Retrieving only one row where the date is the greatest.
Hello;
I have a table of received orders, sometimes each order has multiple receipts due to back-orders and thus several rows for each purchase order receipt. All of the values in the table are identical except for the ReceivedDate field.
I need to only get the row that has the latest ReceivedDate so I can ascertain whether the shipment has been received on-time or if it is late. For example, if I have a promised date from my vendor of 2015-01-31 for 50 widgets. I receive 40 widgets on 2015-01-29
another 5 on 2015-01-31 and the last 5 on 2015-02-01, the entire shipment is considered to be late because I got my last widgets past the promised date.
In my report, I don't care about the quantity received, I only care about when they were received Vs the promised date.
So how can I only get the row that has the latest date (2015-02-01 in my example) so that I can do my on-time comparison?
Appreciate any and all help.
Thanks Ron...
Hi, assuming to work in AdentureWorks db you can execute this script
use AdventureWorks2012
go
select
CustomerId,
orderdate,
max(orderdate) over (partition by CustomerId) as maxOrderDateForCustomer
from sales.SalesOrderHeader
to search all the order for each CustomerId and compare the date of each order with tha max date of all customer's orders.
Hope this will help you
Best regards
Questo post è fornito "così com'è". Non conferisce garanzie o diritti di alcun tipo. Ricorda di usare la funzione "segna come risposta" per i post che ti hanno aiutato a risolvere il problema e "deseleziona come risposta" quando
le risposte segnate non sono effettivamente utili. Questo è particolarmente utile per altri utenti che leggono il thread, alla ricerca di soluzioni a problemi similari. ENG: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
Similar Messages
-
Condition that takes only one row with the maximum cost of the maximum date
I have to the following query
SELECT distinct b.segment1 ||'.'|| b.segment2 as ITEM,
so.vendor_site_id as SUPPLIER,
'VE' as ORIGIN_COUNTRY_ID,
replace(round(l.mto_costo_neto/l.can_unidades_empaque,2),',','.') as UNIT_COST,
5 as lead_time,
null as pickup_lead_time,
l.can_unidades_empaque as supp_pack_size,
1 as inner_pack_size,
'C' as round_lvl,
50 as ROUND_TO_INNER_PCT,
50 as ROUND_TO_CASE_PCT,
50 as ROUND_TO_LAYER_PCT,
50 as ROUND_TO_PALLET_PCT,
null as MIN_ORDER_QTY,
null as MAX_ORDER_QTY,
'FLAT' as PACKING_METHOD,
'N' as PRIMARY_SUPP_IND,
'Y' as PRIMARY_COUNTRY_IND,
case when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%KG%' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%Kg%' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%UND%' then 'EA'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Kilogramo' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Litro' then 'L'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Unidad' then 'EA'
else null
end as DEFAULT_UOP,
1 as TI,
1 as HI,
null as SUPP_HIER_TYPE_1,
null as SUPP_HIER_LVL_1,
null as SUPP_HIER_TYPE_2,
null as SUPP_HIER_LVL_2,
null as SUPP_HIER_TYPE_3,
null as SUPP_HIER_LVL_3,
null as CREATE_DATETIME,
null as LAST_UPDATE_DATETIME,
null as LAST_UPDATE_ID,
case when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%KG%' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%Kg%' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure like '%UND%' then 'EA'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Kilogramo' then 'KG'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Litro' then 'L'
when b.primary_unit_of_measure = 'Unidad' then 'EA'
else null
end as COST_UOM,
null as TOLERANCE_TYPE,
null as MAX_TOLERANCE,
null as MIN_TOLERANCE
FROM mrp.mrp_sr_assignments sr , MRP.MRP_SR_RECEIPT_ORG ro , MRP.MRP_SR_SOURCE_ORG so,
inv.mtl_system_items_b b, lcm.cmp_lineas_cotizacion l
WHERE sr.SOURCING_RULE_ID = ro.SOURCING_RULE_ID
and ro.SR_RECEIPT_ID = so.SR_RECEIPT_ID
and sr.inventory_item_id in ((select inventory_item_id from TMP.VIVERES_VEGETALES)
UNION ALL
(select inventory_item_id from TMP.GENERICOS)
UNION ALL
(select inventory_item_id from TMP.HIJOS_GENERICOS))
and sr.inventory_item_id = b.inventory_item_id
and b.organization_id = 136
and sr.inventory_item_id = l.cod_producto_idI need to agregate the following condition
For example, The following query
SELECT l2.fec_ini_vigencia_costo, l2.mto_costo_neto, l2.can_unidades_empaque, l2.cod_producto,
REPLACE(ROUND(l2.mto_costo_neto/l2.can_unidades_empaque,2),',','.') costo_unidad
from cmp_lineas_cotizacion l2
order by cod_producto, fec_ini_vigencia_costo desc, mto_costo_neto descgenerate
FEC_INI_VIGENCIA_COSTO MTO_COSTO_NETO CAN_UNIDADES_EMPAQUE COD_PRODUCTO COSTO_UNIDAD
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88 -- THIS ONE
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
18/05/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
04/05/2009 245.82 12 1.1000008 20.49
13/04/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
23/03/2009 373.2072 12 1.1000008 31.1
23/03/2009 373.2072 12 1.1000008 31.1I need to take only one row with the maximum FEC_INI_VIGENCIA with the maximum COSTO_UNIDAD of the table lcm.cmp_lineas_cotizacion l, which is calculated with the formula ROUND(l2.mto_costo_neto/l2.can_unidades_empaque,2)A better example
I need only one row the maximum COSTO_UNIDAD for the maximum FEC_INI_VIGENCIA for every cod_producto_id in the table lcm.cmp_lineas_cotizacion
I need to take these values
FEC_INI_VIGENCIA_COSTO MTO_COSTO_NETO CAN_UNIDADES_EMPAQUE COD_PRODUCTO_ID COSTO_UNIDAD
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88 -- THIS!
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
18/05/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
04/05/2009 245.82 12 1.1000008 20.49
13/04/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
17/06/2010 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
17/06/2010 371.0832 12 1.1000008 30.92
18/05/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
04/05/2009 245.82 12 1.1000008 20.49
13/04/2009 382.56 12 1.1000008 31.88
27/10/2010 1171.549344 12 1.1000009 97.63 -- THIS!
13/10/2010 1171.549344 12 1.1000009 97.63
06/09/2010 1171.549344 12 1.1000009 97.63
02/08/2010 1048.825056 12 1.1000009 87.4
28/07/2010 754.8 12 1.1000009 62.9
27/07/2010 614.04 12 1.1000009 51.17
21/06/2010 954.84 12 1.1000009 79.57
27/05/2010 614.04 12 1.1000009 51.17
07/07/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26
28/03/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26
27/10/2008 1744.644672 12 1.1000010 145.39
01/07/2008 1690.12224 12 1.1000010 140.84
07/07/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26 --THIS!
28/03/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26
27/10/2008 1744.644672 12 1.1000010 145.39
01/07/2008 1690.12224 12 1.1000010 140.84
07/07/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26
28/03/2009 1143.17 12 1.1000010 95.26
27/10/2008 1744.644672 12 1.1000010 145.39
01/07/2008 1690.12224 12 1.1000010 140.84 -
How to remove only one row from the database using labview6.1
using labview 6.1 I create a table with various rows and columns and store bulk of data's in them.,, what procedure should I follow to remove only one paticular row from the database? Help me out with an example please,,
Thanking you in advance!Hi,
If you have the database toolkit you can delete a row using just a SQL Query to "DB Tools Execute Query.VI"
Example:
DELETE FROM Table name Where SerialNum='Value' And Date='Value' And Time='Value'
See also attached VI
Best Regards
Johan
Attachments:
Delete_a_row_in_a_database_table.vi 48 KB -
Pick only one row from the repeated rows
Oracle 10g r2 (10.2.0.5)
I have a query/view, which returns the the reords as follows
set colsep ||
Name || Address || Zip
abc123 || Ln1 || 123456
bcd123 || Ln2 || NULL
bcd123 || Null || 45678
efg123 || Ln0 || 96345
efg123 || Ln0123 || Null
efg123 || adr || null
the result set I need from the above is
set colsep ||
Name || Address || Zip
abc123 || Ln1 || 123456
bcd123 || Ln2 || NULL
efg123 || Ln0 || 96345
As you see that the first record on each repeated row sets are required
Thanks,Hi,
Using the aggregate FIRST (or LAST) function like that, there's no guarantee that all of the output values on the same row will come from the same row in the original table. To do that, you can use the analytic ROW_NUMBER function, like this:
WITH got_r_num AS
SELECT name, address, zip, ...
, ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY name
ORDER BY address
, zip
) AS r_num
FROM table_x
SELECT name, address, zip, ...
FROM got_r_num
WHERE r_num = 1
;This assumes the "first" row is the one with the first address (in alphabetic order), and, in the event of a tie, the one with the lowest zip (however "lowest" is defined for zip). You can specify any order you want in the analytic ORDER BY clause.
I hope that answers your question.
If not, what is your question? Use words other than those you've already used to describe what you want to do.
Explain exactly what "first" means in this problem.Point out where the query above (or the one posted by Claytonian, if that seems closer) is getting the wrong results, and explain how you'd get the right results in those places.
If necessary, post new sample data (either CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, or a WITH clause, as Claytonian did) and the results you want from that data. -
Issue with Selection Listener when the table has only one row
Hi All ,
I have developed a table in which I am using Selection Listener to perform some task when any row is selected.
It is working fine when I have more than 1 row in the table, but when I have only one row in the table , the selection listener do not call the corresponding method in bean.
I understand that selection event will be raised only when the row is changed, but in the use case when only one row is there, what should be done to make the selection listener work ?
In the selection listener I have written code to make the selected row as current row , and perform the required task.
Please suggest a way out for this situation.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
try removing this attr from table
selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.xxx_VO1.collectionModel.selectedRow}" -
Selecting only one row at a time
Hi experts,
i have following doubt regarding selecting rows from a db:
Is there any way of selecting only one row AT A TIME from a dabase just to collect the data in rows instead of in a unique document containing all the rows?
I would like you to ellaborate on this as i need to send only one row to the IE, and then other row, and so on... without throwing any error!
I have seen that there are SELECT SINGLE and SELECT UP TO 1 ROW, but these two methods are only useful when retrieving only one row, and that does not match my requirements. I need to process all the rows but one by one..
I know that we can use the receiver jdbc adapter as if it was a sender by means of its specific datatype, but how to do it row by row??
Hope i had explained well..
Thanks in advance and best regards,
DavidHi kiran,
Yes, my table has 5 not null fields but i am selecting and updating fixes values so i think that I will definetely go for the next solution:
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE status='0' and ROWNUM<2;
UPDATE t1 SET status='1' WHERE status='0' and ROWNUM<2;
My only concern is if the update will take the same row that the select.... BTW, I think it will
..What do you guys think?
I ve been trying to operate with your proposed queries but i received some errors. Your queries are very interesting but i think that with the above ones i meet my requirements as the status field will be 0 for not processed rows and 1 for precessed ones (and the update will look for the row that meets the same 'where' clause than the select, and then, and only then, it will set status='1').
The only thing i have to care about is what i questioned before.
Thanks a lot and best regards,
David -
I can select only one row in my table why?
hi.. i have just started cold fusion. i am trying to connect
my database. its ok. but i can see only one row? why?
ff4.cfm =>
<cfquery name = "myFirstSelect" datasource="calisma">
select * from fuat1
</cfquery>
ff5.cfm =>
<cfinclude template="ff4.cfm">
<table>
<cfoutput query="myFirstSelect">
<tr height="20" onMouseOver="this.bgColor='#colorlist#';"
onMouseOut="this.bgColor='#colorrow#';" bgcolor="#colorrow#">
<td>AD</td>
<td>SOYAD</td>
<td>NUMBER</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20" onMouseOver="this.bgColor='#colorlist#';"
onMouseOut="this.bgColor='#colorrow#';" bgcolor="#colorrow#">
<td>#AD#</td>
<td>#SOYAD#</td>
<td>#NUMBER#</td>
</tr>
</table>
</cfoutput>
i can retrieve only one row. Cannot access the second row of
table. What can I do? What can I reach the second row?
thankxok i solve this problem thanx
-
Am I the only one with a dispatch date 19th July?
I did order on 19th June anyone else waiting this long?
I went to the Apple Store on launch day and bought my iPhone 4. No reservation, just went in and bought it. Much easier than pre-ordering. Enjoy the iPhone when you get it. iPhone 4 is excellent.
Oh to answer your question, it's unlikely you are the only one with a specific date. If Apple were allocating one iPhone per pre order per day, the backlog would take until iPhone 26 to get through. -
One to many to return only one row
hi guys,
i have an urgent problem here. i have a sql statement like below;
SELECT ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTMFRP0, ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTMFRP1,
ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTMFRF0, ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTMFRF1,
To_Char(TRN_HDR_DBF.M_OPT_FLWFST,'YYYYMMDD') AS VALDATE, ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTFXC02,
ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTFXC12, TRN_HDR_DBF.M_BRW_NOMU1, TRN_HDR_DBF.M_BRW_NOMU2,
ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTAMC02, ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TP_RTAMC12,
(CASE WHEN PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_LEG = 0 AND '20100831' BETWEEN To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE0,'YYYYMMDD') AND To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE1,'YYYYMMDD') THEN To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE1,'YYYYMMDD') END) AS RCV_DATE,
(CASE WHEN PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_LEG = 1 AND '20100831' BETWEEN To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE0,'YYYYMMDD') AND To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE1,'YYYYMMDD') THEN To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE1,'YYYYMMDD') END) AS PAY_DATE
FROM ALM_SWAP2_REP, TRN_HDR_DBF, PAY_FLOW_DBF WHERE ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_REF_DATA = 456576
AND ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_NB = TRN_HDR_DBF.M_NB
AND ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_NB = PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_TRN_ID
AND ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_NB = 228128
AND '20100831' BETWEEN To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE0,'YYYYMMDD') AND To_Char(PAY_FLOW_DBF.M_CALC_DATE1,'YYYYMMDD')
ORDER BY ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_TRN_GRP, ALM_SWAP2_REP.M_NB
When I join few tables, the results are returned in two rows because I have two records that in table PAY_FLOW_DBF that matches one row in table ALM_SWAP2_REP. I need these two matches but I want it to be returned in only one row without using group by. Pls help me. Thanklsuser9274041 wrote:
i have an urgent problem here.http://www.oracle.com/html/terms.html
>
4. Use of Community Services
Community Services are provided as a convenience to users and Oracle is not obligated to provide any technical support for, or participate in, Community Services. While Community Services may include information regarding Oracle products and services, including information from Oracle employees, they are not an official customer support channel for Oracle.
You may use Community Services subject to the following: (a) Community Services may be used solely for your personal, informational, noncommercial purposes; (b) Content provided on or through Community Services may not be redistributed; and (c) personal data about other users may not be stored or collected except where expressly authorized by Oracle
>
Could you explain how something that is for your personal, informational, noncommercial purposes can be urgent?
Or is this a violation of the terms of use and abuse of these forums? -
I am getting only one record from table data
Hi Experts,
I am using interacive forms to bring the table data i used GET_STATIC_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE
method. initially the table is empty when i fill some records more than one it is giving me only one record.
where as i fill the table in wddoinit more than one record and try to retreived it, showing all the records more than one. waht is the reason.. if i fill manually why it is not bringing all the reocrds.
i have used the cardinatly as follows
1. parent node(no tables/structure used)
Dictionary structure empty not used
Cardinality 1..1
Selection 0..1
Initialization Lead Selection Checked
Singleton Not checked
Supply Function not used
2. table node(i used table type)
Dictionary structure SFLIGHT_LIGHT
Cardinality 1..n
Selection 0..n
Initialization Lead Selection Checked
Singleton Not checked
Supply Function not used
Pleae help me out...
Thanks,
Mahesh.Gattuhi,
Use the following code for making the rows editable for a table UI element.
DATA lo_nd_cn_try TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node.
DATA lo_el_cn_try TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
DATA ls_cn_try TYPE wd_this->element_cn_try.
DATA ls_cn_try1 TYPE wd_this->elements_cn_try.
navigate from <CONTEXT> to <CN_TRY> via lead selection
lo_nd_cn_try = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_cn_try ).
do 5 times.
clear ls_cn_try.
append ls_cn_try to ls_cn_try1.
lo_nd_cn_try->bind_table( ls_cn_try1 ).
enddo.
-> cn_try is the node which is binded with the Table UI element.
What all this is called as initialization of table. This code will make 5 rows editable, If u want more rows editable then run the loop according to the requirement.
U can write this code in the WDDOINIT.
Thanks,
Pankaj Aggarwal. -
Select event not triggered in table with only one row
Hi all,
I am building a BI VC application where query data is displayed in a table. When the user clicks on a table row another query is then triggered and output in a second table. The output from table 1 is linked to the input of query2/table2 with a select event.
The problem that I am facing is that if there is only one row in table 1, the select event is never triggered. If, however there are two or more rows in the table the select event is triggered and query 2 is executed. I have searched the forums but all I could find on select event problems was how to avoid the initial select event.
Has anyone else experienced this issue and what is the workaround or is this a bug in Visual Composer? We are on VC 7.0 SP19.
Cheers,
Astein MelandThanks Chittya,
Yes we have considered this option as well. But as we have more than one table linked together we would like to avoid having to manually click several buttons.
In the end I found Note 1364334 describing bugfixes released in VC 7.0 SP20:
"Normally, when a Visual Composer table is populated from a data service, the first row is selected by default. However, we have found that if only one data row is returned from the data service, this row is not selected by default and cannot be manually selected by clicking on it either."
So I think we will just have to upgrade our Portal to the latest support packs to solve this problem.
Thanks,
Astein -
Oracle database link to MySQL select only one row
Hello,
I have created a connection from the Oracle batabase 11.2 to a MySQL database via database link. The following statement shows, that 35 rows are in the mySQL table:
SQL> select count(*) from "main_pages"@MOREWEB;
COUNT(*)
35
But a normal select statement only return 1 row.
SQL> select "subject" from "main_pages"@MOREWEB;
subject
Übersicht: Referenzen
I am using the mysql-connector-odbc-3.51.30-winx64 driver. A newer version cann't be installed because on Windows Server 2008 R2 I get an error with an missing dll-file. The DataDirect-ODBC-driver is not possible, because we like to use the free MySQL-database an DataDirect only support the enterprise edition.
I also have tried to limit the HS_OPEN_CURSORS or dont limit the HS_FDS_FETCH_ROWS, but there is no difference in the result. I always get only one row.
HS Init.ora
# This is a sample agent init file that contains the HS parameters that are
# needed for the Database Gateway for ODBC
# HS init parameters
HS_FDS_CONNECT_INFO = moreweb
HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL = ON
HS_FDS_FETCH_ROWS=1
# Environment variables required for the non-Oracle system
#set <envvar>=<value>
HS tracefile
Oracle Corporation --- MITTWOCH NOV 05 2014 13:56:22.066
Heterogeneous Agent Release
11.2.0.1.0
Oracle Corporation --- MITTWOCH NOV 05 2014 13:56:22.066
Version 11.2.0.1.0
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL" returned "ON"
HOSGIP for "HS_OPEN_CURSORS" returned "50"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_FETCH_ROWS" returned "1"
HOSGIP for "HS_LONG_PIECE_TRANSFER_SIZE" returned "65536"
HOSGIP for "HS_NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTER" returned ".,"
HOSGIP for "HS_KEEP_REMOTE_COLUMN_SIZE" returned "OFF"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_DELAYED_OPEN" returned "TRUE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_WORKAROUNDS" returned "0"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_MBCS_TO_GRAPHIC" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_GRAPHIC_TO_MBCS" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_RECOVERY_ACCOUNT" returned "RECOVER"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TRANSACTION_LOG" returned "HS_TRANSACTION_LOG"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TIMESTAMP_MAPPING" returned "DATE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_DATE_MAPPING" returned "DATE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_CHARACTER_SEMANTICS" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_MAP_NCHAR" returned "TRUE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_RESULTSET_SUPPORT" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_RSET_RETURN_ROWCOUNT" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_PROC_IS_FUNC" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_REPORT_REAL_AS_DOUBLE" returned "FALSE"
using mpgw as default value for "HS_FDS_DEFAULT_OWNER"
HOSGIP for "HS_SQL_HANDLE_STMT_REUSE" returned "FALSE"
SQL text from hgopars, id=1, len=36 ...
00: 53454C45 43542043 4F554E54 282A2920 [SELECT COUNT(*) ]
10: 46524F4D 20606D61 696E5F70 61676573 [FROM `main_pages]
20: 60204131 [` A1]
Deferred open until first fetch.
Performing delayed open.
SQL text from hgopars, id=1, len=40 ...
00: 53454C45 43542041 312E6073 75626A65 [SELECT A1.`subje]
10: 63746020 46524F4D 20606D61 696E5F70 [ct` FROM `main_p]
20: 61676573 60204131 [ages` A1]
Deferred open until first fetch.
Performing delayed open.
Please can help me someone.
Thanks.
Biancamxallen wrote:
Bianca,
If you log directly into MySQL and issue the same query (select "subject" from "main_pages";) what data is returned?
I looks to me that you count is the number of rows in the entire table "main_pages"
while you select is for the data in the "subject" column only.
This seems to indicate that you have just one row in that subject column.
Regards,
Matt
WHAATT?
What do you mean by "just one row in that subject column"?
That makes no sense at all. A row is a row. A column is a part of a row. All rows have all columns, though not all columns of all rows will necessarily have an assigned value. Lacking a WHERE clause to filter rows, any SELECT should return all rows. -
Get rows where the last row finish off
Hi, i have two tables AND would LIKE TO get data BY combining both.
here IS my data
WITH hist AS
SELECT To_Date('4/23/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias, 'PROC' dom FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('4/27/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias, 'LON' dom FROM dual UNION all
SELECT To_Date('4/1/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 111 alias, 'SOC' dom FROM dual UNION all
SELECT To_Date('4/10/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 111 alias, 'NAO' dom FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('3/23/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 222 alias, 'PSE' dom FROM dual
final AS
SELECT To_Date('2/26/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('4/22/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias FROM dual UNION all
SELECT To_Date('4/26/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('4/30/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 999 alias FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('2/25/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 111 alias FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('2/26/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 222 alias FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT To_Date('4/22/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 222 alias FROM dual UNION all
SELECT To_Date('4/26/2010','mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 222 alias FROM dual
the output should be as follow(without the extra blank line of course)
DT ALIAS DOM
2/26/2010 999 PROC
4/22/2010 999 PROC
4/26/2010 999 LON
4/30/2010 999 LON
4/27/2010 999 LON
4/23/2010 999 PROC
2/25/2010 111 SOC
4/1/2010 222 SOC
4/10/2010 222 NAO
2/26/2010 222 PSE
4/22/2010 222 PSE
4/26/2010 222 PSEso what i am doing here is as follow, take one row in hist table (4/23) and join with final table and give me all rows in final table
where dt <= to the row in hist table and include the row from hist table.
this logic will give me rows 2/26/2010,4/22/10 4/23/2010
then the second row in hist table (4/27/2010) wiill get all rows
in final table that is <= to the current row and pick up the rows starting from the row > than the last row where the 4/23/2010 finished off
in this case the output will be 4/26/10, 4/27/2010(we need to include row from hist)
since there is no row in hist that is greater than 4/30/2010, this date will still be display and dom column value should be taking from the max date in hist
which is 4/27/2010. see output above
this sound a little confusing to explain but look at output of what to expect as output. the other ids should follow the same logic
can someone help write a query for this? thanksHi,
Devx wrote:
Frank, thanks again, i ran the query in oracle 11g and oracle 9i. 11g runs ok but 9i doesnt. it looks like the ignore null option is not supported in 9i. That's right: IGNORE NULLS was new in Oracle 10. You should always mention your Oracle version whenever you ask a quiestion, especially if it's as old as Oracle 9.
i will be running this query in 9i. is there any alternative to re-write this query without using last value since ignore null is not supported and the output is not as i expected when i take that keyword out.
i really appreciate your help. please let me know how would i re-write the query. thanksOne work-around is to use LEAD or LAG instead of LAST_VALUE. This means you have to know exactly where (how many rows away) the most recent non-NULL value is, which in turn requires other analytuic funtions, such as ROW_NUMBER, and more sub-queries:
WITH combined_tables AS
SELECT dt, alias, NVL (dom, '_?_') AS dom FROM hist
UNION
SELECT dt, alias, NULL AS dom FROM final
, got_r_num AS
SELECT dt, alias, dom
, ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
ORDER BY dt
) AS r_num
, COUNT (*) OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
) AS alias_cnt
FROM combined_tables
, got_skip_cnts AS
SELECT dt, alias, dom, r_num
, r_num - MAX (CASE WHEN dom IS NOT NULL THEN r_num END)
OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
ORDER BY r_num
) AS skip_before
, MIN (CASE WHEN dom IS NOT NULL THEN r_num END)
OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
ORDER BY r_num DESC
) - r_num AS skip_after
FROM got_r_num
, got_next_dom AS
SELECT dt, alias, dom, r_num, skip_before
, LEAD (dom, skip_after) OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
ORDER BY r_num
) AS next_dom
FROM got_skip_cnts
SELECT dt
, alias
, NULLIF ( COALESCE ( next_dom
, LAG (dom, skip_before) OVER ( PARTITION BY alias
ORDER BY r_num
) AS dom
FROM got_next_dom
ORDER BY alias
, dt
;You should be able to calculate bot LEAD and LAG in the same query, but there seems to be a bug that only calculates one of them correctly in this case. The sub-query got_next_dom gets around that, by doing the LEAD in a separate sub-query. -
Merge only one row out of multiple rows
I need to prepare a merge statement which merge only one row in to a table. Below is the table definition, sample data and merge statement i used.
CREATE TABLE Mob_Attr (NAME VARCHAR2(20), ATTR_1 VARCHAR2(20), ATTR_2 VARCHAR2(20), ATTR_3 VARCHAR2(20));
CREATE TABLE Mob_Desc (NAME VARCHAR2(50), ATTR_1 VARCHAR2(20), ID NUMBER(20));
CREATE TABLE Mob_Main (NAME VARCHAR2(20), ATTR VARCHAR2(20), ID VARCHAR2(10));
insert into Mob_Attr(name, attr_1, attr_2,attr_3) values ('n1','aa',null,null);
insert into Mob_Attr(name, attr_1, attr_2,attr_3) values ('n2','bb',null,null);
insert into Mob_Attr(name, attr_1, attr_2,attr_3) values ('n3','cc',null,null);
insert into Mob_Attr(name, attr_1, attr_2,attr_3) values ('n4','dd',null,null);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n1','aa',10);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n1','aa',15);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n1','aa',123);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n1','aa',1455);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n2','bb',455);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n2','bb',135);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n3','cc',15);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n3','cc',52);
insert into Mob_Desc (NAME,ATTR_1,ID) values ('n4','dd',1455);
merge into Mob_Main ma using
(select d.name, d.attr_1,d.id from Mob_Attr a, Mob_Desc d
where a.name = d.name and a.attr_1 = d.attr_1
) q on (ma.name=q.name and ma.attr=q.attr_1)
when not matched then
insert (NAME,ATTR,ID)
values (q.name,q.attr_1,q.ID);
Above merge statement will actually merge entire data . But i want the first row will only get inserted to the base table (Mob_Main). If we take name 'n1' first row from table Mob_Desc with ID as '10' only should get inserted. I can go for a cursor to do this as i have huge data volume i prefer merge instead.MERGE INTO Mob_Main ma
USING (SELECT d.name, d.attr_1, d.id
FROM Mob_Attr a, Mob_Desc d
WHERE a.name = d.name AND a.attr_1 = d.attr_1 AND id = 10
UNION
SELECT d.name, d.attr_1, d.id
FROM Mob_Attr a, Mob_Desc d
WHERE a.name = d.name AND a.attr_1 = d.attr_1 AND id != 10
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1
FROM Mob_Desc d1
WHERE d.name = d1.name
AND d.attr_1 = d1.attr_1
AND d1.id = 10)) q
ON (ma.name = q.name AND ma.attr = q.attr_1)
WHEN NOT MATCHED
THEN
INSERT (NAME, ATTR, ID)
VALUES (q.name, q.attr_1, q.ID);
COMMIT;
select *
from Mob_Main
order by name, id;
NAME ATTR ID
n1 aa 10
n2 bb 135
n2 bb 455
n3 cc 15
n3 cc 52
n4 dd 1455
6 rows selected. -
SQL Server 2012 Undetected Deadlock in a table with only one row
We have migrated our SQL 2000 Enterprise Database to SQL 2012 Enterprise few days ago.
This is our main database, so most of the applications access it.
The day after the migration, when users started to run tasks, the database access started to experiment a total failure.
That is, all processes in the SQL 2k12 database were in lock with each other. This is a commom case of deadlock, but the Database Engine was unable to detect it.
After some research, we found that the applications were trying to access a very simple table with only one row. This table has a number that is restarted every day and is used to number all the transactions made against the system. So, client
applications start a new transaction, get the current number, increment it by one and commit the transaction.
The only solution we found was to kill all user processes in SQL Server every time this situation occurs (no more than 5 minutes when all clients are accessing the database).
No client application was changed in this migration and this process was working very well for the last 10 years.
The problem is that SQL 2k12 is unable to handle this situation compared to SQL 2k.
It seems to occurs with other tables too, but as this is an "entry table" the problem occurs with it first.
I have searched internet and some suggest some workarounds like using table hints to completely lock the table at the begining of the transaction, but it can't be used to other tables.
Does anyone have heard this to be a problem with SQL 2k12? Is there any fixes to make SQL 2k12 as good as SQL 2k?First off re: "Unfortunatelly, this can't be used in production environment as exclusive table lock would serialize the accesses to tables and there will be other tables that will suffer with this problem."
This is incorrect.
Using a table to generate sequence numbers like this is a bad idea exactly because the access must be serialized. Since you can't switch to a SEQUENCE object, which is the correct solution, the _entire goal_ of this exercise to find a way to properly
serialize access to this table. Using exclusive locking will not be necessary for all the tables; just for the single-row table used for generating sequence values with a cursor.
I converted the sample program to VB.NET:
Public Class Form1
Private mbCancel As Boolean = False
Private Sub Button1_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim soConn As ADODB.Connection
Dim soRst As ADODB.Recordset
Dim sdData As Date
Dim slValue As Long
Dim slDelay As Long
'create database vbtest
'go
' CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ControlNumTest](
' [UltData] [datetime] NOT NULL,
' [UltNum] [int] NOT NULL,
' CONSTRAINT [PK_CorreioNumTeste] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
' [UltData] Asc
' )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
' ) ON [PRIMARY]
mbCancel = False
Do
' Configure the Connection object
soConn = New ADODB.Connection
With soConn
.ConnectionString = "Provider=SQLNCLI11;Initial Catalog=vbtest;Data Source=localhost;trusted_connection=yes"
.IsolationLevel = ADODB.IsolationLevelEnum.adXactCursorStability
.Mode = ADODB.ConnectModeEnum.adModeReadWrite
.CursorLocation = ADODB.CursorLocationEnum.adUseServer
.Open()
End With
' Start a new transaction
Call soConn.BeginTrans()
' Configure the RecordSet object
soRst = New ADODB.Recordset
With soRst
.ActiveConnection = soConn
.CursorLocation = ADODB.CursorLocationEnum.adUseServer
.CursorType = ADODB.CursorTypeEnum.adOpenForwardOnly
.LockType = ADODB.LockTypeEnum.adLockPessimistic
.Open("SELECT * FROM dbo.ControlNumTest")
End With
With soRst
sdData = .Fields!UltData.Value ' Read the last Date (LOCK INFO 1: See comments bello
slValue = .Fields!UltNum.Value ' Read the last Number
If sdData <> Date.Now.Date Then ' Date has changed?
sdData = Date.Now.Date
slValue = 1 ' Restart number
End If
.Fields!UltData.Value = sdData ' Update data
.Fields!UltNum.Value = slValue + 1 ' Next number
End With
Call soRst.Update()
Call soRst.Close()
' Ends the transaction
Call soConn.CommitTrans()
Call soConn.Close()
soRst = Nothing
soConn = Nothing
txtUltNum.Text = slValue + 1 ' Display the last number
Application.DoEvents()
slDelay = Int(((Rnd * 250) + 100) / 100) * 100
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(slDelay)
Loop While mbCancel = False
If mbCancel = True Then
Call MsgBox("The test was canceled")
End If
Exit Sub
End Sub
Private Sub Button2_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click
mbCancel = True
End Sub
End Class
And created the table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ControlNumTest](
[UltData] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[UltNum] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_CorreioNumTeste] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[UltData] Asc
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = on, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
go insert into ControlNumTest values (cast(getdate()as date),1)
Then ran 3 copies of the program and generated the deadlock:
<deadlock>
<victim-list>
<victimProcess id="processf27b1498" />
</victim-list>
<process-list>
<process id="processf27b1498" taskpriority="0" logused="0" waitresource="KEY: 35:72057594039042048 (a01df6b954ad)" waittime="1970" ownerId="3181" transactionname="implicit_transaction" lasttranstarted="2014-02-14T15:49:31.263" XDES="0xf04da3a8" lockMode="X" schedulerid="4" kpid="9700" status="suspended" spid="51" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2014-02-14T15:49:31.267" lastbatchcompleted="2014-02-14T15:49:31.267" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.267" clientapp="vbt" hostname="DBROWNE2" hostpid="21152" loginname="NORTHAMERICA\dbrowne" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="3181" currentdb="35" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128058">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="adhoc" line="1" stmtstart="80" sqlhandle="0x020000008376181f3ad0ea908fe9d8593f2e3ced9882f5c90000000000000000000000000000000000000000">
UPDATE [dbo].[ControlNumTest] SET [UltData]=@Param000004,[UltNum]=@Param000005 </frame>
<frame procname="unknown" line="1" sqlhandle="0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000">
unknown </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
(@Param000004 datetime,@Param000005 int)UPDATE [dbo].[ControlNumTest] SET [UltData]=@Param000004,[UltNum]=@Param000005 </inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="processf6ac9498" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="KEY: 35:72057594039042048 (a01df6b954ad)" waittime="1971" schedulerid="5" kpid="30516" status="suspended" spid="55" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="1" lastbatchstarted="2014-02-14T15:49:31.267" lastbatchcompleted="2014-02-14T15:49:31.267" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.267" clientapp="vbt" hostname="DBROWNE2" hostpid="27852" loginname="NORTHAMERICA\dbrowne" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="3182" currentdb="35" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671156256" clientoption2="128058">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="adhoc" line="1" sqlhandle="0x020000003c6309232ab0edbe0a7790a816a09c4c5ac6f43c0000000000000000000000000000000000000000">
FETCH API_CURSOR0000000000000001 </frame>
<frame procname="unknown" line="1" sqlhandle="0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000">
unknown </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
FETCH API_CURSOR0000000000000001 </inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<keylock hobtid="72057594039042048" dbid="35" objectname="vbtest.dbo.ControlNumTest" indexname="PK_CorreioNumTeste" id="lockff6e6c80" mode="U" associatedObjectId="72057594039042048">
<owner-list>
<owner id="processf6ac9498" mode="S" />
<owner id="processf6ac9498" mode="U" requestType="wait" />
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="processf27b1498" mode="X" requestType="convert" />
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
<keylock hobtid="72057594039042048" dbid="35" objectname="vbtest.dbo.ControlNumTest" indexname="PK_CorreioNumTeste" id="lockff6e6c80" mode="U" associatedObjectId="72057594039042048">
<owner-list>
<owner id="processf27b1498" mode="U" />
<owner id="processf27b1498" mode="U" />
<owner id="processf27b1498" mode="X" requestType="convert" />
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="processf6ac9498" mode="U" requestType="wait" />
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
It's the S lock that comes from the cursor read that's the villian here. U locks are compatible with S locks, so one session gets a U lock and another gets an S lock. But then the session with an S needs a U, and the session with a U needs an
X. Deadlock.
I'm not sure what kind of locks were taken by this cursor code on SQL 2000, but on SQL 2012, this code is absolutely broken and should deadlock.
The right way to fix this code is to add (UPDLOCK,SERIALIZABLE) to the cursor
.Open("SELECT * FROM dbo.ControlNumTest with (updlock,serializable)")
So each session reads the table with a restrictive lock, and you don't mix S, U and X locks in this transaction. This resolves the deadlock, but requires a code change.
I tried several things that didn't require a code, which did not resolve the deadlock;
1) setting ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS=OFF ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS=OFF
2) SERIALIZABLE isolation level
3) Switching OleDB providers from SQLOLEDB to SQLNCLI11
Then I replaced the table with a view containing a lock hint:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ControlNumTest_t](
[UltData] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[UltNum] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_CorreioNumTeste] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[UltData] Asc
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = on, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
go
create view ControlNumTest as
select * from ControlNumTest_t with (tablockx)
Which, at least in my limited testing, resovlved the deadlock without any client code change.
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/
Maybe you are looking for
-
Error while retrieving data from sql using jdbc adapter
hi all, i m working on one scenario where i m sending data using HTTP and receiver is jdbc adapter which is retrieving me data from sql server. i have checked the structure both for req and res. i m getting this error <SAP:Error> <SAP:Category>Applic
-
How to upload many documents in a KM folder in 1 go??
Hello All, Im working on EP6 SP9. I an doing an experiment wherein I have a query: I have created a repository in KM. Now I want to upload documents from a folder on my PC. Different ways this can be done: 1. FileServer. 2. <i>This is what I have don
-
My Blackberry Device got wet in Salt Water, How to extract the data from its Memory ?
I have forgotten my device in my pocket while swimming in Sea Water. Eventually , the device got water damaged , I've taken out the battery, used the hair drier and still didn't work. All My concern is how can I retrieve the data on my Device Memory.
-
Anyone know about Mac VPN's?
I am trying to connect my windows pc to my mac vpn and it connects okay, but the web page doesn't load. Anyone have any clue what to do?
-
Oracle Data Warehouse DB and OLAP_OBIEE DB [OBIEE11g]
Hi Experts, I have a problem regarding joining the 2 DB in an Analysis report. The scenario is this: Oracle Data Warehouse is DB_1 and OLAP_OBIEE is DB_2 DB_1 -col1 -col2 DB_2 -col3 In Analysis report when they are queried or run separately, obviousl