Routing issue ASA5510 and CCME

Hello community.
I have issues with ccme voice vlan, it is invisible(i cant ping 192.168.2.1) from root ASA.
So i have 192.168.0.1 as data vlan (1) and 192.168.2.1 as voice vlan , voice vlan used on root switch and connected to ASA but voice vlan invisible from asa5510.
on ccme it looks like:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.2
description Voice
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
everything else working fine.

There is not enough information here for us to be able to identify the problem. At minimum you need to post the relevant parts of the ASA config and to provide information about the connection between ccme and ASA.
HTH
Rick

Similar Messages

Apple TV Buffering and 2.4GHz router issues

Hi,
When I set m y router to 2.4GHz I have to wait forever to buffer movies that I have on home sharing on my ATV, I can switch my router to 5GHz and movies don't need any loading time - they play straight away. Now the problem I have with this is that having my router set to 5GHz means that I lose wifi connection on my iphone.
Does anybody have any suggestions as to why the 2.4GHz setting is so slow? Can I get around this issue?
Thanks very much

We've posted some tips related to this matter on this link to Apple TV
The tips are located toward the bottom of the page.
The information likely won't help everyone but it will answer some questions.
Per Apple policy, we want you to know we might benefit from your visit to our free information or even profit.
We hope you find the information and video(s) useful.

Routing Issue with 2 Nics on Windows Server 2008 R2

Good Day
My issue is I needed to set up port forwarding for a web server to communicate with our hotels management server to check availability.
Initially the server has a single Nic configured in the 172.26.1.0 /24 network , Its default gateway the Switch vlan interface 172.26.1.1
We have many vlans for all the systems in the hotel and the server also needs to communicate with 3 other servers on different subnets which it does just fine.
I now added an additional adsl line with a managed router which has an interface of 192.168.10.1 /24 , My servers second NIC has the IP address 192.168.10.2 with its gateway being the 192.168.10.1
This 192.168.10.0 network is in a L2 Vlan and the rest of the network does not know it exists. It was working fine then just stopped asfter i added a static route to the server , which i did with RRas... I did this as the server could not communicate with
just one of the servers..
If i disable the 172.26.1.0 NIC the port forwarding works but then obviously the rest of the network goes down.. I know its a routing issue but am lost
please help

Hello,
using multiple default gateways is not a good idea.
See details in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/159168/en-us
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

Routing Issue with Telia

I think verizon has a routing issue with Telia.

thought I would share this, Telia has admited an issue on their network
Twitter / Telia_service: @Ungvall routing problem? This ...
https://twitter.com/Telia_service/status/179661595276881921
Cached
Similar
Share
View shared post
BTW Apparently @Telia_service had routing problems on both the latest iOS and ... DNS problem and we are working with Akamai for a sollution to this problem

Routing Issue with 3550

I am having a routing issue with a 3550 switch. I have 5 vlans and I need one of the vlans to access a different router based on destination IP rather than our edge router. I have entered a static route on the 3550 that points to the secondary router whenever a certain network is tried to be accessed. My problem is I can't seem to get the traffic to flow correctly. When I trace route an address on the Internet the path shows as expected, the 3550 then my firewall then my edge router. When I trace an address that is on the other side of the secondary router I get the 3550 as the first hop, then nothing. I can ping the address so I know the path is up. What could be the issue? Thanks in advance.

Hello,
in addition to Mahmood´s post, what do you have defined as the next hop for the default route to the secondary router ? If you use an interface on the 3550 as the next hop, make sure that whatever is connected is in the same subnet, otherwise use the IP address of the next hop. So, let´s say your remote network is 192.168.1.0, and the secondary router is connected to FastEthernet0/1, your default route should look like this if the secondary router is in the same subnet (in this example, the IP address of the secondary router would be 172.16.1.2):
interface FastEthernet0/1
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 FastEthernet0/0
Otherwise, try:
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.2
where 172.16.1.2 would be the address of the secondary router.
Does that make sense ?
Regards,
GNT

Problem of routing between inside and outside on ASA5505

I have a ASA5505 with mostly factory default configuration. Its license allows only two vlan interfaces (vlan 1 and vlan 2). The default config has interface vlan 1 as inside (security level 100), and interface vlan 2 as outside (security level 0 and using DHCP).
I only changed interface vlan 1 to IP 10.10.10.1/24. After I plugged in a few hosts to vlan 1 ports and connect port Ethernet0/0 (default in vlan 2) to a live network, here are a couple of issues I found:
a) One host I plugged in is a PC, and another host is a WAAS WAE device. Both are in vlan 1 ports. I hard coded their IP to 10.10.10.250 and 10.10.10.101, /24 subnet mask, and gateway of 10.10.10.1. I can ping from the PC to WAE but not from WAE to the PC, although the WAE has 10.10.10.250 in its ARP table. They are in the same vlan and same subnet, how could it be? Here are the ping and WAE ARP table.
WAE#ping 10.10.10.250
PING 10.10.10.250 (10.10.10.250) from 10.10.10.101 : 56(84) bytes of data.
--- 10.10.10.250 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
WAE#sh arp
Protocol Address Flags Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.10.10.250 Adj 00:1E:37:84:C9:CE ARPA GigabitEthernet1/0
Internet 10.10.10.10 Adj 00:14:5E:85:50:01 ARPA GigabitEthernet1/0
Internet 10.10.10.1 Adj 00:1E:F7:7F:6E:7E ARPA GigabitEthernet1/0
b) None of the hosts in vlan 1 in 10.10.10.0/24 can ping interface vlan 2 (address in 172.26.18.0/24 obtained via DHCP). But on ASA routing table, it has both 10.10.10.0/24 and 172.26.18.0/24, and also a default route learned via DHCP. Is ASA able to route between vlan 1 and vlan 2? (inside and outside). Any changes I can try?
Here are ASA routing table and config of vlan 1 and vlan 2 (mostly its default).
ASA# sh route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 172.26.18.1 to network 0.0.0.0
C 172.26.18.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, outside
C 127.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 is directly connected, _internal_loopback
C 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, inside
d* 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 172.26.18.1, outside
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address dhcp setroute
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
All other ports are in vlan 1 by default.

I should have made the config easier to read. So here is what's on the ASA and the problems I have. The ASA only allows two VLAN interfaces configured (default to Int VLAN 1 - nameif inside, and Int VLAN 2 - nameif outside)
port 0: in VLAN 2 (outside). DHCP configured. VLAN 2 pulled IP in 172.26.18.0/24, default gateway 172.26.18.1
port 1-7: in VLAN 1 (inside). VLAN 1 IP is 10.10.10.1. I set all devices IP in VLAN 1 to 10.10.10.0/24, default gateway 10.10.10.1
I have one PC in port 1 and one WAE device in port 2. PC IP set to 10.10.10.250 and WAE set to 10.10.10.101. PC can ping WAE but WAE can't ping PC. Both can ping default gateway.
If I can't ping from inside interface to outside interface on ASA, how can I verify inside hosts can get to outside addresses and vise versa? I looked at ASA docs, but didn't find out how to set the routing between inside and outside. They are both connected interfaces, should they route between each other already?
Thanks a lot

FIOS not good ISP for gaming in North East, bad routing to canada and west coast.

http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Keep-getting-kicked-out-of-game-MechWarrior-Online/m-p/66...
Yes the same thing has been happening to me. It also appears it was a problem back in january according to this thread....
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Routing-Latency-issues/m-p/525091/highlight/true#M34574
Here is a past MWO thread started at the same time by a verizon customer. I believe almost all of thise users have quit fios or quit MWO.
http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/91680-higher-ping-times-after-patch/page__st__80
Many people in the game believe its due to MWO patches, but I think thats just a placebo. I believe it is to do with the cold winter months and verizon not being able to handle the load. Speedtests to any west coast, specifically vancouver server, have the same results.
I have called verizon, gone to live chat, spoken to many different supervisors and technicians and have gotten no help with this issue. They basically tell me its not their problem.
After doing many traceroutes and speedtests. It appears I am getting routed through europe to get to canada from NY, which just doesn't make any common sense. First verizon claims the link router sending us to europe is not owned by them. Then we have to prove to them that it in fact is with public business records and WHOIS reports. Which also seemed to be the case for others in that thread back in january.
IT seems the issue in january might of been that particular router was geting overloaded they might have fixed the circuit on that verizon link/border router in question. But now it seems the issue has been passed up the line to the next link router and now that next circuit up the line is getting congested.
Below you can see some traceroutes when I am receiving the bad ping:
Tracing route to relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 9 ms 10 ms 5 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-175.verizon-gni.net [71.167.34.1]
3 11 ms 12 ms 7 ms G0-1-3-7.NYCMNY-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.220]
4 94 ms 12 ms 10 ms ae0-0.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.110]
5 9 ms 15 ms 12 ms 0.so-4-0-1.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.29]
6 9 ms 16 ms 11 ms TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.65]
7 28 ms 25 ms 44 ms tinet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.122] (previous congested router routing to europe)
8 38 ms 39 ms 39 ms xe-8-2-0.tor10.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.107.98]
9 100 ms 104 ms 103 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94]
10 97 ms 99 ms 98 ms border1.te7-1-bbnet1.tor001.pnap.net [70.42.24.132]
11 103 ms 103 ms 96 ms relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
Trace complete.
1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 8 ms 10 ms 10 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-175.verizon-gni.net [71.167.34.1]
3 15 ms 15 ms 12 ms 130.81.185.220
4 25 ms 84 ms 12 ms ae0-0.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.110]
5 22 ms 21 ms 10 ms 0.so-4-0-1.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.29]
6 18 ms 16 ms 19 ms TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.133
7 35 ms 33 ms 34 ms tinet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.122]
8 56 ms 54 ms 55 ms xe-8-2-0.tor10.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.107.98]
9 118 ms 119 ms 112 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94]
10 111 ms 111 ms 109 ms border1.te7-1-bbnet1.tor001.pnap.net [70.42.24.132]
11 116 ms 111 ms 109 ms relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
Here are some traceroutes when I am getting the good ping:
Tracing route to relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 10 ms 5 ms 8 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-175.verizon-gni.net [71.167.34
.1]
3 11 ms 13 ms 10 ms G0-1-3-7.NYCMNY-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.220]
4 48 ms 11 ms 10 ms ae0-0.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.110]
5 83 ms 30 ms 33 ms 0.so-4-0-1.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.29]
6 19 ms 12 ms 23 ms TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.125]
7 14 ms 12 ms 15 ms tinet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.122]
8 29 ms 26 ms 28 ms xe-8-2-0.tor10.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.107.98]
9 33 ms 34 ms 34 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94]
10 36 ms 40 ms 44 ms border1.te7-1-bbnet1.tor001.pnap.net [70.42.24.132]
11 38 ms 40 ms 39 ms relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
Trace complete.
1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 6 ms 11 ms 6 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-175.verizon-gni.net [71.167.34.1]
3 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms 130.81.185.220
4 88 ms 9 ms 11 ms ae0-0.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.110]
5 8 ms 11 ms 11 ms 0.so-4-0-1.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.29]
6 14 ms 21 ms 11 ms TenGigE0-7-0-4.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.25.226]
7 14 ms 10 ms 10 ms tinet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.122]
8 26 ms 29 ms 28 ms xe-8-2-0.tor10.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.107.98]
9 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94]
10 39 ms 39 ms 40 ms border1.te7-1-bbnet1.tor001.pnap.net [70.42.24.1
32]
11 38 ms 39 ms 39 ms relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
Going from 20 ping to 100 depending on time of day, which seems to 24 hours a day now! is a real tease and frustrating, and when there is packet loss or excessive spikes, thats when we lose the connection, session lost messages, black screen issue...etc...
When reading that past thread, The problem server back in january was tinet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.122] (the one that routes us through europ) but now it seems the burden has been passed up the chain to the next link/border router and circuit internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94].
Maybe the guys back in january were able to pressure verizon to increase bandwidth on the tinet circuit on tha verizon router in NY because they actually owned that server, even though they originally tried to lie and claim they didn't. Even if not part of FIOS, and after the 6th hop. Its obvious it was theirs cause it ends with alter.net, was right here in NYC, WHOIS reports gave verizons email, and business records show they bought it in 2006.
Fios doesn't contact DSL, residential doesn't contact business...etc.. Its like this company doesn't remember how 9/11 happened!!!
BUt Now the burden is on the the next link router which routes to internap. And that is a german server and part of tinet.net and is a different company that verizon does not have direct access to. Verizon would not even email the admin for me, which many feel is unprofessional.
You can try emailing that admin yourself or doing some trace routes your self and calling and pressuring verizon to address the issue themselves.
It seems verizon fios can't handle routing people to canada, especially in the cold months of the year. They must not be able to handle their load. It seems verizon fios is really a scam, and fiber optics is just a pretty name, but in reality is no different then any other network, except locally. The only difference we need to look at when buying bandwidth, is pricing period. The fact it is fiber optics means diddly squat! And the more people that get fios, i predict the worse their network is going to get.
I have sent an email to the admin of that german server {edited for privacy} but I would be shocked if I got any reply. Ridiculous for verizon to suggest I do that in the first place.
People with timer warner in the same area are getting constant 20-40 ping to MWO, while verizon fios customers are getting terrible connections right now.

What you are seeing here has nothing at all to do with what your speed is. Latency has nothing to do with speed, it has to do with distance and network congestion. Your local ISP, no matter who it is, can not directly affect how another company (in your case Internap Network Services Corporation) routes data. Now if there was a problem in a link directly connected to your local ISP, for example:
4 94 ms 12 ms 10 ms ae0-0.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.110]
5 9 ms 15 ms 12 ms 0.so-4-0-1.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.29]
*from your tracert
The above link is leaving Verizon local control and entering Alter.Net control, if there was latency on a regular basis there then this should be reported to Verizon as your local ISP and that will filter up to their NOC group who will contact Alter.net and figure out the issue with that link. If the issue is a faulty link it will get fixed, if the issue is a link undergoing to much traffic its ability to handle the traffic will either be increased where possible or routed around where possible. The whole issue of peer-to-peer networking is very complex (which is what the Supreme Court was reviewing by the way) and a number of issues come into play. If the connection point only experiences high traffic sometimes on a very limited basis then generally routing some traffic to different connections is what is done.
Now in your later postes you show the following:
8 38 ms 39 ms 39 ms xe-8-2-0.tor10.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.107.98]
9 100 ms 104 ms 103 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.94]
10 97 ms 99 ms 98 ms border1.te7-1-bbnet1.tor001.pnap.net [70.42.24.132]
11 103 ms 103 ms 96 ms relay-1.mwtactics.com [70.42.29.65]
That clearly shows the problem is inside the tinet.net (Internap Network Services Corporation) network. This network is also the network providing the link into this game server. What does this tell us? From what you are seeing it tells us that either Internap does not have enough bandwidth to server the amount of traffic down to this server or the game company has not purchased a high enough link. The latter is unlikely. Most likely the issue is that Verizon's Fios product is growing with more and more people are trying to reach that game from the Fios network. This causes issues at the link point, which Verizon apparently has taken steps to fix as well as those internal links going down to the game servers. Now your local ISP (Verizon) cannot help the latter half of that. One can hope the end user ISP (in your case Internap Network Services Corporation) will increase their internal bandwidth or router traffic around problem areas.

No airtunes with pppoE due to routing issues?

I just switched to an optical fiber to the home internet connection (which is getting pretty popular here in Japan). Needless to say, the network is very fast, however, I can no longer use airtunes via my airport express network. The airport express stations (both of them) no longer show up in iTunes. My guess is that this is due to a routing issue and the same problem must have been encountered by others before and hopefully solved. The new internet connection uses pppoE to make a connection to the internet service provider. This gives me an internet address of the form 125.197.xx.yy. I still have my airport express set to get an address via dhcp (which the new optical fiber hub provides) and is of the typical private network form 192.168.1.4. When I am connected by pppoE to the internet, my iTunes cannot see my airport express due to routing issues I assume. Is there an elegant solution to this -- can I use my airtunes and the internet at the same time? Would modifying the internet routing help here (I have used this before when I have had multiple interfaces going (e.g. one in a secure local lan and the other supporting an internet connection via ssh to the outside world). Any advise would be much appreciated. I haven't tried asking my airport express to log in via pppoE -- is this the only solution?

Well as I have for my last several posts -- I solved the problem myself. I am pretty sure that the root cause was a routing problem (pretty obvious in fact). By have the airport express base station connect via pppoE itself (I have a remote relay airport express as well) and switching to NAT and DHCP distribution of addresses via the airport express, I can both see my airtunes as well as my ethernet connection. It is a non-ideal solution as I have a fixed IP which would have been convenient to log in from outside to, but I guess I can live with that.

Change goods Issue date and delivery date

while crating Sales document through VA01
i want to replace goods issue date (VBEP-WADAT ) with my Z calender date.
so that delivery date(ETDAT) aslo should chaged automatically ( bcz iof the change in goods isuue date ).
how to achive this ?
i tryied in Program    program of MV45AFZZ/ MV45AFZB in the User Exists mentioned below:
1.     Form Userexit_Check_VBEP
2.     Form userexit_move_field_to_vbep
i was able to change goods issue date (VBEP-WADAT ) but not refleting in output screen,..
regards,
ramesh

Hi Venkat,
Even it did not update in my user exit when I update from VBEP-WADAT. So, I did back calculation (considering route lead time) and updated Delivery date field VBEP-EDATU. It is simple. I have given the sample code as below.
   if lines( xvbap[] ) = 1 and VBEP-ETENR = '0001' and            "Calculate RDD while the first line item entered
     vbap-route <> space and <<your GI date>> is not initial.    "Only when header RSD is filled
      select single TRAZTD into ws_traztd from tvro
            where route = vbap-route.
      ws_days = ws_traztd / 24 / 10000.
      if ws_days <> 0.    "Only when Transp. Lead time is maintained ( So, will not affect other entities )
         select single FABKL into ws_fabkl from T001W
            where WERKS = vbap-werks.
         CALL FUNCTION 'WDKAL_DATE_ADD_FKDAYS'       "Calculate as per Factory calender
             EXPORTING
               i_date        = <<your GI date>>
               i_fkday       = ws_days
               i_fabkl       = ws_fabkl
             IMPORTING
               E_DATE        = ws_date
              E_FKDAY       =
             EXCEPTIONS
                ERROR         = 1
                OTHERS        = 2
         IF sy-subrc = 0.
            VBEP-EDATU = vbak-vdatu.   "copy to the first line item
         ENDIF.
      endif.
    endif.    "Route days

Audio tracks playing different audio tracks - routing issue?

I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!

Chris Joye wrote:
I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!
Check the parameters, in the left side of the arrange page window.
To me, it sounds as if you have a bunch of arrange tracks, which are all playing back through audio track #1.
Cheers

IB Routing issue. Unable to find routing to the corresponding incoming msg

Hi All,
We are facing a Routing issue. The flow of message across the DB is given below.
1) Message will be triggered from 3rd party application to PeopleSoft portal with Service Operation A
2) From portal one more service operation B will be invoked to communicate with CRM
Both the service operations are synchronous. I have tested the Service operation in CRM and I am able to get the results. But in Portal if I test, I am getting the error like
+"Unable to find routing corresponding to the incoming request message"+
I have checked the routing alias name between Portal and CRM data bases and Its same.
could you please give us a clue to debug this further?
Thanks,
Hari.A

You should check which permission list the service operation is attached to, and check if the user has been granted to, Something like the following from the backend :
SELECT   distinct c.roleuser
FROM     psclassdefn a, psroleclass b, psroleuser c
WHERE    a.classid = b.classid
AND      b.rolename = c.rolename
AND      a.classid = '<permission_list>' If nothing is returned for your user, then you could created a new role and give it to the user.
Also, since you are on Peopletools 8.52, all this configuration settings can be done through Integration Network WorkCenter. I wrote articles about that (and you can find something about permission list for a given service operation as well) :
http://gasparotto.blogspot.nl/2012/11/peopletools-852-integration-network.html
Nicolas.

I upgraded my iPAD 1 and now it will not connect to my wi-fi. It does not ask for password. It does recognize wi-fi name. I have rebooted, unplugged router, 'forget network', and reset network. Still will not connect.

I have no idea what to try next. Please help!

Some things to try first:
1. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
2. Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
3. Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
4. Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
5. Renew IP Address: (especially if you are droping internet connection)
    •    Launch Settings app
    •    Tap on Wi-Fi
    •    Tap on the blue arrow of the Wi-Fi network that you connect to from the list
    •    In the window that opens, tap on the Renew Lease button
6. Potential Quick Fixes When Your iPad Won’t Connect to Your Wifi Network
http://ipadinsight.com/ipad-tips-tricks/potential-quick-fixes-when-your-ipad-won t-connect-to-your-wifi-network/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
iOS 6 Wifi Problems/Fixes
Wi-Fi Fix for iOS 6
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4823738?tstart=240
How To: Workaround iPad Wi-Fi Issues
http://www.theipadfan.com/workaround-ipad-wifi-issues/
Another Fix For iOS 6 WiFi Problems
http://tabletcrunch.com/2012/10/27/fix-ios-6-wifi-problems-ssid/
Wifi Doesn't Connect After Waking From Sleep - Sometimes increasing screen brightness prevents the failure to reconnect after waking from sleep. According to Apple, “If brightness is at lowest level, increase it by moving the slider to the right and set auto brightness to off.”
Fix For iOS 6 WiFi Problems?
http://tabletcrunch.com/2012/09/27/fix-ios-6-wifi-problems/
Did iOS 6 Screw Your Wi-Fi? Here’s How to Fix It
http://gizmodo.com/5944761/does-ios-6-have-a-wi+fi-bug
How To Fix Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue After Upgrading To iOS 6
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/09/fix-wi-fi-connectivity-issue-after-upgrading- to-ios-6.html
iOS 6 iPad 3 wi-fi "connection fix" for netgear router
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsWS4ha-dn0
Apple's iOS 6 Wi-Fi problems
http://www.zdnet.com/apples-ios-6-wi-fi-problems-linger-on-7000004799/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How to Boost Your Wi-Fi Signal
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/a/How-To-Boost-Your-Wi-Fi-Signal.h tm
Troubleshooting a Weak Wi-Fi Signal
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/a/Troubleshooting-A-Weak-Wi-Fi-Sig nal.htm
How to Fix a Poor Wi-Fi Signal on Your iPad
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/a/How-To-Fix-A-Poor-Wi-Fi-Signal-O n-Your-iPad.htm
iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
WiFi Connecting/Troubleshooting http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/wifi/
How to Fix: My iPad Won't Connect to WiFi
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/How-To-Fix-My-Ipad-Wont-Connect -To-Wi-Fi.htm
iOS: Connecting to the Internet http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1695
iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
Connect iPad to Wi-Fi (with troubleshooting info)
http://thehowto.wikidot.com/wifi-connect-ipad
Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
How To Fix iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue http://tinyurl.com/7nvxbmz
Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
Wi-Fi or Bluetooth settings grayed out or dim
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1559
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
 Cheers, Tom

NO HELP WITH ROUTING ISSUES FROM VERIZON

Spend 2 hours with technical support to no avail. Have routing issues where I can’t get from my FIOS residential account to remote web site abroad. Trace route fails at so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]. FIOS technical support is incapable of doing any troubleshooting beyond basic customer premises equipment, refusing to escalate the case to network engineering team. I was basically told by FIOS tech support supervisor {edited for privacy} that this is not Verizon’s problem and no help will be provided. What is even more frustrating that Verizon agents are not capable of receiving emails from customers with details such as trace route.
Is there anyone at Verizon monitoring this and able to help? Just in case, ticket number that I have with Verizon is {edited for privacy}
Here is trace route details.
tracert 212.44.136.226
Tracing route to brserv.bridgetour.ru [212.44.136.226]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2    12 ms     9 ms     9 ms L100.BSTNMA-VFTTP-71.verizon-gni.net [98.118.28
1]
3    16 ms    19 ms    19 ms G0-6-4-1.BSTNMA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
75.132]
4    45 ms    15 ms     8 ms ae3-0.BOS-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.6
5    19 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.xe-3-2-0.IL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.81]
6    21 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.ge-1-2-0.IL1.NYC12.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.86]
7   107 ms   108 ms   107 ms so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]
8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.

BT help aren't always that helpful, but BT engineers claim that it is a BT sales issue and nothing to do with them seems a bit extreme.
Are you sure your daily speed is 8Mbits, not 8Mbytes? How are you measuring this? Is it the number coming from the BT speedtest?
If it really is 8Mb, then I think it's worth checking with the mods;  at: http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951 . But be aware they take 3 working days to reply: sometimes more if busy.

MI424WR Router - connection on and off - noticing freezing also

Hi,
Our internet connection (ethernet cabels and wi-fi) have been on and off since last year Fall. And as per instructed each time we called, we reboot router, pcs, etc, to resolve the connectivity issue each time it happened.
Now, it become more frequent again. And the last 3 times we've noticed when connection froze/dropped, the router lights were actually all solid green including the internet indicator light.
Can we be sure that the router is old and need to be replaced or there's other explaination?
thx
wilc

Bad routers do happen; and they can fail in some rather entertaining ways.
When I first got FiOS service some years ago, the first router Verizon gave me was bad. In my case, the symptom was that the connection would just totally drop off for 30-45 seconds every so often, then resume. When I'd call and complain, I was told I needed to call when experiencing the problem.
Ahem. Of course, if I started to contact Verizon when noticing the problem, the connection would have resumed well before I got through to a representative.
After some weeks of this, I insisted on a replacement router. I got one and the problem went away.
Call back, calmly explain the entirety of what you've been through, and insist on a replacement router.
In the worst case, the problem will persist and you will have ruled out the router as its source.

When I turn on my iPad and. Go onto the Internet the wireless router cuts off and the Internet stops working and doesn't respond

Hello,
When I turn on my iPad 2 and go onto the safari and go onto google the wireless router cuts off and turns the Internet off and the Internet doesn't respond and then after I have to turn the router off and turn it on and then it is back to normal it has happening when I recently updated the new iOS 6 on my iPad since then it was been doing this please can you help and help me sort the problem out
Thanks

Some things to try first:
1. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
2. Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
3. Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
4. Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
5. Renew IP Address: (especially if you are droping internet connection)
    •    Launch Settings app
    •    Tap on Wi-Fi
    •    Tap on the blue arrow of the Wi-Fi network that you connect to from the list
    •    In the window that opens, tap on the Renew Lease button
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
iOS 6 Wifi Problems/Fixes
Fix For iOS 6 WiFi Problems?
http://tabletcrunch.com/2012/09/27/fix-ios-6-wifi-problems/
Did iOS 6 Screw Your Wi-Fi? Here’s How to Fix It
http://gizmodo.com/5944761/does-ios-6-have-a-wi+fi-bug
How To Fix Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue After Upgrading To iOS 6
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/09/fix-wi-fi-connectivity-issue-after-upgrading- to-ios-6.html
iOS 6 iPad 3 wi-fi "connection fix" for netgear router
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsWS4ha-dn0
Apple's iOS 6 Wi-Fi problems
http://www.zdnet.com/apples-ios-6-wi-fi-problems-linger-on-7000004799/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How to Fix a Poor Wi-Fi Signal on Your iPad
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/a/How-To-Fix-A-Poor-Wi-Fi-Signal-O n-Your-iPad.htm
iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
WiFi Connecting/Troubleshooting http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/wifi/
How to Fix: My iPad Won't Connect to WiFi
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/How-To-Fix-My-Ipad-Wont-Connect -To-Wi-Fi.htm
iOS: Connecting to the Internet http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1695
iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
How To Fix iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue http://tinyurl.com/7nvxbmz
Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
 Cheers, Tom

Routing issue ASA5510 and CCME

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for