S_ALR_87012994 - Orders: Current Period/Cumulativec-Int Orders

Hi,
I am looking to understand the report S_ALR_87012994 - Orders: Current Period/Cumulative,
Can someone tell me what the following fields mean in the report
Act.to prv,     Act. ***.,      Ttl actual
Thanks,
Ram
Message was edited by:
        Ram R
Message was edited by:
        Ram R

Hi  Experts,
This info really helped and now I am stuck in Transports.
I went to GRR1, created new u2018Z_report_pgmu2019 by copying from relevant Library and Report program. Added Company Code in Report Painter & save.
In GR22, choose relevant Report Group and maintain header text Report
In SE93,  created Transaction code u2018Z_std_pgm*u2019  with u2018D_SREPOVARI-REPORTTYPEu2019 and value u2019RWu2019 & u2018D_SREPOVARI-REPORTu2019 and value u2018Reportgroup nameu2019.
To Transport this report group,GR52, goto Utilities->Transport->Transport Request Select 'Report Group' radio button click 'Execute'.  In the next screen enter report group and execute, In the next screen select the check box  for the report group  and click execute Then it asked for the transport request.
But there was an error in the QA system. May be I missed transporting the 'Z_Report name'.
Should i do it from GR52  ?  if not kindly advise.
Please help me in this final step

Similar Messages

  • Which Product Costing is most used By order, By Period, By Sales Order?

    Hi,
    As you know there are three types of product costing.
    Product Cost by Order
    Product Cost by Period
    Product Cost by Sales Order
    May i know which product costing method is widely used in the industries?

    Hi Vijay,
    Looks like your working on MTO and MTS pocess.I am new to Make To Order and Make to Stock controlling process and client like to implement Make To Order with SD integration. have you worked on these processes? Please explain me what is Make to Order and Make to Stock Process in Controlling (SAP-CO) and configuration in CO.
    If you can provide process design documents and configuration documents to me.
    anusha.r3 at gmail
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anusha

  • Report for internal order - year/period comparison

    I want to create a report for internal orders with year/period (from/to) comparison.
    For the present year/period i'm using CCA variables  1YRPERF (Fiscal Year/Period From) and 1YRPERT (Fiscal Year/Period To), created from field FISCPER, table RWCOOM.
    Now i want to creat a column fot the n-1 period (example: if selected current period as 009.2013 to 008.2014 the n-1 period will be 009.2012 to 008.2013), any suggestion what can I do about this?
    Regards
    Carlos Aguiar

    Hi Ajay
    This is for higher education institution that have to report by fiscal year (01-12 months) and by academic year (09.year1 to 08.year2). I have two maps to do this but the challenge is to have a unique map that by dates could retreive both information.
    I need a to have a column giving the total for example the Per/Yr 009.2012 to 008.2013 and other column with the Per/Yr -1.
    I've tried your first option but doesen't work at all because don't work with a period like 009.2013 to 008.2014. Then i made some adjustments: first column was setted to Yr (variable: 6-GJAHV to 6-GJAHB) and Per (variables: 1NPERIV to 1NPERIB). The second column was setted with Yr (variable: 6-GJAH2 to 6-GJAH2) and Per (variables: 1NPERIV to 1NPERIB). Seems to work with a few tests!
    Also i tried to creat new variables "1YRPERF" / "1YRPERT" to n-1, but had some problems with formula.
    1YRPERF have a formula: '#S012-999' and 1YRPERT formula is: '#S012'.
    To 1YRPERF-1 i've defined the formula '1YRPERF' -1, and for the Per to the formula '1YRPERT' -1, but seems to consider minus 1 period that the entry period. I've tried with -12 but didn't work too.
    Thatk's for the help!
    Regards, Carlos

  • Commitment report for limit order - by period

    I am not sure whether this query should falls under this category or Finance. So, please let me know if you think that this question should be moved to the Finance section.
    Anyway, my query is I have created a limit/framework purchase order from period 01.10.2008 to 31.11.2008. The delivery date is set to 01.10.2008 by default by the system. When I run the cost center commitment report for period 01.10.2008 to 31.11.2008, I can see the commitments for this PO. However, if I change the period to be from 01.11.208 to 31.11.2008, the commitments are no longer shown on the report. It seems that the system is using the delivery date as the date to show the commitments. Is it correct to say that this is standard behavior? Is there a way to show the commitments running through the validity period set in the PO rather than by the delivery date? Anyone has other options relating to this?
    Interested to hear your comments on this.
    Cheers!
    SF

    hi,
    As per my knowledge the delivery date shown by the system comes from the planned delivery date entered at the material master record...You can check the MMR in MM03...
    Pls check ....this would be the one reason...
    hope it helps..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Production order settlement period

    Dear Friends,
      I have settled my production order in period 4 (Let us assume). After some time ( let us assume 15 days) i wants to reverse my order. But by the time of 15 days my period has been changed from 4 to 5. I have forgotten on which period that particular order has been settled, so that i can reverse the order on the same period.
    Could anybody guide me , How to display production order settlement period?
    Thanks
    Senthil

    Hi Mahesh,
      I could not find any period related information under change management option.
    But i have found the information under "Header----Settlement rule". Here we can find the details about settlement period (First used and last used).
    Thanks
    Senthil

  • Error message "order currently being processed" in print order thru IW37N

    Hi,
    I am getting error messages "order currently being proceesed by same user" & " material reservation for order being processed" when i am trying to take print of work order using t-code IW37N putting multiple orders. But I am able to take print then also. I am not able  to understand why this message is coming before print comes out..I have not opened any more same transaction also on the screen.
    I am getting this error message very frequently for other open orders also.
    Plse suggest what can be the reason ?
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Apart from standard shop papers selection 2010, 2020, 2030 if you define new like 3030 or 4040 and assigned with any custom program to print server system will issue this message.
    Please check the standard config via transaction OIDF
    Thanks
    S.N

  • SNP heuristic error maximum number of orders per period reached

    Hello All,
    I am getting one strange error "APO SNP heuristic error maximum number of orders per period reached (000000040)"
    Product XXX/ Location XXX: Maximum number of orders per period reached (000000040)
    For the problem : PPDS heuristic is working fine, while running the SNP heuristic I am getting this problem.
    Please let me know asap.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Kind Regards,
    Santosh

    There is a section in the IMG where you can change this behaviour.
    in SPRO - SAP SCM - IMG
    -> Advanced Planning and Optimisation
      -> Supply Chain Planning
        -> Supply Network Planning (SNP)
           -> Basic Settings
              -> Maintain Global SNP Settings
    You will see the field "Heu.: Orders per Bkt" which should have the value of 40 in there, e.g. the limit to the number of orders SNP can raise in any planning bucket.
    If you raise this number (to say 100) then hopefully your message will no longer be issued by the system.
    Alternatively, you can check the cause of why the system is rasing so many orders. For example, check the lot size that the Product has for that location (lot-for-lot will create an order for every demand for example).
    Hopr that helps
    Regards
    Ian

  • Constant "Your account currently has a pending order." that will not go away.

    Hello,
    I have an issue where I can't make changes to services and/or equipment on My Verizon online account. I constantly receive a message saying "Your account currently has a pending order." when I attempt to make changes. I receive the following message:
                     Your account currently has a pending order.
                     You can check the status of your pending order by visiting
                     What's Next.
                     To make a change to your order, please contact us:
                     1 800-VERIZON (1 800-837-4966)
    I have worked with more than 2 different Verizon representatives on this issue and they just offer to make changes to my account after I have frustrating told them that I do not wish to make any changes. I just want the functionality to make changes to my services and/or equipment to return to my account. I have seen numerous posts about this issue in this forum so I'm hoping that by posting in here I can FINALLY receive the proper resolution to my issue.
    Please someone help me!

    Hi crispinb,
    Sorry you are having difficulty. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue. Please remember to check your spam/junk folder if you do not hear from an agent.

  • Old ISBN used for New Titles MM to CO - Int Order - Amoratization Query

    Dear Gurus
    Kindly need some assistance on the issue, now sure if its the right forum - Regarding transferring Production order to CO Order Int Order Amoratisation Query.
    The business have unfortunately reused over 40 material when they should have created new ones.
    From an MM viewpoint it is not advised reusing materials. New material numbers should have been created. However as stock has now been receipted and sold it is not possible to use a new material number.
    These materials originally had stock transferred from other materials onto batch and valuation 01. This was fully sold but now the Business have re used the materials with a new description and a new Production Order created.
    Because stock was previously transferred onto batch 01  via - old prod order it appears the business have created the Production orders for batch 02 which has been Goods receipted against. However the business have added the costs to an Internal order batch 01 not 02.
    So essentially our batch and valuation numbers for the production order and internal order are out of sync. Would this cause a problem.
    I believe the Business want to know if the goods receipt they have done against Production order 02 viewed via MMBE - Stock Balances will trigger the amortisation of the costs on First cost order 01 Internal Order.
    Because the production has already been sold and GR, we will need to look for a solution going forward, so the business does not encounter this problem again.
    Thanks
    Rick
    Edited by: Rick Desilva on Jan 26, 2011 9:05 PM

    Dear Gurus
    Kindly need some assistance on the issue, now sure if its the right forum - Regarding transferring Production order to CO Order Int Order Amoratisation Query.
    The business have unfortunately reused over 40 material when they should have created new ones.
    From an MM viewpoint it is not advised reusing materials. New material numbers should have been created. However as stock has now been receipted and sold it is not possible to use a new material number.
    These materials originally had stock transferred from other materials onto batch and valuation 01. This was fully sold but now the Business have re used the materials with a new description and a new Production Order created.
    Because stock was previously transferred onto batch 01  via - old prod order it appears the business have created the Production orders for batch 02 which has been Goods receipted against. However the business have added the costs to an Internal order batch 01 not 02.
    So essentially our batch and valuation numbers for the production order and internal order are out of sync. Would this cause a problem.
    I believe the Business want to know if the goods receipt they have done against Production order 02 viewed via MMBE - Stock Balances will trigger the amortisation of the costs on First cost order 01 Internal Order.
    Because the production has already been sold and GR, we will need to look for a solution going forward, so the business does not encounter this problem again.
    Thanks
    Rick
    Edited by: Rick Desilva on Jan 26, 2011 9:05 PM

  • Planning internal orders by period

    Hi all,
    Can any one tell me how to plan internal orders by periods. I would really aapreciate step by step configuration with Trxn codes.
    Thanks
    Points wull be rewarded.

    Refer below links:
    WBS- Integrated Excel Planning
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ProjectSystem-ExcelbasedCostPlanning
    Though the links talk about WBS planning, principle for IO should be the same.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Current period in Accounting 1 view of Material Master

    Dear Experts,
    In Accounting 1 view of Material Master there is a current period, now it is 12 2009.
    Is it possible to make it 11 2009, if yes how to do it.
    Please help if you have solution. it is very crucial for me.
    Thank you for your support.
    Regards,
    Zusen

    Hi,
    Please read the Solution part of  note 487381. There is still a few things need to be carry out before you can proceed
    with the initialization :
    Bear in mind that the initialization of a posting period has the
    following effects concerning the period stocks:
        o  The initialization of the posting period to a previous or to any
           posting period may lead to the loss of the information of the
           inventory balances of the previous periods.The book value of the
           current posting period is taken as the basis also for values of
           the previous period in this case.
           If you want to continue working with this new posting period, in
           addition you should execute report Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES attached so
           that history entries greater or equal to the new posting period
           will be deleted.
        o  If you have to briefly reset the posting period by one period
           (for example, postings must still be posted in a certain period)
           just to make a correction (and for a small number of postings),
           you should initialize the posting period back again to the old
           value so that the values of the previous period will not be lost
           (you should forbid postings when carrying out corrections).
           However, afterwards the values of the previous period or the
           history records (as of Release 4.5) of the materials posted in
           this case are inaccurate.
           You should NOT execute report Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES in this case.
        o  However, if the posting period is generally reset again to a
           previous posting period and if postings were made during this
           time, all information on the inventory balance of the previous
           periods is lost.
           As of Release 4.5a, you should use the cited correction report
        Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES in order to delete history records that are
        more current than the current posting period.Otherwise, it can
        result in deviations (inconsistencies) for the update of the
        history records.
    o  Important! If there are open physical inventory documents that
        have status 'counted' or for which indicator 'Freeze inventory
        balance' has been set, you should reject these if they refer to a
        previous period or have been created in the former previous
        period.The inventory difference to be posted can be determined
        from the current book value of the previous period and the book
        quantity frozen in the physical inventory document (ISEG-BUCHM)
        and does not match the inventory balance of the previous period
        that is currently valid.

  • Current period time vs previous period time

    Hi All,
    I have to create a report which compare the sales period time..
    for example variable 0calmonth period 0108 - 0208
    product  |  current period  0108 / 0208  |  previous period 0107 / 0207   |  current - previous
    TV        |      1000                              |            500                            |   500
    Audio    |      100                               |             300                            |  -200
    its work great
    but when I add 0calmonth in column query
    product  |  current period  0108 - 0208  |  previous period 0107 - 0207   |  current - previous
    0107
    0207
    0108
    0208
    0107
    0207
    0108
    0208
    0107
    0207
    0108
    0208
    TV           |     0   |     0  |  800   |  200     |  300    |   200 |    0      |    0    |   -300 |   -200 |  800    |  200   |
    Audio    |     0   |     0  |  70   |     30     |  150    |   150 |    0      |    0    |   -150 |   -150 |  70      |    30   |
    This is not what i want.
    I want this.
    product  |  current period  0108 - 0208  |  previous period 0107 - 0207   |  current - previous
    0108
    0208
    0107
    0207
    0108-0107
    0208-0207
    TV        |   800                     |  200     |  300                           |   200   |   500           |  0              |
    Audio    |    70                     |     30     |  150                          |   150    |   -80           |   -120         |
    How do that?

    Hi,
    I think there is a way to do this, take normally first 4 fields, product | current period 0108 - 0208 | previous period 0107 - 0207 | current - previous
    Then remove 0CALMONTH from columns and after that create a RKF by new selection, using sales Keyfig. with 0CALMONTH resticted to the value 0108, and next take a new selection and restrict the same with 0208.
    Similarly restrict for remaining months also (0107  0207  0108-0107  0208-0207 ) so that it can be arranged in the order u want.
    Hope this helps.
    Rgs,
    I.R.K

  • Adding Sales Order Lines repeating for all orders

    I have a C# program whereby I am trying to get Sales Orders from one database (source) and create them in another database (destination). I asked a question on how to set the current line and was helped.
    The only problem now is that for all Business Partners, the lines being added are all the same (i.e. with the same row numbers and details as the first Sales Order to be entered)
    Source database (TCount represents the number of lines in the document & the DocNum each separate sales order)
    Destination database (compare columns with above)
    As you can see the rows of Source docnum 6 are repeated in the destination table always
    How can I fix it so that it adds the sales orders properly? My code snippet below:
    unaddedSOs = sList.Except(dList).ToList();
                // Add the Sales Orders that are missing to destination database
                SAPbobsCOM.Documents sboSO = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)oCompanyDestination.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oOrders);
                if (unaddedSOs.Count > 0)
                    // Loop through unadded Sales Orders
                    foreach (var item in unaddedSOs)
                        // Set properties of the Sales Order object
                        sboSO.CardCode = item.cardCode;
                        sboSO.CardName = item.cardName;
                        sboSO.DocDate = item.docDate;
                        sboSO.DocDueDate = item.docDueDate;
                        // Add Sales Order Document Lines
                        SAPbobsCOM.Recordset rsLines = oCompanySource.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset);
                        // Get Sales Orders from source database                   
                        rsLines.DoQuery("SELECT ItemCode, Quantity, Price FROM RDR1 WHERE DocEntry = '" + item.docNum + "'");
                        rsLines.MoveFirst();
                        if (rsLines.RecordCount > 0)
                            int row = 0;
                            while (!rsLines.EoF)
                                sboSO.Lines.SetCurrentLine(row);
                                sboSO.Lines.ItemCode = rsLines.Fields.Item("ItemCode").Value;
                                sboSO.Lines.Quantity = rsLines.Fields.Item("Quantity").Value;
                                sboSO.Lines.Price = rsLines.Fields.Item("Price").Value;
                                sboSO.Lines.Add();
                                rsLines.MoveNext();
                                row++;
                        // Try to add the Sales Order to the database        
                        int lRetCode = sboSO.Add();
                        if (lRetCode != 0)
                            int temp_int = lErrorCode;
                            string temp_string = sErrorMsg;
                            oCompanyDestination.GetLastError(out temp_int, out temp_string);
                            // Incase adding a Sales Order failed
                            if (lErrorCode != -4006)
                                // Display error message
                                MessageBox.Show(lErrorCode + " " + sErrorMsg);
                MessageBox.Show("Syncing Complete!!!");
    Any help appreciated,
    Regards Kinyanjui

    Hi Kinyanjui,
    Are you using the same SO for all unadded orders?
    unaddedSOs = sList.Except(dList).ToList();
    // Add the Sales Orders that are missing to destination database
    if (unaddedSOs.Count > 0)
        // Loop through unadded Sales Orders
        foreach (var item in unaddedSOs)
            SAPbobsCOM.Documents sboSO = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)oCompanyDestination.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oOrders);
            // Set properties of the Sales Order object
            sboSO.CardCode = item.cardCode;
            sboSO.CardName = item.cardName;
            sboSO.DocDate = item.docDate;
            sboSO.DocDueDate = item.docDueDate;
            // Add Sales Order Document Lines
            SAPbobsCOM.Recordset rsLines = oCompanySource.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset);
            // Get Sales Orders from source database               
            rsLines.DoQuery("SELECT ItemCode, Quantity, Price FROM RDR1 WHERE DocEntry = '" + item.docNum + "'");
            rsLines.MoveFirst();
            if (rsLines.RecordCount > 0)
                int row = 0;
                while (!rsLines.EoF)
                    sboSO.Lines.SetCurrentLine(row);
                    sboSO.Lines.ItemCode = rsLines.Fields.Item("ItemCode").Value;
                    sboSO.Lines.Quantity = rsLines.Fields.Item("Quantity").Value;
                    sboSO.Lines.Price = rsLines.Fields.Item("Price").Value;
                    sboSO.Lines.Add();
                    rsLines.MoveNext();
                    row++;
            // Try to add the Sales Order to the database     
            int lRetCode = sboSO.Add();
            if (lRetCode != 0)
                int temp_int = lErrorCode;
                string temp_string = sErrorMsg;
                oCompanyDestination.GetLastError(out temp_int, out temp_string);
                // Incase adding a Sales Order failed
                if (lErrorCode != -4006)
                    // Display error message
                    MessageBox.Show(lErrorCode + " " + sErrorMsg);
            Marshal.ReleaseComObject(sboSO);
            GC.Collect();
    MessageBox.Show("Syncing Complete!!!");
    Best regards,
    Pedro Magueija

  • Creating java program that orders 3 numbers in ascending order using if els

    Does anyone know what code to use for creating a java program that uses the if else operators to order 3 variables in ascending order?

    nar0122 wrote:
    correct on the homework assumption...you have a good nose...the thing is...i know i need to make an if statement saying if a is less than b, and a is less than c...print a first...but how do i get it to "print a" first? if a is less than c and b...and so on for b and c? sorry if that was confusing...
    int a = ..., b = ..., c = ...;
    if(a > b AND a > c) {
      print a
      if(b > c) {
        print b, print c
      } else {
        print c, print b
    etc.

  • GR for Purchase order and GI for prod. order simultaneously

    Hi Guys,
    My client current has an external system, which does both GR for puchase order and GI for Prod. order at the same time. He is now migrating into SAP and he wants the same functionality. Do you have any idea how to do this.
    For eg., Pick list(CO27) will pick and issue the components to production order, if the component is in inventory. if it is not there, it will give error.
    Can we add, if material is not there, it should do GR and GI. is it possible with any customer exit in CO27?
    Thanks
    Srini

    Hi,
    In KANBAN, we have the possibility to do the GR (Goods Invard) if th container is Full and GI (to the production Order) if the Container is Empty.
    It's just a thaught..
    Regards,
    Siva

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to get your pictures and contacts from one device to another

    hey guys I just bought an iphone 5s and I wanted to transfer all my photos and contacts from my old iphone which was a 4s to my 5s. when I tried to do it first time a message appeared on my computer and said that it couldn't transfer anything because

  • Need help with Photoshop Element 8

    I have never used this software and I am having trouble with what i am trying to do.  I would like to convert a photo to black and white and then just add one color to a particular item or area.  Please help

  • Oracle Essbase not starting up

    Hi, We are having issues with oracle essbase server in our oracle Hyperion planning system. The ./opmncl startall process gives below error. checked OPMN log and it says, JVM initialization and singleserver signon are succesfull. However, i see error

  • Sus usage

    Dear sap gurus, We are in srm 7 ehp 2 with ecc 6 ehp 5 and we're planning to use classic scenario with sus. In srm, we plan to use rfx as well. So my question is if we also use sus, does it mean that our cendor need to logon to srm system to respond

  • Uninstall Adobe Application Manager

    Ever since I downloaded Adobe Application Manager my computer has experienced major problems.  My windows explorer has all but stopped working, random notices that my copy of windows is not genuine, and I cannot edit anything in word without the appl