SMOOTH MOTION IN FILM INDUSTRY ALTHOUGH SHOOTING IN 24P......

Hello guys!
      I always had a general question about film making...
How professional Hollywood films can shoot their footages with such a smoth motion (without any jitters, strobing, blury e.t.c. artifacts) although they are shooting in 24p. 24p is not good especially when we have to deal with panning shots. Interlaced footage is much better in terms of smooth motion. Yet the films are perfect!! So the question is how they can achieve better and smoother motion although they shoot in progressive than in interlaced.
Thanks.

How professional Hollywood films can shoot their footages with such a smoth motion (without any jitters, strobing, blury e.t.c. artifacts) although they are shooting in 24p. 24p is not good especially when we have to deal with panning shots. Interlaced footage is much better in terms of smooth motion. Yet the films are perfect!! So the question is how they can achieve better and smoother motion although they shoot in progressive than in interlaced.
To answer your question directly, there are a couple of things that Hollywood does that you don't normally see when shooting on a smaller crew, smaller budget, etc...
For one, you need to achieve the much discussed shallow depth of field (DOF) over/above what a typical 24p video camera can do. This is a balance of lens focal distance and image sensor size. An old fashioned 35mm film camera has a "sensor" that is many times larger than an HD video sensor. The focal distance of the lenses is also generally a good big larger. Therefore, shallow DOF.
You also need to frame the shot and move the frame just like in Hollywood. Even when you're looking at a large panoramic vista shot, you'll notice that the image pans only very slightly, and many times the subject/foreground remains relatively stationary. This reduces stuttering substantially, to the point it's almost unnoticable (though you WILL notice it if you are actively looking for it). For tighter shots in motion (say, a full-body profile shot of the subject walking across a room), you're going to be panning or trucking at a speed that will cause strobing in the shot more than likely, and this only mitigated by keeping the subject spatially stationary in the frame throughout the move.
Another technique has to do with lighting, combined with the two previous techniques. If the relative luminosity of the foreground/subject is substantially greater than the background or other elements in the frame, the strobing is less noticeable on those secondary elements. Your eye becomes more focused on the foreground brighter objects - similar to the way DOF affects your perception - and so you just don't really notice that dark, strobing background so much.
The 24p strobing effect has very little to do with processing at all. However, converting between frame rates and formats CAN sometimes exacerbate all manner of video artifacts, including strobing in the shot. It's not the usual culprit though.
So hopefully you learned a new word today - TECHNIQUE - and you better understand that it's not as much Hollywood's technology that aids the quality of their product, as it is the TECHNIQUE involved in the production. That should be good news of course....technique can be learned, whereas much everything else about Hollywood's production aesthetic comes with an enormous price tag that most independent producers cannot afford.

Similar Messages

  • Conforming 25fps offline sequence to 50fps online media and maintaining smooth motion effect in FCP7

    I am editing something shot at 50fps with the intention of playing it back at 25fps for a smooth motion effect.
    the footage is shot on a RED and I have created proxies from REDcineX that have been transcoded to 25. Everything is working fine but it has just occurred to me that when the offline edit is complete I may run in to issues relinking to the original media as it will still be 50fps.
    Will the fact that my FCP7 sequence is a 25fps timebase solve this problem or will there be timecode mismatches between the cuts on my 25fps proxies and my 50fps RED quicktime reference files? If there are issues with that, is there a way to solve them?

    this doesn't seem like a very common workflow (at least in my experience) so you might not get any responses.  Why not do a test with a short sequence with just a couple of shots to see if you're gonna have any problems down the road.  It's always a good idea to test your complete workflow before you start editing.  In this case, better late than never.

  • I imported some 24P HD videos from my DSLR to Aperture but these videos do not show up in iMovie '09 for editing purposes. Although my previous 24P HD Videos from iPhoto '09 show up. Why can't I access these videos stored in Aperture library?

    I imported some 24P HD videos from my DSLR to Aperture but these videos do not show up in iMovie '09 for editing purposes. Although my previous 24P HD Videos from iPhoto '09 show up. Why can't I access these videos stored in Aperture library? I assumed that like  the videos in iPhoto, I would be able to access the videos in Aperture through iMovie. Come on Apple! I am starting to get frustrated with your products here. And this is saying a lot when I have been using and loving apple products for the last 4 years.

    Hi. My camera is a Canon 600D. And yes my videos are stored in the Aperture library and they are not referenced. Even then I tried to select all the videos in Aperture and clicked 'consolidate masters' and there was a messge that said all 'none of the files are referenced',... so they didn't need consolidating.
    I also tried preferences> export> external video editor > choose > iMovie. And then right click on the video to edit with imovie. Even then the video didn't show up in iMovie. It seems like the only option for me is to import the videos directly to iMovie which means there will be two versions of the same file stored in my computer eating up space.
    APPLE. What are you doing?

  • How to preserve 60i smooth motion?

    Hi all!
    I've been using FCE to edit, and then making iDVD to make disks.  When I was shooting with a DV camera, this worked fine, and I got smooth 60i motion when I played the DVDs on a TV.
    But now I have an AVCHD camera, and when I export, iDVD turns the 1080/60i into 480/30p.  I understand that some people like the 30p look as being more cinematic, but my event coverage has lots of camera pans, and the 30p motion makes these look much worse then 60i. I know that the high motion is still there when I export 1080i from FCE, because I can play the file and see the "mouse teeth", but I can't find any way to turn 1080i into 480i without loosing the smooth high motion that is present in the original.  Any ideas?
    BTW, I noticed with disapointment that even with the newest iMacs, 60i footage is still presented to the viewer as 30p, unless I used Final Cut Pro to turn it into 60p.  My Elgato TV tuner can make 60p happen on my current screen from 60i broadcasts, so why does this still not work?  Is there a setting somewhere?

    The workflow in your first paragraph sounds fine. I'm guessing that "quick AIC  way" means exporting a reference movie. But regardless, it sounds like that part of the process is working as it should. (Pursuing the DV idea further doesn't strike me as likely to be fruitful. The advantage of exporting as Quick Time Movie, current settings, is that it avoids the additional compression step that QT Conversion always performs.)
    Although I don't use this workflow, many people report good results by dropping their HD sequence into an SD sequence and export that as a QT movie to bring into Compressor, where they create MPEG files before authoring DVDs. You might try that approach (of course skipping the Compressor step) and bring the SD movie into iDVD to see whether you get better results.
    If that leads to another dead end, you might consider investing in software that will give you more control than you have now with FCE and iDVD. 
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • How to make smooth motion questions

    Maybe this isn't the best way to achieve optimal results, but here's what I'm trying to do:
    Make a slideshow with many jpegs. Many pics are odd size, so I made a grid inside a 6000 x 720 comp. I've then taken that 6000 comp and placed it into a 1280 comp and animated the x position.
    Q1: I've tried a combination of exports, but nothing looks smooth on a final render to h.264 (the deliverable format). I've noticed that 60fps/ProRes provides nice results, but when I export to 29.97 h.264 it's all jerky.
    Q2: Render hit. It's takes a very long time to render. In general, is there a better way to do this from a render hit perspective?
    Any help greatly appreciated.

    Your description sounds like judder. It's an issue cinematographers have been dealing with in their pans since the beginning of cinema. For a recent example of a Hollywood blockbuster film that messed this up, see the opening shot of Cowboys & Aliens.
    For tips to avoid it in motion graphics, read this.

  • Help With Ease In/Ease Out / Smooth Motion

    I'm in the process of completing a historical documentary and have run into a problem. The project calls for a LOT of photos. And, as usual, most of the pix have different types of moves attached to them. I'm trying to get the moves to start and stop on the photos with an "ease in" and/or "ease out" effect. Normally, I'd do this in AE, but due to time constraints (not to mention the volume of pix), I'd rather get the gist of it down in FCP.
    I've tried both the "Ease In/Ease Out" and "Smooth" keyframe commands. Smooth seems to work best. If there's a center position change during the move however, the photo appears to slightly "float" up and down during the duration of the move - especially when starting and stopping. Problem is, I don't want it to float... I just want it to move smoothly from point A to point B.
    Is there a way to gradually start and then gradually stop movement on an object (such as a photo), without having this floating effect?
    Thanks.
    Tim Walton
    Dual 2.0ghz G-5   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   FCP 5.1.1 (Studio)

    Normally, I'd do this in AE, but due to time constraints (not to mention the volume of pix), I'd rather get the gist of it down in FCP.< </div>
    You will like neither the animation process nor the results in FCP.
    There is simple coverage of eases in the FCP manual, you will want to find that section and put a stickie on it. Beware that FCP's native DV rendering for motion blows. You will need to add some blur but not motion blur. FCPS's motion blur is nothing like AE's motion blur. It's awful.
    The problems you will have are going to drive you nuts. The keyframes and Beziers in FCP are skittish and spazzy, nothing like the smooth and elegant controls that have always been available in AE. It's like Apple decided to reinvent the entire Bezier handling system and they forgot to finish the job.
    I suggest you stick to AE for this work but that's just me. Figure out how to make FCP's motion madness work later when you have more time to mess with it.
    bogiesan

  • I am filming a musical tomorrow so need a reply ASAP! Should i shoot in 24p or 60i?

    Obviously i know the difference between progressive and interlaced, the thing is i am using my cam which is the Sony HXR-NX5U and my secondary camera, the Sony CX580V only has the option to record in 24p, 60i, or 60p. My HXR cam can do 60i, 30p, and 24p. I know for the most part you want progressive, but given that it is a musical, i'm not sure if the higher frame rate would be more appropriate or not? Any advice would be appreciated!  I know it isn't technically adobe premiere pro related (even though thats the software i use, but you guys know stuff!! Help!)

    I know for the most part you want progressive
    That's not necessarily true.  For Blu-ray or DVD delivery, 30i would be the better option over 30p or 60p, as 30i can go onto disk "as-is", without any frame rate conversions.
    I think the choice on this is purely aesthetic.  Do you want the look of film (24p) or the look of video (30i)?
    Personally, I shoot everything at 24 fps these days.

  • Easy way to do smooth motion pan and zoom on a video clip?

    Howdy..
    As a recent convert from Vegas and Premiere Pro, I'm very happy with FCP6, with 1 issue: Easy moves on video clips.
    It's very easy to setup a move with the motion filter, but the problem is that zooming with moving on the clip with 'ease-in' is problematic.
    The scaling and motion seem to accelerate at different rates, making it very tough to achieve a smooth pan and zoom at the same time (either one by itself is easy).
    I've tried using anchor points, but that's difficult when doing several moves on a clip.
    Basically, is there ANY way (either native or via a plug-in) to set up simple pan+zooms on a video clip, with smoothness turned on without having the 'slingshot' effect that you get? I know I can mess around with the acceleration points, but this is tough to do with 100 of clips that need adjusting.
    I'd appreciate any help you can offer..
    Thanks...
    Best,
    Ben

    Howdy...
    Usually I set easy-in/out on the canvas window (for center) and then 'smooth' on the keyframes (for scale) in the motion window.
    Can you actually set smoothing for center in the viewer? I think you can only set easy-in/out for center in the canvas. (could be wrong on this one).
    I wish it worked like in Motion. Much easier and more intuitive, but one shouldn't have to jump to a different app just to do a simple pan and zoom...
    Any other ideas?
    -Ben

  • Smooth motion  Tween

    Hi,
    I'm creating this flash dynamic gallery,
    can you check this and tell me how can i smooth this
    tweenings,
    sometimes its not smooth,
    http://www.freative.com/test/gallery/

    slow your easing.

  • Why are my tools like brush, eraser, pencil (basically any that you would use to make a smooth motion that would affect the layers) is not working and acts as if I clicked once and let go.  I have checked spacing and reset tools and brushes. Please help!

    I haven't had issues with this in the past and I've checked the different modes the layers are in as well as the brushes are in.  I've also checked spacing to make sure it isn't wrong.  An example of what it is doing, would be to use the brush tool and try to draw a circle.  Normally, this wouldn't be an issue but the tool only makes a dot as if I quickly pressed and released tool, but I'm holding down to draw the image.  All tools that do similar functions such as blur, eraser, pencil, paint are doing the same thing.... Please help!!

    Photoshop Elements doesn't respond when you use editing tools in Mac OS X 10.10

  • Panasonic DVX100 (original) should I shoot in 24p or 30p?

    Hey,
    Working on my first feature and will be editing in Final Cut Express HD 3.5. Want our dailies to look progressive scan and filmic should I shoot and edit in 30p?
    Chris

    I know for the most part you want progressive
    That's not necessarily true.  For Blu-ray or DVD delivery, 30i would be the better option over 30p or 60p, as 30i can go onto disk "as-is", without any frame rate conversions.
    I think the choice on this is purely aesthetic.  Do you want the look of film (24p) or the look of video (30i)?
    Personally, I shoot everything at 24 fps these days.

  • Panasonic Lumix LX3, shooting RAW with Film Modes

    I've been shooting RAW+JPEG and testing Film Modes (for example B&W) and noticed that RAW images will import "tabula rasa" without any of the Film Mode settings applied. JPEGs are naturally as supposed.
    I'm wondering if this is how it's supposed to work, as the RAW's first show a thumbail with Film Mode's settings, for example b&w first shows as b&w, but eventually Aperture processes a new thumbnail with standard raw settings. (I don't have previews on).
    I know raw is raw and you can't shoot it b&w, but I can't help thinking if there are some in-camera RAW settings that Aperture just doesn't know how to read and pre-apply when it's imported.
    The in-camera b&w settings would be nice starting point for further raw-editing in Aperture, but now one has to start from scratch.
    Anyone know if this is how it works, maybe with other cameras too?

    That's propably it. Only, I've read some reviews of LX3 that claim you can also shoot Film Modes in RAW. For example Mark Goldstein at photographyblog.com says:
    "This [=film mode] applies to both JPEG and RAW files, so you can effectively shoot a black and white RAW file, for example, out of the camera if you wish (although I'm not sure why you'd want to...). "
    This makes no sense to me as I believe you can only get one kind of RAW from a sensor, but it makes me wonder if there still should be a way to have some kind of B&W RAW straight from the camera and Aperture just doesn't know how to interpret it.
    I also agree with Goldstein that I wouldn't want it to shoot b&w destructively, but rather as a non-destructive "layer".
    Also the LX3 manual doesn't say a word that you couldn't use Film Modes when shooting RAW, and it's quite good at telling what is not applicable for certain modes.

  • Effect or script to smoothly center a layer after motion stabilization

    Suppose I've used the motion tracker to perfectly stabilize a feature of interest. As a result, the feature is dead still within the frame. What I'm trying to achieve is to stabilize the jerky motion but preserve the overall motion of the feature around the frame.
    For example, suppose that at the start of the footage, the feature is in the left half of the frame, then moves to the right, and then to the top. After stabilization, the feature is stationary while the layer is shifted to the right, then to the left, then to the bottom to compensate. What I'd like to see instead is that it stays generally in the left half, then generally in the right, then at the top, like it did initially, only with sudden jerks smoothed out.
    To do what I want, I'm now thinking of having the (stabilized) layer get gently "pulled" towards the center of the frame, so that sudden shifts due to the stabilization are still there, but overall the layer returns to the center eventually.
    Another way of looking at this is that I'd like to apply a high-pass filter to the tracked path, removing low-frequency motion from the path.
    Does anyone know of a ready-made effect or script to achieve this?

    You're overthinking this. Retaining smooth motion while remove jerky motion is built into the Warp Stabilizer effect. You don't need to run a script afterward or anything. I show how to remove jerks while retainng a camera pan in this video:
    http://www.video2brain.com/en/lessons/overview-of-warp-stabilizer-effect
    I strongly recommend that you work your way through these materials before trying to use the Warp Stabilizer effect:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/toddkopriva/2011/04/warp-stabilizer-in-after-effects-cs5-5.html

  • Smooth Slow Motion from 50 fps Clip in 50 fps Timeline

    If I want 50% smooth slow motion from a 50 FPS video clip, I would normally ask PP to interpret that clip as 25 FPS - that works great.
    If however I import the 50 FPS video clip and interprett it as 50 FPS, I would have to set the speed of the video clip in the timeline to 50% to get the same level of slow motion.
    The question is - when I follow the latter method, does PP create new frames for the slow motion or is it clever enough to use all the frames from the original 50 FPS video clip? to put it another away, does PP always generate NEW frames for slow motion or does it try to use the frames we are attempting to ignore?
    I've done some basic tests and so far I can't see any real difference between the two methods. This leads me to beleive PP is effectively using all of the original 50 frames when the 50 fps video clip is imported into a 50 fps timeline and then slowed down in the timeline by 50%. - if this is the case, well done PP!!! If this is not the case, then it would be a welcomed enhancement in future releases.
    I guess what you are all wondering is why would I want to import a 50 fps video clip into a 50 fps timeline and then slow it down in the timeline - well, as a wedding Videographer, it is simply because some parts of the video need to be in slow motion and other parts like messages and speeches need to be interpreted at normal speed. If playback in the timeline is at normal speed, i find it simpler to slow down the "Walking Down the Isle" clips rather than having to speed up the speeaches and messages.
    In short, when importing 50 fps video for smooth slow motion, are both the following methods equally effective in terms of smooth motion?
    Method 1: Import the 50 fps video clip into 25 fps timeline
    Method 2: import the 50 fps video clip into 50 fps timeline and set the speed of the video clip in the timeline to 50% - I'm assuming PP does not generate new frames and gets them from the original 50 fps file instead..
    To put it another way, does PP ALWAYS attempt to generate new fromes when slowing down video in the timeline? When extra frames are available in the original video file, does PP try to get the extra frames from that file instead of generating new ones?

    I recorded 2 video clips of the same scene. The camera was panning from right to left.
    First video clip - recorded at 25 fps
    second video clip - recorded at 50 fps
    Both video clips recorded at the same panning speed of the same scene.
    1. If I import the 25 fps video into 25 fps timeline and slow it down by 50%, the exported video looks jerky.
    2. If I import the 50 fps video clip into 25 fps timeline, the exported video looks smooth motion.
    3. If I import the 50 fps video clip into 50 fps timeline, slow it down in the timeline by 50%, and export the video as 25 fps then the result is still smooth motion.
    I've only done the experiment once and may have to repeat to be absolutely sure.

  • Smooth Slow Motion

    I am looking for a way to create 50 percent slow motion based on odd and even fields. Instead of replicating the odd or even field to make a 15 frames per second, jittery, slow motion, I want to separate the odd and even field, and then interpolate the missing half frame, thus producing a 30 frame per second smooth motion clip that is based on the 60 half frames per second frame rate of video. I know this can be done because Premiere does it automatically. Note: I am not trying to make smooth motion where there is a half translucent image of the preceding frame always on top of the current frame.

    Okay, I think Graeme Nattress wrote a plugin to do that, but here's a way to do it in FCP...
    Cut your clip on V1 and V2, slow each down 50% with no frame blending. On each clip put the de-interlace filter, on V1 take it from field 1, on V2 take it from field 2. Now apply the blink filter and set it for 1 frame on and 1 frame off. This way it will take first one frame from V1, then one from V2, etc...
    Mind you this is a lot of monkey motion, but it should give you the effect you are looking for.
    Try it, post back...
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for

  • DMVPN + MPLS best-path selection

    Dear Community We're in the process of deploying DMVPN as a backup solution to MPLS. All that is working great! The DMVPN wan is dual-cloud, with 2 hub routers in each cloud. Phase 3 (nhrp shortcut) is enabled on all the spokes. For routing, all the 

  • No thumbnails appear in iweb media for photos

    Back in Jan, this question was asked but I could not find the answer to this topic and it had a green star. Sorry to be redundant but this just happened. Could someone please help me out ? Thank you in advance. When I select media on iWeb, iWeb pulls

  • Session object question put vs. putValue vs. setAttribute?

    I have the following code: <%@ page import="java.util.*" %> <jsp:useBean id="EducationBean" class="java.util.Hashtable" scope="session" /> <% String swCurrFileName = "swcontrol.jsp"; Enumeration params = request.getParameterNames(); while (params.has

  • Convert from 2012 to 2011

    hello dear friends ! would it be possible for someone to convert these vi  into 2011 LabView version ? Very big thanks for him ! Attachments: WS2012.zip ‏331 KB

  • Apple calendar reminder is really poor

    Apple calendar reminder is really poor, it makes a beep ones and then its gone... pleeeease apple, include the option that the user will be reminded until canceling the reminder. I have never forgot so much things as when I bought the Iphone.. And on