SAP Integrator Configuration

Hi all,
The customer, I am working for, likes to evaluate the integrator. I want to configure the SAP Integrator. But I have no experience with SAP, so I'd like to ask you for a little help.
Our environment:
OWB Client: 10.1.0.2.0 (NT 4.0/XP)
OWB Repository: 10.1.0.1.0 (NT 4.0/XP)
Oracle Server: 9.2.0.4 (Solaris)
SAP Version R/3 46c
librfc32.dll Version: 6203, 3, 606, 3864
Question 1:
What kind of SAP user ("OWB") is required: SAP privileges, Oracle privileges, other properties?
Question 2:
I saw that there are different experiences in using the
librfc32.dll: Is our version "6203, 3, 606, 3864" feasible? What is correct path: HOME/bin or HOME/bin/admin or HOME/owb/bin/admin or c:/winnt?
Question 3:
Are there any requirements on the OWB server side, maybe recommendations of your's that are not mentioned in the User Guide?
Thank you all in advance for your help.
Bye and greetings from good old Germany,
Werner

Hi Werner,
Q1: A fairly highly privileged user is needed to be able to read the SAP dictionary. Unfortunately I don't know the correct terms in the SAP world, but your SAP administrator would.
Q2: This is covered in the User's Guide http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/html/B12146_01/sap.htm#sthref3330
The dll OWB is certified with is
File Version: 4640,5,123,2956
Build: Wednesday, August 09 23:46:33 2000
File Size: 1,945,138 bytes
Product Version: 46D,123
ORACLE_HOME\bin\admin, where ORACLE_HOME is the Oracle home path name for the Warehouse Builder.
Q3: Just what is in the User Guide (Chapter 21) and in the SAP Data Sheet http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/warehouse/pdf/SAP_DataSheet.pdf
Nikolai Rochnik

Similar Messages

Integrated Configurations com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception

Hi guys,
we are using PI 7.11.
With this release local processing on the advanced adapter engine is possible, when using integrated configurations.
This works fine.
Lately I faced an error situation in an RFC to JDBC scenario, when one field doesn´t meet the conditions of the database.
I tried to dig deeper to identify the incorrect value by switch on the trace in the receiver JDBC channel, as I did several times before.
Afterwards I treied to restart the message.
Following error occurs.
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: Unable to retrieve interface determination with object ID ab1bf720bf2711dea7d2020000000030 from CPA cache.
I made some test with integrated configurations (FTP to FTP) and come to the result that errors, which require changes on the communication channel e.g. wrong password etc. result in an new object in the CPA cache
trying restart the failed message ends up in the error specified aboce.
Anyone faced the same issue already?
Kind regards
Jochen

HI Jochen,
I feel that you should once go for a CPA Cache refresh from Adapter Engine and try executing your failed messages once again in the adapter engine.
To do a CPA Cache Refresh from the Adapter Engine:
To trigger a cache refresh from the individual Adapter Framework, open a browser window and enter the following URL:
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=delta|full
The Monitoring url is like this:
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache
Check this How-to Guide on Cache, it will be useful:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c0332b2a-eb97-2910-b6ba-dbe52a01be34&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Dhwani

Error after uninstalling the SAP Integration Kit XI 3.0 on Unix

Hi all,
I have uninstalled the SAP Integration Kit XI 3.0 on a single solaris server installation. Uninstall was done exactly as instructed in the manual and everything looked ok.
Now when I try to go to the login page of CMC or InfoView I get an error:
type Status report
message /PartnerPlatformService/service/app/logon.do
description The requested resource (/PartnerPlatformService/service/app/logon.do) is not available.
Is the login page trying to look for the SAP authentication page that was removed ?
Is there some configuration still remaining somewhere that needs to be removed so I get the old login page back ?
Thanks for ideas, Timo

Thanks for pointing to the right direction. I changed the tomcat webapps web.xml file parameter and it was enought to start working again.
   <context-param>
        <param-name>config.logon.service.context</param-name>
        <param-value>/PlatformServices</param-value>
    </context-param>

Error during sync integrated configuration - incoming payload missed

Hi guys,
we are suing PI 7.11 and trying to use the new feature integrated configuration wherever possible.
Now I test a sync szeanrio where sender is SOAP and receiver is RFC.
The messages fails in SOAP Sender channel with the error that there is no suitable receiver found for this message.
During integrated configuration content based routing is used.
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Receiver Determination failed for message e54dba61-9ded-11de-801a-020000000038(OUTBOUND)
But the message fails without persisting the payload, so I could check what value is missing in the receiver rules.
Furthermore the message is only displayed in the sender chanel and is not shown in rwb
While using the normal way of messsage processing where the integration server is involved, such errors are persisted and the payload is also available.
Is that the normal behaviour of integrated configurations.
Could the behaviour be parametrized?
Any help appreciated
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi,
thanks for helping.
Because of integrated configuration the integration server is passed and there is no entry in sxmb_moni.
I already tried this blog, but it doesn´t work for me.
I changed the parameter according to the blog.
But the message content of sync messages are stilled deleted.
Does the parameter changed requires restart of adapter engine or complete java stack?
There two templates one called 'Usage_Type_all_in_One' and above there is an node named equal to the server node name. The parameter of which template have to be changed.
I tried both with out success.
Hopefully you could help me using this feature
Kind regards
Jochen

Integrated Configuration- Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender

Hi , I am using AAE in PI 7.1 and it is proxy to file scenrios.
When Ia m doing testing in Integration Directory in test configuration its giving me this error .
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> to receiver -BS_D_EPS,http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications.Qualifications_Async_Out: No receiver agreement found for , -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> , BS_D_EPS, http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications, Qualifications_Async_Out
( here it should take interface Qualifications_Async_In, but logs says it is pointing to outbound interface)
here when I am going in to trace logs then it seems that are not able to understand the receiver interface . rather then it is taking sender inface in logs..
In trace logs . I am getting
Receiver Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver - BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...extracting Receiver from Header: BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Interface Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) BS_D_EPS Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Operation Mapping
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping configured </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
I have developed the other integrated configuration scenario and this is working fine .
please let me know how can I troubleshoot it

I am using sender as Soap and receiver as File adapter.
here the problem is that while going for interface deteremination and receiver agreement it is calling to Outbound interface .
It should call the inbound interface. I put all the details correctly and deleted all the objects and crated again for both Ir and Id..
I put the name of inbound interface in configuration but while executing its calling outbound interface.

ABAP Proxy sender possible in integrated configuration AAE with PI 7.11

Hi guys,
we are running PI 7.11.
We have serveral scenarios where the senderis an ABAP proxy and the receiver is reached by a jave adapter.
With Ehp1 the SOAP adapter offers the possibilty to chose XI 3.0 as message protocol.
We use this feature already in scenarios where ABAP proxy is receiver.
But is it also possible to use it at sender side?
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi Volker,
thanks for your help.
You could also use ABAP proxy at sender side during integrated configuration.
Prerequisite is to implement SAP note 1349125 and use following url for acessing the PI from SAP backends.
http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?ximessage=true
With this URL you could ABAP proxies in normal scenarios where integration server is involved as well as in integrated configurations.
Kind regards
Jochen

PI 7.1 Integrated Configuration for AAE - Issue Accessing Attachment

Hello All,
PI 7.1 in its new features allows access to the Attachment using UDF's withing Graphical Mapping.
Tried this feature and works good in Graphical mappings; am able to access the Attachment; and write it into a Field on my target. This works with the standard XI pipeline steps of passing message from AE to IE back to AE.
When trying to use the same set up with the Advanced Adapter Engine, - Integrated Configuration; this feature doesn't seem to work and the mapping run time triggers a Null Pointer Exception.
None of the SAP documentation discusses this as a limitation of AAE and hence am wondering if this is a bug or is this a limitation? Has anyone on the forum tried this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Hi Bhavesh,
I also tried this scenario long back when PI7.1 was in Rampup mode. We tried and first part was working fine as you also written, but in second part we got stuck. After some research, we found that we cannot configure additional communication scenarios that contain, for example payload-based routing or a message split, with Integrated Configuration. You must define separate receiver determinations, interface determinations, and communication agreements to configure communication scenarios of this type. We can only configure communication scenarios where message is transfered withing AAE.
MAy be you need to check the receiver interfaces and Mappings or may somthing missing there.Also check for authorized Service User.
Possibilities are like something missing is in Integrated Configuration but not sure.
Regards
Aashish Sinha

BOE XI 3.1 + SAP Integration Kit on AIX 5.3 with WebSphere 6.1 (SOLVED)

Hi everybody!
On a recent installation I encountered a problem with SAP Integration Kit using BW Query with prompts; I want to share with you what I did to solve this problem:
First of all, the environment:
IBM Server with AIX 5.3
BO Repository on DB2 9.5
Application Server IBM WebSphere 6.1
BOE XI R3.1
Crystal Reports 2008 SP1
After installing and configuring everything on the system, I encountered some problem launching in InfoView reports created with Crystal Reports 2008 based on BW query with SAP Prompts.
The error that I recieved everytime was:
com.sap.mw.JCO.$Function
What I did to solve this was:
1) Configure the absolute complete classpath inside the Application Server (path/sapjco.jar)
2) Put the sapjco.jar version 2.18 at 32bit (unix version) that you can download at https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000463654&
Hope this helping you
Bye
Andrea

Dear Gurus,
The issue I am facing is described exactly in the document "Upgrading to CR 2008 V1 / SP1" by Blair Wheadon.
The problem occurs when installing CR2008v1 and BOE 3.1 on the same machine.
The solution is to download and install SP1.
Unfortunately for me, I have downloaded SP1 but the installation is not going well.
Message prompts that installation files are corrupt and that I should download again.
I have downloaded twice. And tried several times.
So I guess it might be due to the platform.
But why wasn;'t the message displayed after BOE3.1 installation was completed?
Do you guys have an idea?
Alice

Dynamic Configuration not working with Integrated Configuration

Hi All,
Dynamic Configuration works fine in PI 7.3 when Classical Configuration is used. However the same does not work using Integrated Configuration.
Scenario :
SOAP -->SOAP Synchronous scenario in PI 7.3 (Dual Stack).
Trying to save a value from Request mapping using dynamic configuration and use the same in response mapping.
UDF Code :
Request Mapping :
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1");
conf.put(Variable, a);
Response Mapping :
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1" );
string1 = conf.get(Variant);
Note : Using Integrated Config(AAE Processing) - Response header does not have DynamicConfiguration header node , but Classical Configuration has that.
Regards,
Parimala
Edited by: ParimalaE on Mar 1, 2012 1:33 PM

For us this is what we had:
This didn't work (getInputParameters is the newer stuff that doesn't work):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration)container.getInputParameters().getValue(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/0DFa00000008jis");
return "";
This works for us(we had to remove getInputParameters):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/00D3000000001X0");
return "";

Exception in Integration Configuration

Hello,
we get an exception in the Integration Directory when we create an Integration Configuration. When saving the changes we get the following error message:
Internal error: Link from Integrated Configuration | bs_cbp_c | http://BusinessPartner/asynchronous | BPartnerModifyAOut | | to object type "ifmoper" with role "IIF0" is not permitted
Can someone explain, what this message should tell us?
May it be that this error occur when using a service interface of type "Stateless (XI-3.0 compatible)"? This is the case here...
We are running on a SAP PI 7.1 EhP1...
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Lars

Hello Lars
There are some known issues in this area. See the notes below:
1) #1338699 Assigned users in Integrated Configuration
2) #1322118 Expression Editor in Integrated Configuration
I recommend that you apply the latest XI patches for your current SP release. This way you will have all the latest bug fixes. See note #1335523 FAQ: Deployment PI Patches in Release 7.1 and higher.
Regards
Mark

SystemAck in integrated configuration

Hello all.
I have configured an integrated configuration for a proxy -> soap scenario.
The sender adapter - is SOAP with XI 3.0 protocol.
in the section: HTTP Destination (from NWA) - I have written the ECC HTTP destination
(defined with url: http://<ecc server>:8000/sap/XI/engine/?type=entry )
The messages go out ok, but when I look in the ECC - the proxy doesn't get a system ack.
When I look in the message monitoring in the PI - I can see the SystemAck in successful, and in Transport part it says:
Loopback - so it seems that the ack is not being sent out of the PI.
Is there anything else to configure to make the ack to be sent back to the ECC?
Any help will be appreciated.

Hi,
Did you request this acknowledgement while calling the proxy from the backend system? This is a prerequisite to receiving it there. See an example of how to do it here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f4/8620c6b58c422c960c53f3ed71b432/content.htm
Also, see section 5. Limitation of this document below - it says that acks are not supported by ICO.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/70066f78-7794-2c10-2e8c-cb967cef407b
However, I remember setting it up once and acks were sometimes sent properly. In particular, System OK acks were sent. But when an error occurred during mapping, no ack reached the backend system.
Hope this helps,
Greg

Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring

Hello All
I am trying to understand how Integrated Configuration works in the runtime and things look rather neat to me with my scenario working.
But monitoring this in the RWB, few questions cropped up, which I hope someone can help answer:
1. Inbound and Outbound Payload Monitoring
When message get processed within the Integration Engine, we can see the input payload and also the output of the mapping. In the case of the Integrated Configuration, is this not possible? I don't see any new special window open and hence how is the monitoring of the various steps specifically input and output done?
2. Mapping Trace not accessible
To further analyze what is new, we put a few standard XI trace steps into the mapping to see where these traces are displayed in the runtime. We thought it would be a part of the Audit Log, but it is not. Has anyone experience with how trace (custom mapping trace using the AbstractTrace object ) can be used with Integrated Configuration or is that another limitation with PI 7.1 and the Integrated Configuration?
To me these two are major requirements as a application developer to do my development and support and hence am wondering whether to gain performance have these options been eliminated or is there some set up needed on the server which we have missed.
Thoughts , ideas welcome.
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : You know what my questions to the Subject Matter Experts at the Bangalore teched are going to be

Hello Rodrigo,
Regarding monitoring of different versions of the message processed by means of AAE, this is unfortunately not possible in PI 7.1x - message is persisted only once in such scenarios (after receiver/interface determination). Multiple persistence of the processed message in Java stack is only available in 7.3x - there you have options for configurable staging (property xiadapter.stage.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) and logging (property xiadapter.logger.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) of the message so that several versions of the message (e.g. before mapping and after mapping) can be observed (incl. these versions' payloads). Technically, it is possible to setup staging/logging for different processing steps (namely stages - analogue of pipeline services in classical Integration Engine processing) - but, as I said, in 7.3x and not in 7.1x.
Speaking about creation of custom audit log entries, did you check SAP standard AuditMessageKey and AuditAccess for this? (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/3b/6fe540b1278631e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm)
Regards,
Vadim

Using new 7.3 Integrated Configuration Directory Services Objects

I am trying to use the new IntegratedConfiguration objects. I can get the wsdl, create the classes and run everything in my local PC. However when I try to deploy the generated jar file in the PI 7.3 ESR it fails because some of the generated names for the Integrated Configuration resources are too long...longer than 180 characters.
Here is the error:
    Unable to import zip file COP_PI_GL_Integration.jar. Names of
    entries wsdl/com/sap/xi/basis/rootwsdl_IntegratedConfigurationInService_IntegratedConfigurationInImplBean/rootwsdl_importedwsdl_1_IntegratedConfigurationInService_IntegratedConfigurationInImplBean.wsdl,
wsdl/com/sap/xi/basis/rootwsdl_importedwsdl_1_IntegratedConfigurationInService_IntegratedConfigurationInImplBean/rootwsdl_importedwsdl_1_IntegratedConfigurationInService_IntegratedConfigurationInImplBean.wsdl
    are too long. Names can have a maximum of 180 characters
I tried shortening the names of the files before I generated the client for the Integrated Configuration and changes the name for the load in one of the files. After this change I was able to make the code work on my local machine and could upload it to the ESR. However, the code fails in PI because the static constructor does not find the resoruce...I suspect because the name is now different since the name of the file I used to generate things was changed but the actual resource name in PI has not changed.
In short, how can I add IntegratedConfiguration to my jar file in a way that will allow me to upload it to the ESR?

Hello Martin,
first of all thank you for your response!
Did you also face the following error?
"JAX-WS deployable proxy is instantiated with 'new' instead of been injected. Cannot find WSDL URL for service [class com.sap.xi.basis.IntegratedConfigurationInService]" occures in the method "getPort"."
Is it possible that this error is also caused because of the wsdl file and its' location?
What did you change in the wsdl file? The binding? Where did you store the wsdl file and how did you access it with your client? Code snippets are to much to ask i guess?
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards,
Dennis Root

BO XI 3.1 SP3 - SAP Integration Kit: Transports

Hi All,
My question is regarding the transports that need to be imported into SAP system so that it can connect with BOE. We are connecting our BW system with BOE, please let me know whether we need to move all transports in BW system only or we have to move transports in R3 system as well.
Thanks in advance.

Hello Ingo,
Please help us in solving the below issue:
We have installed BO XI 3.1 version with the following configurations.
Windows 2003 Server, SP2 64bit Version
Java: JDK 1.7 and JRE 1.7
BW: BW 3.5 version
BOE in Tomcat 5.5 App server
SAP integration kit 3.1 32 bit (51040568.zip)
The issue is that while integrating BOBJ with BW to import all the roles for SSO, we are unable to find the exact JCO files for doing the same. We tried with JCO 2.1.8, JCO 2.1.10 and JCO 3.0, but all the versions turned futile. After the initial installation with JCO 2.1.8 version (as per to Installation guide) we found neither CMC nor Java Infoview are working.
Please help us in identifying the right JCO for the proper installations and do we need to install SAP integration kit 3.1 SP3 ? This is pretty urgent
Regards,
Rajib

How to test integrated configuration?

Hi,
I've set up an Integrated Configuration.(ICO)
I know i cannot test from Tools >> Test Configuration
I'm testing from RWB, i suppose i have to put my xml using the adapter engine test message option instead of the integration engine test option. You think that is correct?
Whatever i do i still get an error message saying there is no receiver determination for the given business component and interface. I thought for ICO you dont need Receiver Determination? Am i wrong?
Are there other/better ways to test this ICO?
Thx
Robert

Hi,
Small recap of the issue: i want to test an Integrated Configuration from the RWB.
My scenario is File to SOAP (synchronous)
All cache refreshes both in SXI_Cache and CPA cache were good.
If i test from RWB >> INtegration Engine >> Test Message then i get the following return:
".... Error While Sending Message: Error stack from response: No receiver could be determined...."
(this response is understandable: ICO is not on the IE and the combination of Sender Component/INterface/Namespace will not be found there, so we get an error)
But...
If I test from RWB >> Adapter Engine >> Test Message with these details:
Sender Component = Sender Comm Component from ICO
Interface = Sender Interface from ICO
Namespace = Sender Namespace from ICO
User/Passw are good
QoS: Best Effort
XML = good
then i get the following result:
"....Error While Sending Message: Additional error text from response: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: ConfigException in XI protocol handler. Failed to determine a receiver agreement for the given message. Root cause: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.CPAObjectNotFoundException: Couldn't retrieve outbound binding for the given P/S/A values: FP=;TP=;FS=TEST_ICO;TS=;AN=SIOS_ICO_ReadCustomer;ANS=urn:vitens:isu:installation:create; in the current context [Unknown]. ......"
receiver agreement?
So i wonder if it is possible at all to test the ICO from the RWB?
Any comments are helpful.
Also i'm wondering if there could be installation settings wrong for AAE (we're on PI 7.11)
Or maybe there are settings in the Service Interface i should do differently?
Kr
Robert

SAP Integrator Configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for