Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

Dear Gurus,
I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
billing through Settlement.
I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
Thanks,
Viswas Anantharangachar

Hi,
In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
Enjoy SAP….
Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
Namskar,
Ketan Dave

Similar Messages

  • No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.
    i am asking at the time of  WIP calculation or settlement
    cost can be settled but does not generated any accounting document .

  • Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

    Hi all
    I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
    1.  Create Result Analysis Keys
    2.  Define Result Analysis Versions
    3.  Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
    4.  Define LIne ID
    5.  Define Assignment for Result Analysis
    6.  Define update for Result Analsysis
    7.  Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
    We have RA connection with Projects
    After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values. 
    We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
    we need to fix that at high priority...
    your inputs are highly appreciated..
    Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
    best regards,
    S. Habib Pasha.

    Hi ,
    Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
    In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
    And what are the parameters you maintained in  Settelement Profile ?
    Thanks,
    Sai.

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Sales order item report based on results analysis key and status

    Hi,
    I am trying to find a a report to generate list of sales order items with following selection
            -invoicing status -invoiced/not invoices (other status)
            -result analysis key assigned to this item (VBAP-ABGRS)
            -system status /released/teco
    Basically i am CO consultant and not so familiar with the SD statuses. I tried VA05 and V.26 but all required selections are not available in these reports.
    If no standard report is available in ERP, i would like to have it in BI. Can some help me with table fields for statuses.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu
    Go to SE16 and give VBUK table and execute it there you can select the following feilds and then check wheather they are meeting your requirements or not.If they are meeting your requirements then create a new Z report by copying standard VA05 key feilds. and include the other feilds which you need.So you take your ABAP team help
    Billing status     FKSTK
    Posting Status  BUCHK
    Overall status  GBSTK
    Document category VBTYP
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Results Analysis splitting POCS (Revenue Surplus)

    I am not able to split POCS between two different GL Accounts.  I am able to do it with VLRV with two different Line ID's; but can't do it with POCS.
    On OKG2 Revenue surplus (POCS) is defined with cost element 982133.
    On OKG4 I split revenue by the following
    COArea  Vsn RAKEY (RVD) (E)  982284    " Revenue Domestic
    COArea  Vsn RAKEY (RVI) (E)  982285     " Revenue International
    On OKG5 I define the split of revenue accounts to RVD & RVI.
    Account 311*** = RVD
    Account 315*** = RVI
    On OKG8 I am able to split VLRV to different accounts using cost element 982284 & 982285.  I do not know how to define a split of POCS because it used the cost element 982133 from OKG2 and was not defined by my split in OKG4.
    My KKAI / KO88 Settlement works to split VLRV, but POCS goes to the same account.
    How can I split POCS value between two different accounts based on if the revenue was international or domestic (same as my split I used for VLRV)?

    Hi,
    RA categories POCS (Revenue surplus) is updated with an RA technical cost element customized in OKG2, not that from OKG4. As a result, when you specify in OKG8 a cost element different from that in OKG2, nothing is selected from settlement.
    If you need to distribute such RA categories as POCS between the RA lind IDs to post to different G/L accounts, you can use the solution of the Note 38070. Please, read this Note carefully.
    POCI and POCS is undated on the database under the respective RA technical cost elements defined in the definition of the RA version (transaction OKG2). The matter is that POCI and POCS cannot be distributed to RA line IDs in standard and, therefore, the customizing in OKG4 is not relevant for these RA categories. You have, however, the following workarounds.
    1. Use the user exit 4 (see the note 67793). In this case you    can assign two different technical RA cost elements for two different   RA keys and, consequently, two different FI posting rules (OKG8) to   settle to different G/L accounts for projects and internal orders.
    2. Use of the user exit 1 with the coding from the attached note 38070.   With this workaround POCI is updated as WIP on RA line IDs W00,   W=1, ... and POCS is updated as the reserves for unrealized costs   (RUCR) on these RA line IDs under the respective RA cost elements   defined in OKG4 for line IDs W00. W01....
    regards
    Waman

  • Results analysis Key determination in sales order

    Hi all,
    Im having a bit of an issue with our results analysis settlement and was wondering if you could help.
    How is the results analysis key determined in a sales order line item?
    Many thanks
    phil.

    Result analysis key is created by CO Consultant, and that result anlysis key will be assign in requirement classes.
    suppose created result anlysis key is 000004, this key will be assign in requirement class ( is make to order 040) Configuration.
    so there from key will be populated in sales order item. under the assignments teb page.
    i think this will be clarify u.
    Thanks
    Karne Nagaraju

  • Automatic Reversal of Result Analysis Posting

    Dear Experts,
    I would like to ask for suggestions in solving below case in my current project:
    1. Project is created for sales of power solutions. Most of them are long-term, thus cost-based revenue recognition method is applied.
    2. Result analysis with cost-based method (03) is periodically executed for project. Therefore, every month there are some revenue deferral/ accrual posting calculated based on actual cost - before the project is completely billed.
    3. It is expected for revenue deferral/ accrual posting resulted from result analysis to be automatically reversed immediately in the next period (e.g. if RA is executed for July 2014, reversal posting needs to be immediately posted with posting date Aug 1st, 2014).
    At first we were thinking to define new document type specifically for the result analysis posting, and perform mass reversal using F.80 transaction. But then we came to realize that result analysis entries are posted after settlement is executed -and accounting document generated from settlement transaction cannot be directly reversed in finance.
    Anyone has encountered the same issue? How do we reverse result analysis posting without reversing the whole settlement transaction?
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Analistia

    Hello,
    First you need to configure the functionality from the bellow path
    SPRO Financial AccountingGeneral Ledger Accounting Business Transaction  Manual Accruals  Basic Settings
    Once Engine configured Accrual document can be created through the easy access menu.
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Create Accrual Objects
    Execution of Accrual documents
    AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral LedgerPeriodic Processing   Manual Accruals  Start Periodic Run
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
    I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
    COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
    WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
    I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
    Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    Andy

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • Results Analysis on WIP

    Hi Guys,
    Do we carry out the Results Analysis to know the cost of the WIP at a particular point of time?
    What information does this Results Analysis yield and how do we use this information. Do we calculate the cost of WIP?
    And where do we settle these costs?
    Pls let me know about this concept of WIP and RA ??
    Thanks
    Kris..

    Hello Srikusap,
    WIP means work in progress suppose the production order is made up of 10 qty but at the time of confirmation of order only 8 qty is confirmed for production out of which 6 qty is confirmed as finished  nad 2 qty is still on production line to be completed , at the month end if this two qty is not decleared as finished then it will be considered under wip(work in process)
    RA is resault analysis in which the WIP is calculated.
    Hope this can help .
    Thnx

  • Accrual run and  revenue recog( time related revenue recognition)

    Hi All,
    Please let me know  what are the configuration steps required to  perform accrual run and  revenue recog( time related revenue recognition)  in R/3 when we do billing in CRM , for service contracts  with start date and end date  and billing plan - quarterly in advance
    Required scenario:
    Contract creation  in Crm
    Billing in CRM
    Accrual Run in R/3
    Revenue Recognition in R/3
    can  we  do with the help of result analysis key and internal order .
    Your valuable reply  awaited
    thanks
    SK
    Moderator: Thread locked due to cross posting.

    Hi
    Please refer the below mentioned link
    http://fuller.mit.edu/sb_support/media_lab/deferred_revenue_recog.htm
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-sd/intercompany-revenue-recognition-process-3042637
    It may help you
    Regards
    Praveen P C
    Edited by: Praveen Chirakkel on May 18, 2011 9:13 AM

  • Stastical Costs on WBS in result analysis

    Dear Gurus,
    At my client scenario, I am using valuated project stock. Normally in case of valuated project stock, actual cost does not get updated on WBS element at the time of good receipt from PO account assigned to WBS Element.
    But I referred SAP note 533207 to achieve actual cost on WBS Element.
    As per note, I have created cost element with category 90 for Balance sheet GL account (called at the time of good receipt).
    Due to this, at the time of goods receipt, statistical cost gets posted on WBS Element and seen as actual cost on WBS Element reports (This is solving our reporting requirement).
    But when I run result analysis (KKA2) on partiular WBS Element, system does not consider this actual cost (stastical cost posted on WBS Element).
    It seems system is not considering statistical costs on WBS Element in result analysis (KKA2).
    Is there any way to achieve this (consideration of stastical costs on WBS Element in result analysis)
    Thanks and Regards,
    Parimal

    Hi All,
    Thanks for your replies....I also appreciate that stastical cost can not be considered as actual cost in result analysis.
    But in case of valuated project stock, if stock is available for WBS Element and not issued to production order or any other receiver, under which category the value of WBS stock is to be shown in result analysis.
    Is there any other period end function to be carry out specifically for stock valuation or
    how to represent it in results of project period end procedures

  • Results analysis and settlement for projects with Sales Order

    Hi Costing Gurus,
    We are implementing SAP for ECO business in ECC 6.0 with SD, FICO and PS modules and we have contracting jobs which will run for longer periods. we are planning to POC method based on actual cost and Progress billing methods in projects. my understanding is that Reasults analysis will be used to calculate the WIP, Reserves, Losses etc.. however revenue has to be recognized using sales and distribution module with (SD-BIL-RR) component. How ever i have started testing this scenario in test system and i have couple of clarifications and seeking some help from experts to correct my understanding.
    i have below questions.
    1. KKA* . results analysis only calculates the amounts (WIP, reserves, losses etc.) or it can update the accounting.
    2. i found from the blogs and online documents FI posting only happens through settlement and it specifies the Profitability segemnt should be used as receiver in Project . is it madatory to use profitablty segemnt. as we are not implementing COPA can i use any other object and what would be the impact of it.
    currenty i have selected update RA key and i could find no FICO documents created with that.
    3. Do i need to use Revenue recognition in SD along RA in controlling to get my accrual posting for recenues. RA can only serve Cost part of the project or it can Revenue accrual also ?
    Seeking expert suggestion on this.
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hello Murali-
    To answer your questions,
    1. When you perform Results analysis, it does not post any accounting documents. Results analysis only does calcuation of WIP etc and when you do corresponding settlement like CO88(production order) or VA88 (sales order), it will post accounting entries.
    2. It is not mandatory to have profitability segment as a receiver. If you are using COPA, then you would need to settle it to COPA in the end. For example in case of make to order environment, sales order can be used as  a cost object and hence the receiver would be a sales order where all the costs would get settled.
    Hope this helps.
    Shail

  • Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

    Hi Experts
    My client has two company codes.
    CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
    As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
    In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
    With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
    And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration.  There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
    So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Update Result Analysis not allow for category E(Revenue)

    Hi,
    While defining update for Result Analysis for Sales Order Costing - Controlling Area -  RA Version - RA Key for WIP in Sales ORder - Line ID as Revenue - and category E(Revenue), put Secondary GL against  Cost/Revenue in tcode OKG4, system shows message as :
    Use only categories "A", "K", and "N" in WIP calculation
    Message no. KQ115
    Diagnosis
    In the valuation method, you chose WIP calculation as the results analysis type.
    Procedure
    For WIP calculation, you can only update costs ( category K), settled costs (category A), and costs not to be included (category N [revenue], for example).
    As a result while doing WIP on Sales order in tcode KKA3 system shows message as "No update of line IDs specified in CO area 0810 version 0 RA key 000004" in message no KJ208.
    Here RA KEY 000004 is used for WIP on Sales Order. We have defined 4 line ids which are assigned with RA Key for WIP on Actual Cost against category  K (Cost) for 3 line ids and 1 line is used with category A (Settled cost). Same way for RA key Sales Order I have to mention against category E (Revenue). But system does not allow me.
    Best Regards,
    Samat Roy

    Hi Dadoni,
    In OKG3 (Valuation Method) there are two different RA Keys I have maintained. RA Key 000002(WIP of Actual Cost) which is used with production order and RA Key 000004(Result Analysis for Sales Order) is maintained with Sales Order. Both the RA Keys have common status which are REL, DLV, PREL and TECO. Is it correct or wrong staus for Sales Order WIP ? Here status number area 1> PREL, 2> REL, 3> DLV and 4> TECO.
    Kindly tell me for RA Key 000004(WIP on Sales Order) you have mentioned only 3 status which are REL, TECO and FNBL. Is it necessary to maintained more status for Sales order WIP. What will be its status number and inside parameter setting from RA Type to other indicator setting ?
    Best Regards,
    Samrat

Maybe you are looking for