Settlement in the same period

Dear Experts,
For a maintenance oder , we have issued components in the month of july ( Value Rs 300 ) and the order was confirmed in the month of August ( Expenses Rs 200 ) . When we settled the order , only the component value ( Rs 300 ) was settled in the month of july against periodic settlement and the activity expenses ( Rs 200) are settling for month August . When we tried to settle both expenses in the month of july system is not accepting . Is it a standard behaviour ?
What shall we do to settle both incurred cost ( Rs 300 + Rs 200 ) in the month of july . what are the financial implications if the system settle spares cost in the month of july and activity expenses in the month of August ?

Hi Chola,
It is standard behavior.
When you are trying to settle order in July at that your order had only material cost (Rs. 300) . There were no expenses Rs. 200.
So system wont accept the full settlement in July.
Instead you have both values in August, so you can settle in August.
Or if you want to settle order in July then you need to confirm the order in July, and make actual cost available in July.
Sundar

Similar Messages

Two different settlements in a same period

Dear Experts,
My user wishes to use 2 different settlement rules in the same period.
Details:
One settlement(WBS to WBS) will be done for all the transactions till 19th of a month. All other transactions carried out after 19th are for some other purpose, hence user wants to carry out different settlement for transactions after 19th(WBS to CE/GL).
Since the period is the same, both the rules get executed simultaneously.
Kindly help.
Manish

Dear Kealin F/Virendra Pal,
Can you elaborate more on this, "create two settlement rules and enter the distribution rules". Do you mean to say enter two line items on the Maintain settlement rule:Overview table.
If yes, should I maintain settlement type as "Full" as I assume that this will allow me to do two postings in 1 period. Correct me if I am wrong?
Thanks,
Manish
Edited by: mash215 on Apr 1, 2010 7:32 AM

Schedule parallel activities on different resources for the same period

Hi,
I am trying to create a PPM where I need to define parallel activities on different resources for the same time period.
For example:
Input prod: P1
Output prod: O1
Now I define a dummy activity A1 to define this consumption i.e. 1 PC of P1 gives 1 PC of O1.
Now I have got 3 resources R1, R2, R3.
I define 3 activities A2, A3, A4 for these resources.
Now I have to arrange activities A2, A3, A4 such that they start simultaneouly after activity A1 and also end simultaneouly.
The Fixed duration for all the resources is 1 week.
My requirement is that out of these resources system should plan for demand considering the resource with minimum capacity
i.e. kind of bottleneck resource.
I am using CTM engine for planning.
I have defined A1 as predecessor for all the 3 activities A2, A3, A4 and after completion all the activities have a dummy successor activity S.
But this setting is not working and PPM is not getting exploded, If I use a normal linear relationship between activities it works fine but my requirement is not getting satisfied.
Can anyone please help me in this case or suggest some alternate method.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanjog Mishrikotkar

Hi,
You cannot use the old solman key as systems are on different server.
I think you have to delete the old Dev system and then generate new solman key.
Thanks
Sunny

F.05- Exchange diff amnt getting posted twice in the same period

We have an issue relating to the F.05 job run in SAP. This T-code will revaluate all the forex transactions to the specified rate only once during the month and post the differential entry to ensure that all the balances are restated.
During the month of Mar 08, while we processed the F.05, we were not able to take the download in excel and hence we again processed F.05 inorder to extract the report. While we processed again F.05, the system has again posted another entry in SAP for the same amount as earlier.
I am explaning with an example as below :
First Run : System Entry
Dr. Exch Difference Rs. 200
Cr. Revaluation A/c Rs.(200)
Second Run : System Entry
Dr. Exch Difference Rs. 200
Cr. Revaluation A/c Rs.(200)
Net Imapact
Dr. Exch Difference Rs. 400
Cr. Revaluation A/c Rs.(400)
Based on the above example, the system has processed the F.05 run twice and posted the amounts double. Let us know whether the F.05 needs to be processed only once a month (if yes, then how do we extract a report if needed later), or can we process multiple times in a month (in that case, there shouldn't be additional entries posted).

Hi,
Usually, F.05 only run once per month or per quarter. There are two kinds of FX run,
1) balance sheet preparation valuation, it was selected if you check the box in the posting page. System would generate the FX posting, plus write a FX difference amount to each open item. And when you run the transaction 2nd time in next month, only the difference between 1st and 2nd time would be posted. Let's say if next month has the same valuation rate as 1st time, then, it would not have postings generated.
2) Valuation without open item flagged, system would valuate the open items all the time as new, there is no flag in the open item which has been valuated. Therefore, every time when you run the valuation and postings would be generated no matter your valuation rate has been changed or not. And usually, would reverse the postings on the 1st day of next period.
In your case, I think you are running the 2nd type since you have 2nd batch of postings generated which have the same value as the first one. Please check whether it is correct, because it would have different correction handling for each type.
If you are the 2nd type, just simply reverse one of the batches documents by F.80 is ok.
Regards,

How to get the same period last year value using Fiscal Calendar?

Hi there,
I am using DAX in a Tabular Model project but I am getting stuck trying to get the following:
We are using a Fiscal Calendar (from 01 April to 31 March).
Previous Period Value
Value
2012
April
15
May
10
Jun
20
2013
April
15
30
May
10
20
Jun
20
25
I have tried to use sameperiodlastyear but there is an error saying that this function cannot be used for non contiguous dates. DATEADD is given the same error...
Could anyone help me getting the right measure expressions for [Previous Period Value]?
Thanks and best regards,
Joss

Hi Joss,
In SQL Server Analysis Services, we can can compare revenue with the hierarchy periods (year, month, day) by using the PARALLELPERIOD function, and now you want to compare with custom periods. (NOTE: We cannot compare it with the PARALLELPERIOD function
since
PARALLELPERIOD function returns a member from a prior period in the same relative position as a specified member. So if the first time span not equal to the second one (such as the first period is 3 days, and the second period is 2 month)). Here
is a sample query about PARALLELPERIOD function for your reference.
with
set Hotels as
[Hotels].[Hotel ID].&[1015],
[Hotels].[Hotel ID].&[5640],
[Hotels].[Hotel ID].&[8800]
set Period as [Arrival Date].[Date].[Month].&[2012]&[1]:[Arrival Date].[Date].[Month].&[2012]&[12]
member [Arrival Date].[Date].[0] as sum({ Period })
member [Total Amount N-1] as (PARALLELPERIOD([Arrival Date].[Date].[Year], 1, [Arrival Date].[Date].[Year].&[2012]), [Measures].[Total Amount])
select
[Measures].[Total Amount],
[Measures].[Total Amount N-1]
} on 0,
nonemptycrossjoin
Hotels,
Hotels.[Hotel].children,
*{[Arrival Date].[Date].[0]}
} on 1
from [Booking_Cube]
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

TS4088 Does this extended warranty only apply to the 15" MacBook Pro's as i have a 13" that is experiencing the same problems and was manufactured during the same period...

as stated in the title, im experiencing the BSOD, have tried all possible solutions and its poihnting to the logic board being duff. did they extend the warranty on the 13" 2010 MBP's??

Bad Idea. You see, you are basing your decision on a flawed concept: that a desktop is the same as a portable. While the iMac does use some miniaturization concepts in order to stuff everything into a single box, in no way does it approach the degree it is done in any portable, much less in a 1" thick 13" MBP. Then add the added risk factors involved in something that goes to and fro all over the place, and you will have to agree that a portable's life is much more prone to danger.
But what's done is done and this can now only be a learning experience for the next purchase. Only glimmer of hope is that Apple recently lost a court ruling in the EU and is now mandated to honor the standard 2-year base warranty for electronic goods you all have over there; use that either as a negotiating tool to get it fixed outright or to see if you can still purchase the AppleCare extension. After all, AppleCare states that you need to purchase it while the base warranty is still in effect.
Good luck.

OK to Rerun FAGLF101 for the Same Period?

We run FAGLF101 every month in order to account for reconcilation account and trading partner changes. My actual situation is a bit more complicated, but let's say that I just discovered a large number of customers with incorrect recon accounts that were first used in November. If we correct them now and rerun FAGLF101 for November, will it duplicate the entries made on the previous run or only make postings for the new customer changes? Grateful for any advice.
P.S. We do not have a handle on the exact customers that have changed so running for just the changed customers is not practical as we have numerous companies and it would take a huge amount of effort to identify a list for each company.

hi,
sap gurus,
good evening toall,
r u sure that with one transaction code my work gets complete.
plz confirm
regards,
balaji.t
09990019711

Double service entry sheet for the same invoice and same period

Hi,
2 service entry sheets have been made for the same PO with the same period and the same invoice no. And hence by mistake 2 bills have been passed for the same work...
how to avoid this.....
is there any std.setting available while creating service entry sheet.
Plz. help
Navin

If there is sufficient quantity in the PO, this cannot be prevented by the system.
Have the data entry person write the SE Sheet number on the physical copy of the bill so that another person entering it can see that SE Sheet is done.
Hope this helps,
Lakshman

How can I retrieve the same figure twice in report?

Hi guys,
If we have the same selection twice in the same report, it only retrieves the figure once (see example below, were the same period has been chosen twice). Is there any setting I can adjust, so it will retrieve the figures for double-selected members also?
Thanks,
Dorthe

Hi Dorthe,
No issues in my system (BW 7.3, BPC SP12, EPM SP16 patch1):
B.R. Vadim

User exit to calculate Same period Last Year

Dear gurus,
can some help me to code the user exit to calculate the same period last year for bex variable
i.e
System date :18.05.2010
Same period last tear : 18.05.2009
Your help highly appreciated
Thank you
BR

Hi,
The above code creates problem only when date is 29th of Feb.
To find whether year -1 is leap yr or not include following code also:
l_year = sy-datum(4)-1 .
l_mod4 = l_year mod 4.
l_mod100 = l_year mod 100.
l_mod400 = l_year mod 400.
if ( l_mod4 = 0 and l_mod100 ne 0 ) or l_mod400 eq 0.
if( l_date = 29)
l_date= l_date -1.
endif.
endif.
Modify your code according to youe need. Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Jitender.

New costing run within same period for relased cost estimate

Hi All
Once we have run the costing run. The price is marked and released. Then If we have to again runthe costing run, system says price for the priod has been released and doesnt allow to proceed.
How to overcome this? Cant we run costing run as and when required and multiple times release it in the same period?
Please help me
Regards
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
I would like to know what is your requirement of running the Standard Cost Estimate for second or third time in the same period...?
If you feel that, Standard Cost which was marked and released needs to be updated as per the changes in BOM, Routing etc, you can still do it...
First, go to transaction code CKR1 (Re-organization of Cost Estimates), select the parameters like company code, plant, material (for which you want to reverse the Cost Estimate), select the radio button for "Current Standard Cost Estimate" and execute.
Then, Current Standard Cost Estimate will get reversed. You check for confirmation in the respective material master -- Costing 2 View whether the Current Planned Price has become blank or not.
Then you do CK11N and CK24 again for marking and releasing....
Try this and pls revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Making system to use the latest Infotype Record for the Current Period

Hello,
I would like to know how the system behave if there is a record modified in the middle of the Pay Period, which record would the PY schema use? Ex: in IT0009 EE has selected multiple Bank Transfer. He say 100$ Bank 1 and Rest to Bank 2. In the middle if the Pay period, the EE comes and makes changes to his Bank Transfer, as he closed the account in Bank1, he creates new Bank and transfers 100$. Now when the PY run, it think both Banks (Bank1 prev and Bank 1 current ) are valid and tries to send 100$ to each back and sends rest to Bank2. Which is not correct. This issue happens when someone changes their record in the middle of the period. So It is assumed to change the process to not to change in the middle of the period. It has to be effecting of 1st of next period.
But I want to check is there anyway we can make the system to use the latest one if it finds multiple record for the same period?
any suggestion please.
Thank you.
Raj

Hi Donnie,
This system actually delimits the previous record but since the change is happened in the middle of the period, but record are considered as active.
For Ex: The Pay Period is 01/01/2009 to 01/15/2009 and There was a record for Bank1 for that period and user comes and creates a new record on 01/05/2009 for Bank1. Now for this payperiod since its with the period both records are becoming active. So system uses both the records and deducts. Hope you get what I'm saying.
Thanks,
Raj

Product Costing - Two Costing Variants - Mark and Release In Same Company Code Same Period

Hi All,
We are currently handling a CO-PC project where client has requirement to use two different costing variants in the same period in the same company code. SAP standard does not allow use of two costing variants in the same period for the same company. We can have only One Costing Variant per Co Code for Marking / Releasing Standard Price.
There are some materials in Plant 1 or Plant 2 for which cost estimates using costing variant ABC1 calculated and than prices are marked and released (CK24), now same materials are received in Plant3 where mixed costing is used and thus need to have cost estimates from second costing variant ABC3 (second costing variant) marked and released. Object is to have ABC3 cost estimates in material master standard price field, but SAP does not allow to mark and release for second costing variant in the same period for same co code as ABC1 variant already ran for plant1 or Plant2 under same company code,therefore, business is not able update ABC3 prices in Standard price of the material master.
Purpose of this second costing variant mark and release run is that for some materials business would like to implement costing at Plant3 level also, where they get same materials from different production sites (Plants). At Plant3 level, business is using mixed costing where the standard price is a weighted Average standard price, taking the different production sites standard cost into consideration in combination of the volume split between those production sites.
Did any one worked on this kind of requirement? Is there any SAP standard way to handle? Or this will need some ABAP enhancement?
Kindly advise.

Hi Atul
1. You dont need separate Valuation Variant in Plant 3
2. Use Costing Variant ABC1 and ensure that it has the needed Valuation Strategies in Valuation Variant
Allow Complete Transfer in the Transfer Control i.e. Cross Plant Transfer in it
3. Assign the Qty Str Type you have used in ABC3, to ABC1.. i.e. In the Costing Version, assign the Qty Str Type to the Costing Type and Valuation Variant from ABC1
After this, do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 1
Then do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 3, using ABC1.. You dont need to change anythiing before doing CK11N for Plant 3
To make it simple, you can use any one of ABC1 or ABC3 in both the plants.. You only need to ensure that Valuation Variant, TRansfer Control are set up as desired
Br. Ajay M

I'm in the trial period for Creative Cloud - I have about 19 days to go on Photoshop CC on my iMac. Can I use the same CC trial on a second machine? Specifically on a Windows 7 machine?

I'm in the trial period for Creative Cloud - I have about 19 days to go on Photoshop CC on my iMac. Can I use the same CC trial on a second machine? Specifically on a Windows 7 machine?

Nothing personal to you or Rajshee, but this is exactly why I absolutely despise these "community forums" (not just Adobe but any company). I called the Tech Support phone line today after digging and digging for a phone number, and they told me the exact opposite, and they did it a lot faster than it was possible to get a forum response. (That's really not personal, because you can't control that, but it's a fact.)
Their answer: As long as I'm signed in with the same ID, I can try, say, Photoshop CC on my iMac at home and also try Acrobat Pro CC on my Windows 7 machine at work. Same account, same login, one trial.
This makes complete sense to me as I'm financially on the hook (potentially) for the same package. If I give away my login to someone else, which I wouldn't do, I'm still on the hook. This is why the cloud approach to software is such genius and I applaud it.
BTW, 99% of the "community forum" wrong answers come on Microsoft sites, so don't feel bad.

Add Suppporting Details for more than one periods at the same time for the same Account in Planning.

As we know, in planning form, we can add supporting details to one cell for the level 0 members intersections.
But can we do that as below:
add supporting details for more than one cells at the same time?
I tried to do that in workspace and smartview, neither is working.(my workspace version 11.1.2.2.300.20)
I wonder if i am not with the right version, because i don't know how to get the below.
Can any one explain?
Thank you.

Hi,
I have tried in Smartview for a simple form where my period dimension was in columns and accounts in rows.
You need to select multiple period and select supporting details, it will show those selected period for which you can add the supporting details.
You can add these details and then submit the data in the form.
Regards,
Sourabh

Settlement in the same period

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for