Rv042 dual-wan threshold based load balance?
I have an RV042 (it's old, silver/dark grey plastic front one) w/ firmware 1.3.13.02-tm.
The reason we bought this (long ago) was to balance two WAN connections, one with unlimited data and one capped monthly. It did that once, but for a couple years both connections have been unmetered so it's just been balancing them 50/50. As of today one WAN connection (the new much faster one) is back to being metered but I can't figure out how to configure the RV042 as it once was to prefer sending traffic over the slow, unmetered connection first, and only use the faster metered connection when necessary.
It's been a long time and honestly I only vaguely remember the ability to prioritize a connection based on % of bandwidth used so that all traffic would go over the unlimited connection 1st until it was flooded, and only then fall over to the metered connection. This is totally different than the weighted round robin, or smart link backup.
I found this 3rdparty pforum post that supports that vauge memory and suggests this was eliminated netweem firmware 1.23 and 1.3:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/rv042-load-balancing-options-from-the-manual-where-to-find.15512/#post-69948
So I humlbly ask... Is it possible to replicate this functionality with the current firmware? if so how? If not, how to do roll back to firmware 1.23?
It sounded like perhaps I could assigned WAN1 a bandwidth of 100000 (even though it's really 1500) and then assign WAN2 a bandwidth of 1 (even though it's really 20000) and the result might be the prioritization I'm looking to achieve... but I feel like I'm stumbling in the dark at the point.
Just FYI, I'm not at all opposed to buying new hardware to acheive this if it's not terribly expensive (ie. <$200). I'd rather not, but I've got to solve this quick.
Hi Jon,
I Also have one of these routers.
On the bottom mine says (v02) which means its hardware version is 2.
I just got this one brand new for home as I have been using them for a very long time now. However I have been using them for VPN and now I am needing the same functionality as you.
I am currently running Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19-tm
If you login to the web management (eg 192.168.1.1) and go to System Management > Dual-WAN
Down the bottom you will see "Protocol Binding".
This is all I know of to send specific ports or applications via a specific WAN.
I'll give you an example of how I am using it currently.. (BTW it seems to be working OK, But you are on a higher firmware)
eg: WAN1 is more reliable than WAN2 which is a cheap unlimited service.
So I bind port 5060 (sip), port 80 (http) and port 443 (https) to WAN1 so that my VOIP phone is on the good service and so is all web traffic.
so all the other stuff can use the unlimited connection.
Also, My current bandwidth settings are
WAN UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
1 384 8000
2 384 10000
And Under: System Management > Bandwidth Management you can also prioritize those ports.
This may help you in some way, So maybe you can help me..
Your post has made me not want to upgrade the firmware.. Can you please confirm that this functionality exists still?
Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Session based load balance + Prepared statements
Experts,
From the docs I understand that there are 3 load balancing techniques. One is client side and two are server side. Of the two, one is session count based load balancing, and as per docs, it is recommended for connection pool setting.
My question is if I have prepared statements originally created using connection to node1, and say if listener re-directs the conneciton to another node node2, will the prepared statement work on node2 ?.
Thanks
VissuJust to clarify, the question is:
Are the prepared statements usable when we use session count based load balancing. -
Health based load balancing.
I know that RM can provide health based load balancing e.g. RM will stop giving the load if WEF server is not healthy. We have a F5 load balancer, Can't we get the health based load balancing using F5?
Regards Restless Spiriti think you can do. You can specify the number of monitors that must report a pool member as being available before that member is defined as being in an up state.
check this support article will give you different method of loadbalacing
Load Balancing pool
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog -
Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble
PID VID :
RV042 V03
Firmware Version :
v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
"http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
System Management
> Dual Wan
In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
ThanksAny ideas or advice from anyone?
-
Running a RV042 in Smart Link with NSD Mode
WAN1: Cable Internet to ISP
WAN2: DSL Internet to backup ISP
WAN1 is set as the primary WAN.
With both links up, when I pull the plug on WAN1, it failsover to WAN2 in the expected amount of time and resumes internet traffic.
When I plug WAN1 back in though, the service doesn't automatically fail back to the Preferred WAN1 Connection, no matter how long I wait.
Advice?
Thanks!I've used it for two different ASNs all the time. Yes, you will have problems with SSL logins or any logins that check the source IP, but that can be easily fixed with some entries under the protocol binding.
There's no real protocol being used for the load balance. Just a weighted round-robin based on the bandwidth information you enter for each of the WANs.
Huntsville's Premiere Car and Bike e-magazine: www.huntsvillecarscene.com -
If 3 Real servers in a non-load balancing environmet are setting session cookies with diffrenet cookie names e.g.
server1 response
set-Cookie: SESSIDSAAAAAA=DMNNNELCECNCKDIIDCPOIMGG
Server2 response
set-Cookie: SESSIDSBBBBBB=DAAMMNELCECNCKPYTWPOIPOP
Server3 response
set-Cookie: SESSIDSCCCCCC=POHYTUOIPOPPLKJHTERIQOKJ
then how can CSM be configured with cookie based stickiness.
I tried cookie insert on CSM with NULL value Assigned to "COOKIE_INSERT_EXPIRATION_DATE".
It resulted in two set cookie responses (one from server and one from CSM).
I am wondering how csm will react ( cookie insert is used) if client request carries two cookie name-value pairs.
clients are behind megaproxy so cookie based stickiness is needed.
Thanksif you look into a http client request you will see that many times there are more than 1 cookies.
The most important is to make sure the CSM insert a cookie with a different name.
Create your own name.
The client will receive both the csm cookie and the server cookie and will send both when opening a new connection.
The CSM is able to locate its own cookie in the list and do the stickyness.
Gilles. -
Dual ISP connection unequal load balancing
Hi All,
I an issue regarding load balancing between to ISP. I have done policy based routing as stated in other cisco discussions .
I have 2 /30 as my test ISP and isp ip configured on other switch while i have my customer configs on my end. I can ping the two test ISP from my router but not with PC's in the lan until i remove "ip nat inside source route-map 20 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20 overload" from the routers config.
.. Please help
Load-Balancing-Router#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2716 bytes
! Last configuration change at 04:09:37 UTC Tue Apr 21 2015 by anprasad
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Load-Balancing-Router
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.100
ip dhcp pool LAN
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
ip domain name fnu.ac.fj
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FGL150925YE
username anprasad privilege 15 secret 5 $1$Oy40$h13lWAN4upzI19L6/MXjf/
username aaa privilege 15 secret 5 $1$W3JH$LMd0LUtdxJlXXJkB.NxjB0
ip ssh version 1
class-map match-all 512K-Outbound
match access-group name DR-512K-OutBound
class-map match-all 10240K-Outbound
match access-group name DR-1024K-OutBound
policy-map DR-Outbound
class 10240K-Outbound
police rate 10240000 bps burst 1920000 bytes
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
class 512K-Outbound
police rate 512000 bps burst 96000 bytes
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
description Student-Internet
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 202.0.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20
description Staff-Internet
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 202.0.2.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description LAN-Network
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map 10 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10 overload
ip nat inside source route-map 20 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.0.1.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.0.2.2
ip access-list extended DR-10240K-OutBound
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended DR-512K-OutBound
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map 10 permit 10
match ip address 100
match interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
route-map 20 permit 20
match ip address 100
match interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20
snmp-server community fnuro RO
control-plane
line con 0
logging synchronous
login local
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login local
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
endHi,
I would like to ask if you are done with your configuration? Is it working?
next month we will add an addition ISP and I will try to configure it?
Hope you'll give me some ideas.
thank you -
IP source based Load balancing?
Hi all;
We encounter the following issue:
A load balancer directs requests in a round robin mechanism to several servers. We want the load balancer direct requests based on the source IP addresses, so that the same host would be directed to the same server at each time it reaquests to be connected (reconnection). Is this possible when using CSM module knowing that NAT is implemented?
RegardsYes this is possible doing
vserver VAPP
virtual 10.1.1.11 tcp 2514
serverfarm SAPP
sticky 90 group 8
idle 5400
persistent rebalance
inservice
sticky 8 netmask 255.255.255.255 address source timeout 90
This should make the session sticky -
WAN round-robin load balancing
First things first, I just recently got that horrible distribution Gentoo off my machine and installed Arch for a test run and so far a flipping love it. Just like to thank everyone that made this wonderful piece of Linux.
To the point: I have a box with 3 NIC and it current runs as my LAN gateway. http://pastie.org/608016 is the script I use to do so and as you may have guessed eth0 is my DSL modem eth1 is my LAN switch, eth2 is my cable modem. Currently my LAN runs off just my DSL, if I want to change this and run off the cable I have to change WAN in the script to eth2 and run it. I would like to change this and have it round-robin load balance over my DSL, cable.
I tried
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth2 down
modprobe bonding mode=0 miimon=100
ifconfig bond0 10.0.0.5
ifenslave bond0 eth0
ifenslave bond0 eth2
inspired by http://ubuntulinuxhelp.com/how-to-use-t … -computer/ and that didn't work at all.
Then I had a look at http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Con … rk#bonding (two ip on two card) but that didn't really make sense to be as you're not specifying what interfaces to bond anywhere.
Could anyone help me?Let us first set some symbolical names. Let $IF1 be the name of the first interface (if1 in the picture above) and $IF2 the name of the second interface. Then let $IP1 be the IP address associated with $IF1 and $IP2 the IP address associated with $IF2. Next, let $P1 be the IP address of the gateway at Provider 1, and $P2 the IP address of the gateway at provider 2. Finally, let $P1_NET be the IP network $P1 is in, and $P2_NET the IP network $P2 is in.
One creates two additional routing tables, say T1 and T2. These are added in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. Then you set up routing in these tables as follows:
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table T1
ip route add default via $P1 table T1
ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 table T2
ip route add default via $P2 table T2
What does it mean by 'IP network' ($P*_NET)? -
I'm having a difficult time trying to configure load balancing on my CSM based on the URL entered. Here is my scenerio:
Two web servers (WebA & WebB), load balanced on a CSM. WebA & WebB have 90% the same content, so most traffic can be load balanced between them without a problem. The problem (for me anyway) comes in where WebA has certain web sites that WebB doesn't, and vice versa. So I need to load balance to both for 90% of the traffic, and point traffic to a particular server the other 10% of the time based on the URL entered.
Below is the test config I have so far (that doesn't work correctly), what I am trying for in this example is that any URL that contains /vhosts/ or /programs/ be directed to WebA, and any URL that contains /platform/ or /ssl/ be directed to WebB, and all other traffic be load balanced between the two evenly. (For testing purposes, the servers are being load balanced in "bridge-mode", in production they will be "routed-mode"....I did't want to go through the change controls to change the IP addresses for the test servers!).
module ContentSwitchingModule 2
vlan 605 client
ip address 10.63.240.4 255.255.255.0
gateway 10.63.240.1
vlan 606 server
ip address 10.63.240.4 255.255.255.0
natpool URL-POLICY-TEST 10.63.240.204 10.63.240.204 netmask 255.255.255.254
map SRV-A url
match protocol http url /vhosts/*
match protocol http url /programs/*
map SRV-B url
match protocol http url /platform/*
match protocol http url /ssl/*
serverfarm URL-POLICY-TEST
nat server
nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
real 10.40.109.100
inservice
real 10.40.109.101
inservice
serverfarm URL-TESTA
nat server
nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
real 10.40.109.100
inservice
serverfarm URL-TESTB
nat server
nat client URL-POLICY-TEST
real 10.40.109.101
inservice
policy TESTWEB-A
url-map SRV-A
serverfarm URL-TESTA
policy TESTWEB-B
url-map SRV-B
serverfarm URL-TESTB
vserver URL-POLICY_TEST
virtual 10.63.240.10 tcp 0
vlan 605
serverfarm URL-POLICY-TEST
sticky 1
persistent rebalance
slb-policy TESTWEB-A
slb-policy TESTWEB-B
inserviceThanks for the reply Gilles....I've been out of the office for a while.
Well, right now nothing is working....except that all traffic is going to the default server farm assinged to the vserver. Here are the URLs I am testing with:
**************TEST A************
http://10.63.240.10/manual/vhosts/fd-limits.xml
http://10.63.240.10/manual/programs/apachectl.xml
**************TEST B************
http://10.63.240.10/manual/platform/ebcdic.xml
http://10.63.240.10/manual/ssl/ssl_compat.xml
***************BOTH****************
http://10.63.240.10/manual/howto/htaccess.xml
http://10.63.240.10/manual/howto/cgi.xml
When I try attaching to the first URL for example, here is the connection info (I trimmed it down so it will fit here):
MOSL1S1A#sh mod csm 2 real
real server farm Conns/hits
10.40.109.100 URL-POLICY-TEST 1
10.40.109.101 URL-POLICY-TEST 0
10.40.109.100 URL-TESTA 0
10.40.109.101 URL-TESTB 0
MOSL1S1A#
MOSL1S1A#sh mod csm 2 conn
prot vlan source destination
In TCP 605 10.47.10.10:3738 10.63.240.10:80
Out TCP 605 10.40.109.101:80 10.63.240.204:8820
I've tried changing the syntax on the URL statement in the map as such:
/manual/*
*/manual/*
/manual/
*manual*
/manual* -
Two gateways, port-based load balancing
Hello,
I have a simple question on Mac OS X Leopard/SL Server regarding the use of 2 distinct internet connections on a single LAN.
Gateway #1 : 10.0.1.1 (delivering IPs) - 18 mbps
Gateway #2 : 10.0.1.254 - 4 mbps
Any computer accessing the network is delivered an IP by the DHCP server (10.0.1.1), thus uses #1 as of main gateway.
The main server (10.0.1.16) is running DNS services and a Squid proxy-cache.
Now, is it possible to set all the computers that connect to the network up so that they use the main server as of main gateway and see their requests redirected to #1 or #2 according to the port in use ?
For example:
mail,http,https,jabber -> #1
skype,rtsp,... -> #2
Thank you very much for your help
Tha
Message was edited by: Kwintinis it possible to set all the computers that connect to the network up so that they use the main server as of main gateway and see their requests redirected to #1 or #2 according to the port in use ?
No. routing is based on destination IP address, not port.
Therefore each client will send all traffic for a specific address to a specific router address. It doesn't matter whether it's talking HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, POP, AIM, or any other protocol - any traffic for that IP will go to the same router.
You have three ways of getting around this.
One is to install a router that supports dual WAN connections. Point all internal clients to the LAN address of the router and let it do the work of routing the traffic as needed, based on its routing policies (routers may be able to route based on port).
Option two is to setup a proxy server for specific services - for example you could setup a HTTP/HTTPS proxy server on a machine that has router #1 as its default gateway and configure the clients to talk to router #2. All traffic on the clients will go over router #2 except the proxied traffic which will go to the proxy and then out via router #1.
This is relatively simple to setup, but is limited to traffic that can be easily proxied (e.g. that probably excludes email).
The third option is static routing. Look at the servers each machine is contacting and setup static routes for the smaller set of addresses. For example, if you're only splitting off traffic to Skype's servers then set each client with a default route of router #1, and static routes to Skype's server to router #2. Now all traffic except that to Skype will use router #1.
This is really only viable if you have a relatively small number of destination addresses you're trying to divert. That's why it works well for Skype (single server address), but wouldn't work well for something more generic such as 'web traffic' since you cannot predict which web servers (and therefore which IP addresses) need static routes.
Of the three options, only option #1 will cover all protocols for all clients, but it's also the only option that costs $$s if your current router doesn't support multiple WAN interfaces. -
Dual WLAN links with load balancing and failover
Hello,
I am in a scenario where I am in need of two WLAN links between two buildings. There is a distance of 100-150 meters and minimum bandwidth required for both links together is 300Mbit/s. The thing is that both links should use load balancing between them and if one of them goes down, the last one should act as fail over.
I have been looking at Cisco Aironet 1550 Series though I have no idea what is needed to get load balancing and fail over to work, so I am searching here for suggestions on what equipment is needed.
Something like this:
---------------WLAN Link 150-300Mbit/s-----------
Building Load balancing and fail over Building
---------------WLAN Link 150-300Mbit/s-----------
Thanks in advance!Several points.
When an AP is doing 300Mbps, that's NOT the real throughput you have. It's the data rate at which traffic is sent.
All in all, if your AP/client are doing 300MBps association, you will see max 150Mbps with a file transfer.
From there, I'm not even sure that 11n supports dual spatial streams over such long distances (you can't have multipath in open air) so afaik the 1550 only do 150Mbps association rate (=dual channel with one spatial stream). That means 75Mbps real speed.
I couldn't test a 1550 yet so don't take my word for official statement but that's what I'm thinking.
the wireless links will always be both up and they can be on different channels.
That will then mean that it will be "as if" the remote switch was connected directly to the central switch (where WLC is connected) as the WLC tunnels traffic all the way. So you could do a spanning-tree config on this one I guess to block the port onthe remote switch.
Regards,
Nicolas -
Linksys RV042 Dual Wan with Load Balancing Help?
Good day,
I'm a newbie to routers. I have purchased a Linksys RV042 hoping I could connect my two modem and provide internet to my collegues in the camp. My internet connection is running under EAP-TLS using a Motorola modem from Go Telecom here in Saudi Arabia. Need help to configure the router to accept the two modem.
Thanks for the reply.....Hello David,
Glad you could spend some time with my problem. Tried the solution you sent but still unsuccesful to connect to internet. Is there something wrong with the WAN credentials I'm using? Do I have to switch the mode from Gateway to Router? Please take a look at my WAN1 values that I wrote in the RV042
I am using a Motorola CPE outdoor Wimax modem from GO Telacom here in Saudi Arabia... -
New RV042 router with latest Firmware update installed.
Two restaurants on the same LAN subnet, one POS terminal PC at each restaurant for on-line resrvation system.
LAN connection allows each restaurant to view reservations for the other.
Comcast ISP with Static IPs and Comcast/SMC gateway in bridge mode (Comcast Gateway WAN IP = 50.###.###.134, LAN IP = 192.168.10.1).
LAN port 1 on Comcast Gateway connected to WAN1 on RV042 (WAN1 IP = 50.###.###.133).
LAN port 2 on Comcast Gateway connected to WAN2 on RV042 (WAN2 IP = 50.###.###.132).
RV042 LAN IP = 10.1.10.1.
Restaurant A POS PC IP - 10.1.10.201 (static).
Restaurant B POS PC IP - 10.1.10.202 (static).
OpenTable online reservation system needs 5 inbound port ranges forwarded to each terminal PC for the OpenTable interface.
For Restaurant A OpenTable sends to 50.###.###.133.
For Restaurant B OpenTable sends to 50.###.###.132.
We setup RV042 Firewall "Access Rules" specifying the appropriate source interface (WAN1/WAN2) with source set to ANY and the appropriate destination (10.1.10.201/10.1.10.202) for the 5 port ranges (so 10 rules in all, 5 per restaurant)
However this is not working for either restaurant.
OpenTable cannot interface with the termianl PCs on the specified ports.
If we add the port range forwarding under the "Forwarding" section of the RV042 setup (which limits us to seting it up for only one of the restaurants) the OpenTable interface works for the one restaurant.
What are we missing????David,
I pretty sure on this model router we can't specify the inbound port address to be forwarded from specified WAN port (it's catch all). It doesn't give us the ability to choose this in port forwarding or Upnp forward. Now if you can separate the ranges that needs to be forward to each server say SERVER 1 1000-1005 and ports 1006-1010 to SERVER 2.
if you are needed to specify which wan port on your fowarding then you'll need to move up to a different router.
SA520,SA520W or SA540
Jasbryan -
Hi friends,
This is regarding I am facing issue with configuring the load balancing in cisco rv042 .I had configured the load balancing between dual wan of leased line and adsl coonection but loadbalancing is not working fine kindly help me on thisIf i close one link it takes 20 seconds of downtime and then ping goes without loses.
In the end i decided to go with PBR, since the deadline for our project was surpassed.
I set up acl that matched every other 32 adress block:
10 permit ip 192.168.100.32 0.0.0.31 any
20 permit ip 192.168.100.96 0.0.0.31 any
30 permit ip 192.168.100.160 0.0.0.31 any
40 permit ip 192.168.100.224 0.0.0.31 any
50 deny ip any any
Set a route map that sends that traffic trough one of the interfaces (Gi0/1) and let routing do the rest:
track 1 interface dialer 0 line-protocol
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/1 10
Its not exactly what i wanted but its close enough:)
Thanks for your advices.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I created a simlpe report. When I call it from the button in my form, I would like to have acrobat pop up and display it on the screen. So far, when the user clicks the button, my form creates the a pdf file with the report on it. But it does not ope
-
I Just bought an iTunes card from the store and I went to go buy a game and it's saying my purchase can not be made please go to iTunes support. But this keeps happening and I can only download free apps no apps that cost money and I did looked it up
-
How do I make an app running in the background appear in the dock?
I've tried searching the rest of the web, but all I can find is how to pin an app to the dock. I already know how to do that. What I want to do is make an app that doesn't appear even when it's running (my specific case is SugarSync) appear as an ico
-
My old computer has broken and I have replaced it with a new one. I have the latest version of Itunes on the new one, which is running windows 8. Old music which was already on the IPOD, and any purchases through Itunes appear on both the IPOD and t
-
AHH! FLOATING AUDIO METER FAILS TO REGISTER EACH FRAME'S LEVEL!
I have a problem regarding the floating audio meter - ie, the small 2 track meter that usually sits next to the tools strip in the standard window setup. For some reason, when I scroll along clips in my timeline (using the left/right arrow keys) it d