Same query takes different time for two different users with same privileges

Hi,
Just wanted to know if it is possible for an INSERT query to take different amount of time for two different users for the same volume of data. If so, what could be the reason? I would like to add that we are not executing the query simultaneously. But it is always faster for user1(within 10-20 seconds) and slower for user2(takes around 8-10 minutes).

Show execution plan for each user. I think there is other reasons which you didn't not tell

Similar Messages

Query takes long time for first time

I have a table with 100 million records and another tables with many rows.
When I ran a query - it's takes about 1 minute to complete, but when I ran it again it takes less than 1 second to complete.
Why it is happening?
Thanks,
Tz.

Welcome to the forum.
When you post a question always provide your 4 digit Oracle version. Different versions have different functionality and this can affect your results and the advice you need.
For performance tuning questions see the FAQ (upper right corner of page) for the information needed for tuning requests.
>
When I ran a query
>
How did you run it? Did you use sql*plus, sqldeveloper, some other tool?
What command did you enter?
Using sql*plus you can get an execution plan for the query by
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select * from emp;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |    14 |   546 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP |    14 |   546 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL>

'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time

Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian

What is the reason for query take more time to execute

Hi,
What is the reason for the query take more time inside procedure.
but if i execute that query alone then it excute within a minutes.
query includes update and insert.

I have a insert and update query when I execute
without Procedure then that query execute faster but
If I execute inside procedure then It takes 2 hours
to execute.Put you watch 2 hours back and the problem will disappear.
do you understand what I want to say?I understood what you wanted to say and I understood you didn't understood what I said.
What does the procedure, what does the query, how can you say the query does the same as the procedure that takes longer. You didn't say anything useful to have an idea of what you're talking about.
Everyone knows what means that something is slower than something else, but it means nothing if you don't say what you're talking about.
To begin with something take a look at this
When your query takes too long ...
especially the part regarding the trace.
Bye Alessandro

Can you have two different users with itune accounts on the same computer?

Can you have two different users with separate itune accounts on the same Ipad?

Yes, create another user profile on the computer and each user can log into their own profile that way.

Can 2 different users with 2 different Iphones use the same itunes to backup each phone separately? if not how can I have a backup for 2 different iphones on the same laptop?

can 2 different users with 2 different Iphones use the same itune program to backup each phone separately? if not how can I have a backup for 2 different iphones on the same laptop?

Here is your answer:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495

How do I create different contacts lists for two iphone/users?

How do I create different contacts lists for two iphone/users?

Sorry. This doesn't make a lot of sense. Each iPhone user should have their own cloud accounts with which to sync contacts.
The iPhone is not a multi-user device.

Query Take more time on timesten

Hi
One query takes lot of time on timesten , while the same query takes less time on oracle
Query :-
select *
                from (SELECT RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                             RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                             RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                            NVL(RELD_ACC_TYPE, 0) ACC_TYPE, --END ASHA
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_RTO_EXP), -1), 2) RTO_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_NE_EXP), -1), 2) NET_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_MAR_UTILIZATION), -1),
                                   2) MAR_EXP,
                             ROUND(decode(sign(sum(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          -1,
                                          abs(sum(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          0),
                                   2) M2M_EXP,
                             NVL(OLM_SUSPNSN_FLG, 'A') SUSPNSN_FLG,
                             EM_RP_PROFILE_ID
                        FROM ENTITY_MASTER         A,
                             ORDER_LMT_MASTER      B,
                             RMS_ENTITY_LIMIT_DTLS C
                       WHERE A.EM_CONTROLLER_ID = 100100010000
                         AND A.EM_ENTITY_ID = C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID
                         AND C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID = B.OLM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE = 'E'
                         AND C.RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID = B.OLM_EXCH_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID <> 'ALL'
                         AND B.OLM_SEM_SMST_SECURITY_ID(+) =
                             'ALL'
                         AND ((A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE IN ('CL') AND
                             A.EM_CLIENT_TYPE <> 'CC') OR
                             A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE <> 'CL')
                         AND B.OLM_PRODUCT_ID(+) = 'M' --Added by Harshit Shah on 4th June 09
                       GROUP BY RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                                RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                                RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                                RELD_ACC_TYPE,
                                OLM_SUSPNSN_FLG,
                                EM_RP_PROFILE_ID,
                                OLM_PRODUCT_ID
                      UNION --union all removed by pramod on 08-jan-2012 as it was giving multiple rows
                      SELECT RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                             RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                             RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE SEGMENTID,
                           NVL(RELD_ACC_TYPE, 0) ACC_TYPE, --END ASHA
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_RTO_EXP), -1), 2) RTO_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_NE_EXP), -1), 2) NET_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_MAR_UTILIZATION), -1),
                                   2) MAR_EXP,
                             ROUND(decode(sign(SUM(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          -1,
                                          abs(SUM(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          0),
                                   2) M2M_EXP,
                             NVL(OLM_SUSPNSN_FLG, 'A') SUSPNSN_FLG,
                             EM_RP_PROFILE_ID
                        FROM ENTITY_MASTER         A,
                             ORDER_LMT_MASTER      B,
                             RMS_ENTITY_LIMIT_DTLS C
                       WHERE A.EM_CONTROLLER_ID = 100100010000
                         AND A.EM_ENTITY_ID = B.OLM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID
                         AND B.OLM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID = C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE = 'E'
                         AND B.OLM_EXCH_ID = 'ALL'
                         AND B.OLM_SEM_SMST_SECURITY_ID(+) =
                             'ALL'
                         AND ((A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE IN ('CL') AND
                             A.EM_CLIENT_TYPE <> 'CC') OR
                             A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE <> 'CL')
                         AND B.OLM_PRODUCT_ID(+) = 'M' --Added by Harshit Shah on 4th June 09
                       GROUP BY RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                                RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                                RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                                RELD_ACC_TYPE,
                                OLM_SUSPNSN_FLG,
                                EM_RP_PROFILE_ID,
                                OLM_PRODUCT_ID
                      UNION --union all removed by pramod on 08-jan-2012 as it was giving multiple rows
                      SELECT RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                             RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                             RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                             NVL(RELD_ACC_TYPE, 0) ACC_TYPE, --END ASHA
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_RTO_EXP), -1), 2) RTO_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_NE_EXP), -1), 2) NET_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(sum(RELD_MAR_UTILIZATION), -1),
                                   2) MAR_EXP,
                             ROUND(decode(sign(sum(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          -1,
                                          abs(sum(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          0),
                                   2) M2M_EXP,
                             NVL(OLIM_SUSPNSN_FLG, 'A') SUSPNSN_FLG,
                             EM_RP_PROFILE_ID
                        FROM ENTITY_MASTER             A,
                             DRV_ORDER_INST_LMT_MASTER B,
                             RMS_ENTITY_LIMIT_DTLS     C
                       WHERE A.EM_CONTROLLER_ID = 100100010000
                         AND A.EM_ENTITY_ID = C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID
                         AND C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID =
                             B.OLIM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE = 'D'
                         AND C.RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID = B.OLIM_EXCH_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID <> 'ALL'
                         AND B.OLIM_INSTRUMENT_ID(+) = 'ALL'
                         AND ((A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE IN ('CL') AND
                             A.EM_CLIENT_TYPE <> 'CC') OR
                             A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE <> 'CL')
                       GROUP BY RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                                RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                                RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                                RELD_ACC_TYPE,
                                OLIM_SUSPNSN_FLG,
                                EM_RP_PROFILE_ID
                      UNION --union all removed by pramod on 08-jan-2012 as it was giving multiple rows
                      SELECT RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                             RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                             RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE SEGMENTID,
                             NVL(RELD_ACC_TYPE, 0) ACC_TYPE, --END ASHA
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_RTO_EXP), -1), 2) RTO_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_NE_EXP), -1), 2) NET_EXP,
                             ROUND(NVL(SUM(RELD_MAR_UTILIZATION), -1),
                                   2) MAR_EXP,
                             ROUND(decode(sign(SUM(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          -1,
                                          abs(SUM(C.reld_m2m_exp)),
                                          0),
                                   2) M2M_EXP,
                             NVL(OLIM_SUSPNSN_FLG, 'A') SUSPNSN_FLG,
                             EM_RP_PROFILE_ID
                        FROM ENTITY_MASTER             A,
                             DRV_ORDER_INST_LMT_MASTER B,
                             RMS_ENTITY_LIMIT_DTLS     C
                       WHERE A.EM_CONTROLLER_ID = 100100010000
                         AND A.EM_ENTITY_ID = B.OLIM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID
                         AND B.OLIM_EPM_EM_ENTITY_ID =
                             C.RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID(+)
                         AND C.RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE = 'D'
                         AND B.OLIM_EXCH_ID = 'ALL'
                         AND B.OLIM_INSTRUMENT_ID(+) = 'ALL'
                         AND ((A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE IN ('CL') AND
                             A.EM_CLIENT_TYPE <> 'CC') OR
                             A.EM_ENTITY_TYPE <> 'CL')
                       GROUP BY RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                                RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID,
                                RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                                RELD_ACC_TYPE,
                                OLIM_SUSPNSN_FLG,
                                EM_RP_PROFILE_ID)
               ORDER BY RELD_EM_ENTITY_ID,
                        RELD_SEGMENT_TYPE,
                        RELD_EXM_EXCH_ID;
Please suggest what should i check for this.

As always when examining SQL performance, start by checking the query execution plan. If you use ttIsql you can just prepend EXPLAIN to the query and the plan will be displayed. e.g.
EXPLAIN select ...........;
Check the plan is optimal and all necessary indexes are in place. You may need to add indexes depending o what the plan shows.
Please note that Oracle database can, and usually does, execute many types of query in parallel using multiple CPU cores. TimesTen does not currently support parallelisation of individual queries. Hence in some cases Oracle database may indeed be faster than TimesTen due to the parallel execution that occurs in Oracle.
Chris

Generate query at a time & connect two database ?

Hi
Could u help me? it is necessary that
I have two database ( RSHPL,RSPL) and both data base have same table name and same fieldname (Table Name :-OITM, Fieldname :ONHAND ,pk- ITEMcode,)
At first I tell u what I want?
I want to generate query at a time & connect two database and same table name(OITM) to select the TOTAL VALUE of this field(ONHAND) and pk-key is Itemcode.
Is it Possible? If Possible plz write this query and send me.

Hi,
I don't think its possible to write a query from within SAP that allows you to get data from another SAP database.
I have used SQL Reporting Services to report on data from multiple databases, and this works very well for many of my clients. It depends on what you want to do with the data, do you need to display it on the screen in SAP and it to a field or will a report suffice?
Regards,
Adrian

Why update query takes long time ?

Hello everyone;
My update query takes long time. In emp ( self testing) just having 2 records.
when i issue update query , it takes long time;
SQL> select * from emp;
EID ENAME     EQUAL     ESALARY     ECITY    EPERK       ECONTACT_NO
      2   rose              mca                  22000   calacutta                   9999999999
      1   sona             msc                  17280    pune                          9999999999
Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
SQL> update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1';
update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1'
* ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
Elapsed: 00:01:11.72
SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
update emp set esalary=15000
* ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
Elapsed: 00:02:22.27

Hi BCV;
Thanks for your reply but it doesn't provide output, please see   this.
SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
........... Lock already occured.
>> trying to trace >>
SQL> select HOLDING_SESSION from dba_blockers;
HOLDING_SESSION
            144
SQL> select sid , username, event from v$session where username='HR';
SID USERNAME     EVENT
   144   HR    SQL*Net message from client
   151   HR    enq: TX - row lock contention
   159   HR    SQL*Net message from client
>> It does n 't provide clear output about transaction lock >>
SQL> SELECT username, v$lock.SID, TRUNC (id1 / POWER (2, 16)) rbs,
2 BITAND (id1, TO_NUMBER ('ffff', 'xxxx')) + 0 slot, id2 seq, lmode,
3 request
4 FROM v$lock, v$session
5 WHERE v$lock.TYPE = 'TX'
6 AND v$lock.SID = v$session.SID
7 AND v$session.username = USER;
no rows selected
SQL> select MACHINE from v$session where sid = :sid;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "SID" not declared.

Select Query Takes more time

Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
                    FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
                    WHERE LEDNR = '00'
                    AND   OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
                    AND   GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
                    AND   VERSN IN GR_VERSN
                    AND   WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
                    AND   KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
                    AND   PERIO IN GR_PERIO
                    AND   BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
                    AND   PAROB IN GR_PAROB
                    AND   (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this

>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain!

Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

Hi ,
Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
where a.account_id=ah.account_id
and a.account_type_id=1000002
and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
AND a.account_balance > 0
order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
|* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
22 rows selected.
Index Details:+_
SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
32 rows selected.
Regards,
Bathula
Oracle-DBA

I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
AND a.account_balance > 0
You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
       round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
       nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
       to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
       to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
               'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
       ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
       decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
where a.account_id = ah.account_id
   and a.account_type_id = 1000002
   and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
   and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
   and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
   AND a.account_balance >= .005
order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
Try the query after creating these indexes.
A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

Takes long time for shutdown after adding to domain

Hi,
Workstation OS - Window 7
Domain Controller OS - Window server 2008 R2 standard
Following thing i have measure with Stopwatch.
1) When the laptop is in workgroup, it takes just 17 second for shutdown.
2) when i added the same laptop in domain ( corp.abc.com ), now it takes 1minutes and 22 second for shutdown. ( it just show shutting down screen )
Why the shutdown time increased so much?
Do you have any idea?
Note:- i have not make any changes in laptop, nor added any software. I have done the above testing because user start complaining that after putting laptop in domain it takes long time for shutdown. It's happening to all laptop where the OS is window 7
There is no logoff scripts / gpo's as well as we don't have roaming profiles.
Please advice.
Thanks & Regards,
Param
www.paramgupta.blogspot.com

Hi,
To troubleshooting this issue, please install Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit. The Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit contains performance analysis tools, and is designed for analysis of a wide range of performance problems including application start
times, boot issues, deferred procedure calls and interrupt activity (DPCs and ISRs), system responsiveness issues, application resource usage, and interrupt storms.
To get the installer, you have to install the Windows 7 SDK.
Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5 SP1
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3138
For shutdown tracing:
Run command:
xbootmgr -trace shutdown -noPrepReboot -traceFlags BASE+CSWITCH+DRIVERS+POWER -resultPath C:\TEMP
Collect logs and post them for further troubleshooting.
For more information please refer to following MS articles:
Long Shutdown Time on Windows 7 Ultimate x64
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproperf/thread/11a42a93-efd2-4184-9ce8-bbc1438b7ea6
Long shutdown time on Windows 7 64 bit laptop
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itproperf/thread/4440fc6e-c81e-440c-9183-9b7e176729d2
Lawrence
TechNet Community Support

Copying a query from different user group

masters,
is it possible to copy a query from different user group?
if so please tell me how
thnks!

The query made from SQVI is only intended for individual use. It cannot be transported and there is no concept of Global/Standard area. To be able to transport or share the query to other users is by converting it to SAP Query wherein the source of data will also be converted to an Infoset. Remember that is done in the Standard query area. To do this, go to SQVI-> click SAP Query then go to menu Query -> Convert Quickviews... Select your Quickview queries and provide and infoset name.

Spool printing takes a long time for just one user

Hello,
Could someone please guide on what could be the reason that spool printing takes a long time for just one user ?
I've monitored all the spool processes through SM50, and I've found that a very long time elapses before the printing job appears in one of the four spool processes.
Thanks in advance.
Reda

Hi,
very long time elapses before the printing job appears in one of the four spool processes.
can u check the trace file(Red color error) of that spool process. Also can u see if there are any system logs in SM21 related to that spool request.
Also see how many pages the user is giving print @ 1 shot. Suppose if the printer to whcih the user is giving print is a network printer, see the network response time.
Have u tried to ask the same user to give print to some other printer. Also have u asked some other user to print to that problematic printer. Check the responses under this scenario also.
Regards,
Ravi

Same query takes different time for two different users with same privileges

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for