Reversing the Results Analysis after settlement

Hi
can anyone elaborate on the possibility of reversing the RA postings after carrying out the Settlement as part of period end closing.
Any information on this is welcome
Venu

Hi,
For RA method 14 please find the link,may be you are missing some config.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/EN/90/ba6f37446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Muzamil

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Reversal of Result Analysis Posting

    Dear Experts,
    I would like to ask for suggestions in solving below case in my current project:
    1. Project is created for sales of power solutions. Most of them are long-term, thus cost-based revenue recognition method is applied.
    2. Result analysis with cost-based method (03) is periodically executed for project. Therefore, every month there are some revenue deferral/ accrual posting calculated based on actual cost - before the project is completely billed.
    3. It is expected for revenue deferral/ accrual posting resulted from result analysis to be automatically reversed immediately in the next period (e.g. if RA is executed for July 2014, reversal posting needs to be immediately posted with posting date Aug 1st, 2014).
    At first we were thinking to define new document type specifically for the result analysis posting, and perform mass reversal using F.80 transaction. But then we came to realize that result analysis entries are posted after settlement is executed -and accounting document generated from settlement transaction cannot be directly reversed in finance.
    Anyone has encountered the same issue? How do we reverse result analysis posting without reversing the whole settlement transaction?
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Analistia

    Hello,
    First you need to configure the functionality from the bellow path
    SPRO Financial AccountingGeneral Ledger Accounting Business Transaction  Manual Accruals  Basic Settings
    Once Engine configured Accrual document can be created through the easy access menu.
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Create Accrual Objects
    Execution of Accrual documents
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Start Periodic Run
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Display document of the results analysis for Project

    Hello expert,
    I'd like to know if a transaction exists to display the document for which I can find the number in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and which is linked to the displayed line items.
    Any idea?
    Regards,
    Céline O.

    Hello,
    I'm looking for a transaction to display the document which is created for the calculation of the results analysis.
    We can find the number of the document when we run the KKA2 transaction : Menu/ Resutl Analysis/ Display Line Items of result Analysis.
    That document number is also shown in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and I'd like to find a way to display it easily ((like FB03 for the accounting document, for example) by using the document number only.
    Céline O.

  • Reverse the recon key after transferring to GL

    Dear Experts,
         Is it possible to reverse the Recon key after transferring to GL. As per my knowledge we can't reverse the recon key after transferring. If it is possible please inform to me.
    Thanks,
    Ran

    FPG8 can be used to reverse the key transfer. 

  • Results analysis and settlement for projects with Sales Order

    Hi Costing Gurus,
    We are implementing SAP for ECO business in ECC 6.0 with SD, FICO and PS modules and we have contracting jobs which will run for longer periods. we are planning to POC method based on actual cost and Progress billing methods in projects. my understanding is that Reasults analysis will be used to calculate the WIP, Reserves, Losses etc.. however revenue has to be recognized using sales and distribution module with (SD-BIL-RR) component. How ever i have started testing this scenario in test system and i have couple of clarifications and seeking some help from experts to correct my understanding.
    i have below questions.
    1. KKA* . results analysis only calculates the amounts (WIP, reserves, losses etc.) or it can update the accounting.
    2. i found from the blogs and online documents FI posting only happens through settlement and it specifies the Profitability segemnt should be used as receiver in Project . is it madatory to use profitablty segemnt. as we are not implementing COPA can i use any other object and what would be the impact of it.
    currenty i have selected update RA key and i could find no FICO documents created with that.
    3. Do i need to use Revenue recognition in SD along RA in controlling to get my accrual posting for recenues. RA can only serve Cost part of the project or it can Revenue accrual also ?
    Seeking expert suggestion on this.
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hello Murali-
    To answer your questions,
    1. When you perform Results analysis, it does not post any accounting documents. Results analysis only does calcuation of WIP etc and when you do corresponding settlement like CO88(production order) or VA88 (sales order), it will post accounting entries.
    2. It is not mandatory to have profitability segment as a receiver. If you are using COPA, then you would need to settle it to COPA in the end. For example in case of make to order environment, sales order can be used as  a cost object and hence the receiver would be a sales order where all the costs would get settled.
    Hope this helps.
    Shail

  • Reverse the result recording in QM

    What is the process of cancel the result recording in stage of INSP RREC SPQR lot statuse in SAP QM.

    Hi,
    Just go to QE12..Result Recording changes for the inspection point. Enter the inspection lot, operation number and the sample number.
    The next screen will show the results. Click on the option  "Put to Process" The status will change from 5 "Processing completed" to 2 "Inprocess". Then remove the result for that characteristic and save it. Automatically your result recording will be reversed.
    Please ask me if you need any other details.
    Regards,
    Srinivas.D

  • Showing the results window after termination

    Hi all,
    When I terminate my batch sequence execution in TS 4.0 using "RunState.Engine.TerminateAll()", it shows grayed-out windows and won't show the results window, even though it saves the results into an XML file on disk.
    Is there a way I can show the results window to the operator after the sequence is terminated?
    Many thanks,
    Chris
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    If you look in your model you will find a step called Read Entire Report.  This is just making an activex call to Report.Load.  This is what displays the report at the end of an execution.  If this does not get called no report will get loaded.  Since you are terminating then no report is getting loaded.  In fact if you don't have on the fly reporting on then the html files that make up each thread of a multithreaded batch run won't contain any data which will result in no report. 
    If you use the ProcessCleanup callback you should be able to load the report in there. 
    jigg
    CTA, CLA
    teststandhelp.com
    ~Will work for kudos and/or BBQ~

  • Results Analysis: WBS settlement approach when PA has not been activated?

    Greetings all,
    We need to implement RA for our revenue projects in PS, but Profitability Analysis (PA) hasn't been activated and may stay that way. Is there any other suitable settlement receiver in this case?
    One cannot settle revenues to Cost Centres.
    Settling to revenue Orders may(?) remove costs from PS costs reporting and one would need an order per profit centre.
    Setting to GL? (is this plausible? how?)
    I thought of settling to SD order item, but item is account assigned to project for cost/revenue reporting in PS and I don't think SAP then allows settlement back to SD item as a cost bearing object?
    Any ideas please?
    Could PA be activated very simply (without a large implementation effort)?
    Thanks in advance...
    Charles.

    Hi Virendra,
    I see that the FI posting is purely FI and doesn't have any corresponding CO documents. The origin for the PC document is '1' (PC), and the P&L GL accounts for the RA-FI auto postings were not allowed to have CO costs elements linked and don't have CO account assignment to project. This means that the project reports don't reflect any RA adjustments. The RA reports also don't show values per period, RA doesn't seem to post line items (report is blank - config?) and it's not possible to know what's been posted to FI (settled) per project (RA calculated versus posted to FI).
    We ideally require to see the RA actual posting against the project as a line item. Is this configurable - have I missed something?
    Regards,
    Charles.

  • CJ88 - Balance the budget back after settlement

    I got out the following structure:
    WBSE
    --- WBSE1
    --- WBSE1-2 -> AUC Settlement to
    --- WBSE2
            | --- WBSE2-2 -> Settlement to WBSE1-2
    When the Execute CJ88 to liquidate the project, the following problem is occurring.
    The WBSE2-2 is the value to the liquidating WBSE1-2 and turn the whole WBSE1-2 net value for the AUC.
    Upon conclusion of the budget process that had been consumed in WBSE2-2 and released novamentepara be consumed.
    Therefore necessary that the amount realized on WBSE2-2 is settled in the AUC of WBSE1-2, more than the budget is consumed in dayValue WBSE2-2 instead of being available again.
    All are WBSE account assignment.
    Edited by: André Luis Pereira Santos on Mar 18, 2011 3:01 AM

    just I want to know what could be the reason for dfference for target cost debit and target cost credit in process order. As both are from standard cost estimation.
    in reality our header material cost is nothing but BOM components + operational cost which are used in standard cost estimattion.
    there by there should not be any difference.
    regs,
    ramesh

  • Can I Reverse The Accounting Document after Periodical Processing

    Dear Friends !
    Few Months ago One Accotung Entry happend through SD ( Billing) for Export. at the time of period-end activities for the accounting Document processed by Foriegn currency valution..
    Now Sales people reversed that transaction , Cancel Document Happend but no Accouting document was generated??
    Log shows like this "
    "Reversal of document 0705v1 1000001633v2 2007v3 not possible in FI"
    Message no. F5A 005
    Diagnosis
    Item &v4 in accounting document 0705 1000001633 2007
    was valuated with an open item foreign currency valuation.
    System Response
    Document cannot be reversed.
    <u></u>

    In case of Foreign currecy valuation, reversal of the valuated should happen on the first day of the next month. Otherwise, these type of problems will raise.
    First, check the foreign currency valuated items reversed or not, if not please reverse them and try to do the current transaction.
    Let me know if you still face the problem
    VVR

  • Settlement in CJ88 after succesful results analysis on WBS

    Dear All,
    When I run CNE1 after i have estimated my PoC on my WBS project, this is succesful. I calculate the results analysis succesfully in KKA2 for my project. When i want to post the settlement of the RA, I receive errors such as "Maintain settlement rule on sender" and "the GL account needs a CO assignment".
    My settlement rule is 100% PER and is maintained on every level of the WBS structure except one position which is the Receiver.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks Debora

    Hello Debora
    The Error   KD 205 is issued during settlement becasue  the results analysis is calculating costs of sales on line ID level.
    Those costs of sales do add up to zero, but as settlement   is checking on line ID level, the message is issued.
    To avoid that results analysis is calculating cost of sales if  you choose special function B in the valuation method (OKG3).
    The system will then calculate negative WIP instead of reserves for
    unrealized costs in the case of negative actual costs (see notes  365075 and 385616).
    If you do want reserves for unrealized costs being calculated in the case of negative actual costs, but no costs of sales
    (no error KD 205  when no settlement rule exists),
    you could also change the method  of apportionment in OKG3 to 'I'. The reserves for unrealized costs
    will then be apportioned in proportion to the actual costs, so no cost of sales will be calculated on line ID level.
    hope this helps
    Ger

  • Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

    Hi Experts
    My client has two company codes.
    CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
    As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
    In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
    With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
    And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration.  There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
    So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

    Dear Gurus,
    I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
    We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
    We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
    Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
    billing through Settlement.
    I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
    Thanks,
    Viswas Anantharangachar

    Hi,
    In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
    Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
    Enjoy SAP….
    Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
    Namskar,
    Ketan Dave

  • Result Analysis Posting to FI incase of Projects.

    Dear All,
           What settings & steps need to be done to carry out postings for the result analysis data to FI in case of Projects.
           Thanx in advance.
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Message was edited by:
            Santosh Singh

    Hi,
    If there is no posting happening in FI then there could be some thing wrong in Cost element / G/L assignment as this will play major role in carrying cost / revenue from project to settlement receiver. Please cross-check your settlement configuration as this will carry calculated revenue / cost from project to FI. Please take the help of FI/CO consultant on this matter.
    After calculating revenue / cost through RA, the same will be settled to a receiver such as PSG / G/L etc. There is only one steps after RA i.e. project settlement
    If you want to post calculated revenue / cost into FI then calculated result after RA need to be settled to permanent cost object. However after RA, details can be obtained at project level.
    In order do settlement, you have to configure settlement profile of the project with allocation structure / PA transfer structure / source structre (if required) etc.
    The critical in settlement configuration is proper debit or and  credit account should be defined properly to carry out calculated revenue / cost from project to permanent cost object.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Results Analysis Keyu2019

    What is the significance of u2018Results Analysis Keyu2019 parameter in process order?

    Hi,
    RA Key that defines the valuation of the order during period-end closing.
    How the results analysis key is used depends on the nature of the order.
    For orders with revenue ( internal orders, sales orders, and projects), the results analysis key determines how results analysis is carried out.
    Results analysis is recommended in the following situations:
    When you are using a nonvaluated sales order stock or nonvaluated project stock and you want to valuate the inventories at the end of the period
    When you are using a valuated sales order stock or valuated project stock and want to valuate goods that have been delivered but not yet invoiced, or when you want to create reserves automatically
    For orders without reference to a sales order item or WBS element, the results analysis key determines how the work in process is calculated.
    The production type can be make-to-stock or mass production on the basis of sales orders. The work in process is calculated at the level of the production order, process order, or product cost collector.
    For capital investment measures, the results analysis key determines how the system calculates the values to be capitalized.
    Examples
    For orders with revenue, costs may be incurred before any revenue is received. If you are using a nonvaluated sales order stock, results analysis enables you to report the costs as work in process. After the first revenue has been posted, you can calculate the cost of sales. If the calculated cost of sales is greater than the actual costs incurred to date, the system creates reserves for unrealized costs in the amount of the difference.
    No revenue is posted in CO for orders without reference to a sales order item. Each goods receipt for these orders is valuated. The work in process for these orders can be calculated with two different methods:
    Work in process at actual costs
    The actual costs for production orders and process orders for which no delivery has taken place are reported as work in process. After a partial delivery, the difference between the debit of the order with actual costs and the credit of the order from goods receipts is reported as work in process. When the order is complete, this work in process is canceled. The difference between the debit and credit of the order is then interpreted by the system as a variance.
    In Product Cost by Order, the work in process is usually valuated at actual costs.
    A requirement for the valuation of work in process at actual costs is that the default rule PP1 (full settlement) must be specified in the order.
    Work in process at target costs
    A confirmation is made for each operation or at certain reporting points. The system uses the confirmations to determine the quantity of work in process. This quantity is valuated using the strategy sequence specified in the valuation variant for work in process and scrap.
    In Product Cost by Period, the work in process is always valuated at target costs.
    A requirement for the valuation of work in process at target costs is that the default rule PP2 (periodic settlement) must be specified in the order.
    Hope it is clear.
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for