Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

Dear experts,
We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard i.e.
1) Creation of valuation type
2) Creation of valuation category
3) Assignment of cat. and type.
4) Local definition.
5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
6) Extend material with valuation type.
What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
Now here is issue.-
I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
Please suggest.
With best regards,
Manish K. Bachate

Hi
You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
> To summarize, what I am recommending is this
> 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
> 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
> 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
With this
1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
Hope this helps!!
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Material Ledger with Split Valuation Type 'X' with FIFO

Hi,
The requirement from the customer is to have Raw Material, Intermediary and Finished Products valued at Actuals and on a FIFO basis. According to me, this is possible only if we activate Material Ledger, have batch split valuation u2018Xu2019 as the valuation type and have a batch search strategy which does a FIFO. Are there any technical issues with this solution? Or is there a better solution? Is any organisation ever using this solution for a similar requirement? As an extension of this requirement, how does commodity trading companies running in SAP handle their inventory and COGS valuation?
Thanks and Regards
Shivram.

Hi,
Using Material Ledger with batch management and split valuation of each batch ("X") leads to most aaccurate FIFO valuation result, however, depending on how many material and batch the customer has, huge number of materials will be processed and it will affect the performance issues. You should check the number and expected period-end time frame scheduling at least.
Financial responsible tell you to need this kind of solution (detailed FIFO calculation)?
They usualy needs to get simple FIFO valuation, meaning they don't care each individual logistic material movement as FIFO, but only care of periodic FIFO. I know, it depends on Finacial responsibes or their auditors, so it's also not general.
Please double-check the new FIFO valuation function for Material Ledger with using Periodic Closing and AVR. Some information is in SAP Note 1431829 and 1247053. Related transactions are there, CKLMBB_xxxx under Actual Costing/Material Ledger -> Balance Sheet Valuation Procedures. I couldn't find any official documents for Material Ledger + FIFO valuation (like Release Notes).
Hope this will be an additional option to yours.
Best regards, Takashi

MRP run including Alternative BOM & Routing in sequence.

Dear Experts,
My client has maintained alternative BOM & Routing for there In house production materials.He wants to execute MRP run which can include all BOM's & Routing in sequence. Like, first MRP run should check material requirements as per first alternative followed with second & third alternatives.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Dear Rajesh,
ur req is not possible in that way. coz MRP run select only one PV or BOM and routing at a time and if stock is not available then it will genrate the req.
You can try with this rather craeating an alteranative BOM create alternative group of material so when u run the MRP system will check the stock of first matrial and if short fall is there it will go for next.
Regards
Sachin

Document Type of PR in MRP Run

Dear All,
While Creating PR in MD01 or MD03, system is picking PR document "NB" but i want it must be pic other PR document type for e.g. ZNB.
How can this be achieve ?
REgards,
Pardeep Malik

Hi,
Please assign the customized Document type at MRP groups level,
SPRO --> Production --> Material Requirement Planning --> MRP Groups --> Carry Out Overall Maintenance of MRP Groups.
Regards
Srinivas.P

Problem about Valuation Type For MRP

Dear all,
I am managing our materials by valuation type.
But, when I run MRP for these materials, I do not know which specific about valuation type.
Can you help me?
Thanks all
TINDT

As per my best knowledge in standard system you cannot force MRP to manage (plan) your goods based on valuation type.
In case of configurable materials you can do separate planning:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/75/504853a39a11d191930000e8a5f6e6/frameset.htm
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 5, 2010 10:06 AM
(If you are saying that the valuation type is not defaulted, please reade OSS note 15297)
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 5, 2010 10:10 AM

FIFO valuation at period end + consideration of valuation type

Hi,
I use FIFO valuation to valuate my raw materials at period end.
Some raw materials are split valuated, e.g. the same material number can have valuation type NEW or REP (repaired). All material movements (e.g. goods receipt) happen for each valuation type at different cost (REP is much cheaper than NEW). Also purchase orders are created at movement type level.
Unfortunately FIFO valuation does not work based on valuation type. Thus the FIFO value can be a wrong mixture of valuation type values for each material.
Example: Starting with zero quantity/value at period begin
Posting date
Movement type
Valuation type
Quantity
PO-Value/MAP
05.07.2014
101
NEW
500
500 EUR
10.07.2014
101
REP
1000
100 EUR
15.07.2014
261
REP
-500
-50 EUR
Total at period end
1000
550 EUR
The stock value of this 1000 items is 550 EUR, the 500 items NEW have a value of 500 EUR, the 500 items REP have a value of 50 EUR.
FIFO result:
The 1000 items at month end are FIFO valuated based on the last goods receipt happend on 10.07.2014 which is exactly 1000 items (not considering the different valuation types).
Thus the FIFO value is only 100 EUR although the correct value should be 550 EUR.
I didn’t find a solution in SAP standard (FIFO related table MYMP does not contain BWTAR (valuation type) whereas table MYMFT does but its always empty in my case), but is there a solution for that case, maybe I missed it in some EhP’s?
Best regards, Christian

Hi,
There is no such normal MRP run.
Whenever we take MRP run, system will consider only the main material and not the split valuation type.
THe main concept of using split valuation is only for that itself. It is there for planning irrespective of valuation type.
But if you want the system to behaive in such fashion that it should plan one part and not he other then use different material code instead of split valuation. Define these two material codes as alternative and give the usage probability as 0% and 100%. MRP will consider only that material which is having 100% usage probability.
Regards
Amit Parkhi

SPLIT VALUATION - EXT/INT PO Indicator- OMWC

Hi,
     Could someone help me understanding this?
     While Configuring Split Valuation, for a Valuation Type I've set the 'EXT PO' indicator as '0' and associated it to a Valuation Category( No default Valuation Type has been set). After associating the Valuation Category and the Valuation Types to a material, I tried creating a PO for the same. It allowed me to create a PO, with the Valuation Type for which the EXT PO is set as '0'.
What I inferred from the settings is that it should have thorwn an error. Have I inferred correctly or else am missing out somewhere. Also, please help me to understand the significance of 'Acct Category Reference' in 'OMWC' Tcode (P.S: Could appreciate the use of Acct Categ Ref in Automatic Account Determination ie Valuation Class determination. But the Significance of Acct Categ Ref. in Split Valuation Type still remains vague.)
TIA,
Regards,
S. Satish

Hi Prabhu,
Thank You very much for your time.
                  The Valuation Type is as follows
                   INDI     EXT PO Indicator '0'.
                The Valuation type 'INDI', got defaulted from the Inforecord in the PO created. The PO is a standard PO.
              Since for 'INDI', the EXT PO is set as '0', ie Not allowed, should I expect an error in this case ( In actual it did not occur. I            suppose it should. Correct me if am wrong).
Acct category Reference is concerned:
     Is it that the Acct Category Reference chosen in the Valuation Type configuration, would surpass the Acct Category ref set for the Material Type?
Ie) if the Acct category ref for 'ROH' is say 0001. If I assign this Material Type for a material and still could I assign a Valuation Category associated to say HALB ( I know in real time, its not possible. But would like to understand if the system validates).
Regards,
S. Satish

Repeated purchase req. in MRP run procudure

Dear SAP experts,
Here at my client site, i have one scenario of mrp run of consumables.They maintain safety stock in material master MRP view,
I am using MRP type PD.Now after MRP run,system creates purchase requisition as per safety stock qty,( consider initial stock
is zero) now when i convert Purchase requisition into purchase order. i refresh the MD04 list, as soon as i refresh i get the
purchase req. converted into PO item.Upto this point its ok. but during this refresh function i get repeated purchase requisition
of the same quantity as previous one..Why this is happening? any specific reason behind this? my logic is not getting clear.
please assist me to find exact reason..
Thanx in advance..
Regards,
Ravi

HI
If the initial stock is zero then system will generate the PR for the safety stock also and then for the Dependent requirement.
Check and revert
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Split valuation

Dear All,
Will split valuation of the material also address the below points. I have 2 valuation types with me as "X" & "Y" with the same material code.
1. I need the split valuation type either "X" or "Y" to be printed on my Purchase order.
2. Report/list of consumption of "X" & "Y" materials separately on the balance sheet.
3. Separate storage and stock identification in SAP for the split valuation types "X" & "Y".
4. Report the list of materials with split valuation type either "X" or "Y" seperately.
Are the above requirements possible.If so how? Pl guide me.
Thanks in advance.
Aditya

Hi,
1)Possible ,You will have to modify your PO Pront program accordingly
2) Report and list of consumption as per valuation type available in STD.SAP reports may be some financial reports you amy need to modify to suit your reqmt.
3)You will have to identify these storage locations yourself physically in system stock will be shown seperately as per valuation type
4)All reports are available in std.SAP as per split valuation
check transaction SAP1 or any SAP menu reports
Hope its clear to you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

How to know if a MRP run element is using Quota Arrangement and lot size?

Hi all,
Two questions:
A) How to determine if a source is actually pulled from Quota Arrangement?
I am wondering if there is anyway from ABAP table or from Transaction (i.e. Purchasing Order) in which the source is pulled from a Quota Arrangement?
We use scheduling agreement, PIR and source list, and as well as Quota Arrangement for our purchasing.
I just want to know how, from system (table and transaction), to find out the source is from quota, not from PIR or others.
B) Quota Arrangement still can work properly if lot-size procedure's splitting quota indicator not Checked?
If my the lot-size procedure which I am using for a material does not activate the splitting quota indicator, it means split quota will not work during MRP run.
But does this also mean that quota arrangement will not be working for this particular material even if I have create a a quota arrangement object (via MEQ1) for this material?
Thanks
Daniel

Tomek,
If I want to use the split quota, it seems there is some pre-requisite.
If you go to MEQ1 and press F1's on the "Minimum qty split" column, and you will notice the following message.
Allocation by quota using splitting quotas is only carried out via a requirement planning run, subject to the following preconditions:
Through the appropriate entry in the field Quota arrangement usage (on the MRP data screen 2 or Purchasing screen) it must have been specified that a quota arrangement is to be applied in the planning run.
The indicator for the splitting quota must be set for the the lot-sizing procedure used for materials planning purposes in Customizing.
Hence, the quota arrangmeent still workable even if the lot-size does not have the spliting quota box checked?
Indicator: Splitting quota in short-term horizon
The indicator for splitting is used to determine that in the case of the selected lot size, the quota arrangement is to be applied using the splitting logic.
Use
If this indicator has been set, the lot is split up in the planning run according to the following formula:
quota for source X
Quantity for source X = --------------------- * requirement
sum of all quotas

Alternative BOM problem in MRP run

Hello Experts,
We have two BOM for one material.Now I want to use BOM-1 for MRP run & BOM-2 for subcontracting.I have maintined following settings.
1) Production version.
2) BOM explosion selection method in MRP4 -2
3) Assign PV in inforecord for subcontracting.
4) Assign PV in MD61 in schedule line .
But when I run MRP it still consider subcontracting BOM.Have I missed any setting?
Kindly guide.Thanks you.

Hi, Follow the below process,
1.Enter the BOM selection method as 2 in the MRP4 view of the material master.
2.In case if you have not assigned the production version in MD61 against the PIR's under schedule line
tab key (in the top menu click on settings and prod version ,then you can assign the prod version which
you need to pick during the MRP run),the system always picksup the first production version during
MRP run even if all the prod versions contains the same validity dates and lot sizes.
3.If you are not willing to assign the prod version in MD61 ,but the system should consider the second
prod version for MRP run means,then set the locked status for the first prod.version.
4.When run MRP via MD02 or MD50 in the simulation mode.(i.e w/o giving tick in simulation mode).
Click on Save,You will get a pop screen,
Now click on the continue icon, Then go to Plaining Results: Individual lines screen.where you will get Plan order on which when double click you will get pop screen below,where you have Planned order no,quantity,plant,storage location,and version.
Now here you can select the required version,and it will become firmed. This BOM will be used in the order now. Try it.

How system calculate the required qty. after MRP RUN

Hi,
I want to know if we are using MRP Type as PD and also we are calculating automatic saftey stock and re order point qty. after MRP RUN according to which rule formula system calculate the safty stock, reorder point qty. and the required qty. as a PR.
and if we are not using calculate safety stock automatically and if we set safety stock qty. manually in this case how system will calculate the required qty.
regards,
zafar

please check the below links.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/6f/b441a9a1b011d3a82d0000e82a3c24/content.htm\
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d256344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ff/515c4749d811d182b80000e829fbfe/content.htm
please check the above links may get some idea.
Regards,

Fields in MIGO - BATCH and Valuation Type

Hi all,
I would like to know the meaning of the following fields in MIGO.
BATCH - Charg
Valuation Type - Bwtar
Which is the impact of each field?
Should they have the same value in TRA MIGO?
Which means that only the BATCH field is entered and the Valuation Type empty?
Thanks you very much!!

valuation type comes into the game If a material is subject to split valuation.
you can for example split the valuation based on origin, e.g. internal produced and external procured.
this is more a financial thing.
the batch is the level to segragate the stock of a material. e.g. each GR can be a new batch. so you can manage the stock by FIFO rules and by shelf life. this is a logistics thing.
Both can be used on their own, or together.
if you want manage your materials by batches, but dont need split valuation, then you only have to take care about batch number, and the valuation type field in the batch record stays empty.
if you manage material by batch and you use split valuation, then the split valuation type is a mandatory field in the batch record and you may have to enter batch and valuation type, but usually the valution type is defaulted from customizing.
The tricky part is if you only use split valuation, because then the valuation type becomes the batch number. this is sometimes a bit confusing.

Split Valuation by Origin

Hi MM Gurus,
I am new to Split valuation, i have configured Spit Valuation for Import and created two valuation types as Italy and france. i have activated for my plant. I have created a material and assigned two valuation types for the same material, with same valuation class and different Moving average price.
Here i want to know in which way it will effect my Process? What i need to check and how i have to proceed further. please guide me. what is the steps i need to do after creating a material.
Thanks in advance,

Hi,
Once you have maintained the split valuation type for the materials, you can maintain the stocks, manage the inventory and transactions as per the valuation types craeted.
1] You can also add valuation type in PO, PR to differentiate these two types of materails
2] As GR will be done against such PO, stocks will be automatcally updated as per valuation types entered.
3] While Issuing or despatching the same material, you can provide selected valuation type.
There will be seperate entries for these two valuation types for the same material since MAP, Valautaion class are different for these two valuation types.

Inforecord for Split valuated materials

Hi all,
How can i maintain different prices for split valuated materials
For Eg. I have a material split valuated based on its Quality vendor supplies two diff quality materials with different prices
how to maintain the prices in inforecords or any alternative to maintain both the prices.
With regards,
Krishna

hi..
Split valuation is for Valuation Purpose only...
SAP does not support....Procuring same material with Diff. Split Valuation Type from Single Vendor is not allowed by SAP standard..
You cannot Maintain Purchase Info for Material which is having 2 Split Valuation type......with One Vendor......
Because For One vendor and One material combination, you can maintain One split valuation type only....
Hope it works..
Thanks..

Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for