SNP Purchase Reqs transfer problem

Hi,
during the SNP Purchase requisitions immediate transfer, the pur reqs are not transferred from a specific location(although this location and products in it are active), pur reqs are transferred without any problem in other locations/products.
how to rectify this.
Vignesh

Hi Vignesh,
Check if the publication settings are maintained for external procurement for this location in APO. you can use the Tcode /sapapo/cp2.
Maintain the location no, publication type should be 21 for external procurement and ECC system accordingly.In case not maintained, kindly maintain the same. This is required for data transfer to ECC system
Let me know if it helps.
Regards
Gaurav

Similar Messages

  • Contracts assigned to APO SNP purchase reqs

    I am using APO SNP release 7.
    I have a product for which a purchasing contract has been CIF'ed to APO and which is referenced on the transport lane from the vendor to the plant.
    If I run a heuristic plan in SNP to generate purchase reqs for the product, will the contract be actually assigned to the purchase req in APO, or will the assignment of the contract actually take place when the purchase req is in ECC (having been passed from APO)?
    Thanks for any advice on this...

    HI,
    When you CIF contract to APO , the external procurement relationships get created for the same in APO which in turn result in creation of TLanes(From Vendor to Plant)
    On running Heuristic, the TLanes are picked up from APO itself. It is not that purchase req gets created in APO and when CIFF'ing back to R/3 , it picks the tlane rel data from the contract
    For confirmation you may want to test this by ensuring that the Pur  req does not get trasferred to ECC(U have an option saying, DO NOT TRANSFER RESULTS, use this). Please test it in TEST System
    Thanks,
    SS

  • Attachment transfer issue from Shopping cart to Purchase req in ECC

    Hello,
    How are you all. Need your expert advise..
    We are trying to achieve functionality where documents which are attached on shopping cart get transfer into Purchase req in ECC (Classic Scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0). For this we have done following config / enhancements:
    - Activated BADI "BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW" in SRM with following code for attachment;
    cs_ctrl_att-BE_DOC_TYPE = 'SRM'.
    cs_ctrl_att-BE_storage_cat = 'DMS_C1_ST'.
    cs_ctrl_att-TRANSFER_ACTIVE = 'X'.
    - Created new document type ECC with t.code DC30 for SRM and assigned the object links for EBAN table.
    After performing above task we are able to see Link of the attachment into Purchase req in ECC with document number (i.e. the one we assigned while defining document type in DC30) but not able to open the document in ECC.
    Could you please let us know if there is any settings which we have missed for actually opening documents in ECC?
    Thank you
    Ritesh

    Issue as reported Please let me know why the docs are not uploaded to SRm succesfully .
    I am facing the below weird issue .
    Easy shopping >Shop> eHiring catalog
    Click Transfer to SRM
    Now click on the button ‘Details’ and open the tab ‘Notes and attachments’
    All attchments are names after the 1st attachment and all have the same file type
    Basically you have lost all you attachments here, except 1 (when you click on the link, all links refer to the same document, so not just cosmetic). This is a problem.
    When you order this shopping cart and search for it and open it again, the attachment tab is even completely empty, so now all attachments are lost.
    Something like this, but less severe, happens in the process a bit further.
    - Approve the shopping cart with the applicable approver
    - Log in as Hiring desk:
    Still no original attachments (like job descriptions).
    Now click button ‘responses and awards’
    Click tab ‘Items’ and fill out price ‘40’ euro
    Click notes and attachment tab
    I added 5 attachments
    As can be seen here, the docx becomes an xlsx again, but it looks like it just takes over the 1st file type that was uploaded, it can also be the other way around (xlsx becomes docx) when the 1st uploaded attachment is a document.
    But in this case, when you click on the link, it will open the right file with the right program, so over here it looks like it is just cosmetic.

  • Can you take the SIM card from an IPad and transfer it to a NEW Ipad (not yet purchased) without any problems? Are there any complicated steps involved? Thanks.

    Can you take the SIM card from an IPad and transfer it to a NEW Ipad (not yet purchased) without any problems? Are there any complicated steps involved? This is for my boss.
    Please let me know. Thanks in advance.

    Simple answer is YES.
    The only caviat is for instance in the UK some iPads are locked to a specific network provider and therefore if the new iPad is locked then it will only work on the specific network it is locked to.

  • Transfer to satisfy demand without raising purchase reqs to buy

    Dear Guru's,
    I have two issues in my project anyone plz give me suggestion
    One thing in particular that I am interested in is somehow identifying excess stock which exists in project segments so that we have it readily identified to transfer to satisfy demand without raising purchase reqs to buy more.
    Another thing I'm interested in is running a report to tell me all the demand available by p/n. We can do this currently as a whole report for all projects and stock items, but not individually.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Deethya.

    closed

  • Problems with Purchase Req.no in relation to Third-party-case

    Hi,
    Im trying  to create a third-party-case invoice with Sales Order No. xxxxxxxx
    I'm getting  an error regarding missing Purchase req. no. (the customer's credit block had to be released).
    This concerns a product that we buy from Helsingborg as XXXX1 and we sell it in XXXX2
    one more question?
    From where the valuation price for PR (w.r.to SO) being generated is taken?
    Thnaks in advance
    Akkshaya

    Akkshya,
    Go to VKM1 Or VKM 4 and release the same..
    Ten try..
    REWARD IF U FINDS THIS AS USEFUL...
    Regds
    MM

  • Third-party Order - purchase req's to SRM

    Hi
    We are using EBP 4.0
    We are creating sales orders with item cat "Third Party Item", the purchase req's are created in R/3 but we have problems when we transfer the purch req's to SRM via BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER.
    There is an errormessage in SMQ1   "<i>Partner not Found</i>". I have also checked SLG1 in SRM but there is no additonal info there.
    I think the problem is related to the Customer (ship to), it looks like the Businnes Partner has to be created for that customer but I don't really understand how it works.
    Any tip ?
    Thx
    Anders
    PS we can transfer normal purchase req's created by MRP to SRM without problem.

    Hi Andres,
    I think this scenario is not supported by SRM. These requisitions will have eban-estkz = 'V' and  there is a check iin the plugin routines which exclude these requisitions from going to SRM. It will be a modification to make this go through SRM and will not be supported.
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vani

  • Goods recipient field not available when creating a service purchase req

    We are trying to create a release strategy for purchase requisitions with acount assignments K, F and P.  The release strategy would use the requisitioner and goods recipient fields to determine the release group.  The issue is when creating a purchase req with item category D for any account assignment, the recipient field cannot be populated.  It is greyed out.  I tried setting the field as mandatory in the IMG at the account assignment level but it doesn't prompt me for a recipient if item category D is entered.  Is there a way to allow this field to be populated?  I don't care if the value is transferred to the purchase order but I need it populated to determine the appropriate release strategy.  We are not using workflow so that is not an option.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Srinivas, I appreciate the response but the requisitioner field is not the problem.  I can set that field to mandatory.  The issue is I cannot populate the recipient field that's located on the account assignment tab of the purchase req.  The recipient field can be populated if the item category field is blank but as soon as I populate the item category with D for service, the recipient field is unavailable.  Is there a way to populate this field when the item category is D?

  • MRP run and creation of one cumulative purchase req

    Hello,
    mrp run is creating a lot of single purchase reqs with one line (quantity and dates are fine)
    but how to set up MRP so that instead of multiple purchase reqs ONE purchase req with many lines is created.
    Thanks, Sebastian

    this is not forseen in the design.
    Where would be the benefit? have a look into table EBAN.
    There would not be one record less with this concept.
    Further, in bigger organizations, several buyers would then work with the same purchase requisition, which could lead to lock and update problems.

  • Purchase req. for STO -in Third Party Sales order .

    Hi gurus,
    Is it possible if i create a sales order a purchase requisition should be genarated. the normal third party PR we can not convert in to STO and   account assignment  catagory "M" is coming in PR but  in case  of STO Pur req. that is not require.
    So is it possible ? if yes can any one plz tell me.
    Rajendra

    hi
    charlie
    this purchase req genarartion will be controlled by Schedule line catagory so
    I am trying to copy Sceduline catatogory CS as ZS in this i want item category as ' 7' ( Stock transfer) and pur req as "UB" but it is giving error as
    "Entry B UB does not exist in T161 (check entry)"
    Rajendra

  • Planned order created after mrp run instead of purchase req

    Hi All,
    I am facing a strange problem about planned order being created after mrp run jobs runs in background instead of purchase req. This is happening randomly. In the material master MRP view 2 procurement type is F and in the varient for the MRP job the in Purchase requisition control parmater 1 is marked that is purchase requisition. Also planning file is having the entry once there is shortage and hence MRP run is there always if there is shortage of material.
    With Regards
    Tarun

    Hi Tarun,
    Please maintain the control parameters as
    Processing Key                                       NETCH
    Create Purchase Requisition                          1
    Sched. Agreement Schedule Line                   3
    Create MRP List                                            1
    Planning Mode                                               1
    Scheduling                                                     1
    Please let me know the results.
    Regards,
    satyajit

  • Trigger CIF during custom field change on Purchase Req. and PO

    Hi,
    We added a custom date field in Purchase Req. and Purchase Order transactions (ME52N/ME22N) in ECC. When this custom field gets changed along with any other standard field, outbound CIF process happens. However, when we change this custom field only, then outbound CIF doesn't happen. I believe we need change pointers and may be custom code to trigger outbound CIF. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to achieve this functionality.
    Thanks.
    Naveen

    Hello Naveen,
    Use user exit EXIT_SAPLMEAP_001 here, the structure CIFPUORCUS must be enhanced with custom fields so that the document date can be included (IT_OUTPUT_CUS).transferred to CT_MM_DOC. You need to fill EBAN and EKPO for change transfer. Also you can have the background job for RIMODINI to transfer the changes.
    Best Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • MRP Generating Purchase Reqs for Materials Needed in 2013

    Hi, all.  We're running MRP and it's generating a massive amount of purchase requisitions (18,310 to be exact).
    The following is a typical part setup:
    Lot size = EX
    Planned delivery time = 5 days
    GR processing time = 2 days
    Individual/collective requirements = 1
    MRP profile = BTO
    We have one existing sales order with a delivery date in 2014.
    With a lead time of roughly a week, why is MRP generating purchase requisitions out into 2013 for this material??
    Thanks!
    Sarah

    Sarah,
    MRP Profile doesn't mean much to us, they are all created individually during each implementation, and they are all different.  However, I will guess that BTO is some type of Make-to-order profile.
    You mention 18K of PRs.  Are these all being created in a single run, or is it possible that they may have been accumulating for a while?   To find out, run MRP, but using the parameter for Planning mode 'Delete and Recreate planning data'.  It will delete all the unfirmed PRs and then regenerate new ones based on the current situation.  I will assume for the moment that all these 'future' PRs are unfirmed, please let me know if they are not.
    Since it appears to be a MTO environment (if not, let me know) then you should be able to see in the planning segment which requirement (sales order) is driving the purchase reqs.  Depending on your MRP type, this could give you understanding of why MRP is proposing so many PRs.
    One thing that will generate a large number of purch reqs is an unrealistic value in Maximum Lot size (MRP1 page of material master).  For instance, for a requirement of 1000 widgets, and a max lot size of , say, 2, it would generate 500 PRs for 2 widgets each.
    If my suggestions don't help you, please specify MRP Type, Lot Size, max lot size, rounding value, Safety stock, reorder point, Strategy group,   From these values we can begin to understand your problem a little better.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Purchase Reqs created through work orders

    Currently when I attach a non-stock item into a work order it create a purchase req. The purchase req is automatically released, or is released when the work order is. The problem is that we have a release strategy that we must follow here at my company. When the Reg is automatically release it does not follow this strategy.
    Is there a way that i could turn off this functionality, and have those req follow our standard release strategy.

    Hello!
    If you don't want to convert PR into PO, then why you are creating it. There can be two cases:
    1. You want to create PR but don't want the material right now. In that case change the delivery date. 
    2. You don't want to do anything now. You want material after 6 months, only you want is to create a maintenanc eorder. In
    that case you can enter the material nad service on ly at the time of requirement.
    You can talk to MM consultant also you can put control this by release strategy also.
    Is there any other case that you are facing. Please discuss.
    - Vaibhav Mishra

  • Purchase req: allow a customer to view purchase req info via portal

    I would like to know what is the best way to setup a view to allow a customer to view their purchase reqs. Is their a webservice to push info to their portal page or should we setup an ivew and allow them to view PR information.
    Should I use webservices or BAPIs?
    Thanks
    Mikie

    Hi,
    we managed to solve this by implementing BADI /SAPAPO/DM_PO_CHANG2.  Problem solved.
    Best Regards,
    Sam

Maybe you are looking for

  • Converting from Word to .pdf distorts formatting

    When I convert a Word document to a .pdf, when I have a bulleted list and the first sentence of each bullet is underlined, format gets distorted when I print to .pdf. I've retyped the document from scratch and experimented with a few different fonts

  • How do I turn off 'system resume on start up'

    How do I turn off 'system resurme on start up'? or How do I stop windows 'reopen on login'? this is a very annoying feature.

  • To disable first row in a DataGrid

    Hi all, I have a data grid displaying 4 rows.In this data grid i want to make the first row alone disabled that is the first row should not be editable but the remaining rows should be editable.Can anyone please help me out in this issue. Thanks & Re

  • E rec 600 - APPLY_DIRECTLY

    Hi All, We have upgraded 4.6c to ECC 6.0 SP11 (technical). We are in process of implementing E-recruitment for internal job postings. E-rec 600 is installed on the same server of ECC. We are using structural authorization profiles for all our employe

  • Time Zone support

    I understand the basic gist of time zone support as it is pretty straight forward, but I'm constantly finding myself confused when I use time zone support when I travel.  For instance, I use EDT and sometimes put events in my calendar that I know I'l