Retro Postings issue

Hi,
scenario:
June Month- Payroll Run ( RT generated) and Posting NOT done( missed).
July Month- Some Retro Changes done for June master data and July Payroll is Run( RT Generated) . Thereafter Posting is RUN for July and is successful.
Question: If there is no Posting for June Month , how come the Posting document of July is coming correct ( which contains retrospective June changes). My understanding is that if the Posting for an EE is missed for a particular month( in this case June) then subsequent month postings which has this month as retroaccounted - for period- ( here June), then system will not post.
Pls help me to understand.
I have used the DEV environment and have used the Simulation posting of July. for May Month I have the Live posting results in RT with Document as Posted. As stated earlier there is no Posting result of June as user missed it.
Also previous financial periods are open and have not been closed.
Thanks,

Hi,
What Naik is said is right.
Here posting of payroll results means we are showing the cost for the particular Cost center with the appropriate G/L account for the Accounting purpose only.
If you don't run live run in the month of june, then in the month of July it will run for the retro and in the July posting two months payroll salary will come. Once you run the payroll live run means system confirm that salary credited to Employee for this maintain Bank A/c (mode of payment from IT 0009) and it won't check whether it is posted to FI or not.
Need any clarifications revert back.
Best Regards.

Similar Messages

Automatic Intercompany Payment/Collection postings Issue

Hi All,
We have an intercompany scenario where we need to make actual payments between two company codes: Both the Company Codes are in SAP and in Same Client.
1) Intercompany receivables in company code A matching payables in company code B.
2) Payment run in company code B generates a payment from company B to company code A.
3) This payment run is supposed to create 2 idocs, 1. Out bound Idoc in Company B 2. Inbound Idoc. Which triggers a Posting (Dr. Bank Transitory Cr. Interco. Customer)
I am able to generate the Outbound Idoc through F110 (Payment Run). But inbound Idoc. is not getting generated in Company A. I managed to post an incoming payment advice IDOC using the test tool WE19. I just copied the outbound IDoc changed the sending / receiving ports etc, and changed the direction field in the control record- it posted without problems.
Necessary settings have been maintained in WE20, OBCA and OBDG and also in the Posting Rule. But I am still not successful in creating an incoming idoc. through F110.
WE20- Message Type REMADV & IDoc Type used is PEXR2002.
kindly share the details
Thanks & Regards,
Vikram K

Dear:
I guess you trying to tell that your company code deals with a customer A who
is your vendor B and that you want to set off your receivables
against dues owed by you? If yes then please proceed as under
I assume that your company code is yet to collect 600 $ from customer A
whereas you owe 800 $ to vendor B.
In customer master (control data screen), activate
a check box called vendor (T Code:FD02 or XD02)
Similarly, activate the check box called customer in the vendor master
screen(T Code :FK02 or XK02)
By doing so you have let SAP system know that your
customer A is also vendor B. You have done this at client level and this
relationship applies to all company codes dealing with customer A and vendor
B which is your basic requirement.
Now move on to the company code section of your customer master ( T code
FD02 or XD02) and activate a check box called clearing with vendor. Do the same thing with
your vendor master (T Code FK02 or XK02) and activate a check box called clearing
with customer.
This means that your company code wishes to set off receivables from
customer A against dues payable to your vendor B.
In F110 now you would be paying 200 $ to vendor B.
Hopefully this will resolve your issue.
Regards

Retroactive postings on HR extracted to BI

Hi guys, we are implementing BI HR, we have a problem that all the content cubes bring through data posted in the End-for period, in our case we need both. On the 0PY_PPC01 there is an ability to extract both time dimensions but it only collect data from certain wagetypes. Please advise which content cubes to use in order to extract retro postings.
Thank you
Rochelle

Our issue was solved by some information that we received from SAP.
This response was provided by Thomas Berndt of SAP:
The problem here is an authorization issue: In order to extract
project versions flagged as "Global" (field VERSION_USAGE = 1) the
user trying to read that versions need to be provided with
authorization CPRO_VSHDR. This works fine for user SAPUPDATE for
instance, but user ALEREMOTE which does the extraction, is not
sufficiently authorized for this, at least reading authorization needs
to be given.
This might not be straight forward, but is according to the design of
the versions: Unless explicitely authorized, these global versions are
not accessible.
More details on autorizations for versions can be found the
configuration guide I attached on page 87.

Provisioning issues with password changes

I have installed and configured IDM7.1+sp3 with our AS Java portal. Most features seems to work OK, except:
1.1. Changing fullname, display name, address, etc work - but salutation or title info doesn't display correctly (only when language independant).
1.2. Can lock the user - but not unlock.
1.3. Can change password (self service or via Management tab) - but password "disappears" and user can't login again via the UI or directly thru the LogonGUI.
1.4. If the user's password expires, he gets prompted to change it - this change works fine.
After "devouring" all the documentation I could fine... I read in the Release Notes the following:
2.1. Users are authenticated by the SAP NetWeaver AS Java (and not by the Identity Center). The password policy of the Identity Center is not used.
      = enabling or disabling "password provisioning" in the Password Policy tab makes no difference then?
2.2 The login task does no longer exist since the authentication is done by the SAP NetWeaver AS Java (UME).
      = ok I get this part...
2.3 Change of password is handled by SAP NetWeaver AS Java (UME) and the change password task is no longer available.
      = so the Password Reset tab is also "pointless"?
2.4 A user's MSKEYVALUE is used as the UME logon ID.
      = right
2.5 Password reset is handled by SAP NetWeaver AS Java. See SAP NetWeaver Identity Management Identity Center Implementation Guide u2013 Self-service password reset for details
      = (what should I do with this?) I did get this working but stopped with some error about the "encrypt password".
My SAP landscape is pretty standard (no custom fields/attributes) - so the IDM Provisioning framework should work "out of the box" - in my understanding...
Any ideas?
Sorry about the multiple postings - issue with proxy server. Pls ignore/remove the extras.

Hi.
I try to give some answers based on my experience below:
1.1. Changing fullname, display name, address, etc work - but salutation or title info doesn't display correctly (only when language independant).
>> Have you checked that the user has correct language set in Java UME? Also check that in Presentation page of the corresponding Attribute the Display name parameter is set with corresponding languages used.
1.2. Can lock the user - but not unlock.
>> Can you see any errors e.g. in Job Log? Would help to solve the issue
1.3. Can change password (self service or via Management tab) - but password "disappears" and user can't login again via the UI or directly thru the LogonGUI.
>> The reason might be the encryption of the password. Typically the UI should take care of the encrypting the password into MX_ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD attribute, especially when you're implementing tasks like Self Service Password Reset. I've noticed that when I disabled the Enable Password Provisioning option for the Identity Store, I got rid of the error regarding attribute MX_ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD and UI automatic encryption started to work. (In my case two way pwd provisioning is not needed) Otherwise if you have issues with encrypted password in your custom tasks, check whether the value is encrypted and use java script to encrypt the password when reading the value form the UI field and saving it to MX_ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD attribute, if applicable.
Hopefully this helps you even a bit.
Br. Jukka

Changing G/L account assignment causes reposting of receipt

Hi,
I had the requirement to change a G/L account to an new account as of this year. I delimited the symbolic account assignment and created a new record. Problem is, if I have to re-post an older trip, the old receipts repost to the new G/L account. We do not want retro-postings due to this change.
I changed table view V_T706K - Symbolic account assignment with a new begin date and new symbolic account assignment. Why does the Posting Run ignore the dates?

Hi Kenneth,
As per my understanding if the tripu2019s dates are between the change dates then this problem can occur.
As per the configuration done (which you can see in expert view), system fetches the data depends on three basis.
a.     As per trip first date
b.     As per trip last date
c.     As per receipt exact date
So in case if you create a trip of start date 15.01.2010 and end date 16.01.2010 and insert a receipt of 21.01.2010, it can fetch the config data of new GL account as per config.
I believe you have delimited the settings. Do let me know for any query.
Hope it helps you.
Thanks,
Vaibhav

Issue Retro Payroll with currency

Dear all!
I have problem, i try to find out the reason but not succeed. I am using Payroll Schema running for employee in India, of course currency is INR. However I hired 1 employee with currency as USD. The rate 1 USD = 46 INR. Decimal of INR is 3 in V_CURX, but USD I cannot find in V_CURX, but check in basic pay is 2.
If I run actual payroll for this PF on hiring period, there is NO issue. However because he joined after current payroll closed, so in next month we will run payroll for this guy. With my case, his previous salary is 1000 USD ( corrrect) and now is 3000 USD. So the Net pay in payslip is 4000 ( CORRECT). But the problem is Arrears in payslip, it not 1000, it show 10004610 (I guess multi 10 because of difference decimal) = 460000.
As I know, currency in Basic Pay will be used and standard for this PF, but why running retro, it multi with ratr?
Although Net Pay is correct, but if we send his payslip, he will confuse & may send why& why. Could you please help me to explain me why? and where I can check decimal ( I just found INR in V_CURX not USD).
Your good answer will be appreciated!
Please help me!
Regards!
Woody.

Dear experts!
          Please help me to solve my problem above?
          And could you please just guide me how SAP retro in first period ( Hiring or rehiring) that employee is maintained in other currency not default currency & bring this value into next period?
          I am looking forward to receiving your replies!
          I already try to check the operation: ADDWTD1009 -> the value will be count as I mentioned in entry above, but when I use ADDWTE1009, the value is correct. Could you tell me the special logic when update value into Difference Table? maybe I guess there are some exceptions especially employee's currency deffer with Default currency.
Regards!
Woody.
Edited by: minhnt on Sep 13, 2011 8:46 AM
Edited by: minhnt on Sep 13, 2011 2:47 PM

Payslip display issue for retro periods of a wage type

Hi,
we have an issue with payslip display for the rate field of an wage type.
we are genaearting the amount of a wage type 2000 using T511K constant. and we have changed the Rate of this constant in the mid of pay period.
if we have split in WPBP then we are getting payslip display for old and new rate. which is fine.
however if we don't have WPBP split for retro periods then payslip is clubbing the old and new rates hence the diaplay is wrong.
ex: wrong dispaly for retro periods (08/2009 one record with RTE as 6 and for 09,2009 another record with RTE as 6)
wage type          rate             number      amonut
2000                   12                2                12      (rate should be 6 however it is diaplaying 12 as taking rate of 08 & 09,2009         periods where it is comg as 6+6=12 which is wrong)
right dispaly should be
wage type          rate             number      amonut
2000                    6                   2                12      (rate should be 6, i.e 6*2=12)
Thanks
Gayathri

Hi Gayatri,
First check the values in payroll log or RT table. If its displaying correctly in RT table and if its problem with Payslip, then ask the abaper to debug the program.
Also check the WPBP table in RT table, because as you told that if there are any changes in the mid of the month, then the amount may split.
And if you have written any PCR for this, then check the PCR, whether its overwriting with any values.
Just check the above points.
Thanks & Regards
Bharathi

Payroll retro issue - related to /563

Hi PY experts,
Problem:
I have one PY retro issue.
Issue reported in December is :- One employee has a /563 claim of $18.45 (Claim from prev mth).
Why is here a deduction shown for this payslip?.
Issue reported in Jan 2010 is :- same employee has $99.3 (Claim from prev mth).
My analysis and details are as follows:-
December retro triggered for Oct,Nov.
Jan 10-retro triggered for June 09 onwards.
/561(amt employee owes to employer) in Nov in December run:- 18.45.
/561 in Nov in Jan'10 run:-117.75
So,
/563(claims from previous month) in December in december run:-18.45
/563 in December in Jan'10 run:-117.75
So,
99.30 SGD shown in Jan 2010 is the difference between the figures which was displayed in the last month.Ies (117.75 - 18.45 ) =99.30 .
-But my understanding is /561 will get formulated only in case the /110+/550 is negative.
But in this employee's scenario this amount is not coming as negative.Then how /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
There is only difference between different runs of payroll of /101 . here is no difference in /110 amounts for same months in different runs.
So retro triggered thru the payment wage types(Cumilation 01).So I have run the wage type reoprt for comparing these wage types.(I can fwd this to email)
My doubts /help required areas are :-
1) How /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
2) I can forward the details in proper excel format(easy to compare kind) -monthly wage type comparison report
which is related to (/101) wise reoprt , pls help me to find out how the exact amount is getting formulated.
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 10, 2010 7:00 AM
Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 AM

Hi,
I got the answers for the questions..
Can anybody pls help me by a document how all the technical wage types are getting formulated: ies
/140
/254 etc etc kind
This will help me for a faster derivation of the figure came in /563

Issue related to the Excise Postings

Issue related to the Excise Postings
My Scenario is i have an Purchase Order with Excise Duty of 16.48%
For Eg: Net Price(1000) + Excise Duty (16.48%) = Rs.1164.8
my vendor gives me a Modvat of 10% i.e Rs.104.8
but i have to pay him the total amount (i.e with excise)=Rs.1164.8
How to do the GR with Excise & Invoice Verification??
Wat amount will be Credited to vendor???
How to do Excise Posting for this Scenario???
Thanx & Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Message was edited by:
Kumar Rayudu

Hiii Ramakrishna,,
User doesnt know at the Time of Purchase Order that how much excise & Modvat will be getting. Only the Gross value is given in the Purchase order including all
taxes ( No Tax Code in the Purchase Order).
Excise Invoice and Vendor's Bill are received when the Materials are received.
They will get the Modavat according to the Excise Invoice of the Manufacturer
Now while doing GR i manually give the Excise BED & Cess given in the Manufacturer Excise Invoice.
Post the Excise Invoice before doing MIRO.
The Problem is in the MIRO Transaction.
At the MIRO i have selected the Tax Code with Excise.
System is caluclating the the Excise on the PO Value i.e more than the value in the Vendor Excise Invoice (Part 1 & Part 2) and the Liablity of vendor is increased and the difference amount is posted to the material.
Everything is going fine except the Vendor's liability and it should be value of the Purchase Order.
How the system is caluclating the Value ???
am i doing any wrong procedure???
Explain me???
Thanx & Regards.
Kumar Rayudu

Issue in Inter Company postings

Hi All,
Currently I face an issue with inter-company posting transaction. Let me explain the issue.
Using FB01 we can create inter-company postings by giving G/l and New Company code fields in the first screen. Let us say there are two company codes 0020,0040.
Giving these company codes and their corresponding G/ls in FB01 system creates 2 documents, one in each company code i.e, one document in 0020 and another document 0040. There will also be a link in the field Cross-CC no which says this is an inter-company transaction.
Following are my questions.
1.Can I create the INTER-COMPANY Postings using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST ? We can create accounting documents in both company codes 0020,0040 using this BAPI. But these two are becoming independent entries in each company code without any link ( Like the above case Cross_CC no) between them.
2.My another requirement is that I have to give an error message to user inside a user-exit while validating data. If I give message type E inside the user-exit it is giving the message but the normal flow is halted. It is going out with a blank screen with error message and the transaction is not going further. Is it possible to give error messages inside a user-exit without obstructing the normal flow of any transaction? The transaction can also be executed in Background.
Thanks for your help.
Vinod.

For question one I'm interested in doing the same thing.
Did you get an answer on how to do INTER-COMPANY postings using this BAPI?
BR and many thanks in advance.
Mattias

Segement derivation issue in HR Postings

Hi,
we are derving segement using the BADI fagl_derive_segment its working properly for all FI postings
We are facing issue with HR Postings to FI that time its not taking from BADI its taking from somewhere we unable to identifing
please any body help on this
regards

i want to hold at document level in FI
for Eg: to day am going to post the document through HR to FI but the employer will make the pmt in the next month for the particular employee for time being we need to hold the document in FI... if u know the procedure plz let me know

Retro issue Infotype 14 wagetypes

Hi Experts,
Changes in Infotype 0008 wagetype is working fine and is appearing in /551 .
Similar thing is not happening for IT0014 wagetypes. I've changed them from past date but the /551 doesn't get affected.
Already checked the retro settings in tables V_51P6_C & V_51P6_B
Appreciate your comments in this regard.

Could not able to understand,
The issue is some of the wage types in IT0014 which are changed from a past date aren't getting recalculated and arrears getting processed.
What is aren't getting recalculated- (no calculation no arrears)
Arrears getting processed - (calculation then only arrears comes into picture).
Regards
Venkatesh

Program RPURMD00 to undo TP postings Performance Issues

Hello All,
We have created incorrect Third Party positng documents in PCP0. These have not been posted yet. When we try to run the simulation program to undo postings (RPURMD00), it took more than 22 hours and we finally had to cancel it and restart. Even the second time it exceeded time limit. Undo process should happen to delete about 150 entries in Table T51R5. So I was expecting not more than an hour or so.
Is there a SAP note released to resolve this? Or is there an alternative to undo the postings?
Appreciate any quick responses.
Thanks,
Soujanya.

Can anyone please help me with this URGENT Issue:
Can I just delete/ignore the incorrect third party posting documents?
I am trying to run a simulation with the correct posting date parameters (before deleting the Incorrect documents), the third party posting do not seem to pick up any Garnishment vendors we are trying to post. Is this because, we still have the production Incorrect documents generated and not deleted.

Retro Issue

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario, plz help.
I have a wage type say overtime which is calculated indirectly on the basis of Basic Salary. This is paid to the employee group Apprentice. Arrears is also paid to this employee group if there is any back dated changes (like appraisal within the employee group) in the basic salary.But if the employee is promoted to the another employee group say executive from a back date then I dont have to pay the arrears to this employee even if the basic salary changes.
Now, the issue is that how to restict the system from calculating the arrears in 2nd case that is if the employee is promoted to the another employee group from back date.
plz suggest some way ou.
regards
TS

Hi,
Overtime wage type is allowed to the workers level only and overtime arrear wage time is also allowed to the workers level only.
But overtime arrear is calculated by the system itself during the retro run.....Now i want to restrict the retro in case the employee is promoted to the executive level.
How to handle this situation?
regards
TS

PL30 -Posting Balancing issue for postings across consolidation groups

Hi All
Greeting for the Day
We have implemented PL30 Upload for consolidation groups ,User is trying to post cross consolidation Groups as per one sample file with fields in the order mentioned below
100     2009     09
Cons Group/Doc type/C/i Activity/company/FS Item/movement type//investee company/Period value in GC
GABCD     301     05     ABCD     11610C     125          IJKL     -500
GWXYZ     301     05     EFGH     60102C     125          EFGH     500
now ABCD& EFGH belong to alotgether different consolidation groups GABCD & GWXYZ ,so while doing a flexi upload of the same system throws error
as below
Balance sheet/income statement balance 500,00 EUR
Message no. UCD1011
Diagnosis
The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
System Response
Entry cannot be posted.
Procedure
Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
So our understanding of the same is that for this kind of entry to balance at Legal entity level we need to have an offsetting account entry created on the flexi upload file
But want to know if there is any automatic way of doing the same without making users enter an offsetting entry
ANy other suggestions are welcome as well as there are lot of manual postings at this time which are time consuming so we want to cut it down by using Flexi upload
Rgds
Dheeraj

We have agreed with client on getting an offsetting account posting in the Flexi upload file
as nothing else works as it was against the accounting bit
Rgds
Dheeraj

Retro Postings issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for