Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing

Hi Gurus,
We need to update Excise Base Value for Statistical Condition type. How to configure the same ?
Sl.No Pricing Condition Type      Active   Statistical           Passed to Accounting
1        MRP Price (Statistical)
2        Abatement (Statistical)
3       Surcharge (Active&Passed to Accounting)
4      Assessabel value (Statistical)
(No:4 This is the base for calculating Excise duties i.e Excise Base Value)
5       List Price (Statistical)
6       Customer Discount(Statistical)
7      Surcharge(Active&Passed to Accounting)
8      Net Price (Active&Passed to Accounting)
9      BED   (Active&Passed to Accounting)
10    ECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
11   SECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
12   Total collected from Customer(Statistical)
Issue: When there is MRP Price higher than the List Price, then the Cutomer will be charged on the basis of Net Price only, but the duties amount to be paid to the government on MRP Price. so in this case I can not calculate Excise Duties on the Actual Net Price condition which is active and passed on to accounting. And always the Excise duties to be calculated on Assessable value(no:4). But that condition type if I make activate then it will pass to accounting and also getting added to the Net Value(KOMP-NETWR). How to come out of this situation.(as per the customer requirement both MRP based materials and non-MRP based materials are also considered in the same sale order i.e with the same pricing procedure).
Becasue of this EXBAS is not getting updated in the J_1IEXCDTL.
Gurus, Share your valuable experiences and suggestions.
Thanks &Regards
Sreekanth
09611147585

Dear Lakshmipathi,
As per your suggestion, I have maintained Material Assessable Value and then also the duty values are calculating on the basis of Assessable value maintained in the Pricing Procedure. It is not taking the Material Assessable Value into consideration. And it is not getting updated the Excise Base Value.
In which case Material Assessable value will be taken into consideration?
How to update the Excise Base Value in J_1IEXCDTL tables?
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth

Similar Messages

ARE-1 Excise Base Value and LOU

Hi Friends,
This problem is in Exports(LOU)
1) In ARE-1, Excise base value is zero.
BED,Ed Cess and Sec Higher Ed Cess are flowing.
I want to know whether this should have some value or it should be Zero.
2) For LOU, Whether we need to Create Bond?
Please help me
with regards

Hi Prashanth,
Thanks a lot...
I have checked this,
1035545 -Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL
it is having the Solution as Apply code corrections.
Package name is SAPKH60009.
in my system it is SAPKH60008.
I think i have to upload this patch.
Once it done..i wll get back to u.
with regards

Excise base value not updated

Dear all,
We have found that excise base value is not updated after creating excise invoices,later we corrected it,
excise base value started updating in table J_1IEXCDTL,
Intially for 2 months excise base value is not updated in table,
Is there any problem will arise in future ?
or
How to solve this issue ?
Jeyakanthan

Awaiting valuable replies.....
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Mar 6, 2010 5:36 PM

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot

we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Dear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit

Updation of Excise Base Value in RG1 Register

Dear All,
I have maintained the Condition category as H in Condition Type. But still the Excise Base value is not getting updated in RG1 Register.
Please help me out with the solution.
Thanks
Tanushree

Hi Tanushree,
R u working in Ecc 6.0 or in ZYG?
To update the Excise Base value is in RG1 Register,wat u nid to do is assing Condition category as H.
Thanks
Kapil

Excise base value is not comming to are3 and are1

hi sap gurus
can any one tell me about excise base value is not flowing to are1and are3.

HI
First check your condition types here the condition category should be H. for your base price
Check these SAP notes
1171753 Excise base zero when excise invoice created in background
1035545 Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.
regards
Edited by: PRASHANTHgoud on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM

Table J_1IEXCDTL - EXBAS isnt updated -Excise Base Amt not flowing to ARE1

Dear Friends,
This is in continuation to the earlier post.......Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1...Iam here briefing up the earlier post details:
When I am creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice, Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1 but BED and other cess conditions are flowing into ARE1
Liable to AT1 and Indicator NCCD is checked and in my pricing procedure NCCD condition is not maintained as its not required.
The latest patch updated in my system is SAPKH600011 (Logistics and Accounting).....
Most importantly the Excise base amount field is not seen in the Excise Invoice but in ARE1 this field is in display mode and Excise base value is not flowing into the Table J_1IEXCDTL field EXBAS.
Someone Pl help me on this issue.
Thanks
Sasi
Edited by: j sasi on Jul 9, 2008 7:13 AM

Sasi,
I think you are making a mistake between manual and mandatory. IN the pricing procedure MAN stands for manual condition and mdt stands for mandatory. Now in the standard, the PR00 is an automatic entry and JASS is a manual and a statistical condition. It is not mandatory. PR00 being the base value for calculation of gross price/nett price it is mandatory.
Most of the customers prefer a manual pricing procedure where PR00, discount, surcharge everything is manual.
In such a case change the appropriate condition type to the manual condition with manual has priority in the settings for condition type.
But here you need to enter the prices and all the conditions manually.
Here you should have only one condition type for pricing condition with the category as basic price. PR00 is normally that condition and so is the P101 which is a Price ( STO). Now if there are several select all others to statistical and only PR00 with an account key assignment to ERL.
Ensure that JASS the assesable value as statistical and manual.
If however you want the JASS as the excise base amount then PR00 will be used for calculation of discounts and and NETT price only but JASS will be the one for Excise base amount.
BAsed on this excise base amount which you will find in the table J_1IEXCHDR the values for BED, ECS and SECS gets calculated.
Either way is O.K but one word of caution. There is an assessable value in the J1ID transaction where you maintain the Assessable value for materials. Its mostly used in TAXINJ. DO not use it or even if that field is filled ensure that you give the JASS assessable value manually at the time of calculating SAles ordr pricing.
If you don;t then there will be an error.
Also check in the analysis whch condition basis value is being taken for calculated in your excise conditions.
This should solve your problem.
Remember calculating assessable value is not a small thing but customers prefer it because reversing excise or paying additional excise is a pain for them. If thats the case then so be it.
But ensure that assessable value is calculated nett of discounts and given there.
In one case I came across where otehr charges, finance charges and transportation were added to the basic price and only on the total excise duty was added and discount was given after calculation of excise duty. Please check your scenario in line with your requirement. Any questions. My pleasure to reply.
regards
Jude

Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.

Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrp

Hi
I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
Rgds
Srini

Excise Base value is missing in ARE1

Hi All,
I am doing Export sale through u201CExports under claim of rebateu201D process, my customer currency is in USD (in CMR), and I have maintained condition record for price in USD, also I have maintained Exchange Rate in OB08.
In ARE1 I could not found u201CExcise baseu201D value (blank), if I maintain the condition record in INR, I could found Excise base value, what could be the reason?
Please suggest me that, how to bring the u201CExcise Baseu201D value in ARE1 if condition record for PR00 is in USD (CMR also maintained with USD)
Regards,
Ram

Hi,
Thank you for ur reply,
I have checked in Table (Excise Invoice Item) J_1IEXCDTL , I could not found "Excise Base" value (no value), but, as I have already mentioned that, if I maintain the condition record for PR00 in INR, then it's updating Excise Base. Is there any solution for this? (if condition record in USD)
For Excise Duties we are doing the round off, this is also affecting while converting the values with Exchange rate i.e.USD to INR. (Differance in values) how to avoide this?
Regards,
Ram

Excise base value missing in ARE1

Dear Experts,
In ARE1 document, excise base value is not getting picked. BED, Ecess & SHcess are getting updated properly.
Can anyone guide on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajeshwari

hi
check whether the excise base value in the table J_1IEXCDTL if not then apply this note
Note 1035545 - Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.
If the excsie base value is not updating then it wont come in ARE-1 and also check the table J_1IEXITEM for excise base value
regards

How to update excise invoice values after migo.

Hi Guru's,
I have checked the forum. but did not get exact solution.
Here im having the problem with bapi BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE . This bapi don't have the structure to update excise invoice values.
I have one bapi 'BAPI_EXCINV_CREATE_FROMDATA' to update the excise duty, but in that also i didn't find the structure
'J_1IEXITEM' to update the ECS value ( field is 'total_ecs').
Please help me on this,Thanks in Advance...
Regards
Naren

Hi Krishna
Do not do excise invoice capture during 103. At that time select the option "No excise entry". Then capture excise invoice during 105.
The system messge " No selectable items for this document" is prompted since the preceeding document is already assigned with invoice.
Try this and give feedback.
regards
sairam akundi

In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital

Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR

Dear experts,
When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
Please suggest to overcome this issue.
Regards
M.Sarathi

Hi,
When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
Regards
Prabhu

Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for