Shall we fix rendering order?

Hi all,
I am using one custom component inside UIComponent like the following way.
<h:inputText id="a" value="abc">
<myTld:myCustom/>
</h:inputText>
At the time of rendering:
<myTld:myCustom/> is rendering first and then <h:inputText/>.
I wanted in a reverse order.
i.e. <h:inputText/> should be first and then <myTld:myCustom/>.
Is there any way to achieve this.
Any help is highly appreciable.
Regards,
Ram

The inputText rendering mechanisme renders first the child and afterwards , the input text it self.
So do not encapsulate your component in the inputText but outside of it

Similar Messages

Error while creating a Fixed Price Order

Hi
I am creating a Fixed Price order for a customer which is created in the system.
However, while doing so I am getting an error message, "No Customer Master Record exists for sold-to-party XXXXXXXXX.
Please suggest.
Thanks,

hi
Check Table KNVV and KNVP, whether the customer is amintained or not.
Go to SPRO --> IMG --> Sales and Distribution --> Basic Settings --> Partner Determination --> Set up Partner Determination
Here u have to maintain procedure and its assignments, and then assign Procedure to the account group that you have created, and also maintain relevant partner functions to the account group created by you.
Also check whether the customer is maintained as SP or not
Check SP PATNER FUNCTION exist in your customer master or not.

Changing the component rendering order

Hi
I am using jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.0 and i have 3 task flows in my jspx page with one gloabal select one choice. When i change the selection in global select choice, all 3 taskflows need to refetch data and refresh. The task flows are added in the order of T1,T2, T3 in my jspx page.. If , at run time, i got to know that T1 takes 10 seconds, t2 takes 5 and t3 takes 2 seconds, then , can i change the rendering order to t3,t2, t1 programatically? Basically can i do addPartialTarget programatically to render the components in the order i wanted..
Thanks in advance

Hi,
you can't change the rendering order, but the refresh order as you pointed out.
Frank

Doubt abt "Fixing the Orders"

Hi,
I know an order can be fixed within therange of Planned Delivery Time + GR Processing Time ( Procurement Type : F).
My question is:
1. I need to fix an order which lies outside the range of Planned Delivery Time + GR Processing Time.I have an custom report for fixing an report.
2. I know available time of the order is compared with the Planned Delivery Time + GR Processing Time for fixing. When I debugged I saw there was a time stamp with the Planned Delivery Time + GR Processing Time.
So please let me know how the stamp time is calculated.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Siva.

The time stamp is calculated based on PPDS logic. While using time stamp in your development object, use the one that shows up in Product View as a reference. I am not sure the context you are referring to has PPDS implemented. If not them the standard PP strategies are probably used to calculate those time stamps.

Fixed Planned Orders cannot be changed anymore

Hello Experts,
we have seperated the fixed planned orders from the planned orders by creating a new category group which contains
only EE fixed, leaving EE unfixed in Category Group FP1.
We then assigned the fixed orders to a new KF. Now we have the issue that we cannot change the value of the fixed orders anymore. The new KF is automatically set as "no entry allowed". How can I change this and why is it automatically set to "output only" Keyfigure?
Thanks a lot for any ideas.
BR Julia

Here you go.
Create copy of standatrd category group CO8 - say ZO8 assign only category EE and fixed order qty only F.
This means this category group will have on EE fixed order.
Create one KF -lets say ZKF1 in SNP PA and assign KF category grp ZO8.
Now, import this KF in planning book and data view where user will fix the SNP planned order.
Make this KF invisible.
Write a macro to change the cell color of Planned order KF if ZKF1 value is more than Zero.
Hope this helps.
Let me know if you need further info.
Vipul

[svn] 4241: A collection of minor fixes for FXG transcoding to SWF: matrix attribute name correction; allowing for 0x prefix for hexadecimal colors; allowing for an id attribute on FXG nodes; fixing blur filter quality encoding; fixing the order in which

Revision: 4241
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-12-05 11:00:45 -0800 (Fri, 05 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
A collection of minor fixes for FXG transcoding to SWF: matrix attribute name correction; allowing for 0x prefix for hexadecimal colors; allowing for an id attribute on FXG nodes; fixing blur filter quality encoding; fixing the order in which bevel filter colors are encoding - the SWF specification appears to have the wrong order specified; updating SwfxPrinter to display a linestyle's fillstyle (if present).
Temporarily removing generated id attribute emitted in FXG to SWF optimization as this attribute is not present in the AS impl.
Also updating compiler error base types to allow a rootcause to be specified for additional detail to a compiler message exception.
QE: No
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Reviewer: Discussed compiler base error change with Paul.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/CompilerException.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/EmbedEvaluator.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/util/CompilerMessage.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/FXGConstants.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/AbstractFXGNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/dom/TextGraphicNode.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fxg/swf/AbstractFXGGraphics.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/TagDecoder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/TagEncoder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tools/SwfxPrinter.java

Fixing an order

Few days ago (06/06/2014) I placed an order, that was confirmed. After that, I did not receive any message.
Checking my order, I realized that the address I provided for shipping was wrong.
I am concerned about it and want to fix it.
{Removed per Forum Guidelines}

Hi aalbuquerque,
Thanks for registering and joining the forums! It’s completely understandable that you’d be concerned about your order if you provided an address that may be incorrect. While I thank you for choosing Best Buy for your electronics needs, I’m sorry that your recent purchase has rendered you worrisome. I’ll be more than happy to research this further and assist where I can.
In reviewing your order, I do see that the item has been delivered to the address that was input while the order was being placed. With that said, I’ll be sending you a private message with further information. To check your private messages, make sure you’re logged into your account and click the small envelope on the top right of the screen.
Thanks for sharing your concerns with us on the forums, and I’ll be reaching out to you shortly.
Sincerely,
Brian|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Component rendering order?

I have components, that depends one on another and so they are sensitive to the order they rendered in.
I have a dataTable, which gets data and sets paging properties in the backed bean.
The paging panelGroup should be rendered or not depending on value in the bean's properties, but what I get is that paging is rendered before dataTable get's value, so property in the bean are not defined yet.
How can I solve that?

May be you should change architecture of your application? Do you remeber about model-view-controller nature of JSF? dataTable is responsible for rendering the table and setting the state is not of its job. I think you should prepare all paging properties, state values, data etc in your backing bean first and then your UI components just render the view using this information from your backing bean.

Fixing photo order

Has anyone found a fix to make the iPad revert back to displaying photo order by date taken? I

There were other recent threads about the same thing within the last 2 weeks. Not sure where the matter stands.
For one poster who had a critical number of photos I recommended that she name them, for example, Monday 001, Monday 002, etc. It meant they were grouped together and in the correct order and this worked for her. This is OK if only a manageable number of photos are involved.
There are a number of programmes that allow you to rename photos by batch in a PC before syncing and this might be of interest to you. I would guess that in those circumstances they will remain in order when synced.
Hope this helps a little!

NO fixing SNP Orders

HI SNP Gurus!!
I would like not ot getting SNP fixed orders after heuristic execution, I mean, I need unfixed orders?
Does anybody know how can I do that?
Thanks in advance to everyone

Hi ,
Set SNP procuduction Horizon within this horizon SNP Heuristics plan Unfixed orders after that it will plan fixed order.
Mj

Fix process orders automatically

Hi Everyone,
In PPDS, after converting planned orders to process orders, we fix them manually. Is there a way to fix automatically? Thanks.
Mic

If you do not wish to make any more changes to the dates and resource assignment for an operation or order, or if you do not wish to make any further changes to the resource schedule for a specific time segment, you can fix the operation, order or (for certain time intervals) the resource.
Fixing operations or orders -
This function is available on the detailed scheduling planning board or in the production planning run. If you have fixed an operation or order on the DS planning board, the associated order acquires the status date fixed and PP firmed.
An operation or order with the status date fixed (and thus also PP firmed) is fixed for detailed scheduling and production planning. If you reset the fixing on the planning board, the date fixed status is reset. If the corresponding order also has the status output firmed or input firmed, the PP firming is retained.
Process fixing intervals with heuristic
You can also create, replace, or delete fixing intervals using the heuristic SAP_DS_03. In addition, you can specify in the heuristic settings that the operations lying within the fixing interval that is to be created are to be fixed when the heuristic is executed. As a result, the operations are protected not only from changes due to the detailed scheduling but also from possible changes made in an MRP run. After execution of the heuristic, the order has the status Date Fixed and PP-Firmed.

How do I fix song order on album?

I have the latest update on iTunes, 12.1.0.71 64-bit. I am on a PC, running Windows 7 Enterprise.
I was listening to songs on iTunes yesterday on my computer when suddenly the songs on one album went out of order. I have played multiple albums previously with no problems. The order changed right before my eyes. I have tried the following:
1. open and close iTunes
2. open Get Info and ensure the name of the band, album, disc #, and track order are correct, both by comparison and by changing the name and then changing it back to the correct information
When I look at it in Albums or Artists, it gives the songs in order of 2, 1, 3....the remainder of the songs appear to be in order. However, when I look at it under Songs, it shows one song (#2, the one out of place) to listed separately from the rest of the album. It seems iTunes recognizes the name of the album differently. For song #2, it recognizes the album starts with "A" and for the rest of the album, it skips the "A" and goes to "P" (the next word in the album name). I've tried changing the name and changing it back, but it still lists it out of order.
What am I doing wrong?

Generally setting a common Album title and Album Artist will fix things.
For deeper problems see Grouping tracks into albums, in particular see Tried that, there are STILL too many covers! and also check for consistent use of disc numbers.
tt2

Apple please fix Playlist order!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I have audio books that are not playing in order and this is a real pain in the you know what. Please apple fix this issue soon!
thx,
-Brian
17" Mac Book Pro 2.33Ghz C2D 2GB RAM 160GB HD Mac OS X (10.4.9) this is our 7th mac {•¿•}

I second this request. In addition to the selection criteria in of a Smart Playlist, could Apple also include the ability to specify the Sort Order of the new playlist, or no sort at all (if the new list is based on another list).
Brad

Fixed Purchase Order quantity with manual PO creation??

Hi,
Is there any way to define a fixed PO quantity on the inforecord or the material master and have SAP automatically insert this quantity on the PO. I know it is possible to have SAP determine the vendor from e.g. a quota arrangement set-up and have this inserted automatically, when source determination is flagged, but how about the PO quantity.
Note that we do not use SAP for MRP planning, so we create a manual PO and enters all data on the PO manually including the PO quantity, but I assume there must be a way to have this quantity inserted automatically if it is maintained on the info record or material master. However if I enter a fixed quantity on either one of these it seems that it only works in relation to MRP planning, where SAP will then account for the fixed quantity.
br,
Jannik

Best to achieve this is to use the copy functionality. Advise your users to create POs by copying from existing POs. This will ensure that the PO quantity is copied also, then the users can change whatever needs to be changed.

JSF component processing and rendering order

Hi,
I have a request level managed bean that has two list boxes on it.
The first is always displayed, and the second should only ever be displayed when the first one has had a value selected in it.
So, I use something like this:
<h:selectOneListbox styleClass="selectOneListbox" value="#{moveBean.sourceListIndex}" size="1" onchange="javascript:submit();" >
    <f:selectItems value="#{moveBean.sourceLists}" />
</h:selectOneListbox>
<h:selectOneListbox styleClass="selectOneListbox" value="#{moveBean.destinationListIndex}" size="1" onchange="javascript:submit();" rendered="#{moveBean.sourceListIndex != null}">
    <f:selectItems value="#{moveBean.destinationLists}" />
</h:selectOneListbox>                                The second list is correctly only ever displayed when the first one has been selected.
However, the value of the second list ("#{moveBean.destinationListIndex}") is never applied.
Given that this is essentially a request mode operation, I'm loathe to make it into a session bean, but I'm not faced with too many options.
Help!
Suggestions?
-Chris

You have four options:
1) Make it a session bean.I did half of this. It was the value of the selects that I moved to a session object and kept the getting of the values of the list boxes to a request scope.
<h:selectOneListbox styleClass="selectOneListbox" value="#{sessionObject.sourceListIndex}" size="1" onchange="javascript:submit();">
    <f:selectItems value="#{databaseBean.sourceLists}" />
</h:selectOneListbox>The databaseBean is the request scoped object. This has worked for me in this instance.
2) Put the data to be stored in session in
context.getExternalContext().getSesisonMap().
3) Put the data to be transferred from page to page
in h:inputHidden.
4) Use componentbindings.How would this solve the problem? An example, please.

Shall we fix rendering order?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for