Return Billing through Delivery no

Dear All ,
I want to do my return billing with refernce to the return delivery document no i. e
Return order> Return Delivery > Return Billing
But while doing so status of the deivery no becomes in document flow is shown as " Being Processed "
Can any one help me out
Regards
Satish

This can be due to one of things below, just chk it out.
1. check if the return delivery is carried out for all the items in the returns order.
2. check if the PGR has been carried out.
Regards
AK
Reward points if helpful

Similar Messages

VF04 - Listing both Return Orders and Delivery

Hi Experts!
I have a situation where by, when creating Return orders and delivery is done. When we go into VF04, when we select "order related" and "delivery related", there's two documents that can be invoiced. Either invoicing through order related or delivery related. How can we avoid this. I thought by default it should be delivery related unless it is a service related order that doesn't require delivery.
Anye ideas of where to check?

Dear,
check in customizing for the sales document type you use for Return sales order what you maintained in the tab view Billing.
Checkboxes of VF04 are linked to the definition of your sales document type.
If your Return sales order needs to be only billed as delivery related, in cuztomizing you should have only maintained in the billing tab view the field Dlv-rel.billing type.
If in customizing you maintained both: Dlv-rel.billing type and Order-rel.bill.type then when you go to VF04 and you check the two checkboxes you will always find your document.
I hope this explanation may help you.
In case I misunderstood your issue, do not hesitate to post you answer back.
Regards,

Cross Company STO w/billing through 3rd Company Code

We have the following situation with our Plants and Company Codes:
   1)     Company Code 1, Plant 1 (Manufacturing and Distribution), US
   2)     Company Code 2, Plant 2 (Manufacturing), Asia
   3)     Company Code 3, Plant 3 (Distribution), Europe
We are implementing functionality to move product directly from our Manufacturing Plants to our new DC. Product can be directly shipped from Plant 2 to Plant 3, but the invoice must flow through Company Code 1 due to legal reasons. This is only an invoicing requirement as they are not required to ever u201Cownu201D the stock (no transfer of ownership).
The solution being proposed right now utilizes 2 Cross-Company STOs (both with Delivery and Invoicing - NB and NLCC). This would involve creating an STO that would move product from Plant 2 to Plant 1 (invoicing between CCode2 and CCcode1), and then a 2nd STO (Cross Company) moving Product from Plant 1 to Plant 3 (invoicing between CCode1 and CCode3). However, the product would never physically arrive in Company Code 1/Plant 1. This is a "virtual" movement to meeting the invoicing requirements. I see this option as complicated logistically and probably requiring customization to keep the documents in sync and provide visibility to their relationship with each other.
I have spent a lot of time researching the forums, Wiki, etc. to see if there is an SAP Standard/Best Practice for the process of moving the Product (once produced) directly to the DC but invoicing via another (3rd) Company Code. It seems that many manufacturing companies must face this same situation. I just want to be sure forcing another complication in the Supply Chain is the best way to meet the financial requirements or if there might be a better option out there that others have implemented. Our goal is to simplify and optimize the Supply Chain, so it seems it just should be easier to meet this financial requirement than forcing Goods Movements in and out of a Plant and creating additional documents.
Does anyone have experience with this situation (Product sent directly between 2 entities, but billed through a 3rd entity) that they could comment on what is considered u201CBest Practiceu201D for this?

Hi,
I want to share one idea that during STO between company code 2&3, you need to createvendor master record in 3 company code. During creation of venor master create invoicing party (IP) as company code 1. Then invoice will be paid to company code 1.
Another solution is third party scenario. Any way this is intercompany STO, SOME WHAT RESEMBLES EXTERNAL PROCUREMENT INTERMS OF PAYMENT. Why can't you go for third party scenario. In this treat the company code 3 as customer and company code 2 as supplier of the material. Company code is the actual vendor, but orders the msterial from company code2. Company code2 directly delivers the materail to 3 and in company code 1 can do invoice. If required logical MIGO can br done. Hope it helps you. Thanking you.

Whast is order related billing and delivery related billing?

Explain about order related billing and delivery related billing
thanks

hi,
just to add,
In Customizing for the item category at VOV7, you can determine the basis for billing using the indicator <b>Billing relevance</b>.
This allows you to carry out the following controls:
A: Relevant for delivery-related billing documents
Outbound delivery is the basis for billing. The billing document status is only updated in the outbound delivery.
B: Relevant for order-related billing documents
The sales document is the basis for billing. The billing status is defined by the required quantity.
In the standard system the item categories REN (returns) and BVN (cash sales) are set up in this way.
So depending upon the billing documents configured to the sales document for order and delivery related billing, would be triggered based on the item category setting for billing relevance.
Pl reward if it helps.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore

Intercompany return billing problem

Hi experts
I met a question for intercompany return billing, in VF01, when I chose seletion list, it only list the batch split item with open quantity, it's ok to invoice here.
but when I invoice to customers, the main item didn't appear, it only has the batch split quantity as billed quantity. so no way to invoice customers.
any one can help me to solve this problem?
thanks in advance
elly

Hi,
Kindly check in copy control setting for the item category and if the billing quantity is {which is most probably at this moment for your setting} [ G ] then you will have to change it to [ H ].
Important to note that if you are using the standard F2 billing type and LF delivery type and TAN as item category then it is not advisable to change the Standard SAP settings at all.
Let me know on the same.
Hrishi

RETURNS BILLING DATE NOT CHANGING

Hi,
Returns came on : 01-01-2012 and PGR has done on the same day.
Billing RE credit returns has raised on 05-01-2012. While creating invoice for the returns system is creating invoice on 01-01-2012. But actually my client requires dis should happen on 05-01-2012.
I have changed the VTFL ( LR TO RE ) item VBRK/VBRP to Routine "11" But not achieved dis.
Can anybody suggest me how to achieved this.

Dear
I believe that you have return scenario like this:
Billing>Return Order(VA01)>DELIVERY+PGR>VF01(Credit for Returns)
before making your credit for returns you remove billing block form return order type
Now
1.VTAF: Billing to order copy control
Check at header level
Copying requirements for data transfer VBAK=052
Copying requirements for transferring business data=103
Copying requirements for partner data VBPA=003
Copying requirement=021
2.VTFL
Copying requirements=003
Determ.export data=
Assignment Number=E
Reference number=A

Pricing date in return billing document

Dear all
I have configured return process ie., delivery related return billing,
while taking return in retrun sales order pricing date of reference document
is copying and it should be copied into retrun billing also but it system is
taking current date as billing date in return invoice
where i have to make setting in coying controls
Pl help
Edited by: sapmonk18 on Nov 16, 2011 12:29 PM
Edited by: sapmonk18 on Nov 16, 2011 12:30 PM

Hi,
In copy controls item level Data VBRK/VBRP there might be 011Bill. date= Today,because of this system is taking billing date as todays,so select another routine like 007 Inv.Split (Rec/Div).
check and revert
Regards
Ram

Return billing

Whenever we want to take material returm from customer, v carry out return billing. But in this case to take retun Part2 entries, no scenario is available. so we carry out JV. Is there any procedure so that whenever v go for returning, part2 entries can be done?
pLS ADVICE

Hi,
In standard SAP Procedure, for Part 2 you to put a JV only and that should be done through Trasnactoion J1IH --> Additional Excise.
If more info required through then please revert back.
Regards,
Vishal

Reinitialize Sales Orders, Billing and Delivery (11, 12 & 13)

Hi,
Due to continues rollouts we need to reinitialize Sales Orders, Billing and Delivery do-cuments from R/3 into BW.
This requires us to delete all loaded data, logs, queues etc. on the BW side - Fair enough.
The real challenge come as we need to run the transactions OLI7BW(order), OLI8BW (billing), OLI9BW (deliveries) on the R3 side in order to fill the setup tables. Here we need to switch the "block all orders" on in order to ensure that no new documents are created while load-ing.
In relation to the above situation I have a couple of questions:
Is there no way of doing this in a more "online" fashion?
What transactions are actually blocked by flicking the "block all orders"?
Thanks in advance
Michael Bisfelt
Arla Foods a.m.b.a
Message was edited by: Michael Bisfelt

Hi Michael,
I've seen this process accomplished without blocking orders, but instead by blocking all transactions that may in any way lock an order or related sales document. Also, you can dramatically speed up the process of gathering the old documents by running multiple batch jobs (with different document number ranges) at the same time. In this case, I believe you want to "uncheck" the "New run" flag. I've seen runtimes for this reduced from over 24 hours to under 4 hours. The important thing is that you don't want to have ANY activity that modifies or locks order documents until after the date and time of termination that you specified, otherwise you will lose data on your transfer to BW.
Regards,
Chris

Billing and delivery address to be displayed in PO

Dear Gurus,
Here client requirement is as follows : There are three plants in three different places- Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad. Client is creating PO from Chennai plant and they want the material to be delivered in Bangalore plant. They want this to be displayed( billing and delivery address) in the purchase order. Kindly suggest me how to map this scenario.Thank you.

Hi,
For delivery adress you can use the subscreen for delivery adress in the item of the PO.
Por billing adress, if it's not the same that the adress for the center, you can do a subroutine for the form (Z)MEDRUCK for the company of these center, of you can create a partner 'Billing adress' and write it in form with a subroutine (Z)MEDRUCK.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Two Separate Billing Documents created in the collec Billing through VF04

Dear Forum Friends,
I am doing the collective Billing through VF04 for two deliveries (80015032 and 80015034) of the same day.
When I am finding in VF05 it has been observed that Two Billing documents instead of one billing document have been created against the two deliveries.
Could anybody guide where the problem is? I guess the problem is in Copy control but exactly what field is to be changed please guide me. I tried with the Data routine 003 and 007 but nothing happened.
Regards,
Jans

Dear Jans
If data from the related reference documents differs in the header fields of the billing document, the system will automatically split the invoice. For example, header datas like Payment Terms, Payer, Shipping Conditions etc differs, there will be invoice split.
To find out the reason for split analysis, proceed as follows:
Enter the number of the first billing document that you wish to compare.
Choose Environment --> Split analysis.
Enter the number of the second billing document which you wish to compare to the first in the dialog box.
Enter the billing document number and choose Continue.
The system displays the Billing document split analysis log. It is made up of three parts. The first shows the header partners and header fields which are different in the two documents while the second and third columns show the respective values for these fields.
This provides you with a clear overview of which fields have differing contents, the information available, and why there was an invoice split.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

STO for Muliple Plants through delivery

Dear Gurus,
I have configured the STO process through Delivery and Shipment for my 4 plants within one CC. The process is running end to end. The problem is that one of my plant can recieve stock from any one of my other 3 plants or you can say that 1 plant can transfer stock to any of the other 3 plants as the requirement arises.
Unfortunately, in SAP Customizing Implementation Guide - Materials Management - Purchasing - Purchase Order - Set up Stock Transport Order - Define Shipping Data for Plants there is provision for entering only one customer number and I have created a separate customer master for all 4 of my plants. I need to do this for automatic route determination.
Can anyone please suggest a solution or a work around for this process.

The customer in V_001W_IV-KUNNR is "plant customer", it represents the issuing / supplying plant to which it is assigned and not the customer(s) of receiving plant(s).
You have to extend this customer to the STO sales area of its own plant and of the receiving plants'. Whenever you create an sTO in which the receiving plant is this, the plant customer will appear in the delivery as ship-to. Independently from the supplying plant, the ship-to party is the same if the receiving plant is the same.
So, one of them is enough even if you have several plants and you want to have STOs between them.
You can define several customers for issuing plant based on plant/storage location combinations:
SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set Up STO > Set Up Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations > Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
However I guess you only have to understand how this works and you need only one customer per plant...
Please understand how it works before sending lots of messages...
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 23, 2010 4:19 PM

Ship-to party for Returns to vendor delivery

Hi,
I have a problem for a return to vendor delivery wherein the Ship-to party value is incorrect. The value is suppose to be the one maintained in the vendor master. However in this case, the vendor master has no value. The system does not show any warning or error message.
I would like to ask if there is no value in the vendor master, where else does the system picks up the value for the Ship-to party during returns delivery.
many thanks,
mylene

For Sales Document..
SELECT * FROM VBPA
                 INTO TABLE <ITAB>
                 WHERE        <YOUR CONDITION>
                 AND             PARVW = 'WE'.
PARVW- If Partner Function eq 'WE' then it is ship to party, if 'AG' then sold to party
Check Value table TPAR

EDI :Through delivery process I want send the notification to the customer

hi friends
During delivery i want to send the notification to the customer ..i want to configure the EDI ..So what are the steps to require to
do the configuration.
with regards
dinesh

Hi ,
Through delivery Process ASN can be sent to customer.
All other master data and process steps are same.
You have to make following settings in the system
1) Create port (WE21)
2) Set up Partner Profile WE20
3) Create condition records in NACE for V2(Shipping) , output type LAVA. (Communication type withh me EDI (6))
4) during outbound delivery save/Goods issue , the o/p type should be triggered and generate the IDoc.
This IDoc is an outbound idoc. Check WE02 for idocs. You will find a inbound Idoc -> which we will inturn create an Inbound delivery (ASN) automatically.
Configure the steps.If you need further more help on this.Please get back.
Best Regards,
Nisha

MD04-Returns PO and Delivery

Hi All,
Please help me understand stock/requirements list (MD04) with respect to return PO.
when a return PO is created and a delivery is created for that, both the MRP elements (return PO and the delivery ) appear in MD04 screen.
The stock/requirements calculation is done with the MRP element ( Return PO) and when a delivery is created for the return PO, the delivery is also displayed as MRP element. The return PO does not disappear and the stock/requirements calculation is not udpated with respect to the corresponding delivery.
Why does the return PO not work in the same way as that of sales order (where the sales order disappears upon delivery creation) or that of a planned order ( where the planned order disappears upon creation of production order).
Is it possible to have only 1 requirement (either the return PO or the delivery), but not both together.
Regards,
CB

Dear,
You define whether you expect to receive substitute deliveries relating to the shipping notification. In other words, you define whether the shipping notification should become MRP active again so you do not, or no longer expect the difference quantity from the point of view of materials planning.
·        1. Do Not Close Inbound Delivery
If you do not close the inbound delivery then you expect to receive further quantities/dates to the amount of the quantity that is still open. In other words, the shipping notification becomes MRP-active again.
·        2. Close Inbound Delivery
If you close the inbound delivery then a shipping notification or order item is regarded as closed, even if the goods receipt quantity differs from the notified quantity. The remaining quantity is then no longer taken into account in MRP.
In this case, you could also specify in the quantity difference profile whether or not the scheduled quantity should be adjusted.
Create Return Delivery with Outbound Delivery
You define whether a return delivery is created with or without an outbound delivery:
·        1. Return delivery without outbound delivery
This means that a material document is generated immediately when you post the return delivery.
In the purchase order history you see a material document for the goods receipt and one for the return delivery.
·       2. Return delivery with outbound delivery
This means that the system automatically creates an outbound delivery in the background when you post quantity differences in Goods Receipt Automotive.
The material document is not generated until goods issue for the outbound delivery has taken place. In the purchase order history and the confirmation overview for the scheduling agreement you see the return delivery as a separate delivery.
The MRP-reduced quantity does not change by the amount of the returned quantity until goods issue has taken place for the outbound delivery. The inbound delivery and the outbound delivery are then calculated in MRP terms.
The quantity that is still open is proposed again when an inbound delivery (with reference to a scheduling agreement) is created.
The inbound delivery and the related outbound delivery are displayed in the confirmation overview for the scheduling agreement. The External Document of the outbound delivery in the confirmation overview specifies the related inbound delivery.
You have posted a goods receipt of 10 pc for an inbound delivery.
Due to quality problems you return 2 pc.
In the confirmation history you see two rows, one for the inbound delivery and one for the outbound delivery/return delivery. The MRP-reduced quantity is calculated by taking into account both the inbound delivery and the outbound delivery/return delivery, making the MRP-reduced quantity 8 pc.
Also check the below link:
http://www.sapgeek.net/2010/03/return-to-vendor-4/
Hope it will help.
Regards,
Alok Tiwari
Edited by: Alok Kumar Tiwari on Jul 12, 2011 3:17 PM
Edited by: Alok Kumar Tiwari on Jul 12, 2011 3:25 PM

Return Billing through Delivery no

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for