Reserve Bandwidth / QoS

Hello,
I have a site that has a T1 - I need to reserve the bandwidt for all internet traffic to 90% of that T1, while allowing the voice traffic which is on a specific port to use all 100% of the bandwidth. Please advise on to the best way to achieve this.
Any assistance with achieving this would be greatly appreciated.

Hello Michael,
This will need to be done with QoS priority with Policing or shaping.
Please follow the next document:
http://brian-kayser.blogspot.com/2010/10/doing-asa-quality-of-service-qos.html
That should do it for you.
Julio

Similar Messages

  • Available bandwindth and 'max-reserved bandwidth'

    Is the max-reserved bandwidth only important when working with Qos classes and the bandwidth statement? Is the default 75% available bandwidth only used then?
    In other words if I have a 100MB link with a service policy applied for Voice, Call-Control and video. After that I notice the available bandwidth on thie 100MB link is 61280 kilobits/sec.
    If I put in a 'max-reserved bandwidth 95' would I reclaim another 20MB of bandwidth for the class-default? Would leaving 5% on the 100MB link for routing and other stuff be acceptable?
    Here is the config and show commands:
    class-map match-any Call-Control
    match ip dscp cs3
    match ip dscp af31
    class-map match-any Video
    match ip dscp af41
    class-map match-any Voice
    match ip dscp ef
    policy-map QOS_classes_to_ACN
    class Voice
    priority 10000
    class Call-Control
    bandwidth 500
    class Video
    bandwidth 3220
    class class-default
    fair-queue
    random-detect
    interface FastEthernet6/0
    description 100MB Link to ACN
    ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
    ip route-cache flow
    no ip mroute-cache
    load-interval 30
    duplex full
    speed 100
    service-policy output QOS_classes_to_ACN
    ROC-RT7206-QMOE#sh int f6/0
    FastEthernet6/0 is up, line protocol is up
    Hardware is i82543 (Livengood), address is 00b0.4a28.3ca8 (bia 00b0.4a28.3ca8)
    Description: 100MB Link to ACN
    Internet address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx
    MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
    reliability 255/255, txload 183/255, rxload 21/255
    Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
    Keepalive set (10 sec)
    Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
    ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
    Last input 00:00:03, output 00:00:00, output hang never
    Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:13:30
    Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 5211742
    Queueing strategy: Class-based queueing
    Output queue: 70/1000/64/5211742 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
    Conversations 2/35/256 (active/max active/max total)
    Reserved Conversations 2/2 (allocated/max allocated)
    Available Bandwidth 61280 kilobits/sec <--- Available bandwidth
    30 second input rate 8615000 bits/sec, 6860 packets/sec
    30 second output rate 71788000 bits/sec, 7484 packets/sec
    31692173 packets input, 4263195179 bytes
    Received 1204 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
    0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
    0 watchdog
    0 input packets with dribble condition detected
    34536300 packets output, 2513155446 bytes, 0 underruns
    0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
    0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
    0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
    0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

    Here is the output of show policy-pam int:
    ROC-RT7206-QMOE#sh policy-map int f6/0
    FastEthernet6/0
    Service-policy output: QOS_classes_to_ACN
    Class-map: Voice (match-any)
    3417571 packets, 934178998 bytes
    30 second offered rate 1722000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip dscp ef (46)
    3417571 packets, 934178998 bytes
    30 second rate 1722000 bps
    Queueing
    Strict Priority
    Output Queue: Conversation 264
    Bandwidth 10000 (kbps) Burst 250000 (Bytes)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 1908656/521903140
    (total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
    Class-map: Call-Control (match-any)
    615085 packets, 48926098 bytes
    30 second offered rate 84000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
    588857 packets, 47299978 bytes
    30 second rate 81000 bps
    Match: ip dscp af31 (26)
    26228 packets, 1626120 bytes
    30 second rate 2000 bps
    Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 265
    Bandwidth 500 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 337953/26882724
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    Class-map: Video (match-any)
    146136 packets, 82165408 bytes
    30 second offered rate 90000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip dscp af41 (34)
    146136 packets, 82165408 bytes
    30 second rate 90000 bps
    Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 266
    Bandwidth 3220 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 81687/45950190
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    35227089 packets, 47492000208 bytes
    30 second offered rate 87718000 bps, drop rate 14714000 bps
    Match: any
    Queueing
    Flow Based Fair Queueing
    Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 256
    (total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/5171786/0
    exponential weight: 9
    class Transmitted Random drop Tail drop Minimum Maximum Mark
    pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes thresh thresh prob
    0 30181523/39910255774 1297726/1944176143 3893194/5836883998 20 40 1/10
    1 0/0 0/0 0/0 22 40 1/10
    2 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10
    3 0/0 0/0 0/0 26 40 1/10
    4 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10
    5 0/0 0/0 0/0 30 40 1/10
    6 1213/88749 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10
    7 0/0 0/0 0/0 34 40 1/10
    rsvp 0/0 0/0 0/0 36 40 1/10

  • Max-reserved bandwidth confusion

    Hi all,
    Can someone please help me to understand bandwidth reservation for CBWFQ.
    By default you cannot allocate more than 75% of the interface bandwidth to your classes. My question is what is the point? theoretically it is reserved for your routing protocols etc.etc. but in reality if the interface is saturated isn't that extra 25% used by whatever traffic anyway? it not like you guarantee a maximum of 75%, you guarantee a minimum of 75% so the additional 25% is still up for grabs, it's just that it's not reserved for any class in particular.
    hope the question makes sense.
    Thanks,
    Andres

    Hi Andres,
    On low speed links, WFQ is the default. So in the case that you have a link with less than 768 kbps, it will be running WFQ. With WFQ, it's not so much 'up for grabs'. WFQ is based on packet size, DSCP values, and time in queue.
    Generally, router control packets aren't very large, and by default they are usually in the DSCP 48-64 range, which is very high. So in this case, the control packets are very high priority.
    As well, control packets are marked with a special tag on the backplane of most routers (platform specific) to give an even high level of precedence within the router.
    When the max-reserved bandwidth is a very high value, it is more likely for the traffic to have a higher interference with these two methods (particularly the first).
    hth,
    nick

  • Max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface

    According to CCO as following text, the remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic. I want to know why cisco choose 25 percent. why not 30% or 20%?
    If I config the max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface, does it will effect the routing protocol? also effect the network conectivity?
    thanks for your answer
    =======
    Usage Guidelines for max-reserved-bandwidth
    The sum of all bandwidth allocation on an interface should not exceed 75 percent of the available bandwidth on an interface. The remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic.
    If you need to allocate more than 75 percent for RSVP, CBWFQ, LLQ, IP RTP Priority, Frame Relay IP RTP Priority, and Frame Relay PIPQ, you can use the max-reserved-bandwidth command. The percent argument specifies the maximum percentage of the total interface bandwidth that can be used.
    If you do use the max-reserved-bandwidth command, make sure that not too much bandwidth is taken away from best-effort and control traffic.
    The max-reserved-bandwidth command is intended for use on main interfaces only; it has no effect on virtual circuits (VCs) or ATM permanent virtual circuits (PVCs).

    Kevin,
    this is the wrong group for this question.
    Gilles.

  • "Insufficient Bandwidth" QoS workaround?

    Does anybody have a workaround for the "Insufficient Bandwidth" problem that has plagued iChat 3 users. I have troublshot everthing I can think of, and the only thing I can come up with is my ISP says they are in the process of "bettering" their QoS service. Is there a way to make iChat 3 work like iChat 2 by turning QoS off?
    HELP!!!

    Hi,
    It may be how this commbo is set up
    airport card/ netgear router/motorola cable modem
    IF the Netgear is using DHCP to give out addresses then the modem needs to be set to pass through the Public IP address or be Static to the router. This will get around any Double DHCP problems.
    The next thing to consider is if the modem is Static it will need the ports to be opened. In this case the Modem and the router should not be using Port Forwarding or NAT to open the ports as iChat does not like Double NAT situations.
    Port Triggering or UPnP to open the ports will allow multiple computers to access the net using the same ports if required.
    Ralph

  • Lowering my bandwidth (Qos?) setup help needed

    In order to better decide if a lower bandwidth from my provider will suffice I'm trying to find out if there's a way I can configure my router to limit bandwidth to a certain speed, so as to simulate what this lower speed will feel like.
    Having read several threads on the subject it seems like the "QOS bandwidth management" feature is the way to go, which my RVS-4000 router has. However, even after reading Cisco's configuration guides and other Cisco pages on the subject I'm having trouble setting this up, finding it a bit complicated for a network novice to understand. Can someone please tell me how to set this up?
    Enclosed is a screenshot of my router's QOS page.

    Yes, this seems to be true if you go to the "manual" set-up method. It failed for me too, several times, because of this. Finally, I even tried to set the TC to Create a network of the same specs of the network I wanted it to join. That failed, as expected, because it caused interference with the existing network on my old AirPort Extreme Base Station. My next try was to connect AirPort Utility to the TC (wirelessly from my MacBook) and retry using the easy set-up method. Lo and behold, it worked, and "Join Existing Network" now appears on its Manual Setup panel in AirPort Utility.
    Looks like a little bug in AirPort Utility, having that pop-up menu sometimes missing that item.
    So, long story short, my TC had this problem, and now it works.
    I'd go through the setup from factory reset again to document it exactly, but the family is using it now, so the best I can do is describe it from memory. If the easy setup to Join Existing Network doesn't work for you, then re-do the setup to Create Network with the same specs as the one you want to join. Then when it comes up arguing with the other Base Station ("I am the master of this network." +"No, I am the master of this network!"+), go back to AirPort Utility and connect to the TC, going through the easy setup again, choosing Join instead. Then it might work.

  • Upstream bandwidth QoS profile 5508 WLC

    Hello,
    Is it possible, through a QoS profile, to control how much bandwidth a user gets to use for upstream traffic?  I can easily set limits for downstream traffic, via the per user bandwidth contracts, but it is not obvious to me on how to control upstream traffic.
    Any and all info is appreciated!
    Thanks 

    upstream traffic needs to be defined at L3, via your QoS settings. As you've said, the profile on the WLC is downstream only.
    HTH,
    Steve
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Reserve Bandwidth for a vlan

    Hi all,
    could someone tell me if it is possible to reserve a precise amount of bandwidth for a given vlan on the Aironet1240AG ? If yes, could someone tell me how ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    It seems that it is not possible to reserve a bandwidth for a specific VLAN. these APs are layer 2 devices with limited capabiltites.

  • Linksys SRW248G4 Bandwidth QoS problem

    Hi everyone,
    so I bought the SRW248G4 switch because Linksys advertises ingress and egress traffic shaping. I setup everything and tested egress at 10000 kbps which worked fine. But when I setup ingress on any of the ports I get very bad rates that don't even correspond to the limit I set. For example I can set 10000 kbps or 20000 kbps, and I only get 12-20 KB/s transfer rates, which almost below 196 kbps. Does anyone know why this would not be working? Anyone else out there with a similar problem?
    Thanks,
    Alex

    see thread: http://forums.linksys.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=Switches&message.id=1072

  • Hirarchial (nested) policy bandwidth reservation

    Hi
    My requirement was to run QoS on ethernet sub-interface. To achieve that I have configured the shape (percent) command, in "child" (nested) policy maps, on Cisco 7200.
    IOS: c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.124-15.T1.bin
    Now after applying the policy on sub-interface, the reserved bandwidth for each class is not being shown accurately in "show" commands:
    7206#sh policy-map FastEthernet0/1.1
    FastEthernet0/1.1
    Service-policy output: ABCCosSub
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    478266 packets, 261182209 bytes
    30 second offered rate 12045000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: any
    Traffic Shaping
    Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
    Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
    100 (%) 0 (ms) 0 (ms)
    12157521/12157521 379922 1519688 1519688 125 189961 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Interface bandwidth is 100Mbps
    Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
    Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
    - 299 477918 261784898 268596 152975206 yes
    Service-policy : ABCCos
    Class-map: ControlClass (match-any)
    8506 packets, 959869 bytes
    30 second offered rate 45000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip precedence 6
    4546 packets, 480554 bytes
    30 second rate 23000 bps
    Match: mpls experimental topmost 6
    3960 packets, 479315 bytes
    30 second rate 22000 bps
    Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 265
    Bandwidth 20 (%)
    Bandwidth 2431 (kbps) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>reserved bandwidth must be 20% of 100Mbps
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 4116/478504
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 2/0/0
    exponential weight: 9
    mean queue depth: 3
    Attached is the configuration of the router and complete output of "Show policy-map", "Show interface" commands.
    rgds/bsn

    Below URL for the QoS configuration (policy based) follow the configuration guide which may help you :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/configuration/guide/qcfpbr_ps1835_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

  • QoS bandwidth rate limit don't work

    Hello
    Buy a router RV120W, and one of the reasons is limit of bandwidth (QoS). I set up a profile of 1-256 kbps limit, and apply it to the only VLAN that is configured, but does not work and can navigate using the full bandwidth of the internet connection. My firmware version is 1.0.2.6
    Screenshots attached
    thanks
    screenshots attached

    Struggling with a similar issue:
    the setup: internet adsl <--1mbs--> combined router/modem <--100mbs--> RV 120W
    Internet speed is 1mbs. I want to priotize voip calls (via port) and deprioritize one machine (doing downloads). rest of the network should have something in between.
    Firmware upgraded to 1.0.3.10
    I created the profiles bindings, then in QoS settings, selected Priority, Wan total bandwidth 1mbs, and distributed my profiles onto low/med/high (10/31/61).
    When what should be low is downloading, it gets the whole 1mbs and the other are dead slow.
    Changed to rate limit, changed the parameters, etc... no more luck.
    Can you please shed some light as how to configure this - in my case, the whole bw of wan is being used, and prioriization is not happening,
    Rgds

  • RSVP reserved TE bandwidth

    Hi,
    I have a scenerio where i wish to configure a TE tunnel to run across a link which is only utilised as a backup link by the current MPLS network.
    Am i right in assuming the RSVP bandwidth reservation carried out by the TE tunnel would not be seen by the normal MPLS traffic. IE, in the event of a failure the normal MPLS traffic would not see that perhaps 50% of the link is reserved by the TE tunnel and possibly starve the tunnel of the required bandwidth?
    Garry

    You are right in your assumption. MPLS TE tunnel will seamlessly integrated with the normal IP or MPLS traffic without causing any trouble.
    Also you may want to use 'AutoBandwidth Allocator' for reserving bandwidth instead of allocating constant value manually.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6608/products_white_paper09186a00800a4472.shtml#wp39742

  • Router Dead , when i applied QOS on virtual-temp interface for vpn !!

    hi all ,
    i have a simple brief topology below :
    PSTN======(R1-7206)>F1=======F2>(R2-7604 catalyst)>>>F1=========Internet
    i have two router
    R2========>MLS 7604
    R1======>cisco 7204
    on R2 , Im doing matching to QOS by dscp , im matching acls ips from internet with dscp values :
    here is CONFIG for matching :
    Gateway7600#sh policy-map LLQX
      Policy Map LLQX
        Class YOUTUBE
          set ip dscp af43
        Class FACEBOOKVIDEOS
          set ip dscp af33
        Class HTTP
          set dscp af23
        Class DNSQOS
          set dscp af13
        Class class-default
          set ip dscp af11
    ================
    Gateway7600#sh class-map
    Class Map match-all FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 7)
       Match access-group name  facebookvideos
    Class Map match-all DNSQOS (id 8)
       Match access-group name  dnsqos
    Class Map match-all HTTP (id 6)
       Match access-group name  browsing
    Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
       Match any 
    Class Map match-all YOUTUBE (id 5)
       Match access-group name  youtube
    Gateway7600#
    =========================================================
    on this router i applied this policy map  on interfaxce F1 in  direction
    and here matching is well :
    Gateway7600#sh policy-map  interface gigabitEthernet 1/5 in    
    GigabitEthernet1/5
      Service-policy input: LLQX
        class-map: rate-limit (match-all)
          Match: access-group name rate-limit
          police :
            4088000 bps 384000 limit 384000 extended limit
          Earl in slot 1 :
            139044930 bytes
            30 second offered rate 143032 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 134420937 bytes action: transmit
            exceeded 4623993 bytes action: drop
            aggregate-forward 22544 bps exceed 0 bps
        class-map: YOUTUBE (match-all)
          Match: access-group name youtube
          set dscp 38:
          Earl in slot 1 :
            132693939697 bytes
            30 second offered rate 212144928 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 132693939697 bytes
        class-map: FACEBOOKVIDEOS (match-all)
          Match: access-group name facebookvideos
          set dscp 30:
          Earl in slot 1 :
            10726758352 bytes
            30 second offered rate 20682720 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 10726758352 bytes
        class-map: HTTP (match-all)
          Match: access-group name browsing
          set dscp 22:
          Earl in slot 1 :
            56874058537 bytes
            30 second offered rate 92669832 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 56874058537 bytes
        class-map: DNSQOS (match-all)
          Match: access-group name dnsqos
          set dscp 14:
          Earl in slot 1 :
            160308954 bytes
            30 second offered rate 303552 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 160308954 bytes
        class-map: class-default (match-any)
          Match: any
          set dscp 10:
          Earl in slot 1 :
            67394864030 bytes
            30 second offered rate 126884864 bps
            aggregate-forwarded 67394864030 bytes
    =================================================================================
    now the problem is below
    on router 7200 , it is LNS router connected with LAC roiuter for ADSL customers.
    now here is config of policy map on 7200 router:
    R11#sh policy-map
      Policy Map MATCH_MARKS
        Class MATCH_YOUTUBE
          bandwidth 220000 (kbps)
        Class MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS
          bandwidth 20000 (kbps)
        Class MATCH_HTTP
          bandwidth 100000 (kbps)
    =========================================================
    R1#sh class-map
    Class Map match-all MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 2)
       Match ip  dscp af33 (30)
    Class Map match-all MATCH_HTTP (id 3)
       Match ip  dscp af23 (22)
    Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
       Match any
    Class Map match-all MATCH_YOUTUBE (id 1)
       Match ip  dscp af43 (38)
    ==========================================================
    here is virtual-template interface before i apply the QOS
    R1#sh running-config interface virtual-template 1
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 352 bytes
    interface Virtual-Template1
    bandwidth 1000000
    ip unnumbered Loopback0
    ip tcp adjust-mss 1412
    ip policy route-map private
    no logging event link-status
    qos pre-classify
    peer default ip address pool bitsead1 bitsead2
    ppp mtu adaptive
    ppp authentication pap vpdn
    ppp authorization vpdn
    ppp accounting vpdn
    max-reserved-bandwidth 90
    end
    =========================================
    when i apply the command
    (service-poliy output MATCH_MAKRS ) under virtual-template  interface i have console logs :
    Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
    Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
    Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
    also i have
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.242: Interface Virtual-Access2551 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.250: Interface Virtual-Access627 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.258: Interface Virtual-Access786 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.266: Interface Virtual-Access623 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.274: Interface Virtual-Access2559 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.282: Interface Virtual-Access2281 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:38.290: Interface Virtual-Access142 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul  9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278,  -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACCD0z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
    *Jul  9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278,  -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACD28z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
    after i apply it ,
    the cpu is 100 %  and the router got down !!!
    now
    what is  the problem ????
    here is ios for 7200 router
    R1#sh version
    Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Tue 28-Feb-12 12:53 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Bras1 uptime is 13 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 24 minutes
    System returned to ROM by reload at 16:24:51 GMT+3 Tue Jun 17 2003
    System image file is "disk2:c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"
    Last reload reason: Reload Command
    This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
    States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
    use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
    third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
    Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
    compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
    agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
    to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
    A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
    http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
    If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
    [email protected].
    Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID 36858624
    MPC7448 CPU at 1666Mhz, Implementation 0, Rev 2.2
    6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.11
    Last reset from power-on
    PCI bus mb1 (Slots 1, 3 and 5) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
    Current configuration on bus mb1 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
    This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
    PCI bus mb2 (Slots 2, 4 and 6) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
    Current configuration on bus mb2 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
    This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
    Please refer to the following document "Cisco 7200 Series Port Adaptor
    Hardware Configuration Guidelines" on Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com>
    for c7200 bandwidth points oversubscription and usage guidelines.
    1 FastEthernet interface
    3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
    2045K bytes of NVRAM.
    250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 2 (Sector size 512 bytes).
    65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
    Configuration register is 0x2102
    ==============================================================================
    wish to Help ASAP
    regards

    hi ,
    i did
    the same issue ,
    i did a TEST policymap that has 30 percent gurantee
    but the same result!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    the router  god down agian !
    here is logs :
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.605: Interface Virtual-Access1896 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.797: Interface Virtual-Access1317 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.809: Interface Virtual-Access993 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.817: Interface Virtual-Access1699 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.981: Interface Virtual-Access254 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:33.993: Interface Virtual-Access687 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.001: Interface Virtual-Access35 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.009: Interface Virtual-Access160 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.017: Interface Virtual-Access1337 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.029: Interface Virtual-Access1670 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.037: Interface Virtual-Access1948 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.049: Interface Virtual-Access1669 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.109: Interface Virtual-Access1334 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.117: Interface Virtual-Access151 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.125: Interface Virtual-Access761 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.137: Interface Virtual-Access810 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.197: Interface Virtual-Access1522 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.237: Interface Virtual-Access1692 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.257: Interface Virtual-Access368 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.305: Interface Virtual-Access1758 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.317: Interface Virtual-Access2061 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.325: Interface Virtual-Access1203 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.337: Interface Virtual-Access188 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.345: Interface Virtual-Access1975 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.357: Interface Virtual-Access1172 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.509: Interface Virtual-Access1647 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.517: Interface Virtual-Access458 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.609: Interface Virtual-Access608 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.621: Interface Virtual-Access2128 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.633: Interface Virtual-Access1167 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.641: Interface Virtual-Access487 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.653: Interface Virtual-Access1793 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.665: Interface Virtual-Access2280 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.769: Interface Virtual-Access839 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.781: Interface Virtual-Access2311 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.793: Interface Virtual-Access1788 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.857: Interface Virtual-Access8 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.869: Interface Virtual-Access2243 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:34.881: Interface Virtual-Access580 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.057: Interface Virtual-Access6 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.065: Interface Virtual-Access1331 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.077: Interface Virtual-Access1235 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.177: Interface Virtual-Access1748 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.189: Interface Virtual-Access2262 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    *Jul 11 02:40:35.205: Interface Virtual-Access2136 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
    take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
    i want to ask a question , could this be from IOS ????

  • WRR QoS unused traffic classes

    We are planning QoS for the enterprise LAN and MPLS core. At present, there are 5 traffic classes identified and no VoIP traffic. We could allocate resources and bandwidth for 5 queues and deploy such configs. But I guess it's worth defining all 8 classes and allocate queue limits and bandwidth to them. Later it will be easier to mark the new traffic and classify it into the unused queues without modifying the wrr config.
    67xx 1p7q8t line card
    Q3 and Q8(PQ) will not be used. 5+15% is allocated to them.
    priority-queue queue-limit 15
    wrr-queue queue-limit 30 15 5 10 15 5 5
    wrr-queue bandwidth percent 30 15 5 10 15 5 5
    I'm not sure if the allocated bandwidth and queue limit for the unused queues will affect  the existing traffic and limit the aggregated traffic quantity. Will the 5 classes be able to fill the bandwidth until there is no congestion? What happens in case of congestion? Can the traffic excess 80% or not? (For simplicity, 100% is regarded as a fraction of link capacity defined by max-reserved-bandwidth)

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Generally, unless you're shaping or policing, bandwidth sharing commands provide a minimum bandwidth guarantee, and unused bandwidth can be used by other queues.  Also when working with more than one queue, relative ratios are usually preserved.  So, for instance, if q1 was configured for 25%, q2 for 25% and q3 for 50%, if q2 had no traffic, and q1 and q3 wanted all they could have, they would split the bandwidth 1:2 or 1/3 to 2/3.

  • QoS (RPM)

    Hi, guys!, using MPLS VPN, using a MGX 8830 (RPM) providing QoS to costumer; costumer is complaining about voice cuts when passing data...we`re using Multilink (ppp) interfaces fot the costumer, the conf:
    class-map match-any VOZ
    match ip dscp ef
    match ip precedence 5
    class-map match-all Signaling
    match access-group name Signaling
    class-map match-all DataPlus
    match ip dscp af22
    policy-map QOS
    class VOZ
    priority percent 50
    class Signaling
    bandwidth percent 12
    class DataPlus
    bandwidth percent 25
    class class-default
    fair-queue
    interface Multilink2001
    description COSTUMER
    ip vrf forwarding COSTUMER
    ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
    max-reserved-bandwidth 88
    service-policy output QOS
    load-interval 30
    ppp multilink
    ppp multilink fragment-delay 10
    ppp multilink interleave
    multilink-group 2001
    interface Virtual-Template1
    description COSTUMER
    no ip address
    ppp multilink
    multilink-group 2001
    And the PVC for the RPM:
    interface Switch1.2001 point-to-point
    description COSTUMER
    pvc 0/201
    ubr 150
    oam-pvc 10
    encapsulation aal5ciscoppp Virtual-Template1
    no protocol ip inarp
    switch connection vcc 0 201 master remote
    pcr 354
    cost 4294967295
    rpcr 480
    rutil 100
    util 100
    In the CPE is seems OK the conf, in facto we applied an ACL on the CPE receiver interface (Multilink), and it seems is receiving good marking, i`m just not very sure about what (0) means...a port??:
    Apr 19 09:40:34: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 102 permitted udp 1.1.1.1(0) -> 1.1.1.2 (0), 2 packets
    Apr 19 10:49:05: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 permitted udp 1.1.1.1(5004) -> 1.1.1.2(5004), 1 packet
    Apr 19 10:54:44: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 102 permitted udp 1.1.1.1(0) -> 1.1.1.2(0), 1002 packets
    Apr 19 10:54:44: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 permitted udp 1.1.1.1(5004) -> 1.1.1.2(5004), 1018 packets
    i can`t find any conf issue..can anyone give any ideas for troubleshooting?, thanks!!

    Hi, thanks for the answer, yes , the policy is supposed to be working:
    RPM#sh policy-map interface multilink 2001
    Multilink2001
    Service-policy output: QOS
    Class-map: VOZ (match-any)
    773079 packets, 44114342 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip dscp ef
    773079 packets, 44114342 bytes
    30 second rate 0 bps
    Match: ip precedence 5
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    30 second rate 0 bps
    Queueing
    Strict Priority
    Output Queue: Conversation 72
    Bandwidth 50 (%)
    Bandwidth 75 (kbps) Burst 1875 (Bytes)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 773079/44114342
    (total drops/bytes drops) 49/9996
    Class-map: Signaling (match-all)
    5 packets, 349 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: access-group name Signaling
    Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 73
    Bandwidth 12 (%)
    Bandwidth 18 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 5/349
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    Class-map: DataPlus (match-all)
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: ip dscp af22
    Queueing
    Output Queue: Conversation 74
    Bandwidth 25 (%)
    Bandwidth 37 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
    (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
    2462195 packets, 380288459 bytes
    30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
    Match: any
    Queueing
    Flow Based Fair Queueing
    Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 64
    (total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
    RPM#
    Talking about the signaling, i`m using an ACL :
    Extended IP access list Signaling
    10 permit tcp any eq 1720 any (15615 matches)
    20 permit tcp any any eq 1720 (344 matches)
    In order to match these ports, the BW is a 128 kbps; and this problem only happens on an RPM with PPP, not with a normal router with CBWFQ with FR; everything seems to be OK, but the costumer`s config also seems OK..on an ACL that i put on the costumer`s Multilink i`m seeing that the packets are arriving matched; but the problem is still alive...any suggestions for test????, i`ll appreciate it...

Maybe you are looking for