Shipping notification and PO outstanding qty in ATP check

Hi all,
I have the following situation: intercompany purchase order process with confirmation control key (including outbound and inbound delivery). In my ATP check I have included purchase orders and shipping notifications. This has as consequence that after the outbound delivery is created and outstanding quantity remains open in the PO (due to the nature of our business), this will disappear when the PO is received. However, while this qty is open, it could be taken into account as available to promise and it can lead to unreal sales order confirmations.
Does anyone know if there's a way to eliminate this outstanding qty without changing the PO qty and keeping PO's and shipping notifications in the ATP check.
Thanks in advance.
JC Garita

Dear KANTH,
Documents without order number in ATP  are always temporary quantity assignments (TQAs). If the order number was known at the time of running the ATP check, the TQA carries the order number, otherwise it carries e.g. <unknown>. The TQA carries order number <unknown> until either the item is converted or a new ATP check is executed.     
Please also have a look at the note 488725 mainly points 4.,5. and 8.                                                                               
You can delete the old assignements with the report /SAPAPO/om_delta_remove_older (via SE38).                              
Alternatively you can delete the TQA's manually. Use transaction /SAPAPO/AC06., just delete the user and generation date and execute.                                                                               
The system behaviour should be fine after the deletion of the hanging  TQA's.                                                                 
Regards,
Tibor

Similar Messages

  • ASN (Advance shipping notification)and Inbound deliveries

    Gurus,
    In our secenario we want to use the functionality of Advance shipping notifications from our vendors through EDI/IDOC, where exactly in the PO screen does the notification number resides and how does this trigger inbound delivery, meaning whether we should still be using VL31n/VL34? Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Hi
    The ASN from vendor in form of EDI will be converted into IDoc in SAP and it should trigger VL31N and pass the data.Once Inbound delivery created thru IDoc same will be updated in PO line item details-> Confirmation tab.
    You should develop an interface(Program) to convert EDI file from vendor
    (normally XML file will converted into IDoc) into Inbound delivery.
    regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Inbound delivery and shipping notification

    Hi,
    what is the difference between shipping notification and inbound delivery in confirmations tab of POs?
    Regards

    Hello SAP Friend,,,
    IT is nothing but the ASN from Vendor maintained in PO ,
    Inbound delivery is done by using VL31n Transaction after receving an update from Vendor about the shipping details of material,Quantity,date etc.
    You can specify the deadline for receipt of confirmations for each confirmation category in Customizing for Purchasing (Confirmations, Set up confirmation control under Confirmation sequence.)
    You can specify in Customizing that you wish to see the following in the monitoring list, for example:
    - Which order acknowledgments have still not been received a certain number of days after the PO date
    - Which shipping notifications have still not been received a certain number of days before the delivery date
    Arshad
    Edited by: arshad ahmed on Apr 28, 2009 12:09 PM

  • Designing EDI Interfaces for Advance Shipment Notification and POD

    Our client does not engage in manufacturing and distribution of its products and components. They have developed partnerships with companies who provide distribution, manufacturing, shipping and movement services. They have authorized Forwarding Agents to transport the shipment. However, our client monitors and controls the business operations and remains the final authority in decision making.
    The distribution company does the actual delivery and sends our client shipment confirmation (EDI-856). A single IDOC (SHPCON) comes in and performs the following functions
       Update the delivery document (set picking value based on what shipped)
       Generate a shipment document (with Handling Unit Information)
        Post Goods Issue
    We are facing performance issue with this kind of setup and the remedy suggested is to have multiple IDOC types to come in and create the shipment document and do the PGI separately.
    I would like to hear experiences from practitioners on how they designed this requirement with other clients

    Hi Prabhahar,
    Try in this transaction NACE.
    Select V2 for Shipping.  And click output types.
    Select LALE (Shipping Notification to Sold-to-party) or LAVA (Outgoing Shipping Notification) and use the Program RSNASTED for EDI processing and customize with the help of ABAPer.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Augustine Ponraj

  • ATP check and Check against preliminary planning for prod order

    Hi
        For same material, order type and plant for some orders ATP check is happening and for some orders Check against preliminary planning is happening.I want to know why its happening.
    Regards,
    PradeepM.

    Pradeep,
    What types of orders?  Do you mean SD orders?
    ATP check is defaulted 'on' or 'not on' by the MRP Strategy(OPPS, look for "availability check").  MRP strategy is in turn determined by the MRP strategy group in the plant-level material master.  Assuming, then, that your MRP strategy group contains only one MRP strategy (this is common), then the default check will be set by MRP strategy group.
    ATP check can subsequently be turned on/off other ways in SD, leaving you with either no ATP, or possibly an Availability check against planning.
    So, if you are talking about sales orders, and not PP orders, the most likely place for 'turning off'' the ATP check is with the schedule line category.  A close second culprit is with the requirements class of the SO item.  SD configuration will determine the default requirements type, requirements class, and the default Schedule line category.  Study the sales orders in question in VA03.  Specifically look at the requirements type (procurement tab of SO Item) and the Schedule line category (goto-item-schedule lines).  Then, look at the configuration for
    Schedule line category: OVZ8
    Mapping of requirements type to requirements class :  OVZH
    Requirements class:  OVZ0
    Look at the setting for 'AvC'.  If it is 'on', you will get ATP against product.  If it is off, you will get either an ATP against planning, or no ATP at all.
    If you wish to change the determination of the Requirements type, or the determination of the Schedule line category in SD, you should probably discuss with your local SD functional expert.  A small change here can have many unintended consequences.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • How to ATP check when sold to party in sales order is changed?..

    Dear SD Gurus,
       I have one issue with ATP check in my current project where I need to change the the Sold to party of the sales order for a valid business case. We are using production allocation method for ATP check which reduces the Open PA qty once the sales order is saved.
    In the above scenario, once the Sold to party in sales order is changed, it redetermines everything and also goes through a ATP check which is cusing as an issue as it would again reduce the open PA qty for the same items in sales order for which are already taken into account. It would either reduce the open qty or propose the next date if it is no more available on that day.
    This is a big issue for us. Also it deleted the texts that are maintained.
    Does anyone know how to stop the ATP check in this (main issue) and also if possilble stop the deleteion of texts?
    Thank you very much for your help in advance..
    BR/
    Ashutosh

    Hello SAJU,
      The ATP check is done automatically when sold to party is changed..the issue is how to stop it? beacause of production allocation , it would be incorrect to reduce the open PA qty once more for the sales order when sold to party is changed. So I would like to stop it. Is there any exit or paramater by which we can stop ATP check?
    Thanks for your reply..
    BR/
    Ashutosh

  • Time bound ATP check

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement wherein we need to do ATP check for orders having a material availability date of say 4 days and shouldn't do the ATP check for orders having material availability date lying  after 4 days.
    Can we do time bound ATP check .Any inputs on how we can achieve this.
    Thank you
    Abhay.

    Hi Ron,
    That would not be possible in standard solution
    You can check if this could work for
    you: in ECC maintain Planned delivery time + In-house Production time  = Total Repl.lead time in P1 ( that is your P3->p1).
    In APO “maintain Check control” – Confirmation at Checking horizon
    CIF the master data, check if you have
    the checking horizon (TRLT) populated in APO Product master (ATP TAB).
    Maintain the Checking horizon calendar
    – create a calendar and assign it to your location master ( calendar tab and
    Shipping calendar) this will be automatically populated in the checking horizon
    calendar field in ATP Tab.
    Now when a sales order is entered, the
    order will be confirmed at the checking horizon.
    The negative side of it is that , all
    the sales orders will be confirmed at the checking horizon.
    Or
    You can develop a program where you
    can feed in the screen ( from – To)  P3 to P2 and P2 to P1 ( it
    will search in the T lane and give the output as P3 to p1 after adding ) and
    store this output in a Z Table , you need to modify the code to check this Z
    Table to read the transportation time. Need to check on the performance
    or will check if other experts has any other suggestions.

  • ATP Check(in SCM ) for a Configurable product  during sales order creation.

    HI Guru's,
        our client is implementing GATP(SCM) and Variant Config(ECC 6.0)
    when a Sales order is created for a Configurable Product of 20" width and 10" diameter, and with some other Characteristics, He wants the ATP check to be done for that particular product with specific width and diameter.
    Is there any possible solution?
    Plz let me know....  
    Thanks
    jk

    Hi
    Assuming that you know how to configure Variant configuration in R/3, ATP check in R/3 I will list down the ATP set up and setup relevant to Variant Configuration in SCM.
    APO side.
    1.Check Definition of Characteristics and Class system:
    SAP APO - Implementation Guide -> SAP Advanced Planner and Optimizer (SAP APO) -> Basis Settings -> Define Class System (CDP or Classical Characteristics)
    2. Check Mode ( use same requirements class used in R/3 mat master)
    SAP APO - Implementation Guide -> SAP Advanced Planner and Optimizer (SAP APO) -> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP Check) -> General Settings -> Maintain Check Mode
    3. Create a check instruction with your check mode and AE(make to stock SD order) combination and set up the desired ATP check method in it.
    SAP APO - Implementation Guide -> SAP Advanced Planner and Optimizer (SAP APO) -> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP Check) -> General Settings -> Maintain Check Instructions
    4. Check Control with your ATP group and AE business event.
    SAP APO - Implementation Guide -> SAP Advanced Planner and Optimizer (SAP APO) -> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP Check) -> Product Availability Check -> Maintain Check Control
    5.Maintain suitable scheduling horizon in SAP APO - Implementation Guide -> SAP Advanced Planner and Optimizer (SAP APO) -> Supply Chain Planning -> Production Planning and Detailed Scheduling (PP/DS) -> Global Settings -> Maintain Global Parameters and Defaults -> Planning Tab
    5. Don't forget to CIF classes and charecteristics
    6. Maintain check mode, ATP group, PP/DS horizon, planning procedure 3 in product master.
    If you want to trigger production you have to maintain planning procedure 5  in product master and appropriate settings for MATP like configure check instructions, production type Mutli level ATP. you have to have valid BOM and Routings, CIF PDS for the material, maintain production version in material master, etc. That will be quite a complex scenario again.
    This should give you proper results. Hope this helps.
    regards
    Mohan V R chunchu
    Edited by: Mohan V R Chunchu on Jan 30, 2008 6:17 AM

  • ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales document

    Hi,
    System 4.70
    Is it possible to carry out an ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales documents.
    I have written a bespoke program and the program requires an ATP check to be performed for each material and sales document, I am currently using BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY which is bringing back the necessary information but it's a bit slow.
    Does any one have any ideas please.
    Regards
    J-J

    The ATP Check using the BAPI is done per material and plant. If you're looping through sales documents and then materials you're probably doing the ATP check for the same material over and over again.
    Just get the list of materials you need and the corresponding plants and call the BAPI for each of them.
    Also do a run-time analysis (tcode SE30) to check exactly what slows down your program.
    regards.

  • ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

    Good morning,
    I have a question regarding the ATP.
    If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
    When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
    Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
    Thanks in advance.
    ATP novice :o)

    Hi Guy Hall,
    Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for  checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

    Hi All,
    While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
    But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
    I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
    Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Navaneeth

    Hi All,
    Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
    Regards,
    Navaneeth

  • ATP Check - Purchase Order Option Includes Qty on Inbound Delivery

    We are on ECC 6.0 and we recently turned on purchase orders in our ATP check (and turned off replenishment lead time).  We have PO's turned on just we can see the PO due date from the ATP proposal screen, not to actually confirm against that PO qty. 
    What we have found is that as soon as an inbound delivery is created for that PO, it considers that material to be available and automatically confirms the qty.  When you look at ATP quantities, the inbound delivery is showing as a shipping notification.  What's puzzling to me is that there is a totally seperate option in the checking rule for shipping notifications.
    We have found a temporary workaround, but I am just trying to understand if this is a bug or if this is the way that SAP intended for it to work... just so I know which way to pursue this.  Thanks.
    MM

    Hi,
    In T.code OVZ9, for your availability checking rule and Availability check combination, you need to select value X or A, in the field Incl. release order requirements.
    Regards,

  • PO as well as its shipping notification show up on MD04.

    Hello friends,
    I have a PO for qty = 2.  There are 2 shipping notifications for qty = 1 each (PO history tab also show the same).   With these Shipping Notifications, we expect the PO to be removed from MRP-List/MD04.   However, both the Txn show PO with qty = 1 as balance (and hence total receipt qty = 3).   Any suggestions as to what is going wrong here ?
    Thanks,
    - Chetan

    For Honme Button try:
    http://snapguide.com/guides/calibrate-your-home-button/?utm_expid=69945963-15
    fix for Home button
    iPhone Home Button Not Working or Unresponsive? Try This Fix
    - you can turn on Assistive Touch it add the Home and other buttons to the iPods screen. Settings>General>Accessibility>Assistive Touch
    - If not under warranty Apple will exchange your iPod for a refurbished one for:
    Apple - Support - iPod - Repair pricing
    You can do it an an Apple store by:
    Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar
    or sent it in to Apple. See:
    Apple - Support - iPod - Service FAQ
    - There are third-party places like the following that will repair the Home button. Google for more.
    iPhone Repair, Service & Parts: iPod Touch, iPad, MacBook Pro Screens
    You can live with the existing battery life or
    Apple will exchange your iPod for a refurbished one for this price. They do not fix yours.
    Apple - iPod Repair price                       
    A third-party place like the following maybe less. Google for more.
    iPhone Repair, Service & Parts: iPod Touch, iPad, MacBook Pro Screens
    Replace the battery ourself if you are up to it
    iPod Touch Repair – iFixit                  

  • PO Confirmation Vs Shipping Notification

    Hi
    PO Confirmation Vs Shipping Notification  what are the basic differeces ?

    Confirmation will give the quantity adn delivery date information rahte shipping notification will geive the quantity, date as well as the inbound delivery you can create and you can also make GR agianst the Inbound delivery
    so suppose you have 1000 qty PO and you going to receive in partial and you want to post the GR/IR against the exact qty than use Shipping notification so you can create inbound delivery and receive against ID

  • How to deleted the shipping notification record in the MD04

    Hello Expert,
    We have a very strange things here.
    We have a Schedule agreement which need confirmation control for good receipt - means we need inbound delivery for the good receipt.
    1. We have 20k open qty for delivery in the schedule line of the SA.
    2. An we create an inbound delivery with reference to this SA with delivery qty 20k,
    3. but when user discover that there is only 15k stock ready for good receipt, then he want to delete the inbound delivery and create a new one again.
    4. user use an customized program to delete the inbound delivery, but there is some problem in this program, the inbound delivery was deleted successfully, but we found this shipping notification still existing in MD04 view.
    5. And we double check confirmation overview in the schdule line for this item, we still found this inbound delivery existing in the list.
    6. Then we try to use VL31N to create the inbound delivery with reference to this SA again, it is showing no stock for this material for good receipt as we don't have any open delivery qty for receipt. The existing 20k stock still waiting for good receipt although the inbound delivery was deleted.
    Is there any method we can deleted this shipping notification in the MD04 and the entry with 20k in the confirmation overview of the SA?
    Thank you very much for your help.

    Hi shiva,
    Thanks for your program, I ran this program, but it can find nothing.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Regeneration of Sales and Delivery Requirements
    ATTENTION: Only simulation
    Simulation Only
      List contains no data
    Deleted Records in Total:    0 Single    0 Collective
    Generated Records in Total:    0 Single    0 Collective
    Total Elapsed Time:  119 ms
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Please advice,

Maybe you are looking for

  • To be able to report by business area at a header level

    Business area reporting at a header level in Procurement/AP Subject Areas At present client is doing a large number of manual lookups in Excel to add Business area detail to certain OBI procurement reports. Reasons for why we are having to do this in

  • Labels in ovs

    HI iam impleneting OVS functonality, my problem is when i open the ovs in input field, i can able to open a popup window with some default lables ,input field and a table below that, my question is that how can i change the default labels provided th

  • Bluetooth printing on iP100

    I am testing the ability of using a Bluetooth connection for printing purposes in an office environment.  I have an iP100 printer connected to a Windows 7 64-bit laptop via a bluetooth connection. When I print a document, I only get half of the docum

  • In OB29 which box should I flag on if I want to select my fiscal variant N6

    Hello, On BW side I want to select my fiscal year varaint as N6, so I go to tcode OB29 and which cloumn should i flag on the first one or second (year dependent or calendar year) right now none of that boxes are selected. ? The calendar year cloumn h

  • Why is i-tunes nolonger recognising my iphone 3gs?

    Midway through updating my iphone (it completed the first stage), iTunes stopped.  Now my iphone is unusable and its screen permanently shows an image of a USB cable and iTunes icon - it shows this when plugged in to iTunes but iTunes nolonger recogn