Skinny Protocol Versions

Hi,
Does anyone know how to find what version of the Skinny protocol are used in the different firmwares on 79XX handsets.
Rgds Andy

Andy,
This is the best I could find internally:
SCCP Version
Third-Gen Phone Load
5.0
v8
8.0.1
5.1
v8
8.2.1
6.0
v12
8.3.1
6.1.1
v12
8.3.x (new phone load not required)
6.1.2
v15
8.3.4
7.0
v17
8.4.1
8.0
V19
9.0.2
8.5
V20
9.1.1
Note that the phone load is the first build that had the features for  the CCM, it's not the only firmware that works or ships with the CCM
Hope this helps!
-Brett

Similar Messages

  • Transport protocol version error in Integration Directory API

    Hi All,
    I am trying to create SOAP receiver communication channel using Java-only PI 7.31 directory APIs. I have passed all the required parameters to the CommunicationChannelIn service, but it's throwing error - "Enter at least one object key for operation 'create'".
    When I tried to test the service through WS Navigator, it's giving exception - "Enter a value for attribute 'Transport Protocol Version'" which doesn't exists in case of SOAP adapter creation.
    Has anybody come across this issue? If the adapter metadata does not specify any transport protocol version, then shouldn’t the validation checks in  CommunicationChannelIn service provider proceed without errors on a blank value for this attribute?
    Note: I have gone through all the SCN blogs, discussion threads we have on topics related to Integration Directory API.
    Thanks in advance for all the help and suggestions.
    Regards,
    Yashu Vyas

    Hi All,
    I am trying to create SOAP receiver communication channel using Java-only PI 7.31 directory APIs. I have passed all the required parameters to the CommunicationChannelIn service, but it's throwing error - "Enter at least one object key for operation 'create'".
    When I tried to test the service through WS Navigator, it's giving exception - "Enter a value for attribute 'Transport Protocol Version'" which doesn't exists in case of SOAP adapter creation.
    Has anybody come across this issue? If the adapter metadata does not specify any transport protocol version, then shouldn’t the validation checks in  CommunicationChannelIn service provider proceed without errors on a blank value for this attribute?
    Note: I have gone through all the SCN blogs, discussion threads we have on topics related to Integration Directory API.
    Thanks in advance for all the help and suggestions.
    Regards,
    Yashu Vyas

  • Question about ssh login warning: Bad protocol version identification

    I set up ssh on my computer according to Tim Haigh's suggestions given here:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1674968&tstart=0
    But when I log in from my iPhone, secure.log shows this:
    sshd[534]: Bad protocol version identification 'GET / HTTP/1.1' from 208.54.83.51
    Although I do log in successfully, how can I resolve this error?

    GET / HTTP/1.1
    Looks more like a Web browser handshake, than ssh.

  • Incompatible protocol versions

    I am attempting to run an iphone application on an iphone 4.3 simulator. I have confirmed that I can talk to the Unwired Server by seeing that my client is contacting the server in the logs. However, I am getting the following message in the xcode console:
    [INFO] [CallbackHandler.m:46] =============================
    [ERROR] [CallbackHandler.m:47] Message Exception
    [ERROR] [CallbackHandler.m:48] SUPPersistenceException: Device and server are not using compatible protocol versions: client protocol version = 1, server protocol version = -1.
    [INFO] [CallbackHandler.m:49] =============================
    I saw a similar question regarding this in the context of a blackberry app in the forums, but the error was a bit different and the solution (simply resetting the simulator) did not work for me. Has anyone encountered this issue before? If so can you explain what is going on here and how you got past it?
    Thanks!
    Jesse

    Please check the MBO deployed in the server is same as what you were using in the client side development.
    Regards,
    Ram

  • The vm and host networking components failed to negotiate protocol version '4.0'

    Hi,
    I have the problem that when I start a VM with windows server 2012 on a hyper-v v2 host, it takes very long till the VM get bind the static or dynamic ip adress. I tried both, static and dynamic. In every case I see at the event viewer the following error:
    the vm and host networking components failed to negotiate protocol version '4.0'
    After a few minutes the VM gets bind the IP an everything works fine. But at the next time I reboot the machine the same failure appear.
    Trying to use legacy network adapter results in the same problem. After this I tried to export the vm to a hyper-v v3 host. At first boot time
    the problem didn't appear and the vm get's bind the ip adress without problems. Then after upgrading the integration services to hyper-v v3
    version the same problem appears but without register it in the event viewer.
    Does anybody know how I can fix this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Marcus

    Hi,
    A MS KB records an issue when you run Windows 8 or Windows Server 2012 based Virtual machine in Windows Server 2008 or in Windows Server 2008R2:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2744129
    There is a Microsoft update in this KB, you may install this KB in your Windows Server 2008 R2 and check the result.
    While about this issue after you migrate the guest VM to Windows Server 2012 host, will it still has such error message after you remove all network adapters of the guest VM?
    Install Windows update for the Hyper-V host, after that upgrade Integration service for the guest VM again to check the result.
    For more information please refer to following MS articles:
    "Unsupported configuration" warning when you run a Windows 8-based or Windows Server 2012-based virtual machine in Windows Server 2008 R2
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2737297
    Hyper-V Overview
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831531.aspx
    Lawrence
    TechNet Community Support

  • Which protocol version is really used?

    In the JSSE reference guide, Appendix A: Standard Names, is said, that the protocol name passed to the getInstance method of the SSLContext class maybe one of the following: SSL, SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS, TLSv1. But it does not specify which protocol version will actually be used, it is always said that it supports one or some specific protocols, but it may support other protocol versions as well.
    And what does the setEnabledProtocols method of the SSLSocket class do? May an application specify here exactly, which protocols should be used?

    JSSE currently supports SSL v3.0 and TLS v1.0 (SSL v3.1).
    The protocol agreeded with the server depends on your client/server configuration, and always is the lower protocol supported by both of them.
    For example:
    Server -> TLS v1.0
    Client -> SSL v3.0
    The shared protocol will be SSL v3.0.
    About the getEnabledProtocols() method, give a look here:
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/security/jsse/JSSERefGuide.html#NewMethods
    Hope this helps.

  • The VM and host networking components failed to negotiate protocol version '5.0'

    I have been searching for a fix for this issue for sometime.
    The VM and host networking components failed to negotiate protocol version '5.0'
    and
    The VM and host networking components failed to negotiate protocol version '4.0'
    this error have been posting on the host server 2008 R2, with a hyper-V running server 2012 R2, which is the eval version vhd from Microsoft.
    I have tried the patch on the server 2008 R2 host and the nic delete and rescan option with varied reboots and such between each step of the process just to try every possible combination.
    The error persists. Are there any other suggested solutions for fixing this problem. Also the drivers have all been updated along with the system firmware.
    thanks,

    The hotfix states Server 2012 in the VM. You stated Server 2012 R2 in the VM.  MSFT is very precise in this language - Server 2012 != Server 2012 R2.
    Two distinctly different releases of Windows Server.
    In this case the N = the running release of Hyper-V.  In this case your Hyper-V Server at release version 2008 R2.
    The +2 = the current version of Windows.  In this case that is 2012 R2.  Two releases ahead of the version of the hypervisor you are running.
    I tossed in the link to Ben Armstrong's blog article as that is the ONLY (and still definitive statement) support statement regarding this configuration.  He posted that article at my request after many folks posting in this forum with strange behavior
    in this configuration.
    "supported" in this context means that if you call CSS, you will be told the following: 'yes, you have errors in the event log.  We will not fix that.  This is an unsupported configuration.  But that does not block the OS in the
    VM running.  If you want the errors to go away, we suggest you upgrade your Hyper-V Server to 2012 R2.  That configuration is supported.'
    That said, it can impact other functionality of the VM that rely on Integration Components in the VM and the Services of the hypervisor.  There is most likely small things that will not work.
    Brian Ehlert
    http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
    Learn. Apply. Repeat.

  • Is HLS protocol version 6 is supported in IOS 6.x and IOS 7.x ?

    Is the latest HLS protocol version (version 6) is supported in IOS 6.x and IOS 7.x players ?
    If it is supported can you please provide a sample m3u8 with EXT-X-START tag ?

    I use native player and start play from web page in Safari
    Master playlist
    #EXTM3U
    #EXT-X-MEDIA:TYPE=SUBTITLES,GROUP-ID="WebVTT",NAME="Main",DEFAULT=NO,AUTOSELECT= NO,URI="http://172.18.0.81:8080/mediaserver/download/2/service.523/item.m3u8?playlist=we bvtt"
    #EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=16777216,SUBTITLES="WebVTT"
    http://172.18.0.81:8080/mediaserver/download/2/service.523/item.m3u8?playlist=da ta
    segmets playlist
    #EXTM3U
    #EXT-X-VERSION:4
    #EXT-X-TARGETDURATION:1
    #EXT-X-MEDIA-SEQUENCE:2280
    #EXT-X-ALLOW-CACHE:NO
    #EXTINF:1
    http://172.18.0.81:8080/mediaserver/download/2/service.523/item.ts?chunk=1
    #EXTINF:1
    http://172.18.0.81:8080/mediaserver/download/2/service.523/item.ts?chunk=2
    #EXTINF:1
    http://172.18.0.81:8080/mediaserver/download/2/service.523/item.ts?chunk=3

  • OCI/UPI Protocol Versions

    Hi,
    I need to know what OCI/UPI Protocol Versions my Application uses. Where can i see that? Who helps me ?
    Thanks

    Please reread your post with the following questions in mind:
    1. What application are you talking about? Does it have a name?
    2. Does this have anything to do with Oracle the database? If so describe how?
    3. What version of Oracle, the database, to a minimum of 3 decimal places?
    4. Why do you need this information? What is the purpose?

  • Protocol version of IEEE 802.1x

    Hi,Sir.
    I ask question of dot1x's protocol version.
    I want to configure version 1 of IEEE802.1x.
    But, defaut version is 2 from IOS 12.2(25)SEE.
    Could you tell me, how to configure for version 1 fo IEEE 802.1x.
    (I use WS-C2950G-48TC-L)
    Ryusuke

    Hi,
    Our network is design for version 1 of IEEE 802.1X.
    We have some Catalyst switch.
    WS-C2970G-24TS-E
    WS-C3560G-48TS-S
    These are running IOS at 12.2(25)SEC.
    (This protocol version of IEEE 802.1X is 1)
    I can't anthenticate when WS-C2960G-48TC-L is running IOS 12.2(40)SE.
    (This protocol viersion of IEEE 802.1X is 2)
    I can't authenticate when WS-C3560G-48TS-S is running IOS at 12.2(40)SE.
    But I can authenticate when WS-C3560G-48TS-S is running IOS at 12.2(25)SEC.
    (These are same configuration)
    I think this problem is version 2 of IEEE 802.1X.
    (My configuration for version 1 of IEEE 802.1X)
    I want to resolve this problem.
    Best regards.
    Ryusuke.

  • Cisco IDS 4250XL - SSH protocol versions supported

    I recently had a vulnerability scan completed and "SSH protocol versions supported" showed up in it for my IDS. Has anyone come across this and if so, how am I able to mitigate it. Is there a way to change the SSH version on the device?

    What vulnerability is being asserted in the OpenSSH implementation of SSH protocol version 1?
    I have not seen a new problem discovered in more than three years in the SSH protocol version 1. OpenSSH-3.7.1p2 contains all the fixes for all vulnerabilities that I am aware.
    When a vulnerability assessment recommends shutting down SSH protocol version 1, they need to back it up with some facts to show that SSH1 as implemented in the IDS 4.x sensor is insecure.
    =====
    That having been said, you can disable SSH protocol version 1 by editing /etc/ssh/sshd_config and restarting the service. What you will lose is the ability to manage keys in the IDS CLI. So you cannot use authorized keys to log into the sensor.
    The "copy scp:..." and "upgrade scp:..." commands will fail. When you start an SSH2 client, it will refuse to connect to the remote server because it won't trust the host key.
    You also won't be able to manange network devices to perform blocking using the SSH protocol.

  • Retrieve HTTP Protocol version from HttpServletResponse

    Hi,
    I need to set different headers in my HttpServletResponse using filter. Values of headers depend on version of HTTP - 1.0 or 1.1, thus I need to check the response's protocol version and add different headers to my response.
    For now I can see using external tool that each my request is HTTP 1.0 and each response is HTTP 1.1. How can I retrieve protocol version from response in my Filter?
    I cannot use protocol version from request, because as I said request and response have different versions of HTTP somehow.
    So how can I retrieve protocol version from HttpServletResponse?
    Thanks in advance.

    You need to read the Sun J2EE tutorial on filters. One of the things you will find is that you can not directl access and change the ServletOutputStream of the response object. You need to write a wrapper around the response object that contains you own output stream. Then you can read the data in this stream, parse it looking for the HTTP protocol version and add your additional headers. You then write the new data to the original ServletOutputStream of the response object which gets sent to the browser.
    I beleive there is an example of this in the tutorial. There are also examples available on the web and on this forum.

  • Live Migration - Failed to establish a connection because of an unsupported protocol version (protocol version 5.0)

    I'm getting a not the disk and everything) back to the host I originally had it on.  Here is my setup:
    Host 1 - Microsoft Storage Server 2012 Standard (NAS)
    Host 2 - Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 (All connected virtual hard drives use the SMB 3.0 protocol to connect to the NAS - Host 1)
    Delegation is setup on both of these hosts to include:
    -Trust this computer, Use Kerberos only, Services - cifs, Hyper-V Replication, Microsoft Virtual Console Service, Microsoft Virtual System Migration Service
    Live Migration is setup on both of these hosts to include:
    -Enable incoming and outgoing live migrations using Kerberos
    -Use any available network for live migration
    I was able to migrate the VM from host 1 to host 2 with no problems.  But when I try to migrate the VM host 1 that's when I encounter the error. 
    I saw a KB article similar to the issue I'm having but it only effects Server 2008 R2 (KB2705759)
    I've rebooted both hosts but still get the error.  The VM that is on host 2 has it's hard drive on host 1 run's fine so there are no connection issues there. 
    I've searched the Internet for this issue and keep coming up empty handed.  I even named the virtual switch on both hosts the same to see if that would work.  Please help!  I'd rather not do an export and import of the VM because I'm evaluating
    this product so I want to make sure it works before I put it into production. 

    Hi PPlbrad,
    Agree with Shabarinath .
    We can just live migration the VM from low version (2012) to high version (2012R2) but the reverse is not ture .
    So do hyper-v replica (just for updating )
    Best Regards
    Elton JI
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • SMB Protocol Version on Zfs

    Hi,
    It's seens that smb shares created with zfs share command are using smb 1.0; after some wireshark on Windows Machines, the protocol used is smb not smb2.
    On previous versions, I could set this on /etc/samba/smb.conf (max protocol = SMB2). "- The Oracle Solaris 11 OS introduces a new method for sharing and managing SMB and NFS shares. The zfs command has been enhanced to manage shares and share properties on Solaris ZFS file systems. The zfs command now supports SMB and NFS sharing by means of the share, sharesmb, and sharenfs properties"
    Is there a way to force zfs smb shares to exported on smb2?
    Regards
    M

    cindys wrote:
    My very limited view is that if you create an SMB share of a Solaris ZFS file system, then the share should be available on Windows system running SMB or SM2. SMB and SM2 should interoperate, like different versions of NFS do. What is the actually problem?
    Thanks, CindyHi Cindy,
    I am able to connect to the shares.
    Windows Client can mount the share and after some time:
    Exception message: Failed to start monitoring changes to '\\sol11-zfs-01\mypool-fs0001\076\home' because the network BIOS command limit has been reached.
    I've created a linux box with smb2 and this error won't occour (samething happens on smb1-linux). I am not sure which feature exactly fixes this error.
    Using a cmdlet on win2012,
    PS C:\Windows\system32> Get-SmbConnection
    ServerName ShareName UserName Credential Dialect NumOpens
    10.133.24.23 pool server\user server\uh-user 1.50 2
    Dialect is 1.5.

  • What is the latest IMA protocol version running on a 3640 with IOS version 12.0(7)T

    I am having problems with a 3640 router running IMA to a Nortel Passport 15000. I need to verify that the 3640 is running IMA version 1.0

    Actually, the specification depends
    on the HW, not the IOS. In your case
    I assume you are using the NM-4/8E/T1-IMA,
    which does support 1.0.
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/mut1e1p1.htm#xtocid1
    Regardless, the IOS you are using can
    be providing you with problems; the
    support for this NM came in 12.0(5)T, so
    you may consider upgrading (maybe try the
    latest 12.1 mainline) to see if that helps.

Maybe you are looking for