RV016 Gateway to Gateway VPN Internet Traffic

I have a RV016 router in place that has numerous Gateway to Gateway VPNs connected to various sites over Comcast Cable. I would like to funnel all traffic through the RV016, but I am only seeing the tunnel traffic going between each.
I think I saw some posts eluding to the fact that since the RV016 only deals with layer 3 that this is impossible. What if I added a route to each of my workstations that router all 0.0.0.0 traffic through the RV016 router. Would this work even if it's really ugly?
What I am trying to avoid is having an open Internet connection at all of my sites. I would rather be able to control it here at the main office's RV016.
Thanks in advance!

tekliu,
I actually found and tried this solution last night, but below is how my routing table looks on my RV042. When I do a tracert to www.google.com or whatever I can see that the traffic basically hits my router then out through the Comcast modem. If I do anything on the main office subnet 172.16.1.0 then I can see it hit both routers.
Should I maybe reset the router to default and do this from the start? As you can see below all 0.0.0.0 traffic is set to go out through the Comcast gateway 74.94.253.10.
Routing Table Entry List
Destination IP Address
Subnet Mask
Default Gateway
Hop Count
Interface
74.94.253.8
255.255.255.252
40
ixp1
74.94.253.8
255.255.255.252
45
ipsec0
192.168.3.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
192.168.2.0
255.255.255.0
74.94.253.10
10
ipsec0
192.168.2.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
172.16.1.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
default
0.0.0.0
74.94.253.10
40
ixp1
I can send you all of my config data when if you need it.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Windows VPN internet traffic handling

So at work, I installed Windows 2012 R2's built-in VPN server. I can connect to it from home (using Windows 8.1), but I noticed that when the VPN connection is enabled, all internet traffic that would normally go to my local gateway is now going into the VPN line to my office's gateway and thereby going through my office's firewall. So my home browsing activity is being transacted as if i'm in the office.
I'm about to roll-out the VPN to the rest of the office but want to see if there's anything I can do to change this behavior. The SonicWall NetExtender VPN doesn't do this.
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi Ross,
You can do this in several ways:
1. If your proxy is to be configured on the computer browsers (like ISA proxy), then simply add the traffic from the PCs to the IPs of the proxy to the VPN ACL and to the nonat (with deny).
2. Add all traffic over VPN from the user subnet. At this time you can remove the NAT commands all together since no NAT is required anymore. You can use this even if the proxy is something like Websense that works by sniffing the traffic.
Please rate if this helped.
Regards,
Daniel

IPSEC Cisco VPN connection. Modifying default VPN gateway allows internet traffic but loses access to VPN

Hello!!
I'm using the IPSEC Cisco VPN Network property to connect to my company.
Once I get connected, I lose internet access, because all the traffic is redirected through the tunnel and I want both, of course.
If I modify the default getaway in the routing table, with this command
route change default x.x.x.x, where this is the getaway IP when not connected to the VPN,
I gain access to internet, but I lose access through the VPN tunnel.
I was reading about it in google, and what I have to do is to add a static route to the VPN again, but I don't know how.
Could you please help me?
thanks in advance!!

Hi Norbert,
I am sorry to say that configuring routes in Azure Virtual network is not supported. I recommend you to submit your reuqirement on Azure Feedback and hope it would be released soon:
http://feedback.azure.com/forums/217313-networking-dns-traffic-manager-vpn-vnet
Best regards,
Susie
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Urgent help needed-----Internet Gateway & VPN Gateway---???---

Hi All,
First of all apologies as I am new to Cisco.
I have 2 sites Main site routers 1 is configured for internet having IP address 10.10.10.48. 2nd router is configured for VPN on separate data link configured with bgp protocol having ip address 10.10.10.51. My LAN computers are configured with 10.10.10.48 gateway for internet access.
DR-Site have 1 router configured for internet having IP 192.168.1.48. 2nd router is configured for VPN on separate data link configured with bgp protocol having ip address 192.168.1.52. My LAN computers are configured with 192.168.1.48 gateway for internet access.
Problem:-
if I need to connect with VPN I need to change default gateway from both ends otherwise VPN can not access network's from both ends in this case I loose internet because gateway is not there to service internet.
How to overcome this problem.
Thanks

Have you thought about implementing Policy Based routing to send all Internet traffic to the Internet router, and all other traffic to your VPN router? You will then have to move your client's default gateway to the 3560 by creating a SVI. Then add the routing policy to the SVI. And you would do the same at the DR.

RV016 / Windos Server 2012 - Gateway to Gateway Vpn.

We have two sites and have on one site (main one) windows 2012 server as the DC on the network and it is also a gateway through which employees connect to the company network. On our other site we do not have servers set up and e had purchased RV016 hoping we could set up a continious gateway to gateway vpn connection. We had so far no luck on getting it to work, which begs the question - is it possible? Thank you.

tekliu,
I actually found and tried this solution last night, but below is how my routing table looks on my RV042. When I do a tracert to www.google.com or whatever I can see that the traffic basically hits my router then out through the Comcast modem. If I do anything on the main office subnet 172.16.1.0 then I can see it hit both routers.
Should I maybe reset the router to default and do this from the start? As you can see below all 0.0.0.0 traffic is set to go out through the Comcast gateway 74.94.253.10.
Routing Table Entry List
Destination IP Address
Subnet Mask
Default Gateway
Hop Count
Interface
74.94.253.8
255.255.255.252
40
ixp1
74.94.253.8
255.255.255.252
45
ipsec0
192.168.3.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
192.168.2.0
255.255.255.0
74.94.253.10
10
ipsec0
192.168.2.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
172.16.1.0
255.255.255.0
50
ixp0
default
0.0.0.0
74.94.253.10
40
ixp1
I can send you all of my config data when if you need it.
Thanks!

How to redirect Internet traffic from RV082 to RV042 through a VPN Tunnel??

Fellows,
We have offices in USA and Venezuela.
In our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router.
We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
The point is:
How   could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office   (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
The   reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which   are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the   Venezuelan IP's.
We can not use the PPTP option since the equipment which will use the streaming services (like hulu, crackle, etc.) in Venezuela is a Google TV device which doesn't allow the configuration of proxy navegation or PPTP VPN connections itself. That's the reason why we need to do that through the routers.
We will really appreciate your support on this matter.
Daniel

Hi Daniel, this is called ESP wildcard forwarding which the router does support.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12534   <- This is older but applicable
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3766661
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts

Multiple gateways for different Traffic on ASA 5510 firewall

Hello,
My network atthe moment is set up as:
WAN, with three sites
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1 is behind a non-Cisco firewall, which is connected to the internet via a Frame Relay link (using a Cisco 1721 router). We host a number of servers on the Internal network and DMZ's.
All sites connect to the WAN using Cisco routers or switches.
All internet traffic (IN and OUT) for all sites goes via the non-Cisco firewall.
I am interested in the ASA 5510 with six interfaces.
Using the ASA 5510 is it possible to set up two (2) internet connections, one via the Frame Relay and a second internet connection via an ADSL connection?
Then, is it possible to direct the outward-bound traffic via specific gateways based upon either:
(a) the type of traffic, say HTTP from users behind the firewall; or
(b) the IP addresses of the host (i.e. users' PC versus the servers)
Any assistance is welcome.
Kind regards,
IT@C

yes you can do this with policy routing on the internet router in front of the firewall assuming that you are connecting both ISPs to that router. Also, remember that you can do vlans on the ASA. This may cut down on the # of interfaces that you use in your config.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080636f89.html
HTH, pls rate!

Quickvpn / client to gateway vpn rv042 can only ping router

I am setting up remote access using an RV042 router. Using quickvpn or a client-to gateway vpn and shrewsoft client, I can only access/ping the LAN side of the remote router and one machine on the remote network. The PPTP server and native Windows 7 connection provide access to all machines on the remote network.
I have 2 possible reasons for this and would like to find the real reason:
1) The remote RV042 is behind another router, and that router restricts access other than the PPTP traffic.
2) The VPN tunnels other than PPTP only allow access to the remote LAN side of the router and remote machines that have the remote router defined as their gateway in the IP configuration.
Any ideas?

I've narrowed the problem down to option 2 above. If I change the gateway of a LAN resource to point to the LAN side of the router, it can be accessed through the VPN tunnel.
I haven't had time to see if adding routing entries can fix this problem. Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Also, I would appreciate an explanation of why the PPTP connection works. I will research this myself (eventually) but am already backed up with other projects..

Citrix Access Gateway VPN

I have a WRT300N. I am able to use the cisco VPN with no issues. I recently started a new job where we use the Citrix Access Gateway VPN. I am able to connect to the gateway with no problem but I can't get Outlook and IE 7 working consistently. Occasionally I can connect with Outlook but the majority of the time it fails. It does not matter if I use wireless or a wired connection. I am able to connect with no problem from other sites (i.e. hotel).

Open an Internet Explorer browser page on your wired computer(desktop).In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press Enter...Leave username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
On the set-up tab change the MTU Size to 1350 and click Save Settings...
Once you return to the set up page click on the Security tab and uncheck Block Anonymous Internet Requests and click on Save Settings...
Click on "Applications and Gaming" tab and then click on "Port Range Triggering" subtab...
1) On the first line in Application box type in ABC, in the Triggered Range type in 25 in both the boxes and Forwarded Range type in 447 in both the boxes , check the enable box... and click on Save Settings...

RV016 gateway to gateway rv082 won't connect

Dear Gurus
New hardware here, requesting a bit of your knowledge
We are tryingin to setup a simple gateway to gateway VPN
HomeA Has an RV016 with a public static IP
Local Group Security Gateway type is IP Only with the IP
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.0.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: Dynamic + Email
Email address [email protected]
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.1.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
HomeB has an RV082 with a dynamic ADSL link
Local Group Security Gateway type is DynamicIP +Email
Email address [email protected]
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.1.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: IP Only
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.0.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
The idea is for HomeB which has a dynamic IP, to reach HomeA, which has a static IP and connect.
But they just wont. I have not clue what's wrong, I followed the instructions, maybe i miss interpreted something.
I could share the VPN logs for both., Im getting a lot of errors there.
All pointers or suggestions are appreciated.
Im pasting here a snap of the receiving end HomeA, when i press connect on HomeB
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: responding to Quick Mode
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3b08f98f
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 3b08f98f
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = fdb78f39
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = fdb78f39
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Responder send Quick Mode 2nd packet
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Responder send Quick Mode 2nd packet
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:51:41 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:51:51 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:51:51 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:51:51 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:51:51 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2562: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2562: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Responder Received Quick Mode 1st packet
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Responder Received Quick Mode 1st packet
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: esp_ealg_id=2-2,esp_ealg_keylen=0, key_len=64,esp_aalg_id=1-1.
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: You should NOT use insecure ESP algorithms [ESP_DES (64)]!
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: responding to Quick Mode
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 88cbdfad
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound SPI value = 88cbdfad
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = bdcdfc69
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound SPI value = bdcdfc69
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Responder send Quick Mode 2nd packet
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Responder send Quick Mode 2nd packet
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:51:56 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:52:06 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:52:06 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2564: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:52:06 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:52:06 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
Mar 10 11:52:11 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:52:11 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2563: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_R1
Mar 10 11:52:11 2012
VPN Log
(g2gips0)[1] 187.179.136.229 #2558: ignoring informational payload, type PAYLOAD_MALFORMED
thanks

Alejandro,
Any chance you could share your solution? I am having the exact same problem on a tunnel between two RV082s.

Mountain Lion Server VPN unable to route internet traffic

Hi! I have set up a VPN server on my home network specifically so that I could connect via a VPN client remotely and tunnel all internet traffic through my home network (It is a long story but I need to be able to access services that are specific to my home IP . . . ) I have been tearing my hair out trying to get it work but can not. The VPN connection happens OK and I can set up the remote client to send all traffic via VPN but any internet traffic just times out . . . In other words I can not get the server to share my home network via the VPN connection.

Hi and thanks for taking the time to answer.
As I am sure you have guessed I don't have much experience or knowledge with this. So I will try to clarify what I am trying to do.
I do not need a VPN server for the conventional reasons of being able to access a private network (i.e my home network) remotely, although this is a nice additional benefit. I need the VPN server so that I can log in remotely (when I am using my mobile broadband or when I am overseas for example) and make it look like the machine I am using is on my home network.
The reason for this is that I have access to web services that are IP specific. That is I can ONLY log in if I am logging in from my registered home IP (which is static for this exact reason).
I have been told on similar support sites that if I route ALL traffic through the VPN, then when I use my browser on the remote machine all web traffic will go through the VPN as well and it will look like the traffic is coming from the subnet of my home IP.
I guess in other words I am trying to use my VPN as an "anonymous" proxy (anonymous in the sense that although the traffic is coming form somewhere else, it still looks like it is coming from my home IP).
I know this will cripple the speed due to the narrow upstream bandwidth but I am willing to pay this price.
Now as for your questions:
I have the server set up on a machine on my home subnet and I have enabled VPN port forwarding on the ADSL router.
I know the connection happens as when I connect the VPN either from my iPhone using 4G or my laptop using my mobile broadband I get the "connecting . . . authenticating . . . connected" messages and when I check in properties it shows it to be connected to my home IP as VPN server and has an IP address that looks like it is on my home subnet.
By internet traffic timing out I meant web traffic.
As I mentioned above, I need all web traffic to go through the VPN. So indeed not ALL traffic but definitely ALL web traffic. The only way I could find to do this is to enable the "Send all traffic" option.
Now I guess the obvious question is why am I not using a proxy. I have tried (and spent ages setting up Squid) but could never get it to "hide" the true origin of the traffic completely.
Now having written all this, I reinstalled mountain lion and server yesterday (out of sheer frustration rather than anything else) and it seems to work this morning. So if I log in via VPN on my mobile or laptop and use an IP checker on the web it comes up with my home IP : ))
The only thing I have now noticed is that if the VPN server stops working (which seems to be as soon as the computer I run it on goes to sleep) web traffic reverts to using the normal channels which is potentially problematic for me.
So my questions now are -
Any ideas what I was doing wrong in the first place?
Any suggestions on how I could set this up better?
Any way to set up the remote device so that it only allows web traffic via VPN (so that if the VPN connection drops, it is unable to use it's own internet connection for continuing web traffic)?
Thanks for any suggestions : )
Cheers

How to manage port 80 hosts via gateway - gateway vpn (rv220w)

I replace our aging rv082 routers with wireless rv220w routers. The gateway to gateway vpn works great, however I am no longer able to manage our print servers port 80 management page. I can ping any host with success, and I can manage hosts that have a port 10000 or 8000 web interface - but no port 80 ones... I had no issues when using the old rv082 routers...

I replace our aging rv082 routers with wireless rv220w routers. The gateway to gateway vpn works great, however I am no longer able to manage our print servers port 80 management page. I can ping any host with success, and I can manage hosts that have a port 10000 or 8000 web interface - but no port 80 ones... I had no issues when using the old rv082 routers...

ASA5510 w/ (2) Internet Connections: Dedicated VPN traffic, Dedicated Internet traffic?

We have an ASA5510 and we're currently using 1 internet connection to handle our site-to-site VPN connection and our internet traffic. We have a second internet connection on hand. What we would like to do it use BOTH internet connections: (1) will be dedicated to our VPN connection, (1) will be handling all our internet traffic. How can we get this setup? We're running Software Version 8.4(1)

See below, this discussion will provider guidance as to how to setup your topology.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3359963#3359963
Don't forget to rate all posts that are helpful.

VPN 3005 - Reroute Internet traffic out local connection

We have a VPN 3005 concentrator that connects to our backbone switch. We have about 6 sites who have the following subnet:
site A: 172.16.x.x
site B: 172.17.x.x (etc)
When a user is at home, hotel, or directly connected to the Internet and they connect with the VPN client to our network we want all Internet traffic (cnn, google, etc) to route through their local connection and not through our network through our internal Internet connection. How can I setup the VPN Concentrator to allow all internal traffic and reroute all other traffic out their local Internet connection?

split tunneling needs to be configured on the concentrator.
firstly, create a network list.
go configuration>policy management>traffic management>network lists. then put the private lan ip behind concentrator on to the list.
go configuration>user management>groups>client config
you will see "split tunneling policy" and "split tunneling network list"
with option "split tunneling policy", choose "only tunnel networks on the list". with option "split tunneling network list", choose the network list you just created.

How can I route internet traffic over IPSec point to point?

I have a remote site that connects by IPSEC with the end points on a router and ASA. The connection is working fine and the remote site can access my other networks at the main headquarters. The problem is, currently this remote site is accessing the internet via the same link that is supposed to VPN everything back to headquarters. I need to figure out how to VPN their internet traffic to my main headquarters. There's an IPrism behind the firewall to filter web access so it seems like I need to point the remote sites default gateway to my routing device that's behind my Iprism?
Also, currently the outside interface on the remote site's router does not have an ACL applied, can someone suggest what that ACl should look like? Thank you for your help! Here is a sample configuration of the remote site's router:
crypto isakmp policy 20
(encryption parameters here)
crypto isakmp key password address x.x.x.x (Public ASA IP) no-xauth
crypto ipsec transform-set remotesite (encryption parameters here)
crypto ipsec df-bit clear
crypto map Mainsite 1 ipsec-isakmp
set peer x.x.x.x (Public ASA IP)
set transform-set remotesite
match address 100
interface FastEthernet0/0
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0
ip nbar protocol-discovery
interface FastEthernet0/1
description ISP Interface
ip address x.x.x.x (public IP) 255.255.255.0
crypto map Mainsite
crypto ipsec df-bit clear
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x (ISP's default gateway)
access-list 100 remark Access list Mainsite Access
access-list 100 permit ip 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.3.0.0 0.0.255.255
and other various headquarter networks...

Hi Mark, you can modify your crypto acl to permit any any on your remote site which will make all traffic goes through the tunnel. Then on ASA you need to do hairpinning on the outside interface. This will make users on remote site to access internet via HQ. But if you do it this way the internet traffic goes straight to internet without having them filtered by your iPrism.
What I am not sure about is if there is a way to do it if you want those traffics to be filtered by the iPrism before going out to internet.
HTH

RV016 Gateway to Gateway VPN Internet Traffic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for