Seeburger As2 Receiver channel exception for large files

Hello Folks,
We have JMS to seeburger AS2 interface we are facing follwing issue in As2 reciver channel for files larger than 20 MB.But In Production it is wokring fine for even 40 MB also.
Delivering the message to the application usingconnection AS2_http://seeburger.com/xi failed, due to:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException:javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException:SEEBURGER AS2: org.apache.commons.httpclient.ProtocolException: Unbuffered entity enclosing request can not be repeated. # , SEEBURGER AS2:org.apache.commons.httpclient.ProtocolException: Unbuffered entity enclosingrequest can not be repeated. # .
Please through some light on the issue .
Regards
Praveen Reddy

Hi Praveen,
The problem would be related to server size. genrally test system do not have same sizing as production server due to that you can not process large files in test system.
check the sizing of the system.
regards,
Harish

Similar Messages

As2 receiver channel, SEEBURGER AS2: 500 Internal Server Error

Hi,
There is one scenario in our landscape, its running in production, Proxy to As2. The interface working fine for last 2 weeks, today its showing error in As2 receiver channel saying
Message processing failed. Cause: javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: 500 Internal Server Error # , SEEBURGER AS2: 500 Internal Server Error #
I have searched in forum, but couldnt get much idea on why this error encounters and how can we resolve it.
Kindly provide your inputs to help me resolve this.
Thanks,
Ruchi

Hi Ruchi,
500 means the requested server does not understand the request (the requested service is unknown). The reason is obvisiously outside of PI. You have to contact the 3rd party owner and ask why the system is refusing the request instead of responsing like before.
Regards,
Udo

Used to convert all my videos into iPhone mp4 format using Any Video Converter - then add it to my iPhone 3GS. But last few days, I cant add video files to iTunes. and the iTunes doesnt even specify the reason except for that "files are not supported"

Everyting was perfect earlier. Used to convert all my videos into iPhone mp4 format using Any Video Converter - then add it to my iPhone 3GS. But last few days, I cant add video files to iTunes. and the iTunes doesnt even specify the reason except for that "files are not supported"
Everything is fine.
-They are the right format
-Quicktime is updated
-I have tried simply dragging them into the 'movie' library
-I have tried going to file<add file to library
Nothing works, has anyone else had this problem and found a way around it?
Any and all help appreciated.

In addition to Mike's suggestions, you only have 4GB of RAM and Mavericks does use more RAM than other versions. You may also want to look at the apps that startup on login and the possiblity of upgrading RAM.

Thumbnails for large files

OK..so now I've learned that for my large panorama filesI wont get a thumbnail in the Organizer. Just some Blue Triangle warning with a exclamation point. I do allot of golf course work where I stitch phototos and print 38 x 11 inches @ 300dpi.
So whats the work around? Is this a problem in the Bid Photoshop program? Sure I can....copy the file...reduce the resolution..save it with a different name..etc.
What the heck! You can't tell me that the program writers at Adobe can make this work for large files! Why the limit? By the way...what is the limit?
Thanks

By the way...what is the limit?
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402760.html
Juergen

I am having issues today with my Adobe Lightroom 5.6 today that was working fine yesterday except for te files from one of my cameras showed up on import but wouldn't download, today I'm getting the message "Lightroom cannot start because it cannot create

I am having issues today with my Adobe Lightroom 5.6 today that was working fine yesterday except for te files from one of my cameras showed up on import but wouldn't download, today I'm getting the message "Lightroom cannot start because it cannot create files in the temporary file location /var/folders/jv/2bct456j0yg4ys681fxk9zq00000gn/T " don't know what has happended in 24 hrs except I did check my permissions on my main directory to ensure that I had extended permissions to all the folders contained within my main drive on my IMac running OSX 10.10

Use the trackpad to scroll, thats what it was designed for. The scroll bars automatically disappear when not being used and will appear if you scroll up or down using the trackpad.
This is a user-to-user forum and most people will post on here if they have problems. You very rarely get people posting to say there update went smooth. The fact is the vast majority of Mountain Lion users will not be experiencing any major problems with the OS, or maybe with apps which are not compatible, but thats hardly Apple's fault if developers don't update their apps.

Need PDF Information for large files

Hi experts,
I need some information from you regarding PDF related.
is there any newer adobe version for large files support - over 15mb, over 30 pages.
is it possible Batch technology with PDF
if not please suggest me Possible adobe replacements.
Thanks
Kishore

Thanks so long.
acroread renders the pages very fast. That's what i want - but it's proprietary:/
For the moment it's ok but i'd like to have a free alternative to acroread that shows the pages as quick as acroread or preloads more than 1 page.
lucke wrote:Perhaps, just perhaps it'd work better if you copied it to tmpfs and read from there?
I've tried it: no improvement.
Edit: tried Sumatra: an improvement compared to Okular etc. Thanks.
Last edited by oneway (2009-05-12 21:50:10)

Faster alternative to cfcontent for large file downloads?

I am using cfcontent to securely download files so the user
can not see the path the file is stored in. With small files this
is fine, but with large 100mb+ files, it is much, much slower than
a straight html anchor tag. Does anyone have a fast alternative to
using cfheader/cfcontent for large files?
Thanks

You should be able to use Java to handle this, either through
a custom tag or you might be able to call the Java classes directly
in Coldfusion. I don't know much about Java, but I found this
example on the Web and got it to work for uploading files. Here's
an example of the code. Hope it gives you some direction:

Seeburger AS2 Communication Channel Error

Hello,
when trying to send a test message to the AS2 receiver communication channel I get the following error in communication channel monitoring:
javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: ResourceException caused by com.seeburger.xi.api.cci.SeeXIDeliveryException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DTREQUEST and DATABASE.., SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DTREQUEST and DATABASE.., ResourceException caused by com.seeburger.xi.api.cci.SeeXIDeliveryException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DTREQUEST and DATABASE.., SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DTREQUEST and DATABASE..
Have you ever got a similar error? Seems to be a configuration error of the adapter installation itself rather than a problem with configuration objects or the receiver channel.
Do you have any idea?

Hi Florian,
Please provide info if there is a need for any Sender agreement in case we select "Synchronous" mode for MDN and Handle Received MDn as "NoAction".
I am also getting the below error for my scenario (IDOC --> XI --> AS2)
Description: AS2 Adapter failure Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DTREQUEST and DATABASE.. com.seeburger.as2.AS2Plugin.execute
Thanks and regards
Ajay Garg

File Splitting for Large File processing in XI using EOIO QoS.

Hi
I am currently working on a scenario to split a large file (700MB) using sender file adapter "Recordset Structure" property (eg; Row, 5000). As the files are split and mapped, they are, appended to a destination file. In an example scenario a file of 700MB comes in (say with 20000 records) the destination file should have 20000 records.
To ensure no records are missed during the process through XI, EOIO, QoS is used. A trigger record is appended to the incoming file (trigger record structure is the same as the main payload recordset) using UNIX shellscript before it is read by the Sender file adapter.
XPATH conditions are evaluated in the receiver determination to eighther append the record to the main destination file or create a trigger file with only the trigger record in it.
Problem that we are faced is that the "Recordset Structure" (eg; Row, 5000) splits in the chunks of 5000 and when the remaining records of the main payload are less than 5000 (say 1300) those remaining 1300 lines get grouped up with the trigger record and written to the trigger file instead of the actual destination file.
For the sake of this forum I have a listed a sample scenario xml file representing the inbound file with the last record wih duns = "9999" as the trigger record that will be used to mark the end of the file after splitting and appending.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ns:File xmlns:ns="somenamespace">
<Data>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001924"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001925"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001926"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001927"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001928"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001929"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"9999"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
</Data>
</ns:File>
In the sender file adapter I have for test purpose changed the "Recordset structure" set as "Row,5" for this sample xml inbound file above.
I have two XPATH expressions in the receiver determination to take the last record set with the Duns = "9999" and send it to the receiver (coominication channel) to create the trigger file.
In my test case the first 5 records get appended to the correct destination file. But the last two records (6th and 7th record get sent to the receiver channel that is only supposed to take the trigger record (last record with Duns = "9999").
Destination file: (This is were all the records with "Duns NE "9999") are supposed to get appended)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<R3File>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001924"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001925"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001926"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</xtract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001927"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001928"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
</R3File>
Trigger File:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<R3File>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001929"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Ccr_Extract_Code>"A"</Ccr_Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"9999"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Ccr_Extract_Code>"A"</Ccr_Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
</R3File>
I ve tested the XPATH condition in XML Spy and that works fine. My doubts are on the property "Recordset structure" set as "Row,5".
Any suggestions on this will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Mujtaba

Hi Debnilay,
We do have 64 bit architecture and still we have the file processing problem. Currently we are splitting the file into smaller chuncks and processsing. But we want to process as a whole file.
Thanks
Steve

Seeburger AS2 comm channel problem (B2B) - "perhaps AS2ID missing"

Hi guys!
We try to configure B2B scenario using Seeburger AS2, but communication channel monitor returns error:
Error type: COMPONENT_ERROR,NOT_TRANSMITTED >> Error date: 9/25/07 10:05 AM >> Description: AS2 Adapter failure Outbound configuration error: Sender configuration incomplete - perhaps AS2ID missing.. com.seeburger.as2.AS2Plugin.execute(AS2Plugin.java:321) [9/25/07 10:05 AM]
We're not sure about the scenario configuration and using identifiers (cos' this is probably the problem).
Did someone of u already configured Seeburger AS2?
We have configured in receiver party alternative identifier Seeburger - AS2ID, however, the message sent to target has always agency XI and scheme XIParty. It should be probably Seeburger and AS2ID (the alternative one).
<SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty">XXXX</SAP:Party>
<SAP:Service>BS_3RD_XXXXX</SAP:Service>
<SAP:Interface
How to achieve it?
Thanx a lot!
Peter

Hi Anoop!
Yes, we use it on receiver side.
ModuleProcessorExitbean exists, so it should be ok.
What I'm not sure about is the thing with identifiers..
In Party (let's call it X) - Identifiers, we have default agency http://sap.com/xi/XI, scheme XIParty and name X.
What values should be there for Seeburger?
We have Agency: Seeburger, Scheme: AS2ID; Name: X.
Is it correct?
We also received some 9 char long number - probably some ID to adapter(?). Any idea, if it is necessary and where to use it?
Is it necessary to configure identifier seeburger also in Identifiers tab of Receiver communication channel? Or we can leave it empty (both- sender, receiver)?
We use this in B2B scenario, of course: Target system is party, but we use our R/3 as Business System w/o party. Is it ok, or do we laso have to "be" as Party in our configuration scenario?
A lot of questions, but points will be awarded 4 sure
Thanx!
Peter

FTP Sender Adapter with EOIO for Large files

Hi Experts,
I am Using XI 3.0 version,
My scenario is File->XI->FIle, I need to pick the files from FTP Server , there are around 50 files in it each of 10 MB Size.
So i have to pick the files from FTP folder in the same order as they put into folder , i,e.., FIFO.
So in Sender FTP Comm channel , i am Specifying
Qos = EOIO
queue name = ACCOUNT
whether the files will be picked in FIFO into the queue XBTO_ACCOUNT?
So my question is,
what is the procedure to specify the parameters so that it will process in FIFO?
What would be the BEST PRACTICE to acheive it for better performance point of view.
Thanks
Sai.

Hi spantaleoni ,
I want to process the files using FTP protocol which should be in FIFO ,
ie.., Files placed first in a folder should be picked up first and remaining one next and so on.
So if i use FTP ,
Then to process the files in sequence i.e, FIFO
the processing parameters
Qos= EOIO
Queue name = ACCOUNT
would process the files in FIFO.
and to process large files (10MB size) what would be the best Polling interval secs.
Thanks,
Sai

Seeburger AS2 receiver adapter conf PI 7.1

Dear All,
I have seen a changed AS2 adapter on PI 7.1,the options are totally different than what we have in previous version of AS2 adapter.
I am looking for seeburger AS2 adapter documents and configuration steps for PI7.1 version.
Any inputs...
chirag
Edited by: Chirag Gohil on Sep 8, 2010 5:03 AM

AS2Receiver:
ModuleName: localejbs/ModuleProcessorExitBean
Type: Local Enterprise Bean
Module Key: Exit
-_Module Parameter_-
Module Key: Exit
Parameter Name: JNDIName
Parameter Value: deployedAdapters/SeeXIAS2/shareable/SeeXIAS2
-_Parameters Tab_-
HTTP
Server - Computer with listening AS2 Server
Port - Port of the endpoint with listening AS2 Server
URL Path - Path to the endpoint with listening AS2 server
HTTP Timeout - Timeout in seconds for waiting for server's response
HTTP Keep Alive - If enabled, the HTTP session is re-used. This optimizes the performance.
Basic Authentication
User - User for basic authentication
Password - Password for basic authentication
Realm - Realm for basic authentication
Proxy
Proxy Server - Your proxy server
Proxy Port - The port of the proxy server
Proxy User - User for optional authentication
Proxy Password - Password for optional authentication
Proxy Protocol - Select either - HTTP 1.0 or -HTTP 1.1
AS2
Compress - Select this option if the payload is to be compressed
Sign - Select this if the payload is to be signed
Signing Algorithm - Select an algorithm which is applied for signing the payload; we recommend "SHA-12"
Encrypt - Select this, if the payload is to be encrypted
Encryption Algorithm - Select an algorithm that is used for encrypting the payload; we recommend "RC2/128" or "3DES"
MDN Mode - SYNC to request a synchronous MDN; ASYNC to request an asynchronous MDN; NONE if no MDN is required
Receipt Delivery Address - Enter the URL of the Asynchronous MDNs that are to be delivered (i.e. the URL of your own AS2 server)
MDN Timeout - Enter a time period (in min), after which an outstanding asynchronous MDN will be interpreted as an error. The value "0" means no timeout
Sign MDN - Select this option, if the MDN is to be signed
Message Subject - This text is sent to the server within the optional HTTP header "subject"
Content Type - The content type should be set. A random content type can be set, but we recommend one of the following
= "application/edifact" for EDIFACT files
= "application/edi-x12" for ANSI X.12 files
= "application/xml" for XML files
= "text/plain" for plain text files
= "application/octet-stream" for arbitrary binary files
Delivery transmission report - A special transmission report is delivered to the report channel

Are the brushes in Photoshop CC faster than CS6 - still need to use CS5 for large files

Hey,
Are the brushes in Photoshop CC any faster than Photoshop CS6.
Here's my standard large file, which makes the CS6 brushes crawl:
iPad 3 size - 2048 x 1536
About 20-100 layers
A combination of vector and bitmap layers
Many of the layers use layer styles
On a file like this there is a hesitation to every brush stroke in CS6. Even a basic round brush has the same hesitation, it doesn't have to be a brush as elaborate as a mixer brush.
This hesitation happens on both the mac and pc, on systems with 16 gb of ram. Many of my coworkers have the same issue.
So, for a complicated file, such as a map with many parts, I ask my coworkers to please work in CS5. If they work in CS6 I ask them to not use any CS6 only features, such as group layer styles. The only reason why one of them might want to use CS6 is because they're working on only a small portion of the map, such as a building. The rest of the layers are flattened in their file.
Just wondering if there has ever been a resolution to this problem...or this is just the way it is.
Thanks for your help!

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
Note that this is boilerplate text.
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
such as your platform (Mac or Win),
exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
the type of file you were working on,
machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
what error message(s) you receive,
if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
etc.,
someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

SharePoint Foundation 2013 Optimization For Large File Transfer?

We are considering upgrading from WSS 3.0 to SharePoint Foundation 2013.
One of the improvements we want to see after the upgrade is a better user experience when downloading large files. It can be done now, but it is not reliable.
Our document library consists of mostly average sized Office documents, but it also includes some audio and video files and software installer package zip files ranging from 100MB to 2GB in size.
I know we can change the settings to "allow" larger than default file downloads but how do we optimize the server setup to make these large file transfers work as seamlessly as possible? More RAM on the SharePoint Foundation server? Other Windows,
SharePoint or IIS optimizations? The files will often be downloaded from the Internet, so we will not have control over the download speed.

SharePoint is capable of sending large files, it is an HTTP stateless system like any other website in that regard. Given your server is sized appropriately for the amount of concurrent traffic you expect, I don't see any special optimizations required.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.
I see information like this posted warning against doing it as if large files are going to cause your SharePoint server and SQL to crash.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/praveenh/archive/2012/11/16/issues-with-uploading-large-documents-on-document-library-wss-3-0-amp-moss-2007.aspx
"Though SharePoint is meant to handle files that are up to 2 gigs in size, it is not practically feasible and not recommended as well."
"Not practically feasible" sounds like a pretty dire warning to stay away from large files.
I had seen some other links warning that large file in the SharePoint database causes problems with fragmentation and large amounts of wasted space that doesn't go away when files are removed or that the server may run out of memory because downloaded
files are held in RAM.

Recommended Structure for Large Files

I am working at re-familiarizing myself with Oracle development and management so please forgive my ignorance on some of these topics or questions. I will be working with a client who is planning a large-scale database for what is called "Flow Cytometry" data which will be linked to research publications. The actual data files (FCS) and various text, tab-delimited and XML files will all be provided by researchers in a wrapper or zip-container which will be parsed by some as-yet-to-be-developed tools. For the most part, data will consist of a large FCS file containing the actual Flow Cytometry Data, along with various/accompanying text/XML files containing the metadata (experiment details, equipment, reagents etc). What is most important is the metadata which will be used to search for experiments etc. For the most part the actual FCS data files (up to 100-300 mb), will only need to be linked (stored as BLOB's?) to the metadata and their content will be used at a later time for actual analysis.
1: Since the actual FCs files are large, and may not initially be parsed and imported into the DB for later analysis, how best can/should Oracle be configured/partitioned so that a larger/direct attached storage drive/partition can be used for the large files so as not to take up space where the actual running instance of Oracle is installed? We are expecting around 1TB of data files initially
2: Are there any on-line resources which might be of value to such an implementation?

Large files can be stored as BFILE datatypes. The data need not be transferred to Oracle tablespaces and the files will reside in OS.
It is also possible to index bfiles using Oracle text indexing.
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/9i/FullTextIndexingUsingOracleText9i.php
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/itss/docs/oracle/10g/text.101/b10730/cdatadic.htm
http://www.idevelopment.info/data/Oracle/DBA_tips/Oracle_Text/TEXT_3.shtml
Mohan
http://www.myoracleguide.com/

Seeburger As2 Receiver channel exception for large files

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for