of my pc. Check the doc for MDS and you find more info.
Timo

How to implement saved search delete feature in af:query

Hi,
I have implement MDS for af:query. However, delete button in "Personalized" window of af:query is still being disable.
My test flow is the following:
1) fire a search on the query component and then save it as "savedSearch1".
2) then try to personalize it. Observed that "Delete" button in Personalize window is being disable. Not able to delete "savedSearch1"
My question is: Is there a way for me to enable the "Delete" Button at the personalized window so that user can delete the saved search?
I have af:query component with the following code:
<af:query id="qryId1" headerText="#{uiBundle.SEARCH}" disclosed="true"
value="#{bindings.KanbanCardSummaryVOCriteriaQuery.queryDescriptor}"
model="#{bindings.KanbanCardSummaryVOCriteriaQuery.queryModel}"
queryListener="#{KanbanSummaryBean.queryListener}"
queryOperationListener="#{bindings.KanbanCardSummaryVOCriteriaQuery.processQueryOperation}"
resultComponentId="::pc1:t1" maxColumns="2" rows="1"/>

Hi,
Does anyone knows the answer for this question?
Thanks,
Hong

Remove Personalization at User Level - Saved Searches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for