RHEL AS release 4 Up 5) 64 Bit Intel Xeon - Weblogic Platform 8.1 SP 6

Dear Sir,
We would like to know the Officially supported version of Jrockit for the following configuration.
OS :Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) 64bit
Intel X86 64bit Xeon Processors.
Weblogic Platform 8.1 SP6 .
Currently we are using
BEA JRockit - Java Version 1.4.2_10 Standard Edition build 1.4.2_10-b03
buidl R26.3.0-32_CR283061-63465-1.4.2_10-20060620-1808-linux-ia32
We need to takes advantage of the 64-bit extended addressing. At present JRockit JDK is running as a 32-bit application (using the x86 binary) though we have intel xeon 64 bit processors on 64 bit rhel 4 update 5.
Regards
Pramod Kumar
Mumbai.

What you are asking for is the latest version of the 32 bit JVM for Java 1.4 on Linux x86 - JRockit JVM R27.6.4.
(See here for the download)

Similar Messages

Install Oracle 9i (9.2.0.1 version) 32 bit on Windows 7 platform

Can Anybody tell me how to install Oracle 9i (9.2.0.1 version) 32 bit on Windows 7 platform?

user506051 wrote:
Can you tell me which Oracle version install on Windows 7 platform?11gR2 - when it is released next year.
In the mean time, some people have reported 11gR1 (the one for Windows Vista or 2008) to work - mostly somewhat.
I'm not quite sure I understand the urgency to get to Windiows 7 in view of the fact that it is unsupported and potentially inoperative. What I mean is that I don't understand the logic of getting to Windows 7 (or Fedora 12) as the latest and greatest operating system if it does not fully support the applications that are needed for the business (or the classroom).
Would you please help me understand ...

Installing Windows 7 (64 bit) in MacPro 2.6Ghz Intel Xeon - Impossible?

There is a list of machines on which Bootcamp apparently does not suport Windows 7 - and lucky me, having purchased my copy of 'ultimate' it looks as if mine is one of them.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3986
According to the list "*Mac Pro (Mid 2006, Intel Xeon Dual-core 2.66GHz or 3GHz)* " is not supported - now mine is mid 2007, not 2006, but it isn't clear whatis meant there - but I'm thinking it probably means from mid 2006 until the end of production of the 2.66Ghz Intel Xeon Dual-core model. Correct?
But, has anyone managed to get Windows 7 onto one of these, with or without BootCamp - if so, how?
When I use bootcamp, put the 64 bit disc in the drive, it then gets as far as trying to boot from the DVD, and gives a message:
1
2
*Select CD-ROM Boot Type:_*
at this point the keyboard (as supplied with the Mac Pro, apparently important) does not work, nor does a PC format keyboard, so there is apparently no way to select an option, and I wouldn't know which of 1 or 2 was the correct boot type anyhow. The disk sticks and can only be ejected by pulling it out of the casework and pressing the usually concealed button on the drive.
Any pearls of wisdom gratefully received - or do I need a newer Mac Pro for W7?
Thanks. Stephen.

I'm experiencing exactly the same. Found some articles about re-burning the DVD but it hasn't helped.
My suspicion is that the BIOS (or mac equivalent) does not support booting 64bit OS. I remember trying to force OSX Leopard to boot 64bit and it wouldn't work. I can't recall the exact issue, but I suspect its similar.
I am installing Windows 7 Ultimate x64 in a Fusion VM - but not bootcamp - just a regular old VM. So far that is fine. Its not done yet but it is loading.
It may be as simple as a BIOS update - but as far as I know - there are none for my Xeon 3GhZ based system.
oh well.

Oracle installation on Windows 64 bit with Intel Xeon

Hi!
we have Windows Enterprise Server SP2 64 bit with Intel Xeon processor and would like to install the SOLMAN with Oracle.
According to the original Oracle-DVD from SAP there are only three possible choise entries:
a) AMD64
b) IA64
c) I386
But I have the feeeling it should be one choice like "x86" is not?
Which one should we apply?
The I386 can be installed indeed, but we are getting the error during the SAPINST-Installation "Oracle software not installed". I thought this entry was only for 32 bit?
The IA63 Bit can not be installed.
Only the AMD64 we could install. But the question is, whether AMD is the same to Intel Xeon?
Thank you very much for any useful help/comments...
regards

> Hi!
>
> we have Windows Enterprise Server SP2 64 bit
> with Intel Xeon processor and would like to
> install the SOLMAN with Oracle.
>
> According to the original Oracle-DVD from SAP there
> are only three possible choise entries:
> a) AMD64
> b) IA64
> c) I386
AMD64 is the correct one.
IA64 is "Intel Itanium-2"
I386 is generic "Intel Pentium (32bit)"
AMD64 is the generic term for processors supporting EM64T (Intel) or AMD Opteron
Markus

Windows 7 64 Bit, Intel Core i7, Photoshop CS4

I just had a new computer built with Windows 7 64 Bit, Intel Core i7 and an nVidia GT240 Card....I am unable to view my "Libraries" in the Bridge...I only get "no files to view". If nothing else my Documents, Pictures and Music should be showing. I have all patches, updates installed for the computer, Photoshop, and my printer. Also when I click on Print Preview in the printer dialogue box (Epson R2400) I get an error msg stating that the "Display Driver shut down and has restarted successfully" When this occurs, my screen goes blank for a moment then starts up with an all white screen until the print preview finally appears. Any help? On the printer issue, Epson simply says to insure the drivers are up to date, which they all are. I've uninstalled and re installed everything a few times to no avail.

Thank you!!
In a message dated 3/13/2010 4:59:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
We are seeing a similar problem on our Win7 / i7 workstations. So far
there hasn't been a cure for it, but I'm convinced the current Nvidia display
drivers are bad.
For instance I also had to turn off the GPU support in Photoshop on Vista
x64 workstations just to see 16 bit color files. Since this is a new
problem, all this suggests to me that the Nvidia drivers and PS not working well
together. I've started to install other diriver versions in an attempt to
sort this out.

Fileshare between my Mac Pro Quad Core Intel Xeon (64-bit) & Power Mac 9600

I want to make my Power Macintosh 9600/233 (Mac OS 9) a shared computer with my Mac Pro Quad Core Intel Xeon (64-bit)(Mac OS 10.6.6). I am using a Netopia Model 3346N-VGx DSL Ethernet Managed Switch to network with my Samsung printer and the Mac Book Pro.
I also have a Power PC G4 (Mac OS 10.5.8) connected (via a Ziplinq 48" Retractable Crossover Network Cable) to a Farallon EtherWave 10 Base-T AAUI Transceiver, which in turn is connected to the Netopia, from which I can share files. All of this is ethernet connectivity.
I thought I could connect my 9600 using the same method as for the G4 or by connecting the ethernet cable from the 9600 directly into the Mac Pro Quad Core. However, neither of these methods work.
An additional stumbling block is that I have not used this 9600 for several years and am not sure of its account name. I'm fairly certain of its password. But because I don't have a second monitor for this machine, I can't muddle my way in.
My questions:
1. What might be a network solution to this dilemma?
2. Or, do I need to get another monitor for this computer and leave it un-networked and just transfer files manually?
3. Or, would whatever hard drives are in the 9600 be transferable into the networked G4 or the main Mac Pro? (not sure what they are.)
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.

Oh man, what a dilemma...
1. What might be a network solution to this dilemma?
Without a monitor on the 9600, almost none. At the very least you'll need to configure the server with appropriate network settings for your environment, and that can't be done headless.
You might only need a display for long enough to setup the network, but you'll need one all the same.
Once the network is configured your options are either AFP or FTP, but I'm not even sure the old version of AFP is supported anymore, which means you may need to fire up an FTP client on the 9600 and push the files to your MacPro.
2. Or, do I need to get another monitor for this computer and leave it un-networked and just transfer files manually?
As mentioned above, you're going to need a monitor at the very least to configure the network settings. I'd be inclined to say at that point you might as well copy the files off any way you can and put the 9600 to rest. If you're really, really fortunate and the 9600 has a CD burner I'd probably use that and count myself lucky
3. Or, would whatever hard drives are in the 9600 be transferable into the networked G4 or the main Mac Pro? (not sure what they are.)
The 9600 shipped with SCSI drives, which no current Mac support (at least without a SCSI card), so there's no way to remove the drive from the 9600 and attach it directly to the MacPro.

ILearning release 5 in Oracle10gAS 10.1.2.0.2 Platform

Hi,
I wanted to know if anyone installed iLearning release 5 in Oracle10gAS 10.1.2.0.2 Platform successfully in OS RedHat Linux.
I didn't see any Oracle certification for this combination
Thanks & Best Regards
Guna

Oracle iLearning 5.0 is not yet certified on 10.1.2 of iAS. Currently, it is only certified on iAS 9.0.4
We have plans to certify on 10.1.2 but not ETA yet.
Scott

Intel Xeon Windows 64 Bit : Which Oracle software Version?

Hi!
we have Windows Enterprise Server SP2 64 bit with Intel Xeon processor and would like to install the SOLMAN with Oracle.
According to the original Oracle-DVD from SAP there are only three possible choise entries:
a) AMD64
b) IA64
c) I386
But I have the feeeling it should be one choice like "x86" is not?
Which one should we apply?
The I386 can be installed indeed, but we are getting the error during the SAPINST-Installation "Oracle software not installed". I thought this entry was only for 32 bit?
The IA63 Bit can not be installed.
Only the AMD64 we could install. But the question is, whether AMD is the same to Intel Xeon?
Thank you very much for any useful help/comments...
regards

Hi,
You have still a "32-bit" platform ONLY.
1. Intel 64 is not AMD64, they are different. AMD64 implementation is only meant for AMD processors although the family is 64T support, full implementation is NOT done.
2. Your assumption of x86 is correct. You MUST go for I386 option ONLY !!!
3. Error of "Oracle software not installed" is different and you should not relate it to hardware. It is only for the environment variables and registry.. This will happen even in normal case..
Once again, you should NOT use AMD64 and IA64.. Try only with I386 option..
BTW, firstly, whats the reason for you to choose a 64-bit o/s that are meant for 64 - bit Itanium systems... CHoose a operating system that fits and will work with SAP optimally!
You should only choose a 32 Bit Enterprise edition of operating system. Windows Server 2003 R2 well works in your case and should be your choice !!
Finally your combination should be -
1. Windows 32 Bit Enterprise Edition R2 ---> O/s
2. i386 DVD -
> SAP/ Oracle DB
Hope this helps, revert for queries
Cheers,
Senthil

JDK 1.4.2 for Intel Xeon 64 bit

Gurus,
I am installing ECC 6.0 on Windows.
I am unable to download the JDK 1.4.2* for Intel xeon processors on 64 bit running Windows Server x64 standard edition.
Been to the site http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/SAPsite/download.html, to download JDK, but unable to logon because of some authentication issues. Is there a different location or JDK version that can be used for installation.
Regards
Abdul

Hi,
I have the same problem, I must install J2SE on a brand new server with Intel XEON L5520 CPUs.
It's NOT possible to install the current J2SE version from http://www.sun.com/software/javaforbusiness/sap_download.jsp,
because it's for AMDx64.
But under http://java.sun.com/products/archive you can find an older version "j2sdk-1_4_2_19-windows-i586-p",
it is possible to install this version ( you must register to download ).
I find no other way at the moment.
With regards,
Michael

Need oracle 64 bit Licensed version weblogic 10.3.0.0

please help me to direct a point of contact to download 64 bit Licensed version weblogic 10.3.0.0

Hi NZL,
As the Weblogic version 10.3.0.0 is not available in OTN or edelivery so request you to open a Service Request so that shipment team will provide FTP link so that it could be downloaded.
Also please refer to the note:Error Correction Support Dates for Oracle WebLogic Server (Doc ID 950131.1)
Regards,
Prakash.

JDK 1.4.2 version for Windows Server 2003/x64 on Intel Xeon 64 bit processo

Hi,
I'm currently installing a SAP Netweaver Server on a Windows Server 2003/X64 (Intel Xeon CPUs).
The server requires a JDK 64 bit with minimum version 1.4.2_09. Version 1.5.0_00 and higher are not supported by SAP.
I have searched on the J2SE 1.4.2 download page and I haven't found any windows 64 bit except for Itanium processors.
SAP mention clearly on its web portal that it supports Windows Server 2003/X64 64bit with Sun JSE 1.4.2 64 bit.
Any help?
Thanks,
adaif

Hello,
I ran into the same problem searching for the 1.4.2 JDK for Windows x64 platform and found this discussion post. It was helpful!
Could you tell me where to download the JCE policy files from? Do they need to match the same JDK version (1.4.2)?
The Install Guide for SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SR3 Java on Windows MS SQL Server says to download the JCE policy files for your platform (Windows x64) from http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads. But I could only find jce_policy-6.zip. Is that the right JCE policy files for Windows 2003 x64 64bit platform for SUN JSE 1.4.2 64bit?
Thanks,
Asif

10.6 on 32 bit intels?

Can't seem to find it, but any one know if Snow Leopard will install and run ok on 32 bit intel core duo MacBook Pros?

HI,
Check the 4th paragraph here. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/06/08macosx.html
General requirements left side of page here. http://www.apple.com/macosx/specs.html
Carolyn

Lenovo X130e Windows 8.1 64-bit Intel HD graphics drivers

There is only a Windows 7 32-bit graphics drivers on the Lenovo support website. This has forced me to install the generic Intel HD graphics drivers which has an issue with brightness control when I upgraded to Windows 8.1 64-bit. Will Lenovo ever make a Windows 8.1 64 bit Intel HD graphics driver for Lenovo X130e?
Thanks in advance.

This one says 64bits: Intel HD Graphics Driver
Revision : 01
Software name Intel HD Graphics Driver
Support models ThinkPad Edge E120
ThinkPad Edge E320
ThinkPad L420, L421
ThinkPad L520
ThinkPad X121e, X130e
Operating Systems Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit
Microsoft Windows Vista 64-bit
Refer to marketing materials to find out what computer models
support which Operating Systems.
Versions 8.15.10.2827 (Package)
- 8.15.10.2827 (Graphics Driver)
- 6.14.00.3086 (Display Audio Driver)
Support devices Intel HD Graphics Device
Intel Display Audio
/L40SX/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E/A20p/A22p
A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T4x0x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/10*X2xx/2*X200T/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Comunidad en Español English Community Deutsche Community Русскоязычное Сообщество

Need Win-7 (32 bit) Intel HD Graphics driver for HP 14-d008tu Notebook

I have got the driver of Intel HD Graphics for Win-7 (64 bit) and now the HP Support and Drivers!
BUt I need display driver for Win-7 (32 bit).
Please let me know how can I get this driver?
if you need more description, then pleae let me know.
Thanks.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi:
This 32 bit Intel graphics driver should work...
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=23884&lang=eng&ProdId=3719

32-bit Intel Core Duo ok with upcoming 64-bit Leopard?

How well suited is the 32-bit Intel Core Duo in my MacBook Pro to run the future 64-bit Leopard OS? What would be the compromises?
Should I sell my Core Duo now while I can (maybe...) and upgrade to the 64-bit Core2 Duo. Would a 32-bit chip such as the Core Duo struggle to operate efficiently - or at least as fast as it does under 32-bit Tiger - when run within the 64-bit Leopard OS?
Cheers
Ant

You might find this tidibit (from AnandTech) )interesting, Kappy:
"Why a 64-bit mode can actually be slower than a 32-bit counterpart
If all else is equal, a 64-bit MPU will be slower than its 32-bit equivalent. A study conducted by DEC found that, on average, compiling for 64bit programs decreases performance by 5%. This is because 64-bit address pointers occupy more space, resulting in higher data cache miss rates. In fact, 64-bit ISAs still support 64-bit addressing and 32-bit data operands, specifically to keep code size down and the miss rate penalty to a minimum; thus 32-bit integer data is still going to be used when the larger range of 64-bit integers are not needed.
What good is 64-bit computing?
There is one good use for 64-bit integer arithmetic: 64-bit flat memory addressing. Offering memory addressing beyond 4GB, 64-bit addressing needs 64-bit general purpose registers and 64-bit integer arithmetic for memory pointer calculations. This obviously has no effect on 32-bit vs. 64-bit performance, since 64-bit memory addressing on a 32-bit processor is a moot point."
So it's not clear that going 64-bit, in and of itself, would yield any improvement in performance; it may well be worse in some cases (and your analogy might well be true, depending on the cache algorhythms and efficiency).
Certainly if one processor has a wider memory bus than another, then the first processor should, all else being equal, outperform the second processor. I can't find specs on the memory fetch for the Core Duo and the Core 2 Duo, so I can't say whether or not they differ. The PowerPC G5 processor actually has a 128-bit wide memory fetch (64-bit in and 64-bit out) though it's classified as a "64-bit processor" (based on it's memory address space, I would presume).
So, as you allude, one has to be careful making performance estimates just based on a desciption of a processor being "32 bit" or "64 bit". We'll have to wait to see reasonable benchmarks between the Core Duo and the Core 2 Duo running a 64-bit OS before we'll really know what advantage, if any, there is.
Cheers.
Message was edited by: Dave Sawyer

RHEL AS release 4 Up 5) 64 Bit Intel Xeon - Weblogic Platform 8.1 SP 6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for