Schedule Release shipmet QTY not matched with line QTY

the problem is when create schedule release and come to shipment lines and specific in QTY field which come by default from lines i found the QTY less than the line QTY for example i put in the lines (2400) each i found (37.1) and some times i found (.01)
when try to put QTY manual system say QTY should less the line QTY so i try make arround which is delete the header lines and save then re-enter the line agian then system work normally ....this issue repeated many times with all users and specially when create release 2 or 3 from the planned purchase order so we need to know how we can avoid this issue in the future

I do not understand the problem description.
How many lines / shipments / distributions in Planned PO? What is the quantity in each of them.
What is the quantity in Release Shipment / distribution?
What is the exact navigation user is trying what is the error being thrown?

Similar Messages

RESTful schedule instance ID do not match with instance PID in CMC Instance details

SAP BO 4.1 sp1
I'm using the RESTful Web Service API to schedule a Webi report with the following API:
http://<server>:<port>/biprws/infostore/<documentId>/scheduleForms/now
In the response, I get the Location in order to retrieve the scheduled
resource's instance id (<instnceId>) and to use it to monitor the
resource's status, using the API:
http://<server>:<port>/biprws/raylight/v1/documents/<documentId>/schedules/<instanceId>
In the SAP Business Objects Central Management Console, I'm looking
for a
reference to this <instanceId>.
From the resource's history I found in the "View->Instance details"
section, a PID that doesn't correspond to the <instanceId> retrieved by
the API.
Why the 2 IDs don't match?
Thank you

Hi Riccardo,
The PID in the status details is not the SI_ID of the instance, but rather the Process ID of the AdaptiveJobServer that ran the job. This is a child process of the AdaptiveJobServer that is created run the schedule jobs. (you can see the Process ID of the java.exe process in Task manager). If the machine is under load, several child job servers can be created.
I'm not aware of any way to get the SI_ID of the instance in the CMC, but you can get the SI_CUID from the document link. This will match the CUID of the instance if you return its properties (or ../infostore/<documentId>/children ) using the Rest APIs
Dan

Why the doc total amount is not matched with the total item line amount?

Hi,
Recently when i try to update something in sales order via my add-on, i got an error said u201CThere is a difference between the document total and its components. [ORDR.DocTotal][line: 0] Iu201D Then i checked the sales order in SAP B1, I found the document total amount was not matched with the item line total amount. Actually the item line is quite simple, there is only one item line with qty 1. How comes the document total could be different with the amount from item line? I know the document total amount is a read-only field which is calculated automatically by SAP. This is really weird for us, we don't know how this happened.
Has anyone experienced similar situation like mine and how this happens?
Thanks,
Lan

I am having this same issue and I have additional information.
I am on ver. 8.8 PL 16.
Periodically (mulitiple times a week), when a Sales Order is created, the Doc Total amount is -zero- when there are clearly items that have a price associated with them. This causes an error when Adding the document. Sometimes, I can just change the quantity of one of the items, which forces the Doc Total to update. Most of the time this does not work, though. I end up having to restart the SAP client and then everything begins to work as it should.
This behavior is occuring on mulitple machines in our office.
Earlier in this thread, Rahul mentioned that they currency rounding was turned off and that this could be part of the problem. In fact, we were having issues with Currency Rounding and did turn it off not long ago. Rahul, can you explain better what you meant by "give the proper amount so that you can overcome the error..."
Randy Davis
Denver, CO
Edited by: Randy Davis on May 16, 2011 2:01 PM

Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu Gupta

Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta

Item does not match schdule line ( program error ) message no . V1427

*Item does not match schdule line ( program error ) message no . V1427 .* This is the message I am getting when I am trying to display a quotation through VA23 . From here system exits the transaction .
As per my observation , when I compared VBAP and VBEP tables, there are 2 items in VBEP table with schedule lines but the same items are not present in VBAP table. User says he tried to delete these items because there is no quanity , Inspite of that these items appear in VBEP table .
The document is a reservation document where in schedule line category does TOR and availability check.
I checked various related notes - 442831 , 401463 , 389687 etc . These are quite old notes and I am in release ECC 5.0 .
What is the best way as this doc has nearly 30 items and nearly all of them have quanity confirmed .
Please provide your valuble inputs ...
Regards
Raghav..

Nitin,
Below are the steps to check
Transaction SE18
Definition name: BADI_SD_SALES
Menu: Implementation -> Overview
double-click on implementation: IM_CORE_CHECK
Now you will get an overview on the methods.
check whether implementation IM_CORE_CHECK is active or not.
If not Press the change button and activate
looking at the your system pack level this should be active. If it is active then the inconsistency must be modified directly at database level through Z report.
Ramesh

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

The number of details is not matching with the total count.

Hi all, again stuck with the code.
There is a form where i have to populate all the details of few tables in excel & there is a report where i have to make count of all these details.
The problem here is the number of details that is populated in excel is not matching with the count in report, both have to match. There some problem in code, please help me in matching it.
The below is the 5 tables with the columns below.
Tables are ENQACEDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACMHDR, ENQACSPEC:
The Names mentioned below the table's name are Column Names:
ENQACEDTL
ENQACEHDR
ENQACMDTL
ENQACMHDR
ENQACSPEC
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENGREF
ENGREF
QTY
OFFREF
MINSL
ITEM
EPREPBY
ITEM
BRANCH
EINSL
FRAME
DEPT
RATING
DEPT
MTEMP
TECOLD
ENGREFTDT
ENCLIP
MKTREF
ETEMP
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL:
SELECT ENQACEDTL.ENQNO, ENQACEDTL.ENQAMDNO, ......... (....ALL COLUMNS)
FROM ENQACMHDR,ENQACMDTL,ENQACEHDR,ENQACEDTL,ENQACSPEC
WHERE
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREF=ENQACEDTL.ENGREF AND
ENQACMDTL.ITEM=ENQACEDTL.ITEM AND
ENQACMHDR.DEPT=:PROC_DEPT AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :FROMDATE AND :TODATE
ORDER BY ENQACMHDR.ENQNO,ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO;
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR COUNT OF DETAILS IN REPORT:
SELECT ALL ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.DEPT, COUNT(ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENQNO) COUNT
FROM ACENQ.ENQACEDTL, ACENQ.ENQACEHDR
WHERE (ACENQ.ENQACEDTL.ENGREF=ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENGREF)
AND ENQACEHDR.LOCKE=1 AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :P_STDATE AND :P_ENDDATE
GROUP BY ENQACEHDR.DEPT;
There is problem in join condition of 1st code that is in the "SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL":
Please help me to sort out this problem..
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle Forms & Reports Builder 6i.

As Karthick points out, we cannot help if we cannot see your correct table structures (create table statements) and some example data and expected output (insert statements would be helpful). You're telling us there's a problem, but we cannot see what the problem is as you've not shown it. Just saying your query is not working is like me telling you my car is not working, but not telling you what the symptoms are. You wouldn't know where to start in fixing it.
Why are you using Oracle 9.2.0.1 ? Not only has that version been unsupported for about a decade, but 9.2.0.7 was the first version of 9i that was considered 'stable' as versions prior to that were considered buggy. So you're using an old, unsupported and buggy version of oracle. Seriously, you need to consider upgrading to a supported version, preferably at least the latest 11g version.
And what has oracle Forms and Reports got to do with the issue?
And please explain how you are getting your data out of Excel and presenting it to Oracle to be able to query against it. Excel does not have "tables", so your question is completely unclear how you are querying the data from Excel.

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

Hi Experts,
My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
Original invoice document accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
Vendor account: Credited
during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
Vendor account : Debited
GR/IR Account : Credited
Consumption Account : Credited
Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
but while cancelling the GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
Kindly help in this regards
Regards
Mohan

Hi,
Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
Thanks & Regards,

Accounting doc entries not matching with the the entries from j_1ipart2 entries

Hi,
After creating PO, I have done MIGO and J1IEX. Now, posted MIRO. The end screen shows a number stating accounting document created.
I checked the accounting doc in fb03 and the document is displayed over there. I also checked the table for values captured in PART2 of excise. The value displayed in table is not matching with the value displayed in accounting document. Can anyone help?

Hello Tejas,
Here is the updated version of the situation.
After the transaction J1IEX, I got a message saying an 'Accounting Document' has been created. But the accounting document number does not match with the original values. I checked all the tables and found out that the accounting document is not created.
In this case, I thought of creating an accounting document manually and adding them directly to the table.
Here are my questions,
-Can I manually create an accounting document for multiple line items?
-Few tax values should be split and should go to 2 different GL accounts. so how to do this if I am creating it manually
-Or can I delete the values captured during 'J1IEX' in the table and reopen the GR so that the t-code j1iex can be processed again?

SCCM issue - "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

I have a problem with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number" recurring.
I am trying to install Acrobat XI Std silently by SCCM.
I've used the Adobe Customisation Wizard to create a mst which include the volume serial number we have with our licence purchases. Note that I am in Australia. I use the command line in SCCM for the install as "msiexec /i "AcroStan.msi" TRANSFORMS="D&B_AcroStd.mst" /qn" which fails silently. If I install on a local machine using an admin command prompt and changing to /qb at the end, I get the aforementioned error.
I have a few things to try and resolve, having searched the adobe forums and other forums for the solution. The mst is only trying to install US English & I have even gone so far as to use the direct editor in the customisation wizard and change some values in the property table to resolve this. In the property table I can confirm that LANG_SEL_DEFAULT = ENU, REGIONAL_LIST = ENU, LANG_LIST = en_US, ProductLanguage = 1033
Is there a way to check the language specified for ym serial number?
Bryndon

Update on a couple of details:
@Sabian,
Thanks for the location, I've downloaded and then when I tried an install of the newly extracted msi (admittedly on the same computer) I got exactly the same issue. Of note though is that running /qf automatically brought up the same serial number and the same incorrectly spelled company name. Installing on another computer (freshly imaged) doesn't have those inputs already present under /qf. Next when I try using the transfrom (a new one) with /qr it gives an error of the serial number, displaying the entire serial.
@Sebastian
I've had a look through yours and it seems our issues could have the same origin. Looks like I may have to call customer support regarding the serial number as Sabian suggested in your thread.
The bit that gets me is when the same serial number is used in a manual install (or /qf) then it installs ok without any errors.

PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

Hi Expert,
              1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system:
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and
XMCEKET-REWRT).
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and
XMCEKET-WEWRT).
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and
of course this information in available.
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not
available because of the following reasons:
1 - System standard fields.
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.
2 - Performance
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and
not goods receipt.
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity
and values, then is natural that this information is only available
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice.
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that
have a long order history.
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry

Setup.exe gives a "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

I ran the Adobe Customization Wizard XI to create a transform file and now when run setup.exe it always come with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number".
It does the same thing when using msi with the command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
Here is my setup.ini file
[Startup]
RequireOS=Windows XP
RequireMSI=3.1
RequireIE=7.0.0000.0
Require64BitVC10RT=1
CmdLine=/spb /rs /sl"1036"
[Product]
msi=AcroPro.msi
vcrtMsi=vc_red.msi
vcrtDir=VC10RT_x64
Languages=1033;1036
2052=Chinese Simplified
1028=Chinese Traditional
1029=Czech
1030=Danish
1043=Dutch (Netherlands)
1033=English (United States)
1035=Finnish
1036=French (France)
1031=German (Germany)
1038=Hungarian
1040=Italian (Italy)
1041=Japanese
1042=Korean
1044=Norwegian (Bokmal)
1045=Polish
1046=Portuguese (Brazil)
1049=Russian
1051=Slovak
1060=Slovenian
1034=Spanish (Traditional Sort)
1053=Swedish
1055=Turkish
1058=Ukrainian
1025=English with Arabic support
1037=English with Hebrew support
6156=French (Morocco)
CmdLine=TRANSFORMS="AcroPro.mst"
[Windows XP]
PlatformID=2
MajorVersion=5
MinorVersion=1
ServicePackMajor=3
[MSI Updater]
Path=WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
I don't know what goes wrong as took my serial number on my profile from the adobe web site, same thing for the download of the software.
Does it means that the serial number provided was invalid for deploying ?
NB.: My goal is to deploy our Acrobat XI through SCCM in silent mode and I don't know if there is extra consideration for that. For now it's only not working at the command line.
Another important point is that the install works great without customization ! If I just run the setup.exe from freshly extracted files and I use my serial number, everything is working fine.
So what goes wrong ?

Thanks for the reply brogers_1 and Vinod Dbhal, you gave good hint.
I retried installing the initial package in French on a Windows 7 English and the software installed properly in French.
As I used to work with virtuals for those tests, I rolled back my virtual and redo my test installation with chosing to install it in English on my Windows 7 English and again the installation finished properly but I was surprised when I realized that even if I chose English as language, the software was running in French !
Of course I can change the language settings (in the edit-preferences-language) to follow the operating system witch is nice.
That gave me the cue I needed to know. I started from scratch my customization with choosing only the French language in the "Application Languages" and I left the MUI Languages blank and saved the .mst
I ran again the same command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
And everything works fine.
NB.: As I used the .msi directly, of course I had to install the prerequirement Visual C++ 2010 first. Otherwise the installation failed without any error message.
Thanks again to you for your good hint,
Bob

Ed payable not matching with gl balances

ed payable, ed cess and sedcess not matching with gl accounts. what would be the reason.

Go to transaction FBL1N and leave the vendor number blank, run the balances for all the vendor line items.
You need to restrict the balances to the reconciliation account in the selection parameters.
This will show you all the balances in your Trade accounts payables in your balance sheet account.
Usually there might be several reconciliation account created in the balance sheet for different vendor categories, i.e. inter co vendor, trade vendors, employee expenses, subcontractors etc.
Please choose which account you want to reconcile to the vendor balances. Usually companies choose default A/P Rec account as 200000 and will proceed to build up rec accounts in this series. Review your reconciliation accounts in the vendor master and use this information in the FBL1N transaction. Hope this helps.
Best - S

Schedule Release shipmet QTY not matched with line QTY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for