SG300 ACE Creation "Already Exists" ?????

I'm configuring ACEs through the browser on an SG300 in L3, and I keep running into an extremely frustrating situation.
About every nine out of ten times I try to save an ACE, I get a message in red text that says the "Entry Already Exists" -- when it clearly does not exist.
I just tried creating a new (empty) ACL, and adding one ACE. Even with that I get the "Already Exists" message when trying to save the first ACE. I've tried saving and rebooting, blowing away the ACL and starting over, and even creating the base ACL and first few rules through the CLI. Same problem, over and over.
What's up Cisco???
I read a couple of posts here that there is a browser-dependent bug, and only IE works well, but I get the exact failure when using Safari, Firefox and IE9.
When I spoke with Cisco SB tech support he said that he has heard about this but he could only suggest that I blow away the config, and reset the switch to factory default (thanks, but no thanks) or post a message here.
Has any one found a solution to this bug? I've been advocating to my small business clients that they use these switches because the bandwidth is very good and the forwarding is rock-solid, but I'm not going to be able to keep using these switches when it takes hours to make a simple ACE change.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts. -Pat

Hi Tom.
Thanks for your help. Here's the running config:
L3SW01#sh run
config-file-header
L3SW01
v1.3.5.58 / R750_NIK_1_35_647_358
CLI v1.0
set system mode router
file SSD indicator encrypted
ssd-control-start
ssd config
ssd file passphrase control unrestricted
no ssd file integrity control
ssd-control-end cb0a3fdb1f3a1af4e4430033719968c0
no spanning-tree
vlan database
vlan 5,80
exit
voice vlan oui-table add 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone________
voice vlan oui-table add 00036b Cisco_phone_____________
voice vlan oui-table add 00096e Avaya___________________
voice vlan oui-table add 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk______________
voice vlan oui-table add 0060b9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
voice vlan oui-table add 00d01e Pingtel_phone___________
voice vlan oui-table add 00e075 Polycom/Veritel_phone___
voice vlan oui-table add 00e0bb 3Com_phone______________
no ip dhcp snooping verify
ip dhcp snooping vlan 1
ip dhcp snooping vlan 80
arp timeout 600
no ip arp proxy disable
ip dhcp relay address 192.168.1.254
ip dhcp relay enable
ip dhcp information option
bonjour interface range vlan 1
ip access-list extended Wireless
permit udp any 67-68 any any
permit udp any any 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 domain
permit icmp 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 any echo-reply any
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 any
exit
hostname L3SW01
logging host 192.168.1.254
logging origin-id string L3SW01
no logging aggregation on
username cisco password encrypted x privilege 15
ip ssh server
snmp-server server
snmp-server location x
snmp-server contact “x”
snmp-server community x rw 192.168.1.119 view Default
snmp-server host 192.168.1.119 traps version 2c x
clock timezone " " -8
clock source sntp
clock source browser
ip domain name rosehaven.private
ip name-server 192.168.1.254 8.8.8.8
ip domain timeout 2
ip domain retry 1
ip telnet server
interface vlan 1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip address dhcp
ip dhcp relay enable
interface vlan 5
name ASA
ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.0
interface vlan 80
name Wireless
ip address 192.168.80.1 255.255.255.0
ip dhcp relay enable
service-acl input Wireless
interface gigabitethernet1
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet2
description "Trunk Lag-A"
ip dhcp snooping trust
channel-group 1 mode auto
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet3
description "NAS Lag-A"
ip dhcp snooping trust
channel-group 2 mode auto
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet4
ip dhcp snooping trust
channel-group 1 mode auto
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet5
description SecServ
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet6
description "Panasonic TV"
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet7
description OPPO
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet8
description "Apple TV"
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet9
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet10
description "Trunk Lag-B"
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet11
description "NAS Lag-B"
ip dhcp snooping trust
channel-group 2 mode auto
switchport mode access
interface gigabitethernet12
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet13
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet14
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet15
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet16
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet17
description APPLE-AP
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 80
interface gigabitethernet18
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface gigabitethernet19
description ASA
ip dhcp snooping trust
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 5
interface gigabitethernet20
ip dhcp snooping trust
interface Port-channel1
description Trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 80
interface Port-channel2
description NAS
switchport mode access
exit
ip default-gateway 192.168.5.1

Similar Messages

SG300, FW 1.2.7.76, "Entry already exists" when changing ACL's

Hello,
I am getting very frustrated trying to modify/create ACL's on my SG300-20 switch.
I have the switch in L3 mode. I have created several VLAN's and ACL's for each VLAN controlling their access to each other. After the initial setup, I have started trying to create more VLAN ACL rules to allow more access between the VLAN's. The problem I keep running in to is that when I go to modify the ACE's in the ACL, I keep getting the error message "Entry already exists". For example, I go to modify the port ranges to tighten them up, and try to save the ACE after modifying it, and I get that error message.
I have gotten frustrated and deleted ACE's, and then tried recreating them, and I get the same error message! I noticed that if I wait long enough (many minutes, hours?) I can go in and create the ACE again. The ACE definitely doesn't exist but the web interface won't let me create it. I've even tried using a completely different Priority value which isn't used in any of the ACL's, that didn't work either.
Why is this happening? At this point I am finding it next to impossible to configure this thing. Frustrating...

Here is a screenshot of one of my ACL's. This ACL is being applied to every port which is in the VLAN with the IP range 10.0.0.0/24
http://imgur.com/C6iQk
I just tried to add a new rule which failed with the same error:
Priority 89
Action: Permit
Source IP Address: 10.0.0.21
Source IP Mask: 0.0.0.0
Destination IP Address: 10.1.0.0
Destination IP Mask: 0.0.0.255
Source Port Range: 8080
Destination Port Range: 49152-65535
So I am trying to allow anything from the 10.1.0.0/24 network to talk to port 8080 on 10.0.0.21. This failed with the "Entry already exists" error.

Fixing entry already exists . Error in creation of fixed pegging

Hi,
we are calling CTP from GATP after product availability check. Using fixed pegging relationship through standarad abap class
error message is coming as
Error occurred during creation of fixed pegging relationships
Fixing entry already exists
Message no. /SAPAPO/OM_ERROR2328
diagnosis
   An application program called an LCA routine. This led to an error.
Procedure for system administrator
Contact SAP Service. Specify the application
message occurred.
You must also enter:
o   The message number
o   Return code 17313 (om_pb_fixentry_exists)
o   Error code COM Core

Dear Santosh,
the common cause for the error LC Return code 17313:
The heuristic tries to determine locking arguments, but other processes are locking these.
Therefore the proposal,
1. Don't run the MRP in a parallel mode.
2. Check the note 513827 for more information.
Regards,
Tibor

Creation of Microsoft Azure Website failed. The application already exists

Trying to create a new website, I get this error:
Creating Microsoft Azure Website
Creation of Microsoft Azure Website failed. The application already exists. The remote server returned an unexpected response: (409) Conflict.
I succeeded to create this website earlier on and then I deleted it as I didn't need it anymore.
Now I want to create it again but I get this error even though I've deleted all websites, hosting plans, cloud service, etc from my Azure account.
Any idea on how to fix this?

At this point, I don't know how it happened, but we'll need to dig deeper. I believe there is a sequence that can cause problems if you create a site via Current portal and delete it via Preview, but I'm not sure.
BTW, it seems you have 2 other sites that may be in the same situation (deleted in a way that you couldn't recreated them). They're 'shortl...dev' and 't..d' (not giving full name to avoid squatters!). Do you think you'll want to recreate them later? If
so, we can do the same maneuver to get back to a good state.

Mess SR 053 - Creation not possible (Mapping for product already exist..

There is an error ocurring when the CIF is executed, this message I can see in the transaction SMQ1, the error " SR 053 - Creation not possible (Mapping for <product> already exists <product> ", the product really exists in APO but I don't know why this error occur because in this case the material should be updated. Anyone know why this error occur ?? and how can I fix ??
When I try to execute only this material in CFM2 no errors occur.
Regards,
Edson Suzuki

We did faced a similar problem. The reason was the external material number was different in both cases.
ie the already existing record has the external material number padded with '0000' and the one coming doesn't have leading '0000'
If this suggestion helps you, please reward by points..
Shibu

Creation of a new wbs elements to an already existing project

1. i am using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI to create a new wbs element in an already existing project.When this is done then i am using BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT and then bapi_transaction_commit
so this creates the wbs element which i guess but only the element.
2. Now i need to attach the networks to it which are there in BOM so i am taking all the network data from the table afko joining it with aufk.It is giving all the network data which was there attached prior to the project but the new one it is not showing.The query is
SELECT afkoaufnr afkopronr aufkpspel aufkktext aufk~loekz
INTO (afko-aufnr, afko-pronr, aufk-pspel, aufk-ktext, aufk-loekz)
FROM ( afko AS afko INNER JOIN aufk AS aufk ON aufkaufnr = afkoaufnr)
WHERE afko~pronr = w_wbs_cur-psphi.
3.Now i am comparing this data from above to the BOM data and take the difference of the networks which are to be created.
But as the above query is not returning the new wbs so it is getting failed.

i am already using this
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_KONPD_INPUT'
    EXPORTING
      input     = g_znpsdata_old-project_definition
    IMPORTING
      output    = w_wbs_cur-psphi
    EXCEPTIONS
      not_found = 1
      OTHERS    = 2.
do i need to use the other one also

New address creation for already existing customer in Oracle

Hi,
We are working on customer conversion and loading all the data into customer interface tables so that we can run the customer interface to move the data into oracle tables.
We need to create another address as per client’s requirement to already existing customer in oracle which has active primary bill_to address.
Can we do this by using customer interface tables or use the API’s for it.
Any pointers regarding this will be highly appreciated.
Thank and Regards,
Rekha Palagani.

i have heared form someone that i should copy some text (from files) or some files which resides in bin folder (i don't know the exact path) in the sql console to access existing tables. is that ture?Not sure what that means... to access existing tables, or to create new ones you have to use Sql commands (or some graphic stuff).
What about reading some documentation ?
System user is a DBA, and can possibly read any tables, but most probably is not the owner of emp table. To know it you can do
SQL> select owner from dba_tables where table_name='EMP';
then connect to that user, or, as system user, do
SQL> select * from <owner>.emp;

Error creation of JCO connection: System Already Exist

Hi Experts,
We have created the SLD connection to the ECC6.0 from the Portal 7.0.
Created one JCO connection using that SLD successfully for the Clinet 100.
Now we required to create one more JCO Connection for client200 also. But it is giving the Error that
System Already Exist.
How can we resolve this. When we create the JCO connection for one client, con't we create one more JCO connection for the same system for the differt client or not?
If so How do it?
Regards

I think you can add one more client in the existing connection. well, I am not sure about that even.
nikhil

Error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists"

Major headaches with copying files and folders between drives. I constantly (and I mean constantly) have to resort to copying files across in small batches (fewer than 10 works best) because anytime I try to copy lots of files and folders from my mac to an external hard drive (or from one external HD to a second external HD), I ALWAYS get the error message "The operation can't be completed because an item with the name .DS_Store already exists".
The files and folders are all Mac-generated, so hint or trace of foreign OSs in the mix.
All file types are susceptible
the HDs are all Mac OS X formatted, no foreign file formats involved
the HDs are all journal-enabled, OS X extended formats
have looked on here for previous posts, past suggestion was to disable creation of DS_Store files - not really a solution and realistically, defeats the purpose of their creation
any ideas anyone?
would appreciate any thoughts or sugestions, this has got me beat
the context is that I have a lot of image files that I am copying (trying to...) new external 3TB drives for backup and the job appears endless if I have to do this in batches of 10 or so..!
many thanks for any suggestions

This is definitively a nuisance. When copying large amounts of files between volumes try opening a terminal window and use use ditto. You need to type the directory paths of the source and the destination volume. When it starts ditto just coupes and optionally overwrites anything on the destination. You can get a verbose mode where it lists all activities.
gunnars-mac-mini-i7:Volumes gunnar$ man ditto
NAME
     ditto -- copy directory hierarchies, create and extract archives
SYNOPSIS
     ditto [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src ... dst_directory
     ditto [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_file dst_file
     ditto -c [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [-X] [<options>] src dst_archive
     ditto -x [-z | -j | -k] [-v] [-V] [<options>] src_archive ... dst_directory
     ditto -h | --help

FSCM-COL Business Partner Creation for Existing Customers

Experts-
After using MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT to create the initial load of Business Partners, there are a few Customers which are still missing Business Partners. Automatic Creation of Business Partners is set up and fully functioning for any new Customers created, however when attempting to use MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT for the existing Customers which are missing Business Partners the error message 'No transfer of interval for object BU_PARTNER' (Message no. NR028) is received.
If the Automatic Creation of Business Partners is working correctly at the time of Customer Master creation, what would prevent the Business Partner from being created after the Customer already exists?
Please let me know if further clarification is needed on what is outlined above.
Thanks and Regards,
Corey

In case someone runs into a similar issue in the future, the resolution to this issue is provided below:
In the case I've highlighted the customer had been created, yet the Business Partner failed to be created in the Automatic Business Partner Creation functionality initially due to a missed Tax Number Category configuration. Once this configuration was complete the BP still failed to create via XD02 or MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT. MDS_PPO2 gave the initial error message as 'Business partner ##1 does not exist' (Message no. R1201).
Although the Customer to BP synchronization setting were set up for an external number range, the presence of contact persons in the Customer Master record were causing SAP to look for grouping data. Since no grouping data was present SAP was attempting to create BPs contact persons using the internal number range, which was already set at its limit.
By removing the contact persons from the customer master via XD02 and then re-executing the MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT, the requested Business Partner was created. After that the contact persons were then re-maintained in the customer master.

Update Terminated change pointer ID already exists

Hi All,
While we are creating the article or purchase info record creation.
When I checked the SM13 i got this error.
Update was terminated
System ID.... RDP
Client....... 510
User..... PRASH
Transaction.. XK01
Update key... 4993DEF56A574020E1000000AC19005E
Generated.... 12.02.2009, 19:22:54
Completed.... 12.02.2009, 19:22:55
Error Info... B2 050: Change pointer ID already exists
Please suggest.
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Prashant,
Can you share with me, how you solve this problem? I'm encounter the same thing when using Tcode: FK02 to change master data, with same error message. Thanks.

ICO already exists in case same sender IDoc has to be used.

Hi,
I had a scenario where it used and IDoc as Sender (eg. XYZ.xyz) and a corresponding ICO was created. This is working absolutely fine. It is an IDoc to File scenario.
Now I wanted to create anothe scenario using the same sender IDoc. As creating an ICO with the sender interface mentioned gave an error that "ICO already exists". So I tried creating a service interface in which I gave the Request message as the IDoc. As expected on triggering IDoc , it is getting processed with ICO having sender interface as the IDoc and not the one I created.
Please help me out in this, multiple scenarios with same sender IDoc (Creation of ICOs).
Thanks & Regards,
Vikas Kumar Singh

Hello,
Use the same ICO with same IDOC as sender interface and channel
In the receiver tab multiple system and in the interface tab add multiple interfaces.
Now the same Idoc will be triggered to 2 interfaces

Source system is already exist

Hi,
We are facing an issue with source system creation.
we have already created the RFC connetions between BW & ECC and there is no issue in RFC.
while creating the source system in RSA1 it giving the error Source system is already exist.
But there is no entry for the source system in tables RSLOGSYSDEST & TBDLS.
Both sides systems are opened inSCC4 & SE06.
Please help me out on this issue.
Thanks
Aravinda

Are you sure it's saying the sourcesystem exist? Isn't it saying the connection 'XY' already exists? ('XY' may be formed by other letters).
You should check in the table RSBASIDOC in both BW and source system if you can see any entry already referring to the the logical name you are trying to create or the connection/TSPREFIX being used (the 'XY').

Add new product to already existing PPR ID through BAPI_PPR_MAINTAIN_40

Hi,
My requirement is to add new product to already existing PPR ID through the BAPI BAPI_PPR_MAINTAIN_40 but it is not working.
Normally at the time of creation we pass HANDLE and REF_HANDLE.
As in this case PPR ID already exist but adding new product, I am passing HANDLE and REF_GUID in place of REF_HANDLE.
INPUT_FIELDS also I am passing REF_GUID but it is not working.
Can anybody throw a light how this can be achieved to add new product through this BAPI?
It really helps.
Thanks in advance

Hi Joao,
Were you able to succeed in creating PPR programatically?
Please share your solution. Even I am unable to maintain input fields tab.

This entry already exists in the following tables -Message

Hi,
Im getting a [RDN1.WhsCode][line:3], 'This entry already exists in the following tables(ODBC-2035)'
This message is presented frequently in returns and credit memos. Our company uses batch numbers for our items. When the item is returned, is returned to a different warehouse from it was originally delivered, so we change the warehosue in the return form and credit memo form. So we need to click the "create" button in the batch selection window, because there are no batch numbers to be selected.
Any Ideas as how to solve the problem?
Thank you.

Hi,
This entry already exists in the following tables Message is always related to duplicated record creation or application error. For you case, I think it is better to return to original warehouse first and do inventory transfer to the actual return location in the second step.
Thanks,
Gordon

SG300 ACE Creation "Already Exists" ?????

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for