Settlement of Refurbishment Order?

Dear SAPIENTS,
I have created Refurbishment and processed the refurbishment order and now when i am going to settle the maintenance order its giving me the error Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed . But I have already TECO the order and refurbished material posted to the specified storage location. Also confirmation done. Delivered quantity is showing 2 in maintenance order.
Can anyone suggest what can be the reason for this error.
Regards,

Hi
please check in the order if you have assigned RAK by mistake or check in the profile
there should not be any RAK in the order profile sicne this a maintenance order not production order
it is related to settlement profile only
Regards
pratap

Similar Messages

Problem in settlement of Refurbishment order

Hi Gurus,
I have problem in the settlement (KO88) of refurbishment order. I am getting error " Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed"
Message no. KD258
But i have already done final delivery in T-code IW8W & Technical Completion is already done.
So why i am getting this error.
Kindly help me in this matter.
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Vivek
As its a refurbishment order , after completing your all maintenance work , refurbished part to be send back to storage location , this is called as **FINAL DELIVERY ** in refurbish,
After that you can do a technical completion and go for settlement.
Shail

Cost of sales not getting generated during final settlement of refurbishment order

Hi
We use refurbishment Order and we have settlement receiver as PSG. We use RA Key. We use raw material components CE 1, , We confirm debit labor,
we also receive Revenue cost element category 11 .
We have RA key assigned in the Order.
Now We ran and save values of RA and run KO88 and Dr. WIP Cr. Cons offset is credited. this is when the status is REL and when the status is TECO, then we calculate RA and run KO88 RA is reversed. Now COGS is not getting populated at all and there is no CO PA document also. Kindly let me know the configuration needed for this purpose. I need this very urgently.
This is a simple scenario and this no connection with SD as of now.
Aparaajith

Hi Szymon
We have 3 types of refurbishment order type
1. External Consulting services
Here the cost of labor, consulting charges are booked against this service order
Since the job is done more than 2 months then at the end of 1st month WIP is calculated
2nd month job is done -TECO, so the reverse WIP and cost of Sales comes into play.
Here they book revenue against the service order. Since MTO is not used here, based on status of the order TECO, they create billing request and billing where service order is the cost object
So Service Orders hold costs 2nd month end rev and cost.
My problem is the RA what I use does not create Cost of Sales automatically I know there is some configuration is wrong.
2nd issue: CO PA does not get created when I do TECO and consequently I am unable to move sales and cost of sales to copa.
2. third party repair
Here there is no link between sales order and refurbishment order.
So no revenue is booked for this refurbishment order
Next they issue material and move to WIP and 2nd month they move the cost to COS ,reverse WIP>
I use a RA key which does move COS creation of entry.
This is my problem
How to move to COS without revenue and I will create manually 2nd month by using a report to take TECO status and then create revenue entries through SD.
I need response very soon, if you can give me.
Aparaajith

Can we settle refurbishment order periodically

Hi All
our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material

Hi,
Please note that in refurbishment case cost is settled to material and this settlement need to be periodic.
You can do settlement after TECO. TECO is technical completion and settlement can be done after TECO also.
However as you said cost are settled to cost centre ,but how it is possible coz settlement receiver is material and not cost centre for refurbishment.They may not able to see correct costs in respective period but cost will always get settled to material(means added to inventory accounts after settlement).
It is advisable to settle incurred costs on refurbishment order as early as possible,so costs will reflect into inventory accounts and within correct period and this is standard practice also.
regds,
atul
Edited by: Atul Mali on Apr 15, 2009 1:52 PM

Can we settle refurbishment order(Plant Maintenance) periodically

Hi All
our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material
Thanks in advance
gangs

Hi,
this seems like a WIP (work in progress) scenario, maybe you can try a results analysis version.
best regards,
Luis

Refurbishment order- Actual settlement

Dear Experts,
When i am trying to do actual settlement using the transaction code KO88 for the refurbishment order for which even after the techical completion and the IW8W (Goods receipt) done, system is throwing the following error:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed
Message no. KD258
Diagnosis
If you want to settle a production order to a material, you must first either enter the final delivery for it, or close (complete) it technically because settlement leads to an update of the moving average price for the material. The total delivery quantity is required for this. If the order is one which cannot be delivered because, for example, it produces 100% scrap, you can close it technically instead. Settlement is than to the price difference account.
By the settlement period, no final delivery had been entered for this order, nor had it been technically closed (completed). This means that you cannot settle it.
Procedure
Before settling, either set the order to "Technically completed" or enter the final delivery.
Please help me out...
Regards,
Suresh.
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:28 PM
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:31 PM

Hi,
When i am changing the settlement period from 12 2008 to 01 2009 , it is throwing the following error:
Please throw your ideas what could be reason?
Account determination for entry 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.

Settlement is done of Refurbishment order.

Hi Gurus,
I have created a Refurbishment order issued the spares,done the GR also done the technically completed but while doing the settlement ko88 the error comes as "Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed".Pls suggest what are the thing i need to check for this.

Hi,
Please refer to below threads for your reference.
Refurbishment order cost settle error
Message KD258 - Settle Process Order by KO88
Hope this would solve your problem.
Regards,

Account requires an assignment to a CO object as settle a refurbishment ord

We have an outstanding refurbishment order which can't be settled. The system gave a message like "Account XXX requires an assignment to a CO object". In settlement rule, the refurbished material was set as a receiver. Others refurbishment order were normal and can be settled. We have checked the configuration of settlement profile and cost allocation structure. No problem was found. Where can I start to solve it? Any comments will be appriciated!

Hi
Same problem we have automated by work flow
Is there any ocst on order ?
what we have a found a way that this order is to be confimred & materiral issued to be posted only after work order gets teco
We have valutaion type material c3 as price =001 which is lowest
so in between if the order is settled there is now cost
& if the work is finished then it will automatically settled by work flow
Regards
Pratap bhikaji

Account Assignment Category MAT for refurbishment order

Hi friends,
At tcode OKO6 (customizing of Settlement cost elements), Allocation structures, Assignments, Settlement cost elements, Receiver cat. - Input help (F1)
I need to find the object type 'MAT' for account assignment category that will be used by the refurbishment orders settlement profile (order type 30).
The problem: the object type 'MAT' is not available at the input help list.
The object type 'MAT' is in the table TBO01 and it is assigned to TBO01-OBART but it does not appear in the OKO6 input help list.
Your suggestions will be welcome.
Regards,
Roberto

Yes, you are right. It is necessary to create or modify a settlement profile and to do the assignments like Allocation structure and the Default object type (in my case it has to be 'MAT' for material) in tcode OKO7. It was customized without problem.
But before to run tcode OKO7 we have to run tcode OKO6 and create the Allocation structure. It was done but we could not do the assignment to the object type MAT because the input help (F4) does not show this option. The help shows many options like ORD (order), CTR (cost center), FXA (asset), G/L (G/L account), etc., but the MAT option does not appear.
How to make the object type MAT available in the Receiver cat. in Settlement cost elements in tcode OKO6???
Regards,
Roberto

Confirmation for Refurbishment Order

Dear Experts,
For refurbishment order after the service entry sheet is confirmation of activities required ? If required it should be carried out before service entry sheet or after that ? Please advice.
Regards,
Vivid

Dear Thiagarajan,
Thanks for the reply. I have done GR using MB31 as the system not allowing me to do GR through IW8W .
Now the cost of the material got updated. Kindly tell whether I am proceeding in the right direction as per the below sequence.
Creation of Split valuation Material
Creation of service entry sheet
Creation of Refurbishment order with control key PM03
Release of the order
Goods issue for the order
Creation of PO with the PR generated
Release of the PO
Entry and release of service entry sheet ( will the cost for service only get updated? Not possible to post the material also to the refurbishment order?)
Good receipt for the order
Technical completion of the order
Settlement of the order
Closing the order
Thanks and Regards,
Vivid

Valuation type after refurbished order

Hi All,
I have done a refurbishment order from valuation type C1 to valuation type C2. After settle the order the average moving price was updated, so till now is everything ok.
If I'll display the equipment, in serial number data tab, "Stock Batch" and "Master Batch" remains in the old valuation (in my case C1). In MMBE I have the correct quantities in C1 and C2 stock.
Does any one know what is the problem and how to solve it?
Regards,
Rogério Reis

HI
Have you posted the material by IW8W or not
What is screen you are getting at posting the tocde IW8W
IT will indiacte to you from whcih valuatio type to which type you want to post the material
check the valutaion type you entered in Refurbsihemnt order whether it is C1 to c2 coeerctly (ihope c1 is scrapped ,c2 Refurbised ,c3 -New )
check
Regards
chandrasehkhar

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Settlement for refurbishment goods issues

Hi SAP Gurus,
This is regarding a requirement wherein we want the settlement to happen particular to Order type and Company code. As of now when we do the settlement we have the settlement category as "MAT" in the Order and thus the GL account gets picked up as per the setting we have in OBYC for account modifier AUF as AUA is not maintained.
As per our requirement whenever we have the below mentioned parameters system has to post to a particular account.
Work order Document type- MN04
Company Code: XX01
Movement type: 261,262, 101 an 102
GL account: XXXXXX
Please let us know if there is any way we can achieve the above requirement. I am trying the same with substitution. Also be informed that the settlement category is always "MAT".
Regards,
Praveen Kumar

Hi Kamal,
We are using Refurbishment order with order type MN04 and PM consultant insisted that the receiver category will stay as "MAT". We are following this process past many months.
It is now we want to bypass the standard automatic account determination. We want the account to be determined as per above parameters I have mentioned.
Regards,
Praveen

Refurbishament order

Hi all,
I want to know the steps for refurbishment order, What should be the logical steps to configure, I do not want any object list only material planning.
When i create the ref. order , i want to send the spare outside/inhouse...get it repaired and then back to me.
How the cost will be captured and waht will be material movement like,
Thanks

HI AR1,
Required for Refurbishment:
In material master record, a price is defined for the material for each valuation area (=plant or company code).
Each material that is intended for seperate valuation can be classified in the corresponding movement types(eg. new, refurbished, defect).
The movement types corresponds to condition. Movement types & movement categories are maintained in MM Customizing.
Related to cost:
Cost is maintained according to condition of material (i.e. new, refurbished, damaged).
If the movement types (partial stocks) have a valuation with a floating average price, then the overall stock value of the material rises by the effective expenditure of the order (Working time+material) after settlement.
Sundar

Settlement of Sale Order to Sale Order

Dear experts
I need help in the following scenario:
At my client place we are doing job work for external material. All the material are supplied by the customer and our client will do the processing and send it back to customer's customer on customers request.
To create Excise Invoice against the Customers Customer we are handling through 2 sale orders.
First One Sale order will be created against the Customer Order and Sale price will be the selling price of Customers to Customer.
Second Sale Order will be created for Job Work Charges for the processing the materials.
On settling the process orders all the cost is settling to Sale Order One, Clients revenue is coming from Sale Order Two.
Here I need to settle the First Sale Order to Second Sale Order. I have given the second sale Order number in first sale order number in Settlement rule.
But when I settle the First sale Order all the amount it going to Price Differance Account.
How to settle the Cost of First Sale Order to Second Sale Order?
Regards
Kiran A

Dear Experts
any advises.
Can I go for Sale Order to Sale Order Settlement ?
Regards
Kiran

Settlement of Refurbishment Order?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for