SOAP to File !!!!!!!!!!! possible or not??? without BPM

Hello Friends....
WOuld it be possible to implement this scenario without s/a BPM?
If yes, then from where the response would send to SOAP ?
I have created following objects in Repository,
data type for SOAP request
Data type for SOAP response
Data type for File request
Data type for File response(dont know do i need this)
Message types for them
two interface mapping....
outbound sync   (soap request and soap response)
inbound sync   (file request and file response)
message mapping
soap request to file request
file response to soap response
in interface mapping.... I am confused...what to do in there??
thanks,
Pranav

I want sync communication between SOAP and File...
response could be anything...any constant or just confirmation that data has been sent.
DO i need to use synch/async BPM for this or could i do it without that as well.
what kind of response we get from sync/asyn bridge???

Similar Messages

  • SOAP to Synch JMS(Websphere MQ) without BPM

    Hi
    i  have created an interface for SOAP to Synch JMS (Websphere MQ)without BPM.
    I have reffered the SAP Note 1086303 - XI JMS Adapter and IBM Websphere MQ (Que : 4).
    Since JMS adapter is a Asynchronous adapter with EO & EOIO, how to proceed with this interface.
    I am  in PI 7.11 .....
    Sender : Soap Adapter
    Receiver : Created 2 JMS channels....1) Receiver(for Request Queue) 2) Sender(Response Queue)
    I am testing through soap Ui....
    Please let me know if someone has done this interface..
    Regards
    Reema

    I have done the configuration using integrated configuration where sender is Portal & receiver is receiver JMS channel.
    Not sure how it works in case of Integrated Configuration...may be you can first try with the normal procedure (including IE) and then check if the flow is working.
    what should be the sender service portal or JMS MQ?
    The sender would be the JMS service....the response soming from the JMS will be posted to the waiting response part of the original sender (in your case SOAP).

  • Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario  -  ( Without BPM )

    I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
    Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
    A-->B
    B-->C
    In the 2nd Mapping step  I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
    2nd Mapping step is as follows
    Source 1..1
      Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
        field1  0..1
        field2  0..1
        filed3  0..1
    Target
    Message 1
        Idoc   1.. Unbounded
          Idoc Structure..
    Message 2
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    Message 3
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    Message 4
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages (  1 each under each Message )
    Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
    Thanks for any help..RK

    Hi,
    See the blog
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    <i>Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
    - we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
    - we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
    The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
    so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
    hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
    The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
    on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
    It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
    if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.</i>
    Please see the bwlow threads also..
    IDOC Splitting
    File To IDOC Thru XI
    Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
    Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
    Regards
    Chilla..

  • Multiple files to idoc without bpm

    Hi
    I have gone through the previous threads and came to know that n:1 is not possible without bpm. But in case of idocs you can collect them in r/3 system itself using RSEOUT00 program. But if my scenario is like.......you have 10 files which are coming through ftp and we have  to send the idoc to the target system. Is there any way to do this scenario without bpm ??
    Thanks
    kumar

    Hi palnati !
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible 
    Multiple IDocs without BPM(occurance change)
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    In case you have multiple IDoc types ref:
    /people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm
    Have a look at this blog.. Might be helps to you..
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2748. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Pls reward if useful

  • How to PI call R/3 RFC without BPM.

    Hi Expert.
    Why PI direct call RFC probably is not a possibility of doing without BPM.
    It makes RFC of separate way, it calling it is made Report program where there is a possibility of doing.
    Different adapter where it becomes direct call, RFC piece bay occupational calling there probably is not a possibility of doing.

    Krishna Moorthy P, Thank you so much your answer.
    I add question.
    My scenario is very simple.
    Case 1. File to RFC to JDBC Scenario. (Sync)
               Using BPM. PI call File adatper, and PI call RFC Function, and RFC return data send to PI to JDBC.
    Case 2. QRFC to JDBC Scenario.(Async)
                Using se37 for back job. So, Back job Function send to PI to JDBC.
    In this two case, to what kind of is the efficiency better.
    <b>I think that case 2 is performance better case1.</b>
    It isn't like that? Krishna Moorthy P
    I wating for your answer.
    Message was edited by:
            JuYeop Kim

  • File to BAPI with out BPM

    can we do File---> BAPI with out BPM

    Which version of XI you are using??
    XI 3.0 or PI 7.0?? and SP for it?
    Reffer this File to RFC Scenario without BPM
    FOr solution reffer this : File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
    Thanks
    Farooq.

  • Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM

    Hello!
    We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
    We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
    We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
    I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
    Regards, Tanja

    Hi Tanja,
    >>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
    I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
    IDoc -> BP
    BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
    BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
    In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
    Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
    >>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
    Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
    Filling of ALEAUD fields:
    E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
    I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
    Regards,
    Udo

  • Idoc to soap sync without bpm. is it possible? Helping me..

    Hi Experts,
    i have a small clarification Idoc to soap sync interface in sap pi 7.0. i created IDoc to Soap sync using BPM but some times the signals are stuck due to load issue in swpr, while reprocess those signals all going successfully to the receiver. So We are trying to eliminate BPM.
    I just wanted to know Idoc to Soap sync scenario without BPM is possible or not in SAP PI 7.0?
    if it is possible kindly send me the links
    Regards,
    Kiran polani

    Hi Kiran,
    Could you please let us know the exact requirement. How do you want to send the response back to IDOC?
    ASync - Sync Bridge with IDOC sender is not possible in PI 7.0.
    If It is something like IDOC --> SOAP --> IDOC , And If the SOAP request is small then you can use SOAP Lookup in IDOC to IDOC Scenario.
    In The mapping You can do a lookup and get the response from SOAP(Webservice) and map that to your Target IDOC.
    This is one possible way for you without BPM in PI7.0.
    Please let me know if you need more details about this.
    Thanks
    Jyothi A

  • SOAP to RFC synchronous scenario with File without BPM

    Hi Folks,
    I have a requirement that has to be done with out BPM!!!
    Requirement:
    Soap will trigger the request to SAP(RFC) and SAP sends the response to a file and then after SOAP has to recieve the ACK from PI.
    1) Can we do this by without using BPM
    2)Can we use without BPM module entries for SOAP Sender
    Please suggest and help me out in this
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards
    vivek

    Hi Vivek,
      Why not have the SOAP interface defined as synchronous?
    You can avoid using BPM that way.
    Best Regards,
    Ravi

  • File - RFC - File without BPM  ---  Object not found in ResponseOneWayBean

    I am using PI 7.1, and facing the following error in File - RFC - File without BPM
    "Error: com.sap.engine.services.jndi.persistent.exceptions.NameNotFoundException: Object not found in lookup of ResponseOneWayBean."
    I am using 1 sender CC for File ( CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_SND)
                      1 receiver CC for File( CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_FILE)
                     1 receiver CC for RFC (CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_RFC)
    in the sender CC I have given Module parameter as:
    Processing sequene
    CallSapAdapter    Local Enterprise Bean 2
    AF_Modules/ResponseOneWayBean  Local Enterprise Bean 3
    AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean  Local Enterprise Bean 1
    Module configuration:
    1     passThrough          true
    3    receiverChannel      CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_FILE
    3    receiverService       Bus_File
    pls let me know where i am wrong

    Hi
    i am facing following error:
    2009-12-03 09:08:17       Information        The application sent the message asynchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Returning to application.
    2009-12-03 09:08:17       Information       MP: processing local module localejbs/AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean
    2009-12-03 09:08:17      Error                 MP: exception caught with cause java.lang.NullPointerException
    2009-12-03 09:08:17      Error                 File processing failed with java.lang.NullPointerException

  • File is not getting deleted in File-RFC-File without BPM

    Hi,
    I'm working on File-RFC-File scenario without BPM. Everything is working fine except file is not getting deleted after the process. I'm passing xml file here and in return it will give the xml success/error message from RFC.
    For the sender CC, I'm passing the following parameters,
    Transsport protocol: File system
    Message protocol: File
    QoS: BE
    Poll Interval: 30 sec
    Mode: Delete
    File type: Binay
    Please let me know if I missed anything while passing the values.
    Thanks,
    Swamy
    Edited by: Swamy Mothe on Jun 15, 2009 8:52 AM

    Hi
    Then , is Sender and receiver File Adapter is using same folder )
    Just a question.
    But having all permisions and above config would delete the file
    can u see the status of u r File Adapter in RWB.? Is it in green?
    rgds
    srini

  • Async-Sync Bridge without BPM for SOAP WS and JDBC

    I heard you can now have async-sync communication outside of BPM by utilizing adapter modules?
    My scenarios are:
    proxy (async) -> SOAP WS (sync)
    proxy (async) -> JDBC (sync)
    I will like to capture the synchronous responses in XI and perform some basic error handling.
    I read h[File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.] and the release notes for 2004s SP19 and there is no reference to JDBC or SOAP.
    tia

    Hi Megha,
    Plz do refer the below links u will get an idea:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a05b2347-01e7-2910-ceac-c45577e574e0
    Sync/Async communication in Adapter without BPM (SP19)
    Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
    Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
    Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
    also try this
    Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
    File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
    Collecting IDocs without using BPM
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
    Have a look
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
    HTTP to RFC - A Starter Kit
    Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Do refer this thread:
    JDBC Async-Sync bridge does not work
    Reward if found useful
    Regards,
    Vinod.

  • File-RFC-File (without BPM)- Issue

    Hi All,
    I am working on a File-RFC-File (without BPM) scenario in PI 7.1.
    My scenario is having few problems like, its not able to delete the file from the source directory path (for which we have delete permissions) and it is an NFS system and it shows an error in the Sender file CC.
    "Error: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.exception.CPAObjectKeyException: Value of key must not be null: ObjectId"
    But it gets processed successfully and provides a written paramter which I could see in MONI, but again doesn't write the file in the target directory. Could you please provide your inputs and let me know if I need to do any additional settings w.r.to PI7.1.
    These are the parameters which I have specified in the Sender File adapter
    Processing sequence
    AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean     Local Enterprise Bean     1
    CallSapAdapter     Local Enterprise Bean     2
    AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean Local Enterprise Bean     3
    Module configuration:
    1     PassThrough     true
    3     receiverChannel     <FilereceiverCCname>
    3     receiverService     <Receiver Bus System>
    Regards,
    Nithiyanandam

    Hello,
    Check out in module configuration tab for any "type error" or spell mistakes.
    Check out this thread which might be useful for you :[ File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.]
    regards
    Ramesh

  • SOAP to FILE using BPM to catch exception and save error into the table

    Hi All
    My scenario SOAP to FILE using BPB is working fine but now I have a requirement to catch an exception if something wrong happened on a runtime and save it into the tracking table, is that possible, if it is please point me to the similar step by step scenario.
    Thanks in advince,
    Yonela

    Yonela:
    As your original requirement is to save the eorr data into your database table, however, you was mis-leaded to alerting field.
    You are using BPM now, then that is the reason that I suggested to use excpetion branch.
    It does not matter SOAP to File seneario, it does not have to be SAP - RFC scenario, your BPM willl interact with database system.
    First you have block which include all the steps that possible generate exception: like Transformation step, and your final Aync send step (which will send data to file).
    Secondly, define a exception handler for that block.
    3. Modify each steps that posssible generate exception: e.g. transformation step, send step, add exception handler to them.
    4. Create exception branch in side the block
    5. Add another send step inside your exception branch, which will call RFC, RFC will write data to your table.
    6. If you want, you can add a control step in exception branch to trigger a alert, or terminate current process.
    At run time, any steps that trigger exeption,will cause your exception branch executed, and RFC will be called to insert data into your database table.
    Regards
    Liang

  • Multimapping (1:N) without BPM  idoc to file

    Hi
    I have a scenario in PI7.1 like source is idoc ,it should be splitted into 14 different files based on some condition.
    I am doing this without BPM(1:N) message mapping and operational mapping is working fine.
    Whent i am testing,empty files are generated means no values comming except the target message type.
    Note: checked the most of the links and blogs but no help
    Everything seems fine but not getting the values.Can anybody help. Can multimapping done with source idoc?
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks
    Prasad Nemalikanti

    Hi Prasad,
    It will definitely work and please see the jin for exactly the same scenario.
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    While testing in mapping make sure you put your payload within:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
          <YOUR PAYLOAD HERE>
       </ns0:Message1>
    </ns0:Messages>
    Regards,
    ---Satish

Maybe you are looking for

  • PCI-E 2.1 X16 Graphics card on MSI K9A2VM-FD motherboard

    Hi, I recently bought an AMD Radeon 6870 graphics card to upgrade my aging machine. The card is a PCI-E 2.1 X16 card and unfortunately does not work with my current motherboard. I was recently looking at the MSI K9A2VM-FD motherboard as a possible re

  • How to delete the entries in CDCLS table

    Hi All, There is a potential issue with the size of table CDCLS on production system. We need to reduce or manage the amount of data in this table. CDCLS is a cluster table and cannot be reduced directly, So first we were reduced the entries in CDHDR

  • Photoshop - Difficulty with psd files

    I use CS5.  All of a sudden I can't open psd files.  They all look like the image below with this almost checkboard like appearance on them.  jpgs open fine.  This is happening with files on multiple EHDs so it doesn't seem to be an issue with one fi

  • MacBook printer problem

    Good day. I am having a problem with my new MacBook and hope you can help. I have it connected to an HP 5550 deskjet printer via USB cable. I can print things off my desktop but when I try to print from an application (Photoshop, Illustrator) it unex

  • Weird issue with ls

    Note: the only thing that I was doing out of the ordinary in the hours before this started was going to a directory in / that was not shown in Finder via Terminal. It was not a hidden directory (.filename), so I don't know why the Finder didn't show