Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring

Hello All
I am trying to understand how Integrated Configuration works in the runtime and things look rather neat to me with my scenario working.
But monitoring this in the RWB, few questions cropped up, which I hope someone can help answer:
1. Inbound and Outbound Payload Monitoring
When message get processed within the Integration Engine, we can see the input payload and also the output of the mapping. In the case of the Integrated Configuration, is this not possible? I don't see any new special window open and hence how is the monitoring of the various steps specifically input and output done?
2. Mapping Trace not accessible
To further analyze what is new, we put a few standard XI trace steps into the mapping to see where these traces are displayed in the runtime. We thought it would be a part of the Audit Log, but it is not. Has anyone experience with how trace (custom mapping trace using the AbstractTrace object ) can be used with Integrated Configuration or is that another limitation with PI 7.1 and the Integrated Configuration?
To me these two are major requirements as a application developer to do my development and support and hence am wondering whether to gain performance have these options been eliminated or is there some set up needed on the server which we have missed.
Thoughts , ideas welcome.
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : You know what my questions to the Subject Matter Experts at the Bangalore teched are going to be

Hello Rodrigo,
Regarding monitoring of different versions of the message processed by means of AAE, this is unfortunately not possible in PI 7.1x - message is persisted only once in such scenarios (after receiver/interface determination). Multiple persistence of the processed message in Java stack is only available in 7.3x - there you have options for configurable staging (property xiadapter.stage.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) and logging (property xiadapter.logger.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) of the message so that several versions of the message (e.g. before mapping and after mapping) can be observed (incl. these versions' payloads). Technically, it is possible to setup staging/logging for different processing steps (namely stages - analogue of pipeline services in classical Integration Engine processing) - but, as I said, in 7.3x and not in 7.1x.
Speaking about creation of custom audit log entries, did you check SAP standard AuditMessageKey and AuditAccess for this? (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/3b/6fe540b1278631e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm)
Regards,
Vadim

Similar Messages

ABAP Proxy sender possible in integrated configuration AAE with PI 7.11

Hi guys,
we are running PI 7.11.
We have serveral scenarios where the senderis an ABAP proxy and the receiver is reached by a jave adapter.
With Ehp1 the SOAP adapter offers the possibilty to chose XI 3.0 as message protocol.
We use this feature already in scenarios where ABAP proxy is receiver.
But is it also possible to use it at sender side?
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi Volker,
thanks for your help.
You could also use ABAP proxy at sender side during integrated configuration.
Prerequisite is to implement SAP note 1349125 and use following url for acessing the PI from SAP backends.
http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?ximessage=true
With this URL you could ABAP proxies in normal scenarios where integration server is involved as well as in integrated configurations.
Kind regards
Jochen

File to File USing integrated configuration AAE

Hi experts,
We have configured simple file to file scenario (File Tunneling) using ICO feature for Advance Adapter Engine.
While testing the interface we are getting following error in sender communication channel.
Returning to application. Exception: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Receiver Determination failed for message 10e9a7f7-36f6-49df-3690-d88314d156ac(OUTBOUND)
It is not able to determine the Receiver system.
Please advise...
Regards,
Deepak

The issue has been resolved now.
Solution:
There is a slight configuration which is required for the ICO to work with file tunneling with Dummy ESR objects.
In case, the incoming message is not resembling the Data/Message type please check the radio button as u201CNon Operation Specificu201D in Receiver tab of the ICO objec and ICO will work.
Thanks for inputs.

CAE - Integrated Configuration Trace file location?

Hi,
I am tracing some debug information inside an User Defined Function in a graphical mapping.
This mapping is used in an Integrated Configuration, so running only in the adapter engine. I usually see my debug trace in SXMB_MONI.
Can you tell how to enable debug on my mapping and/or where I can see the trace informations?
In the 'Audit' tab, in the message monitoring, I only see level 'Information' trace.
Thanks,
Martin

Found this post: Re: Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring
Looks like not being able to log is a feature to improve process speed.

Multiple Receiver Interface in integrated config(AAE)

Hello Experts,
We have a SOAP to RFC synchronous interface.There is a requirement where we have a Single Sender interface(Single Sender System) and based on the value in Payload we have to select either of two different Receiver RFC interface(Single receiver System). I am not sure whether we can select either of two different RFC interface for the same Receiver system in an Integrated Configuration(AAE).
Appreciate your help!!!
Thanks.

Hi,
Alternatively, you can opt to use multi-mapping, with the occurrences of each message set to 0..1. The interface is triggered via conditions. In ID, you would be declaring an Enhanced Interface Determination.
Hope this helps,

Integrated configuration with parameterized mapping

Dear All,
My scenario is using integrated configuration AAE. I am trying parameterized mapping with Integrated configuratiion but it throws an error saying that AAE doesnt support parameterized mapping.
I am uisng PI 7.1 I wanted to know doest PI 7.3 support this or which service pack on PI 7.1 support Parametrized mapping with AEE.
Any thoughs on this.
chirag

Hi Chirag,
Integrated Configuration Scenario with Parameterized mapping is not supported in PI 7.1, 7.1 EHP1 or even in 7.3
This is a limitation with AAE based scenarios. However, you can still use Parameterized mapping in Classical Scenarios(ID,RD,SA,RA). This is well supported in PI 7.1 and higher versions.
Please take a look for the CAUTION statement in the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/94/75de6590d64673b1e94ac072842ee3/content.htm
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Gaurav.

PI 7.1 Integrated Configuration for AAE - Issue Accessing Attachment

Hello All,
PI 7.1 in its new features allows access to the Attachment using UDF's withing Graphical Mapping.
Tried this feature and works good in Graphical mappings; am able to access the Attachment; and write it into a Field on my target. This works with the standard XI pipeline steps of passing message from AE to IE back to AE.
When trying to use the same set up with the Advanced Adapter Engine, - Integrated Configuration; this feature doesn't seem to work and the mapping run time triggers a Null Pointer Exception.
None of the SAP documentation discusses this as a limitation of AAE and hence am wondering if this is a bug or is this a limitation? Has anyone on the forum tried this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Hi Bhavesh,
I also tried this scenario long back when PI7.1 was in Rampup mode. We tried and first part was working fine as you also written, but in second part we got stuck. After some research, we found that we cannot configure additional communication scenarios that contain, for example payload-based routing or a message split, with Integrated Configuration. You must define separate receiver determinations, interface determinations, and communication agreements to configure communication scenarios of this type. We can only configure communication scenarios where message is transfered withing AAE.
MAy be you need to check the receiver interfaces and Mappings or may somthing missing there.Also check for authorized Service User.
Possibilities are like something missing is in Integrated Configuration but not sure.
Regards
Aashish Sinha

How to handle Integrated Configuration performance impact on AAE/Java AS

Hi there,
Recently I have moved a configuration scenario from standard flow involving both ABAP and Java stacks, to Integrated Configuration usage. Undoubtedly, this will increase the load on AAE/Java stack. However, do you have link to some clear (official - even better) guidelines - what configurational changes should be done on Java side in order to handle the performance impact of such transition?
Best Regards,
Lalo

Hi Lalo,
In fact, using AAE generates no traffic in ABAP stack at all (it is ommited when processing a message), while the traffic in Java stack should be lower than for normal scenario. The performance should be noticeably better, thanks to smaller number of persistence steps and no costly HTTP connections between stacks. For more details, please refer to this document:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/2016a0b1-1780-2b10-97bd-be3ac62214c7
Important quotation from this document:
Since the Integration Engine is bypassed for local message processing in the AAE, the resource consumption both in memory and CPU is lower. This leads to higher message throughput, and faster response times which especially is important for synchronous scenarios.
Moreover, have a look at this document, especially its beginning, for details about the architecture of AAE processing:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/70066f78-7794-2c10-2e8c-cb967cef407b
Hope this helps,
Greg

Integrated Configuration- Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender

Hi , I am using AAE in PI 7.1 and it is proxy to file scenrios.
When Ia m doing testing in Integration Directory in test configuration its giving me this error .
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> to receiver -BS_D_EPS,http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications.Qualifications_Async_Out: No receiver agreement found for , -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> , BS_D_EPS, http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications, Qualifications_Async_Out
( here it should take interface Qualifications_Async_In, but logs says it is pointing to outbound interface)
here when I am going in to trace logs then it seems that are not able to understand the receiver interface . rather then it is taking sender inface in logs..
In trace logs . I am getting
Receiver Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver - BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...extracting Receiver from Header: BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Interface Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) BS_D_EPS Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Operation Mapping
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping configured </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
I have developed the other integrated configuration scenario and this is working fine .
please let me know how can I troubleshoot it

I am using sender as Soap and receiver as File adapter.
here the problem is that while going for interface deteremination and receiver agreement it is calling to Outbound interface .
It should call the inbound interface. I put all the details correctly and deleted all the objects and crated again for both Ir and Id..
I put the name of inbound interface in configuration but while executing its calling outbound interface.

[SOLVED] Problem configuring DisplayLink monitor (udlfb...)

SOLVED:
It seems that my monitor shows no green screen when it is ready. Instead it shows the last image rendered. In my case it was this color stripes.
Also, I upgraded to kernel 3.2.1-2, and using the include module udlfb and xf86-video-fbdev from the official repositories I made it work.
I'm struggling to configure a Green House DisplayLink monitor to work with a netbook with an eGalaxTouchscreen. It seems I have problems with udlfb and the DisplayLink driver.
Following this artilce in the wiki, I installed udlfb and xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink from the AUR.
Loading the module with
# modprobe udlfb fb_defio=1
does not give any problem:
dmesg
[ 509.963703] usbcore: registered new interface driver udlfb
Plugging the monitor after loading the driver gives the following output:
dmesg
[ 637.363419] usb 1-1: new high speed USB device number 6 using ehci_hcd
[ 637.470050] usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -32
[ 637.701889] udlfb: DisplayLink GH-USD16K - serial #USD16K3310398
[ 637.701899] udlfb: vid_17e9&pid_016b&rev_0196 driver's dlfb_data struct at f377b800
[ 637.701905] udlfb: console enable=0
[ 637.701909] udlfb: fb_defio enable=1
[ 637.702124] udlfb: vendor descriptor length:17 data:17 5f 01 0015 05 00 01 03 00 04
[ 637.702132] udlfb: DL chip limited to 1500000 pixel modes
[ 637.702251] udlfb: allocated 4 65024 byte urbs
[ 637.785022] udlfb: 1366x768 valid mode
[ 637.785034] udlfb: Reallocating framebuffer. Addresses will change!
[ 637.788011] udlfb: 1366x768 valid mode
[ 637.788019] udlfb: set_par mode 1366x768
[ 637.793145] udlfb: DisplayLink USB device /dev/fb1 attached. 1366x768 resolution. Using 4104K framebuffer memory
But there is no visible change, the screen remains black. Nevertheless, there is a new entry /dev/fb1 as advertised. I followed the steps of the article but I didn't suceed. As I understand, the green screen assures you that udlfb is properly loaded and that the monitor is ready to use.
It seems that it is sadly not my case. Another strange thing is that if I load udlfb, then unload it and load it back again the monitor diplays green, blue, red and yellow stripes. But not the green screen.
I attach my xorg configuration, just in case.
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf
# eGalax TouchScreen
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "LVDS1"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "eGalaxTouchscreen"
Driver "intel"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "eGalaxScreen"
Device "eGalaxTouchscreen"
Monitor "LVDS1"
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1366x768"
EndSubSection
EndSection
# Green House DisplayLink Monitor
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "GreenHouseMonitor"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "GreenHouseMonitor"
Driver "fbdev"
BusID "USB"
Option "fbdev" "/dev/fb1"
# Option "rotate" "CCW"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "GreenHouseScreen"
Device "GreenHouseMonitor"
Monitor "GreenHouseMonitor"
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1366x768"
EndSubSection
EndSection
# Dual Monitor configuration
#Section "ServerLayout"
# Identifier "eGalaxAsMainDisplay"
# Screen 0 "eGalaxScreen"
# Screen 1 "GreenHouseScreen" RightOf "eGalaxScreen"
# Option "Xinerama" "on"
#EndSection
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "GreenHouseAsMainDisplay"
Screen 0 "GreenHouseScreen"
Screen 1 "eGalaxScreen" RightOf "GreenHouseScreen"
Option "Xinerama" "on"
EndSection
Last edited by gjasso (2012-01-25 13:22:29)

I use my DisplayLink monitor with a netbook. The best I can get at the moment is to use the DL monitor as my primary monitor in a []single monitor setup[]. This means that my netbook's monitor is not used at all (although in my case it is not vital, I would like it to work for watching videos or writing LaTeX code in the smaller screen with a big font size and read the preview in the bigger one).
This is the Xorg file I use:
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf
# DisplayLink Monitor
Section "Device"
Identifier "DisplayLink"
Driver "fbdev"
BusID "USB"
Option "fbdev" "/dev/fb1"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Secondary Monitor"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "External Screen"
Device "DisplayLink"
Monitor "Secondary Monitor"
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1366x768"
# Virtual 4096 4096
EndSubSection
EndSection
# eGalax Touchscreen
Section "Device"
Identifier "Integrated Graphics Controller"
Driver "intel"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Primary Monitor"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Internal Screen"
Device "Integrated Graphics Controller"
Monitor "Primary Monitor"
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1366x768"
Virtual 2732 768
EndSubSection
EndSection
# Dual Monitor configuration
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Dual Head Setup"
# Screen "Internal Screen"
# Screen "External Screen" RightOf "Internal Screen"
Screen "External Screen"
# Screen "Internal Screen" LeftOf "External Screen"
# Screen "Internal Screen" LeftOf "External Screen"
# Option "Xinerama" "on"
# Option "Clone" "off"
EndSection
I use xf86-input-fbdev for the DL monitor.
This has one major drawback: I've found no way to make this work dynamically, so I need to move/rename or edit this file whenever I want to change my setup (twice a day in my case). It is not absolutely unbearable but it is an unsatisfactory solution nevertheless.
Also, if I understood correctly, this seems to be a limitation of the current drivers (which include no 3D accel., so no GNOME shell for example). If you find a better way to do it (specially to detect the other monitor dynamically) please let me know.
PS: Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation.

Dynamic Configuration not working with Integrated Configuration

Hi All,
Dynamic Configuration works fine in PI 7.3 when Classical Configuration is used. However the same does not work using Integrated Configuration.
Scenario :
SOAP -->SOAP Synchronous scenario in PI 7.3 (Dual Stack).
Trying to save a value from Request mapping using dynamic configuration and use the same in response mapping.
UDF Code :
Request Mapping :
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1");
conf.put(Variable, a);
Response Mapping :
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1" );
string1 = conf.get(Variant);
Note : Using Integrated Config(AAE Processing) - Response header does not have DynamicConfiguration header node , but Classical Configuration has that.
Regards,
Parimala
Edited by: ParimalaE on Mar 1, 2012 1:33 PM

For us this is what we had:
This didn't work (getInputParameters is the newer stuff that doesn't work):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration)container.getInputParameters().getValue(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/0DFa00000008jis");
return "";
This works for us(we had to remove getInputParameters):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/00D3000000001X0");
return "";

Question about Integrated Configuration (Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7.1)

Hello,
When you use Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7.1 with Integrated Configuration scenario, it bypasses ABAP stack therefore you can't monitor processed message in SXMB_MONI. Instead this message shows up only in RWB Adapter Engine message monitoring. When you select the message from there, you can view the BEFORE mapping payload in Message Content tab. My question is how do you view the AFTER mapping payload when using Integrated Configuration.
Thanks,
Jay

> My question is how do you view the AFTER mapping payload when using Integrated Configuration.
You can't.
So first you have to configure a standard scenario and test the stuff. When everything is fine, remove the standard scenario and create an Integrated Configuration.

Parameter setting for RFC Lookup in Integrated Configuration

hi Experts,
I am using AAE feature of PI 7.1 to create a file to file scenario with mapping.
I have to perform RFC_LOOKUP in mapping.
I have Created a parameters in Message Mapping and Operation Mapping and performed required binding between them.
Details of parameter are:
   Name:         RFC_Lookup
   Category:    Adapter
   Type:          RFC
   Parameter: Import
I am using Integrated Configuration in ID.
Please tell me where do I assign values to parameter in ID when using Integrated Configuration.
Thanks.
Girish

Hi guys,
I have the same issue.
I want to use an parameterzied mapping during an integrated configuration.
But I don´t find any place to specify the value for the parameter.
Are parameterized mappings not possible with integrated configuration?
If I create an normal configuration using interface determination, I could specify the parameter value
Kind regards
Jochen

SystemAck in integrated configuration

Hello all.
I have configured an integrated configuration for a proxy -> soap scenario.
The sender adapter - is SOAP with XI 3.0 protocol.
in the section: HTTP Destination (from NWA) - I have written the ECC HTTP destination
(defined with url: http://<ecc server>:8000/sap/XI/engine/?type=entry )
The messages go out ok, but when I look in the ECC - the proxy doesn't get a system ack.
When I look in the message monitoring in the PI - I can see the SystemAck in successful, and in Transport part it says:
Loopback - so it seems that the ack is not being sent out of the PI.
Is there anything else to configure to make the ack to be sent back to the ECC?
Any help will be appreciated.

Hi,
Did you request this acknowledgement while calling the proxy from the backend system? This is a prerequisite to receiving it there. See an example of how to do it here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f4/8620c6b58c422c960c53f3ed71b432/content.htm
Also, see section 5. Limitation of this document below - it says that acks are not supported by ICO.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/70066f78-7794-2c10-2e8c-cb967cef407b
However, I remember setting it up once and acks were sometimes sent properly. In particular, System OK acks were sent. But when an error occurred during mapping, no ack reached the backend system.
Hope this helps,
Greg

Integrated Configurations com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception

Hi guys,
we are using PI 7.11.
With this release local processing on the advanced adapter engine is possible, when using integrated configurations.
This works fine.
Lately I faced an error situation in an RFC to JDBC scenario, when one field doesn´t meet the conditions of the database.
I tried to dig deeper to identify the incorrect value by switch on the trace in the receiver JDBC channel, as I did several times before.
Afterwards I treied to restart the message.
Following error occurs.
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: Unable to retrieve interface determination with object ID ab1bf720bf2711dea7d2020000000030 from CPA cache.
I made some test with integrated configurations (FTP to FTP) and come to the result that errors, which require changes on the communication channel e.g. wrong password etc. result in an new object in the CPA cache
trying restart the failed message ends up in the error specified aboce.
Anyone faced the same issue already?
Kind regards
Jochen

HI Jochen,
I feel that you should once go for a CPA Cache refresh from Adapter Engine and try executing your failed messages once again in the adapter engine.
To do a CPA Cache Refresh from the Adapter Engine:
To trigger a cache refresh from the individual Adapter Framework, open a browser window and enter the following URL:
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=delta|full
The Monitoring url is like this:
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache
Check this How-to Guide on Cache, it will be useful:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c0332b2a-eb97-2910-b6ba-dbe52a01be34&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Dhwani

Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for