Sales order actuals vs forecast

Hi,
I would like to have a report showing the difference between the sales order actuals and forecasted amount for a particular inventory item.I guess for the actuals, data can be taken from the oe_order_headers_all and oe_order_lines_all .
The tables mrp_forecast_updates,mrp_sales_order_updates seem to contain data which gets changed as the sales orders are created.From which table can i get the total forecasted quantity for a particular inventory item over a given period of time?
Thanks & regds,
Nithya

Hi,
Can you please clarify whether you are looking at consumption within APO or on R/3 side.
B/R,
Prem

Similar Messages

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

RA Category for Sales Order Actual Settlement

Hi,
During production order settlement for WIP we run in every month end. Generally in tcode OKG8 (Posting Rule in WIP calculation and Result Analysis) we use RA category WIPR(Work In Process with Requirement to Capitalize) which is used production order settlement for WIP. We have done production order settlement and successfully value posted to WIP settlement gl account because in OKG8 WIPR is maintained against P&L and B&S account. After that we have done Result Analysis for Sales Order through KKA3. Value has posted to various objects under Result /analysis. Now we need to run Actual Settlement for Sales Order. In case of Sales Order Costing what should be its RA catergory for Actual Settlment : Sales Order settlment which is run through VA88.
Best Regards,
Samrat Roy

Dear Waman,
In OKG8 posting rule WIP calculation against RA category is maintained as WIPR with P&L and BS gl account. Uner Result Analysis valuation method against RA Key for Sales Order is maintained as PREL, REL, DLV, FNBL and TECO. Production order settlement has done and value has posted to WIP gl account and Quantiy has issued for delivery and billing. After the Sale billing I have done KKA3 which is Result Analysis for Sales Order. Value has posted to Sales order wip, Actual Revenue, Actual Cost, Cost of Sale, Revenu affecting net income, Planned revenue, planned cost, Planned profit and loss value shows. After that I have run VA88 and sales order wip value has posted to wip gl accounts which is set in OKG8 both P&L and BS gl account which same gl is used for production order settlment also and I created Sales Order settlement rule which is receiver in GL accounts. That GL is external settlement GL account. That external settlment receiver gl is same as sales order settlment profile's allocation structure GL. So during final sales order settlment same gl is debited and credited of calculated profit.
But I have some doubts which I requires as per business. I need Revenue Surplus(POCS), Reserve Unrealized Cost(RUCR), Revenue in Excess Billing(POCI) and variance from Result Analysis(VARR). I wanted to set this RA category in OKG8 but system does not allow me which says alrady WIPR is maintaied and value posted to result analysis. So I need to deactivate first then new RA key can be introduced..
Also I would ask you after production order settlement for wip, shall I run wip for Sales order and Sales Order settlement. or I need to to pas customer delivery and final billing. After billing I need to run WIP on sales order and sales order settlement. Basically I will run two times WIP which are production order and sales order. Our business sceanrio consists of one sales order with 29 prouction and its corresponding 29 wip which will be finally settled to Sales order external settlment gl account.
Best Regards,
Samrat roy

Planning for Sales orders for quantities greater than forecast in APO SNP

Hi All,
We have a requirement in which planning in SNP is done based on the forecast quantity transferred from DP . Demand from Sales orders is not taken into consideration for planning . The PO's are created based on the forecast quantity only SO's consume forecast . Now a situation arises where we have the sales orders quantity ( say 400) is more than that of the forecast( say 300 ) , this means for quantity of 100 no planning is being done by SNP.
We want to know are there any ways of getting the remaining quantity being planned by SNP
The planning strategy used is 40 in ECC
Thanks in advance
Regards
Surendra

Hi Surendra,
For better control, the forecast quantity should match the sales order quantity for plg strategy 40. If there are cases when sales order quantity is greater than forecast, you can create a control check in ECC to inform the users who creates the sales orders to get a popup message to create a sales order with rush order type or any other type to track the excess sales orders received against forecast.
In SNP, once this rush order is entered, upon subsequent net change heuristic plan which runs day night, it considers those excess quantities and puts up purchase requisitions and procurement & production can be planned based using those PRs in SNP.
Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Forecast Overvew - Detail. Sales order date

Dear experts,
I have come accross the following issue in APO hoping that someone will have already encountered it before and can assist.
In product view I see some sales orders with a specific start date that are consistently moved 1 day in the tab Forecast (Detail) as shown below.
See in the elements tab in /SAPAPO/RRP3, order 5402670 has a start date on 13.04.2015
while in the forecast - detail tab, the date is 12.04.2015
Does anybody know how to get the dates matching between the elements tab and the forecast tab?
Thanks in advance
Salvador

Dear Marius,
my consumption mode is "2", so backward/forwards. See screenshot.
I don´t immediately see why this should change the dates of the sales orders in the forecast tab.
any other idea?
thanks so much for your time!
Salvador

Unconfirmed Sales Orders should not consume Forecast

Hi All,
We have an issue where the Unconfirmed Sales Order consumes the Forecast in APO. As per the requirement we only want to have Consumption of Forecast against the Confirmed Sales Order. Please suggest how we can stop this.
The Planning Strategy in Product Master is maintained as 20 (PLANNING WITH FINAL ASSEMBLY), corresponding in R/3 is 40.
fyi, we use APO 3.1.
Thanks,
Aashish

Hi Aashish,
You might set the "fixed date and quantity flag" for the unconfirmed items so they will not generate a requirement and thus they will not be transfered to APO. But the order will also never appear in a APO BOP run...
Another option would be to switch off the consumption in the APO inbound processing (userexit) when a sales order without confirmation arrives.
best regards,
Michael

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

History - Incoming Sales Orders!

hello,
i load data from 2LIS_11_VAITM into BI. Now, i should historicize the changes of "Incoming Sales Orders" per month/year in my DSO "Incoming Sales Orders". I use BI 7.0
The rules in my start-Routine of Transformation
1. If a new Position(recordmode = empty) is insert,then map 1:1
   Incoming Sales Order = netvalue of position.
2. Change of a existing position
   in this case i get a Before-Image(recordmode = 'X') and a After-Image(recordmode =empty).
   Incoming Sales Order = Incoming Sales Order(actual month) + delta(value After-Image/value Before_Image)
3. Delete position
Incoming Sales Order = - Sum ( all booked values of the current position)
Example:
01.02.2008 a new position with value 1.000,00 was inserted.
PSA:
recordmode |Bel_|pos|date______|value
_____''____|1000|10_|01.02.2008|1.000,-
DSO:
|Bel_|pos|0CALMONTH|netvalue
|1000|10_|02.2008__| 1.000,-
At 05.03.2008 the value raise to 1.200,-
PSA:
recordmode |Bel_|pos|date______|value
____'X'____|1000|10_|01.02.2008|1.000,-
____''_____|1000|10_|05.03.2008|1.200,-
DSO:
|Bel_|pos|0CALMONTH|netvalue
|1000|10_|02.2008__| 1.000,-
|1000|10_|03.2008__| 200,-
In the same month(20.03.2008) the value raise again.
PSA:
recordmode |Bel_|pos|date______|value
____'X'____|1000|10_|05.03.2008|1.200,-
____''_____|1000|10_|20.03.2008|1.500,-
DSO:
|Bel_|pos|0CALMONTH|value
|1000|10_|02.2008__|1.000,-
|1000|10_|03.2008__|500,-
At 10.04.2008 the position was deleted.
PSA:
recordmode |Bel_|pos|date______|value
____'R'____|1000|10_|10.04.2008|-1.500,-
DSO
|Bel_|pos|0CALMONTH|value
|1000|10_|02.2008__|1.000,-
|1000|10_|03.2008__|500,-
|1000|10_|04.2008__|-1.500,-
Could anyone help me to realize it.. I'm a absolut beginner in ABAP.
regards sunny

As already described above the KE4F does not solve the problem.
The incompleteness check still shows missing segments, even if they have been created via KE4F.
The only thing that resolves the problem at the moment is the manual change of each position, after KE4F with deleting the segment and creating a new one. But we have many orders with a high number of positions so the manual effort is much too high.

Collected ATO Model & items with sales orders and forcast not in ASCP plan

PTO/ATO/ATP challenged - need some help understanding this and how it should work or if it can work.
On 11.5.10.2, a customer wants to see the ATO model and options in the ASCP plan
when the ATO configuration item is not created in the Sales Order.
Using the BOMN example below level 2 - ATO item and level 4 - Marketing Code (Forecast at this level)
ALTIX-4700-PTO-Z level 1 PTO Model
ALTIX-4700-ATO-Z level 2 ATO model
--ALTIX4700-SYS-Z level 3
LST-IRU-Z level 4 Ordered item
LST-4700-WC-Z level 4 Ordered item
LST-IRU-WC-SRACK-Z level 4 Ordered item
They are not seeing level 4 items in the plan even though they have Sales Order Demand and forecast at this level.
They see the items in the collection workbench, but they are missing in the ASCP plan.
Any ideas will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Edited by: Bob Marchant on Oct 16, 2008 12:02 PM

Are you able to book an order on sales order work bench with same configuartion?

Fixed exchange rate on PO taken from sales order?

Dear, we want to fix the exchange rate on the PO (standard SAP), but we want the exchange rate of the PO to be the one from the sales order (actually the one originally coming from the quote). Anu ideas on how to do this (standard or which user-exit)? txs, Koen

It is a user exit as you are replacing the Exchange rate.. you might want to think again.. however you could use MM06E004, if not MM06E005 to accomplish this.

Independant demand consumption for sales orders

Hi there,
I wish to know if the consumption of the product from MD61, is based on MM MRP3 view settings only???
We use,
Consumption mode: 4 (Backward/Forward)
Backward Consp :999
Forward Consp :999
Once goods issue done on today's date, I can see the part to be consumed first from the current week's demand & then it goes either forward or backward based on the MRP3 setting.
But meaningfully, it must consume from the oldest date (meaning back-date) of when the demand was created right???
I can give ex. Assume we are currently in wk 19. If the demand is created like,
wk 17 - 2
wk 18 - 1
wk 19 - 2
wk 20 - 1
When I set the Consumption mode to -02 (backward/forward) & if I create a sales order for 4 pcs.
After I do GI, I see the demand as below,
wk 17 - 1
wk 18 - 0
wk 19 - 0
wk 20 - 1
Becos I have set backward first & then forward, it consumes first from the current week's demand of 2 pcs & for the next 2 pcs, it goes to wk 18 & wk 17.
But supposedly it should take from this order wk 17, wk 18 & then wk 19.
Pls do share if there are any settings need to be done on Delivery side, as this is affecting only when I do PGI.
Thanks,
Pri

Hi Surendra,
For better control, the forecast quantity should match the sales order quantity for plg strategy 40. If there are cases when sales order quantity is greater than forecast, you can create a control check in ECC to inform the users who creates the sales orders to get a popup message to create a sales order with rush order type or any other type to track the excess sales orders received against forecast.
In SNP, once this rush order is entered, upon subsequent net change heuristic plan which runs day night, it considers those excess quantities and puts up purchase requisitions and procurement & production can be planned based using those PRs in SNP.
Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Activating Pricing for Sales Order in Retail

Hi All/Vijay/KK,
Please tell me how activate the pricing for sales order, actually in SD we do Pricing Determination, what has to be done for Retail pricing

Hi,
To do sales order pricing
Goto IMG>Sales & Distribution>Basic Functions>Pricing>Pricing Control
Either Follow Standard, condition type PR00
or in case of Custom
1. Use condition table 406 Site/article
2. Define Access Sequences ZPR0
Enter accesses:10 406 Site/article Exclusive x
3. Define Condition Types (ZPR0 assign newly defined access sequence)
4. Define And Assign Pricing Procedures (assign condition types ZPR0..etc. to it)
Then maintain condition record , go to VK11 --> Enter your Z condition type (eg. ZPR0)., enter the amounts.
Add the pricing procedure , to sales document type.
For Retail Sales Pricing
For Retail Sales Pricing based on Purchase pricing you can follow the following method:
The retail price is always based on the purchase net/net price. This purchase net price is built up from the purchasing pricing elements or condition types defined to be included in the purchase net price. A planned mark-up is applied to the purchase net/net to calculate the proposed retail price. The planned mark-up can be set by merchandise category and for exceptions, more specifically by article.
You can perform Two-step calculation for retail pricing, for example, for stores that are supplied by a distribution center (internal vendor). Calculating sales prices for the stores is based on the transfer price for distribution centers (preceding organizational unit).
1. Set up Master Data (WB02) - Relevant Fields should be maintained
2. Set up Article Master Data - Logistics DC and Store View (MM42)
Relevant Fields should be maintained
3. Maintain Mark up for DC(VK11) -Markup % at Distribution channel distribution chain level
Mark ups maintained at two levels:
For DC: At distribution chain level
Condition type used: AUFS
For Stores: At article level
New condition type ZUFS created.
4. Maintain Mark up for Stores (VK11) Markup % at Store distribution chain level
5 Create Pricing Procedures (IMG) -Pricing Procedures created
6. Carry out Price calculation for DC(VKP5) - Pricing Document created - DC Transfer price calculated
7. Carry out Price calculation for Stores (VKP5) - Pricing Document created - Final Retail Price Calculated
The final retail price that is calculated is stored in the condition type VKP0.
Hope it helps,
Regards,
Anirban Roy

IMP:Forecast Consumption/Netting by incoming Sales orders in SNP

Dear All,
I need your help to understand the logic of Forecast netting by Sales orders in SNP. I can see the details in /SAPAPO/RRP3 but getting puzzled for soem SKUs. We don't have any PP/DS and GATP implemented.
Below are the details and question based on that:
I am releasing my forecast monthly and Sales orders as usual are coming from ECC and netting happens. Then next month again i have my forecast release then will the existing Sales orders will consume my this month's forecast (we are following backward/ foreward consumption type with 35 days back and 1 day forward, so as per the time period, SO can consume Forecast). I am a bit confused because pegging relationship is created between the demand and supply element and so new forecast shouldn't be consumed by the existing Sales orders. Am i correct here?
Secondly, could somebody explain the difference between the 'Overview and detail' tab under the Forecast tab in /SAPAPO/RRP3. Sometimes i see some data under the 'Withdrawal Qty' column in Detail view of Forecast tab. Could somebody explain when it is populated.
Regards
Bishwajit

Hi,
I think your first question is regarding the pegging relationships used for forecasting. Even when you release a new forecast, the system remembers the forecast relationship. So, pegging occurs but in the sense that it pegs to forecast - in general - not to one specific forecast order in the system. If you desire to "reset" these relationships, then you need to run the program for reorganization of independent requirements (/SAPAPO/MD74).
Your second question relates to the existence of a withdrawal quantity and differences between the overview and details in /SAPAPO/RRP3. The withdrawal quantity represents the amount of forecast that has been "reduced" from the forecast (corresponding to actual shipments that have been PGI'd against deliveries). Forecast consumption occurs when SO's and Deliveries are created and saved and reduction occurs when they are PGI'd. Withdrawal quantity corresponds to the reduction...
Hope this helps!
Chris

Liquidity forecast Downpayment For Sales order

Hi gurus,
When i post down payment for sales order with special indicator "a" system does not decrease sales order amount at liquidity forecast(FF7B). Is it a system bug or are down payments does not considered for sales orders like purchase orders?
Kind Regards
Koray
Edited by: Koray Yanik on Mar 16, 2011 8:17 AM

Hi JH,
I'm using strategy 40. Actually my problem is when a sales order falls outside the consumption period of the forecast then PGI is done. The withdrawal quantity works in Normal scenario but not work if the Sales Order is outside the consumption period.
The withdrawal quantity is not captured when forecast is reloaded in the same week as the Sales Order.
Thanks,
Raymond

Sale Order Scenario - Report in PS Budget /Actual/Variance

Dear Experts,
Please help me understand solve the scenario given below
Step 1
Work order issued to a contractor ( contract includes Service and Material from the contractor) - Service being the labour part
and Material being the cement
But cement is supplied by the client as a sale of cement at a basic price agreed between the two parties.
Eg:
There are 2 WBS
WBS 1 - has a PR released converted to PO with value 100 ( inclusive service + material)
Material procured through me51n , Me21n - GR done and stock has come to GNST ( 40 rs)
material converted to sale order stock mb1b - 412 E after creating sale order with reference to WBS 2
WBS 2 - reports cost incurred for procurement ie; 40rs
Actual booked against WBS1 based on GR 100
Once the billing is done for rs 20 ( basic price) report in budget actual variance shows as below
                Budget    Actual    Variance
WBS 1      200          100          100
WBS 2                       40           -40
Report should show 120 as the project cost rather than 140 - since 20 is lost against selling at lower cost.
How to get the cost to 120 which is the actual cost for the work

Dear Experts,
Please help me understand solve the scenario given below
Step 1
Work order issued to a contractor ( contract includes Service and Material from the contractor) - Service being the labour part
and Material being the cement
But cement is supplied by the client as a sale of cement at a basic price agreed between the two parties.
Eg:
There are 2 WBS
WBS 1 - has a PR released converted to PO with value 100 ( inclusive service + material)
Material procured through me51n , Me21n - GR done and stock has come to GNST ( 40 rs)
material converted to sale order stock mb1b - 412 E after creating sale order with reference to WBS 2
WBS 2 - reports cost incurred for procurement ie; 40rs
Actual booked against WBS1 based on GR 100
Once the billing is done for rs 20 ( basic price) report in budget actual variance shows as below
                Budget    Actual    Variance
WBS 1      200          100          100
WBS 2                       40           -40
Report should show 120 as the project cost rather than 140 - since 20 is lost against selling at lower cost.
How to get the cost to 120 which is the actual cost for the work

Sales order actuals vs forecast

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for