Same logical systems for two environments productive

Hi gurus.
I have a question for ALE
There are two production systems a copy of another, who want to connect both to configure the ALE, but by mistake, both systems were the same logical system when they made the copy. Since this change takes months. At the moment I can not make this change in BDLS because it is a productive environment.
When trying to configure the ALE, I am have problems with the logical system name, although one of the settings I gave it another name when you configure the transaction BD64.
Guys, what I find solution to configure the ALE, without changing the logical system to a productive environments ??????
Regards,
Desiré

Hi Mark, thanks for the replay.
I understand also that the solution is to execute the BDLS to change the logical system and convert all tables to new logical system.
I don´t know how the process copy for both system productive.
The problem is that both environments are connected to BW, and other applications and they opened an OSS note to SAP consulting and and the answer given is that they did not recommend changing the logical system.
I thought if there was another way to configure ALE without having the problem of changing the logical system environments.
Regards,
Desiré

Similar Messages

Same Logical System Name, different Business System

Hi all,
I have a problem regarding SLD and Integration Directory. The client is requiring me to use the same logical system name for two different business systems. It seems that this is not possible in XI. When I tried activating the business system in ID, I'm getting the error, 'Logical system XXX already exists in communication component YYY'. Please help. Thanks!
IX

Hi,
You cannot have same logical name for two business systems....
Why you need it?? How will the SAP system understand which which system the message was sent for?? Some workaround like
1. Create a business system with this logical system
2. Overwrite sender/receiver business system in the receiver agreement for messages sent to 2nd business system..
This may lead to discrepancies....
Regards
Suraj

Same logical system name for two productive systems - BW, PI issues

Dear all,
we have a productive system which serves two companies (different company codes). This system is connected both to BW and PI for both companies.
There is a requirement that these two companies must use their own system, so the whole landscape (dev,qa,prd) will be copied to different systems (different server with different system id).
As a result of the above procedure we wll have two different productive systems, as required, but we wll have the same logical system name for the two productive systems, which must be both connect to bw and PI.
However as far as I know:
- we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
- we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
How can we overcome the problem?
Please advice.

> However as far as I know:
> - we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
> - we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
Right.
> How can we overcome the problem?
Since you split up systems (or plan to) I highly recommend booking an SLO service (http://service.sap.com/slo). Those people have to the tools and the knowlege to help you. I would not do this on my own.
Markus

Unable to create two SourceSystem with same Logical System

Dear gurus,
The customer has expressed the need to connect a data source with the same Logical System name of the actual DS.
Infact, on the SCC4 the R3 Prod/qua/dev has the same LOGSYS.
The aim is to link the PROD/R3 system to the QUA/BW system.
During the creation of the DS on RSA1, an error message display that BW cannot create the Source because the Logical system is already in use.
All we know that on BI can not be two identical technical name, but if i CANNOT change the LogicalSystem on the SCC4, there is a workaround?
Can i map the new sourcesystem with another LOGSYS name?
Or the only solution is to change the logical?
Thanks in advance
C.C

Hi Sven and thanks for the reply.
unfortunately the customer chose to appoint the entire landscape with the same logical system name (policy), so that i cannot make this change on SCC4.
So, i have to link only one SourceSystem (or quality or prod)...but at least, i will make a refresh copy of the quality system
ps: i'm a Basis

Two R3 servers have the same logical system name?

Can two R3 servers have the same logical system name present in the same network? We plan to clone our production server and let the clone reside in the same network. The clone is identical with the production server with the same SID, hostname, logical system name, but different IP address.

Hi
Check this [Link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/da/5990df015b5b43a36f6ce7fa1ee8c0/content.htm]will cleare you doubt
Regards
Uday

Define one logical system for PI or multiple LS for 3rd-party system?

Hi gurus,
We are using IDOC2SOAP and SOAP2IDOC scenario in PI7.11. My question is regarding the logical system(or partner profile) on R3 side. We have two 3rd party system:A and B, so we have two choices.
1. define one single logical system for PI integration server;
2. define two logical systems for A and B.
For choice 1, it seems we can only use one business sytem or business component (business service in 7.0) as the two 3rd party system, especially for SOAP2IDOC scenario.
For choice 2, it seems we have no restrictions.
Is it correct?Any help will be appreciated.

technically you can use both options.
The question is - do you want all the IDOCs in your R3 system to appear as though they were sent from the PI?
What if a lot of 3rd party systems were sending the same IDOC (for example - ORDERS) and you want to investigate only those who were sent from system A?
I like it configured that every system will be identified by a name I give it.
I just use the IDOC communication channel checkbox of "Take Sender from Payload"
or use a different service in the IBC that has a different logical system configured in its Adapter specific identifiers.
Hope it helps,
Imanuel Rahamim.

Error:No Logical system for FI is maintained.

Hi,
we are working on SRM 4.0 and i got the below error messages while trying to create the shopping cart from catalog in quality system.
1. No Logical system for FI is maintained.inform system admin.
2. Enter company code.
3. Partner00000123458 not found.
we have checked org structure in production and quality system,but there is no problem with production. problem with quality system only. even both systems are having same structure.
can you please advise where we need to check the settings pertaining to logical system in SRM side.
Regards,
SIS

Hi
1.Kindly make ensure that all SPRO settings with quality logical system ( ECC as well as SRM) .
2. check org attribure value logical sytem too

"No Logical system for FI is maintained" error message

Hi Experts,
When I am trying to create Shopping Cart in SRM portal for a free text material I am receiving the below message
"No Logical system for FI is maintained".
I was able to create Shopping Cart successfully for an imported material from R/3 back-end.
I have verified the previous posts on the same message but I beleive I have already those settings in place.
Request you to help.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Rahul,
Please make sure you have maintained the attributes ACS and BUK in the organization model.
Also please check that you have filled the responsibility and function tabs for the corresponding purchasing organization/purchasing group.
Did you do a client copy among your systems?
In the table BBP_DET_LOGSYS it may still contain the old product category GUID from the other system.
After downloading the customzing object, DNL_CUST_PROD0, in your system, the GUID created in COMM_CATEGORY table could be different from the one used in BBP_DET_LOGSYS.
Redo the "Define Backend System for Product Category" in the IMG and retest the issue. Please also verify the business organization settings.
I hope this information helps.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Same logiical system for 2 Business Service

Hi All,
Can two business services use the same Logical system name.
Regards,
XIer

<i>We have a scenario where we want to send files and also another scenario where we have to send a file.</i>
Not sure I got the point here
Logical System Names make sense only when dealing with SAP systems when trying to post an Idoc. For File System's they have no use at all.
Regards
Bhavesh

How to map same sales unit for two keyfigures

hi,
i am using two key figure with reference of one sales unit(0SALESUNIT) but in update rules i am getting only one key figure the other key figure is not showing in update rules.
i want to use the same sales unit for two different key figure.
How to do it.
Ankit

Hi Ankit,
if you have 2 key figures that are not defined as a reference of another key figure, but just use 0SALES_UNIT as their unit, you should have no problems with the update rules. The system will show both key figures in the update rule (or transformation).
Also then the logic you map for 0SALES_UNIT will apply to both key figures in a transformation. For an update rule the same applies, unless you map the 2 key figures differently on purpose.
I am not sure if your question was saying that you have defined a key figure as a reference to another key figure. If you have that situation, you should still be fine. If not try the approach above, after all there is not much benefit in creating a reference key figure in contract to creating a reference Characteristic (sharing master data, etc.)
Best,
Ralf

Logical system for IDoc acknowledgment?

Hi,
HTTP --> XI --> IDOC (with acknowledgment) is my scenario
whether the inbound and outbound parameters should be configured in the same logical system or in a different one (in transaction we20)
Thanks,
RPN

For IDOC acknowledgement ,go thru this and do the settings :
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
This will help u :
Configuration Tips for a Business Service/Integration Process to send back ALE audit IDOC

ALE logical systems for business service or process

Hi,
I am trying to send an IDOC into my R/3 system. It is the same IDOC type that I have sucessfully sent out to parties. All the config is in place for communicating with the system, because I have sent others IDOCs in the past. However, they always were sent from another R/3 business system. They processed sucessfully.
I am now trying to sending IDOC's from a BPM,as well as, from a business service. They are under the "With Party" section of the directory. These obviously do not have logical systems, so when I try to send the IDOC I get
"Unable to convert the sender service Purchase_Orders to an ALE logical system", where purchase_Orders being the name of the business serice.
How can I handle this problem?
Should I hard code values somewhere?
Which ones?
I have read the other posts for the error above, but my situation seems to be different.
Help!
Chris

Hi,
To solve your problem, here my solution:
1/ In your Business Process of your ID (configurator), go to menu "Service > Adapter-specific identifier" and in the part "IDoc Adapter", write your Logical System.
2/ Create this Logical System on your target system (R/3).
WARNING: XI allows you to used a Logical System for only one service (Business Process). Thus, if you are several interfaces, you must used different Logical Systems.
Mickael.

Same number range for two different series groups?

Dear all,
There are two scenarios
1.Normal export under bond case, series group is 20 and number range maintained,running number is 300016
2.Another scenario,where ARE1 document generation for Deemed exp customer(already customised) , series group is 30.
But, client requirement is , for this second scenario also, system should pickup running number range of series group 20(under bond case) as per excise legal requirement
Ie running number is for series group 20 is 300016
For the above deemed exp case (second scenario)it should pickup 300017
And again when they do under bond case(first scenario), it should pick up 300018 like that
Is it possible to maintain the same number range for two different series groups(20 and 30)?
Even if you maintain the same number range for 30, as per running number range of 20
Will the system update simultaneously the same number range for 20 and 30 series groups?
Please suggest the way.

With two different series groups, it is not possible to have the same number range. Even if you maintain it, they will be treated independently.
Normally, you should not use different series groups if the same number range has to be used. In fact, the concept of series group has been developed to ensure that number ranges can be maintained separately.
Regards,
Aroop

Wrong logical system for prod categories

We had made a client copy and now the logical system name of R3MATCLASS in t.code COMM_HIERARCHY is still pointing to the old client; How can change we change this to the New client ?

Hello Rahul,
In case of client copy, you have to run transaction BDLS in order to convert old logical system name to new logical system name.
In this way, all tables containing reference to old logical system are updated with new value.
This should be true for logical system assigned to your product categories (table COMM_CATEGORY ).
Regards.
Laurent.

From R/3 to CRM create one logical system for CRM client 300.

Suppose i create one logical system for CRM in R/3 TO CRM scenario for client 300.another user wants to work on jdbc to CRM client 300 for this he wants to create another logical system for client 300 it is not possible,so,it is ok if he assign same logical system when he was working for CRM client 300 when he wants to create business system for CRM in JDBC to CRM.

Hi,
Business Systems are te logical system name for a CLient in the SAP.
These can be reused again for different configuration scnario that you must have created for different interface.
All you need to do is assing the Business system to your configuration scenario and Communication channel to the same.
Regards
Vijaya

Same logical systems for two environments productive

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for