Server CPU

I was wondering if it was normal in a school environment with about 30 computers for a server's CPU to spike at 100% and stay there untill restarted at which point the memmory usage than goes to 98%
xserver   Mac OS X (10.4)  

Whoa Barryc2, there are about 40 minutes between your posts... give people a chance to read and respond. Another good practice is to give as much detail about your situation as you can and the steps you have taken so far so people don't waste time suggesting things you've already done.
Some details that are necessary to begin to answer your question:
1) What Xserve model are you running?
2) What version of the of the OS are you running?
3) What services are you offering?
If you're trying to do 30 network home folders under 10.3 on a single processor Xserve with 256MB then I would expect 100% load. If you're running AFP for 30 users on a dual processor Xserve with 4GB under 10.4.8 then even 50% processor load would be unexpected.
Any runaway process can cause 100% processor use. ARD processes will occasionally do this and they can simply be killed off and the load can return to normal. Have you opened Activity Monitor and gotten the name of the process that is taking all the time? This is step 1. If it is so locked up you can't get through the UI try top over SSH to get the same information.
Once you find out exactly what process is actually taking the time the process the you can start to debug the problem. Some processes can simply be killed off and the problem will fix itself but others are more complicated. Checking the logs right before the processor maxed out can also be helpful - but this is easier if the problem is narrowed down a single process or service.
Hope this helps,
=Tod
G5/2.0x2, Dual XServes x2, XRAID, beige G3 501Mhz    

Similar Messages

  • Server CPU Usages - Critical

    We have a BC4J application developed using jdev 3.1/ front end is JSPs.
    The application is deployed using Oracle iAS 8i.
    The problem is that when in a jsp, a query is executed that has to return a large number of rows, then the cpu utilization of the database(oracle.exe) rises to 100 percent. The same query when run from sql, causes a memory consumption of only 20 percent.
    What can be the possible reasons for this huge increase in memory consumption when the query is fired using jdev data web beans from a jsp.
    amit

    Howard,
    because the CSS has a script language, you can basically do whatever you want.
    You could have a script running on the server to get the server cpu and save it into a file.
    Via the CSS script language, you could retrieve this value and decided to use or not the server.
    There is also something called DFP - dynamic feedback protocol. If your server vendor support this protocol you can use it to report server status to the CSS.
    Regards,
    Gilles.

  • Server CPU as Keepalive Parameter - Is it possible?

    Is there anyway for Keepalive to check the server CPU utilization as a way to determine if the service is dead or alive?
    Regards,
    Howard

    Howard,
    because the CSS has a script language, you can basically do whatever you want.
    You could have a script running on the server to get the server cpu and save it into a file.
    Via the CSS script language, you could retrieve this value and decided to use or not the server.
    There is also something called DFP - dynamic feedback protocol. If your server vendor support this protocol you can use it to report server status to the CSS.
    Regards,
    Gilles.

  • Application Server CPU at 100%

    We are running Oracle Forms and Reports 9.0.4 using OC4J on a Solaris 9 server. Environment responds quickly, except when an end user requests the generation of a large PDF report (with several hundred to over a thousand pages). Although query results are returned quickly by the database server, CPU on application server tops out at 100% for an hour or more while these large reports are being generated. During this hour or more, no other reports can be generated by other end users. Can the application server be configured to allow CPU and other resources to be shared during generation of large PDF reports? If so, how?

    >
    ... -Dlogfile=/vol04/applmgr/DEV/inst/apps/DEV_devas/logs/appl/conc/log/FNDOPP216337.txt ...
    >
    This looks to be the XML/BI Publisher process. Can you post relevant sections from this file ?
    Pl post EBS related questions in the EBS forums - http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=3
    HTH
    Srini

  • Skinny Msg Server CPU Peak

    Hi there,
    I have some problems in a Cisco UC540 with "Skinny Msg Server" having some CPU peaks. During peak all services are unavailable (calls, intermet access, etc. - this UC540 is our internet gateway):
      100                                              ********** ****
       90           **********                         ***************
       80           **********                         ***************
       70      ***************               *************************
       60      ***************               *************************
       50      ***************               *************************
       40      ***************               *************************
       30      ***************               *************************
       20      ********************     ******************************
       10 *************************     ******************************
         0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....6
                   0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0
                   CPU% per second (last 60 seconds)
      100 *        **           *
       90 *        **           *
       80 *        **           *
       70 #        **           *
       60 #  *     **           *
       50 #  *     **           *
       40 #  *     **           *        *                   *
       30 #  * ** *##     *     *    * ***  *  ***           * *
       20 #**#*****##** **** ***# **** *********** ********* ****** **
       10 ####*########*####*####*####*####*####*#*####*####*#*##*#*##
         0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....6
                   0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0
                   CPU% per minute (last 60 minutes)
                  * = maximum CPU%   # = average CPU%
      100 *                                             *                **
       90 *                                             *                **
       80 *                                             *                **
       70 *                  *                          *                *****  *
       60 *                  *            *             *                ****** **
       50 *     ***  *   *   *           ***            *               ******* **
       40 *     *** **   *   ** *        ***  *    **   **       ***    **********
    CPU utilization for five seconds: 72%/26%; one minute: 80%; five minutes: 59%
    PID Runtime(ms)     Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
    127     5803268    11898184        487 27.64% 43.85% 28.49%   0 Skinny Msg Serve
    352         356          55       6472  5.82%  0.46%  0.09%  67 SSH Process
    240      197724      327994        602  2.82%  0.43%  0.27%   0 Crypto IKMP
    118    45398476   121106202        374  2.74%  2.06%  2.38%   0 IP Input
       6     3598144      375574       9580  1.13%  0.33%  0.28%   0 Check heaps
      77       41396        8074       5127  1.05%  0.10%  0.02%   0 crypto engine pr
    What could be the problem? What can i do to avoid this problem?
    Thanks in advance for your support.
    Best regards,
    V

    Hi Paolo,
    First of all thanks for your reply.
    1) Version 15.1(2)T2
    2)
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    description $FW_OUTSIDE$
    ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
    ip access-group 102 in
    ip nat outside
    ip inspect SDM_MEDIUM out
    ip virtual-reassembly in
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    service-policy input sdmappfwp2p_SDM_MEDIUM
    end
    UC540#show ip access-lists 102
    Extended IP access list 102
         [...permits omitted...]
        140 deny ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
         [...permits omitted...]    
        200 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
        210 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any
        220 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
        230 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
        240 deny ip host 255.255.255.255 any
        250 deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any
        260 deny ip any any log (636 matches)
    The internal network is 192.168.100.0/24.
    Best regards,
    V

  • UCS Server CPU Allocation

    Dear Guys...
    As i am aware aabout UCS server and UCS system..
    one physicla cpu is equal to virtual cpu...
    but as i seen many application that having more that 6 cpu need i want to run on one UCS sever...how can adjust the cpu for them?
    As i have given the BOQ below, it is having 2 servers and 4 CPU but i need to isntall many application:
    CUCM
    CCUCN
    CCX
    WEBEX
    presence
    SO it takes around 5-6 cpu for installation...and also 1 cpu per vmware software also need...
    so that can you help me to correct for this issue and easy way to understand and configure the correct ucs server for my applications...?
    Thanks and Regard's
    Amit Sharma       

    Amit,
    Please start from here for running UC apps on UCS
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements
    HTH
    Padma

  • CSM - Load balance using Server CPU

    Hi
    I have a customer who requires the load-balancing prediction
    algorithm to be based on the CPU level of the Server. So the server with the least CPU is chosen at the laod-balancing stage.
    Is there a way to do this?
    Thanks James

    Hi James
    With CSM the only option is DFP (Dynamic feed back protocol). If your application vendor provides DFP agents (which is very unlikely) for the application then these agents can be installed on App servers for the desired purpose.
    Config details at
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/csm/4.2.x/configuration/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1039774')">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/csm/4.2.x/configuration/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1039774
    With ACE you can use SNMP based probes to achieve what you are looking for.
    Syed Iftekhar Ahmed

  • Oracle export process eating up 95-99% of server cpu

    Hi Everyone,
    I noticed that my export process is eating a huge amount of the server's cpu resources.
    Is there a way to control the resources allocated to my export process?
    thanks

    >Isn't that spinning and CPU usage ?
    Yes. No. Spinning on a latch means that the process is in wait state - waiting to access the resource. It means that every now and then, the process will check the resource state to determine if it can obtain access to it.
    Does "spinning" eat up CPU time? Typically not. And 99% of the time where is does, it is due to the type of shoddy "loop spinning" that I've demonstrated with the 1st sample piece of code above (called [url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busy_waiting]busy waiting).
    The norm is that a process in a wait state consumes very little CPU time. There are actual CPU instructions that tells the CPU to "ease off", like the [url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HLT]HLT instruction. This instruction is used at a higher level abstract(API) level - like with the DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP() API call.
    > CPU usage DOES convey information.
    You are missing the basic point that I was trying to make. In terms of performance measurement, it says nothing. It does not say GOOD. It does not say BAD.
    Why?
    An idle CPU can be a result of exceedingly poor performance caused by process serialisation (like in PL/SQL doing your own sequences by locking a table to do a SELECT MAX() to get next sequence number to use). Seen this one myself and most recently on a Superdome that showed idle CPU utilisation with the performance being excruciatingly slow.
    An idle CPU can be simply because of no work to be done.
    An idle CPU could be because of an I/O bottleneck as a 200 parallel query processes all hit the same I/O channels.. and then have to sit back and wait for the I/O calls to be completed. Saw this one often on Oracle Parallel Server (OPS) many years ago.
    Similar situation for a heavily utilised CPU. The actual utilisation figure does not tell you how much of that CPU time used, is used effectively by optimally designed and coded processes.. and how must is wasted by poorly design and coded processes.
    From a performance perspective, it alone says nothing.
    And this is what the OP says - he's seeing 95+% CPU utilisation when running an export. Is it a performance problem? If so, what can he do about it?
    The answer to which is, identify if there is an actual performance problem as 95% CPU utilisation alone does not tell us whether that is good and efficient usage of CPU time, or abuse and wasted use of CPU time.

  • Server CPU usage spikes from networked acoounts

    Hello all,
    I work for a school district and we have recently switched the majority of our users to log in via network accounts (rather than mobile). At random times, the CPU on the server will spike to 100% usage and sometimes stays there for an hour or more. Running 'fs_usage' on the server reveals that certain files and/or dirs are getting hung. The main culprits seem to be Firefox v15 profiles, the AddressBook folder under Application Support, and Microsoft Office 2011 files. I'm wondering if anyone has seen these issues before, or know of something that could be done to alleviate the issue. Most of our clients are running Mac OS X 10.7.4. Our servers run Leopard. It also may be worth noting that many of the people logging in are doing so on laptops (macbook airs).
    Thanks.

    Hello all,
    I work for a school district and we have recently switched the majority of our users to log in via network accounts (rather than mobile). At random times, the CPU on the server will spike to 100% usage and sometimes stays there for an hour or more. Running 'fs_usage' on the server reveals that certain files and/or dirs are getting hung. The main culprits seem to be Firefox v15 profiles, the AddressBook folder under Application Support, and Microsoft Office 2011 files. I'm wondering if anyone has seen these issues before, or know of something that could be done to alleviate the issue. Most of our clients are running Mac OS X 10.7.4. Our servers run Leopard. It also may be worth noting that many of the people logging in are doing so on laptops (macbook airs).
    Thanks.

  • Java Process Consuming 100% of Server CPU

    Hi,
    We have a new instance of CQ5 (version 5.4) running on a Windows 2003 SP2 Server. For some reason, which we can't determine, after a period of time a Java process on the system begins to consume 100% of the CPU and the system becomes totally unresponsive. Has anyone seen this before? Is there a fix for this?
    RK         

    Does the it eventually recover on it's own? It's possible that the JVM is doing full garbage collection.  How big is your max heap size?  I suggest to add some garbage collection debugging in the JVM_OPTS to see if it is Java's garbage collection or not.  Might as well check the heap too, to see if it's running our of memory.
    Example;
    -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution -Xloggc:/tmp/gc.log -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/tmp
    Ron

  • After migration Exchange 2013, MBX server, CPU utilization is so high

    CPU utilization become so high this morning after migration into Exchange 2013,
    Some healthy DBs is getting disccounetced with growing replay Queue length, mounted DB is no issue.
    It seems that's short of CPU performance,
    Are there any processes to limit or set up to reduce the load of CPU, MBX servers? It's temporary treatment...

    What's the CU level you have for your Exchange 2013? Also, please check node runner processor as Node Runner process can cause CPU utilization issue. I would also suggest to check your disk IOPs as it looks like disk IOPs issue to me as well. Thanks.
    Regards, Riaz Javed Butt | Consultant Microsoft Professional Services MCITP, MCITP (Exchange), MCSE: Messaging, MCITP Office 365 | mstechtalk.com

  • Flash Media Server 3.5/number of CPU

    How many number of CPU cores Flash Media Server 3.5 supports?

    Hi,
    You could refer to the EULA located at the FMS install directory/License.htm.
    So in short to install FMSS you could use up to 4 CPUs and to install FMIS you are allowed to use upto 8 CPUs.
    The section 2.8.5 states:
    2.8.5.         License Limit.  Licensee shall only use the Software corresponding to the licenses for the Software that Licensee has purchased.  Licensee is permitted to install the Streaming Server on a single Computer or Virtual Server containing up to 4 CPUs. Licensee is permitted to install the Interactive Server on a single Computer or Virtual Server containing up to 8 CPUs.  In the event that Virtual Servers are installed on a Computer, each such Virtual Server shall be deemed to operate the Software on 2 CPUs (each, a “Virtual Server CPU”), and the total number of Virtual Server CPUs plus the total number of physical CPUs on such Computer, shall be counted together for the purpose of applying the limitations set forth in this Agreement. For all the Software licensed hereunder, if Licensee exceeds the limitations set forth herein on a single Computer or Virtual Server Licensee must purchase another license to the Software, and such additional license shall permit up to permitted number of additional CPUs (including Virtual Server CPUs) in such Computer or Virtual Server.
    Thanks
    Mamata

  • Increase Performance and ROI for SQL Server Environments

    May 2015
    Explore
    The Buzz from Microsoft Ignite 2015
    NetApp was in full force at the recent Microsoft Ignite show in Chicago, talking about solutions for hybrid cloud, and our proven solutions for Microsoft SQL Server and other Microsoft applications.
    Hot topics at the NetApp booth included:
    OnCommand® Shift. A revolutionary technology that lets you move virtual machines back and forth between VMware and Hyper-V environments in minutes.
    Azure Site Recovery to NetApp Private Storage. Replicate on-premises SAN-based applications to NPS for disaster recovery in the Azure cloud.
    These tools give you greater flexibility for managing and protecting important business applications.
    Chris Lemmons
    Director, EIS Technical Marketing, NetApp
    If your organization runs databases such as Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle DB, you probably know that these vendors primarily license their products on a "per-core" basis. Microsoft recently switched to "per-core" rather than "per-socket" licensing for SQL Server 2012 and 2014. This change can have a big impact on the total cost of operating a database, especially as core counts on new servers continue to climb. It turns out that the right storage infrastructure can drive down database costs, increase productivity, and put your infrastructure back in balance.
    In many customer environments, NetApp has noticed that server CPU utilization is low—often on the order of just 20%. This is usually the result of I/O bottlenecks. Server cores have to sit and wait for I/O from hard disk drives (HDDs). We've been closely studying the impact of all-flash storage on SQL Server environments that use HDD-based storage systems. NetApp® All Flash FAS platform delivers world-class performance for SQL Server plus the storage efficiency, application integration, nondisruptive operations, and data protection of clustered Data ONTAP®, making it ideal for SQL Server environments.
    Tests show that All Flash FAS can drive up IOPS and database server CPU utilization by as much as 4x. And with a 95% reduction in latency, you can achieve this level of performance with half as many servers. This reduces the number of servers you need and the number of cores you have to license, driving down costs by 50% or more and paying back your investment in flash in as little as six months.
    Figure 1) NetApp All Flash FAS increases CPU utilization on your SQL Server database servers, lowering costs.
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    Whether you're running one of the newer versions of SQL Server or facing an upgrade of an earlier version, you can't afford not to take a second look at your storage environment.
    End of Support for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 is Rapidly Approaching
    Microsoft has set the end of extended support for SQL Server 2005 for April 2016—less than a year away. With support for Microsoft Windows 2003 ending in July 2015, time may already be running short.
    If you're running Windows Server 2003, new server hardware is almost certainly needed when you upgrade SQL Server. Evaluate your server and storage options now to get costs under control.
    Test Methodology
    To test the impact of flash on SQL Server performance, we replaced a legacy HDD-based storage system with an All Flash FAS AFF8080 EX. The legacy system was configured with almost 150 HDDs, a typical configuration for HDD storage supporting SQL Server. The AFF8080 EX used just 48 SSDs.
    Table 1) Components used in testing.
    Test Configuration Components
    Details
    SQL Server 2014 servers
    Fujitsu RX300
    Server operating system
    Microsoft Windows 2012 R2 Standard Edition
    SQL Server database version
    Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition
    Processors per server
    2 6-core Xeon E5-2630 at 2.30 GHz
    Fibre channel network
    8Gb FC with multipathing
    Storage controller
    AFF8080 EX
    Data ONTAP version
    Clustered Data ONTAP® 8.3.1
    Drive number and type
    48 SSD
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    The test configuration consisted of 10 database servers connected through fibre channel to both the legacy storage system and the AFF8080 EX. Each of the 10 servers ran SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition.
    The publicly available HammerDB workload generator was used to drive an OLTP-like workload simultaneously from each of the 10 database servers to storage. We first directed the workload to the legacy storage array to establish a baseline, increasing the load to the point where read latency consistently exceeded 20ms.
    That workload was then directed at the AFF8080 EX. The change in storage resulted in an overall 20x reduction in read latency, a greater than 4x improvement in IOPS, and a greater than 4x improvement in database server CPU utilization.
    Figure 2) NetApp All Flash FAS increases IOPS and server CPU utilization and lowers latency.
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    In other words, the database servers are able to process four times as many IOPS with dramatically lower latency. CPU utilization goes up accordingly because the servers are processing 4x the work per unit time.
    The All Flash FAS system still had additional headroom under this load.
    Calculating the Savings
    Let's look at what this performance improvement means for the total cost of running SQL Server 2014 over a 3-year period. To do the analysis we used NetApp Realize, a storage modeling and financial analysis tool designed to help quantify the value of NetApp solutions and products. NetApp sales teams and partners use this tool to assist with return on investment (ROI) calculations.
    The calculation includes the cost of the AFF8080 EX, eliminates the costs associated with the existing storage system, and cuts the total number of database servers from 10 to five. This reduces SQL Server licensing costs by 50%. The same workload was run with five servers and achieved the same results. ROI analysis is summarized in Table 2.
    Table 2) ROI from replacing an HDD-based storage system with All Flash FAS, thereby cutting server and licensing costs in half.
    Value
    Analysis Results
    ROI
    65%
    Net present value (NPV)
    $950,000
    Payback period
    six months
    Total cost reduction
    More than $1 million saved over a 3-year analysis period compared to the legacy storage system
    Savings on power, space, and administration
    $40,000
    Additional savings due to nondisruptive operations benefits (not included in ROI)
    $90,000
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    The takeaway here is that you can replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs, with the majority of the savings derived from the reduction in SQL Server licensing costs.
    Replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs.
    Maximum SQL Server 2014 Performance
    In addition to the ROI analysis, we also measured the maximum performance of the AFF8080 EX with SQL Server 2014. A load-generation tool was used to simulate an industry-standard TPC-E OLTP workload against an SQL Server 2014 test configuration.
    A two-node AFF8080 EX achieved a maximum throughput of 322K IOPS at just over 1ms latency. For all points other than the maximum load point, latency was consistently under 1ms and remained under 0.8ms up to 180K IOPS.
    Data Reduction and Storage Efficiency
    In addition to performance testing, we looked at the overall storage efficiency savings of our SQL Server database implementation. The degree of compression that can be achieved is dependent on the actual data that is written and stored in the database. For this environment, inline compression was effective. Deduplication, as is often the case in database environments, provided little additional storage savings and was not enabled.
    For the test data used in the maximum performance test, we measured a compression ratio of 1.5:1. We also tested inline compression on a production SQL Server 2014 data set to further validate these results and saw a 1.8:1 compression ratio.
    Space-efficient NetApp Snapshot® copies provide additional storage efficiency benefits for database environments. Unlike snapshot methods that use copy-on-write, there is no performance penalty; unlike full mirror copies, NetApp Snapshot copies use storage space sparingly. Snapshot copies only consume a small amount of storage space for metadata and additional incremental space is consumed as block-level changes occur. In a typical real-world SQL Server deployment on NetApp storage, database volume Snapshot copies are made every two hours.
    First introduced more than 10 years ago, NetApp FlexClone® technology also plays an important role in SQL Server environments. Clones are fully writable, and, similar to Snapshot copies, only consume incremental storage capacity. With FlexClone, you can create as many copies of production data as you need for development and test, reporting, and so on. Cloning is a great way to support the development and test work needed when upgrading from an earlier version of SQL Server. You'll sometimes see these types of capabilities referred to as "copy data management."
    A Better Way to Run Enterprise Applications
    The performance benefits that all-flash storage can deliver for database environments are significant: more IOPS, lower latency, and an end to near-constant performance tuning.
    If you think the performance acceleration that comes with all-flash storage is cost prohibitive, think again. All Flash FAS doesn't just deliver a performance boost, it changes the economics of your operations, paying for itself with thousands in savings on licensing and server costs. In terms of dollars per IOPS, All Flash FAS is extremely economical relative to HDD.
    And, because All Flash FAS runs NetApp clustered Data ONTAP, it delivers the most complete environment to support SQL Server and all your enterprise applications with capabilities that include comprehensive storage efficiency, integrated data protection, and deep integration for your applications.
    For complete details on this testing look for NetApp TR-4303, which will be available in a few weeks. Stay tuned to Tech OnTap for more information as NetApp continues to run benchmarks with important server workloads including Oracle DB and server virtualization.
    Learn more about NetApp solutions for SQL Server and NetApp All-flash solutions.
    Quick Links
    Tech OnTap Community
    Archive
    PDF

    May 2015
    Explore
    The Buzz from Microsoft Ignite 2015
    NetApp was in full force at the recent Microsoft Ignite show in Chicago, talking about solutions for hybrid cloud, and our proven solutions for Microsoft SQL Server and other Microsoft applications.
    Hot topics at the NetApp booth included:
    OnCommand® Shift. A revolutionary technology that lets you move virtual machines back and forth between VMware and Hyper-V environments in minutes.
    Azure Site Recovery to NetApp Private Storage. Replicate on-premises SAN-based applications to NPS for disaster recovery in the Azure cloud.
    These tools give you greater flexibility for managing and protecting important business applications.
    Chris Lemmons
    Director, EIS Technical Marketing, NetApp
    If your organization runs databases such as Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle DB, you probably know that these vendors primarily license their products on a "per-core" basis. Microsoft recently switched to "per-core" rather than "per-socket" licensing for SQL Server 2012 and 2014. This change can have a big impact on the total cost of operating a database, especially as core counts on new servers continue to climb. It turns out that the right storage infrastructure can drive down database costs, increase productivity, and put your infrastructure back in balance.
    In many customer environments, NetApp has noticed that server CPU utilization is low—often on the order of just 20%. This is usually the result of I/O bottlenecks. Server cores have to sit and wait for I/O from hard disk drives (HDDs). We've been closely studying the impact of all-flash storage on SQL Server environments that use HDD-based storage systems. NetApp® All Flash FAS platform delivers world-class performance for SQL Server plus the storage efficiency, application integration, nondisruptive operations, and data protection of clustered Data ONTAP®, making it ideal for SQL Server environments.
    Tests show that All Flash FAS can drive up IOPS and database server CPU utilization by as much as 4x. And with a 95% reduction in latency, you can achieve this level of performance with half as many servers. This reduces the number of servers you need and the number of cores you have to license, driving down costs by 50% or more and paying back your investment in flash in as little as six months.
    Figure 1) NetApp All Flash FAS increases CPU utilization on your SQL Server database servers, lowering costs.
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    Whether you're running one of the newer versions of SQL Server or facing an upgrade of an earlier version, you can't afford not to take a second look at your storage environment.
    End of Support for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 is Rapidly Approaching
    Microsoft has set the end of extended support for SQL Server 2005 for April 2016—less than a year away. With support for Microsoft Windows 2003 ending in July 2015, time may already be running short.
    If you're running Windows Server 2003, new server hardware is almost certainly needed when you upgrade SQL Server. Evaluate your server and storage options now to get costs under control.
    Test Methodology
    To test the impact of flash on SQL Server performance, we replaced a legacy HDD-based storage system with an All Flash FAS AFF8080 EX. The legacy system was configured with almost 150 HDDs, a typical configuration for HDD storage supporting SQL Server. The AFF8080 EX used just 48 SSDs.
    Table 1) Components used in testing.
    Test Configuration Components
    Details
    SQL Server 2014 servers
    Fujitsu RX300
    Server operating system
    Microsoft Windows 2012 R2 Standard Edition
    SQL Server database version
    Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition
    Processors per server
    2 6-core Xeon E5-2630 at 2.30 GHz
    Fibre channel network
    8Gb FC with multipathing
    Storage controller
    AFF8080 EX
    Data ONTAP version
    Clustered Data ONTAP® 8.3.1
    Drive number and type
    48 SSD
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    The test configuration consisted of 10 database servers connected through fibre channel to both the legacy storage system and the AFF8080 EX. Each of the 10 servers ran SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition.
    The publicly available HammerDB workload generator was used to drive an OLTP-like workload simultaneously from each of the 10 database servers to storage. We first directed the workload to the legacy storage array to establish a baseline, increasing the load to the point where read latency consistently exceeded 20ms.
    That workload was then directed at the AFF8080 EX. The change in storage resulted in an overall 20x reduction in read latency, a greater than 4x improvement in IOPS, and a greater than 4x improvement in database server CPU utilization.
    Figure 2) NetApp All Flash FAS increases IOPS and server CPU utilization and lowers latency.
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    In other words, the database servers are able to process four times as many IOPS with dramatically lower latency. CPU utilization goes up accordingly because the servers are processing 4x the work per unit time.
    The All Flash FAS system still had additional headroom under this load.
    Calculating the Savings
    Let's look at what this performance improvement means for the total cost of running SQL Server 2014 over a 3-year period. To do the analysis we used NetApp Realize, a storage modeling and financial analysis tool designed to help quantify the value of NetApp solutions and products. NetApp sales teams and partners use this tool to assist with return on investment (ROI) calculations.
    The calculation includes the cost of the AFF8080 EX, eliminates the costs associated with the existing storage system, and cuts the total number of database servers from 10 to five. This reduces SQL Server licensing costs by 50%. The same workload was run with five servers and achieved the same results. ROI analysis is summarized in Table 2.
    Table 2) ROI from replacing an HDD-based storage system with All Flash FAS, thereby cutting server and licensing costs in half.
    Value
    Analysis Results
    ROI
    65%
    Net present value (NPV)
    $950,000
    Payback period
    six months
    Total cost reduction
    More than $1 million saved over a 3-year analysis period compared to the legacy storage system
    Savings on power, space, and administration
    $40,000
    Additional savings due to nondisruptive operations benefits (not included in ROI)
    $90,000
    Source: NetApp, 2015
    The takeaway here is that you can replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs, with the majority of the savings derived from the reduction in SQL Server licensing costs.
    Replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs.
    Maximum SQL Server 2014 Performance
    In addition to the ROI analysis, we also measured the maximum performance of the AFF8080 EX with SQL Server 2014. A load-generation tool was used to simulate an industry-standard TPC-E OLTP workload against an SQL Server 2014 test configuration.
    A two-node AFF8080 EX achieved a maximum throughput of 322K IOPS at just over 1ms latency. For all points other than the maximum load point, latency was consistently under 1ms and remained under 0.8ms up to 180K IOPS.
    Data Reduction and Storage Efficiency
    In addition to performance testing, we looked at the overall storage efficiency savings of our SQL Server database implementation. The degree of compression that can be achieved is dependent on the actual data that is written and stored in the database. For this environment, inline compression was effective. Deduplication, as is often the case in database environments, provided little additional storage savings and was not enabled.
    For the test data used in the maximum performance test, we measured a compression ratio of 1.5:1. We also tested inline compression on a production SQL Server 2014 data set to further validate these results and saw a 1.8:1 compression ratio.
    Space-efficient NetApp Snapshot® copies provide additional storage efficiency benefits for database environments. Unlike snapshot methods that use copy-on-write, there is no performance penalty; unlike full mirror copies, NetApp Snapshot copies use storage space sparingly. Snapshot copies only consume a small amount of storage space for metadata and additional incremental space is consumed as block-level changes occur. In a typical real-world SQL Server deployment on NetApp storage, database volume Snapshot copies are made every two hours.
    First introduced more than 10 years ago, NetApp FlexClone® technology also plays an important role in SQL Server environments. Clones are fully writable, and, similar to Snapshot copies, only consume incremental storage capacity. With FlexClone, you can create as many copies of production data as you need for development and test, reporting, and so on. Cloning is a great way to support the development and test work needed when upgrading from an earlier version of SQL Server. You'll sometimes see these types of capabilities referred to as "copy data management."
    A Better Way to Run Enterprise Applications
    The performance benefits that all-flash storage can deliver for database environments are significant: more IOPS, lower latency, and an end to near-constant performance tuning.
    If you think the performance acceleration that comes with all-flash storage is cost prohibitive, think again. All Flash FAS doesn't just deliver a performance boost, it changes the economics of your operations, paying for itself with thousands in savings on licensing and server costs. In terms of dollars per IOPS, All Flash FAS is extremely economical relative to HDD.
    And, because All Flash FAS runs NetApp clustered Data ONTAP, it delivers the most complete environment to support SQL Server and all your enterprise applications with capabilities that include comprehensive storage efficiency, integrated data protection, and deep integration for your applications.
    For complete details on this testing look for NetApp TR-4303, which will be available in a few weeks. Stay tuned to Tech OnTap for more information as NetApp continues to run benchmarks with important server workloads including Oracle DB and server virtualization.
    Learn more about NetApp solutions for SQL Server and NetApp All-flash solutions.
    Quick Links
    Tech OnTap Community
    Archive
    PDF

  • How many cpus on server are allocated to client

    hello,
    its not an issue rather doubt which is hunting me from last 2-3 days.
    My 10gR2 Oracle database running on
    Widows server 2008 R2 Enterprise
    Processor ----> intel Xeon cpu [email protected] GHz (4 processor)
    RAM------>8GB
    its a dedicated server.
    Actually i was going through the AWR report whn one of the client came to me with slow database performance during some time interval.
    when i had a look at the Top 5 Timed Events in Report it showed me the
    Sql*net message from client      834.35si told them to run their query so that i can have trace of that.
    then time event showed me something nearer to above and our database was taking only 15 sec to carry out the task.
    i told them that
    "you application/client is taking 834 sec to tell our database to do something.But once the database got your application's request to carry out something, the database is taking only 15 sec to provide you with the result"
    so they asked me to justify that the problem is with application side/machine side.
    After digging in a lot on the internet ground, chatting with my colleges on cell phone and running through many threads specially Asktom.oracle.com, i got really confused.
    They came up with varied opinions which kept me thinking again & again over the same thing.
    In one of his(Thomas kyte) thread the discussion was as follows.
    The output of tkprof when the developers run the same program on their PC shows a big difference in
    SQL*Net message from client.
    The SQL*Net message from client from my tkprof is almost 4-5 times theirs.
    Could you please advise what might be the cause of that?
    Thanks
    Followup   August 25, 2009 - 9am Central time zone:
    that could mean.....
    your machine is slow (their desktop cpus blow your server cpus away) as much as anything.
    since their code is not instrumented, try SQL*Net trace (with TIMESTAMPS) can be helpful to check out the time in the network between the client and server. See Note 16658.1 - see if you experience radically different response times on the various machines.
    4 stars   August 25, 2009 - 2pm Central time zone
    Bookmark | Bottom | Top
    Reviewer: Jaklin Ekdawi
    My Database server is T5120 with 4 core 1.2 GHz Ultra SPARC T2 processor (from O/S it is seen as 32
    CPU * 1.2 GHz).
    Their PC has 2 CPU * 4 Ghz.
    Based on the above, How come their PC is more powerful than my server?
    The ASH Report for the execution period of the program shows ¿CPU + Wait for CPU¿ is the top event,
    however, tkprof shows ¿SQL*Net from client¿ is the top event waited on.
    Top User Events
    Event        Event Class    % Activity    Avg Active Sessions
    CPU + Wait for CPU     CPU             81.66        0.14
    log file sync             Commit             5.92        0.01
    db file scattered read     User I/O     2.37        0.00
    Can you please explain why there is a difference between tkprof and ASH report?
    Thank You
    Followup   August 25, 2009 - 8pm Central time zone:
    I only care about a single cpu, your client program is not using more than one.
    I often downloaded stuff from my big bad sparc to my desktop because my desktop was many times faster than the sparc.
    look further down in the ash report - sqlnet message from client is an idle wait, we tend to ignore it as it is the time we spent WAITING FOR THE CLIENT.
    Their pc looks a lot faster than your server since you are only using a single cpu - your client is not multi-process. It only uses a single cpu.
    4 stars   August 25, 2009 - 2pm Central time zone
    Bookmark | Bottom | Top
    Reviewer: Jaklin Ekdawi
    Sorry, I forgot to say that during the execution time the cpu on the server was 98-99% idle based
    on (using top and sar).
    Thanks
    Followup   August 25, 2009 - 8pm Central time zone:
    I agree, because you could not use 31 out of 32 cpus, I would expect it to be almost idle.
    97% idle would mean a single cpu was 100% used. So, it sounds like you were using almost 100% of that single cpu you had access to.
    and it isn't as fast as their pc.
    4 stars   August 25, 2009 - 10pm Central time zone
    Bookmark | Bottom | Top
    Reviewer: Jaklin Ekdawi
    The tkprof from the developer's PC is below
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse      122      0.39       0.68          0        403          0           0
    Execute    122      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch      396      0.09       0.11          0      25354          0         274
    total      640      0.48       0.80          0      25757          0         274
    Misses in library cache during parse: 122
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                     763        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                   763       14.71        312.91
      SQL*Net more data to client                   122        0.00          0.00
    The tkprof for the running the same process on Solaris DB Server
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse      124      0.06       0.03          0          0          0           0
    Execute    124      0.04       0.01          0          0          0           0
    Fetch      400      0.07       0.10          0        802          0         276
    total      648      0.17       0.15          0        802          0         276
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                     774        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                   774       43.65        964.23
    - On Solaris DB server, the CPU is 0.17, however, "SQL*Net message from client" is 964.23.
    - On the developer¿s PC, the CPU is 0.48, however, "SQL*Net message from client" is 312.91.
    Based on that, how I can approve it is CPU issue?
    Followup   August 26, 2009 - 7pm Central time zone:
    how about this.
    have the developers write something that mimics what they do without the database in it. Same sorts of loops and processing they do in the code in the client.
    run it on their machine
    run it on yours
    You'll find your big bad server has cpu's that are extremely slow compared to the desktop machine.
    Hence - the time spent waiting for sqlnet message from client is - time spent in YOUR client on YOUR server processing the data returned from the database.
    saying "the cpu 0.17 on one and 0.48 on the other" is meaningless, they are completely different cpus with completely different performance characteristics.
    And that you have 32 of them - no use to you, you use one..
    It looks like your server is about 2-3 times slower then their test machine.
    5 stars SQL*Net Message from client may not be an issue from the app   May 28, 2010 - 8am Central time zone
    Bookmark | Bottom | Top
    Reviewer: Thierry B from Paris, France
    Hi,
    I just read your post as I experienced the exact same problem. I found something that fixed this
    problem for me, my sqlnet.ora contained that line after an oracle upgrade:
    TRACE_LEVEL_CLIENT=16
    I don't know how it came there. But it was the cause of my problem (too long idle time). I simply
    removed it and no more wait events.
    I hope it can be of any help for anyone.
    Followup   May 28, 2010 - 8am Central time zone:
    that is a client side issue though, isn't it. It is an application side issue, not a database side issue.
    5 stars   April 15, 2011 - 10am Central time zone
    Bookmark | Bottom | Top
    Reviewer: A reader in this thread Tom insisted that the client has access to only 1 CPU on the server even though the questioner told him that his machine is having around 32 CPU'S.
    so this thread was the source of my confusion.
    i kept asking myself "if the client application has access to one cpu out of 32 cpu's on the server on which the database server is running,then What is the use of multiprocessor? my oracle/client application has access to only one cpu on the server(like Tom said), what other 31 cpu's on the server machine are upto?if one cpu is getting exhausted by the client Application request, then what the other processor are doing ? are they not meant for load balancing?"
    when i had a chat on cell phone with my colleagues regarding the oracle access to the cpu's on the server, then they told me that if there are more number of cpu's then the the response time would be fast cause workload is divided among the multiple processor to carry out the task in parallel.
    Again i got confused with the deferring opinion..
    so just want to have clarification on
    * how many processes do i have access to on server machine where my oracle is installed?*
    how many processes do the client applicaiton S/W/client machine have access to out of 32 processors?
    is workload devided among the cpus on the server ,in case of huge request from the client application?
    thanks & i hope my doubt would be cleared

    Look at it in basic terms (forgetting for the moment about Oracle and SQL*Net and specific s/w itself).
    A process is loaded into memory. This process contains machine code instructions. How many CPUs can execute these instructions?
    Only 1.
    Simplistically. The process has a single execution pointer and set of CPU registers. A single CPU executes the instruction (as indicated by the execution pointer). The registers are used and updated.
    The same CPU may not be used each time around. So a single process can during its lifetime, be executed by a number of CPUs. But a single CPU at a time.
    A process can thread. This basically means that a second copy of the execution pointer and registers set are created. Each such copy will be executed by by a single CPU at a time.
    An Oracle client is serviced by an Oracle server process (either dedicated or shared). On Linux/Unix systems, this will be a unique physical process. On Windows, it will be a unique thread.
    This process is executed by a single CPU. Thus that client is serviced by a single CPU.
    This changes when Oracle can use parallel processing and there are PX slave processes available. In that case, the client is serviced by a single process - but that process has in turn enlisted the assistance of helper processes. Thus the client is now serviced by multiple processes (or threads on Windows) and thus by multiple CPUs.
    However, it is not that simple either. It is "cheaper" for the kernel to run threads on the same CPU than on different CPUs. The reason is the same memory is used by both and access to that memory by different CPUs is more complex (and thus more expensive and slower) than from the same CPU.
    So depending on a number of factors, that client may still be serviced by a single CPU despite the fact that PX slaves are used. And from a client process perspective, this does not really matter. The crux of the issue in this regard is the CPU utilisation/footprint of that client process on the server.
    If the clock time for a client process says "+running for 60s+" and the server says "+CPU time is 10s+", you cannot say that the process was not serviced by multiple CPUs. You do not know whether than 10s CPU time was for 5 processes each spending 2s to service that client.
    However, when the server says "+CPU time is 70s+" - a longer period that the wall clock time of the client, then it is reasonable to assume that multiple server processes (and thus CPUs) are servicing that client process.
    As for exactly how many CPUs are in fact used by the server? That has no real bearing on this. It does not change client-server behaviour.
    Even Oracle does not know and does not care which CPU is servicing it. The correct piece of s/w to deal with that, is the kernel. Yes, you can bind a thread or process to a specific server CPU, but the reasons for this is quite technical and is always an exception. Let the kernel deal with which CPU to use. It is of no concern to the server s/w (like Oracle), and even less to the client process being serviced by that server s/w.

  • SQL Server 2005 SP2 install on Vista

    Hi,
    I have all updates for Vista, tried to install SQL Server 2005 SP2, the following log file:
    Microsoft SQL Server 2005 9.00.3042.00
    ==============================
    OS Version      : Professional  (Build 6000)
    Time            : Wed Mar 26 12:20:54 2008
    USER-PC : To change an existing instance of Microsoft SQL Server 2005 to a different edition of SQL Server 2005, you must run SQL Server 2005 Setup from the command prompt and include the SKUUPGRADE=1 parameter.
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)
    Product Version : 9.00.3042.00
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SQLSupport_1.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client
    Product Version : 9.00.3042.00
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SQLNCLI_1.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer
    Product Version : 9.00.3042.00
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SqlWriter_1.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)
    Product Version : 9.00.3042.00
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SQLSupport_2.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client
    Product Version : 9.00.3042.00
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SQLNCLI_2.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition
    Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_SQL.log
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Workstation Components, Books Online and Development Tools
    Warning         : Warning 28123.Warning: SQL Server Setup cannot install this feature because a different edition of this feature is already installed. For more information, see 'Version and Edition Upgrades' in SQL Server Books Online.
    Machine         : USER-PC
    Product         : Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools Express Edition
    Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
    Install         : Successful
    Log File        : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Files\SQLSetup0002_USER-PC_Tools.log
     Setup succeeded with the installation, inspect the log file completely for status on all the components.
    Time            : Wed Mar 26 12:23:51 2008
    ==============================================================
    When I try to start SQL Server it times out. SQL Server Express is running ok.
    Can you help me get this started?
    Thank you,
    Lucy

    This is the previous errorlog:
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3054.00 (Intel X86)
     Mar 23 2007 16:28:52
     Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
     Enterprise Evaluation Edition on Windows NT 6.0 (Build 6000: )
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      (c) 2005 Microsoft Corporation.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      All rights reserved.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      Server process ID is 240.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      Authentication mode is WINDOWS-ONLY.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      Logging SQL Server messages in file 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\LOG\ERRORLOG'.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      This instance of SQL Server last reported using a process ID of 4180 at 4/5/2008 11:17:36 AM (local) 4/5/2008 6:17:36 PM (UTC). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server      Registry startup parameters:
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server        -d C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\DATA\master.mdf
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server        -e C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\LOG\ERRORLOG
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.27 Server        -l C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\DATA\mastlog.ldf
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.32 Server      SQL Server is starting at normal priority base (=7). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.32 Server      Detected 2 CPUs. This is an informational message; no user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.50 Server      Using dynamic lock allocation.  Initial allocation of 2500 Lock blocks and 5000 Lock Owner blocks per node.  This is an informational message only.  No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.55 Server      Attempting to initialize Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.64 Server      The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC) service could not be contacted.  If you would like distributed transaction functionality, please start this service.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.64 Server      Database mirroring has been enabled on this instance of SQL Server.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.64 spid4s      Starting up database 'master'.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.80 spid4s      4 transactions rolled forward in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.82 spid4s      0 transactions rolled back in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:06.82 spid4s      Recovery is writing a checkpoint in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.06 spid4s      SQL Trace ID 1 was started by login "sa".
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.10 spid4s      Starting up database 'mssqlsystemresource'.
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.13 spid4s      The resource database build version is 9.00.3042. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.34 spid4s      Server name is 'USER-PC'. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.34 spid9s      Starting up database 'model'.
    2008-04-09 11:47:07.53 spid9s      Clearing tempdb database.
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.11 Server      A self-generated certificate was successfully loaded for encryption.
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.11 Server      Server is listening on [ 'any' <ipv6> 1433].
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.11 Server      Server is listening on [ 'any' <ipv4> 1433].
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.17 Server      Server local connection provider is ready to accept connection on [ \\.\pipe\SQLLocal\MSSQLSERVER ].
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.17 Server      Server named pipe provider is ready to accept connection on [ \\.\pipe\sql\query ].
    2008-04-09 11:47:08.17 Server      Server is listening on [ ::1 <ipv6> 1434].
    2008-04-09 11:47:09.12 spid9s      Starting up database 'tempdb'.
    2008-04-09 11:47:09.47 spid12s     The Service Broker protocol transport is disabled or not configured.
    2008-04-09 11:47:09.47 spid12s     The Database Mirroring protocol transport is disabled or not configured.
    2008-04-09 11:47:09.53 spid12s     Service Broker manager has started.
    2008-04-09 11:51:06.92 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 1662000 to 199683 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 11:55:07.29 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 11:55:07.29 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 199683 to 136029 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 12:23:09.84 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 136029 to 586928 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 12:59:13.12 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 13:07:13.85 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 586928 to 824822 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 13:47:17.50 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 824822 to 140502 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 14:07:19.33 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 15:07:24.80 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 15:11:25.16 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 140502 to 1413355 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 15:15:25.53 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 1413355 to 161989 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 15:19:25.89 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 161989 to 134822 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 16:23:31.73 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 17:23:37.20 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 18:11:41.58 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 134822 to 154257 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 18:23:42.67 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 18:23:42.67 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 154257 to 134721 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 18:35:43.79 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 134721 to 151448 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 18:43:44.51 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 151448 to 125134 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 19:15:47.35 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 125134 to 182297 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 19:23:48.08 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 19:27:48.45 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 182297 to 120770 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 19:47:50.27 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 120770 to 1370171 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 20:07:52.10 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 1370171 to 106932 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 20:23:53.56 Server      The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 1 is not synchronized with other CPUs.
    2008-04-09 20:35:54.65 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 106932 to 88924 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 20:51:56.11 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 88924 to 102106 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.
    2008-04-09 20:59:56.84 Server      CPU time stamp frequency has changed from 102106 to 118592 ticks per millisecond. The new frequency will be used.

Maybe you are looking for