Slow performance of Day 1 Sync batches in CC&B and MDM

Im running a data conversion team on a project that is integrating CC&B 2.3.1 (currently running SP3 and Framework13) and MDM 2.0 (currently running SP4)
We are using the Day 1 Sync batches to replicate data mastered in CC&B for Service Points, Contacts and Service Agreements/Usage Subscriptions into MDM.
While running the Initial Sync batches for Service Point, Contact and SA/US to MDM, the time taken taken is very long. We have tried to run the batches in both single and multiple threads ranging upto 8 threads but the performance was not improved with more threads.
While running the Initial SYnc Service Point batch from CC&B, with 8 threads and 48,060 records it took 11 hours and 41 minutes which is equivalent to just over 1 record processed per second. The overall batch run time in MDM was close to 7 hours.
While running the Initial Sync bactches for SA/US in MDM, it took a total of 31 hours to process close to 60,000 records.
This is a big concern from a Migration perspective as the volumes of data would be much more than 48,000 records. And considering 48,000 records took around 12 hours, we're concerned regarding the overall timings for all the Sync batches.
Below are the timings taken to execute the various batches for Initial Sync in MDM:
Service Point Sync (48,060 records)
F1-SYSRQ (Sync Request Sampling Monitor Batch): 2 hrs 30 minutes
F1-SAKRQ (Sync Request- Allocate keys monitor): 43 minutes
D1-SIKSP (Initial Sync Request- Resolve keys SP): 1 hr 47 minutes
D1-SILSP (Initial Sync Request- Load Data SP): 2 hours 12 minutes
Usage Subscription Sync for 60,000 records:
F1-SYSRQ (Sync Request Sampling Monitor Batch): 4 hrs 34 minutes
D1-SIIER (Initial Sync Request Error): 7 hrs 18 minutes
F1-SAKRQ (Sync Request- Allocate keys monitor): 46 minutes
D2-SIKUS (Initial Sync Request- Resolve keys US): 18 hrs
D2-SILUS (Initial Sync Request- Load Data US): 1 hr 28 minutes
Please note that we're running on Service Pack 4 for MDM.
Technical Specification of the environment that these batches are running on:
CC&B:
Online/Batch Server (Number of Servers * RAM * CPU) 2 * 4GB * 2CPU
OS AIX 6.1 TL7
JDK JDK v5.0 SR10 64-bit
Weblogic Version 10.0 MP2
Batch threads <= 8
JVM Count 2
MDM:
Online/Batch Server (Number of Servers * RAM * CPU) 2 *4GB * 2CPU
OS AIX 6.1 TL7
JDK JDK v6.0 SR8 64-bit
Weblogic Version 10.3.3
Batch threads <= 8
JVM Count 2
Has anyone seen issues with performance of these batches previously? When running the number of records processed by CC&B and received by MDM are in alignment so there is no issue in teh Fusion Middleware. It just seems that the processing speed of CC&B and MDM is poor.

Hi Amaresh - thanks for your response.
We are running batch online in our conversaion test environment. For the final Prodcution environmnet we'll be using third party software - CTRL-M.
We seem to be getting some additional speed now by running the batch with multiple threads but I'm still not convinced that this is going to be enough.

Similar Messages

Very slow performance in CS6 X64 compared to CS5 X64 and temp file very big

Hello to everyone,
I have the same problem as described on this link and the same "solution" to move to layer "easily without delay" !
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4290563
the solution to remove these huge delays is:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4290563
"1. Go the Layers Palette fly-out menu and select Panel Options... "
"2. Set Thumbnails to "None"
My computer setup:
Windows 7 x64 SP1
CPU Core i7 (@3.7 GHz)
NVIDIA GTX295 (latest drivers)
Total 12Gb RAM (8Gb for system + 4Gb for RAMDISK R:\)
C:\ = SSD
D:\ = Velociraptor 150Gb
E:\ = Velociraptor 300Gb
R:\ 4Gb (temp files for windows, user, winzip and more)
My tests with file 66.4 MB with much layer, text, group. Photoshop is already running and I use the menu "File / Open" :
IN CS5 (12.0.4) X64:
about 6.13 seconds
size of the temporary file on C:\ = 2951296 KB
Setup in photoshop:
10943 Mo memory seen
Percent of possible use memory 82% (8974 Mo)
IN CS6 X64:
about 137 seconds
size of the temporary file on C:\ = 20216832 KB
Setup in photoshop:
10991 Mo memory seen
Percent of possible use memory 82% (9012 Gb)
Sorry for my bad English, I do my best to explain the problem identified.
Steve

Hi Adam,
I did the test and that's exactly the right solution. Actually if I put "128" (which is default in CS5) instead of 1024 (which is default in CS6), charging is as fast as with CS5 and in addition the temporary file is also much less fat (the same size with CS5 !)
I note that the speed problem that I mentioned is not really a problem, but only because of a difference in configuration "default" of the two versions.
Still the problem of activation or none of "Thumbnails" which creates delays (even unable to work properly) to move layers or group. Problem mentioned (and shown in video) on the link I put in my first message !
Thank you,
Steve

Lion: very slow performance of my macbook pro

very slow performance.
went to terminal, did the top command, and got following results (mind you, ONLY have Safari and of course Terminal open):
Processes: 96 total, 4 running, 9 stuck, 83 sleeping, 419 threads      19:07:17
Load Avg: 1.99, 1.81, 1.59 CPU usage: 2.36% user, 5.21% sys, 92.41% idle
SharedLibs: 1660K resident, 0B data, 0B linkedit.
MemRegions: 15947 total, 2662M resident, 47M private, 209M shared.
PhysMem: 695M wired, 2175M active, 1083M inactive, 3953M used, 13M free.
VM: 250G vsize, 1093M framework vsize, 699065(68) pageins, 1724738(881) pageouts
Networks: packets: 70104/55M in, 66648/10M out.
Disks: 966630/9347M read, 327765/18G written.
PID   COMMAND      %CPU TIME     #TH #WQ #POR #MREG RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE
4058 top          5.2   00:03.32 1/1 0    28   29    912K   216K   1620K
4055 bash         0.0   00:00.02 1    0    20   23    356K   216K   1112K
4052 CVMCompiler 0.0   00:00.30 1    0    30   69    7780K 220K   16M
4051 login        0.0   00:00.08 2    1    33   63    928K   216K   2184K
4049 Terminal     0.3   00:01.34 7    3    128+ 164+ 7580K+ 13M    15M+
4042 ocspd        0.0   00:00.02 1    0    26   33    420K+ 276K   1376K+
4041 WebProcess   0.0   00:04.35 7    3    119 201   16M-   10M    26M-
4039 Safari       1.1   00:09.44 12   3    193 413   47M-   20M    81M-
3958 spindump_age 0.0   00:00.02 2    2    38   55    356K   220K   1100K
3956 spindump     1.3   00:42.93 16/1 13   228 145   46M+   15M    53M+
3953 aosnotifyd   0.0   00:00.18 3    1    53   279   2064K 3532K 6156K
3939 AddressBookM 6.8   06:59.11 4    1    68   4067+ 2131M- 3308K 1554M-
3895 lsboxd       0.0   00:00.06 2    2    49   69    1156K 6820K 3292K
3031 cookied      0.0   00:01.36 2    1    42   82    2028K 268K   3
every minute or so the computer blocks, every 3 or 4 hours I have to restart etc.
any suggestions?

ok, stopped syncing in System preferences and even (horror) deleted the file which reappeared in seconds.
now waiting to see if stopping the syncing helps - though computer is now working a bit better, the info on Activity Monitor would indicate it is not a real improvement
473           AddressBookMobileMeSharingAgent          me          1,4          4          1.020,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
312           helpd          me          0,4          65          358,9 MB          Intel (64 bit)
0           kernel_task          root          1,1          76          336,6 MB          Intel (64 bit)
459           Mail          me          0,4          9          276,2 MB          Intel (64 bit)
194           java          root          0,1          30          162,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)
405           Safari          me          0,5          12          120,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
407           Safari Web Content          me          0,2          7          100,3 MB          Intel (64 bit)
195           WindowServer          _windowserver          0,5          7          64,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)

Slow Performance Forms 10g !!!!

Hi,
I have migrated several forms from 6i to 10g and i use a 11g Database.
Most of the users accessing from different countries complain of slow performance but the basic idea of migration is to get a better performance. My users mostly work on laptops.
I am unable to find where the problem is. Is this might be due to network traffic since they are accessing via internet or any server related issues. Please help me to find and fix the problem and is there any tips for gaining better performance in using forms 10g.
Regards,
Suresh

So, were they running on 6i via laptop and accessing via the internet before you migrated ? (ie: was it 6i client server or 6i web forms)
Did you migrate the database too ?
Slow performance as in : it used to be seconds and now it's taking minutes ?
Steve

Slow Performance CS 55, Indesign, Acrobat

Hello,
ever since upgrading from CS 50 to CS55 the whole suite is incredibly slow, especially Acrobat and Indesign. Phonesupport is unable to figure it out and points out that increased quality in display reduces overall performance "a little". CS 5.0 had no such problems and the computer is not a small one as well: Mac Pro 12 Core, 32 GB Ram, 512 GB SSD Primary, ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024 MB with 3x Cinema 30".
I know tripple head configs are tricky but that can not be the problem in this case, or?
*ANY* help appreciated!
Marc

John,
i think both applications share a big part: the displaying engine. i have set up a basic test: opening 5 PDFs (select all in finden, cmd+Enter > Acrobat opens 5 PDFs sequentially) and pressing CMD+Q some seconds after (This will shut down acrobat, closing all opened PDFs right after opening has completed). On my machine this takes 33 seconds with this pdf: http://www.baumarkt-ahrensburg.de/fileadmin/pdf/tipps/Bade-_und_Duschwanne_einbauen.pdf; which is about 29 seconds too long for my taste.
I have not installed any third party software in Acrobat, but was unable to test it with CS50, because a downgrade is not possible without fully de-/installing the whole suite.
I have tested repairing permissions, adding a new admin user, macCleaner, Safe-Reboot (yields even slower performance) with no success.
Opening this PDF and 4 copies (5 in total) with Acrobat Reader X within Parallels on the same machine results in total open/close time of 8sec. Which would be acceptable as well; but only on my mac not within emulation
Additionally i do not have any antivirussoftware nor other background software running...
Any further ideas?
Marc

Seemingly slow performance

I have an 8 month old iBook G4. I regularly play sim city 4 and command and conquer generals, and I have to set the all options to run the graphics and all the options at minimum so that I can get reasonable play speed and so that it doesn't momentarily pause. I also find that I occasionally get the spinning beach ball of death momentarily if I have 5 or 6 applications open. Is this normal for this type of machine ( i have fully updated tiger) or am I suffering from some issue that is slowing my machine.
I am a little bit miffed about this especially as apple is now selling the new macbook, which is about 10 times as good, for the same price!!!
Thanks

How much RAM do you have installed, David?
What is your hard drive's capacity, and how much space remains available on it?
Slow performance can be caused by lack of RAM and/or hard drive space: http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/lackofram.html
How long has it been since you did any hard drive maintenance? If it's been awhile, try booting into Safe Mode. This will take quite awhile longer than a normal startup because it does a file check and repair of the hard disk.
You will see your normal desktop. Once completely started up in Safe Mode, restart normally, and go to Applications > Utilities > Disk Utility. Click on the top hard drive icon in the left sidebar and note the S.M.A.R.T. status at the bottom right of the pane. What does it say?
Select the named boot volume in the left sidebar, and repair permissions on it.
See if a little hard drive maintenance helps things out.

Hi, I upgraded from iOS 5.1.1, to iOS 6, and it's ridiculously slow, I can't sync to my computer, (manually manage music), and all of my photos were gone. How can I get my photos back? It says restoring photos, but it's said that for two days now!

Hi, I upgraded from iOS 5.1.1, to iOS 6, and it's ridiculously slow, I can't sync to my computer, (manually manage music), and all of my photos were gone. How can I get my photos back? It says restoring photos, but it's said that for two days now!

It just does't sync. I connect it to itunes, but nothing happens. Where it says how much space I have, it's just on ebig bar that says other. I can play my music on itunes, but not when i unplug it.
All of my photos were gone, i took and saved them with my ipod.
The photo app is saying restoring.
What should i do?

Lightroom 5.4 to Lightroom Mobile sync is soooo slow - why no local sync?

I am testing the new Lightroom 5.4 with Lightoom Mobile. What really annoys me is the fact that all photos are going up to the Creative Cloud. I have private pictures which should be private. Always. No upload. No Cloud sync. It is important!
Speed is the next major problem. LR 5 is way too slow for a fluid workflow. But this is mentioned from other users.
What absolutely makes me sad ist the sync speed of LR5.4 to LR Mobile. 100 Photos took up to 4 hours. On a typical wedding I have 2000+ images. Depending on the speed of the first 100 photos I have to wait 80+ hours? Are you kiddding me? This makes LR Mobile unusable. My clients are expecting results fast. Speed is one factor to the next contract.
Overall, I don't want to sync anything into the Cloud. I want a to use my fast local sync via WiFi or USB. Only those two options. I want to sync photos even without any internet connection successfully and quickly.
I'm fine with authentication with Adobe servers for licensing verification. But that's it. The rest should be configurable by the users whether they Cloud sync or not.

Tom, thank you for taking your time to come here and enlighten us with the decision making process behind what was done. Like it was said before here, the Lightroom Mobile so far has been very, very frustrating. I came home very excited to test it and make my dream come true. To be able to take my catalog (or a shoot) with me on the subway, etc and be able to choose the photos on my iPad. See, I am a photographer and I shoot mainly fashion and beauty, so my workflow starts as soon as I finish shooting by importing all images into Lightroom and then going through the painstaking process of choosing which picture to use. I would shoot anywhere between 5-12 looks in a day, around 100 photos per look and at the end of the process I need to choose only one photo from each look. This normally involves going back multiple times to be able to get to only one from each look. The LR Mobile would have been the perfect solution for me, making me able to look at photos while out of the office, on the subway, at home, etc. It would have made my editing process much faster (or less slow). Instead, I've been sitting and waiting for 6 hours so far and only 18 photos showed up on my iPad (from the 500+ that were chosen to be synced from my desktop LR. Now I know it's not my internet that is making it that slow because I have 80+Mbps of download and 40+Mbps upload. And that haven't helped me much as my LR is stuck on "Syncing 527 photos" for the last 5 hours. Most professional photographers that I know deal with a huge amount of photos from a photoshoot. Wedding, fashion, advertising, we all shoot 1000+ images in any given work day. To come home and have to wait 100 hours before we are able to edit on the iPad is just not useful. This will be useful for the amateur photographer that will take photos of their children/dog/flowers and want to be able to show their guests the photos without having to get them in front of the computer.
Now I understand what you said about having to have a centralized place so that all the clients up to date on the changes, and I think that is great but I also think that it's paramount that there's a different way of syncing, a faster, more efficient way. Even if it is, like mentioned, not a "everything in sync" solution. Something like sync the desktop to the iPad and only those two work together. If both are changed before the next sync, a "the 'blabla' catalog has been changed since you last synced, do you want to overwrite it?" takes care of the problem, much in the same way that Photoshop asks us when we are saving something that has been somewhat modified by some external agent between saves. But the beauty of shooting all day, loading everything in Lightroom at night at the hotel and in the morning catch your flight and edit your shoot on the iPad while traveling, or being able to show the clients on the iPad right after you shot the wedding, or (what I was dreaming was going to be possible just to have my dreams crushed when started to use it) shooting tethered on the job and giving the art director the iPad so that he/she can see the shots without having to stay in front of the computer during the whole shoot. Now THAT would be a game changer! That was what I was expecting from LR Mobile but unfortunately got disappointed. I'd pay for the app alone if it did that!

Ever since installing iCloud and Lion my computer is slow or freezes. The color wheel comes on and My work stops. I have only a small window of time where my computers will function normally during the day. I know many others that have the same problem.

Ever since installing iCloud and Lion my computer is slow or freezes. The color wheel comes on and My work stops. I have only a small window of time where my computers will function normally during the day. I know many others that have the same problem. I'll get 20-30 minutes of work done and then a sync or something comes on, the color wheel of death shows up, and my productivity is shot. I have to shut the computer down the hard way! when it comes back up, it is still either frozen or slow. I've checked in at the genius bar and all they say is that there have been some problems that Apple is trying to fix. It effects Mail, Contacts, Safari, Calendar....yeah, pretty much everything. My iPhone and iPad are not effected as much so I end up doing what I can with them. I've seen the blogs out there and understand that many have the same problem. I have been waiting to read about a fix but I have found nothing! Any ideas?

Not enough free space on the startup disk can slow the system down.
Right or control click the MacintoshHD icon. Click Get Info. In the Get Info window you will see Capacity and Available. Make sure there's a minimum of 15% free disk space.
For startup issues... open System Preferences > Users & Groups - Login Items. Delete any apps listed there then restart your mac.
And disable the Lion "resume" feature.
Open System Preferences > General
Deselect: Restore windows when quitting and re-opening apps
And Spotlight may be indexing... you can turn that off > Turning Off Spotlight | Mac Tricks And Tips

Slow Performance Weeks after Encryption

I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also try? Thanks!

Yes, but nothing from Novell yet - I will keep pushing them forward and let you know if I get some results.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 8.3.2013 15:29 >>>
Sounds like you have a SR going on this also. Have you heard anything on a
fix? Mine has been stagnant for a while and I just bumped it to see if
anything has been figured out or if more info is needed from my side. Hope
to here something soon. This is a pretty severe problem especially when it
happens multiple times to a machine.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"Jouko Oksanen" <Jouko.Oksanen_re@move_efore.fi> wrote in message
news:513713E9.13C8.00F6.0@move_efore.fi...
Hi,
We have had (maybe) similar issues with our FDE setup that FDE policy
assigned devices tend to loose the policy and start to do disk decryption
and suddenly get once again the policy back and start to encrypt again. This
could be found from "ZCM agent, Full disk encryption, about, Agents status,
Settings, on section "Emergency Recovery Information" you could see events
'Zone Changed' what according to Novell support meant that the policy was
"re-initialized / changed" even our policy counter have not changed = policy
got lost in some phase.
We are now suspecting that there is some issues with the policy service that
plays tricks on us.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 20.2.2013 19:57
>>> >>>
In ZCC on the devices that you are having issues with look at the Emergency
Recovery tab and see if you have multiple listings in here that corresponds
to the slowness. If so your devices are decrypting and then re-encrypting.
Your mention of being asked to reboot leads me to believe that is what is
happening to you.
I have had a few SRs going on this one for a while and it got bumped to
backend but no info in a month or so.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"marklar23" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not
return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that
the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are
experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the
users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they
see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come
and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a
request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not
act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level
like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also
try? Thanks!
marklar23
marklar23's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=5123
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=464262

Video size issues/slow performance after update to CC 2014

Hello everyone,
I'm not an editor by trade, so please bear with me here. I've spent the last few days searching around for an answer and haven't been able to come up with much.
I'm on a late 2011 Macbook Pro, 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3, AMD Radeon HD 6750M 512 MB, Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63b).
I spent a month cutting my first little experimental feature which the assistant editor set up for me (and who is currently away).
My computer isn't rocket fast, but I was able to complete the first few passes on Premiere CC (7.2.2?) with few major issues.
About a week ago, I upgraded to Premiere CC 2014 8.0.
I immediately noticed that my footage went from this:
To this:
(The specifics of the footage:
As you might be able to tell, we shot very old school VHS to help sell the 90's setting. It was a nightmare to find the best way to export it all. I'm still not sure if we did this entirely properly -- and hopefully it's not the cause of these issues. Also, I know VHS is only SD -- we chose to import at the utmost quality, i.e. 1920x1440 and ProRes 422, because more of the image detail was present in low-light.)
I found that I had to select all the clips in each timeline, right click, and select the 'Set to Frame Size' to have the video full frame once again. Then I had to render everything.
As I tried to resume my edit, the performance was much slower. Playback is a nightmare. I get the beach ball of death constantly. It would take several minutes to save the project. And it started to crash about once an hour on top of everything.
But I continued to work for the last eight days, hoping that I'd be able to rectify this somehow.
I cleared the cache with no luck.
I read that I could uncheck 'Composite in Linear Color' to make it faster, but that wasn't an issue in the last build.
My playback and paused resolution is 1/4.
I read that I should update my OS to OS X Mavericks, but that keeps crashing too! Haha.
I understand that my system isn't the best, but I just want my project to perform as well as it did on Premiere CC before the update.
I just spoke to an Adobe tech who basically told me that there wasn't a solution here besides reverting back to Premiere CC from CC 2014 -- or buying a new Macbook.
But there has to be a way that I can get the same performance that I did before the upgrade, right? I have a feeling something happened to how CC 2014 is using the existing footage.
(Also, I noticed that clips where I increased the zoom, i.e. 100% to 110%, were back at their original size. And instead of saying 100%, it was now saying 300%. I'm assuming this is because of the 'Set to Frame Size' setting, but this wasn't the case on Premiere CC.)
Does anyone have any ideas what I can do here?
Here's my sequence settings on CC 2014:
And on CC:
For some reason, portions of this window are grayed out, and not in CC 2014. Not sure if this has anything to do with the issue.
Thanks a ton in advance everyone! I really can't afford to lose 8 days worth of work, so any help would be greatly greatly appreciated!
I'll be more than happy to provide additional info.
I'm really looking to find out, definitively, if my only two options are: a) go back to Premiere CC and lose my recent work, or b) buy a new laptop, which I can't afford.
(As a side question, is there any way I can transfer my recent work from CC 2014 to CC? I understand it's not backwards-compatible, but there has to be at least a partial solution.)
Best,
Jon

Thanks for the quick response!
So just this right (to DV):
I scrubbed through really quick, seems like it just may have worked.

I performed latest software update yesterday 17.2.12 and now my 27 inch imac will not boot up i have had a few problems from day one,not very impressed so far with the imac.

THE OTHER PROBLEMS PRIOR TO THIS ARE
1. KEEPS LOCKING UP WHEN ON CERTAIN WEBSITES (YOU TUBE)
2.VERY SLOW PERFORMING TASKS
I PURCHASED THIS PRODUCT FOR MY SONS THEY LOVE THE IMAC IN REGARDS TO SOFTWARE eg (IMOVIE ) BUT AS FAR AS
THE PERFORMANCE THEY ARE NOT HAPPY........IN THIS DAY AND AGE YOU JUST WANT A RELIABLE MACHINE THAT PERFORMS.
AND FOR JUST UNDER 2K$ AUSTRALIAN YOUR NOT GETTING THAT.

The guys at the Genius Bar actually are Geniuses! They told me that in fact my iMac was one of the first generation and the main board had fried to they way the fan cooled it off. They said the problem was fixed with the second generation iMacs.
They took the computer in, i was 1 month away from the 3 year warranty date, and they are replacing the board and the DVD drive that is not working at no charge!
i'll have it back in 5 days.
Jeff

Hyperion 7.0 Slow Performance

We are having very slow performance with Hyperion Report 7.0 running batches and reports. Has anyone else experienced this and had any success improving the performance?

No reply needed

Fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION very slow performance in bacth job

Hi all experts!
Does any one having a problem with slow performance while using the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION and running in batch mode for a big population of data ?
I have tried to use
    nocommit         = 'X' as parameter in the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION
and calling after each update.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        wait = 'X'.
And the performance is very long.
I also remarque that if we run for a small population like less than 500 employees then it finish within 20 mins. But If I ran for a polulation of 5000 employees then it take more than 6 hours = 3600 mins. ?
Thanks for your answer.
Hugo Nguyen

Call Function module 'HR_PSBUFFER_INITIALIZE' After each call to HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION.
Refer [link|http://brookshireconsulting.com/technical_update.html] for more information.
I have tried it my own and it do improve the performance,.
Hope this improves the performace for you as well.
Regards
Shital

Oracle Collaboration Suite Slow Performance

Hi,
I have encountered with problem with OCS 10.1.2 with following information:
Hardware : DL-380G5
Operating System : OEL 4 update 5 64 bit
Oracle Product : Collaboration Suite 10.1.2
The installation has been done in three server as follow:
Server 1: Application Tier (OCS component such as mail, calendar , discussion , ...)
Server 2: Infrastructure (Oracle Single Sign on)
Server 3 : Infrastructure (Oracle Internet Directory)
Patch Information : Cumulative Patch 10.1.2.4 (Note: 406284.1) + Mandatory Patch after 10.1.2.4 ( Note:
423515.1) + Patch 10.1.0.5 on Infrastructure layer
have been applied on Application tier and Infrastructure.
Problem_ Everything goes well after reboot of all 3 servers and refresh but after 2 hours nobody can
connect to OCS services due to slow performance
Only restarting the servers cause the users can connect to OCS services again.
Any Idea will be appreciated.
Edited by: Oralinux on Oct 29, 2009 5:08 PM

Did you ever find out why this was happening? We seemed to have developed a similar issue and we have had a Severity 1 level SR for 4 days now and no one seems to able to work it out.
cheers
paul

Slow performance of Day 1 Sync batches in CC&B and MDM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for