Restrict EDI Transmission to the Vendor.

Hello Experts,
I have a question,
Can we restrict the PO changes being transmitted to the Vendor even though its setup as an EDI Vendor.
Scenario.
1. PO Gets Created.Its gets transmitted to the vendor through EDI.
2. Now the user changes somethng in the PO and changes are Transmitted again.
3. But if incase of my client there are numerous times changes are done and not always you want to send the ORDCHG Idoc to vendor.
Question:
1. Is there a functionality avialable to restrict the EDI from being transmitted to vendor even though its an EDI Vendor.
2. I know we can create a mapping of saying change only if certain key fields are changed but they wnt to generate the Idoc but restrict sending sometimes.
Means they can send those changes sometimes but sometimes not send.
Thanks,

HI,
1. once you have finished the mapping details with your external partner you have to send a "initial load" all masterdata needed for this vendor.
2. after that you can use the change pointer solution to send changes of an item to the externam partner.
how to do that:
1. you have to create a logical system (Tcode: SALE) for your external partner or converter system
2. maintain your IDoc Settings in the partnerprofiles (Tcode: WE20)
3. customize your distribution modell (Tcode: BD64)
4. customize ports / RFC Destinations as well (WE21 / SM59)
5. send Masterdata with Tcode: BD10
for the change pointers look at tcode:
1. SCDO.
2. activate CP at BD50
3. define CP at BD52.
4. send changed Masterdata: BD21
Regards,
Gordon

Similar Messages

Electronic PO Transmission to the vendor systems

I am new to PI , I have a scenario in which i have to send the PO document electronically to the supplier system in CXML format using XI interface and get the XML confirmation back from the supplier system and update the PO and once the confirmation is updated in th PO an email should be triggered to the respective person.

Hello,
Go to NACE
- Select EF and click on OUTPUT TYPES.
- Then select Output Type NEU and click on processing routines
- In that you have to add a new entry - medium 5
- Then you need to assign a program, form routine and form.
- You can use the standard program i.e. SAPFM06P, FORM routine is always ENTRY_NEU and standard MEDRUCK.
- Then in PARTNER FUNCTION you need to add a new entry: medium - 5 and function - VN
- For subject of the mail go to Mail Title and Texts. In title give PO No. &EKKO-EBELN &
- Under General data -> Replacement of text symbols give program as SAPMM06E and Form Routine as
TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
- Now the subject will be PO No. xxxxxxxxx.
- You need to maintain your email id in tcode SU01 and also the vendor's email id. - Now while creating a new purchase order change the medium to External Send
- Then go to Communication Method and select CS01 ALSO make sure that the Cover Page Text has value PO No. &EKKO-EBELN&
- Go to tcode ME9F
- Execute.
- Select the checkbox and click on Output Message.
- You will get a message MAII XXXXXXXXXXX generated
thanks,
santosh

Want to restrict the vendor at plant level

Hi Experts,
As per standard SAP, once the vendor is extended to comapny code then buyer can place order in any plant of same company code. My client wants to restrict the use of vendor at plant and after some business approval, will allow to use the vendor for specifc that plant. Could you please help me, how can I acheive this ?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Ajit

There is no solution for you in standard you have to develop something yourself.
It is even possible to create purchase orders before a company code view is created for a vendor master, hence it cannot be controlled via company code blocks. The block at company code will have an effect on goods receipt and invoice receipt, which is too late.
Purchasing blocks can only be set at purchasing organisation level. Even you can create a vendor with a plant level , it is not possible to set a block at this level. If this purchasing organisation serves many plants then a block will affect all plants.
only with a purchasing organization specific responsible for a single plant you can meet your requirement in standard with a procurement block at purchasing org level.

I encountered an error in the Payment Wizard screen as I was creating an Outgoing Payment for petty cash expenses. On the "Recommendation Report" screen, I clicked "Non-Included Trans." and saw that one of the vendors (Vendor Code: WILCO) has the followi

Hello,
I encountered an error in the Payment Wizard screen as I was creating an Outgoing Payment for petty cash expenses. On the “Recommendation Report” screen, I clicked “Non-Included Trans.” and saw that one of the vendors (Vendor Code: WILCO) has the following error:
“The document amount is greater than the max. amount allowed in the payment methods linked to the BP”
Upon checking, the “PCF-W” Payment Method linked to WILCO does not have any restrictions, nor does WILCO have any credit/commitment limit set. I have also appropriately defined the Dummy Business Partner Bank (under Payment Terms) as well as checked the “Included” box for PCF-W on the Payment Run-Payment Methods screen.
Could anyone please help me on this?
Salamat,
Cat

PS - have found other posts indicating that clips smaller than 2s or sometimes 5s, or "short files" can cause this. Modern style editing often uses short takes ! Good grief I cannot believe Apple. Well I deleted a half a dozen short sections and can export, but now of course the video is a ruined piiece of junk and I need to re-do the whole thing, the sound etc. which is basically taking as much time as the original. And each time I re-do it I risk again this lovely error -50 and again trying to figure out what thing bugs it via trial and error instead of a REASONABLE ERROR MESSAGE POINTING TO THE CLIP IT CAN'T PROCESS. What a mess. I HATE this iMovie application - full of BUGS BUGS BUGS which Apple will not fix obviously, since I had this product for a few years and see just hundreds of hits on Google about this error with disappointed users. Such junk I cannot believe I paid money for it and Apple does not support it with fixes !!!
If anyone knows of a GOOD reasonably priced video editing program NOT from APPLE I am still looking for suggestions. I want to do more video in future, but obviously NOT with iMovie !!!

EDI Transmission Issue!! Interface issue

Dear Experts,
I've been trying to connect with Client system for a couple of weeks now to debug and iron-out a possible issue we uncovered in our parallel EDI transmissions from our SAP system back on April 29th and 30th. The EDI Transmission is not happening. We're not able to establish the interface with the Warehouse Managment System. Please suggest some solutions.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
What systems are you trying to connect. ECC with SAP WMS(Decentral)?.....In this case you will have to look at the Distribution model between the systems. Are you using any Middleware?
Thanks
Vinod.

Could you restrict purchase orders based upon Vendor / Material Group?

Hey everyone - I've got a general "could this be done" kind of question.
We would like to add on to the vendor purchasing view to include "valid" material groups. This would then have what material groups could be purchased for which company code for that vendor. Then in the purchase order creation / modification we would like to be able to validate this purchase order against this vendor / company code / material group combination.
Obviously with enough custom code this could be done. My question is whether it could be done without out introducing too much custom code - how would you construct such a solution to this problem?
We are a SAP 4.7 shop.
Thanks!   Ken Little

>
Ken Little wrote:
> Hey everyone - I've got a general "could this be done" kind of question.
>
> We would like to add on to the vendor purchasing view to include "valid" material groups. This would then have what material groups could be purchased for which company code for that vendor. Then in the purchase order creation / modification we would like to be able to validate this purchase order against this vendor / company code / material group combination.
>
> Obviously with enough custom code this could be done. My question is whether it could be done without out introducing too much custom code - how would you construct such a solution to this problem?
>
> We are a SAP 4.7 shop.
>
> Thanks!   Ken Little
By include "valid" material groups i think it means you are introducing a new field or some value in already existing field in vendor master.
1) Now to restrict PO based upon material group a small custom code is needed.
    Use BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST....here write a code with help of your ABAP person that system will first select the
    LIFNR (vendor code) entered in the PO...then it will check the same LIFNR in LFM1 table...here it will check the material
    group in the customized field & if found that it is within the list of previous listed material group then it will allow to process
    further or otherwise give a customized error message.
or
2) Use the field Group in OMSF...here maintain a common group against the material groups you want to do the purchase cycle.Now ask your BASIS person to use this group in carry out a specific activity, the user must have authorization for the combination of the activity and the authorization group.
Regards,
Indranil

Checking EDI Transmission Status (850 PO Outbound)

Hi,
We have implemented the 850 outbound PO EDI transaction for our customer. We would like to explore the following options for further tracking of the EDI sent to the factory.
Background:
EDI extract is generated in Oracle Apps using 850 outbound transaction (PO). This EDI extract is sent to our supplier/factory where it is converted into a Sales Order. The EDI is transmitted to the factory using FTP mechanism.
Requirement:
We would like to know if there is any way in which the factory can send back a response to say Oracle Apps, that confirms that the EDI extract has reached it correctly. This is to ensure smoother transmission of the EDI to the factory.
If there has been a similar scenario, then please share your views/thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Nitin Jain

Hi
yes, we have Rosettanet Standard which fulfills your requirement.
You need to implement Rosettanet Standard using any Integration Tol (webMethods is best suited for Rosettanet).
I have been in a project of same kind, we developed for POO and POCO in the same way. Once the TP gets the data, and he will confirm us saying that whether he will manufacture or not....
Plz surf this website www.rosettanet.org

Cannot put in read-only the vendor screen - Authorization

Hi all,
I would like a role to display in read-only mode the vendor (business partner) screen (BBPMAININT).
I assigned the BBP_PD_VL and BBP_VEND authorization objects with the 'display' attributes but the user still has 'edit' rights on the vendor profile.
What am I missing?
Thanks for your inputs
chris

Hi
I am afraid, it's not possible to make read-only mode using SAP Roles (using PFCG transation and authorization values). BBPMAININT transaction is a Web transaction and is Intended for Edit/Change/Display in same transaction.. and hence cannot be controlled via Authorizations/ Roles.
<u>Anyways, try these pointers -></u>
Note 956723 BBPMAININT:Bus. partner display switches to maintenance mode
Note 825199 Restricting maintenance to own data for 'ext. employees'
How to change Field display name for bbpmainint internet service?
Re: Creation of business partners - entries of drop down box
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

SAP MM- Trying to send RFQ's to the vendors via email.

Hi Experts,
User is trying to send RFQs using Email address... But user is not able to do so....
Please guide how to start with...
Thanks,
Forum shah

Hi,
First of all U need to maintain an e-mail address in the vendor master data, then
define communication strategy (if not existing): SPRO > SAP Netweaver > Application Server > base setting > message control > communication strategy --> define one and assign communication method INT
Once done, define output message on RFQ with (particular values only specified):
Transmission method: 5
Partner function: VN
Communication strategy: as defined above
At the end go in SCOT transaction and make sure tahta node INT is active with proper info. Double click on SMTP and insert:
maximum time (30 minutes?)
node in use marked
MAIL host: ask syst admin
MAIL port: ask syst admin
Set internet: * --> to send e-mails to all domains (here U can filter)
From SCOT u should also create a job for sending e-mail periodically; normally the output message creates record in SOST transaction (cockpit about e-mails management) that can be processed manually or autho by job periodically,
SCOT setting can be found in SAP note 841883 and related.
I hope it helps,
Cheers,
Mik

Restricting PO creation to two vendors

There is a business requirement to restrict the Purchase Orders that a group of four users can create and change. They will only be allowed to create and change POs for two vendors.
My original thought was to add these two vendors to a purchasing group, and to create a security role that restricted the users to the Purchasing Group using Authorisation M_BEST_EKG.
However this is not how SAP works. ME21N does not check the Purchasing Group of the vendor, but the header organisation tab that contains the EKGRP field.
A consultant has suggested that the vendors could be part of their own Purchasing Organisation. However this is overkill to change the Enterprise structure for just a couple of vendors.
I am considering adding a user exit and coding a check of the authorisation object M_BEST_EKG.
Has anybody any suggestions?

Implemented ZME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for definition ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
Interface IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST of class ZCL_IM_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
added coding in CHECK
selected LFM1-EKGRP
then
check the user has authority for vendor with this purchasing group
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_BEST_EKG' for user sy-uname
                    ID     'ACTVT' FIELD '01'
                    ID     'EKGRP' FIELD ls_lfm1-ekgrp.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
      Message E004(ZGEN) with poheader-lifnr sy-uname.
      ch_failed = 'X'.
      return.
endif.
Hope this helps others

Error while transporting the Vendor in MM-SUS

HI
We are implementing SRM server 5.5 and follow a MM-sus scenario.
We were able to transport the vendor to SUS via BD14.
but now we are reciveing an error -
An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_BUPA:060 -Error while trying to create contact person. Inform system administration Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText>
</standard>
</nr1:StandardMessageFault>
Can some throw light on this error.
Previously when we transffered the vendor to SUS an user
was getting created in su01 which is not getting created.
2 When a vendor is transffered it creates a contact person "DO Not USE" why it that so ???
regards,
Nimish Sheth

Hi,
Did you see the note 807812?
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for helpful answers.

How to post Credit Note to the vendor for purchasing of an Asset last year

Hi Mates,
The scenario is as follows:
-Asset purchased for Rs. 10000 in Fiscal year 2006.
-The said asset is depreciating every month since aquisitioned as it happens.
-Now in current fiscal year 2007, due to some reason, we want to debit the vendor.
-I tried thru t_code ABGF for the same but getting an error '' Net book value negative in area 15''.
-The concerned depreciation areas / Depreciation keys are 01( Book Depreciation ), 15 ( Tax Depreciation and 30 ( Group currency depreciation ) / Z001 ( 33% Straight Line to the day ), ZT03 ( Tax Write Off @ 0% ) and Z001 ( 33% Straight Line to the day ) respectively.
As on this date the depreciated asset value is Rs. 25829 ( Net book value for Book depreciation ), Rs. Nil ( Net book value for Tax balance sheet ) and Rs. 25829 ( Net book value for group currency ).
Even if i try thru T_code F-02 a simple JV, I am getting the same error i.e. '' Net book value negative in area 15''.
Waiting for your fast reply.
Rgds,
BABA

Hi Paul,
Can you please ellaborate your answer in detail. As you said I can click on Depreciation button in ABGF and can have a look at the depreciation value and fill the depreciation amount as well if needed. But when I click the depreciation button, the system gives the error 'Net book value negative in area 15'.
Waiting for an early reply as I am facing this issue in PRD.
Rgds,

Iterating through bseg line items and picking the vendor line item

Hello,
I am creating a report in which i want to show the list of vendors (with their WHT's). The output will be based on selection of a certain period(range). I guess i have to first iterate through BKPF and get those documents that lie in the given range, then i 'll have to iterate through the selected documents in BSEG and pick out the vendor line items (KOART = 'S'). Will i be using GET for this..
Is this the right way? secondly, if yes, can sumone show me how to iterate through BKPF and BSEG and get vendor details.?
Thanks..
SHehryar

Hey,
Instead of selecting data from BKPF-BSEG you could use BKPF-BSIK-BSAK.
BSIK and BSAK have the same details as BSEG and are use by SAP for reporting purposes.
Similarly for customer the table are BSID, BSAD and for GL the tables are BSIS and BSAS.
BSIK will have the open items and BSAK will have the cleared items.
-Kiran

Profit Center population in the Vendor and Customer Line items

hello
our client is asking for getting profit center in the vendor and customer line items where in the view FBL5n and fbl1n we are not getting the profit center populated - in the new gl i understand that there is a standard report based on the gl account.
but our business is not satisfied with the report and expecting report at profit center level.
Can any one suggest any way of doing this.
regards,
Vijay

Dear Vijay,
Let me provide you my view of solutioning for this. This is an enahcement that needs to be done
1. You can get the profit center from the given vendor and customer line item at the time of posting, using an enahcement you will be able to capture it.
2. Existing the profit center field is not populated in the BSIK,BSAK,BSID and BSAD tables
3. Hence, in the same enhancement once you capture the profit center , you can write the code that profit center is updated in these tables also.
4. This will help you to do the vendor line item wise selection in the FBL1N, FBL5N profit center wise.
Constraints of this solution:
The only constraint remains where in the for a given document if there are multiple profit center, then the system will do the splitting profit center wise for a vendor line item, which will not populate the profit center in those tables as there is only one field available in the bsid etc.. tables.
This basically would be the one the soltuion where in as seeen from the end user ther eis no change in the front end interface , the way they are doing always they can do.
You need to also take care the % of document splitting means cross profit center postings /cross document splitting charactericstics postings and the volume involved in this. so that you can suggest this to your client.
Regards,
Bharathi.

Designing the vendor report

Hi Friends,
Pls guide me how to develop the vendor ageing report.
In my query i have key figures 0creditamount , 0debitamount characteristics 0vendor,0companycode,no of days( current date - net due date ).
In my report i have to shown ageing buckets in different columns like 0-7 days,8-30 days,31-60 days,61-180 days,181-365 days,> 365 days.
ex:
vendor 0-7 days 8-30 days
1000 $600(creditamount) $1000(creditamount )
Please tell me how to develop?
Thanks & Regards,
Ramnaresh.P.

Hi,
as Simon mentioned, there is a lot of information available about aging reports. Please search for your information first.
happy posting by following the rules.
Siggi

Restrict EDI Transmission to the Vendor.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for