RESTful schedule instance ID do not match with instance PID in CMC Instance details

SAP BO 4.1 sp1
I'm using the RESTful Web Service API to schedule a Webi report with the following API:
http://<server>:<port>/biprws/infostore/<documentId>/scheduleForms/now
In the response, I get the Location in order to retrieve the scheduled
resource's instance id (<instnceId>) and to use it to monitor the
resource's status, using the API:
http://<server>:<port>/biprws/raylight/v1/documents/<documentId>/schedules/<instanceId>
In the SAP Business Objects Central Management Console, I'm looking
for a
reference to this <instanceId>.
From the resource's history I found in the "View->Instance details"
section, a PID that doesn't correspond to the <instanceId> retrieved by
the API.
Why the 2 IDs don't match?
Thank you

Hi Riccardo,
The PID in the status details is not the SI_ID of the instance, but rather the Process ID of the AdaptiveJobServer that ran the job. This is a child process of the AdaptiveJobServer that is created run the schedule jobs. (you can see the Process ID of the java.exe process in Task manager). If the machine is under load, several child job servers can be created.
I'm not aware of any way to get the SI_ID of the instance in the CMC, but you can get the SI_CUID from the document link. This will match the CUID of the instance if you return its properties (or ../infostore/<documentId>/children ) using the Rest APIs
Dan

Similar Messages

Schedule Release shipmet QTY not matched with line QTY

the problem is when create schedule release and come to shipment lines and specific in QTY field which come by default from lines i found the QTY less than the line QTY for example i put in the lines (2400) each i found (37.1) and some times i found (.01)
when try to put QTY manual system say QTY should less the line QTY so i try make arround which is delete the header lines and save then re-enter the line agian then system work normally ....this issue repeated many times with all users and specially when create release 2 or 3 from the planned purchase order so we need to know how we can avoid this issue in the future

I do not understand the problem description.
How many lines / shipments / distributions in Planned PO? What is the quantity in each of them.
What is the quantity in Release Shipment / distribution?
What is the exact navigation user is trying what is the error being thrown?

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

Hi Expert,
              1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system:
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and
XMCEKET-REWRT).
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and
XMCEKET-WEWRT).
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and
of course this information in available.
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not
available because of the following reasons:
1 - System standard fields.
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.
2 - Performance
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and
not goods receipt.
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity
and values, then is natural that this information is only available
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice.
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that
have a long order history.
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry

F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

Hello All,
What is the reason for report F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
Please advice

Hello,
I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
dont implement.
If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
USE MASTER
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
END
CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
SESSION_ID INT
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
,START_TIME DATETIME
INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
SELECT
SESSION_ID
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
,START_TIME
FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
SELECT SESSION_ID
FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
EXECUTE (@CMD)
END
CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

Recovery scenario - Voting disk does not match with the cluster guid

Hi all,
Think of you can not start your guest VMs just because it has a corrupted system.img root image. And assume it contains 5 physical disk( which are all created by the RAC template) hence ASM on them.
What is the simplest recovery scneario of the guest vms (RAC)?
Can it be a feasible scenario for recover of the availablity? (Assume both of the RAC system images are corrupted and we prefer not a system level recovery rather than backup / restore)
1. Create 2 RAC instances using the same networking and hostname details as the ones that are corrupted. - Use 5 different new disks.
2 Shutdown the newly created instances. Drop the disks from the newly created instances using VM manager.
3. Add the old disks whose system image is failing to be recoverd but ASM disks are still in use (from the newly created instances using VM manager.) to the newly created instances.
4. Open the newly created instances
Can we expect the ASM and CRS could be initialized and be opened without a problem?
When I try this scenario I get the folllowing error from the cssd/crsd .
- Cluster guid 9112ddc0824fefd5ff2b7f9f7be8f048 found in voting disk does not match with the cluster guid a3eec66a2854ff0bffe784260856f92a obtained from the GPnP profile.
- Found 0 configured voting files but 1 voting files are required, terminating to ensure data integrity.
What could be the simplest way of recovery of a virtual machine that has healthy ASM disks but corrupted system image?
Thank you

Hi,
you have a similar problem, when trying to clone databases with 11.2.
The problem is that a cluster is uniquely identified, and this information is hold in the OCR and the Voting disks. So exactly these 2 are not to be cloned.
To achieve what you want, simply setup your system in that way, that you have a separate diskgroup for OCR and Voting (and ASM spfile), which is not to be restored in this case of szeanrio.
Only all database files in ASM will then be exchanged later.
Then what you want can be achieved.
However I am not sure that the RAC templates have the option to install OCR and Voting into a separated diskgroup.
Regards
Sebastian

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu Gupta

Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Inventory data not matching with R/3

Hi,
In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
1.What could be the reason?
2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
Pls help us with your suggestions.

We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
Pls help with your inputs.
Thanks
Soujanya

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
Yogini

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini

Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

Dear Gurus,
Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
Can U help me in this Regard.
Ur Responses are most appreciated.

Hey Pathak,
The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
Hope U got my Point.

GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
Arun

But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

Hi Experts,
My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
Original invoice document accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
Vendor account: Credited
during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
Vendor account : Debited
GR/IR Account : Credited
Consumption Account : Credited
Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
but while cancelling the GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
Kindly help in this regards
Regards
Mohan

Hi,
Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
Thanks & Regards,

RESTful schedule instance ID do not match with instance PID in CMC Instance details

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for