Rows remain locked after merging workspace

Hi there,
I wasn't able to manually refresh a workspace with changes merged into LIVE workspace by another child workspace. It seems the rows merged into LIVE remain locked by the merged child workspace.
The sample code below illustrates the problem:
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CreateWorkspace ('ws01', FALSE, 'WS not refreshed');
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.GotoWorkspace ('ws01');
SELECT DBMS_WM.GetWorkspace FROM DUAL;
-- insert a POLE element
DECLARE
     l_id          NUMBER;
BEGIN
     SELECT seq_entity.NEXTVAL INTO l_id FROM DUAL;
     INSERT INTO pole (id, num) VALUES (l_id, '&NUM');
     COMMIT;
END;
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.GotoWorkspace ('LIVE');
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CreateWorkspace ('ws02', TRUE, 'WS not refreshed');
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.GotoWorkspace ('ws02');
SELECT DBMS_WM.GetWorkspace FROM DUAL;
-- insert a POLE element
DECLARE
     l_id          NUMBER;
BEGIN
     SELECT seq_entity.NEXTVAL INTO l_id FROM DUAL;
     INSERT INTO pole (id, num) VALUES (l_id, '&NUM');
     COMMIT;
END;
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.GotoWorkspace ('LIVE');
-- merge workspace ws02
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.MergeWorkspace ('ws02');
-- refresh workspace ws01
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.RefreshWorkspace ('ws01');
The following error message is displayed:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20034: attempt to INSERT a [i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

Karina,
Until the 9iR2 (9.2.0.1) release of OWM, all continually-refreshed (CR) workspaces are, by default, locked in pessimistic mode. So, a workspace shared lock will be automatically taken on any rows modified by a CR workspace. In addition, when rows modified by a CR workspace are merged to its' parent workspace, we carry the locks forward. We need to do this to ensure that no other workspace can further refresh/modify this row thereby breaking the pessimistic mode of the CR workspace.
That is the reason you see the "row is locked" error. In other words, that is the current behaviour - it is not a bug.
Having said that, in our next release (9.2.0.2.0 Patch kit - available on OTN in the Software section of Workspace Manager as of Jan 30, 2003), we have removed this restriction. So, once you upgrade to this new kit, you should see this problem disappear.
Let us know if this works for you.
Thanks,
- Ramesh.

Similar Messages

  • Employee record remains locked after BAPI_EMPLOYEE_DEQUEUE

    I use WebServices gererated by the wizard in SE37 to change Employee Data.
    I call functions (through the webservice) in the following sequence:
    BAPI_EMPLOYEE_ENQUEUE
    BAPI_PERSDATA_CHANGE
    BAPI_EMPLOYEE_DEQUEUE
    The ENQUEUE and CHANGE operations work fine, but the record remains locked after that.
    (as seen by SM12), it adds one more entry, and the employee remains locked. So question now is - how to successfully Dequeue it now ?
    Here is a copy of entries as seen in SM12 after Enqueue, Change, and Dequeue:
    800 MZZZZZB 13:26:31 E PLOGI 80001CP00010358 0 1
    800 MZZZZZB 13:26:31 E PREL 80000001273############################## 1 1
    800 MZZZZZB 13:27:07 E BUT000 8000000002083 0 1
    Important: The entries disappear after a while, so there is a delay in DEQUEUE to take effect.
    Is there any configuration/customization to make DEQUEUE happen immediately?
    Thanks a lot...

    Solved.

  • Time Machine Lock in Preferences window doesn't remain locked after a system reboot

    I am not sure if this problem occurred in Lion or not, but in Mountain Lion, I'm noticing the lock in the lower left corner of the Time Machine preferences page doesn't remain locked after a reboot of the computer. Has anyone else noticed this issue? Is there a fix or is it a glitch that Apple will need to correct?

    From the menu bar, select  ▹ System Preferences ▹ Security & Privacy ▹ General ▹ Advanced... ▹ Require an administrator password to access locked preferences: On.

  • Notification remains locked after BDC of IW21...

    Hello, I have recorded two BDC sessions -- One for IW21 (Create Notification) and antoer for IW22 (Change Notification).  After I run the first BDC for IW21, I pass in the new notification number into second BDC to make changes to the newly created notification.
    When the second BDC is executed a message immediately displays stating that the notification is locked by user...and the BDC halts...
    I am executing the first BDC for IW21 with the following:
    CALL TRANSACTION 'IW21' USING bdcdata MODE 'E'.
    I'm wondering if it has to do with the mode I'm using ??
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated...
    Thank you,
    Kim.

    Hi Kim,
    See this thread (different subject but similar result and, hopefully, resolution) Mass PO release using BAPI_PO_RELEASE fails
    Regards,   Andy

  • Employee Record Remains Locked for a While After BAPI_EMPLOYEE_DEQUEUE

    Hi All,
    I'm exposing the following BAPI's:
    I'm calling the following  functions (through the webservice) in the following sequence:
    BAPI_EMPLOYEE_ENQUEUE
    BAPI_PERSDATA_CHANGE
    BAPI_EMPLOYEE_DEQUEUE
    The ENQUEUE and CHANGE operations work fine, m running the dequeue bapi but the record remains locked after that.
    (as seen by SM12), it adds one more entry, and the employee remains locked. So question now is u2013 how to successfully Dequeue it now ?
    Here is a copy of entries as seen in SM12 after Enqueue, Change, and Dequeue:
    800 MZZZZZB 13:Ǻ:31 E PLOGI 80001CP00010358 0 1
    800 MZZZZZB 13:26:31 E PREL 80000001273############################## 1 1
    800 MZZZZZB 13:27:07 E BUT000 8000000002083 0 1
    Important: The entries disappear after a while, so there is a delay in DEQUEUE to take effect.
    Is there any configuration/customization to make DEQUEUE happen immediately?

    Hi ,
    Try using commit work statement after deque FM., else use DEQUE_ALL FM.
    This may helps,
    thanks & regards,
    Kiran

  • Locked rows remained after Workspace has been deleted or closed

    Hi!
    I have big problem. I am unable to update rows in versioned table.
    I get message "Unable to Update row. ... Row is locked in workspace XXXX ", but there is no workspace XXXX. This workspace was deleted or merged....
    How can i get rows unlocked? executing function UnlockRows wasn't successful.
    Can i delete tablename_LOCK view?

    Thanks for your answer. I will try to do this.
    This is happening only in one table. I have more than 2000 locks but currently no workspace active. All workspaces are deleted or closed.
    Row Locks are from different workspaces.
    I will try to find out what cause this state.
    This database was upgraded from 9.2 to 10.2.

  • Oracle11gR2 Workspace Manager and table consistency after merge

    Hi folks,
         I'm working with Oracle Workspace Manager in order to get data inserted and validated into workpaces before they become available to the LIVE workspace.
         Doing some tests I found a problem about data consistency after I merge the data from a child workspace to the parent workspace.
         To be able to explain and reproduce the problem I create a simple test case:
    --Create table TB_LINK
    create table TB_LINK
      CD_LINK NUMBER not null,
      DS_LINK VARCHAR2(30)
    --Create primary key
    alter table TB_LINK add primary key (CD_LINK);
    --Create table TB_GUD
    create table TB_GUD
      CD_GUD  NUMBER not null,
      DS_GUD  VARCHAR2(30),
      CD_LINK NUMBER
    -- Create primary key
    alter table TB_GUD add primary key (CD_GUD);
    -- Create foreign key 
    alter table TB_GUD
      add constraint FK_TB_LINK foreign key (CD_LINK)
      references TB_LINK (CD_LINK);
    -- Create sequences
    create sequence SEQ_TB_GUD
    minvalue 1
    maxvalue 9999999999999999999999999999
    start with 1
    increment by 1
    nocache;
    create sequence SEQ_TB_LINK
    minvalue 1
    maxvalue 9999999999999999999999999999
    start with 1
    increment by 1
    nocache; 
    --Create Triggers
    create or replace trigger "INS_TB_GUD" before insert on TB_GUD for each row
    Begin
    select SEQ_TB_GUD.nextval into :new.CD_GUD from dual;
    end;
    create or replace trigger "INS_TB_LINK" before insert on TB_LINK for each row
    Begin
    select SEQ_TB_LINK.nextval into :new.CD_LINK from dual;
    end;
    --Enable version TB_LINK and TB_GUD
    EXECUTE DBMS_WM.EnableVersioning('TB_GUD','VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE',FALSE,FALSE,'UNLIMITED');
    EXECUTE DBMS_WM.EnableVersioning('TB_LINK','VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE',FALSE,FALSE,'UNLIMITED');
    --Create a workspace
    EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CreateWorkspace ('TEST_WKS');
    --Goto workspace TEST_WKS
    EXECUTE dbms_wm.gotoworkspace('TEST_WKS');
    --Insert data into TB_LINK and TB_GUD
    INSERT INTO TB_LINK(DS_LINK) VALUES ('DS1');
    INSERT INTO TB_LINK(DS_LINK) VALUES ('DS2');
    INSERT INTO TB_LINK(DS_LINK) VALUES ('DS3');
    INSERT INTO TB_LINK(DS_LINK) VALUES ('DS4');
    COMMIT;
    INSERT INTO TB_GUD(DS_GUD,CD_LINK) VALUES ('GUD1',1);
    INSERT INTO TB_GUD(DS_GUD,CD_LINK) VALUES ('GUD2',2);
    INSERT INTO TB_GUD(DS_GUD,CD_LINK) VALUES ('GUD3',3);
    INSERT INTO TB_GUD(DS_GUD,CD_LINK) VALUES ('GUD4',4);
    COMMIT;
    --Checking keys
    select * from tb_link;
       CD_LINK      DS_LINK
             1           DS1
             2           DS2
             3           DS3
             4           DS4
    select * from tb_gud;
       CD_GUD      DS_GUD     CD_LINK
             1           GUD1              1
             2           GUD2              2
             3           GUD3              3
             4           GUD4              4
    --Merge Workspace
    EXECUTE DBMS_WM.MergeWorkspace ('TEST_WKS');
    --Checking keys
    EXECUTE dbms_wm.gotoworkspace('LIVE');
    select * from tb_link;
       CD_LINK      DS_LINK
             5           DS4
             6           DS3
             7           DS1
             8           DS2
    We can see that the CD_LINK got new values after merge and that was not expected.
    select * from tb_gud;
       CD_GUD      DS_GUD                  CD_LINK
             6           GUD3                       3
             7           GUD1                       1
             8           GUD2                       2
             5           GUD4                       4
    We can see that the CD_GUD got new values after merge and that was not expected.
    Now, the values for the CD_LINK column does not have corresponding records at the TB_LINK table, as the foreign key does not exist anymore.
    Could you please help me understand what is going on?
    Thanks,
    Luis

    Hi Luis,
    The reason for the difference is that the trigger is being run during the MergeWorkspace operation.  The inserts into the child workspace(TEST_WKS) translates into an insert into the LIVE workspace during merge as the rows do not yet exist.  As a result, the trigger is fired and the sequence is evaluated.  Ideally, we should not allow the PK to be modified by a sequence in this case.
    You have 2 options:
    (1) Check for :new.CD_GUD being null prior to using the sequence.  Any dml coming from a merge/refresh operation will have a non-null value.
    (2) Turn off the trigger during dbms_wm procedures.  This can be done using dbms_wm.SetTriggerEvents.  I would assume you would only want this trigger being run for DML events.
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Ben

  • HT1414 After Voice over, opening code will not open ipad2 owing to not recognizing security code so remains locked have reset programmes but still does not work. How can I clear please my code was 2121 but will not open now?

    Hi, after turning on Voice over and then turning off the i pad 2,  I found that it would not turn on again as the locking code which always worked  till now,  2121 is not recognised. A voice can be heard when trying to enter the 4 letter code stating the letters
    I have tried to repair programme by resetting several times and also downloading i tune software as suggested by your advice centre but the i pad remains locked
    Please can you tell me how I can resolve this issue?
    Thanks  Derek Brown

    If it's slow on startup it would be extensions loading or LaunchDaemons starting up. 
    You should have a look in:
    /Library/LaunchDaemons
    /Library/Extensions
    You can count out anything in your home folder and it shouldn't put anything in /System as that's reserved for Apple. 

  • Pl sql row level locking with wait ?

    Hi,
    I am using oracle 10g.
    I am new to Oracle locks. I have two tables Table1(id_no, employee, salary) and Table2(id_no, employee, salary).
    I need to pull any requested row from Table1 into Table2 only once on demand. I have a procedure to pull data and there could be more than one requests try to call same procedure to pull a row from Table1 into Table2 at any given time.
    I coded below to achieve row level lock. if one transaction gets row level lock on Table1 at 2, so other Transactions should wait till the lock is released at line 2 or 5 to avoid duplicates.
    But below code is not working, I am getting duplicates when I call this using two concurrent java threads.
    How do I control this concurrency issue so that I can avoid duplicate entries in Table2. Could any one please help?
    1.begin
    2.select 0 into emp_cnt
    3.from Table1 where id=id_no
    4.for update;
    5.update Table1 set employee='xyz'
    6.where id=id_no;
    7.select count(*) into table2_cnt from Table2 where id=id_no;
    8.if(table2_cnt =0) then
    9.code to insert above row from Table1 to Table2;
    10.end if;
    11.commit;
    12.End;
    Edited by: 980916 on Jan 9, 2013 5:48 PM

    Welcome to the forums and welcome to Oracle.
    Lets establish one thing right from the beginning ... the Oracle Database is not a Microsoft product.
    There is no general reason to use row level locks, you should not want to use row level locks, you don't need row level locks, and you will almost never have any valid reason to consider row level locks.
    That said there are two situations were it may be necessary to lock a row prior to an update or delete (possibly in a merge) and in those cases you want to use the built-in SELECT FOR UPDATE syntax. (Demo here: http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/deadlocks.html#dlfu). But we should be clear here ... one rarely needs to use this locking mechanism as the chances of a collision in a well designed application are essentially zero.
    Also as you are new to Oracle please explore the dynamic performance view V$RESERVED_WORDS and do not name objects, columns, etc. with reserved word names not that there is an excuse in any product to name a column "ID." Something Joe Celko has railed about for decades and a tradition I think we should all follow.
    In the case of your posted code example (btw please read the FAQ and learn how to use tags) the solution is SELECT FOR UPDATE if locking can be justified which is unlikely.
    Edited by: damorgan on Jan 9, 2013 6:11 PM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Rolling back lock after RowInconsistentException (in ADF 11g)

    The JDeveloper 11g documentation explains under "Advanced Entity Object Techniques" how to override the select and lock functions so that you can do the locking with a stored procedure. I think I've done this as documented, but when I detect that another user has changed the row and raise the RowInconsistentException, this leaves the row locked (because the stored procedure did a "select for update"). So the user correctly gets told that someone else has changed the row, but the row stays locked until he does something else. I want to treat the RowInconsistentException as a failure and leave the row unlocked as it was before.
    I suppose I could invoke "getDBtransaction.rollback()" from my EntityImpl.java's doSelect() before throwing the RowInconsistentException, or perhaps from lock() after detecting it, but the example in the documentation doesn't do this so I'm worried that it might confuse ADF. So is there something else that I should be calling instead, in order to do the rollback?
    I'm sorry if I've missed the answer somewhere in the documentation, but I can't find it, so I'd very much appreciate it if someone can tell me how it's supposed to work.
    Thanks
         Phil
    Minor update: I've now tried using rollback(), but that does indeed seem to mess something up, because the user then doesn't get given an error message. He gets to see the current state of the database, because I use refresh(REFRESH_WITHDB_FORGET_CHANGES), but doesn't get an error message even though I'm still throwing RowInconsistentException - somehow the rollback seems to be causing this exception to get ignored! I need to tell the user that his change is not being implemented because someone else had already changed the row, while leaving the row unlocked. Help!
    Edited by: user451308 on May 15, 2009 11:56 AM

    Hi,
    exception handling should work the same. Can you give this a try in a test case you set up for using Facelets only? Note that JSF 2.0 has a changed exception handling which however should not lead to exceptions not getting throws at all. However, please verify on a clean Facelets project.
    Frank

  • GTT table getting Row Exclusive lock

    I have a procedure which loads a table which is used for reporting.
    Currently it is a single process which picks up most of the data after joining 2-3 big tables(around 70-80GB) and then loading the main table.
    The joins are on PI and also partitions are also being used. Then a lot of updates are done on the main table to update other columns which are being picked from different tables.
    As the processing is happening on huge amount of data(around 1M), so processing is taking a lot of time.
    This process is taking around 40-45 minutes.
    I am planning to use parallelism to run it in 75 sessions. So the initial big insert will be faster and later on all the updates will be done on smaller chunks which will benefit the performance.
    I planned to use GTT table so that i dont have to create 75 temp tables for each sessions.
    But while using GTT table(ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS) in parallel sessions, i am seeing that the GTT table is getting Row Exclusive lock and the time taken by overall process is increasing by lot.
    So i tested by using 75 temp tables. There i saw that the performance has increased by lots as assumed initially.
    Please let me know if there is any other way or how to remove the locks on GTT table.

    First you should question why you think you need 75 GTT.
    Also your question contains no useful information
    (no four digit version of Oracle, no OS, no number of processors) , this paragrah
    Currently it is a single process which picks up most of the data after joining 2-3 big tables(around 70-80GB) and then loading the main table.
    The joins are on PI and also partitions are also being used. Then a lot of updates are done on the main table to update other columns which are being picked from different tables.
    As the processing is happening on huge amount of data(around 1M), so processing is taking a lot of time.
    This process is taking around 40-45 minutes.tells nothing,
    so basically your questions boils down to
    - Hey I come from a sqlserver background (this is just an educated guess), how can I find a workaround to wreck Oracle to make it work like sqlserver.
    75 parallel sessions on say 4 to 8 processors is a very bad idea, as these sessions will be simple competing for resources.
    Also a row exclusive lock is just that: a row level lock. This isn't a problem, usually.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • ORA-20001: The current row is locked

    Hi Team
    I find below mentioned error message in my log table .Please can you suggest why we are getting this error .
    Some time back we had our OS migration from one server to another ,can it be related to that as we have noticed this error message after such migration.
    Please suggest what can be done in order to avoid such error.
    ERROR IN hr_person_api.update_person api failed -step4 -ORA-20001: The current row is locked
    Cause:        You are trying to lock a row in the per_people_f table which is currently being locked by another user. 
    Action:        Re-query and attempt to lock the row again
    ERROR IN hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg API - STEP8.2 - ORA-20001: The current row is locked
    Cause:        You are trying to lock a row in the per_all_assignments_f table which is currently being locked by another user. 
    Action:        Re-query and attempt to lock the row again.
    Regards
    Anima

    Hi Everyone
    Can anyone help me with this .Why we are getting this error and how can it be handled.
    Please suggest what can be done in order to avoid such error.
    ERROR IN hr_person_api.update_person api failed -step4 -ORA-20001: The current row is locked
    Cause:        You are trying to lock a row in the per_people_f table which is currently being locked by another user. 
    Action:        Re-query and attempt to lock the row again
    ERROR IN hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg API - STEP8.2 - ORA-20001: The current row is locked
    Cause:        You are trying to lock a row in the per_all_assignments_f table which is currently being locked by another user. 
    Action:        Re-query and attempt to lock the row again.

  • Hi All, Need help my iphone 4 lock after upgrape ios7.1 (no service). i buy a secondhand phone not know first apple id. please advise how to normalize

    Hi All, Need help my iphone 4 lock after upgrape ios7.1 (no service). i buy a secondhand phone not know first apple id. please advise how to normalize

    You will need the original owner of the iPhone to unlock it for you, or the iPhone will remain useless.  It has been Activation Locked, which is described here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5818

  • Screen remains on after bringing it to my ear during a call (After ios 7 update)

    Screen remains on after bringing it to my ear during a call (After ios 7 update)

    Try these steps:
    Screen will not lock or go black when answering calls
    Verify mute or speaker have not been activated, just prior to placing your ear over the receiver.
    While on a call hold your hand over the top third of the display, and verify that the screen is locked or goes to sleep.
    Try turning iPhone off and then on again.
    (from http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2802)
    You might also want to try a reset:
    Reset: Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button together for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.

  • Row level locks

    Hi All,
    Version - Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    I have a card's data in a table. Whenver a two different sessions/threads selects the data sometimes they get the same card.
    Now I need to lock the record. If Thred-1 selects then it will lock the first records and thread-2 must select the second record as the first record is locked by thread-1.
    I have written a piece of code , at first session it locks one record and when second session select it selects no records.
    I have takem MIN group function because I want the cards to be selected in order.
    Can you please tell where is my code went wrong or need some changes. Data and code is given below.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz ORDER BY 1;
    CARD_NO          PIN  SERIAL_NUMBER DATE_CREATED DATE_MERGED DATE_ALLOCATED DATE_REGISTERED
    6338079966430591 9985 9950013661    12/06/2011                             
    6338079973369543 6858 9950013660    12/06/2011                             
    6338079978994154 7144 9950013655    12/06/2011                             
    6338079981471778 7631 9950013654    12/06/2011                             
    6338079986365041 7849 9950013657    12/06/2011                             
    SQL>
    Thread - 1
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated 6338079966430591
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL>
    Thread - 2
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL> My concern is that it must allocate in the order
    6338079966430591
    6338079973369543
    ....

    It is because MIN(ard_no) is able to find value from table which is locked by you thread 1 and thread 1 mentioned NOWAIT thus it thread 2 went out without getting anything.
    Please check my reply to your duplicate thread "row level locking" .

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problems with hp laserjet 4ml on solaris 7

    Hi out there, I`ve got a problem with a hp laserjet 4 ml on "solaris 7" (AXUS ultrasparc WSU1D/200): After I had installed the driver with the hp jetadmin-tool, it`s only possible to print as a root-user, as a normal user nothing happened, the printj

  • How to send a video from a n8 by mms

    nokia

  • X2-01 community problem

    When i want to log in to nokia community it load show my facebook just before it finaly open, it will be telling me error sported, it cannot load again, up till now i cant acess my facebook tro community. What is d error wit it?

  • Price determination as per delivery date

    Hi All, I have created a PO in which the PO is picking up the dalivery date as the current date. when i change the delivery date as some other date there is a message saying Delivery date changed (new price determination process may be necessary).. I

  • Audition CS5.5 Open '*.PCM' As: dialog forgets settings

    After using Audition 1.0 for several years, my work finally sprung for an upgrade to CS5.5! (They needed more Audition licences and had trouble finding version 1.0) My typical usage is analysing underwater recordings which are 96kHz 16-bit PCMs. In b