Resistance measurement using PCI-6602

Hello,
I would like to measure the resistance between 2 points using my PCI-6602 counter/timer card while using LabVIEW. The resistance values to be measured will vary between 10 ohms and 1000 ohms approximately.
I found three examples in LabVIEW example finder for measuring resistance but am not sure which one to use. Moreover, which pins of the PCI-6602 would be used for measuring the resistance?
Please advise me how I could use this PCI-6602 card for measuring resistance values and what the pin configuration would be.
Thank you,
Viktoriya.

As you have written, the PCI-6602 is a counter/timer board. It has no analog input and is not suited for analog measurements !

Similar Messages

Counter using PCI-6602 for multi output

Hi guys,
currently I tried to control a linearmotor using PCI-6052E and PCI-6602.
The questions is, how to use PCI-6602 to be a counter which will be converted to several output (multioutput):
(1) converted to position >> 1count = ...[mm] --> position measurement
(2) converted to voltage >> 1count = ...[mV] or [V] --> voltage measurement
(3) converted to current >> 1count = ...[mA] or [A] --> current measurement
(4) converted to velocity >> 1count = ...[mm/s] --> velocity measurement
(5) converted to acceleration >> 1count = ...[mm/s^2] --> acceleration measurement
(6) converted to force >> 1count = ...[N] or [kg.mm/s^2] --> force/load measurement
(7) converted to frequency >> 1count=...[Hz] --> frequency measurement
(i) Please assist me how to connect the driver's encoder (Ch. A A/ B B/ Z Z/) with PCI-6602, so I can get all informations above (7 measurements). What/which port of PCI-6602 connect to where from the driver.
(ii) Please assist me how to connect the feedback signal to the PC. What/which port of PCI-6602 connect to PC.
(iii) How to test those 7 measurements above using Measuremant and Automation Explorer (MAX) ver.4.4.1?
Thank you for your kindly help and assistance.
Best wishes,
hendro

Dear Jochen,
(1) Principally, I'd like to use PCI-6602 to be a motion encoder also be a counter (Is it possible? Due to the manual, it is possible). I expect to have all information, such as position, time, velocity, etc. from that motion encoder (or at least the position and time). It is also expected of using PCI-6602 to do all measurements that I mentioned before . My meaning is, after having a signal from the counter, that 'count' will be converted to desire units under other programs. So, in this case, PCI-6602 is only used to get the 'count'.
Simplified, the voltage command will send to the system (linear motor) through PCI-6052E (-10V to 10V). The actual position or other actual information will be catched (read) by using PCI-6602 (as a motion encoder, also as a counter). Then, this actual position will be used as a feedback, that will be compared to desired position.
Is that also possible to use PCI-6602 be a motion controller + a counter + a frequency measurement in a same time parallely?
I don't decide yet (I don't know) which acquisition rate will be needed/required, higher is better.
(2) I'd like to apply an adaptive robust controller (yes, it is a closed loop system) under matlab with their feature called Real-Time-Workshop instead of using LV.
(3) Power drive for the linear system will be driven by AC servo drive.
Thanks for your help before,
Warmly regards,
hendro

Use PCI-6602 to produce synchronous different TTL singals

I am using PCI-6602,if I want to use two line to producing two different TTL singals,and the two TTL singals must write to lines synchronously.How can I get it,Thank you !!

Hi,
You can generate two pulse trains, one on each counter. If this is what you need, you can do that easly with pulse generation VIs - you can look at the LabVIEW shipping examples - in particular, look at Generate Pulse Train (NI-TIO).vi
Regards,
RamziH.

Relative Level Measurement using PCI-4462

Hi, everyone.
I would like to create a Labview program to test the my radio volume using PCI-4462 and Sound/Vibration Measurement Suite 2011.
Before this, I always use Panasonic VP-7722A to test the radio's volume steps.
There are 31 (0-30) volume steps and I always set the relative level at step 30, at which my reference is 0dB.
Then the volume will be tuned down one step by one step until step 0 for check its attenuation (dB) at each step.
However, I coundn't find the way to perform the same steps using PCI-4462 and Sound/Vibration Measurement Suite 2011 so far.
Kindly need any expert to help and advise on this.
Thanks.

Hi, everyone.
I would like to create a Labview program to test the my radio volume using PCI-4462 and Sound/Vibration Measurement Suite 2011.
Before this, I always use Panasonic VP-7722A to test the radio's volume steps.
There are 31 (0-30) volume steps and I always set the relative level at step 30, at which my reference is 0dB.
Then the volume will be tuned down one step by one step until step 0 for check its attenuation (dB) at each step.
However, I coundn't find the way to perform the same steps using PCI-4462 and Sound/Vibration Measurement Suite 2011 so far.
Kindly need any expert to help and advise on this.
Thanks.

Use PCI-6602 Counters from different threads

Hello,
I have read that DaqMX is thread safe. So is it possible to use several Counters form the PCI-6602 form different threads at the same time?
Thanks
farmer

Hi Farmer,
the DAQ driver is thread safe, that means, that the driver manages the
data flow to your application and no data gets lost in case of
simultaneously tasks in an multichannel acquisition for example. So the
mechanism of how to deploy the data from different channels in your
application threads will be managed by the driver.
It's possible to create parallel threads where an data aquisition with
different channels is running. The new DAQmx driver is a multithreaded
driver, it improves the performance and programming simultaneously is
much easier.
Have a look on the following link for further information to that,
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/E1C8492854855FA98625689E0072E832?OpenDocument
regards,
Nikolai

Noise in thermocouple measurement using PCI-6024E DAQ card

I am using a PCI-6024E DAQ card for thermocouple(TC) measurement. The
TC is installed in the mold cavity of an injection molding (IM)
machine. The leads from the TC are connected to the DAQ card using a
CB-68LP board. I made a temperature mesurment task in LabView 7.0
with the two leads from TC as differential inputs and used CJC value of
25 deg C.
The problem is that when the IM machine is OFF, I get a reasonable temp
reading with some slight noise but as soon as I turn ON the IM machine,
the temp readings go wild with a lot of variations around the mean
value. The temp values also don't go to higher values when the TC is in
contact with the molten plastic in the IM machine.
Do I need to ground something here or put a resistor in the I/O board?
BTW the IM machine is grounded and the TC give correct temp values when
connected to a hand-held temp reader.
Any help will be highly appreciated.

Hello Aftab,
Looks like you need to use bias resistors to reduce the noise. Check out the following tutorial for more information about how to use bias resistors.

Ramping a pulse signal using PCI-6602 card

I'm controlling a stepper motor and need a continuous pulse output with variable frequency. I need to accelerate and decelerate teh motor (It can't start immediately at a high frequency but needs to be ramped up to it). I can't have any hiccups in the signal or the motor can stall. It seemed I had my own ramp program written (which gradually increased the frequency value sent to the counter) to solve this problem, but when I switched to Office2000 I started getting hiccups in my signal. I also have a PCI 1200 card and could use A/O but I think using the counter signals would be better. If I'm wrong let me know. Once I have the motor up to speed I am reading in a pulse signal to analyze with FFT.
thanks for y
our help.

A few thoughts & musings, hope some of them are useful:
1. The sequence for setting a new frequency should be to first load up the new pulse specs (use 1 & 2, not 3 & 4), then issue the "switch cycle" command to 'Counter Control.vi' You can look at NI's example program called 'Pulse Width Modulator' to verify syntax.
2. If your frequencies are low enough and your loop time is fast enough, you may be trying to update the pulse specs before the previous specs have completed a full cycle. This has traditionally been a no-no, though I'm not 100% sure that it remains one with the latest NI-DAQ drivers.
3. No ideas about the possible interaction with MS Windows and/or Office 2000. Haven't used either.
4. (My own latest installment in a multi-year running gripe at NI): Wh
en oh when will we be granted the ability to perform buffered counter OUTPUT operations? Just as in the analog world, one can acquire a signal with AI and then reproduce it with AO, it would be REALLY REALLY handy in the counter world to measure with buffered semi-periods and then reproduce the same pulse train with a buffered output.

If I use pci-6602 DMA, should I alloc DMA Memory after I set MITE? If must,what is the size ?

hi everyone:
please help me, thank you

Hello,
The interrupt that will happen nearest the times that you need is the AI_Start_Interrupt in the Interrupt_A group. This interrupt will occur with each sample clock. By the second time this interrupt fires, the AI FIFO should have the samples from the first conversion. If it is easier to use programmed IO, you can read the samples out of the FIFO until you get all 80.
Additionally, you can set the DMA to send samples as soon as the FIFO is no longer empty...instead of waiting for half full or full. This change will reduce latency for your control loop. You can set AI_FIFO_Mode in AI_Mode_3_Register to 0. By the second time this interrupt fires, you should be able to check how much data is in the DMA ring buffer and read the 80 samples when they are available. You can make the ring buffer larger than 80 samples if you see data getting overwritten.
There is no interrupt associated with 80 samples being available in the FIFO or 80 samples being available/transferred by DMA to the host. X Series has much more flexibility with these interrupts.
I hope this helps!
Steven T.

4-wire resistance measurement with 3706 DMM using 3721-ST plug-in card

Hi,
I am new to labview and trying to get a 4-wire resistance measuremnt . I am kooking for an example program to get a 4-wire resistance measurement using a 3721-ST card on a 3706 Keithley DMM. I have one program where I always get error -1074000000. Thanks a lot for your inputs.
Best,
Chander

As you should be able to determine with Help>Explain Error, it's an instrument error query failure. See if you can run the error query in MAX.
You did not specify where you got the driver or attach the code. The only driver I found was from Keithley. If this is the driver you are using, you should ask them about their code.

Triggering the reading of counter totals (PCI 6602)

Hi,
thanks for reading these lines,
for a special application I need to read the totals of multiple counters
simoltanouesly. The inputs of the counters are connected to quadrature encoders.
Is there a way to reroute the gate to another input pin?
Thanks for taking the time to support me.
live long and prosper
Michael

Dear Jochen,
(1) Principally, I'd like to use PCI-6602 to be a motion encoder also be a counter (Is it possible? Due to the manual, it is possible). I expect to have all information, such as position, time, velocity, etc. from that motion encoder (or at least the position and time). It is also expected of using PCI-6602 to do all measurements that I mentioned before . My meaning is, after having a signal from the counter, that 'count' will be converted to desire units under other programs. So, in this case, PCI-6602 is only used to get the 'count'.
Simplified, the voltage command will send to the system (linear motor) through PCI-6052E (-10V to 10V). The actual position or other actual information will be catched (read) by using PCI-6602 (as a motion encoder, also as a counter). Then, this actual position will be used as a feedback, that will be compared to desired position.
Is that also possible to use PCI-6602 be a motion controller + a counter + a frequency measurement in a same time parallely?
I don't decide yet (I don't know) which acquisition rate will be needed/required, higher is better.
(2) I'd like to apply an adaptive robust controller (yes, it is a closed loop system) under matlab with their feature called Real-Time-Workshop instead of using LV.
(3) Power drive for the linear system will be driven by AC servo drive.
Thanks for your help before,
Warmly regards,
hendro

PCI-6602 Triggered event counting DAQmx

Hi
I'd like to use simple event counting using PCI-6602 (DAQmx) with an internally generated trigger pulse.
But I don't know how to figure out the error message when I use DAQmx Start Trigger.vi
Thanks
Kyu Young
Attachments:
EventCountingTrig.vi ‏21 KB

I'm sorry. I've solved it.

What is a 4-wire resistance measurement?

I'm developing a Labview user interface for setting up analog input channels. AI Config.vi has a measurement mode input cluster that includes a 4-wire ohms option. I hate to admit it but I don't know what that is, when one would want to use it, or how. Can anyone enlighten me?

4-wire resistance measurements are used when you need either very-high accuracy, or the measurement leads are very long. The way a normal 2-wire resistance measurement works is that a fixed current is passed through the resistance being measured and the meter reads the voltage drop across the unknown resistance, and Ohm's law allows the meter to calculate the resistance. The problem is that this technique read the total resistance (including the test leads and any connection resistance).
A 4-Wire resistance measurement uses seperate sets of leads for applying the current to the unknown resistance and for measuring the voltage drop across the resistance. This gives very accurate measurements because the sense inputs to the meter have very very high impedence,
resulting in very very small current flow through the sense leads. Thanks again to Ohm's law, very very small current flow means very very small voltage drop in the wires, resulting in very very small measurement error--regardless of how long the measurement leads are.
Or at least that's the theory.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

PCI 6602:How can I use the digital lines of the board and in the same time to generate pulse train using a counter?

Hello!
My problem appeared when I tried to update my code from Traditional NI-DAQ Legacy to DAQmx.
I am using 2 counters (counter 5 and counter 7) from PCI-6602, to generate pulse train, and also the Digital I/O lines of the port 0 (the lines form 0 to 7). What I do in my application is that I am starting to generate the pulse train on the output of the 2 counters, and after that I am playing with the state of the digital lines.
In traditional there was no problem using the counters and the digital lines in the same time, everything was going perfectly, but in DAQmx this is not possible.
What happens: I start to generate pulse train on the output of the counters, no errors encountered, but when I try to modify the state of one line of the digital port the generation of the pulse train is stopped. This is happening when I start the task associated to the digital port.
My question is: it is possible to create a channel on the digital lines without altered the channels created for the counters?
Another thing what I manage to see using the "Measurement & Automation Explorer" and Test panels for PCI-6602, basically is the same thing, I generate pulse train on the output of the counter 7 and try to start a task on the digital line, but I get one error :
"Error -200022 occurred at Test Panel
Possible Reason(s):
Measurements: Resource requested by this task has already been reserved by a different task.
Device: Dev4
Terminal: PFI8"
Instead if I use the counter 0 or counter 1 to generate pulse train I don't encounter the same problem.
Which resources are used by the counters 2 to 7 from the PCI-6602 board and the counters 0 and 1 do not use?
Thank in advance for any replies!
Ciprian
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello Jordan, thank you for your reply.
I am sorry but I can not see or run your example, I don't use LabView, I use Visual C++ for developing.
Here is the code for generating the pulse train:
GeneratePulseTrain(unsigned long ulCount1, unsigned long ulCount2)
    short nStatus = 0;
    nStatus = DAQmxCreateTask("",&m_taskHandle);
    nStatus = DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanTicks (m_taskHandle, "Dev4/count5", "", NULL, DAQmx_Val_Low, 0.0, ulCount1,ulCount2);
    if( bTriggerMode == true) // if hardware trigger is enabled
       nStatus = DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (m_taskHandle, DAQmx_ArmStartTrig_Type, DAQmx_Val_DigEdge);
       nStatus = DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (m_taskHandle, DAQmx_DigEdge_ArmStartTrig_Edge, DAQmx_Val_Rising);
       nStatus = DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (m_taskHandle, DAQmx_DigEdge_ArmStartTrig_Src,"Dev4/PFI17" );
   //set the internal timebase
   nStatus = DAQmxSetCOCtrTimebaseSrc(m_taskHandle,"Dev4/count5","20MHzTimeBase" );
   nStatus = DAQmxStartTask(m_taskHandle);
    return nStatus;
And the code where I try to set the digital line:
SetChannelState(short nState)
    short nStatus = 0;
    uInt8 wrtBuf0[1]={0};
    nStatus = DAQmxCreateTask("",&m_taskHandle);
    // Configure line as output
    nStatus = DAQmxCreateDOChan (m_taskHandle, "Dev4/port0/line0", "", DAQmx_Val_ChanPerLine);
nStatus = DAQmxStartTask(m_taskHandle);
    wrtBuf0[0] = nState;
    nStatus =DAQmxWriteDigitalLines (m_taskHandle, 1, 0, 0, DAQmx_Val_GroupByScanNumber , wrtBuf0, NULL, NULL);
    nStatus = DAQmxWaitUntilTaskDone(m_taskHandle,10);
    nStatus = DAQmxStopTask(m_taskHandle);
    nStatus = DAQmxClearTask(m_taskHandle);
    m_taskHandle = 0;
    return nStatus;

Conceptual problem in using a PCI-6602?

Hi, All You Wild and Crazy NI/LabVIEW Types --
I have a problem that's been close to sending me off the deep end for more than a month now, and I think that I'm so enmeshed in it that I can't see the forest for the trees anymore. I'd like to apologize in advance for the length of this post, but there are some details that might or might not be important, and I'd rather make the mistake of giving you too much information than not enough.
We do impact-cratering experiments, using a gun to launch (usually) spherical projectiles at a variety of targets. One of our big efforts is to measure the velocities at which material is ejected from growing craters. We do that with a line-generating laser, oriented so the "sheet" of laser light is perpendicular to the target's surface and through the impact point; we strobe the laser at a programmed rate (with our PCI-6259 board) and take a time exposure of the scene with a Nikon D100 DSLR. When target material -- usually grains of sand -- is ejected, the laser illuminates a "slice" through the curtain of ejecta, illuminating a small portion of the fragments numerous times in their trajectories. Since we know the scale of the photograph and its orientation relative to the laser's illumination, and we also know the rate at which the laser is flashing, we can easily calculate the velocities of the illuminated particles. I'm attaching a picture (file 4044, cropped.jpg) of an example taken with an older camera to give you an idea. In the picture, the laser's illuminating the scene from the right of the frame and the projectile flew into the picture from the top of the frame, traveling along the left-hand edge. The brightest portion is the flash from the impact, and the rest of the parabolic trajectories are the grains of sand in flight. The target bucket, full of coarse sand, is the elliptical looking cylinder at the bottom of the picture. It's roughly 28 cm in outside diameter, if you'd like a scale.
As you might imagine, with our projectiles moving anywhere between 0.7 and 3 km/s, sequencing everything is pretty important. We're using (or trying to use) LabVIEW to do all of the sequencing, instrument control, and data storage. Things are going pretty well so far, except for what I'll describe in more detail below. A couple more things, though, first. It's important that we measure the projectile's speed in each shot, as that controls impact energy and momentum, which are critical to know in a given experiment. We do that with simple laser-photodetector pairs (which we normally call "velocity stations") arranged along the projectile's trajectory. As the projectile passes between a laser and its detector, its shadow is detected and a TTL pulse is sent to our PCI-6602 board. Depending on the experiment, we use three or four such laser-dector pairs. They use counters 0, 1, 2, and 3. We know the distances between the laser stations and, once we get the times between detections, it's s simple matter to calculate the projectile's velocity.
We also use LabVIEW to fire the gun, and we do that because opening the camera's shutter has to be synchronized with the firing pulse, which currently is sent via P1.1 on the 6259. Here's the problem: when we test the laser-detector arrays in a "standalone" mode (that is, without any other tasks or operations being done with LabVIEW), they work infallibly. It's when we try to use LabVIEW to fire the gun that we get either very erratic results from the velocity stations/6602 or no results at all.
I've tried a range of things, from starting the two-edge measurement task before the firing signal is sent, to trying to force things with a timed sequence, to doing things with brute force via a seuqence structure. When I try to start the two-edge measurement task first, though, the firing signal isn't sent until the counters time out. This of course, wrecks the experiment, because all of the timing is then messed up. The VI that I've attached (Version 1.vi) is a HIGHLY simplified version of the initial attempt I made at doing this, with all sorts of background stuff removed just so I can cut to the chase. (Only one two-edge measurement task is shown, for instance.) I think that the VI is pretty self-explanatory (and embarrassingly primitive), so it probably doesn't need much in the way of explanation. Counter 7 and PFI 0 on the 6602 are used to accept the signal from the firing button and trigger the event structure, which contains the two-edge separation and gun-firing tasks. (In reality, I use a separate VI to have three to four concurrent two-edge separation tasks running concurrently, one for each velocity station.) I start the two-edge separation tasks first so the detectors and counters are ready for the projectile. It's not necessary here, but I kept the 500 ms wait frame in this example because that's why the sequence structure exists -- to allow the shutter of the Nikon to open completely before the gun fires. After those 500 ms, the firing signal is sent to the circuit that actually fires the gun.
What happens in this configuration is that the second frame of the sequence structure doesn't execute until the 5-s timeout transpires in the two-edge separation task. I've also tried this using a line on the 6602 to fire the gun instead of P0.1 on the 6259, but that ends up with the same result. (Both counters are used on the 6259 to strobe the main illumination laser, so they're unavailable, if you're wondering. In any case, we need four counters for the four velocity stations.)
FINALLY, my question: What am I doing wrong, here? If I put the two-edge separation tasks in the same frame of the sequence structure as the firing task, the gun fires when it's supposed to, but we get no velocity measurements. I've also tried to force the timing with another version of a sequence structure; I'm attaching another very simplified version below as Fire and speed example.vi.
After you recover from your violent fits of laughter, I'd really appreciate hearing what you might recommend. (And no, surrender isn't an option.)
Thanks for taking all of your valuable time to read this huge post -- I really appreciate it!
Mark
Attachments:
4044, cropped.jpg ‏197 KB
Version 1.vi ‏35 KB
Fire and speed example.vi ‏30 KB

I agree with all 3 of Kevin's points. His first suggestion will probably fix your problem (see below). The 2nd and 3rd suggestion would improve efficiency and responsiveness, but #2 might not be possible since independently triggering four outputs in hardware would require the use of 4 counters (on the 6602 anyway) which might be busy doing other tasks in your application (although if you don't need the stations to trigger independently then you could implement this with a single counter).
I think I have an explanation of the problematic behavior you are seeing based off of the following bits of information from your post:
1. Running the small example code by itself works flawlessly, but adding other simultaneous functionality fails. You mentioned you are doing this on 4 stations, so I'm assuming 4 counter input tasks running in parallel.
2. The behavior you are seeing is that the 2nd sequence does not execute until after the read times out (note that the sequence is supposed to be executing in parallel with the read).
It sounds like the problem is coming from a combination of calling into DAQmx Read before data is available (this consumes one of the threads that LabVIEW has allocated to your application until DAQmx Read finishes executing) along with the fact that LabVIEW allocates 4 threads per execution system per priority by default. Since all of your threads (from what I can tell) are executing on the same priority, the 4 reads you are calling will block anything else from executing until they have completed. By then it's too late and the firing of your gun happens after the counter task has already timed out.
You *may* increase the number of threads allocated to your application by using a VI that is included with LabVIEW (vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi) and this would also probably remedy the behavior you are seeing. However, rather than throwing more threads at this application I think the better solution would be to change the sequencing of your tasks like Kevin suggested ("create and start the 2-edge task before entering the sequence structure, and defer the 2-edge *reading* until *after* firing the DO")--in doing this you would now expect to see data immediately upon calling DAQmx Read and you avoid the situation where Read is blocking indefinitely and consuming an application thread. You could take this a step further by checking the Available Samples per Channel property (or using the DAQmx EveryNSamplesAcquiredIntoBuffer event) to ensure that data is actually available before calling Read.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

NI PCI-6602: semi-period measurement stops unexpectedly or returns wrong values

Hi,
Using an NI PCI-6602 card we try to measure the semi-periods of a digital signal.
In "continuous sampling mode", 10 samples are collected in the buffer and then are read
out.
Up to 6 counters on this card are sampling the same signal in our testing configuration.
Here we found these issues:
1. Failure
In principle, the measurement runs correctly, but one or more counters sporadically may
suffer a complete failure. I.e. these counters don't provide samples anymore.
Only after stopping and restarting the assigned task, a failed counter works again.
Apparently, a counter failure is most likely to happen when
    - the sampled signal "changes", i.e. when the pulse width of the signal changes,
    - or when the computer load is high, e.g. when opening a window of another application.
Every counter occasionally failed, but the issue was found very often at counter 1 of
the PCI-6602 card, if we used counters 0 through 5 in parallel.
Using another PCI-6602 card, the failures happened preferably on counters labeled "near"
number 5.
2. Wrong values
Occasionally the "interpretation" of the sampled values changes, i.e. the length of the
"high level" period is returned, where the "low level" period length should be given, and
vice versa.
This is our task configuration:
Configuration done with MAX:
Signal input range:    2 usec - 2 sec
Custom Scaling:        None
Sample mode:        continuous
Buffer size:        10 Samples
In addition these calls are made:
ret = DAQmxSetDigEdgeArmStartTrigSrc( task->mHandle, <use the same terminal as is used for
the signal to be measured>);
ret = DAQmxSetArmStartTrigType( task->mHandle, DAQmx_Val_DigEdge);
ret = DAQmxSetDigEdgeArmStartTrigEdge( task->mHandle, DAQmx_Val_Rising);
ret = DAQmxSetCISemiPeriodStartingEdge( task->mHandle, <the channel>, DAQmx_Val_Falling);
Best regards
Manfred

Hi Manfred7,
did you already test this behaviour with a simple example from us?
Just go through the example database and try the examples there.
These examples should work.
If it works, there is a problem with your programm.
If it won't work, please tell me more about your software:
- Version
- DAQmx Version ,...
best regards
Dippi

Resistance measurement using PCI-6602

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for