Seprate tax in F110 payment
I applied tax rate 5% to vendor invoice, say total amount is 3000 USD, tax:150, expense 2850, if I use F110 to pay, the payment log is showing 3000 USD, in tax column of payment log, it shows zero, how can i seprate tax in F110 proposal and payment
Dear,
Please check the invoice document once again and find out whether its an input tax. Entry will be as below
Exp ac dr XXX
Input tax ac dr XXX
To vendor ac dr XXX
So the system will pick the vendor line item which is 3000 USD for payment which is correct.
Similar Messages
-
I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.
hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?. -
Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting - Customer Accumulation -
We are using the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting for customer with the accumulation per month and checking the minimum/maximum withholding tax base amount to calculate the tax.
When we run the F110 transaction (Automatic Payment) the system creates a BIll of Exchange as Noted items and keep the accounting document created from the SD opened. After the customer pay the bill, the bank send a file informing the payment, then we clearing the accounting document.
But the system updated the WITH_ITEM Table and filled the fields AUGBL(Clearing Document) and AUGDT (Clearing Date) with the number and date of the BIll of Exchange that was created during the F110 running.
I am confused about this situation because according the Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting, the system only could updated the table WITH_ITEM with an accounting document. Noted items are not an accounting document.
I would like to konw if the system is working properly, or can have something wrong in our configuracion?
Thanks and regards
AugustoHi ,
In some countries there is requirement that you need to deducted Withholding tax either at time of Invoice or payment which ever is ealier . so if you get Invoice first then you deduct the Withholding tax on Invoice and define the tax type and assign to company . but if you make paymnet first which we called advance or down payment then we configure Withholding tax on payment .
If a vendor is liable for withholding tax on invoice it may be liable for payment as well if you think you may pay some advances .
Please let me know if you need more information -
Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run
Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regardsDear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri -
Open items (F110 payment proposal)
Hi All,
Can someone clarify what are open items
1: invoices that are not cleared
2: credit memos
3:credit memos applied to an invoice
4:residuals
(When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Prashanth1: invoices that are not cleared - YES
2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's? - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
VVR -
EWT-Tax on Down Payment and Invoice
Hello,
I've activated the accumulation feature in the Withholding Tax Type for both IV as well as Payments. The tax code is the same for both tax types.I've also defined the minimum base amount for Witholding Tax code as Rs.5000 for Official Withholding Tax key 194A and have also maintained formula for Tax code i.e tax should only get calculated if tax amount is more than Rs 5000.
However I've noticed that the tax is getting calculated on the accumulated amount of both Payment and IV separately.
Example:
Tax Type for IV is 01
Tax type for Payment is P0
Tax code is T1 @ 11.33%
I've made a down payment entry using T-code F-48 for Rs 4000 (Tax type P0 and Tax code T1). Now Tax is not getting calculated on this amount which is correct.
Now if I post an Invoice for Rs 1500 for the same vendor (Tax type 01 and Tax code is T1), ideally my tax should get deducted on Rs 5500 (4000 of DP and 1500 of IV) @11.33%. Howver this does not happen. The accumulation feature is working for Payments and IVs separately.
Can someone please help me on this. Is it a particular config which I've missed?
Thanks and Regards,
SumitaHi Sumita,
Please follow the below mentioned steps for this issue.
Steps:
1. Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting
Path: FA/****/Withholding Tax/Extended Withholding Tax/Basic Settings/Calculation/Withholding Tax Type/Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting
Here create 2 Withholding Tax Types:
1. 1st for TDS (Basic@10%) Tax Type: S1 and
2. 2nd one for Education Cess (EC@3%) Tax Type: S2
2. Define Withholding Tax Codes
Path: FA/****/Withholding Tax/Extended Withholding Tax/Basic Settings/Calculation/Withholding Tax Codes/Define Withholding Tax Codes
Create 2 Tax codes (One for Basic and another one for Education Cess)
In that screen, give the following inputs
Give WT Key also on the same screen
Save the data
WT Name WT Type Tax Code Base Amount Calculation
1. Basic S1 C1 100% 10%
2. EC S2 C2 10% 3%
3. Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Codes
Path: FA/****/Withholding Tax/Extended Withholding Tax/Basic Settings/Calculation/Minimum and Maximum Amounts/Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Codes
Letu2019s say there is no TDS up to Rs. 1,50,000 per annuam
Monthly amount or Invoice amount Rs. 12,500 per month
There is no TDS up to Rs. 12,500 and TDS will be charged if the salary exceeds Rs.12,500 p.m.
WT Name WT Type Tax Code Max Amount Minimum Base Amt
1. Basic S1 C1 99,999,999,999 12,501
2. EC S2 C2 99,999,999,999 375.03
4. Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
Path: FA/****/Withholding Tax/Extended Withholding Tax/Company Code/Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
5. Update Withholding Tax Codes in the Vendor Master (Employees A/c u2013 Employees will be treated as vendors here)
Give WT Type and WT code here
WT Type WT Code
S1 C1
S2 C2
Note:
1. Please follow the above example and apply it in your case.
2. We have created 2 tax codes for Basic W Tax and Education Cess.
3. Assumed there is no Sur charge.
Hope this is clear and let me know if you have any queries.
Regards,
Kannusamy S -
System shut down during F110 payment run
During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?Is it a matter of...
1. deleting the output of the payment run,
2. deleting the proposal
3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
5. start a new payment run -
Dear All,
We have a scenario where clients is having five plants under one legal entity.
Client wants F110 payment run separately for all vendor invoices specific to the plant.
For all plants , there are separate bank accounts and respective invoice must go to plant specific bank account as this is legal requirement of the country.
Could you please let me know configuration steps to manage this scenario.
Also can you let us know, how can we make payment to selected Vendors in F110 ( additional field tab).
In paramater tab,we have the option to incorporate the selected vendor codes.
In additional field tab,we have only 3 row with a range of Vendor codes.
Now i want to make payment to 50 vendors(specific to one plant) the vendor codes are 001,18,58,193,etc......how can we do this while we run the payment program.
Do suggest
RegardsWhen you are posting an invoice, some field in the invoice document must have plant information. Based on that you can substitute the House Bank. Lets say for example, You enter the value "Plant1" in the Assignment field of the vendor invoice. and you want to pay Plant1 invoices through house Bank HBK01. Then your should create a substitution rule saying if the value in say assignment field is "Plant1" then substitute House Bank field in the vendor line with value HBK01. If you are using a dedicated vendor number ranges specific to plant, then you can do the house bank substitution based on vendor ID as well, and then you don't have to enter Plant info in the invoice.
Then all the invoices will have right house bank data. Now to make sure that you are paying to vendor posting specific to a plant in the payment run. You can go to FREE SELECTION tab of payment run(F110) when you enter parameters, and in the drop down under field name double click others option and select the document and enter. and then select and enter the field that you are using to enter plant information. In my example I have used Assignment field to enter plant information. So, I will select BSEG-ZUONR. Then I will go to Values field and enter "Plant1". Then Payment run will pick up only "Plant1" invoices.
If you already using some rules to enter the house bank in the invoice, then you might not want to use the substitution rule. But find out which field in the vendor invoice has plant infomation, and select that field as i have shown above though FREE SELECTION.
Thanks
ROn -
I have the partner profile setup for F110 Payment run.
I have added the message types : REMADV for the basic type PEXR2002.
I also have added : PAYEXT for PEXR2002.
The Payment run generates the Idoc successfully. PAYEXE IDoc is generated.
I want to actually generate REMADV Idoc as per my functional requirement.
Question:
1. Whats the difference if Both are pointing to same Basic Type - PEXR2002 ?
2. What should I do to generate REMADV and Not PAYEXT?
3. Any configuration that decides the idoc type?
FYI - The payment method configured for all this is "E" - BACS Payment.
Any help would be appretiated.
PranaliHi ,
check this blog http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a00afa41-4254-2d10-74a5-bd560edf74da?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
IDOC Configuration steps for EDI
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV_CTR
Process code: REMC
Process
When an inbound Payment advice is received, it will create a payment and clearing AR document with the document type set up in the config below.
Config
Define posting rule in SPRO->FI->Bank accounting ->Business Transactions ->Payment transactions ->manual bank statement->define posting keys and posting rules
Assign company code to EDI payments in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Assign company codes for EDI payment advice notes.
Define Payment advice type 06 in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Define Further processing with account type D.
Prabhudas -
F110 payment run - split on invoice line item that exceed certain amount
Dear expert,
Now i want to ask is there any ways to configure F110 - payment run to auto checking on whenever the amount of one fi document is more than USD100,000 will auto split to second payment item.
*i have already tick individual pmnt on tcode FK02 - change vendor master data (at automatic payment transactions column). This method will split all fi document under same vendor post with different posting document number.
I would like to ask is there any way to configure auto split on the fi document (if the document is exceed some amount) for payment run.
thanks and appreciatei have put distribution amount.
Let say i put distribution amount USD100, after i run payment run, one account payable document will generate one payment document.
As what i want is- if the ap document is USD 200, then the payment document will generate two payment document.
Coz my enquiry is if the payment is excedd USD100 we need to assign to another tt payment as the TT is only accept maximum USD100 transfer.
Expert, please advice on ur view.
Thanks and appreciate much on ur previous help.
regards,
Ng Chong Chuan -
Dear All,
When I run f110 - payment run, does it always create a "Payment Document" ?
Thanks in advance for your quick reply/.
Best Regards
Vijay.Hi,
i think no one of your business partner has payment method
<b>W</b> in master data or in FI-Document - only <i>T</i>
you can also take more than 1 payment method (here: <b>TW</b>)
in your parameters of F110
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann -
F110 Issue:there is diff between of 1000usd in F110 payment list & dme file
H i experts
F110 Issue: there is difference between of 1000 usd in F110 payment list and Dme file.
please let me know reason
regards
sachinCheck the amount field in the DME as to which value it is picking. I think it is mapped incorrectly.
Ravi. -
Withholding tax calculation @ Customer payment
Hi
Experts, can any one help me on this issue??. I want to calculate and post withholding tax for a customer at the time of incoming payment(F-28). I have already activated extended withholding tax, defined tax type, tax code, & assigned in the customer master data. But system not calculating the tax nor its displaying tax code in the payment screen, & throwing a message when I double click on the relevant tax column ie " withholding tax information missing from line item" I f someone could throw a light on this, it would be a great help,
Thanks in advance
Hariharan.Kindly check
1. Define witholding tax type for invoice posting
IMG > Financial Account Global settings > Withholding tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Calculation > Withholding Tax type > <b>Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice posting</b>
2. Define witholding tax type for payment posting
IMG > Financial Account Global settings > Withholding tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Calculation > Withholding Tax type > <b>Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting</b>
and also check OBWW (Define account for w/h tax)
rgds. -
Deferred tax: Post down payment clearing individually $1 while f-4E3?
Hi all,
We are booking the invoice as well as clearing the special GL transaction through F-43/ F-41
001 39S 0009000457 PRADEEP SANGVIKAR 10,000.00-
002 40 6030000039 Testing Charges 9,066.00 SA
003 40 4040000067 Service Tax Credit( 907.00 SA
004 40 4040000069 EDN cess on ST cred 18.00 SA
005 40 4040000071 H&SECess on ST cred 9.00 SA
Hhere S (SPECIAL GL) is for staff advance
we are getting the error
Deferred tax: Post down payment clearing individually $1
Message no. DEFTAX023
kindly solve ?Hi,
Kindly refer to below SAP notes. Might be helpful.
Note 913805 - Error FF891 or DEFTAX025 when posting FI-Documents Version: 5
Thanks
Aravind -
Deferred tax: post down payment clearing individually $2 while f-44
Dear Experts:
We are trying to clearing the Special G/L transaction through T-code : F-44 but facing an error as Deferred tax: Post down payment clearing individually $2. Please find attached screen shot for your reference.
Would you please suggest me why I'm facing this error and how can I resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance and your prompt response is will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards.
Ripon Kumar PaulDear Dev:
Many thanks for your prompt reply. Already I've checked Sap Note 913805 and deleted all 4 BTEs mentioned there through T-code : FIBF but problem still exists. I'm facing the same problem.
Best Regards.
Ripon Kumar Paul
Maybe you are looking for
-
JLabel ImageIcon not opaque.
Hi I am having a little problem with my program that I am trying to develop. I have created a JFrame and instead of having the background the usual grey I have used an image. I then wanted to create some nice big buttons with nice smooth curved edges
-
Can I have more than one album art Image displayed on ipod per song?
Can someone help? My issue is that in itunes I can add more than one image (album art) to an individual song. While it's playing, in the display album art (bottom left corner) I can flick through all the images a particular song contains. I got exict
-
I've had my old O2 number transferred to my new iphone 4s on 3. my facetime and imessage show my transferred number but in the phone settings its still showing as the number that came with the phone. When i message someone it seems to be showing as e
-
Urgent ...JMS example client run problem
HI I am facing following error while running a simple JMS client. Please help. Regards Jaisinh D:\jai>java com.monex.prototype.SimpleTopicPublisher Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/AssertionError at weblogic.securi
-
Hi Does anyone had success using the HTML editor on a iPad ? I can only use the code view. Cheers Micah