Sales Group - sales allocation

hi ,this is regarding the sales allocation among a members of the sales team.i have configured sales teams as Sales Group in SAP.
Now the what ever the sales ,,this sales group does goes as the teams achievement.
Now the requirement is ,is there any way that we can allocate the the total sales among the teams members(can be 3 or 5 or 6 individualscould be 10 also ) % wise in SAP.
like for example , if the sale is of rs100 which slaes group (of 4 members) has achived then can we assign
this 100rs as 10% to A,20% to B,50% c,20% to d .
I have activated sales infotype with help of MY HR consultant ,but we can only assign as employee resposible (any numbers)as partner functions in the Customer master, but how do we allocate the sales in % wise among th teams mebers.
any one please advice ,if this canbe addressed in SAP.
shashi

thanks sanjay for your reply.This sales allocation they want to calculate for sake of incentive calculations.
For example in a sales team or sales pool (the sales target will be a teams target,that is target divided by number of people).So should be the achievment as well(that is waht ever the total sales are ,should be divided by number of people equally).
But the scenario here is different ,though the team has one target ,the achivement has to divided according to the allocation of the Say area manager or sales manager.
This allocation percentages ar decided bythe management.
So if we assign the employee responsible at the partner functions during the sale sorder processing the credit goes to that peticular employee,but since it is pool or teams target ,then the sales has to go to every one in team.
so if we assign all the team members as employee responsible for that perticular sale ,then if the sale is of say 100INR then all the team members will get sales credit of 100inr each ,so the sales figure will be 500inr but not 100inr.
Hope You have understood the scenario.
shashi

Similar Messages

Sales allocation

Hi,
my scenario
have 10 profit centers(stores) on one side
have net sales profit center (comprisng of 3 g/l accts sales flowing in using the same profit center)
i have two calculations to perform
1. calculate the percentage of ind.store sale /total store sale(10 stores) =%
2. then compare that % to a net sales group of account i.e
% acquired * net sales.
can both these calculations be done in a single distribution cycle using 2 segments i.e one calculations output given to a another segments. dont want any manual calculations.
Also i dont want any trace so possibly i would be using assessments which is not so different from using a distribution except for the assessment cost element but still only one calc. is possible in a single segment.
or should i use a SKF or activity type for this.
points would be awarded to a clear solution.

thanks sanjay for your reply.This sales allocation they want to calculate for sake of incentive calculations.
For example in a sales team or sales pool (the sales target will be a teams target,that is target divided by number of people).So should be the achievment as well(that is waht ever the total sales are ,should be divided by number of people equally).
But the scenario here is different ,though the team has one target ,the achivement has to divided according to the allocation of the Say area manager or sales manager.
This allocation percentages ar decided bythe management.
So if we assign the employee responsible at the partner functions during the sale sorder processing the credit goes to that peticular employee,but since it is pool or teams target ,then the sales has to go to every one in team.
so if we assign all the team members as employee responsible for that perticular sale ,then if the sale is of say 100INR then all the team members will get sales credit of 100inr each ,so the sales figure will be 500inr but not 100inr.
Hope You have understood the scenario.
shashi

Extractor for Product Group/Member Allocation- hierarchy (table u2013 PGMI ).

Hello experts
I am looking for standard extractor for Product Group/Member
Allocation- hierarchy (table u2013 PGMI on the ECC).
Is there a standard extractor for product group-hierarchy?
Best Regards,
Tal Shalom.

Hi Lory,
I thought the document contained an explanation of remote key mapping. Obviously it doesn't, sorry.
Setting up remote key mapping is a bit complicated.
First of all go to the MDM console and check your product category field in the main table (catalog items). Is key mapping set to "yes"?
then go to the data manager and switch to the table containing the product categories in record mode. Right click on any entry and check the remote key data. Are remote keys available for your product categories. I assume that there are no remote keys available - this is the reason the system behaves as you describe it.
Setting up remote keys for existing product categories AFAIK can only be done manually in Data Manager. Alternatively you can delete your hierarchy and create it once more, creating remote keys for every entry in the table. You can chose any remote system, it just has to be the same all the time.
In import manager you have to clode the code field of your product category (basically the material group number) and assign it once to the product category in MDM and once to the remote key.
Be sure to check your configuration in MDM Import Manager, the entry "Do not update record matching field value" needs to be set to no. Otherwise no remote keys are created.
Now you can import your categories creating your hierarchy, as usual. The remote keys are created automatically.
You should assign remote keys to all fields that should be matched in a similar way, UOM, currency etc.
Hope you could follow this brief version.
Best regards,
Marcus

BADI or exit for WA08 to group it by allocation table and vendor

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement wherein I need to group the rows upon generation of purchase orders in tcode
WA08. I need to group them so that I can create a PDF format of the PO grouped by allocation table and vendor.
For example, If I created 4 purchase orders with allocation table 123 and vendor 456 then it should only produce
1 PDF file. Are there any BADI or exit that can group my selected rows as per my requirement?
Thank you guys and take care!

Hi ,
I also have this problem and want to know any exit or BAdI for controlling PO item in WA08.
Best regards,
Connie

Displaying data on a different level then the allocation check

Hi
we are creating sales orders in R/3 and executing a sales order check based on a planning area in APO.
this check is done on Product / sold to, because that is the level where teh forecast is entered.
However, one sold to can contain different ship to's. so because of disagregation, it is randomly done over the ship to's.
What we want to obtain is that the when the allocation check is done and the orders is in APO via the CIF, the data is displayed on product sold to, ship to like in the sales order while the check to see if there is enough quantity can remain on product sold to.
Do you have any ideas?
Tommy

Tommy,
Please elaborate on your problem.
I assume you are talking about the Planning book used for Allocations; please confirm. If the only CVCs in your Allocation planning book and your Product Allocation Group are 'Product' and 'Sold To', then 'ShipTo' (and ShipTo disaggregation) is irrelevant. Product Allocation only considers the CVCs that have been created. In this case, multiple ShipTos against a single SoldTo are 'first come first served' until the SoldTo Incoming Orders qty reaches the SoldTo Allocation Qty.
It is possible to include ShipTo in your Allocation Group and Allocation Planning Area in addition to SoldTo; this is a fairly common solution. If you do so, you will THEN have to consider ShipTo Disaggregation issues. Since this seems to be a negative issue for you, I would recommend against it.
Best Regards,
DB49

DTW. ItemGroups. Link between fields in template and in groups.

Hi
I tried to import through DTW ItemGroups to a base. But encounered a problem with linking fields in Group to fields in DTW-template. I've found the appropriate accounts for most of fields(I suppose), but I can't link five of them. What will be the fields in DTW-template where I should put the values of accounts of group? They are empty in scheme (with interrogative sigh).
Here are my scheme of linking:
Group     DTW
Allocation Account     - ???
Cost of Goods Sold Account     CostAccount
Exchange Rate Differences Account     ExchangeRateDifferencesAccount
Expense Account     ExpensesAccount
Expense Account - Foreign     ExpensesAccount
G/L Decrease Account     DecreaseGLAccount
G/L Increase Account     IncreaseGLAccount
Price Difference Account     PriceDifferencesAccount
Purchase Credit Account     PurchaseCreditAcc
Revenue Account     RevenuesAccount
Revenue Account - EU     RevenuesAccount
Revenue Account - Foreign     RevenuesAccount
Sales Credit Account     RevenuesAccount
Sales Returns Account     InventoryAccount
Shipped Goods Account     ShippedGoodsAccount
Stock Account     InventoryAccount
Stock Offset - Decrease Account - ???
Stock Offset - Increase Account     - ???
Variance Account     VarianceAccount
VAT in Revenue Account     VATInRevenueAccount
WIP Stock Account     - ???
WIP Stock Variance Account     - ???
With regards
Maxim

Hi, Gordon.
I can't found any of them in list of fields in template. WIP... doesn't fill values in SBO-base.
Here are the list of fields in template, pick up from it, please, the names of fields
Number
Alert
CostAccount
CostInflationAccount
CostInflationOffsetAccount
CycleCode
DecreaseGLAccount
DecreasingAccount
EUExpensesAccount
EUPurchaseCreditAcc
EURevenuesAccount
ExchangeRateDifferencesAccount
ExemptRevenuesAccount
ExemptedCredits
ExpenseClearingAct
ExpenseOffsetAccount
ExpensesAccount
ForeignExpensesAccount
ForeignPurchaseCreditAcc
ForeignRevenuesAccount
GoodsClearingAccount
GroupName
IncreaseGLAccount
IncreasingAccount
InventoryAccount
InventorySystem
LeadTime
MinimumOrderQuantity
OrderInterval
OrderMultiple
PAReturnAccount
PlanningSystem
PriceDifferencesAccount
ProcurementMethod
PurchaseAccount
PurchaseCreditAcc
PurchaseOffsetAccount
ReturningAccount
RevenuesAccount
SalesCreditAcc
SalesCreditEUAcc
SalesCreditForeignAcc
ShippedGoodsAccount
StockInflationAdjustAccount
StockInflationOffsetAccount
TransfersAccount
VATInRevenueAccount
VarianceAccount
WIPMaterialAccount
WIPMaterialVarianceAccount

Allocations

entity(dim)
entity1(parent) -> entity11(child1), entity12(child2)
entity2(parent) -> entity21(child1), entity22(child2)
product(dim)
productgroup1(parent) -> product11(child1), product12(child2)
productgroup2(parent) -> product21(child1), product22(child2)
GeographyLocation(dim)
GeoLocation1(parent) -> GeoLocation11(child1), GeoLocation12(child2)
GeoLocation2(parent) -> GeoLocation21(child1), GeoLocation22(child2)
Vendor(dim)
Vendor1(parent) -> Vendor11(child1), Vendor12(child2)
Vendor2(parent) -> Vendor21(child1), Vendor22(child2)
its not an exact hierarchy, I am putting this to make you understand better.
we want to do sales allocation for each entity by product by location by vendor
the first level of allocation is by product percentage. for example, an entity(entity 11) has a total sales amount of 1000, it should be allocated to product 1,2,3 by 40%,35%,25% and the share of products is 400,350,250 respectively.
after this the allocation will be by location. for example the product 1 will be sold in 4 different locations. and the percentage of allocation for location 1,2,3,4 is 25% each. so, for product 1, the location share is 100,100,100,100 respectively.
Now the allocation is by vendor, and for example there are 3 vendors. so, for product1,location1 the allocation for vendor 1,2,3 is 33%,33%,33% then the share for each vendor is 33.3,33.3,33.33 respectively.
Can you please explain me how to do this allocation using data forms. also please help me with the business rules logic. Please let me know if you need more details. Sorry, I am asking for a lot...but I appreciate your time.
Thanks in advance.
Rahul M

Any takers on this please?
Thanks in advance.
Rahul M

Report PS to check by WBS group

Hi All,
Can we use WBS group rather than project definition in SAP PS report ? I am trying to find the standard report to use WBS group...but cannot find.....
please help.
cheers,
Nies

I've used WBS groups for allocations/periodic reposting and planning purposes but never for reporting.
For reporting can create variants which already have the selection parameters filled in. Use multiple selection on WBS field to include/exclude WBS's.
Regards
Sreenivas

Allocation of expenses

Hello All,
I had one interesting scenario from my client on allocation of expenses. This was possible using standard BCS functionality but was not straightforward. So would like to listen from you all on your solution before we discuss mine. The solution I proposed has one drawback but fulfills the requirements.
Requirement is to allocate certain expenses(X,Y and Z) to one particular item (A) for multiple "products".(Product is a sub assignment) . X,Y and Z expenses have no values for sub assignment "Product.
Rules of the game are:
1. Value in items X,Y and Z should remain as it is i.e.,no negation / reversal of these values
2.Allocation should happen based on Turnover Transaction data in combination with "Product"
2A. If source values (X,Y and Z) are in Posting Level (PL) 00,01, it should happen based on Company Turnover
2B. If source values (X,Y and Z) are in PL00,01, and there is no Company Turnover available in transaction data, it should happen based on Group Turnover
2C. If source values (X,Y and Z) are in PL10, allocation should happen based on Group Turnover.
Let me know if the scenario is not clear and needs more explanation. Looking forward for your response.
Thanks
Sreekanth
Edited by: Sreekanth on Jun 20, 2011 8:56 AM

I am much more familiar with reclassifications than allocations, but am certain the results from either can usually be obtained.
A method layout with trigger of items X,Y and Z, then different source and target is necessary. Then the specifics may be defined as needed.
It is most likely 2 allocations or reclassifications are needed because for group level allocations or reclassifications it is necessary to use posting level 30 document.

Allocation of multiple expenses in various 100% proportions

Hi
With reference to Message 843069, we would like to suggest improvement to enable multiple allocation of expenses to respective departmental segments using a single Posting Template when each expense is allocated in various proportions of 100% among its Departments.
Example
Allocation of Stationery expense (1000 00) to its Department (1000 01) 1
and (1000 02) 2 at 50% each and allocation of Postage expense (2000 00)
to its Department (2000 01) 1 at 60% and (2000 02) 2 at 40%.
We need these allocations to be saved in a single Posting Template to
create a single Journal Entry at one goal.

I am much more familiar with reclassifications than allocations, but am certain the results from either can usually be obtained.
A method layout with trigger of items X,Y and Z, then different source and target is necessary. Then the specifics may be defined as needed.
It is most likely 2 allocations or reclassifications are needed because for group level allocations or reclassifications it is necessary to use posting level 30 document.

G/L allocation error

Hi Experts,
I am having a problem with an Item Group G/L allocation, we have assigned an item to a new Item group( was previously linked to a different group). The new group is allocated to a different account. However when we post invoices linked to this Item it still posts to the old account, is there any other changes I can make to guarantee that the invoices post to the correct account?
Your suggestions are much appreciated.
Regards,
Lebo

Hi Lebogang,
This can happen when an Invoice is based on a document that was created before the change of Item Group.
The invoice will copy the account that has been defined on the basedocument row.
Use form settings to display the GL account field on the row of the Invoice and the base document.
The same will happen if you manually change the GL account on the row, this will be copied to the target document and what is defined for the item in the group will not overwrite this.
If this is not the case let us know.
Jesper

What is meant by article grouping and site grouping and how to define

what is meant by article grouping and site grouping and how to define in SAP.

Hi Charan,
Article Grouping in its broader sense means grouping of Articles for ease of maintenance and business functions, either on the basis of Hierarchy or on the basis of Merchandise Category.Article Grouping is also primarily useful in promotions,wherein you can define a set of articles(which may not necessary fall under the same MC or Hierarchy) and club them together and assign them in a promotion.Txn codes used are : VBG1/2/3 - Create/Change/Display Article Group
For more information refer the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/12/08485c470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
Site Grouping is used for ease of maintenance by grouping the sites.It is also used to maintain the characteristics as well.This can also be used in Allocation Tables,promotion and Listing etc
Some of the Txn codes -
WB50 - Site Group,Create Alloc,.table
Wb56 - Site Group, Alloc.table,Maintain Sites in Class
WB60 - Site Group,Create Promotions
WB64 - Site Group,Maintain SItes to Class
Wb80 - Create Site Group Other
For more information,refer the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/12/08485c470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
Hope it helps
Rgds,
Aram K.
For more information refer to the link below

Component allocation in planned order and production order

Hi all,
I want table or Function module for component allocation in production order and planned order.If component changes done in
planned order or production order.
In Table PLMZ and STPO I am getting component which are allocated in routing MASTER DATA.But if after generation of
production order or planned order and I had changed one component in production order then it will not show in PLMZ and STPO
table.
Please reply.
Regards,
Vidyasagar

Dear
Please check the following table :
AFKO         Order Header
AFPO          Order Item Detail -Compoenets
AFVC          Order Operations Detail
AUFG         Allocation Table Sub-Item, Store Group
AUFI           Allocation Table, Document Sub-item, Store
AUFK          Order master data
RESB
FM: CO_BC_INSERT_CMP_OF_ORDERS . BAPI : BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETDETAIL.
Refer : Change components and Routing of production order
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Dec 13, 2010 7:54 PM

What is t-code SHD0's 'Variant Groups' used for?

hi all:
What is t-code SHD0's 'Variant Groups' used for?
It seems can't work,who can help me?
thanksss.

Variant groups
An extension of the standard variants is involved in the variant groups; the standard groups are often insufficient:
Different users (groups) should work with different variants;
Some users should be able to execute a transaction with different variants.
This is possible - in addition to the advantages that the standard variants offer - with variant groups:
Variants from variant groups are automatically applied, but only for users that are assigned to them.
A user can be assigned to several groups and can change the assignment.
The values of the groups are not applied in the batch input mode.
If a transaction is started with another transaction variant, the values are not additionally applied to a variant group.
How are the variant groups maintained?
You can enter the group names on the "Variant Group" tab and maintain variant groups with the "Create" or "Change" functions.
The group name must be in the "correct" namespace.
In addition, there are two Where-Used Lists:
Which users are assigned to the group,
For which transactions the group applies.
Which transaction variants belong to the groups?
The name of a transaction variant that is to belong to a group meets the following naming conventions:
<Name of variant group><name of transaction code>. Example: A transaction variant is to be created for the XYZ transaction that belongs to GROUP1. The name of the transaction variant is then GROUP1XYZ.
Due to this naming convention, the group name must be in the "correct" namespace.
Transaction variants that (randomly) meet this naming convention do not necessarily belong to a group. The group assignment is activated by
1. Creating a group
2. Assigning users to this group
A transaction variant that belongs to a group can also be used this way, like a transaction variant without a group.
How are the transaction variants that belong to a group maintained?
Transaction variants that belong to a group are maintained in the same way as all other transaction variants, they are distinguished using a naming convention (<name of variant group> <name of transaction codes>).
They can be maintained in the "transaction variants" tab or in the "variant groups" tab. If you maintain them in the "variant groups" tab, you must always enter the transaction code so that the name of the transaction variant can be determined.
Under what conditions is a variant from a group applied?
A variant from a group is applied if users are assigned.
(Only for the assigned users, all other users get the original transaction with a variant from a different group.)
It is NOT sufficient to
Create a group
Create a variant that satisfies the naming convention.
How do you assign users to groups?
You can assign users in the "variant groups" tab in the "user assignment".
Enter the user name.
The user is assigned to the group with the "assign" function, but they see original transaction(s) or the transactions with variants from another group as the proposal.
The assignment of users to the group is deleted using the "delete assignment" function.
The user is assigned to the group using the "Set Proposal" function and the relevant transactions are started for this user with the corresponding variants.
The proposal is canceled with the "Cancel Proposal" function, the assignment itself remains.
If you enter the user names generically (*), you receive a selection screen in which you can
Choose whether assignments or proposals are to be changed
Further restrict user names (the group in the "all users from group" option has nothing to do with the variant group, it concerns the "user group for authorization check" from the user master record (logon data)).
By choosing "Execute", you receive a list in which you can further restrict the user selection. The "Save" function saves the assignments for all selected users.
If you want to start the report in the background, you can choose if just the list should be outputted, or if the database changes should also be performed.
If a user is additionally also to be able to execute the original transaction, he must be assigned to the "empty group", the allocation takes place in the same way, in this case, nothing is simply entered in the group name field.
Regards,
Joy.

Urgent info needed

what is updating group,info structure,and update check why we use it

Hi,
Update group for statistics update:--
The update group is a control element in the updating definition, which allows all the different business events in the various applications to have a uniform influence on the statistics update in the Logistics Information System (LIS).
In an application, one update group is allocated to a specific business event or a group of business events. This update group is then used to determine the fields which will be created for the statistics.
The type of allocation and the organizational elements that determine how the allocation takes place vary from application to application.
Information Structures:-
In an information system, data aggregation is necessary in order to ensure that the user has a clear overview of key interrelationships. Since the requirements which need to be satisfied by data aggregation are determined by many different user groups, it is absolutely vital that aggregation functionality is flexible. Experience shows that various user groups need to view aggregated data from many different perspectives.
The SAP system makes these different views possible by providing self-defined information structures.
In the information structures, you can define your own view, by selecting the information from the operative application that you consider worthy of aggregation.
A distinction is made between three types of information:
Characteristics
You can define a maximum of nine characteristics for each information structure. These characteristics form the table keys of the database table.
Key figures
The key figures refer to values with significance to business, which are aggregated by means of the characteristics (e.g. invoiced sales, quantity of incoming orders, order quantity, lead time).
Period split
The periodic cumulation of data is a further criterion for aggregation. The key figures are thus aggregated on a daily, weekly or monthly basis, or on the basis of a variable period split that is determined by the fiscal year variant.
Update Check:--
You can use the update log to monitor the updating of statistical data. The information displayed in the update log is user-dependent and operation-dependent.
The update log is a tool that you can use to check updating once it has taken place, and to check the generation of the information structures and the update rules assigned to them.
You can also use the update simulation function to monitor the update procedure. In addition, you can use update simulation to generate an update log for documents that have not caused an update.
Reward points if u helpful
Cheers,
Govind.

Sales Group - sales allocation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for