Reverse Charge up of budget again during settlement from project AUC to FA

With investment profile,
Charging up of budget during settlement from project AUC to FA is done,
In order to reverse the budger consumption, is it possible to reverse by FB08 for the AUC to FA posting
Or it must be done through adjustment?
Please includes steps and transactions used to achieve the reversal.
Edited by: Feng Hwa Hui on Aug 12, 2009 10:04 AM

Question closed.

Similar Messages

Asset Value Date determination during settlement from Orders or WBS!

Hi,
I have a scenario on the asset value date and I am not sure what went wrong, asset side or CO side.
The scenario is as following:
1. Asset was converted into the system by 7/31/2008 with $10000.
2. The capitalized on date is 2/29/2008 on the asset master data.
3. On 8/31/ 2008, I charged $300 to an internal order and settled the $300 to this asset. The Asset Value Date on the Asset Explorer is 8/15/2008.
4. On 9/30/2008, I charged #500 to the same internal order and settled the $500 to this asset, the Asset value date on the asset explorer for this charge is still 8/15/2008.
This messed up the depreciation of this asset. Does anyone know how to control the asset value date from the settlement? Do we need to config in Asset side or in Order side? I want the $300 charge's value date is on 8/15/2008 and $500 value date on 9/15/2008. Is this possible?
Thanks,
Ting

In the settlement you can fill in the asset values date.
The first posting is the basis for capitalization date(when you don't fill it in manual), when you fill it in for the second time the Asset Value Date it is no longer relefant.
This is only important when you have say in your depreciation key that the depreciation is based on days( see the help on this field)

Will Project Budget be available again after settlement to AUC/final asset?

I would like to know if my project budget will become available again once I settle costs to AUC and to Final asset (or settle directly to final asset w/o AUC).
Letu2019s say my original budget for WBS is 5000, cost was posted to the WBS u2013 4000, now I settle the 4000 cost to AUC (and eventually from AUC to final asset). Will this mean the entire 5000 will be available again since the cost has been settled from WBS to AUC (and eventually fixed asset)?
Thanks!
Vivian

If you have Budgeted WBS element and than after you does any cost postings against that WBS. you budget get consumed by that actual cost.
however, WBS element is capturing cost for the period of project duration that cost has to transfer to FI/ CO , finally so, at the period-end we does the settlement & transfer taht cost to cost center , PA , asset etc....
So, no point that after settlement your budget will be your initial budget.
Regards
Nitin

CJ88 - Balance the budget back after settlement

I got out the following structure:
WBSE
--- WBSE1
--- WBSE1-2 -> AUC Settlement to
--- WBSE2
| --- WBSE2-2 -> Settlement to WBSE1-2
When the Execute CJ88 to liquidate the project, the following problem is occurring.
The WBSE2-2 is the value to the liquidating WBSE1-2 and turn the whole WBSE1-2 net value for the AUC.
Upon conclusion of the budget process that had been consumed in WBSE2-2 and released novamentepara be consumed.
Therefore necessary that the amount realized on WBSE2-2 is settled in the AUC of WBSE1-2, more than the budget is consumed in dayValue WBSE2-2 instead of being available again.
All are WBSE account assignment.
Edited by: André Luis Pereira Santos on Mar 18, 2011 3:01 AM

just I want to know what could be the reason for dfference for target cost debit and target cost credit in process order. As both are from standard cost estimation.
in reality our header material cost is nothing but BOM components + operational cost which are used in standard cost estimattion.
there by there should not be any difference.
regs,
ramesh

On Advance & Invoice Reverse Charge Mecanism in SAP

Reverse Charge Mechanism is to be Calculated on advance or Invoice which ever is Earlier. then how the RCM Calculated on Advance is to be reversed if we calculate again RCM on total amount on Invoice

Hi,
Please elaborate.
Regards,
Tejas

User-exit during settlement of PM orders to COPA

HI,
We have a situation where a plant maintenance order type is sometimes charged to a customer. In those cases, the costs are sent to SD using a DIP profile, the customer invoiced. with the PM orders as the cost object for the revenue posting. At the end of the month, the PM order is settled to COPA. But I also need to duplicate the entry on the cost centre....
So I need two user-exits, one of which I have.
I need a user-exit to override the automatically derived settlement rule, so that I can put in a PSG as settlement receiver.
Then somewhere, either at the time of the billing doc release to accounting, but preferably at the time of the settlement posting into COPA, I need a user-exit where I can quickly post an FI document.
COPA0002, which we use for something similar in postings from SD to COPA, seems not to be triggered during settlement postings. The same is true of the Fm's for COPA0005.
Does anybody know of a user-exit that gets triggered during settlemnt to COAP from orders?

Hi
Your settlement rule says "Settle to Cost Center" only.... I dont think any user exit can help in this case, if you want to settle occasioanlly to 2 cost objects
Try with these options
Option A
1. Remove the 100% validation tick in the settlement profile...
2. Maintain 2 settlement rules... i.e. One with Cost center and another with PSG... If any warning comes, ignore it
3. Execute settlement now
Option B
1. Maintain settlement rule with PSG as settlement receiver
2. In the same Settlement rule, Menu GO TO > DETAILS and maintain Cost Center also....
3. Now execute settlement...
Option C
1. Maintain settlement rule with PSG as settlement receiver
2. In the same Settlement rule, populate Cost Center also as a Valid Characteristic
3. Now execute settlement...
BR,Ajay M

HT1657 My movie rental download was not completed and I was unable to finish the movie. I was charged for it. What can I do to rent the movie again without getting charged for the rental again?

My movie rental download was not completed and I was unable to finish the movie. I was charged for it. What can I do to rent the movie again without getting charged for the rental again?

kananga wrote:
To begin, what ADA-compliant options are available to work with a service representative? Good question, and one that I don't know the answer to. Does anything on this page help? Products & Services Overview | Verizon Wireless
1) I was charged for service following the cancellation of my service; this includes a period following cancellation during which no service was provided. Service is normally billed through the end of the billing cycle, whether service is provided or not. "Cancellations will become effective on the last day of that month’s billing cycle, and you are responsible for all charges incurred until then." After working with a representative in person, I was told that my final bill would be adjusted to reflect the legally billable amount. According to their legal docs, the "leagally billable amount" is through the end of the billing cycle. This was three weeks ago and I haven't received a response, and I haven't been able to find a way to pursue a resolution - What can I do to help move this process forward?
2) It appears I will be unable to pay my bill after this dispute has been reviewed. My phone number is no longer with Verizon. The online bill payment login requires a phone number - I have never been provided with any other account number. Unfortunately, Verizon appears to close access to online bill payment when the phone number is transferred, even to accounts with unpaid invoice amounts. How can I pay my bill online? You cannot pay online once the account is cancelled. You will be mailed a paper copy of the final bill, and you can mail a check, or possibly call in and pay over the phone. But online is no longer an option once the account is cancelled.

Invoice: Reverse Charge

Hello @all,
My company is settled in Germany. In my invoice for the Creative Cloud license, there is no VAT added, as the Adobe Systems Software is based in Ireland. There is a hint to reverse-charge and my obligation, as a client, to take care of the VAT. I hope I am explaining it in English in the correct way (Original text: "Abzugsverfahren (Reverse Charge) - Umsatzsteuerschuld liegt beim Kunden DE180297473")
Does anyone know something about this topic? Any helpful information is appreciated.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Nudsch

Hi,
Please elaborate.
Regards,
Tejas

Error when reversing settlement back to Auc - Balance in transaction curren

Hi,
We get following error when reversing a settlement from asset back to Auc (using AIST):
FI/CO interface : Balance in transaction currency
Message No. RW022
This error only occurs when we settle a portion of the amount sitting in AuC and not the full amount. (When we settle full amount in AuC to final asset we can reverse no problem).
When we do a partial settlement to final asset, SAP creates a document and in that document it posts a debit and credit for the unsettled amount e.g. 50k in Auc and we settle 45k to final asset with 5k remaining in Auc - the document looks as follows
AuC     5,000.00-
Auc      5,000.00
AuC    45,000.00
Final Asset    25,000.00-
Final Asset    20,000.00-
The 5k above is the unsettled amount still sitting in AuC
When we try reverse we get error message RW022 and detail is as follows:
    The balances in transaction currency must be zero for each logical
    transaction when transferring to the FI/CO interface. A balance of "
    5,000.00-" "CAD" was determined for the logical transaction "AZVZ".
System Response
    The FI/CO interface does not process any transactions which have a
    balance in transaction currency other than zero.
Procedure
    This is a system error of the calling application.
Note: We do use line item settlement in asset classes
Much appreciate any help..

Hello,
You may need to check SAP notes below regarding this issue:
1523814   Transaction AIST ends with error RW 022
1514384   Error message RW 022 after Note 1444750 implem
1444750   Postings without transaction currency
I hope it helps.

Handle Reverse charges tax lines from Sabrix for creation of new Invoice document.

Hi Gurus,
I am facing an issue in case where Sabrix is returning Reverse Charge Lines as show below:
Tax Rate
Tax Amount
Tax Base
-0.24
-240
1000
0.24
240
1000
The original invoice Line item was as follows:
Net Amount : 1000.00
Tax Amount : 0.00
PO Number at line level.
Tax code : I1
Now, I am using BAPI : BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE to create an invoice document for non reverse charge scenarios. I am filling table : GLACCOUNTDATA with other details such as GL account, tax code, amount, etc from Invoice related document and PO.
But I have no idea where should I push these reverse charge lines.
Please help me from technical perspective on how to assimilate these reverse charge lines.
Thanks and Regards,
Saurabh.

HELLO STAR SHANKAR SIR,
Oh gr8. first time seeing this type of question.....
u r really...................
with regards
Suvetha
Gayathri

Reversal of settlement from Asset to WBS

Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding reversal of settlement from AUC to asset.
I have so many line items on a WBS element, which i settled to AUC. I can see all the line items that are capitalized to AUC in CJIC screen, where i create settlement rules to settle to asset.
I have created one settlement rule for 4 line items and settled to an Asset 1. After that I have created another settlment rule for another 5 line items to settle to an asset 2 and run the settlement in CJ88 using partial capitalization, since I have some more lines left in the CJIC.
Now, when I am trying to reverse the settlement on WBS system is reversing whatever settled on asset 2 to back to AUC. I want to reverse the line items settled on Asset 1. Is it possible? If so, how can i do that? I can see all the settlements on the WBS in CJID. But, how can i reverse any settlement that is 3 to 4 months older. We are doing 4 to 5 settlements in a month
Thanks,
Satya

reversal transaction will reverse what was transacted
so you need to reverse for both asset 1 and 2 and then edefine the settlement as required after correction and then settle again

GST Malaysia reverse charge through Deferred tax

Dear Community Members,
rather than following SAP's suggestion to implement (at least) the four notes 1979386, 2000583, 2011533 and 2062785, we decided to go for a custom development to post the reverse charges, I mentioned that in an earlier blog entry http://scn.sap.com/blogs/GST_Malaysia/2014/11/28/reverse-charge-mechanism. It creates separate postings based on the clearing documents and the original invoices.
What I'm not happy about are the looks of these postings in the GST-03 report. The reverse charge postings from the custom program are G/L postings with no reference to the vendor, they show no business partner in the GST-03 report.
To those of you who got the reverse charge mechanism posting working through SAP's propose solution of Deferred Tax, can you please let me know whether the business partner is correctly populated in the GST-03 report for the reverse charge postings?
Thanks and regards,
Christoph

Hello Sonal,
thanks for your reply.
The mentioned SAP note is fixing the wrongly displayed business partner as the variable was not cleared.
My question was rather aiming at what the report will be showing if the Deferred Tax solution is correctly implemented. Is the business partner then also empty for the reverse charge postings?
Best Regards,
Christoph

Problem in Settlement Receiver during Settlement Rule in T.code IW31/32

Hi,
We have created an Equipment Number 11001212 with Business Area 1451 / Cost center 145130100. After that when are create Order in respect to that Equipment Number through IW31.
During Settlement Rule, when we select Account assignment category CTR - Cost Center...and press F4 on Settlement Receiver column, it shows the value in respect to all Cost Centers.
We want that in settlement receiver column, values should show in respect to related cost center. (defined as per Equipment Master).
Please guide...

Hi,
Pass the Order number in AFIH to get Equipment Number (EQUNR) value.
Pass the Equipment No in V_EQUI table with Valid to date (DATBI) as 31.12.999 & get the value of ILOAN value.
Pass this value in ITOB table & get Cost Center KOSTL value.
In IWO10027 user exit, in F4 possible entry option, ABAP people can restrict the required cost center.
IWO10009 PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
Even though the user enters manually some other cost center without going for F4 option, by check that value, you can give the error message, while saving the order.
Pass the Order number in AUFK table to get Object Number (OBJNR).
Pass OBJNR value in COBRB table to get KOSTL value.
Compare both the value & you can give the error message.
Give these tables, fields & user exits to ABAP people. They can form the correct logic.
Incorporate both the logic.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Using Firefox 3.6 after a few mouse click/ keyboard input the firefox window is no more active, mouse click and keyboard input is inactive ; then I click on the taskbar and the keyboard is active again during a few click then it stops again etc.

Using Firefox 3.6 after a few mouse click/ keyboard input the firefox window is no more active, mouse click and keyboard input is inactive ;
to solve it I click on the taskbar and the keyboard is active again during a few click then it does not work any more and I click again on the task bar etc.
after several repetitions, I have to call the task manager alt+del+ctrl, then come back to the firefox window to be able to use keyboard and mouse again

Attaching the picture for the tab shape I want...

Reverse settled cost of AuC

Hi All,
We have settled cost to AuC in Mar' 08 and now we can reverse it in Mar'09, Is it possible? When I try to reverse it the following message is displayed, " Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 012 2009. Message No. KD547.
pls. guide how to go about with this situation.
Regards,
Aman

Hi Aman,
Please refer SAP Note 31163 for your needful
Regards,
Santosh

Reverse Charge up of budget again during settlement from project AUC to FA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for