Saving Searches Not Possible?

I find it difficult to believe that after multiple versions of Acrobat and its Reader that the ability to save searches is not possible, given the fact that a search can take hours when there are gigabytes of PDF files to be searched. Perhaps I failed to find the section in the help content that explains how searches are saved. Does someone else know how to save search results to be opened later?

Saved searches are not possible. Request it here:
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

Similar Messages

Saved Search Not working in WEB UI

Hi,
When I am creating a saved search for opportunity and run it. The results are activities, not opportunity. But it is perfectly working for other saved search (like accounts, etc). Please help me in finding the reason behind this.
Thanks.

Hi Stefen,
Thank you for the reply. There was misunderstanding in understanding the actual issue.
User faces the issue as follows:
"When they try to save a search for visit report, and run it later, they get the action items, not the visit report".
Please note visit report is kind of Activity. Also we havnt implement any badi for saved search. Even I doubt whether this is a standard functionality for activity/visit report, when saved search runs to display the action items.
Please help me on this.
Thanks.

Af:query saved search not getting deleted.

hi,
I have a af:query component in which I am setting saveQueryMode="default".
As per the docs, setting this value to default implies: "default: all saved searches are displayed. In addition any saved search can be created but only user saved searches can be deleted/updated."
I fire a search on the query component and then save it as "mysearch".
I then try to personalize it.
However, here I don't find the Delete button enabled for it.
I want the user saved searches to be deletable.
Am I missing anything here?
Thanks.

Simo,
I guess you have to look for MDS or Meta data service. MDS stores changes to the ui like table layout and query state for each user in a central store (db or file).
To use MDS you must use ADF security as this gives MDS the user ID.
I can't search for more info right now as I'm not in front of my pc. Check the doc for MDS and you find more info.
Timo

Saved search not navigating for only one user

Hi Everyone,
I have a saved search that navigates for all users except one. Furthermore, on that same search screen if I use a different object type, do a search and save it, the saved search works for that user. So it seems like it is related to the object type I'm searching for.
since it is working for some users, I don't think it is related to some IP or OP settings.
any idea what could cause this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Ralph

It seems someone has set the user policy at webapplication level for that user.Check the similar thread below
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/es-ES/18b4f019-093d-45f6-92b7-8350d13bd663/let-us-know-why-you-need-access-to-this-site-why-do-i-see-this-error-and-who-will-give-access?forum=sharepointgeneral
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

Saved Search not working for Oppt in Marketing roles

HI Team,
When i go to Business Role Mkt Manager or Mkt Pro and search Oppt and save them go back to the home screen and try to click on the search that i saved it does not do anything and this is specific only to Oppt and Quotation.All the other transactions are fine.Kindly advice.If there is a config for this or if this is standard SAP Functionality.

Hi Naveen,
This would occur due to missing customizing in transaction CRMC_UI_NBLINKS.
Here select the corresponding navigation bar profile and observe the entries after choosing - Define Generic OP Mapping. Check the entries for action search, execute and compare with the other profiles which you mentioned are working. Maintaining the same should rectify the issue.
Best Regards,
Venkat.

Fast file system search not possible in java?

hi,
I'd like to find all xml files on a disk as quickly as possible. The simple implementation takes far too long (e.g. over 30 seconds for a disk with 10,000 files and 1000 folders).
This is a network drive, but the reason I think 30 seconds is slow is that the equivalent C code does it in much less time (over the same network conditions)
I've seen it run on a drive with 200000 files and 30000 folders, and this takes between 10-15 minutes, while C code takes around 1-2 minutes.
I'm not sure what the C code does exactly, and it may have access to much better OS calls than java can assume.
The only three things I can think of are
1) try to use fewer file objects (can't see a way of doing this)
2) try threading (i've done small tests before and not got any gain)
3) try using FileFilters (i've done small tests here too and not got any gain - I think they just implement what you'd do without them anyway..)
the other option is JNI but this is very bad since I need to run any many platforms..
profiling shows that most time is spent in the native code
17.0% 0 + 287 java.io.WinNTFileSystem.list
10.7% 0 + 181 java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes
but I've heard that switching between java/native is very expensive? so there may be benefits from doing it all in one go somehow?
any help would be really appreciated,
thanks,
asjf
ps. caching the file list is not really an option since it needs to run fast on new targets

heres some code that is much faster when I/O blocking is the main problem (seems to work much better on network drives..)
it uses a slightly bizarre (?) thread pool of workers that process a list of Invocations.
(this is one big file Pool.java)
asjf
ps. I don't normally write code like this :)
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.reflect.*;
import java.io.*;
public class Pool {
List invocations;
public void invoke(Invocation a){
invocations.add(a);
synchronized(invocations) {
invocations.notify();
//System.out.println("Added an invokation");
ThreadGroup threads;
Set pool;
Pool(int noThreads){
pool = new HashSet();
threads = new ThreadGroup("Pool of "+noThreads);
invocations = Collections.synchronizedList(new LinkedList());
for(int i=0; i<noThreads; i++){
Worker w = new Worker(i+" of "+noThreads);
Thread t = new Thread(threads, w);
pool.add(w);
t.start();
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run(){
try{
while(poolActive) {
int active = 0;
for(Iterator i = pool.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ){
Worker w = (Worker) i.next();
if(w.working) active++;
Thread.sleep(3000);
System.out.println(invocations.size() + " : " + active);
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}).start();
volatile boolean poolActive=true;
public void join() {
try {
boolean alldone = false;
while(!alldone) {
alldone=true;
for(Iterator i = pool.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ){
Worker w = (Worker) i.next();
if(w.working)
alldone=false;
if(invocations.size()>0)
alldone=false;
Thread.sleep(2000);
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
//System.out.println("--------------------------> all done");
poolActive=false;
synchronized(invocations) {
invocations.notifyAll();
public void status() {
threads.list();
public static void main(String [] arg) throws Exception {
long time=-System.currentTimeMillis();
Pool pool = new Pool(200);
Enumerater e = new Enumerater(pool);
Invocation in = new Invocation(null,Enumerater.getXML, new Object [] {new File(arg[0]),e.result});
pool.invoke(in);
//pool.status();
pool.join();
time+=System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("Time taken "+time+"\nFound "+e.result.size());
class Worker implements Runnable {
String name;
volatile boolean working;
public Worker(String name) {
this.name = name;
public void run() {
try {
working=false;
while(poolActive) {
Invocation i = null;
synchronized(invocations) {
while(poolActive && invocations.size()==0){
invocations.wait();
//System.out.println("Hello from "+name);
if(invocations.size()!=0) {
working=true;
i = (Invocation) invocations.remove(0);
//System.out.println(name+" processed: "+i);
if(i!=null)
i.result=i.method.invoke(i.o,i.arg);
working=false;
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
class Invocation {
Object o;
Method method;
Object [] arg;
Object result;
public String toString(){
return o+" "+method+" "+arg;
public Invocation(Object o, Method method, Object [] arg) {
this.o=o;
this.method=method;
this.arg=arg;
this.result=null;
class Enumerater {
Set result;
static Pool pool;
static Method getXML;
static {
try {
getXML = Enumerater.class.getDeclaredMethod("getXML",new Class [] {File.class,Set.class});
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
Enumerater(Pool p){
pool = p;
result = Collections.synchronizedSet(new HashSet());
public static void getXML(File file, Set result) {
File [] children = file.listFiles();
if(children==null)
System.out.println(file.getAbsolutePath()+" has null children");
else
for(int j=0; j<children.length; j++)
if(children[j].isDirectory()) {
Invocation in = new Invocation(null,getXML, new Object [] {children[j],result});
pool.invoke(in);
else
if(children[j].getName().toUpperCase().endsWith(".XML"))
result.add(children[j]);

Searching not possible

Hi
We are in SRM 3.0 and ECC 6.0, we are facing one problem regarding the search criteria..
When the user in Account Assignment select order and search for a wild search then it's giving popup message as
No values found
sameer

Please test the function RHF4_RFC_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST in Backend (ECC system) wit the following parameters
LV_SHLPPARAM = AUFNR
LV_SHLPNAME = ORDEB
LV_RETURN_ALL_FIELDS = *
If you get the results then the problem could be with the RFC.
Regards
Kathirvel

Two 'everyone' accounts in sharing and permissions, privilege is set to custom, saving files not possible! Help Please!

Hi!
I have an issue where many files have multiple users named 'everyone' in the get info dialogue box.
The first listed 'everyone' has custom access instead of read and write access.
This means that I can not save files without individually selecting them and changing this permission flag.
I have tried selecting folders and applying to enclosed items, I have turned off file sharing for the drive (it is a second hard drive installed via an optibay equivilent) and am getting frustrated having to unlock each indiviual file.
As you can see, there is a second everyone account.
This account does not appear on folders, so I can't apply changes to a group of files. If I select a group of files with the issue all sharing and permissions options are greyed out and can't be changed.
Is anyone else suffering from this, it is a new issue since upgrading to lion.
Thanks!
James

Hey stool,
Yeh so I took my Mac to the guy from the authorized repair shop thingo, and the guy was like helpfulness = 0
He had no idea what it was and offered to take it in for 24hours. I tole him no since I need my laptop for school work! So he said well we we could do a fresh install which in my case did NOT work!
So I'm still stuck with the same problem, 4 hours wasted for the fresh install and a repairman who has no idea what to do!
Oh well!
I'm going to go back to googling!

KM Search not possible ; index queue idle

Hi,
I have created an index and the data sorce is a folder containg a text file.
The size of the file is 500 Bytes.
The Application shows folloing errors:
Indexing document failed. null
AbstractTrexIndex: indexing some of the resources failed
Indexing document failed. invalid parameter for TRexTextMining request (Errorcode 9005)
Also the queue status remains idle- even after repetitive flush.
Kindly let me know how do I solve the problem.
My EP is 2004s SP 9.
Trex 15 SP 1
Regards,
Debasish

Hi Debasish,
Take a first look at https://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=105762 - maybe this corresponds to your situation?! At least, a complete restart could be a first fast shot...
Hope it helps
Detlev

MSS Approval of hours not possible: because record is changed?!

Hello,
I want to execute approval of hours written in CATS/ESS. Approving hours in MSS recorded on activity type and/or wage type is no problem. When I record hours on an plant maintenence order (AUFK) in ESS/CATS and I want to approve that record then in MSS after hitting "review" in the collective approval screen that record cannot be saved. The reason is "Saving is not possible: record has been changed".
To elaborate: If I enter an hour record for a wage type and one for an order number then in the approval screen after pressing "review" I can save the record for wage type, but not for the hour record for order number (reason is "Saving is not possible: record has been changed". ). Does anyone came accross this problem. There doesn't seem to be a not.
Do I need to setup something specific in the backend for approving hour records written on ordernumbers? I did not find any OSS notes concerning this matter.
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards,
Mirko

Hi Siddharth Rajora,
I've found the same problem where I can save when recording to Project System network activities using activity type, but data cannot be approved when using wage type to Project System network activities.
Based on the note 1125791, it states that a correction need to be made to the program, however, I've checked my system and it seems like the correction has already been delivered in my current support package. But still the message "Saving is not possible: record has been changed" is coming.
Regards

Yosemite: Saved search from Spotlight does not work the same

Hi,
I have various Logic Pro folders throughout my computer and want to create a Saved Search that brings all and only the Logic project files together into one place.
There's a couple of catches: the Logic file extension has changed over the years with the various application updates.
It would be nice to create a Smart Folder/Saved Search with something like File Extension:logic OR File Extension:logicx OR File Extension:lso
However if you just add these search criteria as separate lines, it appears they are "AND" filters so nothing shows up at all.
I seem to remember older versions of Smart Folders allowing you to have much more control over boolean search parameters.
After a bit of online investigation I discovered that you can do some more complex searches using Spotlight and then save it as a Smart Folder or Saved Search.
In Spotlight I used:
Kind:Logic -.0 -(crashed) -.cst -.pst -.prf -.patch -.logikcs
This cleaned out all the extra unneeded files and backups that are associated with Logic and just displayed only my desired .logic, logicx and .lso files.
Awesome! Then I saved it as a Saved Search in the sidebar.
Which doesn't work. Or at least the extra flags don't work. All I am seeing is the Kind:Logic again.
This is how the Spotlight search translates across into the Saved Search window (I can scroll across to see the extra flags). Any good ideas or workable solutions? Thx!

>
fromObject in the code above is a key (String) that I retrieve from the OrderedHashtable and clone it using the code above.No. How could that code possibly clone a String? Where are you telling it what the new String's contents should be?
(HINT: Nowhere.)
I guess there is a work around where I can check if the cloneClass is an Instance of String and just do fromObject.toString(), but I was curious to know if there was a change in the way class.newInstance() works in Java 1.5No, it has not changed.

Error while saving activity - it was not possible to save all objects

Hi
We are on ECC6 EHP4 and having just started to config EIC ERP, we have done some configuration and have referred to various SAP notes, the main note being 1052082 to set up case management. We have managed to create an activity but on saving we get the following messages:
Error whilce saving activity (message class HREIC_APPL - message number 246)
Activity was saved
It was not possible to save all objects successfully (message class CRM_BOL - message number 010)
We are not sure how to correct this, we have searched and cannot find anything relating to these messages, I hope someone can be of assistance.
many thanks
Julie

Hi Julie
There are list of items that dont transport or need to be updated via manual configuration such as number ranges, surveys, email addresses and several others.
Glad you figured out this one.
Jarret

Saved search for Photo Stream not working in Mavericks

I have a saved search for JPGs in my photo stream so I can easily access them via Finder instead of iPhoto. In Mavericks my saved search no longer sees my latest photo stream iPhone pics. Anyone else notice this? I can see them in iPhoto though. I've tried re-doing the search, etc, but it doesn't work. Any suggestions?

Oh man, I've been beating my head on the desk trying to fix this. The only clue I have is that photos taken from iOS 7 (vs iOS 6) devices after about a week ago (wasn't there an OS X update recently?) don't show up in finder the same. When you dig through the "sub" folder to find the long-named folders with the photostream files in them, hit command+i and check out the "More Info:" section. The recent ones don't have anything in them (see http://d.pr/i/WKzR). Furthermore if you drill down to one of those folders containing such an image (see: http://d.pr/i/nIUP) and try to create a saved search from there it won't show up (see: http://d.pr/i/FOri).
I even tried to create an automator to pull those images out, but when you're searching for a file in any of those new folders finder doesn't see anything.
Not an answer for ya, just more confusion. Let me know if you get any bright ideas.
-roccit

Saving of assigned item categories not possible

Hello Guru,
I wanted to create Open Items and Bank Statement Files using program RFEBKATX. When I am executing, I get the error message "Item category 04000 not allowed in accounting transaction 0200 / 0001.
So, I tried to add the entry 04000 in Accounting transaction variant 0001. The problem is, that it`s not possible to save the entry. If I try to do, I get no message that saving was successful and when I leave the table, the entry is not longer available.
Why is it not possible to save the entry?
I tried the same with creating a new Accounting transaction variant. The result was the same.
Best regards
Phillip

Dear Phillip,
The probable reason why you are getting this error is you are combining some cash transactions in the process which you are doing.
SAP would not allow you to change the existing transaction variants.This is a standard behaviour and there is no error. If required, copy the existing variant and create a new variant and include item category 04000( Cash) . Assign the same to your document type.
Strange that you are not able to create a new item category. I understand that system will not allow to create a business transaction, but create a new accounting transaction variant and have all your desired item categories.
Check the below path for customising
General ledger accounting(new)-Document splitting-extended document splitting.
Thanks
Aravind
Edited by: Aravind Aitipamula on Nov 11, 2010 5:16 PM

After Mavericks update spotlight search menu gone, not possible to use spotlight at all

Hello,
I updated last week to Mavericks and since the update Spotlight is completely gone.
It's not possible any more to get to the spotlight search at all. I checked the Spotlight in the preferences the keyboard short-cuts (apple default) are still enabled but nothing happens.
Even the spotlight magnifier icon in the menu bar is not there any more.
Can anybody help?

Some of your user files (not system files) have incorrect permissions or are locked. This procedure will unlock those files and reset their ownership, permissions, and access controls to the default. If you've intentionally set special values for those attributes, they will be reverted. In that case, either stop here, or be prepared to recreate the settings if necessary. Do so only after verifying that those settings didn't cause the problem. If none of this is meaningful to you, you don't need to worry about it, but you do need to follow the instructions below.
Back up all data.
Step 1
If you have more than one user, and the one in question is not an administrator, then go to Step 2.
Enter the following command in the Terminal window in the same way as before (triple-click, copy, and paste):
sudo find ~ $TMPDIR.. -exec chflags nouchg,nouappnd {} + -exec chown $UID {} + -exec chmod +rw {} + -exec chmod -N {} + -type d -exec chmod +x {} + 2>&-
This time you'll be prompted for your login password, which won't be displayed when you type it. Type carefully and then press return. You may get a one-time warning to be careful. If you don’t have a login password, you’ll need to set one before you can run the command. If you see a message that your username "is not in the sudoers file," then you're not logged in as an administrator.
The command may take several minutes to run, depending on how many files you have. Wait for a new line ending in a dollar sign ($) to appear, then quit Terminal.
Step 2 (optional)
Take this step only if you have trouble with Step 1, if you prefer not to take it, or if it doesn't solve the problem.
Start up in Recovery mode. When the OS X Utilities screen appears, select
Utilities ▹ Terminal
from the menu bar. A Terminal window will open. In that window, type this:
res
Press the tab key. The partial command you typed will automatically be completed to this:
resetpassword
Press return. A Reset Password window will open. You’re not going to reset a password.
Select your startup volume ("Macintosh HD," unless you gave it a different name) if not already selected.
Select your username from the menu labeled Select the user account if not already selected.
Under Reset Home Directory Permissions and ACLs, click the Reset button
Select
 ▹ Restart
from the menu bar.

Saving Searches Not Possible?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for