Setting Default Values in PO - Multiple Account Assignment

Hello Experts,
How do we set defalut values for the Field "Partial Invoice" in the Account Assignment Tab(Multiple Acc Assignment) of Purchase Order/Purchase Requisistion.
This field is not available in Personal settings of "PO Item", also there is no "Parameter ID" available for this field.
Regards,
Hemant Kumar B

Hi,
The suggestion provided was useful, but it is a client level setting. Is there a way to have the value for the field defaulted as a user setting.
Regards,
Hemant Kumar B

Similar Messages

Multiple Account assignment in PO cause no GR value

HI,
In PO, we have multiple account assignment, and thus the GR,Non-Valuated will be checked automatically. In this case, we can only have the financial posting have the invocie receipt time.
We can have the correct financial posting, but will not the real time posting after GR before IR.
Like we have GR, but after 2 months we shall have IR. Before we IR, we can not found any Financial posting for Goods receipt. Do we have any solution for this?
Kerry Liu

May i ask the reason why SAP can not do value GR for multi-accoutn assignment? As our Finance team to have financial posting when they have the good receipt, seemed it's hard to do if we use multi-account assignment? or any other better ways?

Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

Hello Experts,
We are facing the below issue,
We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Santhosh Kumar.G

Hi
Check this OSS notes : 1644804
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Need to set default value on Account Search

HI All,
In BSP BP_HEADSEARCH view MainSearch I need to default the value of the attribute 'RESP_AREA' to '01'. I can see the attribute on the value node SEARCH but when get the current context of SEARCH the entity is of a type CL_CRM_BOL_DQUERY_SERVICE and I am not sure how to set the default value.
Any help will be appreciated,
Regards,
Tom

Hi Tom,
When it comes to setting values in a search entity you can not use the normal getter/setter methods because the context node class will be inherited from CL_BSP_WD_CONTEXT_NODE_ASP. In the context node class there will be few attributes (FIELD,MAX_HITS,OPERATOR,VALUE1,VALUE2) that corresponds to the fields diosplayed in the search criteria. The fields VALUE1 and VALUE2 represents the LOW and HIGH values.
To set default value for RESP_AREA you must redefine SET_VALUE1 method and read the ATTR_NAME. If ATTR_NAME is RESP_AREA then you can set the value.
Method SET_VALUE1.
* Get current criterion
data: criterion type ref to if_bol_bo_property_access.
if iterator is bound.
    criterion = iterator->get_current( ).
else.
    criterion = me->parameter_collection->get_current( ).
endif.
* Set its low value from user input
try.
      data: lv_value type string.
      lv_value =
         me->convert_value_from_string( iv_string = value
                                        iv_criterion = criterion ).
      criterion->set_property( iv_attr_name = 'LOW'
                               iv_value = lv_value ).       "#EC NOTEXT
    cleanup.
*     Keep buggy user input for correction
      criterion->set_property( iv_attr_name = 'LOW'
                               iv_value = value ).          "#EC NOTEXT
endtry.
* Set the default value for RESP_AREA
lv_attr_name = criterion->get_property_as_string( 'ATTR_NAME' ).
if lv_attr_name eq 'RESP_AREA'.
    criterion->set_property( iv_attr_name = 'LOW' iv_value = ---- ).
Endif.
Regards,
Arun

Any opinions on setting default values on Business Partner level?

Hi All,
I do not have a question, but would like to have a good discussion on how you should preferably be setting default values on a business partner and it's assignment blocks.
In my opinion you have two main alternatives:
1. The "old fashioned" way by using the get_<attribute_name> method and doing some checks for the perticular attribute in the context node.
2. Using the Badi BADI_CRM_BP_UIU_DEFAULTS to fill fields with a default value. With some enhancements on the assignment blocks (making typed_context attribute public and, when not called yet, calling the badi) you can use the badi for all assignment blocks.
Because I discovered via debugging that in the, by many forums suggested, badi code a programm error/exception is used so that the default values are only set during creation mode, I started doubting to use the badi. Because once I had set my data declarations to the right references and the exception did not occur anymore, suddenly it always fills the values even when there are already values filled. So additional checks are needed to assure that I am in creation mode.
Although I like the use of the badi, because all my default values on the whole business partner object can be found in the same place, it is getting a bit strange to: first still enhance the view and context node class, adjust the visibility of the typed_context, call the badi and do all kind of checks to assure that you are in the right view/context node, where this all is faster and more lean and mean when done directly in the get_<attribute_name> method on a context node.
Anyone who wants to give there opinion on this?
Regards,
Martijn.

Cameron,
Unfortunately you cannot pass the Account and Contact name before saving the record. Post default tries to capture the name just before the record gets saved, but as the record is yet to be created, the relationship wont exist and only the respective id fields will have values. If you try using account id/ contact id it will work else just pass the time stamp in the name field which will make sure there is some value when the record is saved. later in the back end you might need WS to update the field values.

Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

Hi Gurus,
We are in SRM 4 SP13 and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that PO subsequently.
When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created with
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
But for Services it is created as
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
Is this a standard behaviour or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
Rajesh

Hi there,
Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when
sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:
SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv
to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.
It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with
multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is
proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this
indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi
to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.
You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you
can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.
This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.
You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
======================================
set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services
for material items and the service lines
it is derived from distribution type in EBP
    IF next > 1.
      IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR
         po_items-item_cat = '1' .
        po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung
      ENDIF.
      po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
    ELSE.
      CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.
======================================
Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
Hope this points you in the right direction.
Regards,
Matthew

Multiple account assignment with non valuated gr

hi,
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
pls explain why system behave like this?
regards
sumit simran

Hi,
Yes for asset GRN always non-valuated
check following sap not also
Note 9175 - No value update is performed for goods movements
check setting of OMS9 for asset A you will get clear idea
check following link also
[Asset PO;
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JM

Hi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas

Pass variable and set default value based on user's group

Hello
I'm using SharePoint 2010 and SQL 2012. I need to send a variable to the page and based on its value, set default value for a drop down list and send it to other web part to filter the data. Is it possible for certain users to send that value as a default
and limit user to see only this value in the text field or drop down list; for others - to allow to see the drop down list, but also set the default value for that list?
The main page was designed in SharePoint designer, using web parts (aspx page). I had setup a connection to Active Directory and already have the code to get user's groups and based on their group, I have that variable pulled into the web page for further
use. But I don't know how to pass that value as a default value to the web part (currently using SharePoint Filter web part). When I tried to set a default value for the web part - it automatically puts the quotation marks around the name of the variable
and shows it as a text instead of showing the value of the field.
Thank you!
P.s. I have limited knowledge of SharePoint and need guidance (links, examples, recommendations)!
Alla Sanders

Thank you for your response. I'll try to give you more details. On PageA I check user's groups and based on the group, assign the value and pass it to the next page (no input from the user, all done behind the scene and user is redirected to PageB).
On the next page I read that value and would like to send it to the SharePoint List Filter Web as a default value, as well as send it to another web part that displays the list from SQL, filtered using that default value. Ideally, if the user is from Group
A, I'd like for them to have only one value in that drop down list; if user is from Group B - give him drop down list with 40 items to choose from. Below there is a part of the code and variable fnum has the value from PageA (if I print the value on the screen
- I do see that it has correct value, so the code that gets groups from Active directory works correctly). If I assign fnum as a default value of the list, it shows "fnum" instead of the value of variable fnum. I connect to SQL database, using external
content - so the other list that I'm filtering based on the value in that drop down list - is XSLT Data View Web part. I also have 2 more filters on that page, that user will have full access to and based on their input, it is also sent to the XSLT web part
to filter out more data. Since one of the filters is the date and I am filtering data starting from the date that user chooses - XSLT is the only web part that I was able to make it work with.
I looked at the link you provided (thank you). It is using Content Query Web part. Will it work with external content, as well as accepting multiple filtering, including custom starting date? I appreciate your help!
<%
string fnum = Request.QueryString["field1"];
%><table cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="height: 1000px">
<tr>
<td id="_invisibleIfEmpty" name="_invisibleIfEmpty" colspan="2" valign="top" style="height: 101px">
<WebPartPages:WebPartZone runat="server" Title="loc:Header" ID="Header" FrameType="TitleBarOnly"><ZoneTemplate>
<WpNs0:SpListFilterWebPart runat="server" FilterMainControlWidthPixels="0" RequireSelection="False" ExportMode="All" PartImageLarge="/_layouts/images/wp_Filter.gif" AllowHide="False" ShowEmptyValue="True" MissingAssembly="Cannot import this Web Part." AllowClose="False" ID="g_1ccc4bca_3ba1_480b_b726_adfdb1e9e02d" IsIncludedFilter="" DetailLink="" AllowRemove="False" HelpMode="Modeless" AllowEdit="True" ValueFieldGuid="fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247" IsIncluded="True" Description="Filter the contents of web parts by using a list of values from a Office SharePoint Server list." FrameState="Normal" Dir="Default" AllowZoneChange="True" AllowMinimize="False" DefaultValue="fnum" Title="Facilities List Filter" PartOrder="2" ViewGuid="2da5d8db-6b55-4403-80a8-111e42049f8b" FrameType="None" CatalogIconImageUrl="/_layouts/images/wp_Filter.gif" FilterName="Facilities List Filter" HelpLink="" PartImageSmall="/_layouts/images/wp_Filter.gif" AllowConnect="True" DescriptionFieldGuid="2d97730a-cd0d-4cb9-8b55-424951201081" ConnectionID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" ExportControlledProperties="True" TitleIconImageUrl="/_layouts/images/wp_Filter.gif" ChromeType="None" SuppressWebPartChrome="False" IsVisible="True" ListUrl="/Lists/FacilitiesList" AllowMultipleSelections="False" ZoneID="Header" __MarkupType="vsattributemarkup" __WebPartId="{768E2035-0461-4A09-8DDD-CA7020C2B23D}" WebPart="true" Height="" Width="615px"></WpNs0:SpListFilterWebPart>
Alla Sanders

Automatic multiple account assignment

Hi expert,
Is it possible to put by default the account assignment in my PO?
In my case, i have to put a multiple account assignment for one G/L account.
Is it possible to do that in standard? and how to do it?
Thanks in advance,
Chris

If you have multiple assignment you can't have valued receipt, but if i disable the flag i have no message.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is theAP standard feature of S.

Multiple Account Assignment In Purchase Order

I've found something about multiple account assingment. If i have multiple assignment i can't have valued receipt, but if i desable the flag i have no message. Can I set a material to force to enable GR indicator and force to disable GR indicator?

When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
As for second part No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category.

Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

Hello,
We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
- "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
- "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
- "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. = "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
Thank you for your help.
Regards.
Laurent.

Hello,
During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
- either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
- or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
Regards.
Laurent.

Invoice issue for Multiple Account assigned PO

Hello
We are facing an issue with a Serive PO which has account assigned to cost centre (K).8 costcentres are assigned .
While booking invoice on one particular date the invoice amount got distributed among all the 8 cost centres but on some other day when invoice was booked it was allocated to only the first costcentre.
can somebody help me with the logic how the invoice gets distributed and what could be the reason the invoice amount is not distributed among all the costcentres and only one.
Regards
Sarika

Hi Sarika,
please have a look at the following notes:
568541     MIRO: Default values with multiple account assignme
457740     MIRO/MR1M: Default values, amts for multiple accou
395043     FAQ: Posting invoices using Transaction MIRO
428157 MIRO: percentage multiple accnt assgnt f. service-based IV
Please also check the customize settings to in Tr:OME9, under 'partial
invoice' what is the settings to the cost center.
Also note in MIRO, system distribute the corresponding GR quantity into
acc.assignment's items proportionately based on the indicator 'Partial
invoice' and the data 'Distribution percentage'(VPROZ) in the screening
'acc.assignment' within the PO/item.
You can change the "Partial invoice' in the screening 'acc.assignment"
as '1' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities one after another)
instead of using 2 "Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities
proportionately".
Please check also include LMRMKF02.
Regards,
Edit
Regards,
Edit

GR/IR Rounding Logic for Multiple Account Assignment

We have activated business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 (EHP4 release 604), GR valuated. When choosing Distribution on quantity basis and distribute partial inv proportionally, the MIGO postings are different from the MIRO postings. For example, we have a quantity of 12 that we allocate to two different cost centers 33.3 / 66.7 %. We receive a partial qty of 5. MIGO distributes the quantity 1.665 / 3.335, respectively. However, MIRO distributes the quantity 1.666 / 3.333 respectively. Since MIRO is supposed to accept the MIGO quantities and amounts, why is the percentage allocation different? Is there a way to make the percentages equal for MIGO / MIRO? Modification of the percentage field (VPROZ) in the PO to more than 1 decimal is not an option.
Example
    PO (quantity-based distribution, partial inv is proportional: Receive partial Qty 5 of total 12
                         Net Value            Qty              Percen           MIGO           MIRO
    Item:            9,600.00 USD    12.000 pc     100.00       4,340.00      4,340.00
    Account 1: 3,200.00 USD      4.000 pc        33.3         1,446.67      1,446.96
    Account 2: 6,400.00 USD      8.000 pc        66.7         2,893.33      2,893.04
The small difference of $0.29 for this example is inconsequential, but for larger quantieis it will have a greater impact on the account allocation.

U set or U dont set system will flag the GR non valuated once u assign multiple account assignment.
But SAP is coming up with GR valuated for Multiple account assignment in enhancement package 4.
Check out EP4 Presentation at........
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/erp-ehp
Venkat

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

Setting Default Values in PO - Multiple Account Assignment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for