Results Analysis splitting POCS (Revenue Surplus)

I am not able to split POCS between two different GL Accounts.  I am able to do it with VLRV with two different Line ID's; but can't do it with POCS.
On OKG2 Revenue surplus (POCS) is defined with cost element 982133.
On OKG4 I split revenue by the following
COArea  Vsn RAKEY (RVD) (E)  982284    " Revenue Domestic
COArea  Vsn RAKEY (RVI) (E)  982285     " Revenue International
On OKG5 I define the split of revenue accounts to RVD & RVI.
Account 311*** = RVD
Account 315*** = RVI
On OKG8 I am able to split VLRV to different accounts using cost element 982284 & 982285.  I do not know how to define a split of POCS because it used the cost element 982133 from OKG2 and was not defined by my split in OKG4.
My KKAI / KO88 Settlement works to split VLRV, but POCS goes to the same account.
How can I split POCS value between two different accounts based on if the revenue was international or domestic (same as my split I used for VLRV)?

Hi,
RA categories POCS (Revenue surplus) is updated with an RA technical cost element customized in OKG2, not that from OKG4. As a result, when you specify in OKG8 a cost element different from that in OKG2, nothing is selected from settlement.
If you need to distribute such RA categories as POCS between the RA lind IDs to post to different G/L accounts, you can use the solution of the Note 38070. Please, read this Note carefully.
POCI and POCS is undated on the database under the respective RA technical cost elements defined in the definition of the RA version (transaction OKG2). The matter is that POCI and POCS cannot be distributed to RA line IDs in standard and, therefore, the customizing in OKG4 is not relevant for these RA categories. You have, however, the following workarounds.
1. Use the user exit 4 (see the note 67793). In this case you    can assign two different technical RA cost elements for two different   RA keys and, consequently, two different FI posting rules (OKG8) to   settle to different G/L accounts for projects and internal orders.
2. Use of the user exit 1 with the coding from the attached note 38070.   With this workaround POCI is updated as WIP on RA line IDs W00,   W=1, ... and POCS is updated as the reserves for unrealized costs   (RUCR) on these RA line IDs under the respective RA cost elements   defined in OKG4 for line IDs W00. W01....
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

  • Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

    Hi,
    We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
    project stock and cost based POC RA method.
    Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
    statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
    Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
    for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
    616960, 616869 and 78420.
    In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
    project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
    H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
    correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
    616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
    Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
    OKG4.
    The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
    correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
    During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
    inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
    at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
    be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
    the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
    costs on settlement.
    In our example, Statistical actual
    posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
    Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
    revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
    happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
    along with COS of USD 57150.
    Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
    along with revenue recognised?
    Thanks,
    BK

    Hi Bijay,
    We are in a similar situation in one project.  Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
    Regards,
    Gireesh

  • Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

    Dear Gurus,
    I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
    We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
    We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
    Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
    billing through Settlement.
    I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
    Thanks,
    Viswas Anantharangachar

    Hi,
    In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
    Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
    Enjoy SAP….
    Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
    Namskar,
    Ketan Dave

  • Result Analysis and POC in PS

    Hello All,
    I need to know whether there is direct relationship between POC and RA? Is it necessary to maintain all the config settings for POC if I want to do RA for a Project ? or can RA be done independently of POC?
    Thanks in advance
    Sarang

    RA cannot be done with out POC
    POC is an essential requirement to calculate the accruals and deferrals
    There are various RA methods which basically calculate the POC
    eg
    Cost based -> POC = act cost/ plan cost
    Rev based -> POC = act rev/ plan rev
    Statistical -> POC can be entered manaully using statistical key figures
    Progress Analysis -> POC is based on value from Progress Analysis - you need to set this up if you are using Progress analysis
    So basically you can do RA without Progress Analysis to calculate POC. The determination of this depends on your company's financial policies and regulatory requirements in the country you are operating

  • Result Analysis for TECO status - all values are 0

    Dear guru,
    I've done the configuration for Result Analysis with POC method 03, for project.
    There are 4 relevant status: PREL, REL, FNBL and TECO. TECO is mark as final RA.
    PREL, REL, FNBL are ok, but I face problem with TECO.
    In project I plan cost, plan revenue, and post actual cost through production order. There is no actual revenue.
    However, when I set the status to TECO and run Result Analysis, all the value: plan cost, plan revenue, actual cost,... are 0.
    I confuse why it is happen. Please help me.

    And another point, actual cost can be see in report, but in RA the actual cost is 0, for also other status.
    When I post actual cost through F-02, it is ok. But in this case actual cost is posted to project through confirming production order and receipt material.

  • Quantity base POC method of result analysis

    hello all,
    We are trying to create the result analysis key with quantity based POC method for Projects. we are choosing the Profit basis as E,K,M but we are getting the error ' Profit basis is only used for sales order.
    Can anybody help resolving the issue?
    Regards,
    sudhir

    RamSiva,
    I see that you've got the calculated COGS equal to the actual cost.  I would have thought that for quantity based POC the calculated cost should be equal to POC x C(p).  So if that's the case, I think the postings should be as follows:
    Debit Revenue for 36,000
    Credit Reserve for Revenue surplus for 36,000
    Since I don't know what the planned cost were I don't know what the correct signs are for COGS adjustment;
    Debit / Credit (Expense)
    Debit / Credit (Capitalized cost or reserve for unrealized cost, depending on the sign)
    If R(a) less than R(c) then:
    Credit Revenue
    Debit Revenue in excessive of billings
    thanks,

  • What is RESULT ANALYSIS,REVENUE RECOGNITION in PS

    hi gurus
    can any one explains me abt revenue recoginition and result analysis in Project Systems
    thx
    regards
    mahesh

    RA cannot be done with out POC
    POC is an essential requirement to calculate the accruals and deferrals
    There are various RA methods which basically calculate the POC
    eg
    Cost based -> POC = act cost/ plan cost
    Rev based -> POC = act rev/ plan rev
    Statistical -> POC can be entered manaully using statistical key figures
    Progress Analysis -> POC is based on value from Progress Analysis - you need to set this up if you are using Progress analysis
    So basically you can do RA without Progress Analysis to calculate POC. The determination of this depends on your company's financial policies and regulatory requirements in the country you are operating

  • Result Analysis - Profit Percentage based on Revenue

    Deare Gurus,
    While executing Result Analysis, we see profit percentage on the right side as percentage onthe basis of costs. We would like to view such detail as a percentage of revenue
    eg: standard
    Revenue - 100
    Costs - 80
    Profit - 20
    Profit percentage = 20/80 = 25%
    We want it to be 20/100 = 20%.
    Please help!!!!

    Hi Babu,
    I think your example is not totally clear. From what I understand, you need to calculate a result in percentage based on the result of two other columns. What you can do is to use the first result (from the two columns) as a CKF. And then, to this CKF, use the result calcultation options of the query desinger for percentage.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Diego

  • Result Analysis method 03 Cost Proportional POC

    Hi,
    I am going to use Result analysi 03 Cost Proportional POC. Please guide me how the accounting entries will
    flow in  this method and formulas for this method.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srilakshmi

    Hi,
    In your RA key definition, in column, Valuation...
    change valuation basis to J - Cumulative Actual Costs, Cumulative Actual Revenues

  • Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

    Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

    Could be one of these possibilities:
    1) Controlling Area set is wrong
    2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
    3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
    You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
    Assign Points if useful....

  • Revenue is not visible within results analysis

    Hi Experts,
    Am SD consultant , am not ware of about KKAK transaction and can you please throw ur ideas on below issue.
    In Tcode- KKAK Actual result analysis for the sales order , revenue is not visable with in result analysis for sales order.
    Can you please give your suggestion how can it get update tehre.
    And also let me know this KkAK transaction details can see after creation of billing document or before billing document creation

    The show interface command should give you a lot of details on the link usage.
    You could watch the load, 5 minute input rate/output rate fields before compression and after compression to find
    the realistic usage.
    I am pasting a sample show interface output below
    Router#sh int s0
    Serial0 is up, line protocol is up
    Hardware is HD64570
    Internet address is 192.168.100.2/24
    MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
    Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec)
    Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
    Last clearing of "show interface" counters 13:32:47
    Input queue: 1/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0
    Queueing strategy: weighted fair
    Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
    Conversations 0/2/256 (active/max active/max total)
    Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
    5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec
    5 minute output rate 2000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec
    98631 packets input, 8680095 bytes, 0 no buffer
    Received 30857 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
    2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
    98332 packets output, 8924943 bytes, 0 underruns
    0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
    0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
    0 carrier transitions
    DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up

  • Update Result Analysis not allow for category E(Revenue)

    Hi,
    While defining update for Result Analysis for Sales Order Costing - Controlling Area -  RA Version - RA Key for WIP in Sales ORder - Line ID as Revenue - and category E(Revenue), put Secondary GL against  Cost/Revenue in tcode OKG4, system shows message as :
    Use only categories "A", "K", and "N" in WIP calculation
    Message no. KQ115
    Diagnosis
    In the valuation method, you chose WIP calculation as the results analysis type.
    Procedure
    For WIP calculation, you can only update costs ( category K), settled costs (category A), and costs not to be included (category N [revenue], for example).
    As a result while doing WIP on Sales order in tcode KKA3 system shows message as "No update of line IDs specified in CO area 0810 version 0 RA key 000004" in message no KJ208.
    Here RA KEY 000004 is used for WIP on Sales Order. We have defined 4 line ids which are assigned with RA Key for WIP on Actual Cost against category  K (Cost) for 3 line ids and 1 line is used with category A (Settled cost). Same way for RA key Sales Order I have to mention against category E (Revenue). But system does not allow me.
    Best Regards,
    Samat Roy

    Hi Dadoni,
    In OKG3 (Valuation Method) there are two different RA Keys I have maintained. RA Key 000002(WIP of Actual Cost) which is used with production order and RA Key 000004(Result Analysis for Sales Order) is maintained with Sales Order. Both the RA Keys have common status which are REL, DLV, PREL and TECO. Is it correct or wrong staus for Sales Order WIP ? Here status number area 1> PREL, 2> REL, 3> DLV and 4> TECO.
    Kindly tell me for RA Key 000004(WIP on Sales Order) you have mentioned only 3 status which are REL, TECO and FNBL. Is it necessary to maintained more status for Sales order WIP. What will be its status number and inside parameter setting from RA Type to other indicator setting ?
    Best Regards,
    Samrat

  • Revenue Recognition Functionality through Result Analysis (RA) key

    Hi all,
    We have a requirement for Revenue recognition, Can anyone guide me Revenue recognition functionality through Result Analysis (RA) key  and functions of RA Key .
    Regards,
    Lal Maheswararao

    Hi Makrand,
    Thank you for your Valuable reply. Actually I am looking Specifically for the Revenue Recognition functionality in Cloud computing Business Scenarios. Like the income has to be recognized over the period of time on the basis of service provided. And it should calculate Percentage of completion for calculating revenues and Cost and how much profit it has to be recognised over the period.
    These functions will possible through Result Analysis method. but i have very limited knowledge about RA method.
    Can you please explain in general how Result analysis method will work and if possible with necessary configuration.
    Regards,
    Lal Maheswararao

  • Revenue Recognition Accounting in PS Results Analysis

    I am trying to understand certain aspects in the accountng involved for the process of Results Anaysis. In my case, we have configured RA for revenue recognition and all is working well. We have a project that has a billing element and an account assignment element under it.  Invoices go to the billing element, costs go to the aa elemet. RA key is entered on the billing element. RA calculates Revenues and COS and the billing element settles them to PA. While calculated, defered and unbilled revenue post to FI using OKG8 configuration settings. All is fine on the mechanics of this.
    What I do not understand is the treatment for the actual costs. Are they supposed to be settled to PA as well? If so...then, the costs seem to double up in PA (COS from RA calculated based on the actual costs via the billing element and Actual costs themselves from from the aa element). Are the actual costs supposed to remain in the aa WBS element and not be settled? It seems unbalanced. Can anyone explain?

    Hi,
    Settlement process involves a sender object and a receiver object. Receiver object is the cost object on which actual cost incurred in the sender object is settled. RA is one of the receiver objects for settlement, but not the only one.
    Your scenario seems to be periodic calculation of WIP (result analysis) and final settlement of production orders.
    The periodic WIP (RA) postings done in FI are reversed and replaced with COGM when the production order is finally delivered. The entries in FI at this stage is based on the "Standard Price" maintained in the material master (depending on the valuation variant). Then the final settlement of production order takes place and the total actual cost is arrived at. The difference in cost between "actual cost" and standard price" is settled to RA as a separate entry.
    The reversal of entries when the production is delivered (as explained above) ensures that cost is not reckoned twice.
    Hope this explanation meets your requirement.
    If so, you may like to close the thread. Otherwise, please revert.
    Muraleedharan.R

  • Technical Result Analysis Cost element - OKG2

    Hi,
    Need some inputs on Techincal Result analysis cost element(Whats the purpose and its use)
    How is it different from those which we assign in Line ids.
    Thanks & Regards,

    Cost element created for the following internal purposes:
    For calculating work in process ( WIP calculation)
    For results analysis
    Work in Process
    When work in process is calculated, the following data is updated under this cost element:
    Valuated actual costs
    Calculated costs
    For the calculation of work in process, the valuated actual costs and the calculated costs are only used for internal purposes and do not require separate cost elements. All that is needed is a technical results analysis cost element.
    Results Analysis
    In results analysis, the following results analysis data is updated under this cost element:
    Valuated actual costs
    Calculated costs
    Capitalized profit
    Calculated revenue
    Revenue in excess of billings
    Revenue surplus
    Reserves for imminent loss
    Creation of reserve
    Usage of reserve
    Value adjustment
    Results analysis data calculated by the
    POC method such as:
    POC Profit increase
    POC Profit decrease
    POC Loss creation
    POC Loss cancellation
    POC Loss realization
    Other cost elements
    Valuated actual costs for complaints and commissions
    Variances in variance calculation for collective orders
    The results analysis cost element for the results analysis data is only for internal purposes, so you don't need to create a separate cost element for each piece of results analysis data. You only need a technical results analysis cost element.

Maybe you are looking for

  • NEW GL: profit center allocation cross company codes possible?

    F-Hi, In PCA the allocations are postes by company code - also the tracing factors are calculated by company code. In NEW GL, can the profit center allocation (transaction FAGLGA11) be done cross company, including the calculation of the tracing fact

  • Move iphoto pics to photo when library on external drive

    Now that iphoto has changed to Photos, Im not sure how to import by library. First of all, I had my iphot library stored on a separate external drive due to size. Apparently leaving the Photos library on an external drive does not allow you to share

  • Odd Crashes in flash.

    OK. Here's the story. I'm an amateur flash developer and i'm working on a project involving 3 scenes. Scene 1 = "Hall, Scene 2 = "Kitchen" and Scene 3 = "Garage". All is well and good. However, whenever i try to change the scene to "Kitchen" the enti

  • Photoshop CS5 problems

    I have a MacBook Pro 15.4 inch laptop.  When I use the HDR function I cannot see the bottom of the window.  When I click on the minimize and maximize button it does not show me the bottom of the window.  All I see are the top of the images that are b

  • Disappearing movies

    I bought three films on my iphone. When i connected the iphone to my computer it copied two of the films to my itunes but the third has disappeared from my iphone and my computer. The other two films are still on both devices though. Why has it gone?